Imperfect 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    1/17

    Imperfect Competition Continued

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    2/17

    Monopolistic Competition

    Many sellers

    Product differentia

    tion each firm produces a slightly different versionof product

    each has a monopoly on differentiated product

    Free entry into industry drives profit to zero in long run

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    3/17

    Short-Run Equilibrium

    Just like monopoly

    Faces downward sloping demand and MR Maximizes profit by producing quantity at

    which MC=MR

    Enjoys economic profit if, at equilibrium,P>AC

    Suffers loss if, at equilibrium, P

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    4/17

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    5/17

    $

    0 Output

    D, AR

    MR

    ACMC

    Qe

    Pe

    ACe

    Loss

    Monopolistic Competition with

    Short-Run Loss

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    6/17

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    7/17

    $

    0 Output

    D, AR

    MR

    AC

    MC

    Qe

    PeACe=

    Monopolistic Competition in

    Long-Run Equilibrium

    Zero profit

    MCe

    In equilibrium, P>MC

    and the firm is NOToperating at the

    minimum point of its

    AC curve. For both

    reasons, monopolistic

    competition is notefficient.

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    8/17

    Characteristics of Equilibrium

    Just as in the monopoly case, price exceeds

    marginal cost in the short and long run

    efficiency requires price to equal marginal cost

    Just as with perfect competition, firms may

    earn either positive or negative profits in the

    short run but in the long run profits are zero

    In the long run, there is excess capacity

    the firm produces less than that which would

    minimize costs

    not efficient

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    9/17

    Advertising

    Because price exceeds marginal cost, these

    firms would love to sell more

    the problem is that selling more requires lowering

    the price unless more consumers decide to buy at the current price

    The trick is to advertise

    advertising increases demand

    the demand curve AND marginal revenue curve shift

    also creates brand loyalty

    makes demand less elastic

    increases markup of price over marginal cost

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    10/17

    The Debate over Advertising

    The cons

    waste of resources to make consumers think

    they want something they dont really want

    makes consumers think that there are

    differences that dont really exist

    impedes competition makes demand less elastic

    increases inefficient markup of price over marginal cost

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    11/17

    The pros

    increases competition by providing information

    to consumers

    price differences

    location

    new products

    without advertising, it would be very difficult for new

    firms to enter

    advertising signals quality

    even when nothing is said about quality in the ad!

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    12/17

    The Competitive Effects of

    Advertising

    Advertising impedes competition by

    making demand less elastic

    Advertising promotes competition byproviding information

    The net effect appears to be pro-competitive

    professionals like doctors, optometrists, andlawyers try to get state governments to prohibit

    advertising as unprofessional

    prices substantially lower when advertising

    allowed

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    13/17

    Case Study: Advertisingand eyeglasses in 1960s, states varied considerably on laws

    concerning advertising of eyeglasses

    provided natural experiment of effect on prices

    prohibition ofadvertising associated with 20%

    higher prices

    in 1970s, Florida repealed its ban on advertising

    prices plummeted

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    14/17

    Advertising as aSignal of

    Quality

    Advertising can be very expensive

    The willingness of firms to spend a lot on

    ads with famous movie or sports stars is a

    signal to consumers that they think their

    product is good

    firms that know their products are mediocre

    will not be as willing to invest massively on aproduct that is likely to be rejected by

    consumers

    consumers are then rationally more likely to try

    products that are expensively advertised

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    15/17

    The Effects of Brand Names

    Are the resources that go into maintaining a

    brand name a waste?

    is there rea

    llya

    ny difference between Ba

    yerand generic aspirin?

    In many cases, society gets real benefits

    gives consumers information about quality

    when quality cannot be easily determined inadvance of purchase

    gives producers strong incentive to maintain

    quality to protect brand name

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    16/17

    Consider what happens when you pull offa

    highway looking for something to eat theres Joes Dinerand McDonalds

    most will pickMcDonalds because they know

    exactly what they will get there and they have

    no idea what they will get at Joes Diner

    quality assurance is valuable to consumers

    this brand identification is valuable to firms

    M

    cDona

    lds will investa

    lot to ma

    inta

    in it food poisoning at one store would be hugely costly to itsreputation

  • 8/8/2019 Imperfect 3

    17/17

    Summary ofMarket Structures

    Number of firms

    Monopolyutilities

    cable TV

    Microsoft???

    Oligopolycrude oil

    autos

    golf balls

    One

    firm Fewfirms

    Product

    Monopolistic

    Competitioncereal

    OTC drugs

    toothpaste

    PerfectCompetitionwheat

    beef

    nails

    Differentiated Identical