Upload
yagil
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
- PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The March of Dimes Prematurity Campaign &
New Approaches to the Prevention of Preterm Birth
WebcastThursday, November 20, 2008
3:00 – 4:30 pm (Eastern)
Sponsored by Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health
Bureau & CDC National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Prevention
• Continuing Medical Education (CME)This activity was planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the CDC, NACCHO, and CityMatCH. CDC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The CDC designates this activity for a maximum of 1.5Category 1 credits toward the AMA Physician's Recognition Award.
• Continuing Nursing Education (CNE)This activity for 1.5contact hours is provided by the CDC, which is accredited as a provider of continuing education in nursing by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditations.
• Continuing Education Contact Hours (CECH)The CDC is a designated provider of continuing education contact hours in health education by the National Commission for Health Education Credentialing, Inc. This program is a designated event to receive 1.5Category 1 contact hours in health education. The CDC provider number is GA0082.
• Continuing Education Units (CEU)The CDC was reviewed and approved as an Authorized Provider by the International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET). The CDC will award .15CEUs to participants who successfully complete this program.
• If you are interested in receiving continuing education units:• - Go to the CDC Training and Continuing Education Online at http://www.cdc.gov/tceonline. If
you have not registered as a participant, click on New Participant to create a user ID and password; otherwise click on Participant Login and login. You will need to enter the following verification code: NACCITYIPV1
• - Once logged on to the CDC Training and Continuing Education Online website, you will be on the Participant Services page. Click on Search and Register. Use one of the 3 search options. Search for Course Number (EV1237) Click on View.
• - Scroll down and click on the program title. Select the type of CE credit you would like to receive and then click on Submit. Three demographic questions will come up. Complete the questions and then Submit. A message will come up thanking you for registering for the course.
• - If you have already completed the course you may choose to go right to the evaluation/posttest. Complete the evaluation/posttest and Submit. A record of your course completion and your CE certificate will be located in the Transcript and Certificate section of your record.
• If you have any questions or problems please contact:• CDC Training and Continuing Education Online • 800-41TRAIN or 404-639-1292• Email at [email protected]
New Approaches to the Prevention of Preterm Birth
Learning Objectives:
Participants will learn about the medical perspectives of preterm birth, the complexity of the problem and a summary of Prematurity Awareness activities.
Participants will come away knowing what the March of Dimes is continuing to do to address the growing crisis of preterm birth.
Participants will learn about new approaches to the prevention of preterm birth; as well as how March of Dimes chapters and these MCH experts are addressing the growing crisis in their states in and with “real” communities.
Participants will learn about new educational tools and resources for addressing preterm birth interventions.
Disclaimer
CDC, our planners, and our presenters wish to disclose they have no financial interest or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services, or commercial supporters. Presentations will not include any discussion of the unlabeled use of a product or a product under investigational use.
The March of The March of Dimes Dimes Prematurity Prematurity Campaign and Campaign and Prematurity Prematurity Awareness Awareness ActivitiesActivities
Karla Damus, PhD MSPH RN FAANAssociate Professor
Dept of Ob/Gyn and Women’s Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx,
NYNational March of Dimes, White Plains, NY
[email protected] 914 997 4463
9.611.0
12.3
7.6
12.8
0
5
10
15
1983 1993 2003 2006
Preterm is less than 37 completed weeks gestation.Source: National Center for Health Statistics, final natality dataPrepared by March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center, 2008
Pe
rce
nt
HP 2010 Objective>30% Increase
Preterm Birth RatesUnited States, 1983, 1993, 2003, 2006
> 1 out of 8 births or ~540,000 babies were born preterm in 2006
3
Leading Causes of Neonatal MortalityUnited States, 2004
28.5
41.4
97.8
116.2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Placenta, Cord,Membrane Problems
Maternal PregComplications
Birth Defects
Preterm / LBW
Rate per 100,000 live births
NCHS, Deaths: Leading Causes for 2003. National Vital Statistics Reports 55(10), March 2007.
Institute of Medicine Report, 2007
The IOM estimates the total national cost of premature births to be at a minimum $26.2 billion. This estimate includes many costs, such as in-patient hospital costs, lost wages and productivity and early intervention programs.
Preterm Birth Rates by Race and Education, IOM 2006
Years of Ed
NonHisp Black
NonHisp White
Asian Pacif Isl
Amer Indian
Hispanic
< 8 19.6 11.0 11.5 14.8 10.7
8-12 16.8 9.9 10.5 11.8 10.4
13-15 14.5 8.3 9.1 9.9 9.3
>16 12.8 7.0 7.5 9.4 8.4
Prematurity Campaign Background
Initiated in January 2003
Two goals:1. Increase public awareness of the problems
of prematurity to at least 60% for women of child bearing age, and 50% for the general public by 2010
2. Decrease the rate of preterm birth by at least 15% by 2010.
Prematurity Campaign:Prematurity Awareness
47%44%44%
41%42%41%
35%
54%
64%
51%50%
55%53%
41%
20%
40%
60%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Total Women 18-44
Campaign Goal I:Raise awareness of the problems of prematurity
Percent saying premature birth is a very or extremely serious problem
56%
34%
543,000
520,000
508,356
499,008
480,812
476,250467,201
450,000
500,000
550,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
*2006 preliminary birth data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics; Source: National Center for Health Statistics
Prematurity Campaign: Prematurity Rates
U.S. Babies Born Preterm, 2000-2006
Prematurity Campaign II
The March of Dimes Board of Trustees met in March 2008 and agreed to the extension of the Prematurity Campaign. They unanimously agreed the March of Dimes should:
1. Declare “Prematurity Prevention” a global campaign, and extend to 2020. Retain the goals of 15% reduction in rate and increased awareness for the U.S. Set global targets by 2010
Prematurity Campaign II Worldwide Problem of Preterm Birth136 million births worldwide*
An estimated 6-12% of births are preterm
27% of infant deaths are due to prematurity
Disproportionate burden of mortality on developing countries* WHO World Health Report, 2005Note: Prematurity estimates are based on developed countries
Prematurity Campaign II
2. Assume a more outspoken public stance on issues directly related to prematurity prevention– Create a more powerful Prematurity Awareness
Month in November. A national Prematurity Report Card will be developed in 2008 to put a spotlight on the incidence of prematurity
– Target big drivers of preterm birth such as rising rates of C-sections and certain ART practices
– Use Surgeon General’s Conference , June 2008, as a platform for launch of Prematurity Campaign 2020
Prematurity Campaign II
3. Focus on three critical investment opportunities and intervention targets with a three year horizon
Prematurity Campaign IIFocus on Critical InvestmentsAccelerate research:
– Expand Prematurity Research Initiative (PRI) to determine underlying causes of preterm birth (currently $3.5M per annum)
– Assist the WHO consortium to identify financial support to analyze worldwide genetic associations to preterm birth
– Identify additional private funding partners
Prematurity Campaign IIFocus on Critical InvestmentsExpand direct service to NICU affected
families: – These families will help to build a
constituency for the campaign– Increase the number of NICU Family Support
Programs to at least 100 sites by 2010, and develop new models for extending this program
Prematurity Campaign IIFocus on Critical InvestmentsImplement Community Programs based on the findings Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait Project
– Identify best practices that will help to define effective strategies for community-based regional interventions to decrease premature birth
– MOD chapters will be encouraged to develop local, regional, or statewide programs to decrease prematurity through partnering with professional groups, consumer organizations, and public health professional departments
National March of Dimes Preterm Birth InitiativesPreconceptional Summits- June 2005 and Oct 2007(
www.marchofdimes.com)– Expert Panel Recommendations, MMWR Apr 2006 – Work Groups (Clinical Care, Consumer, Public Health, Policy and Finance)– NICHD Preconception Research Meeting, April 14-15, 2008
Late Preterm Conference- July 2005– Seminars in Perinatology Supplements (Vol 1 and 2, 2006)– Clinics in Perinatology (Dec 2006)
Institute of Medicine (IOM)– Environmental Toxicants and PTB, 2001 – Preterm Birth Causes, Consequences, and Prevention, 2007
PREEMIE Law - Surgeon General’s Conference June 16-17, 2008
PREBIC (Preterm Birth International Collaborative)KY Prematurity Prevention Partnership to reduce singleton PTB
(HBWW)MOD national grand rounds program Family Medicine CQI PTB/LBW InitiativePAD- Prematurity Awareness Day- Prematurity SummitsNational and State PTB Report Cards, Preemie Petition
www.surgeongeneral.gov
www.marchofdimes.com/petition
103,374
Petition – Advocacy Elements
• A bipartisan effort to elevate the problem of preterm birth onto the health care agenda of our new President and Congress
• Inform legislators and regulators about the serious issue of preterm birth in order to drive policy changes at federal and state levels
We Need Your Support!
Please visit marchofdimes.com
and sign the Petition for Preemies
National Report Card Release
NATION GETS A “D” MARCH OF DIMES RELEASES
PREMATURITY REPORT CARD 18 States, Puerto Rico and DC Failed
Nov 12, 2008, WHITE PLAINS, NY – The United States hasn’t quite failed preterm infants, but it came close, according to the March of Dimes.
In the first of what will be an annual report card on preterm birth, the nation received a “D” and not a single state earned an “A,” when March of Dimes investigators compared actual preterm birth rates to the national Healthy People 2010 goal.
US PTB 12.7%
www.marchofdimes.com/peristats
Preterm Birth Rates, US, 2005
HP2010 Objective PTB 7.6%2005 US PTB 12.7%www.marchofdimes.com/peristats
Preterm Birth Rates Compared toHP2010 Objective and 2005 US Rate
Premature Birth Report CardGrades - MethodologyBased on distance from Healthy People 2010 goal –
measured in standard deviations.
A Less than or equal to 7.6% B Between 7.6% and 1 standard deviation above C Greater than 1, but less than 2 standard
deviations above 7.6% D Greater than 2, but less than 3 standard
deviations above 7.6% F 3 or more standard deviations above 7.6%
Goals of the Report Card
To create an awareness of the increase in incidence of preterm births as a nation and as individual states
To addresses issues related to prematurity including :
- Access to quality healthcare– Research into the causes and factor related to
prematurity – Prevention of preterm births in pregnant women,
through knowledge and intervention– Advocate for work policies that accommodate
pregnancy
Report Card – Advocacy Elements
• Access to health coverage for women of childbearing age– Maximize Medicaid & SCHIP eligibility– Medicaid targeted case management (TCM)– Family planning waiver
• Tobacco related initiatives– Medicaid coverage for smoking cessation – Funding for 5”As” provider education– Smoke-free initiatives– Tobacco tax– Health warning signs
• Report cards will be issued annually for at least the next 3 years
• Future report cards will highlight improvement or decline in rates from the previous year
• Work has begun on a global report on preterm birth rates – goal is to release on Oct. 4, 2009 in New Delhi
• Exploratory conversations have been held with U.K. organizations about a global Prematurity Awareness Day
Report Cards 2009 & Beyond
Late preterm: US, 2005 US 9.1%
3 Major Factors Affecting Preterm Birth Rates:
Late Preterm Births, Smoking, and Uninsured Women of Childbearing Age,
Smoking among women of childbearing age, US, 2007US 21.2%
Uninsured women: US, 2005-2007 AvgUS 20.1%
Preterm Births by Gestational Age Category United States, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005
3.3 3.4 3.6
7.3 7.7 8.29.1
3.3
0
5
10
15
1990 1995 2000 2005
less than 34 weeks Late Preterm (34 0/7-36 6/7 weeks)
71% Late
Preterm
Perc
en
t
10.611.6
12.711.0
Source: NCHS, Prepared by Perinatal Data Center, March of Dimes
Preterm Births by Week of GestationUnited States, 2004
8%
5%
16%
13%
21%
37% <32 weeks
32 weeks
33 weeks
34 weeks
35 weeks
36 weeks
Source: National Center for Health Statistics, 2004 final natality dataPrepared by March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center, 2007
Late preterm71%
6
Gestational Age-Specific DistributionSingleton Live Births, US, 1992, 1997, 2002
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Gestational Age (weeks)
Per
cen
t
1992 1997 2002
Peak Shifted: 40 to 39 weeks
Davidoff MJ, Dias, T, Damus K, Russell R, Bettegowda VR, Dolan S, Schwarz RH, Green NS and Petrini J. Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: Impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Seminars in Perinatology 2006;30:8-15.
Rates of Late Preterm Births (34-36 wks)for All States, 2005
Source: March of Dimes Peristats
Source: www.marchofdimes.com/peristats
2005 US Late Preterm Birth Rate 9.1%Which state had the largest increase in rates of late preterm birth in the past decade (1995-2005)?
Late Preterm Births Singleton Late Preterm
State 1995 2005%
Change State 1995 2005%
Change
MA 5.8 8.0 37.9 WV 7.0 9.7 38.6
WV 7.8 10.7 37.2 MA 5.0 6.7 34.0
KY 8.2 11.0 34.1 KY 7.5 9.9 32.0
AK 6.1 8.1 32.8 SD 6.1 7.9 29.5
MS 10.2 13.2 29.4 SC 7.7 9.9 28.6
5 States with Greatest Increase in Total and Singleton Late Preterm Births, 1995-2005
Why are Late Preterm Rates Rising? Changing culture of childbearing• More high risk pregnancies
– advanced maternal age, advanced paternal age– more complications such as infections, high blood pressure,
gestational diabetes, obesity– more multiple births– women unable to get pregnant before now conceive – more women now pregnant with serious health problems
advised not to get pregnant in the past – high risk behaviors including substance abuse (smoking,
drinking, illicit drug use)
• Public preferences/autonomy – date of delivery scheduled for convenience – cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR)
Why are Late Preterm Rates Rising? Changing culture of obstetrical practice
• Clinical management (more interventions) – more provider suggested scheduled deliveries– escalating rates of labor inductions– escalating rates of cesarean deliveries– if cesarean rates increase, rates of late preterm
birth usually increase
• Litigious environment, defensive medicine– 9 out of 10 obstetricians named in at least one law
suit– on average 2.6 suits/career
• 2006 ACOG liability survey– earlier delivery to prevent adverse outcomes such
as fetal demise
11
Why are Late Preterm Rates Rising? Changing culture of obstetrical practice
• Few evidence-based interventions after 34 weeks– window to administer antenatal steroids to women in
preterm labor is 24-34 weeks– increase in neonatal survival to almost 100% at 34 weeks
• Health care delivery system issues – reimbursement based on provider performing the delivery,
not necessarily the provider of the prenatal care– inadequate coverage of anesthesia or other staff during
some days of the week– administrative or defensive medicine driven decisions
to not offer procedures such as vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC)
12
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Total Primary VBAC
Source: NCHS, final natality data, 1993-2003 and 2004 preliminary dataPrepared by March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center, 2006
Total and Primary Cesarean and VBAC United States, 1993 - 2005
Per
cent
Cesarean Delivery Rates by Maternal Age Categories, US, 1990-2005
Source: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System
Rates of Total Cesareans for All States, 2005
Source: March of Dimes Peristats
Source: www.marchofdimes.com/peristats
2005 US Total Cesarean Rate 30.3%
60,000 additional singleton preterm births
Preterm Birth Rates by Delivery MethodUS, 1996 and 2004
Vaginal Cesarean section
1996 2004
Absolute
difference 1996 2004
Absolute
difference
Preterm
263,520 268,172 4,652 91,477 145,882 54,405
Total births 2,944,204 2,802,472 -141,732 722,756 1,071,082 348,326
Preterm
birth rate
9.0% 9.6% 0.6% 12.7% 13.6% 0.9%
Bettegowda VR, Dias T, Davidoff MJ, Damus K, Callaghan WM, Petrini JR. The relationship between cesarean delivery and gestational age among US singleton births. Clinics in Perinatology. 2008;35: 309–323.
Infant Mortality among Late Preterm and Term Singletons, United States, 1995 - 2002
7.68.17.8
8.38.78.9
9.5
7.9
3.02.42.52.62.62.72.82.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Late-Preterm Infants Term Infants
Rate per 1,000 live births
Late preterm is between 34 and 36 weeks gestation Source: National Center for Health Statistics, period linked birth/infant death data
Prepared by March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center, 200718
ACOG Committee Opinion # 404Late Preterm Infants April 2008
•Late preterm infants often are mistakenly believed to be as physiologically and metabolically mature as term infants. •Compared with term infants, late–preterm infants are at higher risk than term infants of developing medical complications, higher rates of infant mortality, higher rates of morbidity, and higher rates of hospital readmission in the first months of life. •Preterm delivery should occur only when an accepted maternal or fetal indication for delivery exists. •Collaborative counseling by both obstetric and neonatal clinicians about the outcomes of late–preterm births is warranted unless precluded by emergent conditions.
Statement developed jointly with AAP Committee on Fetus & Newborn
Clark SL, et al. AJOG, 2008;199:105.e1-105.e7.
•For the first time in many years, the primary cesarean delivery rate in our system in 2006 fell significantly (Fig 5, P .001), despite the tolerance of a liberal general approach to operative delivery •Appears to be attributable to fewer cesareans for oxytocin-induced fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with the universal implementation in 2006 of a uniform, checklist-based system for oxytocin administration.•In our large system, this translates annually into the avoidance of tens of thousands of primary and future repeat cesarean deliveries.
Clark SL, et al. AJOG, 2008;199:105.e1-105.e7.
PATHWAYS
FA
CT
OR
S
External Environment
Immune Status
Nutrition
Behaviors
Medical Conditions
Medical Interventions
Psychosocial
Oth
ers: Ho
rmo
nes?
Toxin
s?
Bleed
ing
/ Th
rom
bo
ph
ilias
Ab
no
rmal U
terine D
istentio
n
Matern
al / Fetal S
tress
Inflam
matio
n / In
fection
PRETERM BIRTH
OUTCOMES
Preterm Labor / pPROM
Racial / Ethnic Disparities
Genetics / Family History
Fetal Growth
Green NS, Damus K, Simpson JL, et al. AJOG 193:626-35, 2005.
Life Course Perspective
Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003;7:13-30.
Poor NutritionStressAbuseTobacco, Alcohol, DrugsPovertyLack of Access to Health CareExposure to Toxins
Special Supplement on the Clinical Content of Preconception Clinical Content of Preconception
CareCareGuest Editors: Brian Jack and Hani Atrash
1. Editorial - M Curtis2. Where is the “W”oman in MCH? - H Atrash, B Jack, MK Moos, D Coonrod, P Stubblefield, R Cefalo, K Johnson, K Damus, et al3. Clinical content of preconception care: an overview - Brian Jack, Hani Atrash, D Coonrod, MK
Moos, P Stubblefield, R Cefalo, K Johnson et al 4.4. Preconception Health Promotion - MK Moos, A Dunlop, B Jack, L Nelson, D Coonrod, R Long, K
Boggess, P Gardner et al 5. Immunizations - D Coonrod, B Jack, J Iams, P Stubblefield, J Conroy, M Lu, L Hillier, A Dunlop et al 6. Infectious Disease - D Coonrod, B Jack, J Iams, P Stubblefield, J Conroy, M Lu, L Hillier, A Dunlop
et al 7. Medical Conditions - A Dunlop, B Jack, P Bernstein, C Ruhl. M Lu, R Cefalo, S Shellhass, M
Beckman, L. Nelson, M McDiarmid, B Solomon, J Bottalico, J Iams, et al8. Parental Exposures - L Floyd, B Jack, Jean Mahoney, R Cefalo, YF Johnson, et al9. Family and Genetic History - Authors: G Ferro, B Soloman, et al10. Nutritional Status - Authors: P Gardner, L Nelson, C Shellhass, A Dunlop, C Hogue, et al11. Environmental Exposures - Authors: M McDiarmid, P Gardner, B Jack, et al 12. Psychosocial Risks - L Klerman, L Floyd, B Jack, D Coonrod, M Lu, et al13. Medications - A Dunlop, P Gardner, C Shelhaas, M Mcdiarmid, et al14. Reproductive History - P Stubblefield, U Reddy, W. Nicholson, D Coonrod, R Sayegh et al15. Special Populations - C Ruhl et al16. Fathers - K Frey, M Lu, et al17. Psychiatric conditions - Frieder, Dunlop, Bernstein, Culpepper
Prevent the Preventable
Ø Unintended pregnanciesØ Short interpregnancy intervalsØ Folic acid deficiencyØ AlcoholØ Tobacco Ø Illicit drugsØ Infections (UTIs, STIs, periodontal disease)Ø Extremes of weightØ Some medications (Rx, OTC, home remedies)Ø Environmental toxinsØ Known genetic/familial risksØ Unnecessary interventions resulting in preterm birthPromote appropriate level designation
and regionalization
do no harmat least--
It is post time/term to redefine prenatal care based on a life course perspective and until
then
…born in a nation and state that makes the grade and gets an
“A” for preventing preterm birth
support stronger, healthier babies