Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    1/36

    Implications of New Technologies forDemocratic Change

    in Iran

    Cyrus Farivarhttp://[email protected]

    Global Voices 2010May 7, 2010

    http://www.ickr.com/photos/yahyanatanzi/3837114239/

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    2/36

    0. Who am I?

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    3/36

    I. A Twitter Revolution?

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    4/36

    I. A Twitter Revolution?

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    5/36

    Not so much: Web Ecology Project (June 26, 2009)

    Source: http://ww w.webecologyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/WEP-twitterFINAL.pdf

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    6/36

    Irans Internet Statistics

    2000: One million Internet users2008: 23 million Internet users

    Growth rate: 48 percentInternet penetration rate: 35 percent

    Average Middle East Internet penetration rate: 26 percentSource: OpenNet Initiative (http://opennet.net/research/proles/iran)

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    7/36

    Dear subscriber,access to this site is

    not possible. In casethis site has been

    mistakenly lteredplease email

    [email protected] with thedomain name and

    necessaryexplanation.

    Internet Filtering in Iran

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    8/36

    God is with us / Are you ltering him too? (2009)

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    9/36

    II. How we got here

    Islamic Revolution:1978-1979

    Islamic Republic Declared: April 1, 1979

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    10/36

    II. How we got here

    Iran-Iraq War: 1980-1988

    ~ 500,000 dead

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    11/36

    March 1989: World Wide Web Invented

    Tim Berners-Lee (UK), a

    visiting scientist at CERN(Switzerland) invents

    World Wide Web.

    1990:2 mil Internet users

    (~85% are American)

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    12/36

    June 1989:Khomeini dies, Khamenei now Supreme Leader

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    13/36

    1992: Iran gets online

    1988: Dr. Siavash Shahshahani uses Internet inItaly for rst time

    1992: Mohammad-Javad Larijani (Director of Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics andMathematics, Tehran), authorizes rst connectionto Internet.

    1992: Iran connects to Internet (via Austria)

    1995: 30,000 Iranians online

    2010: M-J Larijani is a Khamenei adviser, headof human rights council in Judiciary Dept.Brother Ali Larijani was chief Iranian nuclearnegotiator and is currently speaker of Iranian

    parliament. Other brother Sadeq Larijani is thenew head of Iranian Judiciary.

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    14/36

    1992: Iran gets online

    According to the Internet Society, in the rst half of this yearIran had the world's second highest increase in numbers of reachable computers hooked up to the Internet.

    But will the mullahs -- once they gure out the full extent of what's going on -- allow it?

    -- Carroll Bogert, Chat Rooms and Chadors: Iran: Will theInternet open a closed society? , Newsweek , August 21, 1995

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    15/36

    May 23, 1997: Mohammed Khatami Elected

    No, no, I don't like to hear slogans likethat, [President Khatami] exclaimed. Idon't like to hear 'Death to opponents' or death to anybody, because as matters standin our society at present, it will beinterpreted in a very negative way, asmeaning that anybody who does not shareyour views should be silenced, and that'snot right at all. The Iran we want should beone where there will be room for all thedifferent viewpoints, for all ideologies, eventhose that oppose the President. They, too,must have the right to express themselves.

    John F. Burns, As Iran's Reformer Speaks, Anti-ReformersSit and Scowl, The New York Times, September 30, 1999

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    16/36

    Montazeri.com vs. Montazery.com: Ayatollahs wage war on InternetFriday 15 December 2000 - Agence France Presse

    PARIS, Dec 15 (AFP) - Dissident cleric Hossein Ali Montazeri, once in lineto be Iran's supreme leader, this week dropped a political bombshell by

    publishing his memoirs on the Internet and provoking a cyber war with theleadership in Tehran.

    Montazeri, 79, who had been chosen to succeed Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,founder of the Islamic republic, has been living under house arrest in Qom,south of Tehran, ever since he was forced to resign weeks before Khomeini'sdeath in 1989.

    . . .

    But he struck a hard blow on Monday when he published a 600-page memoir onan Internet site based in Britain, which his sons veried as his work. The document,

    published in Persian and available at www.montazeri.com, provides importanttestimony to some of the most dramatic moments of the revolution and the war withIraq.

    Authorities in Tehran have so far not publicly reacted to Montazeri's memoirs but on

    Thursday a counter-site -- www.montazery.com -- appeared on the internet anddescribed itself as representing the office of Khamenei.

    December 2000: Montazeri.com vs. Montazery.com

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    17/36

    September/October 2001: First Persian Blogs

    http://www.globalpersian.com/archive/010901.html

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080730053406/http://i.hoder.com/archives/2001/10/011007_005490.shtml

    Salman JaririSeptember 7, 2001

    Hossein Hoder Derakhshan

    October 7, 2001

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    18/36

    May 2001: Four hundred Tehran cybercafsshut down

    June 2001: Iran TelecommunicationsCompany bans children under 18 from

    accessing Internet

    November 2001: Supreme Council for Cultural Revolution declares all ISPs should

    be state-controlled

    September 2002: Then-Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Seyed Mahmoud HashemiShahroudi (pictured) calls for the creation of a special committee for legal investigationon Internet-related crimes and offenses.

    December 2002: Committee Responsible for Determining Unauthorized Sites established

    2001 - 2002: Crackdown, Part I

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    19/36

    April 20, 2003: Sina Motalebi arrested

    http://web.archive.org/web/20040422231903/www.rooznegar.com/archives/2003_04.php

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    20/36

    http://www.iranhrdc.org/httpdocs/English/pdfs/Reports/Forced%20Confessions%20-%20Targeting%20Iran%27s%20Cyber-Journalists.pdf

    2004: Crackdown, Part II

    September - October 2004: Many bloggers, online journalists arrested

    Including: Omid Memarian(pictured, center)

    Source: Iran Human RightsDocumentation Center September 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    21/36

    November 2005: We Are Iran released

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    22/36

    August 8, 2006: Pres. Ahmadinejad begins blog

    http://web.archive.org/web/20070509211753/http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/en/autobiography/

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    23/36

    April 2008: John Kelly & Bruce Etling study released

    http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2008/Mapping_Irans_Online_Public

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    24/36

    March 18, 2009: Omid Reza Mirsaya dies in prison

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    25/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    26/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=422June 21, 2009

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    27/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=504September 7, 2009

    Iranian Revolutionary Guards ready to ght cyber and Internet war

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    28/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=517October 1, 2009

    An Internet battle report in the defeated velvet coup

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    29/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    December 3, 2009

    In recent months, Iran has been conducting a campaign of harassing and intimidatingmembers of its diaspora world-wide -- not just prominent dissidents -- who criticize theregime, according to former Iranian lawmakers and former members of Iran's elite securityforce, the Revolutionary Guard, with knowledge of the program.

    Part of the effort involves tracking the Facebook, Twitter and YouTube activity of Iraniansaround the world, and identifying them at opposition protests abroad, these people say.

    Interviews with roughly 90 ordinary Iranians abroad -- college students, housewives, doctors,lawyers, businesspeople -- in New York, London, Dubai, Sweden, Los Angeles and otherplaces indicate that people who criticize Iran's regime online or in public demonstrations arefacing threats intended to silence them.

    Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125978649644673331.html

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    30/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    On their own, new technologies do not takesides in the struggle for freedom and progress,but the United States does. We stand for a singleinternet where all of humanity has equal access

    to knowledge and ideas. And we recognize thatthe worlds information infrastructure willbecome what we and others make of it.

    -- Secretary of State Hilary ClintonWashington, D.C., January 21, 2010

    Source: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135519.htm

    http://www.state.gov/statecraft/

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    31/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    February 2, 2010

    Do you have a representative or a spokesperson outside the country?

    In the green movement, every citizen is a media outlet. But the green path does not have arepresentative or spokesperson outside the country. This is one of its beauties. Everyone can talkabout their ideas and the movement expands within a collaborative environment. As one of themembers of the movement, I, too, will express my comments and suggestions in this environment.

    Source: http://www.kaleme.org/1388/11/13/klm-10327

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    32/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    http://gerdab.ir/fa/pages/?cid=607February 2, 2010

    Computer Crimes ActArticle 1: Any unauthorized access of data, information or the Internet & Telecommunicationssystems which are under security measures will be sentenced to ninety days to one yearin prison, or nes of ve to twenty million rials ($500 - $2,000), or both.

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    33/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    Source:http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-04/iran-says-cut-disrupts-internet-opposition-blames-government.html

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    34/36

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    35/36

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    1995: Nicholas Negroponte (Professor, MIT):

    The Internet can:atten organizations, globalize society,

    decentralize control and harmonize people.The nation-state may go away.

    ~1858: Henry Field (pastor, author, brother of Cyrus Field)

    The Telegraph: unites distant nations, making them feelthat they are members of one great family

    By such strong ties does it tend to bind the human race inunity, peace and concord.

  • 8/9/2019 Implications of New Technologies for Democratic Change in Iran

    36/36

    What we have seen, time and time again, isthat physical coercion by government thehallmark of a traditional legal system remains far more important than anyoneexpected. This may sound crude and ugly and even depressing. Yet at a fundamental level, itsthe most important thing missing from most

    predictions of where globalization will lead,and the most significant gap in predictionsabout the future shape of the Internet.

    III. Potential for Democratic Change?

    Tim Wu and Jack Goldsmith, Who Controls the Internet? (Oxford University Press, 2006), 180