IMA-Europe 2013 Annual Report

Product Stewardship

IMA EuropeAnnuAl RepoRt 2013

Environment

Industrial MineralsYour World is Made of Them

Industrial Affairs

Copyright © 2013Industrial Minerals Association Europe aisblAll rights reserved. Content is subject to copyright. Any use and re-use requires approval.

www.ima-europe.eu | Page 3

A YEAR AT A GLANCE

INDUSTRIAL AFFAIRS

ENVIRONMENT

PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP

COMMUNICATION

IMA-EUROPE STRUCTURE

04

06

Raw Materials and Industrial policy 07

Climate Change 12

Innovation 13

16

Revision of the environmental Impact Assessment (eIA) Directive 17

european Fund for Industrial Accidents 18

Ambient Air policy and Industrial emissions 19

Biodiversity 20

IMA-europe life Cycle Inventory (IMA lCI) 21

Review of Waste policy and legislation 23

24

Respirable Crystalline Silica 25

Accident Reduction 26

nanomaterials 26

Chemical policy 27

Minerals in Agriculture 28

30

european Minerals Day 2013 – A new Dimension 30

other 2013 Communication Achievements 31

32

TABLE OF ContentS

Daniel J. Reuss President

At the end of 2012, the IMA-Europe Presidency changed, and Thierry Salmona (Imerys) handed over his mandate to Daniel J. Reuss (Omya). We hereby wish to express our warm appreciation to Thierry for his dedication and excel-lent management during the four years of his Presidency.

Looking at IMA-Europe activity since our 2012 General As-sembly gives us reasons for satisfaction. In this short period, the Association and the sector have driven a number of prominent initiatives, contributed to a couple of projects and built various positions with real success while maintaining at the same time a close and dynamic cooperation with the various concerned sister- and users’ associations. We high-light the progress made in this Annual Report, but just let us mention a few.

IMA-Europe takes an active part in shaping the Europe-an Raw Materials policy to come. First, thanks to a strong presence in all governance bodies of the European Innova-tion Partnership on Raw Materials (EIP RM) and Jean-Luc Deleersnyder (Sibelco CEO) representing the Industrial Min-erals industry in its High Level Steering Group. This allows IMA-Europe to ensure that the EIP Strategic Innovation Plan to be endorsed in September reflects the interests of the sector. Benefiting from the high profile of the European Minerals Day (EMD) and the appraisal by the Institutions of this industry-led initiative, IMA-Europe took advantage of the 2013 EMD edition to embark many EIP RM stakeholdersin a round of prominent events, widely attended in the

A YEAR AT A GlAnCe

Page 4

Michelle Wyart Remy Secretary General

Brussels European Parliament. The attention on the mineral industry culminated with the EMD launch event supported by Commission Vice-President Antonio Tajani who visited the Omya calcium carbonate mine in Vipiteno (Italy).

IMA-Europe also contributes to other European projects ensuing from the Raw Materials Initiative, such as the update of the Critical Raw Materials list, the development of a pan-European (statistical) database on Raw Materials deposits (Minventory). IMA-Europe also committed to ac-tively contributing to Innovation projects; first in being one of the founding members of A-SPIRE (the Association of Sustainable Process Industries through Resource & Energy Efficiency) and also in running the Working Package “Dis-semination and Exploitation” of the FP7 funded project “STOICISM”, led by Imerys.

Finally, at the eve of IMA-Europe 20th anniversary, we started the ambitious project to draft an Industrial Minerals sector Roadmap to be finalised first half of 2014. Aiming at docu-menting the sector’s future and addressing the challenges set by the EU 2020 and beyond Growth Strategy, the Roadmap will particularly focus on Resource Efficiency and the role of industrial minerals in a green and low carbon economy.

It is thanks to the knowledgeable support of the IMA-Europe Members and experts and the IMA Secretariat team that all these activities were successfully completed and we would like to warmly thank all of them.

With sadness, we would like to pay tribute with this Ac-tivity Report to Dan Germiquet, Chief Geologist at Imerys, who tragically passed away in a train accident last August. His expertise and friendship will be missed by all in indus-try who knew him. We would also like to pay tribute to Michel Denys (Carmeuse), former Chairman of the IMA Environment Committee, who passed away in May this year. His expertise and kindness will be missed.


INDUSTRIAL AFFAIRS

Page 6

Raw Materials and Industrial policy

Climate Change

Innovation

Since the publication of the Raw Materials Initiative in 20081, the focus on raw materials in the EU has steadily increased. In addition to the European Innovation Partner-ship on Raw Materials (see under “Innovation” below), a number of initiatives were pursued. We report on those of interest which IMA-Europe closely follows. A general insight is always possible through our long-lasting participation to DG Enterprise Raw Materials Supply Group (RMSG) which in 2012 reinforced its rules for stakeholders’ participation through a call for applications for membership. The aim was to better balance the group with regards to non-industry interest (academia, NGOs, and research institutes dealing with resources). It must also be noted that recently the for-est-based (wood and paper) and rubber industries have in-tegrated the F3 Resource-based industries Unit headed by Mattia Pellegrini.

Interestingly, the Commission has just issued a call for ten-der to complete an overview on the competitiveness of the European mineral raw materials sector, i.e. non-energy ex-tractive industries (NEEI) and the related recycling industries (RI). Based on collected available data, the study should assess the impact of economic, environmental and other policies on the performance of the industry in a global con-text, taking into account the difference between Member States with regard to access to land and time-frame of the administrative procedures.

IM Roadmap

The IM Roadmap intends to communicate the IM sector vision for the future. It will not only address the challenges set by the EU 2020 and beyond Growth Strategy, but also aim at raising awareness of the essentiality of industrial minerals and their contribution to innovation and to a sustainable society. Having identified the most relevant areas for the IM sector, the Roadmap will focus on Resource Efficiency and the role of IM in achieving the targets set by the European Commission at EU level.

The Industrial Minerals (IM) Roadmap drafting committee has intensively been working on its development in the past months. Based on the outcome of the interactive Workshop organised in November 2012, the group has prepared a “dummy” Roadmap that will soon be circulated for consultation.

The global megatrends are used to put into perspective an expected increase in the raw materials’ demand in the future. In the same way, innovation and breakthrough technologies will be key to the sector’s resource efficiency. For the IM industry’s contribution to be successful and for the sector to be a winner in this transitional period, a number of necessary measures will be highlighted in form of policy recommendations.


Raw Materials and Industrial Policy

1 COM(2008)699 Communication “The Raw Materials Initiative - Meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe”

In view of IMA-Europe’s 20th anniversary, the drafting com-mittee will intensify its activities to ensure the finalisation of the IM Roadmap during the first half of 2014.

Review of the Critical Raw Materials (CRM) list

Over recent years, the issue of securing reliable and undistort-ed access to non-energy raw materials has become central. One of the actions of the Raw Materials Initiative was to identify Critical Raw Materials for the EU. The aim is to create a common European list of critical non-energy raw materials (i.e. excluding oil, gas, nuclear fuels etc.) reflecting their relative importance and supply risks to the EU. The work confided in 2009 to an ad-hoc working group supported by external consultants, was published in 2010 with a recom-mendation to revise the CRM list every three years.

It should be noted that the analysis applies to all non-energy raw materials, not simply those experiencing high demand or immediate concerns. Therefore and as acknowledged by the Commission, IMA-Europe was an active contributor to the work and is again on board for this update which aims not only at revising, but also improving and extending on the previous analysis.

The project is led by Oakdene Hollins and supported by Fraunhofer ISI and Roskill Information Services. The support of IMA-Europe experts across the membership is needed to collect and review the data required for the analysis.

Minventory - Statistical Information on eu Raw Materials Deposits

National geology survey data on reserve/resources are in most cases not able to confirm the economic status of reserves by distinguishing materials for potential end markets. Additional industrial mineral geological expertise is required to refine and classify deposits accordingly. IMA-Europe has major concerns on the disclosure of company confidential information and the correct use of EU aggregated data for the purpose of Minventory which stands for “Statistical In-formation on Raw Materials Deposits”.

“Minventory”, is a collaboration project between ten European geological bodies which seeks to create a directory of primary/ secondary raw materials in the form of reserves and resources across Europe and a harmonised data repository by 2020 under the auspices of the European Commission. The use of the data directory will be three fold: 1. Valuable tool for land-use planning; 2. Ensure future technology development

policies and 3. Inform decision-makers regarding materials security and establish appropriate mitigation strategies. The Commission is keen to ensure broad participation, not least to ensure that the experience of the various other overlap-ping geological and resource initiatives is included, but also to check that the resulting directory has validity within the community of interest. The IMA-Europe secretariat attended the Stakeholder Workshop organised by the Commission on 14 May 2013 in Brussels. The experience from various geological surveys and the scope of the data collection for the EU was presented at this meeting, addressing the diffi-culties related to reporting under different codes.

IMA-Europe, with the support of Reserves & Resources Classification Experts, is keen to contribute to the project in order to monitor its developments, guide and inform DG ENTR and the consultants with respect to industry expectations,

Page 8

IMA Europe Industrial Affairs


Annual Report 2013 IMA Europe

the problems and limitations related to reserve and resource data collection on EU scale. Owen Herod from IMERYS is IMA-Europe’s reserve/resources expert in the Steering Com-mittee of Minventory. IMA-Europe and some of its members directly responded to the questionnaire from Oakdene Hollins, the UK-based consultant managing the project.

Commissioner for Industry Missions for Growth and Raw Materials Dialogues

Analysing that the fast growing emerging markets – which, according to estimates, will account for about 60% of world GDP by 2030 – are served by less than 10% of exporting European enterprises, DG Enterprise runs since end of 2011 “Missions for Growth”. Led by Vice-President Tajani to help European enterprises, in particular SMEs, to better profit from this huge market potential, Missions for Growth

(in European and third countries) are usually linked to renowned international brokerage events and involve po-litical and business meetings. Russia, China and, in the EU, Greece were recently visited, while Israel, Vietnam, Myan-mar and Thailand are on the coming month’s programme. Some IMA-Europe member companies joined a Mission for Growth trip.

As part of the EU Raw Materials dialogues, most of the in-ternational missions include raw materials in their focus. Therefore European industrial minerals companies are invited, through IMA-Europe, to express their interest in joining the mission as European delegates. IMA –Europe members and the Secretariat are regularly involved in the Raw Materials dialogues (EU-Russia, EU-China and EU-US-Japan). These allow for exchanges in areas of mutual interest in the fields of Enterprise & Industry policy, notably on critical raw materials assessment, resource efficiency and innovation.

IMA-europe Invited to launch of new Master programme on Georesources engineering

In view of addressing the need for skilled professionals within the extractive and processing European industry a 2-year Erasmus Mundus Master Programme “Georesources Engi-neering Emerald” will start for the following academic year as a collaboration between three European Universities: University of Lorraine (France), University of Liège (Belgium) and Luleå University of Technology (Sweden). The master pro-gramme, aims to find the right balance between knowledge of mineral resources (geology, resource characterization, re-serve estimation, modelling) and processing (communition, pre-concentration, leaching, waste disposal).

Strategic issues such as life cycle analysis of mineral resources, urban mining potential, economic, social and environmen-tal challenges of mining operations will be addressed within professional seminars. IMA-Europe has been invited to at-tend the opening ceremony that will take place on 20th of September 2013 at the Faculty of Applied Sciences at the University of Liège.

Resource efficiency

With the Resource Efficiency (RE) Roadmap, the European Commission has set up the path to change the EU’s eco-nomic model into a sustainable growth economy. It foresees increasing resource productivity and decoupling economic growth from the use of resources and their environmental impact. In order to be able to set targets and to evaluate

Page 10


and monitor the progress of the EU’s economy towards these, a number of RE indicators are being developed.

The first RE indicators proposed by the Commission were subject to a public consultation in 2012. The results of this consultation show that, as IMA-Europe pointed out, the lead indicator to measure “resource productivity” as a country’s GDP (Gross Domestic Product) divided by its Domestic Mate-rial Consumption (DMC) is not adequate. RMC (Raw Material Consumption) instead of DMC is now being considered as an alternative. This option represents however only a slight progress, as it would also reflect imported resources.

Being actively involved in RE discussions, IMA-Europe con-tinues to advocate that a weight-based indicator only fo-cuses on the decrease of the total resources use and it does not account for the right use of resources: “using less” is not necessarily “using better”. For IMA-Europe, indicators should cover the three pillars of sustainability, namely envi-ronmental footprint, economic and social aspects. For this reason, the functionality and performance of materials, as well as a holistic LCA approach should prevail.

EREP (European Resource Efficiency Platform)In the past months, the EREP – the high-level stakeholder group with a mandate to provide guidance to implementing the RE Roadmap – has been working on a set of short term policy recommendations.Based on recent estimates, the EREP Action for a Resource Efficient Europe (June 2013) points out that the EU could reduce the total material requirements of its economy by 17 to 24%. In order to achieve this reduction, as well as creating jobs and growth, improving RE, measuring progress and promoting new business models, the EREP proposes a number of actions. Among these, RE indicators, non-financial reporting and a shift in taxation towards resource use are identified as key to promote and move towards a Resource Efficient econ-omy. IMA-Europe has contributed to the BusinessEurope position paper as a response to the EREP recommendations to ensure that the views of the industrial minerals industry are included. The paper stresses the fact that industry sup-ports a relative – not absolute – decoupling of resource use

and its environmental impact from economic growth. In this sense, RE indicators should carefully be considered. The paper also expresses the industry’s concern about setting up a mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting and the pre-conditions that would need to be taken into ac-count, should a shift in taxation need to occur (see below).

Taxation of resourcesIn its RE Roadmap, the European Commission already rec-ommended MS to consider a shift in taxation away from labour. A shift towards environmental taxation – sometimes in form of taxation of resources – is increasingly being recommended as a way to boost employment and eco-nomic growth as well as a tool to help getting the prices of resources right.

IMA-Europe’s contribution has been instrumental in the preparation of a NEEIP (Non-Energy Extractive Industries Panel) position paper on resource taxation that presents the NEEI views towards this tendency. The paper points out that a shift in taxation would not necessarily contribute to the ultimate goals of increasing resource productivity and reducing the environmental impact of raw materials. In ad-dition, resource taxation could negatively affect the com-petitiveness of EU’s industry by increasing the overall tax burden of companies.

Since the finalisation of the NEEIP position paper, IMA-Europe has been in contact with a number of key stakeholders to com-municate the industrial minerals sector’s views and concerns.

enhanced eu Business transparency

The political pressure around EU business transparency is growing as the European Union is taking a series of various new initiatives to intensify the European companies’ obligations around financial, social and environmental reporting. In the tough economic context, transparency is seen as an instrument leading to improved performance, healthy eco-nomic growth and sustainable employment.

EU companies’ reporting on financial informationIn June 2013, the EU adopted the new Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU (which now repeals the two previously existing 4th and 7th Accounting Directives 78/660/EC and 83/349/EC) which strengthens the transparency requirements for the disclosure of financial information for all listed and non-listed large companies. The revised text of the Trans-parency Directive (2004/109/EC should be adopted by the end of the year. Under the concept of country-by-country

“For IMA-Europe, RE indicators should cover the three pillars of sustainability; meaning that the functionality and performance of materials, as well as a holistic LCA approach should prevail in defining them”

and project-by-project reporting, these revisions have introduced new provisions for large extractive companies dealing with oil, gas and minerals and loggers of primary forests to disclose full details of their payments to national governments for every project that they operate. Despite IMA-Europe’s efforts and those of all related sectors including BusinessEurope to publicly voice the burden for industry of such extended and detailed reporting legal obligations, it appeared almost impossible for any business representative to successfully react on this sensitive topic.

EU companies’ reporting on non-financial informationAs regards the disclosure of non-financial information, the European Commission has also recently decided to deviate from its usual approach of considering Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a voluntary tool. In April 2013, the European Commission took action to introduce a legislative proposal for new mandatory requirements in the just freshly modified Accounting Directives 78/660/EC and 83/349/EC obliging large companies with more than 500 employees to report on their social and environmental information in their annual report and large listed companies with more than 250 employees to include diversity policy information in their corporate governance statement. IMA-Europe is joining the overall EU industry position on this horizontal issue and supports BusinessEurope to defend a voluntary approach to CSR, which is the core aspect of its added value for companies.

Conflict mineralsThe European Commission is also closely considering the need for a new EU initiative to enhance due diligence and transparency on the sourcing of conflict minerals from con-flict-affected and high-risk areas. Looking at existing trace-ability systems such as the US Dodd-Frank Act section 1502 and other international, national or sectoral schemes, the Commission launched a public consultation in March 2013 to gather views on such a considered EU initiative.

In a letter to Karel de Gucht, European Commissioner for Trade, IMA-Europe expressed its concerns over the intro-ductory wording to the public consultation which threw a black shade on the mineral industry as a whole, without any distinction. As a follow-up, IMA-Europe met DG Trade in June 2013 to discuss our members’ concerns over the consultation and present the specificities of the industrial mineral sector.

Liaising with other EU trade associations, IMA-Europe also contributed to the public consultation in June 2013 to point out that industrial minerals are not concerned by the defi-nition of “conflict minerals” as our minerals are mainly ex-tracted and traded locally in Europe. The industrial mineral sector is further calling for a better definition of the scope of “conflict minerals” and “conflict and high risk areas”, in order to give some predictability and allow companies to understand their obligations. IMA-Europe will closely monitor the outcome of the public consultation and the next steps undertaken by the European Commission which might affect industrial mineral companies.

explosives for Civil use

The difficulties and challenges to implement the amending Directive 2012/4/EU amending Directive 2008/43/EC setting up a system for the identification and traceability of explo-sives for civil uses – from its production site and its first placing on the market until its final user – resulted in new deadlines for implementation. In this sense, and in order to ensure a proper implementation by all stakeholders, a Task Force on Explosives for civil uses was created.

As a member of this Task Force, IMA-Europe has contrib-uted to the preparation of an action plan endorsed by the European Commission and Member States to address the challenges identified. A guidance document to the whole supply chain is being finalised.



Page 12


Climate ChangeAn energy and climate framework for 2030

The debate on a new energy and climate framework for 2030 has started. This new framework builds on the ex-periences with the current 2020 package which aims at a 20% greenhouse gas reduction, an average EU-wide share of 20% renewables in the Union’s fuel mix, as well as a 20% increase in overall energy efficiency.

Its successor, the 2030 energy and climate package will be a milestone on the road to achieving the EU ambitions for 2050 which are described in the various Roadmaps pub-lished throughout 2012.

IMA-Europe has contributed to the discussion and submit-ted a response to the Commission’s stakeholder consulta-tion. IMA-Europe insists that the Union’s climate and energy policy towards 2030 is fully aligned with the EU’s objec-tive to foster industrial competitiveness. A growth strategy is therefore required to carefully balance the EU’s “green” ambitions with a genuine concern to keep industrial pro-duction in Europe. A credible GHG reduction target should take account of the economic and technical feasibility of further GHG reductions. Several sectors – including lime – have already pointed at the constraints for reducing GHG emissions. A key concern is, of course, maintaining a level playing field at international level.

update of the carbon leakage list and taxation of energy products

Every five years a “carbon leakage list” is prepared by the Commission in the framework of the EU ETS. Sectors on this list receive a number of carbon allowances for free in order to mitigate the impact of the cost of buying allowances on their competitiveness. Preparations for the revision of the carbon leakage list have already started. For the lime sector in particular it is crucial to remain on the carbon leakage list because of its carbon intensity and because lime production falls within the scope of the EU ETS. Nonetheless, the other

IMA-Europe sectors may also have an interest as the list may become the basis for granting carbon tax exemptions under the Directive on the Taxation of Energy Products.

Because Member States need unanimity to take decisions in the field of taxation, the negotiations on the revision of this Directive have been dragging on for several years. It is still unsure if and when agreement will be reached. The revised

Directive would introduce an additional tax for combusti-bles on the basis of their CO2 content. Activities that are on the “carbon leakage list”, determined according to the provisions in the EU ETS, may be granted a partial carbon tax exemption. Mineralogical sectors remain exempted from the energy taxation part in any case.

In order to determine the status of each sector, IMA-Europe has analysed the available and relevant sector information, mainly EUROSTAT data. We have identified for each IMA-Eu-rope sub-sector the risk to fall off the carbon leakage list. The new carbon leakage list should be ready by the end of 2014. IMA experts will have to decide if actions are needed.

Recalibration of the eu etS

The EU will likely achieve its GHG reduction target for 2020 despite the current low carbon price, mainly due to the eco-nomic recession. The Commission is concerned however that the current low carbon price insufficiently triggers in-vestments in low carbon technologies. Therefore the EU executive has made several proposals to increase the car-bon price, one of them being “backloading” (i.e. to post-pone the auctioning of part of the allowances from the first years of the 3rd Trading Period (2013-2020) towards the end, which should increase carbon prices in the short term). IMA-Europe gained the support from the Social Partners in the Social Dialogue Committee for the Extractive Industries (SSDCEI) for its actions against backloading.

In addition, the Commission announced some more struc-tural measures that could lead to a permanent withdrawal of allowances from the EU ETS.

All these developments are actively followed up by IMA and specifically by EuLA. Where needed action is taken in co-operation with other associations grouped in the Alli-ance of Energy Intensive Industries and under the umbrella of BusinessEurope.



InnovationThe European objectives of ‘Smart, Sustainable and Inclu-sive growth’ and the national growth programs can only be achieved through innovation and depend more than ever on European innovation partnerships (EIPs) and joint pub-lic-private partnerships (PPPs) that help direct innovation to-wards meeting societal needs along the value chain.

the european Innovation partnership on Raw Materials (eIp RM)

In 2012, in line with the Raw Materials policy initiated five years ago, and the challenges identified along its develop-ment2, the Commission proposed to develop a European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials (EIP RM)3. The EIPs are part of the Innovation Union Flagship4, a European innovation programme with the two-fold objective of im-proving conditions and access to finance for research and innovation in Europe and ensuring that innovative ideas are turned into products and services creating growth and jobs. Therefore, the EIP RM is structured along two axes, a technological pillar and a non-technological one. A third cross-cutting pillar addresses international cooperation. Ac-knowledging the importance of the project for the future of the European Raw Materials policy, IMA-Europe decided

to strongly support the project. Seven IMA representatives were nominated by the Commission in the EIP governance bodies, including a seat in the High Level Steering Group (HLSG) (Jean-Luc Deleersnyder, Sibelco CEO), the Sherpas Group (Michelle Wyart-Remy, IMA-Europe), and the Oper-ational Groups (OG) (Damien Grégoire, Carmeuse; Michalis Stefanakis, S&B Minerals; Pim Demecheleer and Sam Leese, Sibelco).

The Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) shaping the Roadmap of the EIP RM will be endorsed in September by the HLGS. The numerous actions proposed by the OGs were selected on the basis of criteria agreed by the Sherpas which take into account their economic benefit to EU industry, including security of supply and EU industry competitiveness; their level of innovation (technology-based actions) or implementation readiness (non-technology-based actions); and sustainability.

In parallel, the EU research funding programme under preparation, Horizon 2020, plans for the budgets for the technological projects to be financed. These would include Raw Materials R&D&I coordination in the EU, substitution for at least three applications of critical and scarce raw ma-terials and up to 10 pilot actions on exploration, mining, processing and recycling for innovative production of raw materials, both from primary and secondary sources.

The non-technological actions should define the framework regulatory conditions for primary raw materials, focusing on the exchange of best regulatory practices between Member States, as well as the framework conditions for enhanced ef-ficiency in materials’ use and waste prevention, the knowl-edge base of EU primary and secondary resources (statistical information) and skills optimisation. Aiming at a sustainable production of raw materials in the EU, these actions should now be further developed respecting the spirit of the EIP RM, i.e. demonstrating raw materials public importance and increasing public acceptance for their production in the EU, while assessing the cumulative effect of EU policies/leg-islation on the non-energy extractive industries (NEEI).

IMA-Europe experts played an active role in shaping the SIP agenda taking particular care of balancing the interests of the various stakeholders and all steps all along the val-ue-chain.

IMA-Europe joins the Advisory Board of the 2-year FP7 proj-ect COBALT, which intends running a series of interactive

2 COM(2011)25 Communication “Tackling the Challenges in Commodity Markets and on Raw Materials”3 COM(2012)82 Communication “Making Raw Materials available for Europe’s Future Well-being - Proposal for a European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials”4 COM(2010) 546 Communication “Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative - Innovation Union”

Page 14


events to mobilise the participation of civil society, research, industry as well as national authorities to support a favour-able framework for the development of the EIP on Raw Ma-terials. The project is coordinated by the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Research Institute for Manag-ing Sustainability, with as partners: Ecologic Institut gemein-nützige GmbH (Berlin), BIO Intelligence Service (Paris), the Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Envi-ronmental and Natural Resources Engineering, TECNOMA SA (Madrid), National Association for Consumers’ Protec-tion and Promotion of Programs and Strategies (Bucharest).

IMA-europe contributions to innovation initiatives

IMA-Europe supports, promotes and participates in innova-tion initiatives within the sector and along the entire value chain to ensure a cross sectoral response to the challenges of European industry. IMA-Europe has actively participat-ed in EU funded projects namely the cross sectoral SPIRE and the industrial minerals focused STOICISM project and promoted best case studies from the sector in international conferences and events, such as the European Minerals Day. PPPs are expected to contribute to generating sustainable growth and put Europe back on track in the race for global competitiveness.

The Sustainable Process Industry through Resource and energy efficiency (SPIRE) is one of the first inno-vation-driven public-private partnerships in Europe which represents the joint efforts of 8 industry sectors namely: ce-ment; ceramics, chemical, engineering, minerals, non-fer-rous metals, steel and water via 33 manufacturing com-panies; 30 research and technology organisations and 11 European associations. A.SPIRE was established at a signing ceremony in Brussels on 18 July 2012, and IMA-Europe is one of the founding members and holds a seat in the SPIRE Board. Beside IMA-Europe’s involvement, some IMA mem-bers are directly involved as companies. In July 2013, the Commission acknowledged SPIRE and the Roadmap jointly developed by SPIRE partners as one of the PPPs part of the Horizon 2020 research framework programme. A Broker-age Event is planned on 22 October 2013 in Brussels for setting up the partnerships and for launching the collabora-tive project proposals put forward by the SPIRE community. IMA-Europe has two seats at the event.

The Sustainable Technologies for Calcined Industrial Minerals (STOICISM) project consists in developing sus-tainable and innovative solutions for minerals processing

routes reducing the carbon footprint of several calcined industrial minerals, along the whole supply chain from the extraction, waste valorisation and optimisation of the functionality for the end users. More in particular, Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) technologies will be test-ed for the beneficiation, drying, and calcination of miner-als, notably diatomaceous earth (DE), perlite and clay and new technologies for energy production will be evaluated. The innovation achieved through STOICISM aim at being transferred to other industrial minerals. IMA-Europe is lead-ing the dissemination activities for this FP7 funded project which is led by IMERYS. The key deliverable from IMA-Eu-rope is the project website: http://www.stoicism.eu/.

In an age of high and volatile energy costs, realising the energy savings potential in businesses is an effective way to increase their competitiveness and to reconcile econom-ic growth and environmental protection via the SMEs. To-wards Energy Efficient Primary Mineral Extraction and Processing in Europe (ENERMIN) is a project submitted by the University of Leoben in collaboration with other con-sortium members (such as Universities, research and inno-vation institutes in EU) to the 2013 Call launched by Intelli-gent Energy Europe (IEE). Since the scope of the project is to increase energy efficiency and thus competitiveness within the European raw materials sector (industrial and construc-tion minerals) with special emphasis on SMEs, IMA-Europe has provided a letter of support and will contribute as ap-propriate along the project.

The International Conference on Sustainable Devel-opment in the Minerals Industry (SDIMI 2013) is a bi-annual event which contributes to defining strategies and sharing best practices on sustainability within the minerals sector and beyond. IMA-Europe contributed through a pre-sentation entitled: “Reducing the environmental footprint in the industrial minerals sector: Case studies & Innova-tion”, which consisted in illustrating through case studies how IMA-Europe member companies are addressing the challenges of resource efficiency, lower carbon economy, recycling/reuse from a life cycle and value chain perspective.

IMA-Europe is considered as a reliable partner in creating awareness and providing support in innovation projects and initiatives, which will shape the agenda and actions for Europe 2020 and beyond. The promotion of compa-ny case studies that illustrate where and how innovation is addressed and quantified, contributes to share the sec-tor achievements, build potential partnerships and engage with the right actors (industry, policy, researchers)



ENVIRONMENT

Page 16

Revision of the environmental Impact Assessment (eIA) Directive

european Fund for Industrial Accidents

Ambient Air policy and Industrial emissions

Biodiversity

IMA life Cycle Inventory (IMA lCI)

Review of Waste policy and legislation

IMA-Europe jointly with the NEEIP and BusinessEurope sup-ports the principle of smart regulation which aims at minimis-ing additional financial burden for the industry, shortening the timeline for completion of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and harmonising the EIA implementation across Europe to facilitate industry compliance.

Back in October 2012, the Commission released a proposal to revise the Directive on the Assessment of the effects of cer-tain public and private projects on the environment, the so-called EIA Directive (85/337/EEC). The scope of the proposal is aligned with the principles of Smart Regulation. The adoption procedure for this legislative proposal is the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly co-decision) which implies the submission of the Commission proposal to the European Parliament (EP) on the one hand, and to the Council on the other hand.

IMA-Europe advocates actively to both EU bodies as well as at member state level to address the concerns of our sector:• We support the ‘One-stop shop’ approach and the need

for a technically competent person performing the EIA,• We oppose the mandatory screening procedure for the

extractive sector; the retro-active effects of the new pro-visions on on-going EIAs; the mandatory use of accred-ited experts; and last but not least, the embedding of monitoring obligations within an EIA.

The robust position developed by IMA-Europe (and sup-ported by the NEEIP and Business Europe), the support of the Permanent Representations of Ireland and Lithuania (the latter leading the Council presidency from 1 July-31 December 2013) allowed a positive outcome at Council lev-el. The main points identified by IMA-Europe were taken on board, and the final Council Presidency compromise text is more balanced than the original Commission proposal (COM (2012) 628).

The effective exchanges between IMA-Europe and European Parliament (EP) Rapporteur Zanoni (ALDE political group) resulted in a balanced report compared to the EC proposal. However, the compromise amendments voted at the Environment Committee of 11 July, go far further than the


Revision of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive

“IMA-Europe supports the principle of smart regulation, minimising financial burden, shortening the EIA timeline and harmonising EIA implementation across Europe to facilitate industry compliance.”

IMA-Europe has committed itself to coordinate the efforts of the whole NEEIP to minimise the impact of the EIA revision on the extractive industry. A resounding ‘yes’ was given for far stricter environmental impact assessments before projects are authorised. The ENVI MEPs wish to enlarge the scope of the Directive to shale gas extraction, exploration and underground projects. They also propose to introduce stricter provisions concerning public information.

At the Council meeting, the Member States expressed their fear of too much red tape from the Parliament action. Although they agreed on the need to update the Directive, concern was expressed that the proposed measures were not congruent with the objective of simplification, and rather added complexity to the implementation at MS level as well as uncertainty for industry.

Page 18

IMA Europe Environment

Figure: The EIA revision process and lobbying actions by IMA-Europe and partners.

Reports Debates/Meetings Vote Position Papers IMA Lobbing

IMA-Europe members and the extractive industries in Eu-rope are operating under very complex and strict safety and environmental regulatory frameworks. The creation of a European fund sponsored by industry to cover industrial failures will likely be counter-productive for the Industry’s current best practices in terms of prevention and company investments in sustainable and safe operation practices. In this regard, IMA-Europe prepared a position paper together with the Non Energy Extractive Industry Panel (NEEIP) which calls for a careful assessment of existing legislation and ex-isting financial obligations which are already embedded in various EU legislations.

Over the last years, a few major accidents have occurred in Europe causing major damages to property and to the environment, such as the “red mud aluminium accident” of 4 October 2010 in Hungary. While this accident was not qualified eligible for the European Union Solidarity Fund which only covers major natural disasters, the Hungarian government realised the shortcomings of the European Li-ability Directive (ELD) and highlighted the need for an EU industry sponsored fund that could intervene for major in-dustrial accidents. The main features of the fund based on the Hungarian proposal are:

European Fund for Industrial Accidents

oct nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept oct nov Dec Jan

presidency ofthe Council Ireland Lithuania Greece

Comission

parliement

Council

Member States

position papers

ENV

IMA NEEIP NEEIPBE, NEEIP BE, NEEIP BE

ENV EP



The EU’s Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution is under re-view and a package with (new) measures is expected by Autumn 2013. The new air package will most likely contain a proposal for a revised National Emission Ceilings Directive (NEC), which imposes economy-wide reduction targets for a number of pollutants. The Commission is also considering the introduction of specific measures for limiting the emis-sions from small and medium-sized combustion installations (<50MW). Some of those installations have so far been ex-empted from the Industrial Emissions Directive. IMA-Europe is carefully monitoring the issue. A new IMA Europe “expert list” with representatives from amongst the IMA member-ship was created to ensure a swift reaction from the sector as soon as a proposal is released.

As IMA-Europe and EuLA had expected, the Commission wanted to adopt BAT (Best Available Techniques) Conclu-sions derived from the Cement, Lime and Magnesiumoxide (CLM) BREF although this BREF was negotiated under the

more flexible IPPC framework. The new concept of “BAT Conclusions” was introduced by the Industrial Emissions Directive – the successor to the IPPC Directive. When BAT Conclusions are adopted, the emission values associated with the identified best available techniques become more binding. The Member States keep only a limited possibility to grant exemptions. IMA-Europe and EuLA challenged the practice of deriving BAT Conclusions from a document ne-gotiated under different conditions (IPPC) and had a legal opinion prepared jointly with the other sectors concerned. This legal opinion laid a good basis for the negotiations on the BAT Conclusions as it clarified further the room for manoeuvre. The discussions came to a good end. The BAT Conclusions are now translated in the EU’s official languag-es and published in the Official Journal.

• It would be financed by a tax: proposed rate of 0.2% of the annual net sales revenues of industry operators;

• Its intervention potential amounts to €4-5 billion;• It would be called upon for accidents causing environ-

mental damages above €100 million, as companies should cover costs up to this threshold;

• Immediate access (pre-financing tool); • Management of entire fund in case of no accidents, or

the residual funds to possibly provide grants to opera-tors for implementing preventing failure measures.

The European Commission engaged Bio Intelligence Service (BioIS) to investigate the feasibility of creating such an EU fund and to assess whether similar funds exist worldwide. As a re-sult, BioIS issued a background assessment paper and ques-tionnaires for insurance companies and industry respectively.

IMA-Europe’s position, which is shared by various sectors (e.g. NEEIP, Oil) and various Member States, is that the ex-tractive and mining sectors are already under the obligation of a number of legislations which require mandatory finan-cial security (namely Mining Waste Directive, Environmental Impact Assessment, Seveso, European Liability Directive). Imposing another mandatory financial obligation on these overregulated sectors will be burdensome. Without the as-sessment of risks per sector, the fund would result in dispro-portionate costs. The existence of this EU fund will likely be counterproductive, since it will not prevent accidents from happening, therefore focus should be in risk prevention rather than on accident management. In addition to con-tributing to the NEEIP position, IMA-Europe with support of its members, responded to the industry open consultation, participated in various meetings where the issue was dis-cussed as part of the implementation of the European Liabil-ity Directive across Europe and shared its concerns with DG Enterprise representatives. As a result of the lobbying activi-ties, the European Commission put the initiative of creating such a fund on-hold for the time being.

Ambient Air Policy and Industrial Emissions

Ecosystems: Biodiversity / No Net Loss / Habitat Banking The No Net Loss (NNL) and Habitat Banking initiatives which are being developed within the EC are key to achieving the ob-jectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2020. IMA-Europe and its colleagues from the NEEIP (Non-Energy Extractive In-dustries Panel) coordinate their efforts to provide a coherent response to the concerns that these initiatives are raising within the extractive sector.

No Net Los (NNL)The NNL concept is defined as “the balance of conservation/biodiversity losses in one geographically or otherwise de-fined area by a gain elsewhere, provided that this principle does not entail any impairment of existing biodiversity as protected by EU nature legislation”. The Commission an-nounced an NNL initiative by 2015 to implement the prin-ciple throughout the EU. To this effect, a working group on “No Net Loss of Ecosystems and their Services” was set up to review and harmonise existing studies and practices within Member States. The NEEIP has secured a seat within the group, allowing to guarantee that orientations taken are consistent with existing initiatives and legislation, or on-going projects, such as, for example, Natura 2000.

Habitat Banking and biodiversity offsetsIn order to achieve “no net loss” of biodiversity within the EU, the European Commission is notably working on schemes and instruments to compensate and offset biodi-versity losses. Among these, “habitat banking” enables de-velopers to purchase credits from established compensation schemes (habitat banks) to offset their impacts.

A report entitled “Exploring potential demand for and supply of habitat banking in the EU and appropriate design ele-ments for a habitat banking scheme”, prepared by ICF GHK in February 2013 for the European Commission, suggests that although NNL is not clearly stated in existing EU ini-tiatives for biodiversity, requirements for compensatory measures are already in place. However, harmonised instru-ments to measure gains and losses are lacking. According to ICF GHK5, “each member state has implemented the EU requirements in different ways and with different ambition levels”. The report includes the key design elements of bio-diversity offsets and habitat banking schemes at EU level.

IMA-Europe position regarding the Biodiversity FundInitiatives such as No net Loss, habitat banking, offsets, bio carbon allowances, etc., are part of a set of fiscal / financial instruments developed to cover the cost to meet the biodi-versity targets set for 2020 within the EU. This is an emerging area, also experienced at Member State level to ensure an overall gain in biodiversity across Europe.

With rehabilitation process already being an integral part of the legal quarry development process, such initiatives could in fact be considered as an opportunity for the industrial minerals sector. However it may also lead to duplication of financial and management efforts especially in the concept of “outside-the-fence boundary” which implies that the rehabilitation process is likely to be extended outside the quarry fence.

IMA-Europe argues that the extractive sector is subject to multiple legislative requirements with regard to biodiver-sity and ecosystems restoration, which are to be planned as soon as the request for a permit to operate is issued. IMA-Europe would rather favour initiatives that facilitate the implementation and enforcement of such rules at sector level, rather than measures to create new funds for biodi-versity preservation for multiple sectors.

Page 20


Biodiversity

“IMA-Europe favours initiatives that facilitate the implementation and enforcement of rules at sector level, rather than measures to create new funds for biodiversity preservation for multiple sectors.”

5 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/taxation/pdf/Habitat_banking_Report.pdf



IMA-europe Life Cycle Inventory (IMA LCI) IMA-Europe supports the use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools in a holistic approach which allows calculating the environmental footprint of a product along the value chain. IMA-Europe’s position is to carefully use the (LCA) ap-proach for policy making initiatives in the field of resource efficiency, product sustainable consumption and eco-labeling, since aspects such as functionality, durability, economic and social impacts are not accounted for. Aligning our position and strategy with key industry players and providing coherent feedback in policy making and at fora is critical to ensure visibility, and reinforce the position of the association as a key player with policy makers and stakeholders. In the past year, IMA-Europe has raised the industrial minerals sector visibility vis-à-vis stakeholders and policy makers by participating in and contributing to different forums and policy initiatives.

ensure Visibility for the IMA lCI

IMA-Europe is one of the first Brussels based industry associations which developed European LCI data providing European average LCI data to the European Life Cycle Database (ELCD) platform which has about 440 LCI datasets. The IMA LCI covers eight industrial mineral products and is one of the 36 datasets published compliant with the entry-level requirements of the International Life Cycle Datasets (ILCD). Following the ELCD publication, two LCI information packages were pre-pared to facilitate internal IMA-Europe member company trainings and harmonise external communication for the sector data. The information packages consist in defining products within the scope of the IMA LCI, describe system boundaries, summarise the assumptions, and report the environmental footprint of the eight industrial minerals. This information can be accessed through the website (http://www.ima-europe.eu/eu-policy/environment/life-cycle-assessment). The commu-nication down the value-chain is closely monitored by the IMA-Europe secretariat. The graph below is an overview of the received requests to date.

Attending international meetings creates visibility for the work done so far and ensures that the LCA practitioners are aware of the industrial minerals sector data. The results from the IMA LCI were presented in two international events: • 18th LCA Symposium organised by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) in November 2012,

in Copenhagen. The SETAC event consists in presenting LCI/LCA case studies and methodology developments;• 6th International Conference on Sustainable Development in the Minerals Industry (SDIMI 2013), 30 June-2 July 2013,

in Milos. The conference is a platform which defines strategies and assists to develop and share best practices on sus-tainability within the industrial mineral sector and beyond.

In both events the IMA LCI results were of interest to various representatives from industry, research institutes, universities and database providers.

Figure: The EIA revision process and lobbying actions by IMA-Europe and partners.

lCA practitioners

Association

Consultancy

Manufacturing Company

Research

Requests by Market Concrete

Industrial Mineral

Multiple Markets

Plastic

Chemicals (Paint)

Steel

Waste

position IMA-europe in key fora on lCA Related Issues

Acknowledging IMA-Europe long collaboration in the ELCD/ILCD project, the Commission invited IMA-Europe to give a presentation at the Advisory Group of the European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment (EPLCA) which met on 1 July 2013 in Brussels. The EPLCA group defines the strategy for the development of Life Cycle Thinking and interacts with industry to ensure a coherent link to policy develop-ments. The strategic decision to attend the meeting was twofold: First, to introduce the work done by IMA-Europe on the development of four LCI studies covering 15 products and four LCA covering four applications and secondly, to highlight the drawbacks of using LCI/LCA data for policy making purposes without addressing the limitations of the methodology which was intended for decision making at product and company level. The IMA-Europe position received the support of the participants from the steel and plastic industries.

Defending the position that the LCA approach should be used, while taking account of its limitations, IMA-Europe actively contributed to the position paper which Business Europe (BE) sent to EU Environment Commissioner Janez

Potocnik. In view of the European Commission (EC) initia-tives on the Single Market for Green Products and the use of LCA results as default values, the BE position underlines that LCA is a useful and valuable instrument for industry to improve overall environmental performance but it is not suitable to be used for comparisons between complex prod-ucts since it might lead to market distortion and unfair com-petition due to misleading consumer information.

In addition to the Single Market for Green Products Com-munication (COM 2013/196/EU) the Commission devel-oped a harmonised methodology (COM 2013/179/EU) for the measurement of a Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) and an Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF). The latter methodology will be tested over a three-year period (2014-2017) through dedicated pilots carried-out by industry and supervised by the Commission. Should the proposed methodology be validated after this three-year trial, the PEF & OEF methodologies will become mandatory starting from 2018. The IMA Secretariat has already responded positively to be part of the technical secretariat for the pilot “Decora-tive Paints” led by CEPE and has alerted that it is interested to support with data for other relevant projects. The European Commission will communicate the selected winning pilots in September 2013.

Page 22




The revision of the waste targets will have a direct impact on IMA-Europe members. The IMA-Europe position is in line with the conclusions of the European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials which clearly states that the “Landfill ban for recyclable waste should only concern certain waste streams like paper, wood and other recyclable materials such as glass, metals, etc., and a ban on incineration should apply to unsorted waste and to waste that may be recycled under environmentally safe, technically and economically feasible conditions. In addition, in the landfill ban discussion it must be acknowledged that the backfilling (use of overbur-den for site restoration) should be separated from the waste landfilling. IMA-Europe supports the principle that the gradual introduction of the landfill and incineration ban should be accompanied by fostering innovation in sorting and recycling technologies of materials and residues not recyclable today and by the implementation of the waste hierarchy.

The revision of waste policies and respective legislations in 2014, consists in preparing legislations which are coherent, easily enforceable, up to date and in line with the Resource Efficiency Roadmap. The Commission has initiated a three step stakeholder consultation which covers three main areas:

1. Review of the European waste management targets, which implies the revision of three waste directives: • Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC): targets

for the preparation for re-use and recycling of waste materials from household & construction and demolition waste;

• Landfill Directive (99/31/EC): reduction targets for biodegradable waste versus landfill;

• Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (94/62/EC): differentiated recycling and recovery targets.

2. An assessment of how the problem of plastic waste can best be tackled in the context of the current waste policy framework.

3. An ex-post evaluation (“fitness check”) of five of the EU Directives dealing with separate waste streams: 1. Sewage sludge (86/278/EEC); 2. PCB/PCT (96/59/EC); 3. Packaging and packaging waste (94/62/EC); 4. End of life vehicles (2000/53/EC); 5. Batteries (91/157/EEC).

In view of responding to the consultation of the three waste di-rectives launched by the European Commission in June 2013, IMA-Europe shared its position with various sectors (glass, paper, metals, plastic, and construction) to ensure an industry coherent position, and submitted its position early September.

Review of Waste Policy and Legislation

“IMA-Europe supports the principle that the gradual introduction of the landfill and incineration ban should be accompanied by fostering innovation in sorting and recyclingtechnologies of materials and residues not recyclable todayand by the implementation of the waste hierarchy.”

PRODUcT SteWARDShIp

Page 24

Respirable Crystalline Silica

Accident Reduction

Chemical policy

Minerals in Agriculture


A major step was crossed in December 2012, when the European Commission’s Advisory Committee for Safety and Health (‘ACSH’) released its opinion on a possible inclusion of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) in the amendment of Directive 2004/37/EC on Carcinogens and Mutagens at the workplace.

There are three important aspects in this opinion:1. The agreed level for a European binding occupational

limit value for RCS is of 0.1 mg/m3, which is the one agreed on by industry.

2. The inclusion of RCS in the Carcinogens Directive or in the Chemical Agents Directive should address process generated RCS, which has different implications than if it were the substance which was included.

3. It is recognized that there are different legal possibili-ties to adopt such a binding OEL namely the Chemical Agents Directive (CAD) or the Carcinogens or Mutagens Directive (CMD).

From a meeting an IMA delegation had in April 2013 with the Unit in charge in the European Commission (Unit B3 – Health, Safety and Hygiene at Work - of DG Employment), it appeared that they intended to make an impact study on the revision of the Carcinogens Directive in which they would welcome contributions from industry on the RCS chapter. However, one may fear at this stage that there is little room in their work programme for analysing the impact of the other legislative option, i.e. the Chemical Agents Directive.

In August 2013, IMA-Europe and seventeen concerned in-dustry sectors sent comments to the Commission for their impact assessment and urged them to analyse the impact of the application of the strict hierarchy of obligations resulting from the Carcinogens Directive, and to provide an estimate of the benefits the inclusion and the CMD obligations would bring, which previous impact study (SHECan report) did not do. IMA-Europe also strongly requested the Commission to consider and compare the impact of the Chemical Agents Directive option in an identical way.

The impact study of the European Commission should be finalised end of 2013 and the Commission’s proposal for an amendment of Carcinogens Directive 2004/37/EC is expect-ed in the first quarter of 2014. For a possible revision of the Chemical Agents Directive, the timetable is unknown as the Commission has not made any legislative step so far.

During this crucial period, IMA-Europe will strongly pur-sue its efforts to demonstrate that the implementation of the Social Dialogue Agreement’s principles coupled with a Binding Limit Value in the Chemical Agents Directive in the whole European industry would provide an optimal pro-tection to workers’ health while not imposing to industry a series of unnecessary and unfair measures which would hamper the European economy.

Respirable Crystalline Silica

Workers health & safety is at the core of IMA-Europe’s con-cerns and activities since its creation in 1993. The association promotes risk prevention and been active in data collection on dust exposure levels for more than 10 years and, more re-cently, since 2011, on accidents at work statistics in the sector. The preliminary results of the first two years of safety statistics indicate that the accident performances of the industrial min-eral sector are not satisfying.

As there is a general consensus that that there is no higher priority for the minerals industry than the health and safety of the people it employs, the IMA Board recommended to launch an effective accidents prevention strategy starting in 2013.

An aspirational target of zero injuries for the sector was agreed and is to be reached in two phases:

1) a 50% reduction in the IMA LTIFR by 20162) a further 50% reduction by 2020

This Target Zero Injury strategy is designed around four pil-lars:

I. Obtain commitmentThe commitment from IMA-Europe companies’ top management will be obtained through the signature of official declarations which will be collected by the IMA Secretariat.

II. Reinforce data collectionThe collection of the 2012 accidents statistics was launched and we aim at 100% reporting.Information campaigns will be organised through the Sections and the companies;

The data analysis will be refined to possibly guide in-terventions;The types of accidents and the HSE management policies are investigated;The data will be analysed per geographic zone.

III. Exchange experiencesAnonymous company safety alerts (on serious and fatal accidents) will be shared with recommendations on how to prevent them. First, inside the IMA Occu-pational Hygiene (OSH) WG, and then a compilation will be shared with all IMA Members.A thematic Workshop is organised in Milos (7-8 Oc-tober 2013) open to all IMA Members. – Presentations of success stories based on different

types of HSE management. – Presentations of some serious accidents and how

to prevent them.

IV. Organise IMA Safety AwardsThe IMA Occupational Hygiene Working Group rec-ommends organising IMA Safety Awards in the fu-ture, which would reward companies showing the best improvement performances in safety.

Page 26

IMA Europe Product Stewardship

Accident Reduction

Nanotechnology is a new approach that refers to under-standing and mastering the properties of matter at the nano-scale. Nanotechnology offers innovative solutions to many current problems by means of smaller, lighter, faster and better performing materials, components and systems. This opens up new opportunities for wealth creation and employment provided that social aspects (such as public information and communication, health and environmen-tal issues, and risk assessment) are adequately addressed to ensure a responsible development of nanotechnology

and that it meets people’s expectations. In this context, the European legislator has the duty to provide an adequate legislative framework to boost innovation in nanotechnol-ogy while ensuring a safe handling of nanomaterials. The latter aspect was particularly followed by IMA-Europe with the objective to avoid additional restrictions for industrial minerals unless duly justified.

For industrial minerals, the real story began with the adop-tion of a recommended definition for nanomaterials in

Nanomaterials



Following the conclusions of its so-called “REACH Review” published in February 2013, the European Commission is now looking at implementing some of the adjustment mea-sures to the REACH regulation (EC) 1907/2006 that have been identified as necessary. Indeed, although the final Re-port assessed that, after more than five years, the REACH Regulation overall functions well and delivers on all assess-able objectives, it also recommends a number of actions. As a member of the Directors Contact Group (DCG), of the Competent Authorities for REACH and CLP (CARACAL) and of the network at REACH and CLP helpdesks (HelpNet), IMA-Europe is closely following the activities of the Europe-an Commission, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and national competent authorities that have now started reflecting on these recommendations. The required adjust-ments focus on amending the REACH annexes to clarify the obligations for nanomaterials substances and refining the ECHA Guidance documents to improve the quality of

the registration dossiers, put a stronger accent on the use of safety data sheets and strengthen enforcement. The in-dustrial mineral sector is particularly active in joining in the discussions about the potential modifications to the REACH annexes and contributed to the EU public consultation on nanomaterials and the potential changes to be included in the Annexes of the REACH Regulation in September 2013.

As a coordinator for six REACH Consortia for the registra-tion of eighteen substances, IMA-Europe continued provid-ing support and delivering Letters of Access to the co-reg-istrants to meet the second registration deadline of May 2013. The Secretariat also coordinated the various Consor-tia activities, whether these concerned the submission of the 2010-registered dossiers updates or the still ongoing testing proposals currently under evaluation by the European Agency. Further to the registration phase, the evaluation of the registered substances has now started and IMA-Eu-

Chemical Policy

October 2011 and since then, the regulatory activities on nanomaterials have grown exponentially. At EU level, dis-cussions take place notably in the Competent Authorities Sub-Group on nanomaterials (CASG-Nano), the ECHA Nano Working Group and the ECHA Group Assessing Al-ready Registered Nanomaterials (GAARN). Thanks to its rec-ognized expertise and commitment, IMA-Europe has been invited to participate in all these groups together with col-leagues from Cefic, Eurometaux and NIA (Nanotechnology Industry Association).

Although the volume of industrial minerals in IMA-Europe’s portfolio manufactured at the nano-scale would be consid-ered as marginal, the outcome of the discussions with the EU regulators could potentially affect industrial minerals not manufactured at the nano-scale. For instance, a strict imple-mentation of the nanomaterials definition could potentially embrace almost all the phylosilicates (e.g. kaolin, benton-ite, mica, …) which could be regarded as having particles in nano scale for 1 dimension (the individual layer of the crystalline structure). Also, industrial minerals supplied as fine powders could also fall under the definition for nano-materials due to the unavoidable presence of unintended nanoparticles in the particle size distribution (also referred to as the ”nano-tail” issue). Beside the issues around this European Commission recommended definition, there are ongoing discussions in the context of the EU chemicals leg-islation to adopt a methodology to use the (eco-)toxicity

data from bulk materials to its analogue materials delivered in the nanoform (i.e. the “read-across” approach). It is very likely that such a methodology will be extrapolated to other read-across justifications to use the (eco-)toxicity data be-tween different crystalline forms. The above examples jus-tify the resources IMA-Europe invests in these topics. The IMA Working Group on nanomaterials is dedicated to these issues and is supported by the IMA Metrology Working Group for analytical aspects.

All the above considerations have fed the political debate and, in October 2012, the European Commission endorsed a Communication on the second regulatory review on nanomaterials. In essence, the Commission considers that current legislation covers in principle the potential health, safety and environmental risks in relation to nanomaterials whilst often not explicitly addressing the risk of nanoma-terials. In line with these conclusions, the Commission will propose to adapt the existing ECHA Guidance documents and REACH Annexes to tackle adequately the nano aspects. The intensity of these revisions (clarification vs. additional regulatory provisions) will be subject to lively debates in the course of 2014, in particular, if we consider that the Eu-ropean Parliament holds the position that the Commission does not go far enough in regulating the safety of nanoma-terials and that the Member States are increasingly tempt-ed to adopt various national initiatives to keep track of the nanomaterials placed on their national market.

Page 28

IMA Europe Product Stewardship

Liming materials (e.g. calcium carbonate or lime) reduce soil acidity and, in doing so, can also provide the nutrients magnesium or calcium or both. In absence of EU legislation for liming materials, their manufacturers face a diversity of national rules leading to a distortion of the internal market. As a response to this identified issue, liming materials have been successfully included within the scope of the fertilizers regulation which now provides clear and EU-wide specifica-tions for these products. This new regulation –Regulation (EU) 463/2013 of 17 May 2013– will overrule national legis-lations and provide a level playing field for liming materials suppliers in the internal EU market. In accordance with the so-called “New Approach”, the regulation makes refer-ences to mandatory standards for the methods of analysis of liming materials that were developed by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN/TC 260). The legisla-tion will enter into force on 7 June 2014 to ensure that producers of liming materials are given time to adapt to the new EN Standards.

In coordination with other industry stakeholders, the ex-perts of the newly established IMA Agriculture Working Group have been instrumental all along the legislative pro-cess in providing relevant and robust inputs to the Com-mission and Member States. Company experts have also been actively involved in the development of the methods of sampling and analysis standards.

In parallel, IMA-Europe’s experts have actively participated in the preparatory activities aimed at revamping the EU fer-tilizers regulation. The revised regulation would notably ex-tend its scope to soil improvers and growing media where minerals are used. The Commission draft Proposal is expect-ed by the end of 2013.

Minerals in Agriculture

rope is closely monitoring the outcome of the evaluation by Member States of substances listed on the yearly reviewed Community Rolling Action Plan. This is all the more import-ant as some of these substances were picked up for assess-ment due to issues that are of interest for industrial minerals (e.g. substance characterisation, nanoparticles, toxicity of different forms of the substance).

The year 2013 was also a period for the IMA-Europe sec-tions members to make substantial communication efforts about the classification and labelling of the industrial min-erals they respectively represent. Indeed, since it was made public in 2012, the ECHA Classification and Labelling inven-tory has been displaying various and confusingly diverging hazard classifications for almost all industrial minerals, as a result of the self-classification notification exercise by indus-try under the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008. IMA-Europe

has actively helped its members by quickly launching sever-al discussions on the information available and appropriate classification for industrial minerals, by using the Classifi-cation & Labelling (C&L) Platform set up in February 2013 by the European Agency as an online discussion forum for registrants and notifiers of the same substance, when mul-tiple classifications have been notified for this substance. The Platform and its active use are expected to speed up the process of having an agreed classification and labelling for a substance.

Beyond EU borders, IMA-Europe also provided its members with an overview of the worldwide implementation of the Global Harmonisation System (GHS) in June 2013.



Within the framework of the stepped up EU Debate on Raw Materials, and the launch of the European Innovation Part-nership on Raw Materials (EIP RM) - the European Minerals day is more than ever a welcome and timely communication platform for raising awareness on the essential role of min-eral raw materials for a sustainable and competitive Europe. The European Commission has specifically chosen this sector led initiative as the principal communication channel on the EIP on RM, resulting as such in six sectors – among which newcomers - to partner up for the 2013 edition (cement, salt, mines, metals, research platforms, geological surveys, and with the support of the ceramics industries a.o.). The EMD is indeed truly unique: mobilising key stakeholders at all levels (EU, national and local) while informing the public on the role of mineral raw materials in the European economy, hopefully leading to more informed decisions and a greater public acceptance. Let’s look at the outcome.

On 24-26 May, 113 sites in 24 countries took part in the 4th edition of the European Minerals Day, organising more than 170 Open Days and school projects with the aim to enhancing public understanding and acceptance of mineral extraction and processing. More than 15,000 visitors came to explore the world of minerals around the key themes of resource efficiency, innovation, biodiversity and regional development. (Details on www.mineralsday.eu)

IMA-Europe again successfully led the coordination and or-ganisation of the European Minerals Day. The key theme evolved this year on raising awareness on how the mineral raw materials sector contributes to resource efficiency and innovation throughout the entire value chain.

One of the key objectives at EU level was to create an exhi-bition in the Parliament with the EMD partners, which could illustrate the mineral life cycle from exploration, extraction, processing, to downstream uses and recycling. This was achieved thanks to the active support of 5 Members of Eu-ropean Parliament (MEPs Rübig, Prof. Panayotov, Leinen, Helmer and Szymanski); and to some other parallel events on raw materials which were directly linked to the EMD or hosted especially for it, such as: • 6-8 May 2013: a very successful exhibition in the Euro-

pean Parliament in Brussels welcomed 150 stakeholders at the launch ceremony and reached an overall visibility of 2000 people thanks to its very central location.

• On 13 May, the EMD Partners welcomed EIP RM stake-holders at a high level EP dinner hosted by MEP Paul Rübig, and with the support from the European Commis-sion. The event allowed for a highly interesting debate among Commission officials, industry CEOs, members of the EIP RM HLSG, NGO and union representatives and the five MEPs - Paul Rübig, Jo Leinen, Vlado Panayotov, Sean Kelly and Vittorio Prodi.

cOMMUNIcATION

Page 30

European Minerals Day 2013 – A New Dimension

• The 15 May EP Business & Raw Materials Group chaired by Paul Rübig MEP was linked to the EMD 2013. Jean-Luc Deleersnyder (CEO Sibelco) represented the mineral raw materials sector, as well as at an EP Business & Raw Materials breakfast on 18 June.

• On 24 May, in the presence of European Commission Vice-President Antonio Tajani, the European Minerals Day 4th edition local events were officially launched, at the European Minerals Day Launch Event in Vipiteno, Italy, where the Vice-President visited the Omya mod-ern calcium carbonate mining operations and gave the Opening Speech.

In the run up to the events, the European Commission pro-vided two video messages, one by Vice-President Tajani on the EIP RM, and the other one by Environment Commission-

er Potocnik on Resource Efficiency. These are published on www.mineralsday.eu. In addition, IMA-Europe put several EMD branded tools and templates at the disposal of the participants, adding this year a Facebook page.

With its increased recognition and support by a growing number of stakeholders, the European Minerals Day ini-tiative has grown in importance and visibility. It helps the mineral raw materials sector at large to position itself as a key contributor to biodiversity, resource efficiency and in-novation; all elements being essential for meeting the EU Horizon 2020 agenda on sustainable growth. IMA-Europe hereby wishes to thank the members, partners and support-ers for their strong backing to the EMD since its launch in 2007. The continuity and created synergy are the real suc-cess factors of this pan-European awareness raising project!

In January, IMA-Europe launched its new website, which has become a more efficient tool to communicate on policy related issues with all our stakeholders, while providing an efficient and attractive chapter on IMA Membership and on the awareness on industrial minerals. (www.ima-europe.eu)

In June, IMA-Europe launched the STOICISM website in its capacity of exploitation and dissemination partner in this Imerys led FP7 innovative research project for Sustainable

Technologies for Calcined Industrial Minerals in Europe. (www.stoicism.eu)

Some Awareness campaign tools have been revamped and printed, such as the IMA Ads illustrating the role of industri-al minerals in daily life (see Image Library on IMA Website).


Other 2013 Communication Achievements

Page 32


IMA-euRope StRuCtuRe



Notes

Page 34


Notes

publisherIMA-Europe AISBL

Twin Gardens26, rue des Deux Eglises (6° floor)

B-1000 BrusselsBelgium

Phone +32 (0)2 210 44 10 Fax +32 (0)2 210 44 29

[email protected] www.ima-europe.eu

layout & productionSemantics Design

Science14 Atrium 14b, Rue de la Science 1040 Brussels

BelgiumPhone +32 2 808 36 27

Fax +32 2 808 36 [email protected]

photo CreditsIMA-Europe archive

AISBl Industrial Minerals Association europe aisbl, in short “IMA-europe”Established under the Belgian law under the enterprise / VAT number BE 0452.946.151

twin Gardens, 26, rue des Deux eglises (6° floor), B-1000 Brussels, BelgiumTel: 32 (0)2 210 44 10 Fax: 32 (0)2 210 44 29 E-mail: [email protected]

to find out more visitwww.ima-europe.eu

Documents

IMA-Europe 2013 Annual Report