Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Image by Ramy Raoof
The Central ParadoxThe Central Paradox
Wh i i h i i hi h• Why is it that in an era in which transportation and communication costs have virtually vanished cities have becomehave virtually vanished, cities have become more important than ever?
• Urban resurgence is visible in high income• Urban resurgence is visible in high income levels, robust housing prices, and a concentration of innovation in urban areas.concentration of innovation in urban areas.
• This is even clearer in the developing world.
The Near Perfect Correlation between b i i dUrbanization and Income
% population urban 1998, WDI200 Fitted values
100 Hong KonBelgiumSingapor
VenezuelUnited K
Germany,
Peru
Brazil Korea
FranceCanadaMexico
Argentin
TurkeyJordan
Iceland
New Zeal
Belgium
Saudi Ar
Bahrain
Australi
SpainNorway
Israel Luxembou
United S
NetherlaMalta
Colombia
Gabon
United ADenmarkSweden
Japan
Chile
Trinidad
UruguayBahamas,
50
Poland
Philippi
Honduras
Italy
Cote d'I
South af
Bolivia
Egypt El Salva
MauritanGreece
Nicaragu
Fiji
Morocco
Hungary
Malaysia
Finland
Paraguay
EcuadorSwitzerl
Cameroon
Portugal
Syria
TunisiaDominica
CyprusAlgeriaIran, I.
Senegal
JamaicaIreland
Panama
Costa Ri
CongoAustria
Botswana
Ghana GuatemalNigeria
Kenya
Cote d I
Angola
Indonesi
Tanzania Mali IndiaBanglade
Pakistan
Egypt
MozambiqZambia Central
GuineaSierra L
ComorosTogo
Thailand
Mauritiu
Niger
SwazilanLesotho
Guyana
Western MalawiGuinea-B
GambiaZimbabwe
Chad
MadagascChinaZaire
Benin
Sudan
Yemen, N
Haiti
Sri Lank
6 8 10
0
UgandaPapua NeEthiopia
Burundi
g
Nepal
Log of GDP 19986 8 10
12Figure 1: Output Per Worker and Area Size
Bridgepo
San Jose
AnchoragAnn Arbo Atlanta-
Boston-C
Charlott
ChicagoDallas-F
Denver-ADes Moin
Durham,Hartford Houston-
IndianapLafayettMidland
Naples-M
Ne Orle
New York
Philadel
San Fran
San Jose
Seattle-Si F
Trenton- Washingt
Winston-
11.5
r Wor
ker
Albany-SAlbuquer
gAnn ArboAtlantic
Augusta-
Austin-R Baltimor
Barnstab Baton RoBend OR
Birmingh
BloomingBoise Ci
Boulder,
B tBurlingt
Cape Cor
Cedar RaCharlestCharlott
Chattano
Chicago-
CincinnaClevelan
ColoradoColumbiaColumbus
Columbus
Dayton,Decatur,
Des MoinDetroit-
ElizabetElkhart-
El PEvansvil
Fargo N
FarmingtFayettev
FayettevFort Wal Fort WayGainesvi Grand RaGreen Ba
Greensbo
GreenvilGulfport
HarrisbuHarrison
Honolulu
Huntsvil
p
I CitJackson,
Jacksonv
JacksonvKansas C
Killeen- KnoxvillKokomo,
Lafayett
Lake Cha
Las Vega
Lawton,Lexingto
Lima, OHLincoln
Little R
Los Ange
LouisvilMacon, G
Madison,Manchest
Memphis,Miami-Fo
Midland,Milwauke
Minneapo
M t
Napa, CA Nashvill
New Have
New Orle
Norwich-Ocean Ci Oklahoma
Omaha-CoOrlando-
PhiladelPhoenix-
Pittsbur
PittsfiePortland
Portland
Providen
Raleigh-Reno-Spa Richmond
RoanokeRochesteRocheste
Rocky MoSacramen
S i
St. LouiSalinas,
Salt Lak
San Anto
San Dieg
Santa BaSanta Fe
S tSavannahSheboyga
Shrevepo
Sioux Ci
Sioux Fa
SpringfiSyracuse Tampa StToledo
Tulsa, O Virginia
Warner RWichita,Wilmingt
WorcesteOut
put P
er
Abilene,
Akron, OAlbany,
Alexandr
Allentow
Altoona,Amarillo
A i t
AppletonAshevillAthens-C
Augusta-
BakersfiBangor,
Barnstab Baton Ro
Battle CBeaumont
Bellingh
Bend, OR
Billings
Binghamt
BlacksbuBlooming
Blooming
Bowling
BremertoBuffalo-
Burlingt Canton-MChampaig
Charlest
Chico C
ClarksviClevelan
CollegeColumbia
Corpus C
Dalton,Davenpor
Decatur,Deltona-Dothan,
Dover, D
Duluth,Eau ClaiEl Centr
El Paso,
Erie, PAEugene-S
Fargo, NFlint, MFlorence
Fort ColFort Smi
Fresno,
GainesviGoldsbor
Grand Ju
Greeley,GreenvilHagerstoHanford-Hattiesb
Hickory-
Holland-
Houma-Ba
Huntingt
Iowa Cit
Jackson,Jackson,Janesvil
Jefferso
JohnsonJohnstowJonesborJoplin,
Kalamazo
Kennewicee
KingsporLa CrossLafayett
LakelandLancasteLansing-
Laredo,
Lincoln,
LongviewLubbock,
Lynchbur
,
Mansfiel
Medford,Michigan Mobile,
Modesto,
Monroe,
MontgomeMorgantoMount Ve
Muncie,
M k
Myrtle B
Niles-Be
Ocala F
Ocean Ci
Odessa,
Ogden-Cl
Olympia,Oshkosh-
Owensbor
Oxnard-TPalm BayPanama C
ParkersbPensacol
Peoria,
Pine Blu Port St.Poughkee
Providen
Provo-OrPueblo,
Racine,
Rapid CiReading,
Redding, Riversid
Roanoke,Rocheste
Rockford
Saginaw-
St. ClouSt. JoseSalem, O
San Ange
San Anto
San LuisSanta CrSanta RoSarasotaSavannah
Scranton
SebastiaSheboyga
Sherman-
Sioux Ci
South BeSpartanbSpokane,
SpringfiSpringfi
Springfi
State Co
StocktonSumter,
Syracuse
Tallahas
Tampa-St
Terre HaTexarkan
Toledo,
Topeka, Tucson,Tuscaloo
Tyler, T
Utica Ro
ValdostaVictoriaVineland
Waco, TX
Warner RWaterlooWausau,
Weirton-Wheeling
WichitaWilliams
Winchest Worceste
Yakima
York-HanYoungsto
Yuba Cit
11Lo
g O
,AndersonAndersonAnnistonAuburn-OBay City
Brownsvi
Chico, CCoeur d'
College
CumberlaDanville
El CentrFlagstaf
FlorenceGadsden,
Glens FaIdaho FaJohnstow
Kankakee
Kingston
Lake Hav
Las CrucLebanon,
LewistonLogan, U
Madera,McAllen-
Merced,Monroe,
MorristoMuskegonOcala, FOgden Cl
PascagouPrescott
Punta GoSalisburSpringfi Utica-Ro
Vallejo-Visalia-
gYakima,
Yuma, AZ
10.5
12 14 16 18Log population, 2000
New YorkNew York
• New York’s explosive era from 1790 (33,000) to 1860 p ( , )(813,000)– note no clear break with the Erie Canal.
• Between 1790 and 1850, the U.S. switches from h h b d k d lpoint‐to‐point shipping to a hub and spoke model
• In the early 1820s, packet ships typically carried between 300 and 400 tons.
• By 1838, 1000 tons became normal and the Amazon carried 1771 tons in 1854 (Albion, 1970).
• New York’s manufacturing growth is an outgrowth of• New York s manufacturing growth is an outgrowth of its role in trade: garments, publishing and sugar–ultimately finance
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.
Image by Andrew Jameson
The Decline of the Costs of Moving GoodsThe Decline of the Costs of Moving Goods
.185063
Rea
l)r T
on M
ile (R
Dol
lars
per
.02323
Railroad Revenue per Ton Mileyear
1890 2000
Heat‐Biased Technological Change andh hthe Move to Warmth
Log Change in Population 1980-2 Fitted values
Las Vega
1
Austin S
.5
Atlanta,
Austin-S
BakersfiDallas-F
Fresno,
Orlando,Phoenix-
Raleigh-
SacramenSarasota
Stockton Tucson
West Pal
Albuquer
Allentow
Augusta-
Baton RoCharlest
Charlott
ColumbiaColumbus
Corpus C
Denver-B
Des Moin
El Paso,
es o,
Grand Ra GreensboGreenvil
H l l
Houston-
Indianap Jackson,
Jacksonv
Kansas CKnoxvill
Lafayett
LancasteLexingtoLittle R
Los Ange
Memphis,
Miami-Fo
Minneapo
Mobile,
Nashvill
Norfolk-Oklahoma
Omaha, N
Portland
Richmond
Salt Lak San AntoSan Dieg
San Fran
Seattle-
Spokane,
Tampa-St
Tucson,
Tulsa, O
Washingt
Wichita,
0Albany-S
Allentow
Beaumont
BirminghBoston-W
Buffalo-
Canton-M
ChattanoChicago- Cincinna
Clevelan
Corpus C
Davenpor
Dayton-SDetroit-
Fort WayHarrisbuHartford
Honolulu
Huntingt
Johnson Kalamazo
Lafayett
Lansing- LouisvilMilwauke New HaveNew Orle
New York,
Peoria-P
Philadel
Pittsbur
ProvidenRocheste
Rockford
Saginaw-
St. Loui
Scranton
ShrevepoSpringfiSyracuseToledo,
Youngsto
Figure 24: 1980-2000 Population Growth and Mean January Tmp.January mean temperature 1980
0 20 40 60 80
City 1950 Pop. 2000 Pop. ChangeN Y k 7 891 957 8 008 278 +1 5 %New York 7,891,957 8,008,278 +1.5 %Chicago 3.620,962 2,896,016 -20%
Philadelphia 2,071,605 1,517,550 -27%Los Angeles 1,970,358 3,694,820 +87%g , , , ,Detroit 1,849,568 951,270 -52%Baltimore 949 708 651 154 32%Baltimore 949,708 651,154 -32%Cleveland 914,808 478,403 -48%St. Louis 856,796 348,189 -60%Washington 802,178 572,059 -29%Boston 801,444 589,141 -26%
Norilsk (25% down 1989‐2002)Norilsk (25% down 1989 2002)
The Rebirth of NYC, ChicagoThe Rebirth of NYC, Chicago
• Some erstwhile manufacturing centers continue So e e st e a u actu g ce te s co t ueto decline, while others reinvent.
• People and ideas thrive; People movers don’tp p• Finance in New York and an urban chain of ideas
– Understanding risk and return with data– The sale of riskier assets (Milken)– The use of risky assets to restructure companies (KKR)– The nationwide sharing of risk (Ranieri and MBSs)– The sale of data tools (Bloomberg)
Change in Population, 1970-2000 Figure 7:
.82000
g p ,by Quintile of Percent College Graduates, 1970
6on, 1
970-
24
.P
opul
ati o
2.4
Cha
nge
in
0.2
Mea
n C
0
Lowest Second Third Fourth HighestSource: U.S. Census Bureau
Figure 4: Population Growth for MSAs in the Northeast and Midwest
60%
53%
50%
000
40%
wth
(197
0-20
20%
30%
pula
tion
Gro
8%
15% 15%
20%
10%
20%
Ave
rage
Pop
8%
0%
10%A
0 - 7.5% 7.5% - 9.5% 9.5% - 11% 11% - 15% 15%-31%
Percent of Population with a BA (1970)Data from the United States Census
Log Wage Residual 2000 Fitted values
10.2Minneapo
New York
Atlanta-Austin-R
Charlott
IndianapKansas CRichmond
San FranWest Pal
10 Albany-S
AlbAllentow
Columbia
Columbus
Dayton,
Fort WayGrand RaGreensbo
Harrisbu
HonoluluLancaste
Las Vega
Louisvil
NashvillOmaha-Co
Orlando,
Phoenix-Richmond
Salt Lak
San DiegSt. Loui
Toledo Tulsa O
Wichita,
9.8
Albuquer
Baton RoBirmingh
Buffalo-Canton-M
Charlest Chicago-
Jackson,Knoxvill
Little R
N O lOklahoma
PittsburRocheste
San AntoSpokane,Stockton
Syracuse Tampa-StToledo,
Tucson,
Tulsa, O
Youngsto9 8
BakersfiFresno,
Memphis, New Orle
.05 .1 .15
9.6
Figure 42000 Share of Skilled Workers
.05 .1 .15
1.5
Human Capital Spillovers in India1
1st
rict
.5id
ual i
n di
0w
age
res
-.5Av
erag
e -1
0 05 1 15 2 250 .05 .1 .15 .2 .25Fraction of people with higher education diploma
Sources: Indian Human Development Survey 2005 and Indian General Census 2001 (graph includes 221 observations)
Unemployment and EducationUnemployment and Education21.7 Merced,
Yuba Cit
Bakersfi
Fresno, Modesto,
Redding,
Rockford
Salinas,StocktonVisalia-
Yuma, AZ
unem
p
Atlantic
B t b
Canton-M
Ch l tt
Chico, CDecatur,
Deltona-
Detroit-Elkhart-Flint, M
Florence
Hickory-Jackson,
J il
Kankakee
Kokomo, LakelandLas VegaMansfiel Medford,
Myrtle B
Ocala, F
ProvidenPunta Go Reno-Spa
RiversidRocky Mo
Sacramen
Saginaw-Santa Cr
Sumter,
Tampa-StToledo,
Vallejo-
VinelandSteubenv
Youngsto
jan1
0u
Akron, OAlbany,
Allentow
Ann Arbo
Anniston
AshevillAtlanta-Auburn-O
Augusta-
Barnstab
Beaumont
BellinghBinghamt
Birmingh
Blooming
Boise Ci
Boston-C
Brownsvi
Buffalo
Champaig
Charlest
Charlest
Charlott
Chattano
Cheyenne
Chicago-
CincinnaClarksvi
Clevelan ColumbiaColumbusColumbus
Cumberla
Danville
Davenpor
Dayton, Decatur,Deltona-
Dothan,
Dover, DDuluthEl Paso,
Elmira,
Erie, PA
Eugene-S
EvansvilFayettev
Flagstaf
Florence
Fort Way
Gadsden,
Glens FaGoldsbor Grand Ju
Grand Ra
Greeley,G
Greensbo
GreenvilGreenvil
Hagersto
HartfordHattiesbHuntingt HuntsvilIndianapJackson,
Jackson,JacksonvJanesvil
Johnson Johnstow
Kalamazo
Kansas CKnoxvill Lafayett
Lansing-
Laredo, Lewiston Lexingto
Lima, OH Los Ange
LouisvilMacon, G
McAllen-
Memphis,Miami-Fo
Milwauke
Mobile,
MontgomeMuncie,
Naples-M
Nashvill New HaveNew YorkOdessa
Orlando-
Owensbor
Panama CParkersb Pensacol
PhiladelPhoenix
Pine Blu PittsfiePocatell
Portland
Pueblo,
Racine,
Raleigh-Reading,
Sacramen
Salem, OSan Dieg San Fran
San Jose
San LuisSanta Ba
Santa Ro
Savannah
ScrantonSeattle-Sheboyga
South Be
Spokane,Springfi
Springfi
S f
St. Loui
Syracuse
Tampa St
Terre Ha
Tuscaloo
Vallejo-
Wausau,
WheelingWilliams
WilmingtYakima,
York-Han
Abilene,
Albany-S
Albuquer
Alexandr
Altoona,
Amarillo
Anchorag
Ann ArboAppletonAthens-C
Austin-R
BaltimorBangor, Baton Ro
g
Billings
Blooming
Boston C
Boulder,
Bremerto
Buffalo-
Burlingt
Casper,
Cedar Ra
Charlest
Charlott
Cheyenne Colorado
Columbia
Corpus CCorvalli
Dallas-FDenver-A
Des Moin
,
Dubuque,
Duluth, Eau Clai
,Evansvil
Fayettev
Flagstaf
Fort Col
Fort Smi Gainesvi
Great Fa
Green BaHarrisbu
HonoluluHouma-Ba
Houston-g HuntsvilIndianap
JacksonvJonesborJoplin,
Kansas C
Killeen-
Knoxvill
La Cross
Lafayett
Lake ChaLancasteLas Cruc
LawrenceLawton,
Lewiston Lexingto
Little R
Longview
Lubbock,
Lynchbur
Madison,
MinneapoMissoula
Monroe, New Orle
Odessa,
Oklahoma
Olympia,
Omaha-Co
Phoenix-Pittsbur
PortlandProvo-Or
Rapid Ci
RichmondRoanoke,
Rocheste
Rocheste
Salt LakSan AngeSan Anto Santa Fe
SavannahSherman-
Shrevepo
Sioux Ci
Sioux Fa
SpringfiSt. Clou
St. Jose
State Co
Syracuse Tallahas
TexarkanTopeka,
Trenton-Tucson,
Tulsa, OTyler, TUtica-Ro
Victoria
Waco, TXWashingtWaterloo
Wichita Wichita,
College completion among populat.110482 .523833
4.8 Bismarck Fargo, NGrand Fo Iowa CitLincoln,
ap d CSioux Fa
Average Employment Growth, 1977-2000Figure 10:
1.5
2000
g p y ,by Quintile of Average Firm Size, 1977
wth
, 197
7-2
1m
ent G
row
.5 E
mpl
oym
0Av
erag
e0
Lowest Second Third Fourth HighestSource: County Business Patterns, 1977 and 2000
Defeating Density’s Demons lets h l hthe Consumer City Flourish
• The same innovations that help NYC financeThe same innovations that help NYC finance help NYC restaurants and retail.
• Urban scale abets specialization (all those nail• Urban scale abets specialization (all those nail salons) and activities with fixed costs (theaters museums)(theaters, museums).
• History has left NYC with great physical assets.
• But it’s the people that really make the city exciting– city as marriage market.
Prices and Permits across L M li A0
Figure 13:Median Housing Values in 2005
and Permits 2000 2005 Across MSAsLarger Metropolitan Areas
San Jose
8000
005
and Permits 2000-2005 Across MSAs
Los AngelesSan Diego
San FranciscoSan Jose
6000
00al
ue, 2
005
Honolulu
L V
New York
ProvidenceRiverside
Sacramento
S ttl
Stockton
VallejoWashington
W t
4000
00H
ousi
ng V
a
AkronAlbany AlbuquerqueAllentownAnn Arbor
AtlantaAustinBakersfield
Baltimore
Baton RougeBirminghamBoston
B ff l
CharlestonCharlotte
Chicago
CincinnatiCleveland
ClevelandColorado Springs
ColumbiaColumbusDallasDayton
Denver
Detroit
F t W
Fresno
Grand RapidsGreensboroGreenvilleHarrisburg
Hartford CT
HoustonIndianapolisJacksonvilleKansas CityKnoxville
Las Vegas
Little RockLouisvilleMemphis
Miami
MilwaukeeMinneapolis
M bilNashville
New Haven
New OrleansOklahoma City
OmahaOrlandoPhiladelphia Phoenix
Pittsburgh
Portland
Providence
RaleighRichmond
Rochester
Salt Lake City
S A t i
Sarasota
Scranton
Seattle
SpringfieldSt. Louis
S
TampaToledo
Tucson
TulsaWi hit
Worcester
Y t Little Rock
2000
00M
edia
n H
Baton RougeBirminghamBuffaloCleveland ColumbiayEl PasoFort WayneGreenvilleLittle Rock
McAllenMemphisMobileOklahoma CityPittsburghRochester San AntonioScrantonSyracuse TulsaWichitaYoungstown Little Rock
0
0 1 2 30 .1 .2 .3Permits 2000-5/Stock in 2000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Image by QuarterCircleS
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.