16
Improvement- 1

Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-1

Page 2: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Continuous ImprovementContinuous Improvement

Check Do

Act Plan

Time

Qua

lity

leve

l

Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Page 3: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-3

Lead a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) process improvement initiative.

Use quality tools for analysis and problem solving.

Compare and contrast the corporate programs for quality improvement.

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

Page 4: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-4

Foundations of Continuous Improvement

- Customer Satisfaction- Management by Facts- Respect for People

Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle

Problem Solving (10 steps)

Quality and Productivity Improvement Process

Quality and Productivity Improvement Process

Page 5: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-5

Quality ToolsQuality Tools

Check Sheet

Run Chart

Histogram

Pareto Chart

Flowchart

Cause-and-Effect Diagram

Scatter Diagram

Control Chart

Page 6: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-6

Check SheetCheck Sheet

Month Lost Departure Mechanical Overbooked Other Luggage Delay January 1 2 3 3 1 February 3 3 0 1 0 March 2 5 3 2 3 April 5 4 4 0 2 May 4 7 2 3 0 June 3 8 1 1 1 July 6 6 3 0 2 August 7 9 0 3 0 September 4 7 3 0 2 October 3 11 2 3 0 November 2 10 1 0 0 December 4 12 2 0 1

Total 44 84 24 16 12

Page 7: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-7

Run ChartRun Chart

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Months

De

pa

rtu

re D

ela

ys

Page 8: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-8

Histogram of Lost LuggageHistogram of Lost Luggage

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Occurrences per Month

Fre

qu

en

cy

Page 9: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-9

Equipment Personnel

Procedure

Material

Other

Aircraft late to gateLate arrival

Gate occupied

Mechanical failuresLate pushback tug

WeatherAir traffic

Late food serviceLate fuel

Late baggage to aircraft

Gate agents cannot process passengers quickly enoughToo few agents

Agents undertrainedAgents undermotivated

Agents arrive at gate late

Late cabin cleaners

Late or unavailable cockpit crewsLate or unavailable cabin crews

Poor announcement of departuresWeight and balance sheet late

Delayed checkin procedureConfused seat selection

Passengers bypass checkin counterChecking oversize baggage

Issuance of boarding pass

Acceptance of late passengersCutoff too close to departure time

Desire to protect late passengersDesire to help company’s income

Poor gate locations

DelayedFlightDeparture

Cause-and-Effect Chart for Flight Departure Delay (Fishbone Chart)

Cause-and-Effect Chart for Flight Departure Delay (Fishbone Chart)

Page 10: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-10

Pareto Analysis of Flight Departure Delay Causes

Pareto Analysis of Flight Departure Delay Causes

Cause Percentage of Incidents

Cumulative Percentage

Late passengers 53.3 53.3

Waiting for pushback 15.0 68.3

Waiting for fuel 11.3 79.6

Late weight and balance sheet

8.7 88.3

Page 11: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-11

FlowchartFlowchart

Passenger Arrives

Ticket No Wait for For Flight Appropriate Flight

Yes

Check Yes Excess Luggage Carry-on

No

Issue Boarding Pass

Passenger Boards Airplane

Page 12: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-12

Scatter DiagramScatter Diagram

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Late Passengers

De

pa

rtu

re D

ela

ys

Page 13: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-13

60

70

80

90

100

Per

cen

tag

e o

f fl

igh

ts o

n

tim

e

expected

Lower Control Limit

1998 1999

n

pppUCL

1(3

n

pppLCL

1(3

Control Chart of Departure DelaysControl Chart of Departure Delays

Page 14: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-14

Marriott Personnel Programs

Zero Defects (Crosby)

Deming’s 14 Point Program

Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award

ISO 9000

Six-Sigma

Corporate Programs for Quality Improvement

Corporate Programs for Quality Improvement

Page 15: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-15

Mega Bytes RestaurantMega Bytes Restaurant

1. How is the Seven-Step Method (SSM) different from Deming’s PDCA cycle?

2. Prepare a cause-and-effect or fishbone diagram for a problem such as “Why customers have long waits for coffee.” Use Figure 6.30 as a guide.

3. How would you resolve the difficulties that study teams have experienced when applying the SSM?

Page 16: Improvement-1. Continuous Improvement Check Do Act Plan Time Quality level Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Improvement-16

The Seven-Step MethodThe Seven-Step Method

Step 1: Define the project

Step 2: Study the current situation

Step 3: Analyze the potential causes

Step 4: Implement a solution

Step 5: Check the results

Step 6: Standardize the improvement

Step 7: Establish future plans