Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Impact of Consumer Ethnocentrism and Country of Origin Image on
Consumer Beliefs and Attitudes to Purchase Products Made In
Indonesia and Malaysia:
Case study of West Kalimantan, Indonesia and Sarawak, Malaysia
Heriyadi Kusnaryadi
Doctor of Philosophy
2016
Impact of Consumer Ethnocentrism and Country of Origin Image on Consumer
Beliefs and Attitudes to Purchase Products Made In Indonesia and Malaysia:
Case study of West Kalimantan, Indonesia and Sarawak, Malaysia
Heriyadi Kusnaryadi
A thesis submitted
In fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marketing
Faculty of Economics and Business
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK
2016
i
Dedication
This Thesis is dedicated to:
My Mother, Mother in Law,
My Wife, My Son and Daughter, My Brothers, My Sister,
for pray, support and understanding to make this work possible.
ii
Acknowledgement
First and foremost, I give thanks to Allah SWT most gracious most merciful for His blessings,
grace and mercy to me throughout all the days of my life.
I would like express my sincere appreciation to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Ernest Cyril de Run
for his guidance, direction, and friendship throughout the course of this thesis. I am grateful
for his unlimited support and assistance throughout my doctoral program.
I express deep appreciation to Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) and Faculty of
Economics and Business. I also thank Dean of FEB AP Dr. Rohaya bt Mohd Nor,
Dr. Mohamad Affendy Arip, Prof. Dr. Shazali Abu Mansor, Associate Professor Chin-Hong
Puah, Ph.D, Associate Professor Dr. Mat Jaiz, Prof. Dr. Abu Hassan Md Isa, Dr. Norizan
Jaafar, Dr. Jamal Abdul Nasir, Dr. Evan Lau, Dr. Kartinah, Mr. Khairul, and all Lecturers and
Staff in FEB for giving me the confidence to remain in the study when that was all that I
needed to continue.
A big thank you also goes to Rektor of Tanjungpura University Prof. Dr. Thamrin Usman,
Dean of Economics Faculty Prof. Dr. Eddy Suratman, Prof. Asniar Subagiyo, Dr. Ali Alwi,
Mr. Amry A. Machjus, Rudi Mardiansyah, Dr. Titik Rosnani, Dr. Erna Listiana, Dr. Barkah,
and to all those at Economic Faculty of Management Study Program, University of
Tanjungpura Pontianak, West Kalimantan who have helped me during my PhD program.
iii
Thanks are owed to these individuals who at one time or another who have cheered and
helped me on: Ilzar Daud, Dr. Dwi Sunu Kanto Slamet Widodo, Sisnuhadi, and Dr. Fariastuti
Djafar.
And last, my thanks go to my family, brothers and sister and gratitude to my mother for her
blessing and prays for my continued success, my mother in law, to my wife Rinny Yusnita
Absari, for her love, support, patience and understanding, and my children, M. Rafi and Alya
for your smile and always cheer me up.
iv
Abstract
The globalization of business and marketing has provided consumers, all over the world, with
many options to purchase products. The situation is more complex especially in the area
where the regions as part of the share lands and boundaries between countries like Sarawak-
Malaysia and Kalimantan Barat-Indonesia. In the international marketing literature’s theories,
tremendous attention has been given to examining the extent to which the image of the
country-of-origin of the product and consumer ethnocentrism influences consumer perception
and product evaluation. But still, the research about country image and consumer
ethnocentrism that is conducted in the border area is very rare and limited. This study
investigates the attitudes of the consumers and how they evaluate the products from both
countries (Indonesia-Malaysia). The objectives of this thesis is to justify the relationship
among variables (consumer ethnocentrism, country of origin image, Beliefs, and Attitudes)
based on the framework of the proposed model. Moreover, this thesis explores the mediating
role of COI and Beliefs on the relationship of consumer ethnocentrism with attitudes and
relationship between COI and attitudes. These relationships will each be assessed at the level
of product involvement (High-Low), cross-national characteristics (Indonesia-Malaysia), and
the cross-culture of the ethnic groups (Malay-Chinese Malaysian Chinese and Malay-
Indonesian). The structural equation modeling (SEM) approach is employed in this study. The
proposed reach a better goodness of fit. Hence, the proposed model can be used to explain the
influence of Consumer Ethnocentrism and Country of origin image on beliefs and attitudes
for both Car and Noodle. All hypothesized relationship and mediating effect are supported.
v
Pengaruh Ethnosentrisme Pengguna dan Imej Negara Asal pada Keyakinan dan Sikap
Pengguna untuk Membeli Produk Buatan Indonesia dan Malaysia: Kajian Kes
Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia dan Sarawak, Malaysia
Abstrak
Globalisasi perniagaan dan pemasaran telah memberikan pelanggan, di seluruh dunia,
dengan banyak pilihan untuk membeli produk. Keadaan ini lebih kompleks khasnya di
kawasan di mana daerah tersebut adalah sebahagian dari kawasan sempadan antara negara
seperti di Sarawak-Malaysia dan Kalimantan Barat-Indonesia. Dalam teori literatur
pemasaran antarabangsa, perhatian yang luar biasa telah diberikan untuk menyemak sejauh
mana imej negara asal produk dan etnosentrisme pelanggan berpengaruh terhadap persepsi
pelanggan dan penilaian produk. Walaubagaimanapun, penelitian tentang imej negara dan
etnosentrisme pengguna yang dilakukan di kawasan sempadan sangat jarang dan terhad.
Penyelidikan ini mengkaji sikap pelanggan dan bagaimana mereka menilai produk dari
kedua negara (Indonesia-Malaysia). Tujuan utama dari tesis untuk menjelaskan pengaruh
etnosentris dan kesan Imej Negara Asal terhadap Keyakinan dan Sikap pelanggan dalam
konteks Indonesia dan Malaysia. Selain itu, tesis ini meneroka peran pembolehubah
perantara dari imej negara asal dan keyakinan pada hubungan antara ethnosentris pengguna
dan sikap pengguna serta hubungan antara imej negara asal dan sikap. Hubungan ini akan
dinilai pada setiap satu tahap penglibatan produk (tinggi-rendah), ciri-ciri merentasi negara
(Indonesia-Malaysia), dan silang budaya bagi kumpulan etnik (Melayu-Cina Malaysia dan
Melayu-Cina Indonesia).Pendekatan Pemodelan Persamaan Struktur dilakukan dan sebagai
hasilnya, kajian ini berjaya membangunkan model baru, model yang menyeluruh yang
vi
dicadangkan adalah model yang lebih baik untuk menjelaskan pengaruh etnosentrisme
pengguna dan imej negara asal terhadap keyakinan dan sikap tehadap produk asing. Semua
hubungan hipotesis dan kesan perantaraan disokong.
vii
Table of Contents
Dedication i
Acknowledgement ii
Abstract iv
Abstrak v
Table of Contents vii
List of Tables xiii
List of Figures xvii
List of Abbreviations xix
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of Study 1
1.2. Problem Statements 5
1.3. Research Question 8
1.4. Research Objectives 9
1.5. Research Scope 9
1.5.1 . Research Setting 9
1.5.2 . Unit of Analysis 11
1.6. Research Context 11
1.7. Significance and Expected Contribution ot the Study 15
viii
1.8. Summary 17
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Introduction 18
2.2. Country Image Country of Origin Image (COI) 18
2.2.1. Definition of Country Image 18
2.2.2. Operationalization of Country Image 21
2.3. Consumer Ethnocentrism 24
2.4 Products Beliefs and Consumer Attitudes 28
2.5. Consumer Ethnocentrism and Country Image 30
2.6. Country of origin effects or Country Image and Product Evaluation 34
2.7. Consumer Ethnocentrism and Product Evaluation 39
2.8. Sub-Cultural differences in COO effects on Product Evaluation 41
2.9. Type of Product Involvement influence on COI effects on Product Evaluation 44
2.9.1. Measuring Purchase Involvement 46
2.9.2. The distinction between types of involvement 47
2.9.3. Underlying meaning of involvement 47
2.9.4. Construct validity of involvement 47
2.10. Gaps in the Current Research 50
2.11. Conceptual Framework 52
2.12. Summary 59
ix
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN
3.1. Introduction 61
3.2. Research Hypotheses Development 61
3.3. Measurement of Constructs 64
3.4. Questionnaire Design 65
3.5. Questionnaire Language 66
3.6. Questionnaire Pretest 66
3.7. Research Design 67
3.8. Preliminary Design and Pretest 67
3.9. Pretest Overview 68
3.10. Main Research Design 76
3.10.1. Population 77
3.10.2. Sampling Design and Sample Size 77
3.10.3. Data Collection Procedure 78
3.11. Data Analysis 80
3.12. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) 80
3.12.1 Two Stage SEM Approaches 81
3.12.2 Measurement Model (CFA) Validity 83
3.12.3 Structural Model 86
3.12.4 Model Fit Evaluation 87
x
3.13. Direct and Indirect Effect 89
3.14. Summary 90
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS
4.1. Introduction 91
4.2. Study in Kalimantan Barat 91
4.2.1. Profile of Respondents 91
4.2.2. Test of Normality 92
4.2.3. Analysis and Results of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) 94
4.2.3.1 First Stage – Measurement Model 94
4.2.3.2 Second Stage – Structural Model 108
4.2.4. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for Alternative Model 114
4.2.5. Comparison between Holistic Model and Flexible Model 117
4.2.6. Mediating Effects for Car 119
4.2.7. Mediating Effects for Noodle 122
4.3. Study in Sarawak 126
4.3.1. Profile of Respondents 126
4.3.2. Test of Normality 126
4.3.3. Analysis and Results of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) 128
4.3.3.1 First Stage – Measurement Model 128
4.3.3.2 Second Stage – Structural Model 140
xi
4.3.4. Structural Equation Model (SEM) for Alternative Model 146
4.3.5. Comparison between Holistic Model and Flexible Model 149
4.3.6. Mediating Effects for Car 151
4.3.7. Mediating Effects for Noodle 154
4.3. Summary 157
CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
5.1. Introduction 158
5.2. Discussion of Findings of Kalimantan Barat Study 158
5.2.1. Direct cause and effect relationships between Consumer Ethnocentrism,
Country of Origin Image (COI), Beliefs and Attitudes 158
5.2.2. Mediating Effects 162
5.3. Discussion of Findings of Sarawak Study 166
5.3.1. Direct cause and effect relationships between Consumer Ethnocentrism,
Country of Origin Image (COI), Beliefs and Attitudes 166
5.3.2. Mediating Effects 171
5.4. Conclusion 174
5.5. Implication 175
5.6. Limitations 176
5.7. Future Research Direction 177
5.8. Summary 178
xiii
List of Tables
Table 1: Sarawak Import-Export to Kalimantan 2005-2011 1
Table 2: Review of Country Image Conceptualisations 19
Table 3: Examples of CETSCALE mean values by country 27
Table 4: Summary of Measurement of Construct 65
Table 5: Binomial Test for Noodles in Sarawak-Malaysia 69
Table 6: Binomial Test for Passenger Cars in Sarawak-Malaysia 69
Tabel 7: Binomial Test for Noodles in Kalimantan Barat-Indonesia 70
Tabel 8: Binomial Test for Passenger Cars in Kalimantan Barat-Indonesia 70
Table 9: Mean Value of Noodle’s PDI Based on Ethnicities in Sarawak-Malaysia 71
Table 10: Independent Sample Test for Noodle’s PDI in Sarawak 72
Table 11: Mean Value of Passenger Car’s PDI Based on Ethnicities in Sarawak-Malaysia 73
Table 12: Independent Sample Test for Passenger car’s PDI in Sarawak 73
Table 13: Mean Value of Noodle’s PDI Based on Ethnic Groups in West Kalimantan
Indonesia 74
Table 14: Independent Sample Test for Noodle’s PDI in Kalimantan Barat 74
Table 15: Mean Value of Passenger Car’s PDI Based on Ethnic Groups in West
Kalimatan Indonesia 75
Table 16: Independent Sample Test for Passenger car’s PDI in West Kalimantan 75
xiv
Table 17: Independent Sample Test for Noodle’s PDI between Sarawak and
West Kalimantan 76
Table 18: Independent Sample Test for Passenger car’s PDI Between Sarawak and West
Kalimantan 76
Table 19: Sampling Distribution in Sarawak and West Kalimantan 78
Table 20: Assessment of Fit 88
Table 21: Profile of Respondents from West Kalimantan 92
Table 22: Scale Items and Descriptive Statistics 93
Table 23: Research Constructs and Its Description for West Kalimantan Study 96
Table 24: Measurement Model (CFA) for All Variables (Constructs) 103
Table 25 : Factor Loading of Items for Car 104
Table 26 : Factor Loading of Items for Noodle 105
Table 27 : AVE and CR for Car 106
Table 28: AVE and CR for Noodle 107
Table 29: Correlations of Constructs for Car 107
Table 30: Correlations of Constructs for Noodle 108
Table 31: Underlying Hypotheses for Structural Equation Modeling 109
Table 32: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships 111
Table 33: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships between Variables for Car based on
Ethnic Groups 111
xv
Table 34: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships 113
Table 35: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships between Variables for Car based on
Ethnic Groups 113
Table 36: Overall fit of Flexible Model for Car and Noodle 117
Table 37: Comparison Overall fit between Holistic and Flexible Model for Car 118
Table 38: Comparison Overall fit between Holistic and Flexible Model for Noodle 118
Table 39: Profile of Respondents 126
Table 40: Scale Items and Descriptive Statistics 127
Table 41: Research Constructs and Its Description for Sarawak Study 129
Table 42: Final CFA Result of All measurement model 135
Table 43: Factor Loading of Items for Car 136
Table 44: Factor Loading of Items for Noodle 137
Table 45: AVE and CR for Car 139
Table 46: AVE and CR for Noodle 139
Table 47: Correlations of Constructs for Car 139
Table 48: Correlations of Constructs for Noodles 140
Table 49: Underlying Hypotheses for Structural Equation Modelling 141
Table 50: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships for Car 143
Table 51: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships between Variables for Car based on
Ethnic Groups 143
xvi
Table 52: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships for Noodle 145
Table 53: Findings for Hypothesized Relationships between Variables for Car based on
Ethnic Groups 145
Table 54: Overall fit of Flexible Model for Car and Noodle 149
Table 55: Comparison Overall fit between Holistic and Flexible Model for Car 150
Table 56: Comparison Overall fit between Holistic and Flexible Model for Noodle 150
xvii
List of Figures
Figure 1: Map of Borneo which includes Sarawak-Malaysia and West Kalimantan 11
Figure 2: Halo Model 54
Figure 3: Summary Construct Model 55
Figure 4: Flexible Model 57
Figure 5: Conceptual Model to diagnose the influences of Consumer ethnocentrism, COI,
Beliefs on Attitudes. 58
Figure 6: Process of Two Step Approach in SEM 82
Figure 7: A SEM model with direct and indirect effect example 89
Figure 8: Initial Measurement Model (CFA) for Ethnocentric (EC) 99
Figure 9: Final CFA of Measurement Model for Ethnocentric (EC) 101
Figure 10: Final Structural Model for Car 110
Figure 11: Final Structural Model for Noodle 112
Figure 12: Structural Model of Flexible Model for Car 115
Figure 13: Structural Model of Flexible Model for Noodle 116
Figure 14: COIM mediates EC-BP Linkage for Car 119
Figure 15: COIM and BP mediate EC-ACM Linkage 120
Figure 16: BP mediates COIM-ACM Linkage for Car 122
Figure 17: COI mediates EC-Beliefs of Maggi (BM) Linkage for Noodle 123
xviii
Figure 18: COIM and BM mediate EC-ANM Linkage for Noodle 124
Figure 19: BP mediates COI-ANM Linkage for Car 125
Figure 20: Final Measurement Model (CFA) for Ethnocentric (EC) 133
Figure 21: Final Result of Structural Model for Car 142
Figure 22: Final Result of Structural Model for Noodle 144
Figure 23: Structural Model of Flexible Model for Car 147
Figure 24: Structural Model of Flexible Model for Noodle 148
Figure 25: COII mediates EC-BK Linkage for Car 151
Figure 26: COII and BK mediate EC-ACI Linkage for Car 152
Figure 27: BK mediates COII-ACI Linkage for Car 153
Figure 28: COI mediate EC-Belief (BS) Linkage for Noodle 154
Figure 29: COI and Beliefs mediate EC-ACM Linkage for Noodle 155
Figure 30: BP mediates COI-ACM Linkage for Car 156
xix
List of Abbreviations
COO Country of Origin
COI Country of Origin Image
CI Country Image
CE Consumer Ethnocentrism
EC Ethnocentric as symbol for SEM
COII Country of Origin Image of Indonesia
COIM Country of Origin Image of Malaysia
BK Beliefs on Toyota Kijang
BP Beliefs on Proton Car
BS Beliefs on Mi Sedaap
BM Beliefs on Mi Maggi
ACI Attitude toward Car from Indonesia
ACM Attitude toward Car from Malaysia
ANI Attitude toward Noodle from Indonesia
ANM Attitude toward Noodle from Malaysia
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
The globalization of business and marketing has provided consumers in all over the
world, with many options to purchase products. The situation is more complex especially in
the area where the regions as part of the share lands and boundaries between countries like
Sarawak-Malaysia and West Kalimantan-Indonesia (Blatter, 2000; Ghosh, 2011). In these
regions (Sarawak-Malaysia and West Kalimantan-Indonesia), products from both sides can
be found easily. People in these regions also already had familiarity and attitude about both
sides and their products (Awang et al., 2013). This phenomenon makes the study of
consumers’ attitude toward foreign made products more important to be studied (Kaynak &
Kara, 2002; Netemeyer et al., 1991).
Table 1 show the statistic of Export-Import between Sarawak and Kalimantan can be
seen as follows:
Table 1: Sarawak Import-Export to Kalimantan 2005-2011
YEAR KALIMANTAN
IMPORT (RM) EXPORT (RM)
2005 156,061,903 58,825,409
2006 180,121,305 74,712,135
2007 266,642,681 115,966,226
2008 88,526,211 120,332,168
2009 74,248,337 67,071,508
2010 79,814,989 144,185,495
2011 54,691,049 174,148,153
Source: Department of Statistics, Malaysia 2011
2
The value of imports from Sarawak (Malaysia) to Kalimantan (Indonesia) was reduced from
2005 to 2011. However, the exports of Sarawak (Malaysia) to Kalimantan (Indonesia) was
increased significantly and reached RM174,148,153 in 2011 mainly dominated by food
(71,58%) and Beverage (14,41%).
In international marketing literatures and theories, attention had been given to
examining how consumers form their attitudes and evaluate the foreign countries products.
There are two main factors that can influence consumer attitudes and purchase decisions,
which are the image of country-of-origin of product (country image) and consumer
ethnocentrism. Most of the studies validated the existence of the country image and
consumer ethnocentrism effects on consumer attitudes and product evaluation (Acharya &
Elliott, 2001; Peterson & Jolibert, 1995; Samiee, 1994; Schooler, 1965). Several issues also
have been considered, including product involvement, buyer’s involvement, familiarity with
a product category, knowledge of a particular country, cross-cultures, knowledge of product
and the presence of other extrinsic product information cues (Johansson, 1989; Knight &
Calantone, 2000).
Country of origin image (COI) or country image is the overall picture, or perception,
of consumers toward a country or toward products originating from a particular country
(Erickson et al., 1984; Han, 1986, 1989; Haubl, 1996; Parameswaran & Yaprak, 1987).
Country-of-origin image (COI) also refers to consumer perceptions of products from a
particular country. These perceptions may be based on prior perceptions of the country’s
production and marketing strengths and weaknesses (Roth & Romeo, 1992). Since it was
first reviewed by Ditcher (1962), an up to date assessment of the study of Country-of-origin
3
image (COI) has become a major stream for theory and practice in the field of global and
international marketing. Many evidences have shown how Country-of-origin image (COI)
can affect the consumer attitude in evaluating products (Bilkey & Nes, 1982; Eroglu &
Machleit, 1989; Han, 1989; Han & Terpstra, 1988; Roth & Romeo, 1992; Tse & Gorn,
1993).
Consumers provide different views on products originating from different countries
(Baughn & Yaprak, 1993; Jaffe & Nebenzahl, 2001; Liefeld, 1993; Verlegh & Steenkamp,
1999). These views may be obtained from information relevant to Country-of-origin image
(COI) from numerous sources, such as education, the media, travel, marketing cues, and
origin associations. The origin associations may have been provided through made-in labels,
brand names, advertising, packaging, and other parts of the marketing mix. Liefeld (1993)
concluded that Country-of-origin image (COI) appears to influence the consumer attitudes
and evaluate product quality, risk, likelihood of purchase, and other mediating variables. The
nature and strength of the country of origin image effects depend on such factors as the
product category, product involvement, the product stimulus employed in the research,
respondent demographics, consumer prior knowledge, experience with the product category,
the number of information cues included in the study, and consumer information processing
manners.
In evaluating a product, different information cues about a product are deemed to be
important and utilized. Consumers are thought to make inferences about the value of product
information cues as a quality indicator and then combine judgments of all the cues available
in order to obtain an overall product evaluation (Jacoby et al., 1971). According to this