Upload
kayla-maldonado
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Image BioInformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
University of Oxford, UK
http:/ibrg.zoo.ox.ac.uk
PRO and PSO, the PublishingRoles and Statuses Ontologies
© David Shotton, 2012 Published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Licence
e-mail: [email protected]
David Shotton and Silvio Peroni
The requirement – time-constrained relationships
‘Editor’ is a role in the relationship between a person and a document
‘Under review’ is a possible status of a document in the publishing workflow
Such roles and statuses may hold only during a defined period of time, and may also be contingent on events controlled by agents – such as the editor sending the document to a reviewer
We need a generic straightforward way to encode such time-constrained roles and statuses in RDF
The problem – such encoding is not trivial in RDF
Because of the sheer simplicity of the subject-predicate-object triple, OWL ontologies and RDF-based models are not able to handle qualifications such as time periods and contexts directly
Instead we need a workaround such as reification or, more generally, an n-ary description
Ontological patterns have been developed to address this issue
For example, by using the time-indexed situation pattern
(http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeindexedsituation.owl),
it becomes possible to link a subject to a time-dependent situation
Encoding Publishing Roles
We have previously used this time-indexed situation pattern to create
PRO, the Publishing Roles Ontology (http://purl.org/spar/pro/)
PRO permit roles of people (e.g. editor, reviewer) to be encoded for specific periods of time, and in relationship to particular organizations or documents
Diagrammatic representation of PRO
Encoding Publishing Roles
:shotton a foaf:Person
; pro:holdsRoleInTime [ a pro:RoleInTime
; pro:withRole pro:author
; pro:relatesToDocument :adventures-in-semantic-publishing ] .
If we look just at the core of this ontology, we see that this ontology pattern has two important advantages:
First, it relates the subject directly to its role in time
Second, it permits new roles to be specified simply by adding new individuals as members of the class pro:Role, without having to modify the ontology
This is much simpler that having to add a new ‘relationship’ class for each new role
Diagrammatic representation of PSO
We have similarly used this time-indexed situation pattern to create
PSO, the Publishing Status Ontology (http://purl.org/spar/pso/)
.
Encoding Publishing Statuses
Here, a document status, such as being under review, can be associated with an event related to an agent, for example the event of sending the paper to a reviewer by an editor, and with a particular timespan of the reviewing process
:adventures-in-semantic-publishing a foaf:Document
; pso:holdsStatusInTime [ a pso:StatusInTime
; pso:withStatus pso:under-review
; pso:isAcquiredAsAConsequenceOf [ a part:Event
; rdfs:label “The sending of the paper to a reviewer”
; part:hasParticipant [ a pso:Agent
; pro:holdsRoleInTime [ a pro:RoleInTime
; pro:withRole pro:editor
; pro:relatesToDocument :adventures-in-semantic-publishing ] ]
; tisit:atTime [ a ti:TimeInterval
; ti:hasIntervalStartDate
“2008-01-13T00:00:00”xsd:dateTime
; ti:hasIntervalEndDate
“2009-03-09T00:00:00”xsd:dateTime ] ] .
CERRO, the CERIF Roles and Relationships Ontology
CERIF is the Common European Research Information Framework
As a contribution to CERIF, we have now used exactly this same ontology design pattern to create CERRO, the CERIF Roles and Relationships Ontology
CERRO is available at http://purl.org/cerif/cerro
CERRO complements and extends the draft CERIF and SEMCERIF ontologies developed by the Linked Data Task Group of euroCRIS
We have proposed the adoption of CERRO in a document available at http://imageweb.zoo.ox.ac.uk/pub/2012/cerif/Shotton-Peroni_Proposal-for-CERRO-the-CERIF-Relationships-Ontology.docx
Diagrammatic representation of CERRO CERRO
CERRO Roles, and using roles as object properties
CERRO contains 69 relationships, for example
cerro:author - with respect to a paper, a publisher, etc.
cerro:data-manager - with respect to a project, a dataset, etc.
cerro:principal investigator - with respect to a project, an institution, etc.
CERRO used the OWL 2 DL capabilities for meta-modelling (known as OWL punning)
This permits the individuals of a class cerro:Relationship also to be represented as object properties in the CERRO ontology
This has the advantage that
if one does not need to employ cerro:RelationshipInTime in order to specify temporal constraints on a relationship
the relationship can be used directly as an object property to relate the subject to the object
Examples of CERRO usage
:shotton a cerif:Person
; cerro:holdsRelationshipInTime [ a cerro:RelationshipInTime
; cerro:withRelationship cerro:principal-investigator
; cerro:linksToObjectEntity [ a cerif:Project
; dcterms:title “The Open Citation Project”
; foaf:homePage <http://opencitations.net> ]
; tisit:atTime [ a ti:TimeInterval
; ti:hasIntervalStartDate
“2010-06-16T00:00:00”xsd:dateTime
; ti:hasIntervalEndDate
“2011-06-16T00:00:00”xsd:dateTime ] ] .
Clear, direct and unambiguous
:shotton a cerif:Person
; cerro:principal-investigator [ a cerif:Project
; foaf:homePage <http://opencitations.net> ] .
Advantages of using CERRO
The time-indexed relationship is associated directly with a cerif:CoreEntity
The time-indexed relationship is held directly with respect to another cerif:Entity
The starting and ending times refer directly to the cerro:RelationshipInTime
There is no need to specify a new additional indirect ‘linking’ URI for each pair of entities to be linked, with which URI the times are associated
There is no need to specify many different link properties, one for each type of relationship, e.g. cerif:isLinkedByPerson, cerif:isLinkedToProject
A new relationship can easily be specified by adding a new individual to the class cerro:Relationship, without having to change the structure of the ontology
CERRO is complete, published on SourceForge, open source and ready to use
All classes and properties are fully defined and appropriately restricted
The ontology is written in validated OWL 2 DL
CERRO is designed to be used with the draft CERIF and SEMCERIF ontologies