31
DOI: 10.4018/JCAD.2021010101 Journal of Comparative Asian Development Volume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021 1 Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s Infrastructure Investment in Africa Ehizuelen Michael Mitchell Omoruyi, Center for Nigerian Studies under the Institute of African Studies, Zhejiang Normal University, China ABSTRACT ThecontinentofAfricamustindustrializetoeradicatepovertyandcreatejobsforits12millionAfrican youthwhojoinitsworkforceyearly.Oneofthemajorfactorshinderingindustrializationhasbeenthe insufficientstockofproductiveinfrastructurethatwouldpermitcompaniestothriveinindustrieswith robustcomparativeadvantage.WithinthecontextofAfrica-Chinacooperation,Chinahasemerged asakeypartnertoseveralAfricannations,includingfinancingaswellasconstructinglarge-scale infrastructureprojects.WithemphasisontheTazararailway,Mombasa-Nairobirailway,andGhana Buihydropowerdam,thispaperemploysbackwardandforwardlinkagestheorytoinvestigatewhat rolethesethreeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojectsplayinAfricaninfrastructuredevelopmentand whattheinfrastructureinvestmentleadstoconcerningcreatingnewopportunitiesandbusinessesfor Africa.ThepaperdiscoversthatthesethreeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojectshavemultiplegains and linkages for and beyond the three various projects areas. Above all, these three Chinese-led infrastructureprojectswereseenbytheChinesegovernmenttofulfilitsgoalsinAfrica. KeywoRDS Africa, Backward, China, Financing, Forward Linkages, Infrastructure 1. INTRoDUCTIoN Fiveofthetoptenfastestgrowingeconomiesintheworldin2019areinAfrica,andfourinSub- SaharanAfrica(SSA)(Deloitte,2019).Yet,forGDPgrowthtoproducestructuralchangesrequired acrossAfrica,itneedstobeinclusive.Essentially,morefocusmustbeplacednotonlyonquantity (high growth) but also on the qualitative aspect of growth. All these can be possible if African economiesinvestmoreininfrastructure.Thisisbecauseinfrastructureholdsatransformativepower intheglobaleconomy.NowondertheChineseproverbsays:“Ifyouwanttoprosper,firstbuild roads”(Deloitte,2018).ThatwaswhywhenChinalauncheditsowneconomicdevelopmentitbuilt roads,ports,ruralpowerplants,modernizedagriculture,invitedinfactoriesandexperimentedwith differentapproaches:specialeconomiczonesforinstance.TheChinesedidthisbecausetheyknow that through the construction of electricity, roads, ports, airports, railways, and communications networks,nationscanpowerthehomesoftheircitizensandcommerce,connectproducerstomarkets, and share information speedily, thereby boosting worldwide and regional trade, competitiveness, economicopportunities,andthequalityoflife(Sy,2017). With that said, notably, better infrastructure can benefit African the economy through these threechannels.Firstly,cheapertransportcostscanhelpcreatenewmarketsandrealizethereturn Thisarticle,originallypublishedunderIGIGlobal’scopyrightonJanuary1,2021willproceedwithpublicationasanOpenAccessarticle startingonFebruary19,2021inthegoldOpenAccessjournal,JournalofComparativeAsianDevelopment(convertedtogoldOpenAccess January1,2021),andwillbedistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/)whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andproductioninanymedium,providedtheauthoroftheoriginalworkandoriginal publicationsourceareproperlycredited.

Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

DOI: 10.4018/JCAD.2021010101

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

Copyright©2021,IGIGlobal.CopyingordistributinginprintorelectronicformswithoutwrittenpermissionofIGIGlobalisprohibited.

1

Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s Infrastructure Investment in AfricaEhizuelen Michael Mitchell Omoruyi, Center for Nigerian Studies under the Institute of African Studies, Zhejiang Normal University, China

ABSTRACT

ThecontinentofAfricamustindustrializetoeradicatepovertyandcreatejobsforits12millionAfricanyouthwhojoinitsworkforceyearly.Oneofthemajorfactorshinderingindustrializationhasbeentheinsufficientstockofproductiveinfrastructurethatwouldpermitcompaniestothriveinindustrieswithrobustcomparativeadvantage.WithinthecontextofAfrica-Chinacooperation,ChinahasemergedasakeypartnertoseveralAfricannations,includingfinancingaswellasconstructinglarge-scaleinfrastructureprojects.WithemphasisontheTazararailway,Mombasa-Nairobirailway,andGhanaBuihydropowerdam,thispaperemploysbackwardandforwardlinkagestheorytoinvestigatewhatrolethesethreeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojectsplayinAfricaninfrastructuredevelopmentandwhattheinfrastructureinvestmentleadstoconcerningcreatingnewopportunitiesandbusinessesforAfrica.ThepaperdiscoversthatthesethreeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojectshavemultiplegainsand linkages forandbeyond the threevariousprojectsareas.Aboveall, these threeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojectswereseenbytheChinesegovernmenttofulfilitsgoalsinAfrica.

KeywoRDSAfrica, Backward, China, Financing, Forward Linkages, Infrastructure

1. INTRoDUCTIoN

Fiveofthetoptenfastestgrowingeconomiesintheworldin2019areinAfrica,andfourinSub-SaharanAfrica(SSA)(Deloitte,2019).Yet,forGDPgrowthtoproducestructuralchangesrequiredacrossAfrica,itneedstobeinclusive.Essentially,morefocusmustbeplacednotonlyonquantity(highgrowth) but alsoon thequalitative aspect of growth.All these canbepossible ifAfricaneconomiesinvestmoreininfrastructure.Thisisbecauseinfrastructureholdsatransformativepowerintheglobaleconomy.NowondertheChineseproverbsays:“Ifyouwant toprosper,firstbuildroads”(Deloitte,2018).ThatwaswhywhenChinalauncheditsowneconomicdevelopmentitbuiltroads,ports,ruralpowerplants,modernizedagriculture,invitedinfactoriesandexperimentedwithdifferentapproaches:specialeconomiczonesforinstance.TheChinesedidthisbecausetheyknowthat through the constructionof electricity, roads, ports, airports, railways, and communicationsnetworks,nationscanpowerthehomesoftheircitizensandcommerce,connectproducerstomarkets,andshare informationspeedily, therebyboostingworldwideandregional trade,competitiveness,economicopportunities,andthequalityoflife(Sy,2017).

With that said,notably,better infrastructurecanbenefitAfrican theeconomy through thesethreechannels.Firstly,cheapertransportcostscanhelpcreatenewmarketsandrealizethereturn

Thisarticle,originallypublishedunderIGIGlobal’scopyrightonJanuary1,2021willproceedwithpublicationasanOpenAccessarticlestartingonFebruary19,2021inthegoldOpenAccessjournal,JournalofComparativeAsianDevelopment(convertedtogoldOpenAccessJanuary1,2021),andwillbedistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/

by/4.0/)whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andproductioninanymedium,providedtheauthoroftheoriginalworkandoriginalpublicationsourceareproperlycredited.

Page 2: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

2

to agglomeration, which in turn fosters competition, spurs innovation, lower prices, and raisesproductivity,therebyleadingtoasurgeinthestandardofliving(HenckelandMcKibbin,2010).Secondly,transportinfrastructurecanhaveadirecteffectontheeconomicefficiencyofaneconomybyreducingtransportcostsandanindirecteffectbyloweringinventories.Thirdly,asaneconomymovesuptheglobalvaluechain,adaptingitsinfrastructurecanbeacatalystforpromotingprivateactivitiesandindustrialization,andensuringthatenoughemploymentiscreatedforthe12millionyoungAfricanyouthenteringthelaborforceyearly,1attractingforeigninvestmentinothersectorsandincreasingbusinessconfidence,fostersinnovationandproductivity,promotethemanufacturingsector, skills development, integration, intra-African trade, tourism, competitiveness, economicopportunities,qualityoflifeandleadingtomoretradewiththerestoftheworld.ThisshowsthatinfrastructurecanhelppropelFDIandinturnhelptodevelopforwardandbackwardlinkageswhichwillpermitdomesticcompaniestobebetterintegratedintoglobalsupplychains.

With that said, Mckinsey Global Institute (MGI) estimates that infrastructure typically hasasocioeconomicrateof returnofaround20percent (MGI,2016). Inotherwords,onedollarofinfrastructureinvestmentcanraiseGDPby20centseventually.Simulationsshowthatindevelopingnations,increasingthepublic-investment-to-GDPratiofrom7.0percentofGDPto14.0percentofGDPinaboutthreeyearsandstabilizingitat9.0percentofGDPafterwardscansubstantiallyraisetheoutputby7.0percentoverthelongterm(IMF,2014).2Thepotentialbenefitsofinfrastructureareevenlargerwhenthenetworkandcross-sectoralimpactsandsynergiesareaccountedfor.TheWorldBankestimatesthatSSAgrossdomesticproduct(GDP)percapitagrowthwouldsurgeby1.7percentagepointyearlyiftheregionweretoclosetheinfrastructuregap(intermsofbothquantityandquality)relativetothedevelopingworldmedian.3

NowonderPark(1989)hasconfirmedthattheinfrastructureindustrygeneratesoneofthehighestmultiplier effects through its extensivebackward and forward linkageswithother sectorsof theeconomy.Assuch,foranationtodevelopthatnationneedstofirstmovefordevelopinginfrastructurefacilitiestothebackwardregionsofthenationtoboostuptheeconomicperformanceofthatnationbymeansoffacilitatingmajoreconomicactivities,namelyagriculture,industryandservice.Also,thenationfollowsthesamepathandtrytoinvestfurthersothatthereisaparallelsurgeinthelevelsofinvestmentexpenditureswhichacceleratetheprocessofgrowthanddevelopmentoftheeconomy.Theformeroneisknownastheforwardlinkageandthelatterisknownasthebackwardlinkage.

On the other hand, concerning forward and backward linkages, infrastructure can raise theproductivityofotherfactorsofproduction.Forinstance,installationofanovelirrigationsystemcanimprovethequalityoffarmland,therefore,raisingproductivityperhectareandshiftingtheproductionpossibilitycurveoutward(Todaro&Smith,2009).Thehigherproductivity,inturn,attractsmoreresources(privateinvestment)intoproduction,whichfurthercontributestohigherlevelsofoutput,theprofitabilityofproduction,incomeandemploymentinthesesectors.Thisindicatesthatacombinationofthesetworepercussionsmayhappenwheninvestmentbyonesectorleadstoinvestmentbyothersectorsinaparallelwayandtosayinotherwaysthattheforwardandbackwardlinkagesworksidebysidethatmayensuretheoverallgrowthanddevelopmentofanation.Notably,theimportanceoftheinfrastructuresectorstemsfromitsstronglinkageswithothersectorsoftheeconomy(WorldBank,1984).Thismeansthattheproperworkingofbothlinkagesgenerallyacceptedasacatalysttodevelopmentandthesoundbasesoftheinfrastructuralfacilitiesinmostcasesdefendtheeconomiesfromanyglobalshocks.

Withtheaboveforwardandbackwardlinkages,thereisaneedforurgentimplementationofreforms to improve institutions that foster private sector growth, develop local capital markets,strengthendomesticresourcemobilization,andimproveinfrastructure.ThiscouldalsomakegrowthinAfricamoreinclusive,reducingpovertyacrossAfricaandpromotingtheworldsharedprosperity,especially African nations. Therefore, infrastructure is featured in Goal 9 of the 17 SustainableDevelopmentGoals(SDGs)ofthe2030Agenda–“Buildresilientinfrastructure,promotesustainableindustrializationandfosterinnovation”andAspiration2ofAgenda2063,theAfricanUnion’svision

Page 3: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

3

forAfrica’stransformationoverthenextfivedecades.Assuch,scalingupinfrastructureinvestmentintheregioncouldhelpattainmuchneededhighergrowth.

Withthatsaid,notably,regionalinstitutions,includingtheAfricanDevelopmentBank(AfDB),theNewPartnershipforAfrica’sDevelopment(NEPAD),andtheUnitedNationEconomicCommissionforAfricaareactivelysupportinginfrastructuredevelopmentinthecontinent,thereisthepossibilitythatmeetingtheSDGsof2030andAfricanAgenda2063willrequireadecisiveactionasAfrica’sinfrastructureneedsremainimmense.Forexample,Sy(2017)claimsthatonly30percentofAfrica’spopulationhasaccesstoelectricity,34percenthasaccesstoroads,andtheinternetpenetrationrateiswobblylow,amere6percentcomparedwith70-90percentforotherdevelopingnations.Theauthoraddedthatinsub-SaharanAfrica(SSA),theinfrastructuredeficitisparticularlyacute,withthepoorestnationsinAfricafallingfarbelowotherlow-incomenationsonallinfrastructure-relatedindicators.

ToaddressthecontinentinfrastructuredeficitandcompletelyattainGoal9oftheSDGsandAspiration2ofAgenda2063,governmentswillneedtoaccelerateandintensifyeffortstomobilizedomesticandexternalfundingresourcesforinfrastructuredevelopment.Notably,SSAnationsspendalmostUS$60billionfromtheirnationalbudgetsoninfrastructuredevelopmentin2012(Sy,2017).Althoughthisamountissignificant,thisamountfallsshortoftherecentestimatebytheAfricanDevelopmentBank(AfDB)thatputthecontinent’sminimuminfrastructureneeds–fornationstosustainthegrowthoftheireconomies,population,incomelevelandreplaceageinginfrastructure–atUS$130billiontoUS$170billionyearly;atleasthalfofthatrequirementisrecentlyunfinanced(AfDB,2018).

So,wherecanAfricangovernmentsfindthenecessaryfundingtocarryouttheseprojects?AsubstantialportionoftheseinvestmentsarenowcomingfromAfricangovernments,donors(ICAmembers),andnon-traditionalsources:Theprivatesectorandemergingnations,especiallyChina(seeTable1)(Fosteretal.,2008;UNCTAD,2008;Moyo,2009;AfDB,2018).Africannationsarenowseekingfinancialresourceswellbeyondforeignaid;asaresult,thisopensupopportunitiesforpossibleAfrica-ChinaCooperation.

WithafocusonthesethreeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojects-Tazararailway,Mombasa-Nairobirailway,andGhanaBuihydropowerdam,thispaperemploysbackwardandforwardlinkagestheorytoinvestigatewhatthesethreeChinese-ledinfrastructureprojectshave ledtoconcerningcreatingnewopportunitiesandbusinessesforthecontinentofAfrica.Assuch,thepapermostlyreliesonmultiple data sources such as archives, second-hand materials, and international organizations reports thathavealreadybeenundertakenonthistopictoelucidateandcomprehendtheexistingprocessofAfrica-Chinacooperationbyfocusingoninfrastructureprojects.

Table 1. Trends in Infrastructure Finance in Africa, by Source ($ billion)

Source 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average

Africangovernments 26.3 30.5 43.6 24 26.3 30.1

Donors(ICAmembers) 18.7 25.3 18.8 19.8 18.6 20.2

MDBsandotherbilaterals 1.7 2 3.5 2.4 3.1 2.5

China 13.7 13.4 3.1 20.9 6.4 11.5

Arabnations 5.2 3.3 3.4 4.4 5.5 4.4

Privatesector 9.5 8.8 2.9 7.4 2.6 6.2

Total 75.1 83.3 75.4 78.9 62.5 75.0

Source: The Infrastructure Consortium for Africa (ICA) 2017; AfDB, 2018

Page 4: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

4

Thein-depthpartofthispaperwillbethecasestudiesoftheTazararailway,Mombasa-Nairobirailway,andGhanaBuihydropowerdamthatillustrateasmallpartoftherealityofthistopic.Fromthesecasestudies,identificationoflinkageswillbeofferedanddeliberatedon.Therefore,oneofthesignificantaimsofthispaperistoidentifylinkagesthatemergefrominfrastructureprojectsinAfricacomingfromChina.ItisinthiscontexttheauthoranalyzesthelinkagedevelopmentasawindowofopportunityforAfrica’sinfrastructureinvestment.

2. LINKAGe DeVeLoPMeNT AS A wINDow oF oPPoRTUNITy FoR AFRICA’S INFRASTRUCTURe INVeSTMeNT

Thispaperisframedbytheconceptofbackwardandforwardlinkagestheory.Backwardlinkagesareestablishedwhenthegrowthofoneindustryleadstogrowthamongsupplyingindustries,whileforward linkages evolve when the growth of one industry leads to the growth of industries thatusetheiroutputsasinputs.Moreso,backwardlinkagescreateadditionaldemandfortheoutputofupstreamsectorswhich,inturn,inducesanaugmentedupstreaminvestmentandanaugmentedlevelofcapacityutilization,aswellasapossibleupstreamtechnologicalupgrading.Theoveralleffectontheeconomydependsonthetypeofsectorstowhichasectorbackwardlyconnects(Tregenna,2008).Bycontrast,theforwardlinkagesofasectorimpactdownstreamsectors.Therefore,decreasingcostsofasector’soutputcanresult ingrowth-inducingeffectsondownstreamindustries.Thesecouldcomprisedownstreaminvestment,technologicalupgrading,oraugmentedproductivityandresourceutilization.Boththesegrowthinducingmechanisms–backwardandforwardlinkages–areso-calledHirschman-typeproductionlinkages(Tregenna,2008).

TheconceptofbackwardandforwardlinkageswasintroducedbyAlbertHirschman(Hirschman,1969);developmentplannershavelongusedtheconcepttoinvestigatestheseinteractions.However,fewanalystshaveafocusoninfrastructuredevelopment.Basically,whatitdoesisthatit triestodescribetheeconomicconnectionbetweenthebuyerandtheproducer(Guo,2013).Inotherwords,alinkageexistswheneveranongoingactivitygiverisetoeconomicorotherpressuresthatleadtothetakingofnewactivity(SenderandSmith,1986).Thelinkagesrecognizedintheeconomicliteratureovertheyearscompriseofthosearisingdirectlyfromtheproduction(backward,forwardandsidewayslinkages),andconsumptionordemand,butalsofrominfrastructuralexternalities,lateralmigrationoftechnologiesandfiscalrevenues(Hirschman1958;1981;Mteghaetal.,2012;WalkerandJourdan,2003).Somenationshavebeenmoresuccessfulinensuringthatlinkagesmaterializethanothersandthisistiedtothemechanismthatisused,oragency.Therelationshipbetweenlinkagesandagency(notnecessarilythestate)determinesthesystemofaccumulationofeconomieswhichinturnshapesthestructureoftheeconomy(FineandRustomjee,1996).

Nowadays,ithasbeensaidthatusually,theprojectproduceslinkagesandthetheoryarguesthatthemorelinkagesaprojectcreatesthebetteritisand,therefore,mostinvestmentsshouldbeboostedintothatcertainprojectthananywhereelse.AnobviousinstancetodescribetheselinkagesisbyusingtheinstanceofthesteelindustryprovidedbyDadvar(2016)wherethebackwardlinkagesarecoalandironminingandforwardlinkagesare,forexample,cannedgoods.Whentryingtounderstandalong-term,ongoingprocesslikeinfrastructureprojectthistheorycanbeagoodwaytodemonstrateinrealtermswhattheseprojectsresultin(Hirschman,1969).

Intermsofwhattheseinfrastructureprojectsproduce,thecontinentofAfricaneedstoprovidejobopportunitiestomillionsofyounginhabitants,openintra-tradeaswellasinternationaltraderoutesandprovidethebestopportunityforAfricannationstoliftthemselvesoutofthetrapsofisolation,poverty,andmarginalization.Onlymassiveinvestmentininfrastructurecancreatethewindowofopportunityrequiredtomaximizeprofit,minimizecost,createmultipliereffectsandopenopportunitiesthatenabletheactivitiesofothersectorsliketourism,agriculture,extractiveandindustrialsectorstofunctionand,inturn,allowsthecontinentofAfricatoeradicatepovertyandattainsustainabledevelopment.Simultaneously,thiswillhelpfacilitatedynamicprocessesoftechnologicalinnovation,

Page 5: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

5

skillsdevelopment,knowledge-intensificationandcapitalaccumulation.Linkagedevelopment ininfrastructureinvestmentcanopenvitalopportunitiesinthisrespect.

By advancing backward and forward linkages to the infrastructure sector, African nationscanmaximizedirectandindirect jobcreationeffects.Ontopof that,steadyincreasesinlinkagedevelopmentcanoffersignificantopportunitiesforAfricannationslabor-intensiveandsmall-scaleenterprises,employingsemi-skilledandcasualworkers,helpsmallandmedium-sizedenterprisesovercomefrequenttransactioncosts,electricityandwateroutagethatusuallycreatebarriersforfirmstoentermarketsandraiseentrepreneurship,ultimatelyaffectinghouseholdincomegrowth,consumption,andvulnerabilitytomacroeconomicshocks.Moreover,asforsoftinfrastructuresectors,constructionfirmscanstimulatelocalemploymentbutalsogeneratespillovereffects,suchasskillsdevelopment,managementexperience,andtechnologytransfer.Forsoftcommoditysectors,resource-processingindustriescanbolsterrawmaterialsupplies,4whichcreatefurtherjobopportunitiesintheagriculturalsector.However,alltheseopportunitiesinresource-processingindustriesneedinfrastructuresuchasrailway,roads,water,ports,communication,powergridsandserviceproviderssuchastransporterstofunctionwhichworkasbothforwardandbackwardlinkages.Therefore,developingbackwardandforwardlinkagestotheinfrastructuresectorscancontributetodevelopmentofAfricaneconomies.Thisisbecause,byintegratingforwardlinkageswithgoodinfrastructureinplace,Africannationscananticipateaccruinghigherexportrevenuesandforeignearnings(MorrisandFessehaie,2014).

Intheglobalarena,infrastructureisessentialforparticipationinglobalvaluechains(GVC)toupgradetheeconomicstructure.GVCsrefertothediversevalue-addedconnections,composedofseveralactivities,requiredtobringaproductfromconceptionanddesigntoitsdeliverytothefinalconsumerand,finally,toitsdisposal(KaplinskyandMorris,2001).ThisGVCsofferopportunityforleastdevelopednationstoalleviatepovertybysnowballingincomeandcreatingemployment.Kummritzetal.(2017)discoveredbothbackwardandforwardGVCsparticipationcanleadtothegrowthofdomesticaddedvalue,basedonadatasetcovering61nationsand34industriesbetween1995and2001.Improvinginfrastructure,includinghardinfrastructureandsoftinfrastructure,isanecessaryconditionforreapingthebenefitfromtheparticipationinGVCstoupgradetheeconomicstructure.Reliableinfrastructuretoconnectsupply,andefficientmovementofgoodsandservicesacrossborders, fastand reliable information transfer, andsufficiently lowcoordinationcostsareprerequisitesforparticipatinginGVCs.AsarguedintheWorldBankReportTransformation through Infrastructure,infrastructuredevelopmentiscriticaltodeliveringgrowth,reducingpoverty,addressingtransactioncostsandbroaderdevelopmentgoals(WorldBank,2012).

Linkages from infrastructure development can help propel industrial development and thisindustrialdevelopmentcanopenopportunitiesforpositiveexternalitiesthatarehardtoquantify.Withinfrastructuredevelopment,Africannationscanpromotediversificationoftechnologicalcapabilitiesandoftheirskillsbasebydevelopingbackwardlinkagesupplycompaniestothecommoditysectorsandresource-processingindustries.Also,becausethenaturalresourcesectorusuallyrequiresthedevelopmentofinfrastructuretoextractandtransporttheoverwhelmingbulkcommodities,potentialforlinkagesisenhanced.Thistendstooccurmorefrequentlywithahighvolumeofmineralresourceswhichgenerallyneedshighwaysandrailways.Asthesearedevelopeditturnsouttobeeasiertoadvancesupplierandresource-processingactivities,whichinturnraisetheeconomiesofscope5asforfurtherinfrastructuredevelopment.Thispositiveexternality,however,isuncommoninthecaseofcommodities likeoil,goldanddiamonds,whichpromoteenclave-kind infrastructure (PerkinsandRobbins,2011).Forthoselinkagesinvolvingknowledge-intensiveservices,thekeyelementsofinfrastructurearelikelytobetelecommunications,securityandairtransport,whereastheprovisionoftangibleinputsintothecommoditiessectorandtheprocessingoftheoutputofthecommoditiessectoraremostlikelytorequirehardinfrastructuresuchasroadsandrail.

With thatsaid, theevidenceabove indicates that therehasbeenasteadyupsurge in linkagedevelopmentandthattherearesignificantopportunitiesfordeepeningthisprocess.Assuch,iftheprocess is deepened, linkage development can also create the opportunity to maximize positive

Page 6: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

6

externalitiesderivedfromclusters.Whensupplierandresource-processingindustriesarehavinggoodinfrastructuresuchasconstantelectricity,goodroads,andbeingpositionedclosetotheextractionlocation, there are agglomeration effects.6Theprocessesof agglomeration arebackedbypublicinfrastructure,particularlyinthetransportsector.Backtotheclusteraspect,nevertheless,efficiencybenefitsfromcompaniessituatedinclusterincludegainingaccesstoapooloflabor,andtospecializednetworksuppliers.ThisisspecificallyvitalforthecontinentofAfrica.Bypromotingspecializedsupplynetworks,buyersaccrueadvantagesintermsofloweringtransactioncosts,reducingstocks,shorteningdeliverytimes,andsnowballingflexiblytoadjusttonovelproducts.Henceinfrastructureplaysacriticalroleinalltheseprocessesreachingthemarketandinprovidingthenecessaryinputsforproduction.

Basedonlinkagedevelopment,Krugman(1991)displaysthatmanufacturingcompaniestendtolocateinregionswithlargermarketdemandstorealizescaleeconomiesandminimizetransportationcosts.Lowtransportcostspermitlargerscaleproduction,whichinturncreatesinvestmentactivitiesinotherindustries.Fromthedevelopmentviewpoint,oneofthemostvitalfeaturesofanyindustryistheextenttowhichitcangeneratedemandfortheproductsofotherindustries.Anindustrymayencourageinvestmentbothinthesubsequentstagesofproductionbyforwardlinkageandinearlierstagesthroughbackwardlinkage.Thiscreatesemployment,generatesincomesandtriggersspilloverintorural,servicesandsupplyingsectors;thisisparticularlyvitalforAfrica.

Furthermore,speakinginmorecontemporarytermsofdevelopmentthatcirclesverymucharounddevelopmentassistance, soas for these investments tocontribute toan industrial transformationitrequirestosubstituteforbackwardandforwardlinkages(Brautigam,2009).Thereisageneralagreementindevelopmentliteraturethatbasicinfrastructure–rangingfromtransportandpowertowater,sewagesystemsandtelecommunications–isaprerequisitefordevelopmentand,moreover,foranyeconomytofunction.NowonderBrautigam(2019)citingDrown(2011)statementassertsthatwhenNgoziOkonjo-Iweala,avicepresidentoftheWorldBankandformerfinanceministerofNigeria,askedtheChinesehowNigeriacouldattain10percentgrowthlikeChina,theyreplied:‘Infrastructure– infrastructureanddiscipline’.This isparticularly relevant in theearlystagesofdevelopment,whenprovisionofinfrastructuregeneratesitsownlinkageswithinthedomesticeconomy.

3. THe STATe oF INFRASTRUCTURe IN AFRICA

Thepositiveimpactofphysicalinfrastructureoneconomicprosperityandbusinessiswellidentified.Improvedinfrastructureservicessuchastransport,electricity,telecommunications,sanitationandseweragesystemspositivelyaffectproductivityandencouragemoreregionalintegrationandtrade.Africahasrecentlyexperiencedsubstantialeconomicgrowth,withanaverageannualgrowthrateof4.7percentbetween2000and2017(AUC/OECD,2018).SimulationsproposethatimprovingAfrica’s infrastructure could boost GDP growth by an additional 2.2 percent a year (Foster andBriceno-Garmendia,2010).Increasedaccesstoinfrastructurecanalsofacilitatemoreintra-regionaltrade,particularlyfollowingthesigningoftheAfricanContinentalFreeTradeArea(AfCFTA)pactinMarch2018.In2015,intra-Africantraderepresented18percentoftotalexportsinAfrica,a10percentsurgesince1995,althoughstillarelativelylowfigurebycomparisonwithAsiaandEurope.Intra-regionaltradefortheseareasstandsat59percentand69percentrespectively(Sow,2018).

ImprovingconnectivityisalsoessentialtoenhanceAfrica’sintegrationintoregionalandglobalvaluechains.Effectiveandefficienttransportnetworksenablefirmstoreachouttoregionalandinternationalmarketsatalowercost.Inadditiontofasterdeliveryofgoodsthroughimprovedcross-borderroads,railways,andinternationalportsandairports,Africannationscouldimportrawmaterialsandintermediategoodsmorecheaplyandexportmanufacturedproductsmorecompetitively.

Inothercases,physicalinfrastructurecanalsoservetherequirementsofothersectors,usersandproducers–thisisbroadlyknownas‘corridordevelopment’.Speakingofacorridordevelopment,IndiaEXIMBank(2018)reportcitingtheWorldBankhasestimatedthataroundUS$200billionworth

Page 7: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

7

oftradeinAfricaiscarriedbytheregion’strunkroadnetworkincludingstrategictradingcorridorsconnectingdeepsea-portstoeconomichinterlands.Thesenetworksincludeabout10,000kmofroads.Apartfromthis,between60,000and100,000kmofroadsarerequiredtoprovideintra-continentalconnectivitybywayofanintra-regionaltrunknetwork.Hence,itcanbesaidthatthelackoftransportinfrastructureisbackholdingeconomicintegrationofAfrica.ThishighcostofinfrastructurepersistsinthecontinentofAfrica,andcanhaveamajorimpactonregionalcompetitivenessaswellasreducetheworldwidecompetitivenessofthecontinent’sexportsandlimitsthesectorsinwhichAfricancompaniescompete.

Thehighcostofinfrastructureispresentacrossseveralsectors,imposingadditionalcostsonbusinessesand reducingproductivity.Forexample, thepoorqualityof road, railwayandharborinfrastructuregeneratesanadditional30percentto40percentofcostsforintra-Africacommoditytrading(UN-Habitat,2014).Nowadays,goodstravelingbetweenLagos(Nigeria)andAccra(Ghana)arefrequentlytransportedbysea,despitelandproximitybetweenthetwocities(OECD,2018).TheportofLomeinTogo,asmallWest-Africannation,hasbecometheleadingportintheWestAfricanregion,whileLagos’portinNigeriahaslost30percentofitscontainertrafficsince2015duetoabnormallyhighcostsandnotoriouscongestion(Dynamar,2018).Regardless,infrastructureservicesaretwiceasexpensiveaselsewhere,reflectingdiseconomiesofscaleinproductionandhigh-profitmarginsduetocompetition.Forinstance,theaveragecostofimportinga20-footcontainerinAfricaisUS$2,793withanaveragedeliverytimeof38days.Whiletheaveragecostofimportinga20-footcontainerinSingaporeisUS$440withanaveragedeliverytimeof4days(Bond,2016).Moreover,poortransportinfrastructureaccountsfor40percentoflogisticscostsincoastalnationsand60percentinlandlockednations(UN-Habitat,2014).

Inconsideringbarriersagainstinfrastructureandlinkagesdevelopment,thepaperalsodelvesintothestateofinfrastructureinAfrica’sagriculturalproductionsector.Notably,theregion’seconomyismostlyagrarian,butfarmersareunabletomoveupthevaluechainwithoutelectricityforprocessingandforpreservingproduce.Asaresult,thedearthofinfrastructureinAfricahasmadethecontinent’sdomesticmarketforagriculturalproductionlessdeveloped.Forinstance,localsuppliersarenotalwaysabletomeetdemandsbecauseelectricpowerisnotreadilyavailable.Shortagesofpowerandwatersuppliesandinadequateinformationandcommunicationstechnology(ICT)infrastructurecanreduceproductivitybyasmuchas40percent(AfDB,2013).Almost5percentofyearlysalesarelostduetoelectricaloutagesinSub-SaharanAfrica(SSA);thecostoffuelforbackuppowergenerationwasestimatedtobeatleastUSD5billionin2012(OECD/IEA,2014);asaresult,productsaremoreexpensiveforconsumers.

Thisisasectorwhichisfrequentlyseentohaveaquintessentialenclaveactivity,solelydedicatedtocommodityexportsandwithfewexternalitiestothesurroundingeconomy.Withthatsaid,theabsenceoftransportlinkagesbetweenruralandurbanmarketslessenopportunitiesfortheevolutionofagriculturefromsubsistencetomarket-based.TheagriculturalsectorremainslargelynotmodernizedalthoughitcontinuestobethebiggestsectorinAfricaneconomies,accountingfor20percentofregionalGDPand65percentofemployment;thissectorhasthepotentialtobemuchmoreproductivewithsustainableenergysources(IEA,2015).

Asforelectricity,thereareoverthirtyAfricannationsexperiencingpowershortagesatpresentandthisisleadingtoeitherexpensiveshort-termfixesorpowerblackouts.ThishasactedasbrakesinAfricadevelopment.AlmosthalfofAfricans(600millionpeople)didnothaveaccesstoelectricityin2018,while about80percentofSSA firms suffered regular electricitydisruptions leading toeconomic losses (IEA, 2019a). For those that do have electricity access in the region, averageresidentialelectricityconsumptionpercapitaisequivalenttoabouthalftheaveragelevelofChinaorone-fifthofEurope(Bond,2016).

Mostmanufacturingactivitiesrequirereliableaccesstoelectricityforseveralhoursaday,atapricethatstillkeepstheactivitiescompetitiveinthemarket.Forthisreason,Africaambitiontoacceleratean industrial expansioncontinues tobehampered in severalnationsby theunreliable

Page 8: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

8

powersupply.Onlyahandfulofnations–includingSenegal,Ghana,Ethiopia,SouthAfrica,KenyaandRwanda–aresuccessfulinreachingfullaccesstoelectricityby2030.ThecontinentstrugglestosustainGDPgrowthinpartisduetothedearthofelectricity(Castellanoetal.,2015).Withthatsaid,figure1showspopulationaccesstoelectricityinChinaanddifferentAfricaneconomies.WhileChinahasahighaccessrateof100percentandMongolia90percent,Africalagsonthisindicator,withthehighestaccessratesat85percent.AverageaccesstoelectricityintheWestandSouthernAfricaisatabout35percent;inEasternAfrica,itisaslowas19percent(Calabreseetal.,2017).Asforregionalelectricityoutagesinamonth,thestudyshowedthatChinahasareliableenergysupply,withanaverageof0.1outagepermonthsorabitmorethanoneeveryyear.Incomparison,theSSAgrouprateisinbetween,withfewerthan3outagesamonthonaverage.Whatismore,SouthernandEasternAfricasufferfromfeweroutages(about5permonth)whereasinWestAfricathesearemorecommon(over13permonthonaverage)(seefigure2).

As for firms that are using generators, the same study shows that the low reliability of theelectricitysupply isconfirmedby the fact that innumerousAfricaneconomies,companiesowngeneratorstominimizedisruptionintheproductionprocess.Notably,50percentoffirmsoperatinginAfricahavegenerators.Particularly,thenumberishigherinWestAfrica(66percent)andinEasternAfrica(54percent)comparedwithSouthernAfrica(30percent)(seeFigure3)(Calabreseetal.,2017).Also,intheabsenceofsupplyfromtheformalsystem,numerousmiddle-incomeAfricans,desperateforelectricity,installhigh-costdieselgenerators.Suchgeneratorsarepollutingandthecostofelectricityproducedisamultipleofwhatelectricityfromthemodernsectorwithtechnologywouldcost.SuchaddedcostslessenthecompetitivenessofAfricancompanies.Besidesthis,intheabsenceofelectricitysupply,almost730millionrelyonthetraditionaluseofsolidbiomass(mainlyfuelwoodandcharcoal)forcooking.Yearly,almost600,000prematuredeathsthatoccurredinAfricaareattributabletohouseholdairpollutionresultingfromtraditionaluseofthesesolidfuels.

Becauseofthesechallenges,Calabreseatal.(2017)studyaddedthatSSAelectricitypriceishigherthaninChina.OnlyslightlyinEasternAfrica(US$0.16)andconsiderablyinWestAfrica(US$0.30)(seefigure3).The authors affirm thatAfricapricesarenoteven,nonetheless,whilesomenationshavepricesmuchlowerthanChina’s price(Zimbabwe,Mozambique,Zambia,DRC,Sudan,SouthAfrica,andEthiopia),someothershaveveryhighenergyprices(especiallySierraLeone),drivingtheaveragevalueup.

As such,basedontheInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA)outlook,SSAelectricitydemandisanticipatedtotripleby2040,toreach1.300terawattsperhour(TWh).Also,by2040,totalpower

Figure 1. Access to Electricity, 2012. Source: Calabrese et a., 2017.

Page 9: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

9

generationcapacityisanticipatedtoquadrupleto385Gigawatts.Thereportaddedthatby2040,demand for the industry will double while residential demand will grow by over five times ofcurrentlevels.By2040,atarateof6percentperyear,electricitydemandgrowthwillsurpassGDPgrowth(IEA,2014).Africahasampleprimaryenergyresourcestomeettheinfrastructuredemandmentionedinitially:recoverableoilresourceswillbesufficientfornext100years,coalforother400yearsandgasforover600years,andrenewableenergysources(geothermal,hydro,wind,andsolar)areabundant(IEA,2014).

Withthatsaid,Figure4showsthattheproportionofSSA’spopulationhavingaccesstopipedwater,electricity,flushtoiletsandlandlinetelephonyisconsiderablyhigherinurbanareasthanin

Figure 2. Electrical outages in a month, various years. Source: Calabrese et a., 2017.

Figure 3. Price of Electricity, various years. Source: Calabrese et a., 2017.

Page 10: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

10

ruralareas.Progressintheprovisionofsocialinfrastructurehasatbestbeenslow,andmoretypicallynon-existent.Thiscontrastswithotherlow-incomeeconomiesinwhichtherehasfrequentlybeensubstantialheadwayininfrastructureprovision.Forinstance,SSAhasthreetimesmoregeneratingcapacitypercapitain1970thanIndia,butby2000IndiahadsurpassedSSAandhadtwiceasmuchpercapitacapacityasSSA(Fosteretal.,2008).Therefore,beyondthepooravailabilityofinfrastructureistheslowrateofheadway(seefigure5).

Onthepositiveside,Lomas(2012)assertsthatmobilephonenetworkshaveexpandedspeedilyinthecontinentreaching80percentofthepopulation,from2percentin2000.Africaasawholerecordedthelargestleapincellularsignalcoveragefromnearly23percentofthepopulationin2003to88percentin2012(TheAfricanCapacityBuildingFoundation,2016).

Thecontinenthasalsodevelopednewservices,suchasM-Pesamobilemoneytransfer–pioneeredinEastAfrica–onitsnetworkplatform(AfDB,OECD,andUNDP,2014;Shapshak,2018).Simply

Figure 4. The rural-urban divide in Africa’s infrastructure. Source: Derived from Foster et al. 2008 and cited in NEPAD, 2015.

Figure 5. Slow progress in infrastructural development in Africa. Source: Derived from Foster et al, 2008 and cited in Source: NEPAD, 2015.

Page 11: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

11

gainingaccesstoM-Pesamobile-moneyservice,2percentofKenyahouseholdswereliftedoutofpovertybetween2008and2014 (Tompsett,2018).According to theWorldBankGlobalFindexDatabase,“thepoweroffinancialtechnologytoexpandaccesstoanduseofaccountsisdemonstratedmostpersuasivelyinSSA.”Thiswasmentionedduringthebank’sfinancialinclusionsurveywhichdiscovered21percentofadultsintheregionpresentlyhaveamobilemoneyaccount(WorldBank,2017a).Thisis“almosttwicethesharein2014andeasilythehighestofanyregionglobally.”Seetable2forasummaryofsomedataregardingregionalruralaccesstothemobilecellularlink.Ingeneral,theastuteadoptionofnoveltechnologyallowspoorlyendowednationsduetothecapabilityto leapfrogolder technologiesprevalent inmoredevelopednations;mobilephones areonebestinstanceofthisphenomenon.

Fortransport,hightransportcostadds75percenttothepriceoftheproductintheregion.Asforthenation,forinstance,improvingKenya’sinfrastructureuptothelevelofmiddle-incomenations,wouldbolsterannualgrowthbyover3percentpointsandforNigeria,thiswouldmeananupsurgeinyearlyrealGDPgrowthbyalmost4percentagepoints.7ClosingtheinfrastructurequantityandqualitygaprelativetothebestperformersintheworldcouldraisethegrowthGDPpercapitaby2.6percentperyear(WorldBank,2017b).

Moreso,figure6highlightstheeffectofutilizationlossesinelectricity,water,andtransportonGDPforthemostaffectedlow-andmiddle-incomenations,including21Africannations.Africannationscompriseatleasthalfofthetop15most-affectednationsineachcategoryofinfrastructuredisruption.Speakingofinfrastructuredisruption,itaffectsfirmsthroughvariousimpacts(seeTable3)andcostsfirmsoverUS$300billionperyear(Hallegatteetal.2019).Mostvisiblearethedirectimpact;afirmrelyingonwatertocoolamachinemusthaltproductionduringdryout;arestaurantwith an electric stove cannot cook meals without power. Disruptions leave production capacityunused,reducefirms’sales,anddelaythesupplyanddeliveryofgoods.Assuch,thelargestpotentialgrowthbenefitsthatthecontinentofAfricaenvisagedwouldcomefromclosingthegapinelectricity-generatingcapacity,water,transportandmostespeciallyfrominfrastructuredisruption.

To close the continent infrastructure gap, new estimates by the African Development Bank(AfDB)suggestthatAfrica’sinfrastructurerequiresUS$130-170billionyearly,withafinancinggapintherangeofUS$67.6-US$107.5billion(AfDB,2018)peryear;higherthanthemostwidelyquotedfigureonAfrica’sinfrastructureneedsofUS$93billion,from2006AfricainfrastructureCountryDiagnostic(ACID)study(quotedinFosterandBriceño-Garmendia,2010).Tomakethemattermoredifficult,sluggisheconomicgrowthhasputconstraintsonAfricangovernmentbudgetswhiletheBaselIIIrules8makeitharderforbankstofreeupcapitalforinfrastructurelending.

Table 2. Rural access to mobile cellular link

Region General mobile cellular coverage (%)

Rural population coverage (%)

Rural population covered (millions)

Rural population not covered (millions)

Africa 88 79 498 129

Americas 99 96 171 9

Asia 92 87 2,017 309

Europe 100 98 196 3

Oceania 98 84 3 0.6

World 93 87 2,886 451

Source: The African Capacity Building Foundation, 2016

Page 12: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

12

Figure 6. Top 15 nations with greatest utilization rate losses, by type of infrastructure disruption

Table 3. Disrupted infrastructure services have multiple impacts on firms

Sector Direct impacts Coping costs Indirect impacts

Power ●Reducedutilizationrates(US$38billionayear)

●Saleslosses(US$82billionayear)

●Generatorinvestment(US$6billionayear)

●Generatoroperationcosts(US$59billiona

year)

●Higherbarrierstomarketentryandlower

investment

Water ●Reducedutilizationrates(US$6billionayear)

●Saleslosses

●Investmentinalternativewatersources

(reservoirs,wells)

●Lesscompetitionandinnovationduetolackof

smallandnewfirms

Transport ●Reducedutilizationrates(US$107billionayear)

●Saleslosses●Delayedsuppliesand

deliveries

●Increasedinventory●Moreexpensivelocationchoicesfor

instance,inproximitytoclientsorports

●Inabilitytoprovideon-demandservicesand

goods●Diminished

competitivenessininternationalmarkets

Telecommunications ●Reducedutilizationrates●Saleslosses

●Expensivelocationchoicesclosetofast

internet

             

Source: Hallegatte et al. 2019Note: Highlighted in bold are the impacts for which original estimates are presented in this section. Estimates cover low-and middle-income nations

Page 13: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

13

Assuch,Africannationsarepresentlylookingforfinancialresourceswellbeyondtheirowndomesticrevenuesandforeignaid,anditswillingnesstotakeoutChineseloanstoplugthefinancinggap. The Africa infrastructure gap and financing is also broadly acknowledged by individualgovernments, African regional organizations, such as NEPAD9, the East African Community10,SADC11,andECOWAS12,byUnitedNationsagencies(particularlytheUNECA13),byDevelopmentBanks(suchastheAfricanDevelopmentBank14),theInternationalFinancialInstitutions(particularlythe World Bank) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),DevelopmentAssistanceCommittee(DAC)aswellasindividualbilateraldonors.AlthoughAfrica’sfinancingmaynotbemetsolelybyChinesefinancing,China’sroleisseenbymanyasimportant.Withthatsaid,itisinthiscontextofinvestmentandweakinfrastructuralprovisioninAfrica,theauthortriestoidentifyforwardandbackwardlinkagesinChineseinfrastructureinvestmentinAfrica.

4. IDeNTIFICATIoN oF FoRwARD AND BACKwARD LINKAGeS AND ANALySIS oF CASeS

InfrastructuredevelopmentiscriticaltothecontinentofAfricaeconomicdevelopmentandpovertyreduction.Thatiswhypresently,itisinfrastructureAfricannationsneedmostandinfrastructureiswhatChinaismostequippedtooffer.ItisnotlostonseveralAfricanleadersthathardlyfourdecadesagoChinawasinthesamepositionthecontinentofAfricaistoday–abackwaternationwhoseeconomymadeuphardlytwopercentofworldwideGDP.However,overthepastfewdecades,Chinashockedtheworldinthewaythatitusedinfrastructuretopropeleconomicgrowth,creatingahigh-speedrailnetworkthatpresentlytop29,000kilometers,pavingover100,000kilometersofnovelexpressways,constructingover100novelairports,andconstructingnolessthan3,500novelurbanareas–whichcomprise500economicdevelopmentalzonesand1,000city-leveldevelopments(Wade,2019).Overthisperiod,China’sGDPhasgrownmorethan10-fold,rankingnumbertwogloballynowadays.

Therefore,ChinaandAfricaregardinfrastructuredevelopmentascrucialfordevelopmentofthecontinentofAfrica,especiallysinceinfrastructuredevelopmentplayedamajorroleinChina’sownpovertyalleviationaswellaseconomictransformation.China’sapproachtoinfrastructuredevelopmentinafundamentallydissimilarwayfromitscounterpartsintheWestbothhomeandoverseas.China’sapproachisrelationalandfitstherecentAfricanUnionAgenda2063vision;assuch,numerousAfricangovernmentsarelookingtoChinatobringtheirexperiencetotheirnations;nowonderratherthanforeignaid,Chinesecompanieshavebroughtemployment,training,noveltechnologyandfinancing(Reuben,2018),andsupportingAfricatodevelopthecontinent’sinfrastructuresector(seetable4andfigure7).Figure7showsthatmostfinancedprojectsareintransport,shippingandportsectors(52.8percent),followedbyenergyandpower(17.6percent),realestate(14.3percent),includingindustrial,commercialandresidentialrealestate)andminingsectors(7.7percent).

Asdisplayedinfigure7,investmentininfrastructureandcapitalprojectscanbeessentialtodiversifyeconomiesandpromoteprivatesectoractivitiesandindustrialization,ensuringenoughjobsarecreatedfor12millionyounginhabitantsenteringAfrica’sworkforceeachyear(Deliotte,2018).Withthatsaid,economicliteratureidentifiesthesignificanceofChina’sinfrastructureinvestmentasoneofthekeycatalystsbehinddevelopmentintheregion(GodfreyandRoss,2016).China’semphasisonAfrica’sinfrastructureconstructionintensifiedwiththelaunchingoftheBeltandRoadInitiative(BRI).Asaresult,incontrasttoseveraltraditionaldonornationscenteringonsocialsectors,China’slendingagenciesoffersignificantloansforinfrastructureprojectsinAfrica(ChenandNord,2018).

Chinese loans have assisted to finance large-scale investments in infrastructure, energy andmining,therebyclosingthecontinentcriticalinfrastructuredeficit,creatingeconomicstimuliwitha largepositiveeffectongrowthandprosperity (Kuo,2018).Basedon theDeloitte report, thusfar, by 2018, China-Africa Development Fund (CADFund) had invested over US$4.6 billion inmorethan90projectsin36Africannations.Thereportaddedthatoverall,Chinahaspartakeninmorethan200Africaninfrastructureproject,makingChinathesinglelargestfinancierofAfrican

Page 14: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

14

infrastructure,15financingoneinfiveprojectsandconstructingoneinthree(figure8).16Inaddition,Chinesefirmshavecompletedandarebuildingprojectsthataredesignedtoassistaddtoorupgradenearly30,000kmofhighways,2,000kmofrailways,85milliontonnesperyearofportthroughputcapacity,overninemilliontonnesperdayofcleanwatertreatmentcapacity,nearly20,000MWofpowergenerationcapacity,andover30,000kmoftransmissionandtransformationlines(Deloitte,2019).TheDeloittereportaffirmsthatthevariousprojectsareanticipatedtoboostlocalexportsbyUS$5.8billionandcreatethelocaltaxrevenueofUS$1billion.

Nottomentiontheinfluenceviaspillovereffectsofconstructionprojects,suchassignificantexportsofmachineryandtransportequipmentandlaborexports(workersoncontractedprojectsandworkersdoinglaborservices).Notably,lookingatChina’sfootprintinAfrica’sinfrastructuredevelopmentpath, it is in thiscontext theauthoranalyses theforwardandbackward linkagesofdifferentinfrastructurecasesthatChinahasinvestedinsofar.

Figure 7. African investment in infrastructure and capital projects by financing source. Source: Deloitte, 2018 Note: EU Nations include Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway and Portugal. Single Nations include Angola, Brazil, Ghana, India, Japan, Macau, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria, Russia, South Korea, Switzerland and Thailand.

Table 4. Trends in infrastructure finance in Africa, by source ($billion)

Source 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average

Africangovernments 26.3 30.5 43.6 24 26.3 30.1

Donors(ICAmembers) 18.7 25.3 18.8 19.8 18.6 20.2

MDBsandotherbilateral 1.7 2 3.5 2.4 3.1 2.5

China 13.7 13.4 3.1 20.9 6.4 11.5

Arabnations 5.2 3.3 3.4 4.4 5.5 4.4

Privatesector 9.5 8.8 2.9 7.4 2.6 6.2

Total 75.1 83.3 75.4 78.9 62.5 75.0

Source: AfDB, 2018

Page 15: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

15

Analysis of CasesCase 1: Tanzania-Zambia RailwayBehind the seemingly bleak outlook, there is a silver lining in terms of diversity in some otherAfricannationskeentoinvestheavilyininfrastructureprojectstoboostgrowth,oftenwithChina’sinvolvement.Therefore,theChinesegovernmenthasshownremarkableprowessininvestinginAfrica’sinfrastructuresector.Chineseinvolvementistraceablebacktothe1960s,whentalksopenedwithTanzaniaandZambiatoanambitiouspost-colonialrailwayfromDaresSalaamtoKapiriMposhi,just north of Zambia’s capital, Lusaka. The Tanzania-Zambia Railway also known as TanzaniaZambiaRailwayAuthority(TAZARA)isabinationalrailnetwork,extending1,860km,with975kminTanzaniaand885kminZambia(seetable8),andthenetworkisbasedontheCapeGaugewithawidthof1,067mm,builtbetween1970and1975(Brautigam,2009;Atsushietal.,2017).TheTAZARArailwayisgenerallyregardedasChina’sfirstlarge-scaleventurefinancedbyChineseloanduringtheMaoera,forwhichChinaprovidedazero-interestloanof$570million,morethanallotherChinese-sponsoredoverseasprojectscombinedpriorto1975(Donghai,2016).ThepurposeoftherailwayprojectistoendlandlockedZambia’sdependenceonRhodesia(Zimbabwe)andSouthAfricabygivingthenationanalternativeoptionforcoastalaccess(Monson,2013:47).

Figure 8. China’s share of regional and continental project activity. Source: Deloitte, 2018.

Table 5. Tanzania: Rail networks (km)

Tanzania Railways Limited (TRL) 2,582 TAZARA 1,860

Centralline 1,254 Tanzania 975

TangaLine 437 Zambia 885

LinkLine 188    

MwanzaLine 378    

MpandaLine 210    

SingidaLine 115    

Source: Atsushi et al., 2017

Page 16: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

16

ThescaleandthecostoftheprojectandthecommitmentshownbytheChineseindeliveringitontimeinthefaceoftherefusalofthefundingoftheprojectbyWesternnationsandtheWorldBankisoftenpointedtobytheChineseasasymboloftheirfriendshipwithandcommitmenttoAfrica.ItshouldbenotedinpassingthatthiswastheperiodoftheColdWar,andthatperhapstheWesternunwillingnesstofinancetheprojectcouldbebecausetheyviewedtheprojectthroughtheColdWarlens.TobuildtheTazararailway,theChineseneededtoboretenkilometersoftunnelsandconstruct300bridges,whichrequiredshiploadsofmaterialsandequipment.ItalsoinvolveddozensofChineseministries,whichdidputenormouspressureonChineseaid(Brautigam,2009).Atcompletion,89millioncubicmetersofearthandrockshadbeenmoved,320bridges,22tunnelsand225culvertsbuilt(Xinhuanet,2019).Xonstructionoftherailwayservedasablueprintforfuturelarge-scaleChineseprojectsinAfrica.Withthatsaid,themostsignificantforAfricaaswellastheoutsideworldistoknowifthesesortsofprojectshavecreatedbackwardandforwardlinkages.Basedonthisinstanceseveralofthesecanbeexamined.

Researcherswhostudytheissueofskills-transferfromChineseconstructioncompaniesidentifythat,asearlyasthe1970s,duringtheconstructionoftheTazararailway,“AfricanandChineseworkersnotonlylaboredsidebysidebutalsoengagedinwhatwasknownas“technicalcooperation”,asChineserailwayexpertstrainedtheirAfricancounterpartsintheworkplaceandtechnicaltrainingshops”17.Specifically,Brautigamaffirmsthat16,000skilledChineseworkerswereemployedandtensofthousandsofAfricansworkers(Brautigam,2009).AnotherstudyalsofoundthatChineseconstructioncompaniesprovideemployeeswithon-the-jobtraining,focusingparticularlyonmachineoperation.18ThesecontributionsandbenefitsfrombuildingtheTazararailwayregardingemploymentopportunitiesandskilltransfershowthatforwardlinkagesforincreasinglaborareskillstheseworkerslearntandgain,whichtheymaytakeintootherfirmsorusetosetuptheirownfirmsinfuture.

Alternatively, this could also be seen as a backward linkage because in order to build andimprovetherailwaytheprojectwillneedworkersandsopeopleturnouttobeanessentialfactorfordevelopmentoftheproject.Whilecreatingemploymentopportunitiesandtransferringskillstothepeopleisnotonlyaninvestmentfortheproject,itisalsobeneficialforthefutureofthehosteconomy.

Withrespecttolabor,trainingcentersandengineeringworkshopshaveemergedasawayofpreparingandraisingknowledgetonovelworkersaboutthiscertainkindofindustrybutalsoawayoftrainingpeopleandgivingthemaccesstoskillsandknowledgethatservestheindustryneedsaswellaspracticalskillsandexperiencethatareneededtoworkandmeetconstructionfirminterests.Also,theseinvestmentscanbereferredtoasbackwardlinkagesasinvestinginrailway,directlyledtogrowthintrainingcenters,thisimpliesthattheconstructionfirmisdirectlyinvestinginhumancapital.

Withthatsaid,overthepastfourdecades,TazarahasbeenplayingavitalroleineconomicandsocialdevelopmentofTanzaniaandZambia.indicatingthattherewasagreatneedfortheTazarafacility.Thisisbecause,fromtheenvironmentalperspective,thestudyshowsthattherailwayhasanimportantadvantagetofostersustainabletransportation(Koppetal.,2013).Also,therailsectoraccountsforonly3.6percentoftotaltransportemissions,whileitcontributestomorethan8percentofthetotalmovementsofpassengersandgoodsovertheworld(IEAandUIC,2015;Atsushietal.,2017).Railcarries6.3percentoftheglobalpassengertransportdemandand9percentoftotalfreightdemand(seetable9).Therefore,itwasagoodidealforbothTanzaniaandZambiagovernmentstobuildtheTazararailway.Forinstance,Zambiaisalandlockednationasstatedinitially,tosurviveeconomically,thenationmustimportfood,rawmaterialsandminingequipment.Likewise,thenationmustexportcommoditiessuchascopperwhichaccountsfor90percentofthenation’sexportearnings.

TherailwaywasneededtoreducedfreightratesfortransportingcopperfromMbeyatoDas-es-Salaam,stimulateagriculturalandlivestockdevelopmentintheregionandupsurgeZambiaandTanzaniaopportunitiesforexternal trade.For instance,nearly31miles(50kilometers)fromtheZambianbordersliestheTanzaniatownofMbeya.TheplateauandhillnationsurroundingMbeyaholdconsiderablepotentialforcultivationofgrain,oilseedandothergoods.AboutmidwaythroughTanzaniaistheKilombero’sValley,whichevenpresentlyisTanzania’smajorsourceofsugarcane.

Page 17: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

17

Kilombero’swell-watered,fertilesoilholdsgreatpotential.Besidessugarcane,itissuitableforgrowingriceandvegetableandforraisinglivestock.WiththerailwayprovidingeasytransportationfromtheportcityofDas-es-SalaamtoMbeyaandNewMposhiinZambiaandotherdiversevillages,itwasagoodreasontosetupagriculturalproduction,andthishasmadetradewithintheregionmucheasier.Backwardlinkagesincludefarmers’purchaseoffarmproductionitems(seed,fertilizer,chemicals,etc.),whileforwardlinkagesincludetheprocessingoffarmproducts,andthetransportationofthoseprocessedproducts.ThishasexternalitiesforothernationsintheregionhastheinfrastructureisalsoavailableforotherneighboringnationssuchasMalawiandSouthernDemocraticRepublicofCongo,whicharepracticallylandlockedintheregion.

Thenatureofinfrastructurehasanimportantimplicationfordevelopmentoflinkages.Someinfrastructureishighlyspecifictoacommodityproducer,andhasverylowpotentialforpositivespilloverswhichmightfacilitatethegrowthofbackward,forward,orhorizontallinkages.Forexample,theTazararailwaylinebetweenZambia’slandlockedcopperbeltandtheportofDaresSalaaminTanzania,theinfrastructurehasthecapacitytomeettheneedsofmultipleusers,bothfeedingintoandoutofcoppermines,andfeedingintoandoutofothersectorsoftheeconomy.NowonderZambiawasabletoexportitscoppertoEuropethroughTanzaniawithoutusingtherailwaybuiltbyBritainandcontrolledbythenwhite-ruledSouthAfrica,

Monson (2009) affirms that the Tazara railway facilitated trade within the region for vitalperishable and non-perishable goods. The railway line was able to reduce the distance forcommunication and enables firms to take advantage of novel business opportunities and createforwardlinkage.MonsonaddedthattheTazararailwayledtoeconomicdevelopmentinotherpartsoftheEastAfricanregionandothersectorssuchasthehydroelectricpowerplantatKidatuandthepapermillatRufiji(Monson,2009).ThisisanothergoodexampleofbackwardlinkagecreatedfromconstructingtheTazararailway.Likewise,itcanbeaforwardlinkagesincethepowerplantgenerateselectricpowerforthetraintorun.

AlthoughtheTazararailwayhasproducedalotofpositiveadvantages, ithashadnumerousproblemssinceitscompletion,especiallythedearthoftherequiredtechnicalmaintenance,upgrade,and ineffective operation and management. Sun affirms that China has complained that thegovernmentsofTanzaniaandZambiaonly“manage”butneverinvestintheTazaraRailway,andtheWesternmanagementsystemtheyadoptedhaspreventedChineseinvolvementinthekeymanagementissuestoimproveitsperformance.SunaddedthattheproblemscausedduringtheoperationprocesshavebeenblamedonthequalityofChineseconstruction,whichhastarnishedtheimageofChineseprojectsinAfrica(Sun,2017).

HavinglearnedtheselessonsfromtheTazaraRailway,ChinaisdeterminedtoobtainmanagementrightsforboththeMombasa-NairobiandAddis-Djiboutilines.Ehizuelen(2017)affirmsthattheAddis-Djiboutilineadoptsthe“6+2model”,inwhichChinaRoadandBridgeCorporation(CRCC)andChinaRailwayGroup(CRG)willoperateandmaintaintherailwayforsixyearsuponthelaunchofoperationandprovidetwoadditionalyearsoftechnicalsupportduringthegradualhandoverofmanagementauthorities.Headdedthatinthesameway,CRBChasreacheda10-yearagreement

Table 6. Global transport modal share (%), 2012

  Passenger (passenger-km) Freight (ton-km) Total (Transport unit)

Road 82.7 8.8 31.3

Aviation 10.6 0.7 3.7

Navigation 0.3 81.5 56.8

Rail 6.3 9.0 8.2

Source: IEA and UIC, 2015; Atsushi et al., 2017

Page 18: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

18

undera“5+5model”withKenyaRailwaysCorporationtakingovertheoperationandmaintenanceof theMombasa-Nairobi line, including the traindispatch system,maintenanceof railways, andthelocomotives(Ehizuelen,2017).The“5+5model”meansthattheKenyansidewillconductaperformanceevaluationoftheservicebyCRBCbythefifthyear.

Inbothcases,Chinaclaimsthatitistrainingasignificantnumberoflocaltechnicalemployeesandproviding technical transferunder the frameworkof capacitybuilding.This is an importantsustainabilityissuethatAfricanpolicymakersandleadersshouldseriouslyconsiderwhenitcomestosuchhugeundertakingsinAfricainthefuture,notonlyinpartnershipwiththeChinesebutalsowithotherforeigngovernmentsandfirms.

Case 2: Mombasa-Nairobi Standard Gauge RailwayOneofKenya’stopdevelopmentalchallengescontinuestobetheshortageofphysicalinfrastructure.Greater economic activity, enhanced efficiency and increased competitiveness are hampered byinadequate transport, communication, water and power infrastructure. The world is eager to dobusinesswithKenya,butfindsithardtoaccessKenyanmarkets,especiallyintheinterior,becauseofpoorinfrastructure.Physicalinfrastructurecoveringtransportation,powerandcommunicationviaitsbackwardandforwardlinkagesfacilitiesgrowth;whilesocialinfrastructureincludingwatersupply,sanitation,sewagedisposal,educationandhealth,whichareprimaryservices,hasadirectimpactonthequalityoflife.Withoutthisinfrastructure,Kenyawillnotattainthegrowthlevelsanticipatedorneeded.Assuch,infrastructureplanningandinvestmentare,therefore,criticalifKenya’smassiveeconomicanddevelopmentalpotentialistoberealized.

Withthatsaid,Infrastructureprojectsbringsymbolicbenefitsaswell,highlightingthenation’sindependenceandself-determination.Thisisparticularlytrueforrailprojects,whichoftenreplacecolonial-eralinesthatwereusedtomoveresourcesoutofAfrica,beforefallingintodisrepair.Assuch,thereplacementoftheold,colonial-eranarrowgaugetrackwiththe472kilometersMombasa-Nairobistandard-gaugelineworthUS$3.8billion19isthetransportsolutionandexperiencethathasbeenmissingsincetheKenya-UgandarailwayoveracenturyagoopenedupEastAfricabystimulatingthegrowthofbusinessesandtradingcentersalongtheNorthernCorridortransportsystem,andwillraisethespeedoftrainsontheline,from30kphto90kph20.TheMombasa-NairobiStandardGaugeRailway(SGR)builtbyChinaRoadandBridgeCorporationandfinancedlargelybyChinesecreditlines,closinga110-yearchapterofrelianceoncolonialinfrastructurewasinauguratedonMay31,2017.

AccordingtotheKenyaNationalBureauofStatistics(KNBS),thefastdevelopingeconomyofKenyathatishighlydependentonagriculture,tradeandtourism(KNBS,2019)neededanefficientrailwayespeciallyconnectingMombasa,themainporttoupcountry.TherailwaywilldefinitelyreducetrafficonthenotoriousMombasaroadbyabigmargin.Intheearlystagesofitsimplementation,themegainfrastructurewasperceivedasanyothergrandpublicinvestmentthatwouldaddtothestockofinfrastructureandimprovetransportation,easethecostofdoingbusinessfortheprivatesector,permitsconsumptionofcheapforeigngoods,andenablesenterprisestoexportlocallymanufacturedcoffee,tea,andleatherwithlowercost.Therailwaynotonlytransformpeople’slives,butalsowitnessedthedevelopmentofAfrica-Chinacooperation.Assuch,somecommentatorsconsiderChina’s“railwaydiplomacy”asaboonforAfrica(Phametal.2018).

Morlin-Yron(2017)assertsthatinAfricawhere,90percentofallAfricanimportsandexportsareconductedbyseathroughportsandspecificallyKenya,wherealmost4,000truckstraveleverydayfromMombasatoNairobi,therailwaybecomesveryadvantageousallowinggoodstofloweasilyfromportsinland.Initially,fortravelingbetweenthesetwobiggestcities,Kenyanseithertookveryexpensiveflights(USD150-200roundtrip)oroptedfora12-hourlongroadtrip(Wuetal,2019).TheSGRwasproposedwasabletoremedythesehindrancesandshortenedpassengertraveltimetoalittlemorethanfourhoursandfreighttransportationtolessthaneighthours(GlobalRailwayReview,2017).TheMombasa-NairobiSGRhasestablishedbackwardandforwardlinkageswiththeeconomybyfacilitatingtheseamlessmovementofbulkcargo,alreadyferriedtwomillionpassengers,

Page 19: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

19

significantlyincreasinglocalbusiness,improvedtourismopportunitiestoKenyanhinterlandandacrosstheborders.TheSGRpullsalongthemanufacturingsectorandstimulatesdomesticandinternationaltrade,therebypositioningitasaregionallogisticshub.

Notably,manufacturing,oneofPresidentUhuru’s‘Big4’(foodsecurity,affordablehousing,manufacturing, and affordable healthcare for all) pillars of development in his second and finalfive-yearterm,willbethegreatestbeneficiaryoftheSGR.TheSGRlinkstheplannedNaivashaExportProcessingZone(EPZ)andOIKariageothermalfields to theNairobi-Mombasarailway.Therefore,Kenya’supcomingexport-drivenmanufacturingandprocessingindustrywillnotonlytakeadvantageofcompetitivelypricedgeothermalelectricitybutalsobenefitfromdirecttransportationtotheMombasaportforexport.Asaresult,themodernrailwaysystem,whichhasbeenglorifiedandvilifiedinequalmeasure,willbeservingasanovelengineofKenya’seconomicgrowthandmakestheentireeasternregionmoredynamicentrenchingitselfasthenervecenterofsharedindustrialgrowthandeconomicprosperityfortheregion.

ChinasupportingAfricatobuildrailwaysisawayofjoiningthedotsinAfricaandforminglines;linesthatarecross-continentalandwillpotentiallychangeearliertradeandinvestmenttrendslaiddownbythecolonialists.TheSGRispartofChina’snovel“BeltandRoadInitiative”andaimtoopenEastandCentralAfricauptointernationaltradeandinvestment.Improvingconnectingisvitalforpromotingthecontinent’sgoodsandcommodityexports,whichcantherebyassistAfricannationstointegratemorefullyintoglobalvaluechains.AccordingtotheWorldBankreport,a1percentdecreaseintradecostsislikelytoraisebilateraltradebetweeneconomiesthatparticipateinBRIprojectsby1.3percent(ChenandLin,2018).TheauthorsaddedthattheinitialestimatesproposethattheBRItransportationnetworkscouldbolsterFDIonthecontinentby7.4percent,withthelargestimpactonGDPgrowthinSub-SaharanAfricaregion(ChenandLin,2018).

Therefore,improvementinthenetworkandcapacityofrailwaysandothercross-bordertransportinfrastructurecouldleadtosignificanteconomicbenefitseventually,boostingmoreintra-Africantradeaswellasaugmentedinvestment,therelatedtechnologyandskilltransfers,creatingemploymentandhighergrowthinAfricaneconomies.Thesewouldbeaboononthecontinent,whereendemicpovertyhascontributedtoinsecurityandinstabilityaswellasaprominentreminderofChina’spresenceinAfrica.Ontheotherhand,thiswouldimplythatforwardandbackwardlinkageswouldbecreatedasthebuilding,roads,andseaportswouldneedagreatamountoflabor,Asaresult,theSGRprojecthadcreatedover46,000localjobs(Mutethya,2018).Thequalityoflifeoftheseworkerswhocontributetothebuildingoftherailways,roadsandseaportswillimproveandthiscanaffecttheentireeconomyofthenationpositively.Likewise,theSGRprojectbroughtabout2,071Chineseworkers,mainlyinmanagementandengineering(KenyaandEconomicandTradeAssociation,2017).

OneofthemostvitalelementsofthecontractsignedbytheKenyagovernmentandCRBCwastheemphasisitplacedontraining.AtthebeginningoftheMombasa-NairobiSGRproject,CRBCsetupathree-prongedtrainingprogramforKenyanrailwayexperts(Wuetal.,2019).Thethreefocusareasincludedonthejobtrainingforlocalemployeesintheconstructionstage,trainingforrailwayengineeringpersonnelintheoperationstage,andpromotingjointeducationprogramsinrelatedmajorsbetweenChineseandKenyanuniversitiesrespectively.CRBCalsoworkedincooperationwiththeKenyangovernmenttosponsor60Kenyanhigh-schoolgraduatestostudyatprestigiousuniversitiesinChina(fouryearsinEnglishorfiveyearsinChinese)inrailway-relatedmajors(KenyaChinaEconomicandTrade,2017).Thefirstgroupof25Kenyanstookupthecoursein2016andanother35enrolledin2017(Mutethya,2018).Atleast2,000youtharesettobetrainedintheoperationandmaintenanceoftheSGR,accordingtothetransportsecretaryofKenya(BusinessDaily,2017).

Besidestrainingprograms,CRBClaunchedarailwaytechnologytransfertrainingcenteratVoiin2015tobuildthecapacityofKenyantechnicalworkers(DailyNation,2015).Arguably,thisisatangiblebenefitonthecontinentwhere60percentofyoungpeoplebetweentheagesof15and17arenotparticipatinginanyformofeducation(WENR,2019).Likewise,thisisaninvestmentwhichcreatesseveraldiverseformsoflinkages,vitalonesbothshortandlongtermswhichgowiththeconcept

Page 20: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

20

ofbackwardandforwardlinkages;themorelinkagesthatarecreatedthebettertheinvestmentisforKenyaandthecontinentatlarge.Forwardlinkagesrelatemoretothelong-termeffectofcapacitybuildingandthatthemoreengagedyoungpeopleareespeciallywithprimaryeducation,themoresuccessfultheywillbeinfuture.Though,investinginhumancapital,ortrainingconstructionworkersmightnotdirectlygoinlinewiththetheoryofbackwardandforwardlinkages,butitdoesshowthattheoutcomeofthebackwardandforwardlinkagesforbuildingtheSGRhasapositiveresultonthegeneraleconomyaspeoplebecomeeducated,trained,acquireskillsandgainfutureemployment.

Moreso,itwouldbenaturaltoassumethatopportunitiesforconstruction-relatedlocalindustrieswouldbetremendousasdemandformaterialsuchascement,steel,railwaysleepers,andsandneededforconstructionwouldsurge.Wuetal.(2019)basedontheirinterviewconfirmthishypothesisasthetermsofthecontractindicatethattheSGRprojectisrequiredtopurchasealltheconstructionmateriallocallyandutilize40percentoflocalcontentintermsofconstructionmaterialscivilworks,andjobopportunities.Thiswouldcreatebackwardlinkagestodifferentsectorsthatcanprovidematerialsandgoodsrequiredtocompletetheproject.However,Wuetal.(2019)affirmthatbasedonlocalentrepreneurs,includingcementandsteelmanufacturerssuggestedadissimilarrealitybysayingtheycouldnotcompetewithrawmaterialsimportedfromChinaandwere,therefore,losingbusiness.

Inaddition,therearesomeseriouschallengesconnectedwithoperationsoftheSGRthatimpedeitsabilitytorealizeitspotential.AccordingtoWuetal.(2019),thegovernmentforcesthemtousetheSGRforkeytransportationbetweenMombasaportstoNairobievenifthisinvolvesdelays,thusdistortingthelogicofsupplychains.ThenovelNairobiclearingofficeisunabletohandlesnowballingcargoandwhenthecargoisnotclearedinfourdays,thefirmisburdenedwithonerousUSD25perdayfine.AlthoughusingthehighwaywasmoreexpensivethanSGR,businesseshadrelationshipswithtruckfirmswhichensuredthefastandefficientmovementofgoods.

Ontopofthat,withinKenyansociety,theSGRisembroiledinmultiplecontroversiestypicalof accusation against other Chinese mega-projects, including issues of economic viability, cost,debtsustainability,corruption,andopaquecontractingandfinancingarrangements(Fosteretal.,2009).Duringconstruction,complaintsfromthelocalcommunitysurfacedaroundissuesoflandcompensation,environmentalimpacts,andimportedsourcingofmaterialsandlabor.Notably,thesecomplaintsareexplainableinpartbystakeholders’failuretoconsultwithlocalcommunityneeds.Theauthoralsosuspectsa tendencybyseveral locals todemandmorebenefits fromtheprojectthanispossible,anissueexploitedbylocalpoliticianstoextractpoliticalmileageoutoftheissuessurroundingtheSGR.Arguably,inmostplaces,theethnicandneo-patrimonialpoliticalcultureisbehindthecontroversiesandtheoccasionalviolence.Thisiscompoundedbyadeeplyentrenchedproblemofcorruption,rent-seekingandnepotism.21Withthatsaid,given that theseopportunitiesarecreated,thetougherjobforthecontinentofAfricaistogrowfromthem,try to manage China-Africa relations via these opportunities,andmaximizetheirgains.

Case 3: Ghana’s Bui Hydropower Dam LeavingtheTAZARAandMombasa-NairobiStandardGaugeRailwayfacilityandmovingontootherhardinfrastructuresuchastheGhanaBuihydropowerdam.Notably,thedearthofaccesstoelectricityacrossthecontinentofAfricaisacrucialimpedimenttothecontinent’seconomicgrowth.Thelackofpowergenerationcapacity,transmission,anddistributionnetworks,aswellaswell-establishedutilityframeworks,posessignificantchallengestothecontinentofAfricasocio-economicadvancement.BasedontheIEAreport,thecontinentofAfricaishometonearlyafifthoftheworld’spopulation,butaccountsforlessthan4percentofglobalelectricityuse(IEA,2019b).Asaresult,anappetiteforlargehydropowerprojectsbyAfricannationshasincreasedsignificantlyandcreatedanopportunityforChinesefirmstobuildthemuch-neededpowercapacityinAfrica.Asaresult,hydropowerprojectshavebecomethepreferredprojectsforChinesecontractors(seefigure9).TheChineseareinvolvedin52percentofallhydropowerprojectsintheregion(intermsofcapacity)followedby29.3percentinvolvementincoalprojectsand10.7percentingasprojects(PowerTechnology,2019).Notonly

Page 21: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

21

doesthisinvestmentfostershort-termdirectlinkagesbutalsomakepeopleliveseasierandperhapssnowballingtheirhumancapitalbyhavingaccesstoelectricpower.

Speakingofahydropowerdam,theGhanaBuihydropowerdamisacollaborativeprojectbetweentheGhanaiangovernmentandSinohydro,aChinesestate-ownedfirmspecializinginhydroelectricinfrastructureprojects.Completed in2013, theBuihydropowerdamwasconstructed toaddresstheelectricityneedsofBrong-Ahafo,Northern,UpperEast, andUpperWest regions,especiallyBrong-AhafoandNorthernregions,whichareadjacenttothedam.TheoverallcostoftheprojectreachedUS$622million,wheretheExport-ImportBankofChinaandtheGhanaiangovernmentwereco-financiers,andSinohydrowasthecontractoroftheproject.TheExport-ImportBankofChinadisbursedtwoseparatecreditlines,onecommercialandoneconcessional,ofUS$292millionandUS$306million,in2008and2009respectively.TheGhanaiangovernmentcontributedaloanofUS$60millionaswell(ChenandLandry,2016).ItisestimatedthatthedamwillraiseGhana’selectricitygenerationcapacitybyalmost20percent.

Construction of the Bui Dam was anticipated to increase the nation’s electricity generationcapacity;nonetheless,itwasnotonlyaboutelectrification.TheGhanaiangovernmentaimedtoboostcocoaexportstoChinathroughtheBuiDam’sloanpact.Asstatedinitially,theExport-ImportBankofChinaprovidedtwocreditlines.Toensurereimbursement,thegovernmentagreedtosecuretheloanswithcocoa;undertheirpact,aChinesefirmwouldpurchase30,000tonsofcocoaeachyearfromGhanaattheworldpriceuntil5yearsafterthedamwasoperational.ThepaymentsforthiscocoawouldgodirectlytotheExport-ImportBankofChina.Theremaininginterestandprincipaloftheloanswouldberepaidby85percentoftheelectricitysales(TangandShen,2019).AccordingtoaWorldBankreport,theloanpactalignswithGhanaPovertyAlleviationPlanIIanddebtdistressisatmoderaterisk(WorldBank,2008).

BasedonHanreport, theelectricityoutputproducedbytheBuiDamdidnotmeetpeople’sexpectations(Han,2018).ThedameventemporarilystoppedgeneratingpowershortlyafteritwasputintouseinJune2014.TheBuiPowerAuthorityclaimedthatthemaincausesbehindtheshutdownwereadearthofwaterinthereservoiraswellastheGhanaGridCompany’sintervention.Thesituationdidnotimprove,andwhenmajorpoweroutageshitin2016,thegovernmentdecidedtoimportpowerfromCoted’Ivoire.Besidesgenerationissues,transmissioncapacitywasalsoworrisome.Ghana’s

Figure 9. Power Generation Projects in Africa, Chinese Contractors vs Other Contractors (capacity additions, MW). Source: Power Technology, 2019.

Page 22: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

22

electricalstandardsarenotuniform.Thepowervoltageofthedamwasat161KV,whilethestandardusedintheUpperWestRegionis34.5KV.Thissituationledtotwoeconomiclosses.First,Sinohydrohadtoinvestmoremoneyinpowervoltageconversionfacilitiesandsecond,theselowervoltagesaugmentedenergylosses.Moreso,thenationwasadoptinganelectricityvoltagesystemat330KV,whichmeantthattheBuiDamhadtoadapttothenewstandardsaswell.

Furthermore,Hanaffirmsthatthelocalcommunityhadatoughtimebenefittingfromelectricityproducedbythedamformultiplereasons(Han,2018).First,theyhadnoelectricityaccessbeforeresettlement,whichmeanttheydidnotownappliancesorhavepriorexperienceusingelectricity.Second,resettledcommunitiesneededpaymentforlinkingtothegrid,creatinganadditionalbarrier.Lastly,withthepriceofelectricitysnowballinglocalshadlessincentivetobuyelectricity.

Withthatsaid,theBuihydropowerdamwasnotonlyaboutelectrificationaswellastoboostcocoaexportstoChina,itwasalsoaboutsubcontractingarrangements,skillsandtechnologytransfers,andtheprocurementofmaterialsandequipment.Asfortheaspectofsubcontracting,literatureonlinkagesintheconstructionindustryrecognizessubcontractingandotherformsofcooperation,suchasstrategicalliancesandjointventures,theaspectsofbackwardlinkages(PolenskeandSivitanides,1990;DevapriyaandGanesan,2002).Thesecollaborationsfacilitatetechnologyandskilltransfers,aswellasknowledgedevelopmentthatisnecessarytobuildlocalcapacityandenhancetheindustry’scompetitiveness.Notably,DevapriyaandGanesan(2002)studyonSriLankaandOfori(2000)studyonSingaporeindicatethatFDIrepresentamajormodalityforforgingsuchlinkagesviacollaborationwithJapanesecontractors.

Tsikudo(2019)affirmsthatdespitetheseconsiderations,SinohydroprovidednosubcontractsduringtheconstructionoftheBuidam.TheauthoraddedthattheBuiPowerAuthority(BPA)affirmedthatithadaconstructioncontractwithSinohydroandatimelinefortheproject.Toensuresuccessfulandon-timeprojectcompletion,Sinohydrohadtodeterminewhetheritwantedtosubcontractpartoralltheprojecttohastencompletion(Tsikudo,2019).ThisBPAclaimswasconfirmedbySinohydro.Moreso,TsikudoassertsthattheofficialofSinohydroaffirmedthatitscontractwithBPAwasaconstructionarrangementwithnosubcontractingrequirements.However,whenaskedwhethertheywouldhaveconsideredsubcontractingifneeded,theSinohydroofficialanswered:“Yes...anagreementisanagreement”.TsikudoaffirmsthattheBPAofficialsexplainedtheiragreementwithSinohydrowasnotaBuildOperateandTransfer(BOT)(Tsikudo,2019).TheSinohydrocontractonlyspecifiedthatSinohydrohadtodevelopagivenproject.Mostcontractsformajorbuildingprojects,liketheBuihydropowerdam,didnotofferthecontractoranyresponsibilitybeyondmerelybuildingthedam.ThedearthofspecificityintheoriginalcontractbeforetheprojectevenstartedstymiedthebenefitstheBuihydropowerdamcouldhaveproducedforthelocaleconomy.

Withthatsaid,whileliteratureonChineseconstructioncompanies’operationsinAfricasupportssubcontracting to other Chinese companies, there is no robust proof of subcontracting to localcontractors,especiallywithoutanexplicitobligationtodoso(Chenetal.,2009;ChenandOrr,2009).Thismeansthatenforcingsubcontractingwithlocalcontractorsmustoriginatefromtheproject’scontractinwhichallthemodalitiesareclearlystated.

AlthoughSinohydrodidnotprovideanysubcontracttolocalcontractors,theydidsowithotherstructuralworks.Forexample,alocalcontractorbuilta15-kilometeraccessroadwithintheprojectarea.Additionally, localcontractorsconstructedtworesettlementcampsfor thedisplaced.Theseinvolved building facilities, like markets, schools, sanitation systems, and housing units. Localcontractors also built a clinic, BPA’s permanent staff village, and transmission lines (includingpylons)connectingthepowerhousetosubstationsinSunyani.Localcontractorswhogainedfromthesesubcontractingarrangementshighlightedthepositiveimpacttheprojecthadontheiroperations,particularlyfinance(Tsikudo,2019).Tsikudogaveaninstanceofhowonecontractoraffirmedthat“eventhoughthisisagovernmentproject,wedonothavetomobilizefundsforitlikewefrequentlysowithothergovernmentprojects.Sinohydropaidusdirectly.Therefore,ratherthanmovingfrombanktobanksolicitingmobilization,wejustborroworusewhatwehaveandgetrepayment...there

Page 23: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

23

isnodelays inpayment.Tsikudoadded that inspiteof thepositive feelingsomesubcontractorslamentedonthelimitedinteractionstheyhadwiththeChinesecontractorduringtheirpartnershipasaresultoflanguagebarriers(Tsikudo,2019).

Asfortheaspectofprocurementofmaterialandequipment,Tsikudoassertsthatheavyequipment,likebulldozers,copperwire,turbines,andsteelfortheprojectweresourcedfromRussiaandChina.TsikudoconfirmsthataBPAofficialarguedthat“itiseconomicallysensibletoprocuresuchequipmentfromabroadbecausethereisnolocalsupplier.TheauthoraddedthatanotherBPAofficialaffirmedthat“therewasa15-yeargapbetweentheAkosomboandKpongDams,anda40-yeargapbetweentheAkosomboandBuihydropowerdams.Afirmthatspecializesintheproductionofspecializeddammaterialsrunstherisksoflosses”(Tsikudo,2019).Inadditiontoeconomicconcerns,someexpertsquestionedthequalityoflocalsupplies.

Bosshard(2009)arguesChina’sconstructionindustryisnowcompetitivebecauseofreformsitunderwentduringthe1990s.ChinesecontractorsspentyearsstudyingtheirWesterncounterpartswhilethegovernmenttooktimetoidentifythedeficiencies,andenactedaggressiveindustrialpoliciestotackletheissues.ThiskindofindustrialreorganizationcatapultedChinaintoaglobalhydrodamdeveloper.AlthoughSinohydrosourcedelectricitymaterialsandheavyequipmentfromabroad,itprocuredmaterials,suchasaggregatesandcement,locally(Tsikudo,2019).

Inadditiontoelectricity,boostingcocoaexporttoChina,subcontractingandprocurement,theconstructionandoperationoftheBuihydropowerdamwasanticipatedtodirectlyprovide3,000localjobs.Nevertheless,somecommentatorsareworriedaboutthelaborforcelocalizationofChinesefirmsinAfricannations.KernenandNam(2014)believethateventhoughChinesefirmsactivelyinvestinGhana,completelocalizationofChineseSOEsinGhanadoesnotyetexist.ThoughtheSinohydrohireslocalmanagementstaff,theyaremostlyemployedforexternaloperations,likesalesandhumanresources,forthereasonthatthefirmhopestobuildabetterimageofengagingthelocalcommunities.ThisindicateshowthedegreeofChinesemanagementlocalizationcanbelimited.

Nonetheless,thestudyshowsthattheBuiDamconstructionperiod,2009-2013,neededupto2,600personsfor65kindsofjobs.Ofthisnumber,91percentofemployeeswereGhanaian,whowereemployedasartisans,suchasmasons,carpenters,andelectricians.Otherswereemployedascasuallaborers,includingsecurityguards,drivers,andmanualdailywageworkersandtheywereunskilled before the construction of the Bui dam. The remaining 9 percent employees were theChinese (whonever surpassed400employees)andPakistanis (whowereabout100 for specificpositionlikemachineryoperators,welders,steelbenders)andtheyconstitutedtheexpatriatequotaallottedtothecontractor(Hensengerth,2011;Kirchherretal.,2016;Han,2018).TheGhanaiansreceivedthree-stagetrainingonceemployed.KarnenandLamaffirmthatduringonsitework,moreskilledChineseemployeesoftensupervised,mentored,andworkedwithlocalemployeesingroupsforaperioduntiltheGhanaiansemployeescompletelygraspedtechniquesandskillsforindependentwork(KermenandLam,2014).

The construction project not only offered many job opportunities in the local communitybuttransferredsometechnicalskills tolocalemployeesaswell.Constructionlaborexpertsviewemploymentasameansofearningalivelihoodandawayofdevelopingpeople’sskills(Ngowi,2001).Therefore,employmentinconstructionactivitiesremainsacriticalconduitforlinkages.Thebackwardlinkageinvolvesupgradingworkers’expertise.Forwardlinkagesrelatetotheacquisitionofnovelideasandskillsthatwillbenefitworkersinotherendeavors.ThesecontributionsandbenefitsfrombuildingtheBuidamregardingemploymentopportunitiesandskills transfershowthat theforwardlinkageforsnowballinglaboraretheskillstheseemployeeslearntandgain.

Alternatively, this could also be seen as a backward linkage because in order to build andimprovetheBuidamtheprojectwillneedworkersandsopeoplebecomeanessentialfactorforthedevelopmentoftheproject.Moreso,theconstructionandoperationofthedamprovideincomesforlocalGhanaiansworkers.Assuch,thehigherincomesthatareinducedthroughforwardandbackwardlinkagesareoftenre-spent,generatingaseriesofconsumptionexpenditures.Thesemultipliereffects

Page 24: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

24

aresecondarybenefits resulting from theBuidam.Whilecreating jobsopportunities,providingincome,andtransferringskillstotheinhabitantsisnotonlyaninvestmentfortheproject,itisalsobeneficialforthefutureGhanaeconomy.

HanaffirmsthattheBuiDamprojectmanagementofficesetupamedicalcenteronsitebecauseof thehigh incidenceofmalariaandotherwaterbornediseasesaswellas thedearthofmedicalfacilitiesintheregion.Toimproverelationsbetweenexpatriatesandlocals,theChinesegovernmentalsoorganizedonsiterecreationalactivitiesandmadedonationstolocalcommunitiesandschools.Incaseofinfrastructureinvestmentsforthemedicalcenter,recreationalactivities,oneinputandemergenceofabackwardlinkagetothesemedicalcenterandrecreationalactivitiescentersislaborbecausethemedicalcenterandrecreationalcenterwillrequireworkers.

Nonetheless,becauseofovertimeworkwhichtheworkerschallengedthemanagementisnotinlinewithGhanalaborlawsofworkingeighthoursperdayschedule,lowwages,anddearthofsecureleave,aswellashealthandsafetyrisks,twostrikesoccurredin2008and2013(ChipaikeandBischoff,2018).Ontopofthat,localworkersaccusedSinohydromanagementofdiscriminationbecauseoftheircounterpartsfromChinawereeachgivenaroomthatwasequippedwithair-conditioners.Theworkersalsocomplainofcasualization22;CasualizationisonelegacyofthestructuraladjustmentpolicyprogramsimplementedinAfricaduringthe1980sand1990s(Lee,2009).ItisacapitalistaccumulationstrategyofwhichtheChinesearetakingadvantageof.Theprocessinvolvestheofferofdayjobsandfixedcontractswithoutpensionsorlong-termsecurity.ThepracticewaswidelyusedbyChinesefirmsandinvestorsinZambiaandTanzania(Lee,2009).AlthoughthepracticeisnotuniquelyChinese,casualizationhasbeenadoptedbyChinesefirmsonotherpartsofthecontinentofAfrica.

Carmody(2011)consideredthelaborcasualizationphenomenonengagedbyChineseinvestorsinAfricaasacharacteristicof feudalism.Theauthor sees laborcasualizationas typicalChina’sindustrializationlevel.Accordingtothisview,Chinaisatadevelopmentstageinwhichcasualizationseem tolerable. Carmody also indicates that nowadays industrialized nations engaged in similarbehaviorsintheirearlydevelopmentstages.TheAfricanLaborResearchNetwork(ALRN)considerscasualizationasexploitativeandcriticizesAfricangovernments’seeminglyunconcernedattitude.ALRNobservesthatAfricangovernments’supineattitudestemsfromtheirfearofbeingviewedaslessbusiness-orientedandinvestor-friendly.Moreso,itaffirmsthatAfricangovernmentsactivelypromoteinvestmentuncritically.Theopen-doorapproachtoinvestmentshasdeepenedthecasualizationofAfricanlaborinChinesefirmsinAfrica.Casualizationcreatesjobinsecurityandenervatescollectivebargainingaimedatimprovingworkingconditions.Casualizationundercutspeople’scapabilitytoupgradetheirskillsandseekbetteremployment.Asaresult,alocallaborunionwassetupin2009.SinohydroalsosignedapactwithGhana’sTradesUnionCongressthatdemandedbothemployeesandsupervisorsbetterunderstandtheirrightsandobligations.

5. CoNCLUSIoN

ThispaperhascenteredonChina’sengagementwithAfricawithrespecttoinfrastructureprojects.Itisworthnotingthattheprevioustraditionalmodelsofinfrastructureinvestmentmightperhapsbemoreconnectedtotiedaidorresource-backedloans.Nonetheless,ithastakenalongtimebeforetheseformsofinvestmentshaveshownanyoutcomeand,therefore,theargumentmightbethatitistimeforAfricannationstostepawayfromatraditionalmodeltootheralternativessuchaswhattheChinesearedoingatthemoment–itmightbethebestwayformeetingAfrica’sneeds.

With that said,bydrawing instancesupondiverseChinese infrastructureprojects inAfrica,thispaperhasattempted to identifybackwardand forward linkages thathavebeencreated fromChinese infrastructure projects. The paper analyzed the developmental outcomes of the Tazararailway,Mombasa-NairobirailwayandGhanaBuihydropowerdam.ItisworthnotingthattheTazararailway,Mombasa-NairobirailwayandGhanaBuihydropowerdamcanbeconceptualizedascasesofvestedinterests.Theauthoritiesinchargeofthethreedifferentinfrastructureprojectssoughttheir

Page 25: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

25

implementationtoshoreuptheenergysupplyandbolstersocioeconomictransformation.Inadditiontothesegoals,thesethreedifferentprojectswereexpectedtoprovideemployment,irrigation,ecotourism,andsocioeconomicinfrastructurerespectivelywithinthesethreediverseprojectsareas.Ontopofthat,thestudydiscoversthatskillsamongstworkers’spillovertootherbusinessesandfirms,itisworthnotingthatcompetitioninlocalmarketscanpushlocalfirmstoinvestinnoveltechnologies.Withthesegoals,theTazararailway,Mombasa-NairobirailwayandGhanaBuihydropowerdamcanbeinterpretedashavingmultiplegainsandlinkagesforandbeyondthethreevariousprojectsareas.

Nonetheless,thethreevariousprojectswereseenbyChinesegovernmenttofulfillitsobjectivesinAfrica.Howthesegoalswereattainedisafunctionofstatecapacity.Astheanalysisshows,mostofthebenefitsforthesethreenationshavebeenpatchy.TherewasnosubcontractingforstakeholdersinGhanaBuihydropowerdam.Althoughsomematerialswereprocuredlocally,itwasonlydonebecauseimportseemedcostlier.Thegeneralprocessofprocurementregardingthesethreeprojectsimplementationfloutedthelocalprocurementlaw,forinstance,intheGhanaBuihydropowerdam(Tsikudo,2019).TheTazararailway,Mombasa-NairobirailwayandGhanaBuihydropowerdamalsocreatedalotoflaboruneasinessandanxietyviacasualization,whichcausedemployeesinsecurity,andhencelimitedbackwardandforwardlinkages.AlthoughthisisararecaseaswellassomewouldarguethatrelationshipbetweenChinaandAfricaismostlyatoxicone,bydrawingupondifferentinstancesofinfrastructureprojectsitcanbedemonstratedthatsomesignificantoutcomesarebeingmadeinthissectorwerebackwardandforwardlinkagesarecreatedandoffersnewopportunitiesforAfricannationstoadvance.

Linkagesarecrucial;nonetheless,onlyapurposivestatecaninduce,nurture,andsustainthem.Thestate-centeredframeworkrequiresactivestateinterventiontoshapetheoutcomesofChina-Africaengagements.ForAfricannations tocreate linkagesusingChinese infrastructure investments, itrequiresachangeinphilosophy.AfricannationscannotcontinuetouncriticallypromoteandsupportChineseinitiatives.Theexistingopen-doorpoliciesneedtogivewaytoamoreproductiveapproachinwhichAfricannationsobjectivesareintegratedintoproposedChina-fundedprojects.ThegoalforAfricangovernmentistomakesurethattherelationshipcontinuestobecooperativetocircumventexploitationatanytimes.

Inconclusion,totiethisfinalmarktogetherthispaperhasattemptedtodemonstratewhatrolethe Chinese-led infrastructure projects play in African infrastructure development and what theinfrastructureinvestmentleadstoconcerningcreatingnewopportunitiesandbusinessesforAfrica,andasthefinalanalysisrevealsbydrawinguponthethreedifferentinfrastructurecases–currentlytherelationshipisconsideredtobeacooperativeonewerebothAfricaandChinaarewinningfromit.

Page 26: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

26

ReFeReNCeS

AfDB. (2013).Supporting the Transformation of the Private Sector in Africa: Private Sector Development Strategy, 2013-2017.AfricanDevelopmentBankGroup.Retrieved10January,2020fromhttps://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Policy-Documents/2013-2017_-_Private_Sector_Development_Strategy.pdf

AfDB.(2018).AfricanEconomic Outlook2018.RetrievedJuly2,2019,fromwww.afdb.org/en/Knowledge/publications/african-economicoutlook/

African Development Bank (AfDB), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)DevelopmentCentre,&UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme(UNDP). (2014).Africa Competitiveness Report 2014.Geneva:WorldEconomicForum.

Atsushi,L.,Richard,M.H.,&Yonas,E.L.(2017).Model Choice between Rail and Road Transportation: Evidence from Tanzania.PolicyResearchWorkingPaper,WPS8174.WorldBank.Retrieved21June,2019fromdocuments.worldbank.org/curated/en/733781504010382743/pdf/WPS8174.pdf

AUC/OECD.(2018).Africa’s Development Dynamics 2018: Growth, Jobs and Inequalities.OECDPublishing.

Bond, J. (2016). Infrastructure in Africa. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies., 8(3), 309–333.doi:10.1177/0974910116677788

Bosshard,P.(2009).ChinaDamstheWorld.World Policy Journal,26(4),43–51.doi:10.1162/wopj.2010.26.4.43

Brautigam,D.(2009).The Dragon’s Gift: The Real Story of China in Africa.OxfordUniversityPress.

Brautigam, D. (2019). Chinese Loans and African Structural Transformation. In A. Oqubay & J. Y. Lin(Eds.), China-Africa and Economic Transformation (pp. 129–270). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198830504.003.0007

BusinessDaily.(2017).SGR Maintenance Training for 2,000 Youth.Retrieved17January,2020fromhttps://www. Businessdailyafrica.com/magazines/SGR-maintenance-training-for-2-000-youth/1248928-3521000-135upskz/index.html

Calabrese,L.,Gelb,S.&HouJ.(2017).What Drives Chinese Outward Manufacturing Investment? A Review of Enabling Factors in Africa and Asia.BackgroundPaper.SupportingEconomicTransformation(SET).

Carmody,P.(2011).New Scramble for Africa.Polity.

Castellano,A.,Kendall,A.,Nikomarov,M.,&Swemmer,T.(2015).Powering Africa.McKinsey.

Chen,C.,Goldstein,A.,&Orr,R.J.(2009).LocaloperationsofchineseconstructionfirmsinAfrica:Anempiricalsurvey.International Journal of Construction Management,9(2),75–89.doi:10.1080/15623599.2009.10773131

Chen, C., & Orr, R. J. (2009, November 1). Chinese Contractors in Africa: Home Government Support,CoordinationMechanisms,andMarketEntryStrategies.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,135(11),1201–1210.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000082

Chen,M.X.,&Lin,C.(2018).Foreign Investment Across the Belt and Road: Patterns, Determinants and Effects.WorldBank.Retrieved2June,2019fromhttp://documents.Worldbank.org/curated/en/394671539175518256/pdf/WPS8607.pdf

Chen,W.,&Nord,R.(2018).China and Africa: Whither the Belt and Road?Retrieved7April,2019fromhttps://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges-africa/news/china-and-africa-whither-the-belt-and-road

Chen, Y., & Landry, D. G. (2016). Capturing the Rains: A Comparative Study of Chinese involvement in Cameroon’s Hydropower Sector.ChinaAfricaResearchInitiative,WorkingPaperNo.2016/16.

Chipaike,R.,&Bischoff,P.H.(2018).AChallengetoConventionalWisdom:LocatingAgencyinAngola’sand Ghana’s Economic Engagements with China. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(7), 1–16.doi:10.1177/0021909618763922

Dadvar,B.(2016).China’s Role in African Infrastructure Development: Cooperation or Exploitation?LundUniversitySchoolofEconomicsandManagement.

Page 27: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

27

DailyNation.(2015).Chinese Firm Launches Railway Training Facility.Retrieved28December2019fromhttps://www.nation.co.ke/business/Chinese-firm-launches-railway-training-facility/996-2774228-vbb9bz/index.html

Deloitte.(2018).If You Want to Prosper, First Build Roads: Africa Construction Trends Report 2018.Author.

Deloitte.(2019).Africa in 2019 Outlook, Summary Report.Retrieved12July,2019fromhttps://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/za/Documents/africa/za_africa_in_2019_outlook_summary_report_022019.pdf

Devapriya,K.A.K.,&Ganesan,S.(2002).Technologytransferthroughsubcontractingindevelopingcountries.Building Research and Information,30(3),171–182.doi:10.1080/09613210110117593

Donghai,Y.(2016).Why the Chinese Sponsored the TAZARA: An Investigation about the People’s Republic of China’s African Policy in the Regional Context, 1955-1970.Retrieved7January,2020fromasianstudies.buffalo.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/58/2016/08/NYCAS-Donghai-Yu.pdf

Dynamar. (2018).West Africa Container Trades (2018). Retrieved21December, 2019 fromhttps: //www.dynamar.com/publications/207

Ehizuelen,M.M.O.(2017).EducationandSkillsDevelopmentinChina-AfricaCooperation.Frontier Education China,13(4),553–600.doi:10.1007/s11516-018-0030-0

EXIMBank.(2018).Connecting Africa: Role of Transport Infrastructure.Export-ImportBankofIndia,WorkingPaperNo.72.

Fine,B.,&Rustomjee,Z.(1996).The Political Economy of South Africa: From Minerals-Energy Complex to Industrialization.Hurst.

Foster,Butterfield,&Chen.(2008).TheChangingLandscapeofInfrastructureFinanceinAfrica:Non-traditionalSourcesTakeonaGrowingRole.TheWorldBankPublic-PrivateInfrastructureAdvisoryFacility(PPIAF).

FosterandBriceño-Garmendia.(2010).Africa Infrastructure: A Time for Transformation. Africa Development Forum Series.TheWorldBank.Retrieved19January,2018fromhttps://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2009/01/11487313/africasinfrastructure-time-transformation

GlobalRailwayReview.(2017).Kenya Railway’s Standard Gauge Railway. Kenya Railway’s Standard Gauge Railway.Retrieved5January,2020fromhttps://www.Globalrailwayreview.com/article/61059/kenya-railways-standard-gauge-railway/

Godfrey, S., & Ross, A. (2016). China and Africa: The New Water World. Waterlines, 35(1), 12–17.doi:10.3362/1756-3488.2016.003

Guo,D.(2013).Comparison of Economic Linkages between China and Africa: Applying the WIOD database.UnitedNationsIndustrialDevelopmentOrganization,WorkingPaper.

Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J., & Rozenberg, J. (2019). Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. Sustainable Infrastructure.WorldBank.doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1430-3

Han, X. (2018). Money, Markets and Hydropower: Chinese Dam Construction in Africa, Minerva Access.Ashgate.Retrieved20December,2019fromminerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/208834

Hensengerth,O.(2011).InteractionofChineseInstitutionswithHostGovernmentinDamConstruction:theBuidaminGhana.AcademicPress.

Hirschman,A.(1958).The Strategy of Economic Development.YaleUniversityPress.

Hirschman,A.O.(1969).The Strategy of Economic Development.OxfordPress.

Hirschman,A.O. (1981).Essays in Trespassing: Economic to Politics and Beyond.CambridgeUniversityPressArchive.

IEA.(2014).AfricaEnergyOutlook-AFocusonEnergyProspects inSub-SaharanAfrica.WorldEnergyOutlookSeries,OECD/IEA.

IEA.(2015).WorldEnergyOutlook.OECD/IEA.

Page 28: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

28

IEA.(2019a).Africa Energy Outlook 2019.InternationalEnergyAgency(IEA).Retrieved11January,2020fromwww.fondem.ong/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Africa_Energy_Outlook_2019.pdf

IEA.(2019b).World Energy Outlook 2019.InternationalEnergyAgency(IEA).Retrieved15January,2020fromhttps://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019

IEA&UIC.(2015).Railway Handbook 2015: Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions.OECDInternationalEnergyAgencyandInternationalUnionofRailways.

InfrastructureConsortiumforAfrica(ICA).(2017).Infrastructure Financing Trends in Africa.Retrieved26June,2019fromhttps://www.icafrica.org/fileadmin/documents/Annual_Reports/IFT2017.pdf

InternationalMonetaryFund(IMF).(2014).WorldEconomicOutlook.IMF.

Jesse,G.,&Madden,P.(2019).FiguresoftheWeek:Africa’sinfrastructureneedsareinvestmentopportunity.Brookings.

Kaplinsky,R.,&Morris,M.(2001).A Handbook for Value Chain Research.IDRC.

KenyaChinaEconomicandTradeAssociation.(2017).2017 Chinese Enterprises in Kenya Social Responsibility Report.Retrieved22December2019fromhttp://ke2.mofcom

KenyaNationalBureauofStatistics.(2019).Economic Survey 2019.Retrieved10January,2020fromhttps://www.knbs.or.ke/download/economic-survey-2019/

Kermen,A.,&Lam,K.N.(2014).WorkforceLocalizationamongChineseState-OwnedEnterprises(SOEs)inChina.Journal of Contemporary China.

Kinyondo,Y.J.,&Chatama,G.(2015).ImpactofChina’sCooperation:TheCaseofChineseGaragesinTanzania.Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies,8(1),27–39.

Kirchherr, J., Disselhoff, T., & Charles, K. (2016). Safeguards, Financing, and Employment in ChineseInfrastructureProjectsinAfrica:TheCaseofGhana’sBuiDam.Waterlines,35(1),37–58.

Kopp,Block,&Limi.(2013).Turning the Right Corner: Ensuring Development through a Low-Carbon Transport Sector.WorldBank.

Kou,S.(2018).China is Investing in Africa and that is a Good Thing.BusinessDay.Retrieved9May,2019fromhttps://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2018-12-19-china-is-investing-in-africa-and-thats-a-good-thing/

Krugman,P.(1991).IncreasingReturnsandEconomicGeography.Journal of Political Economy,99,483–499.

Kummritz, V., Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2017). Economic Upgrading through Global Value Chain Participation.PolicyResearchWorkingPaperNo.8007.Washington,DC:WorldBank.

Lee,C.K.(2009).RawEncounter:ChineseManagers,AfricanWorkersandthePoliticsofCasualizationinAfrica’sChineseEnclaves.The China Quarterly,199,647–666.

Lomas,N.(2012).Innovate or Die: Nokia’s Long-Drawn-Out Decline.Techcrunch.RetrievedJuly12,2018fromhttps://techcrunch.com/2012/12/31/nokias-long-drawn-out-decline/

MckinseyGlobalInstitute.(2016).Bridging Global Infrastructure Gaps.CollaborationwithMckinsey’sCapitalProjectsandInfrastructurePractice.Retrieved6May,2018fromhttps://www.un.org/pga/71/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2017/06/Bridging-Global-

Monson,J.(2009).Africa’s Freedom Railway: How a Chinese Development Project Changed Lives and Livelihood in Tanzania.IndianaUniversityPress.

Monson,J.(2013).RememberingWorkontheTazaraRailwayinAfricaandChina,19652011:When“NewMen”GrowOld.African Studies Review,56(1),45–64.

Morlin-Yron,S.(2017).China Funds Railways to Link Across East Africa.Retrieved12January,2018fromhttps://www.cnn.com/2016/11/21/Africa/Chinese-funded-railways-in-africa

Morris & Fessehaie. (2014). The Industrialization Challenge for Africa: Towards a Commodities basedindustrializationpath.Journal of African Trade, 1,25-36.

Page 29: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

29

Moyo,D.(2009).Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa.Farrar,Straus,andGiroux.

Mtegha,H.,Leeuw,P.,Naicker,S.,&Molepo,M.(2012).Resources corridors: Experiences, Economic and Engagement; A Typology of Sub-Saharan African Corridors. School of Mining Engineering and Centre for Sustainability in Mining and Industry (CSMI).UniversityofWitwatersrand.

Mutethya,E.(2018).CRBCSendsThirdBatchofKenyanStudentstoStudyinChina.China Daily.Retrieved25December,2019fromhttp://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201804/21

NewPartnershipforAfrica’sDevelopment(NEPAD).(2015).Infrastructure Development: Within the Context of Africa’s Cooperation with New and Emerging Development Partners. Office of the Special Advisor on Africa.OSAA.

Ngowi,H.P.(2001).CanAfricaIncreaseitsGlobalShareofForeignDirectInvestment(FDI)?West Africa Review,2(2),1–20.

OECD.(2018a).Enhancing Connectivity through Transport Infrastructure: The Role of Official Development Finance and Private Investment, The Development Dimension.OECD.

OECD/IEA.(2014).Africa Energy Outlook: A Focus on Energy Prospects in Sub-Saharan Africa: World Energy Outlook Special Report.OECDPublishing/InternationalEnergyAgency.Retrieved30Decemberfromwww.iea.org/publications/freepublications

Park,S.H. (1989).Linkagesbetween IndustryandServicesand their Implications forUrbanEmploymentGenerationinDevelopingCountries.Journal of Development Economics,30(2),359–379.

Perkins,D.,&Robbins,G.(2011).The Contribution to Local Enterprise Development of Infrastructure for Commodity Extraction projects: Tanzania’s Central Corridor and Mozambique’s Zambezi Valley. MMCPDiscussionPaper9.TheOpenUniversityandUniversityofCapeTown.

Pham,J.P.,AbdoulS.B.,&Boubacar,B.(2018).Chinese Aid and Investment are Good for Africa. Foreign Policy.Retrieved6June,2019fromhttps://foreignpolicy.com/2018

Polenske,K.R.,&Sivitanides,P.(1990).Linkages in the construction sector.TheAnnals.

Sender,J.,&Smith,S.(1986).The Development of Capitalism in Africa.Methuen.

Shapshak, T. (2018). How Mobile Money Continues to Boom in Africa. Forbes. Retrieved 25 June, 2019from https://www.forbes.com/sites/tobyshapshak/2018/11/27/how-mobile-money-continues-to-boom-in-africa/#6fb0880c5c

Sow,M.(2018).Figures of the Week: Africa’s Intra-and Extra-regional Trade.Brookings.Retrievedfrom29March, 2018 from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2018/03/29/figures-of-the-week-africas-intra-and-extra-regional-trade/

Sun,Y.(2017).China and the East Africa Railways: Beyond full Industry Chain Export.Brookings.Retrieved10January,2020fromhttps://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2017/07/06/china-and-the-east-africa-railways-beyond-full-industry-chain-export/

SyAmadou,N.R.(2017).Leveraging African Pension Funds for Financing Infrastructure Development.AfricanGrowthInitiativeatBrookings.

Tang,K.,&Shen,Y.(2019).Do China-Financed Dams in Sub- Saharan Africa Improve the Region’s Social Welfare? A Case Study of the Impacts of Ghana’s Bui Dam.WorkingPaperNo.2019/25.ChinaAfricaResearchInitiative,SchoolofAdvancedInternationalStudies,JohnHopkinsUniversity.

Technology,P.(2019).China Continues to Build Much-Needed Power Capacity in Africa.RetrievedJuly2,2019fromhttps://www.power-technology.com/comment/chinese-investment-in-africa-2019/

TheAfricanCapacityBuildingFoundation.(2016).Infrastructure Development and Financing in Sub-Saharan Africa: Towards a Framework for Capacity Enhancement.OccasionalPaperNo.25.

Timo&McKibbin.(2010).The Economics of Infrastructure in a Globalized World: Issues, Lessons, and Future Challenges.June,BrookingsInstitution.

Page 30: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

30

Todaro,M.P.,&Smith,S.C.(2009).Economic Development(10thed.).Addinson-Wesley.

Tompsett,D.(2018).Africa’sGrowthStory:TheExploitationofaContinent.Vision.Retrievedfromhttps://www.vision.org/fr/exploitation-of-africa-8304

Tregenna,F.(2008).Sectoral Engines of Growth in South Africa: An Analysis of Services and Manufacturing.ResearchPaper/UNU-WIDER,No.2008.98.

UN-Habitat. (2014).The State of African Cities 2014: Re-imagining Sustainable Urban Transitions.UnitedNationsHumanSettlementsProgramme.Retrieved15January,2020 fromhttp://mirror.unhabitat.org/pmss/getElectronicVersion.aspx?nr=

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2008). World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations, and the Infrastructure Challenge.Geneva:UNCTAD.

Wade,S.(2019).What China is Really Up to in Africa?Forbes.Retrieved4October,2019fromhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2019/10/03/what-china-is-really-up-to-in-africa/#686a067f5930

Walker, M., & Jourdan, P. (2003). Resource-based Sustainable Development: An Alternative Approach toIndustrializationinSouthAfrica.Minerals and Energy - Raw Materials Report,18(3),25–43.

WENR.(2019).New Benefactors? How China and India are Influencing Education in Africa. WorldEducationNews+Review(WENR).Retrieved8June,2019fromhttps://wenr.wes.org/2019/04/how-china-and-india-are-influencing-education-in-africa

WorldBank.(1984).The Construction Industry: Issues and Strategies in Developing Countries.TheWorldBank.

WorldBank.(2008).International Development Association Program Document for a Proposed Credit in the Amount of SDR60.8 million (US$100 million equivalent) to the Republic of Ghana for a Sixth Poverty Reduction Support Credit.Author.

WorldBank.(2012).Transformation through Infrastructure.WorldBank.

World Bank (2017a). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution.Washington,DC:WorldBank.

WorldBank.(2017b).Why we need to close the infrastructure gap in Sub-Saharan Africa.Washington,DC:WorldBank.Retrieved12May,2019fromhttps://www.worldbank.org

Wu, T., Gomera, J., & Vaidyanathan, V. (2019). Connectivity and Transport Infrastructure. In China’sInfrastructureDevelopmentinAfrica:AnExaminationofProjectsinTanzaniaandKenya.InstituteofChineseStudies.

Xinhuanet.(2019).Tanzanian FM Hails Bilateral Ties with China.Retrieved10July,2019fromwww.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-04/05/c_137953116.htm

eNDNoTeS

1 DeloitteAfrica,“AfricaConstructionTrends”,2018.Retrieved2May,2019fromwww2.deloitte.com/za/en/pages/energy-and-Resources/articles/africa-construction-trends-report.html

2 Methodsusingmoreavailabledatashowthatforadvancedeconomies,anincreaseinonepercentagepointofGDPininvestmentspendinginadvancedeconomiesraisesthelevelofGDPbyabout0.4percentinthesameyearandby1.5percentfouryearsaftertheincrease.

3 Additionally,closingtheinfrastructuregaprelativetoglobalbestperformerscouldseethegrowtheffectupsurgeGDPpercapitaby2.6percentagepointsperyear.WorldBank(2017).AfricaPulse.Retrieved26 June, 2019 from http://www.worldbank.org/en/region/afri/publication/why-we-need-to-close-the-infrastructure-gap-in-sub-saharan-africa.

4 Rawmaterialsupply.Retrieved29December,2019fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/economics-econometrics-and-finance/raw-material-supply

5 Economiesofscope.Retrieved5January,2020fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/economies-econometrics-and-finance/economies-of-scope

Page 31: Identifying Forward and Backward Linkages From China’s

Journal of Comparative Asian DevelopmentVolume 18 • Issue 1 • January-June 2021

31

6 Agglomerationeffect.Handbookofregionalandurbaneconomies,2015.Retrieved5January,2020fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/economics-econometrics-and-finance/agglomeration-effect

7 PWC.2014.Trends,challengesandfutureoutlook.CapitalprojectsandinfrastructureinEastAfrica,SouthernAfricaandWestAfrica.PWCAfrica.

8 Basel III:Need toknow.Euromoney.Retrieved24January,2020 fromhttps://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kjsv4trtmdl/basel-iii-to-know

9 http://www.nepad.org/regionalintegrationandinfrastructure10 (EAC,Undated)11 https://www.sadc.int/english/regional-integration/is/12 www.comm.ecowas.int/dept/stand.php?id=f_f1_brief&lang=en13 UnitedNationsEconomicCommissionforAfrica14 https://www.afdb.org/en/topics-and-sectors/infrastructure/15 L.Modowo,“ShouldAfricabewaryofChinesedebt?”,BBC,2018.RetrievedJune14,2019fromwww.

bbc.com/news/world-africa-4536809216 Deloitte Africa, “Africa Construction Trends”, 2018, www2.deloitte.com/za/en/pages/energy-and-

resources/articles/africa-construction-trends-report.html.17 LiuHaifang&JamieMonson,“RailwayTime:TechnologyTransferandtheRoleofChineseExpertsin

theHistoryofTazara,”inAfricanEngagements,eds.TonDietz,KjellHavnevik,MaykeKaag,andTerjeOestigaard(Brill,2011),226-251.

18 L.Corkin,C.Burke&M.Davies,“China’sRoleintheDevelopmentofAfrica’sInfrastructure,”WorkingPapers in African Studies, 2008, https://www.sais-jhu.edu/sites/default/files/China’s-Role-in-the-Development-of-Africa’s-Infrastructure.pdf.

19 Kenyanstandard-gaugerailwaynearscompletion.InternationalRailwayJournal,April28,2016.Retrievedfrom: https://www.railjournal.com/index.php/africa/kenyan-standard-gauge-railway-nears-completion.html?channel=

20 China-aidedtrans-Africarailwaylinelikelytotransformregionaltrade.NikkeiAsianReview.Retrieved16January,2019fromhttps://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/China-aided-trans-Africa-railway-line-likely-to-transform-regional-trade

21 Bach(2013)reviewstheoldconceptofpatrimonialisminaninternational,notexclusivelyAfricancontextandpointstothemixedandambivalentnatureofneo-patrimonialism.Inhisviewofneo-patrimonialisminthestateratherthanthepatrimonialstateperse,personalizedpowerrelationsandappropriationofstate resources co-existwith legal-rational anddevelopmentalmodelsofpublicpolicy.Our researchontheSGRfindspreciselyamixtureofsuchprocesses;DanielBach,“Régimespolitiques,pratiquessystémiquesetdynamiquesdel’émergencedanslesétatsafricainsetpost-soviétiques”[PoliticalRegimes,SystemicPracticesandDynamicsofEmergenceinAfricanandPost-SovietStates],Revueinternationaledepolitiquecompare[InternationalReviewofComparativePolitics]20,no.3(2013):153-169;MichaelaWrong,It’sOurTurntoEat:ThestoryofaKenyanwhistleblower(London:FourthEstate,2009).

22 Aprocesswherebyemployeesareemployedincausalandtemporarycapacityinsteadofbeingpermanentstaff.