8
IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Declination (deg)RA (deg)Neventsp-value (BIN)p-value (UNBIN)F90 (GeV m -2 s -1 ) BINF90 (GeV m -2 s -1 ) UNBIN e-31.78e e-21.27e e-31.88e e-22.53e e-31.97e e-21.54e e-21.92e e-21.54e e-21.46e e-21.26e e-23.11e e-23.07e e-23.12e e-23.12e e-22.33e e-23.27e e-23.36e e-22.01e e-23.49e e-23.60e e-23.71e e-22.38e e-22.50e e-24.95e-2

Citation preview

Page 1: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results

J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

Page 2: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

BIN: Source listInside the cone #

0 10

1 9

2 3

3 1

4 1

Happens in 1262 out of 100k experiments (~1.3%).

p-value (pre-trial) = 0.0015

HESS J1023-575 (-57.76, 155.83)

314 events

For a typical cone size of 4-5° we expect 0.6 bkg.

Page 3: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

Declination (deg) RA (deg) Nevents p-value (BIN) p-value (UNBIN) F90 (GeV m-2 s-1) BIN F90 (GeV m-2 s-1) UNBIN

- 63.83 195.7 0 1 1 7.04 e-3 1.78e-3

- 62.48 220.68 2 0.12 0.19 2.39 e-2 1.27e-2

-59.94 264.41 0 1 1 7.15 e-3 1.88e-3

-57.76 155.83 4 0.0015 0.0018 3.8 e-2 2.53e-2

-57.17 230.17 0 1 1 8.04 e-3 1.97e-3

-51.82 243.58 0 1 1 1.16 e-2 1.54e-2

-48.82 302.37 2 0.21 0.13 3.13 e-2 1.92e-2

-48.79 255.70 1 0.59 0.22 2.15 e-2 1.54e-2

-46.37 133 1 0.52 0.14 2.33 e-2 1.46e-2

-43.02 201.37 1 0.43 1 2.35 e-2 1.26e-2

-39.75 258.25 1 0.46 1 2.35 e-2 3.11e-3

-32.27 87.67 0 1 1 1.23 e-2 3.07e-3

-30.63 359.78 1 0.48 1 2.35 e-2 3.12e-3

-30.22 329.72 0 1 1 1.15 e-2 3.12e-3

-29.01 266.42 1 0.49 0.14 2.41 e-2 2.33e-2

-23.49 165.91 0 1 1 1.16 e-2 3.27e-3

-23.34 270.43 1 0.51 0.14 2.38 e-2 3.36e-2

-14.83 276.56 1 0.54 1 2.41 e-2 2.01e-2

-11.99 57.35 0 1 1 1.18 e-2 3.49e-3

-6.95 279.41 0 1 1 1.27 e-2 3.60e-3

-5.79 194.05 0 1 1 1.28 e-2 3.71e-3

1.79 28.17 2 0.11 1 4.62 e-2 2.38e-2

4.98 287.96 1 0.48 0.2 3.46 e-2 2.50e-2

5.81 98.24 3 0.026 0.005 6.33 e-2 4.95e-2

Page 4: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

UNBIN: Source list

Most significant cluster correspond to 4 events cluster near to the candidate source

The post-trial probability is ~ 4%

Declination (deg) RA (deg) p-value (UNBIN)

-57.76 155.83 0.0018

Second significant cluster correspond to only a 2 events,

being one very closer to a selected source at dec = -57.76

Cluster size fitted (1.5, 0.9)

degrees

P-value = 1 means any events has been found

near the source

Page 5: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

BIN: All sky

314 events

p-value = 0.0019

x trial factor

(-57.66, 157.82)

Happens in 14k out of 100k experiments (~14%).

0.00670.038

0.027

Page 6: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

Old IFIC analysis (94 events)

The most significant source remains the same

Page 7: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

1. Skymap for ANTARES 5Line data

2. Upper Limits for ANTARE 5Line: comparison between BINNED and UNBINNED (for more technical conferences)

3. Upper Limits for ANTARES 5Line: comparison with other experimental results.

2 3

1

Page 8: IFIC PLS 5L unblinding results J.P. Gomez, S. Mangano, P. Salesa

UNBIN: All sky

Most significant cluster (higger BIC value): dec = -19.73, ra = 266.07

Two events very close each other

Candidate list source:

Fitted position dec = -57, ra 158