25
IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 General Meeting Distribution Reliability Working Group Atlanta, Georgia

IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data

2019 General Meeting

Distribution Reliability Working Group

Atlanta, Georgia

Page 2: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

2

Background to IEEE DRWG Benchmark Study

1. Initiated in 2003, conducted annually

2. Participants are anonymous with key identifier to retain anonymity

3. Participation list is not revealed to anyone

4. Each participant can choose to share their results

5. No inference is made about good or bad reliability

6. Intended to provide information for users to assess their performance relative to peers

7. Called the 2019 Study (for 2018 Results)2

Page 3: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

3

Benchmarking• Using annual key metrics (SAIDI, SAIFI and CAIDI) to assess

performance of a system may be useful, however, needs to be tempered

• DRWG Study attempts to identify various aspects that could cause a difference in reported metrics

• Data may not be directly comparable, since – Data collection & system differences exist

– Certain exclusion differences can occur, although we strive to have the differences minimized

• IEEE 1366-2003/2012 • addresses data issues by clearly defining the rules (i.e. what data should be

excluded)

• It DOES NOT address the data collection issues

• Companies may not report all forms of outages, due to data collection issues or other reasons

3

Page 4: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

4

Region 0: Spans States or Unknown

Region 1: Northeast

Region 2: Mid-Atlantic

Region 3: Southeast

Region 4: Midwest

Region 5: Southwest

Region 6: South

Region 7: Northwest

Northwest: 10

Participants

Southwest: 12

Participants

Midwest: 19

Participants

South: 9

Participants Southeast : 5

Participants

Northeast: 6

Participants

Mid-Atlantic:

26 Participants

Regions represented by the participants

2019 Benchmark Study

Spans States or Other: 3

4

Page 5: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

5

Classification of Respondents

• 85,258,061 customers represented in North America

• 2019 Survey– 7 Small (=< 100,000 customers)

– 56 Medium (>100,000 and <1,000,000 customers)

– 32 Large (>= 1M customers)

5

Page 6: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

6

Respondents•About 250 companies have responded at some time

•2019 Survey: 90 entries responded

All Participants 90 SAIDI ALL SAIDI IEEE SAIDI WOF SAIDI WOP SAIFI ALL SAIFI IEEE SAIFI WOF SAIFI WOP CAIDI ALL CAIDI IEEE

0 MIN 31 28 28 28 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 62 62

1 Q1 127 85 83 75 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 117 95

2 MEDIAN 209 123 110 102 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 162 109

3 Q3 399 168 150 145 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.0 251 133

4 MAX 3444 535 500 463 3.4 2.5 2.5 1.8 1177 247

Page 7: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

7

Respondents by Utility Size

Quartile Small 7 SAIDI ALL SAIDI IEEE SAIDI WOF SAIDI WOP SAIFI ALL SAIFI IEEE SAIFI WOF SAIFI WOP CAIDI ALL CAIDI IEEE

0 MIN 52 29 30 29 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.4 68 66

1 Q1 75 62 59 54 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 82 72

2 MEDIAN 113 98 70 58 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.8 94 85

3 Q3 331 167 135 100 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.8 135 110

4 MAX 367 190 157 148 3.0 2.4 1.2 1.1 220 134

Quartile Medium 56 SAIDI ALL SAIDI IEEE SAIDI WOF SAIDI WOP SAIFI ALL SAIFI IEEE SAIFI WOF SAIFI WOP CAIDI ALL CAIDI IEEE

0 MIN 31 28 28 28 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 62 62

1 Q1 125 88 84 78 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 115 95

2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109

3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134

4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3 2.2 1.8 1177 207

Quartile Large 32 SAIDI ALL SAIDI IEEE SAIDI WOF SAIDI WOP SAIFI ALL SAIFI IEEE SAIFI WOF SAIFI WOP CAIDI ALL CAIDI IEEE

0 MIN 49 49 49 48 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 102 69

1 Q1 170 86 84 76 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 144 100

2 MEDIAN 282 112 106 96 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.8 181 114

3 Q3 501 170 154 147 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.0 363 136

4 MAX 1292 535 500 463 3.4 2.5 2.5 1.8 595 247

Page 8: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

8

Historic SAIDI-IEEE & Total

Page 9: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

9

Historic SAIFI-IEEE & Total

Page 10: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

10

Historic CAIDI-IEEE & Total

Page 11: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

11

2019 SAIDIOrdered by IEEE w/ME, Feed & Plan

Page 12: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

12

2019 SAIFIOrdered by IEEE w/ME, Feed & Plan

Page 13: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

13

Total (STD) SAIDI 2019

Page 14: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

14

Total (STD) SAIFI 2019

Page 15: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

15

Total (STD) CAIDI 2019

Page 16: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

16

Major Event Excluded (IEEE SAIDI 2019)

Page 17: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

17

Major Event Excluded (IEEE SAIFI 2019)

Page 18: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

18

Major Event Excluded (IEEE CAIDI 2019)

Page 19: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

19

Distribution Only (WOF) SAIDI 2019

Page 20: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

20

Distribution Only (WOF) SAIFI 2019

Page 21: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

21

Distribution Only (WOF) CAIDI 2019

Page 22: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

22

Forced Distribution Only (WOP) SAIDI 2019

Page 23: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

23

Forced Distribution Only (WOP) SAIFI 2019

Page 24: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

24

Forced Distribution Only (WOP) CAIDI 2019

Page 25: IEEE Benchmark Year 2019 Results for 2018 Data 2019 ......2 MEDIAN 184 133 111 106 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 157 109 3 Q3 338 162 145 144 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 236 134 4 MAX 3444 484 466 400 2.9 2.3

25

Questions

25