Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Identify and Avoid theMost Common Prohibited Transactions
Kevin Walsh, Esq.Associate
Groom Law [email protected]
1
Goals for Today
Understand the basic fiduciary provisions of ERISA
Identify “prohibited transactions”
Have a framework for researching and evaluating whether a “prohibited transaction exemption” is available
Understand consequences of non-exempt prohibited transactions
Agenda
ERISA overview
The two types of prohibited transactions
Exemption basics
Tools for analyzing exemptions
Examples of using our exemption analysis framework
Consequences of non-exempt prohibited transactions
Questions
ERISA: Background and Purpose
ERISA became the law of the land in 1974
Balances goals of (1) encouraging employers to offer retirement plans, and (2) ensuring that retirement savers are adequately protected
Makes certain entities and individuals “fiduciaries”
Focus of regulators has shifted somewhat over time
• Originally, fear that plan assets would be mismanaged so defined benefit participants would not receive promised benefit
• More and more, fear that plan participants in defined contribution plans disadvantaged by conflicted advice and hidden costs
ERISA Overview
ERISA’s basic structure: everything is prohibited unless an exemption permits otherwise.
But just because something might be a prohibited transaction doesn’t mean you can’t do it---concept of exemptions.
ERISA’s statutory text describes very broad prohibited transaction rules.
ERISA’s statutory text plus administrative guidance from the Department of Labor sets out exemptive relief.
Prohibited Transaction Overview
ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules apply to:
• Any plan covered by ERISA –including welfare plans
• Plan asset “vehicles”
• Code section 4975 at IRAs and HSAs
Two types of prohibited transactions:
• “Party-in-interest” transactions
• “Self-dealing” transactions
406(a) Prohibited Transactions
• Who is a “party in interest”?
• What can’t a plan do with a party in interest?
• Sale or exchange between a plan and a party in interest
• Any loan or extension of credit between a plan and a party in interest
• Any transfer of assets from the plan
• Use of plan assets by or the benefit of a party in interest
“Party-in-interest” transactions
8
3(14)(A) - Fiduciary:
•Named Fiduciary
•Plan administrator
•Trustee
•Custodian
•Investment Advisor 3(14)(B)
Service Provider
3(14)(G)
Any entity 50%
owned (directly
or indirectly) by a
Fiduciary
Plan
3(14)(F)
Relative
3(14)(F)
Relative
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(G)
Any entity 50%
owned (directly
or indirectly) by a
Service Provider
3(14)(C)
Employer of
employees covered
by the Plan
3(14)(D) UNION
An employee
organization whose
members are
covered by the Plan
A B
CD
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(G)
Any entity 50%
owned (directly
or indirectly) by an
Employer or and (E)
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(F)
Relative
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(E)
50% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(E)
50% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(G) Any entity
50% owned (directly
or indirectly) by an
Employer organization
or an (E)
3(14)(H)
10% owner
(direct or
indirect)
3(14)(H)
Employee
Officer
Director
3(14)(F)
Relative
3(14)(F)
Relative
“PARTY-IN-INTEREST”
STATUS - § 3(14)
Examples of “Party-in-Interest” Transactions
“Party-in-interest” transactions
The plan sells an investment that it owns to
the plan sponsor
The plan sponsor guarantees a loan to a
plan
406(b) Prohibited Transactions
Self-dealing prohibited transactions.
• Discretion over plan assets
• Provider of investment advice
• Discretion over plan administration
Who is a fiduciary?
• Using assets for his or her own interest for his or her own account
• Representing an adverse party in a transaction involving a plan (can’t represent both sides of a transaction)
• Receiving consideration for a personal account from any party dealing with a plan transaction involving plan assets
Fiduciaries are prohibited from:
11
Prohibited Transactions “Real” Conflicts by Fiduciaries
• Self-Dealing
– Fiduciary deals with plan assets “in own interest”
– Intent not relevant
– Example: Plan’s purchase of bond from investment manager’s affiliate even if fair price
– Example: Fiduciary consultant recommends own service or product
• Representing Both Sides
– Fiduciary represents both plan and counterparty in transaction between them
– Example: A trade between two accounts managed by the same manager (or affiliated managers)
• “Kickbacks”
– Fiduciary receives “consideration” from party involved in plan transaction
– Example: Fiduciary consultant receives a commission from insurer in connection with policy recommended by consultant
Examples of Self-DealingProhibited Transactions
Fiduciary-prohibited transactions
A fiduciary hires his son to provide services to a plan
A fiduciary invests in a fund that will pay fees to
an affiliate of the fiduciary
Exemption Basics
What are exemptions?
• Statutory Exemptions
• Administrative Class Exemptions
• Administrative Individual Exemptions
• Other Guidance
Where would I find an exemption?
Statutory Exemptions
Commonly used statutory exemptions
ERISA section 408(b)(2): reasonable
compensation/services
ERISA section 408(b)(8): collective investment
trusts
ERISA section 408(b)(17): transactions with plan
service providers
Administrative Class Exemptions
Commonly used class exemptions
PTEs 77-3 and 77-4: mutual fund exemptions
PTE 84-14: qualified professional asset managers
PTE 91-38 and PTE 90-1: bank collective trusts and insurance
pooled separate accounts
Individual Exemptions
Individual prohibited transaction exemptions
• Exemption needs to be:
• Administratively feasible
• In the interests of the plan, its participants, and beneficiaries
• Protective of the rights of participants and beneficiaries
• Individual exemptions and EXPRO (PTE 96-62)
• A “fast track” procedure to obtain an individual exemption
• However, only available if you can point to “substantially similar” exemptive relief already granted by the DOL
Other Guidance
Non-Exemptions
• Occasionally DOL provides relief through temporary enforcement policies or other guidance
Tools for Analyzing an Exemption
Regulatory Class Exemption Key Questions
Key Questions
Which transactions do
the guidance apply to?
What type of relief does the
exemption provide?
Can I meet the conditions?
Statutory Class Exemption Key Questions
Key Questions
What is the text of the statute?
Has DOL interpreted the
exemption?
Which transactions do
the guidance apply to?
What type of relief does the
exemption provide?
Can I meet the conditions?
Non-Exemption Key Questions
Key Questions
Which transactions do
the guidance apply to?
What type of relief does the
guidance provide?
Can I meet the conditions?
How is this different than an exemption?
Regulatory Example
PTE 77-4, Section II
Which transactions do the exemption
apply to?
• The purchase or sale of an open-ended investment company, the investment adviser for which is also a fiduciary with respect to the plan (or an affiliate of such fiduciary), and is not an employer of employees covered by the plan
PTE 77-4, Section II
What type of relief does the exemption
provide?
• The restrictions of section 406 of the Act and the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall not apply
PTE 77-4, Section II
Can I meet the conditions?
• The Plan does not pay a sales commission in connection with such purchase or sale
• The Plan does not pay a redemption fee unless the redemption fee is only paid to the investment company and the existence of the fee is disclosed in the prospectus at the time of purchase and at the time of the sale
• The Plan does not pay an investment management, investment advisory fee, or similar fee with respect to the plan assets invested in such shares for the entire period of the investment. The investment company is permitted to pay investment advisory fees.
• A second Plan fiduciary, who is independent, receives a current prospectus, full and detailed disclosure of fees charged to or paid by the plan, the reasons why the first fiduciary considers the purchase to be appropriate for the Plan, and any limitations on the first fiduciary with respect to the assets that would be invested in the investment company.
• On the basis of the disclosure, the second fiduciary approves of the fees to be paid by the investment company in writing
• The disclosure and approval is updated should there be a change in fees
Statutory Example with Minimal Guidance
408(b)(8)
What is the text of the statute?
• The prohibitions provided in section 406 shall not apply to ... any transaction between a plan and ... a ... collective trust fund ... maintained by a party in interest which is a bank or trust company supervised by a State or Federal agency ..., if –
• The transaction is a sale or purchase of an interest in the fund,
• The bank, trust company ... receives no more than reasonable compensation, and
• Such transaction is expressly permitted by the instrument under which the plan is maintained, or by a fiduciary (other than the bank [or] trust company ..., or an affiliate thereof) who has authority to manage and control the assets of the plan
408(b)(8)
Has DOL interpreted the
statute?
• In Advisory Opinion 96-15A, DOL interpreted 408(b)(8) to clarify that:
• The exemption provides relief from sections 406(a)(1), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2) for the purchase or sale by a bank or trust company, as fiduciary of ERISA-covered plans, of interests in its funds
408(b)(8)
Which transactions do the exemption
apply to?
• The purchase or sale by a bank or trust company, as fiduciary of ERISA-covered plans, of interests in its funds
408(b)(8)
What type of relief does the exemption
provide?
• Sections 406(a)(1), 406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2)
• Does not cover the receipt of consideration for a personal account from any party dealing with a plan transaction involving plan assets
408(b)(8)
Can I meet the conditions?
• Is it a sale or purchase of an interest in a CIT?
• Am I a bank or trust company?
• Am I receiving no more than reasonable compensation?
• Is the transaction expressly permitted by an instrument of the plan or has it been approved by an independent discretionary fiduciary?
Statutory Example with Formal Regulation
408(b)(2)
What is the text of the statute?
• The prohibitions provided in section 406 shall not apply to ... contracting or making reasonable arrangements with a party in interest for office space, or legal, accounting, or other services necessary for the establishment or operation of the plan, if no more than reasonable compensation is paid therefor
408(b)(2)
Has DOL interpreted the
statute?
• Yes, it has issued a regulation
• DOL’s regulations clarify that acts described in ERISA section 406(b) are “separate transactions” not exempted by ERISA section 408(b)(2)
• The implementing regulations under ERISA section 408(b)(2) provide that a contract will not be a reasonable contract unless the service provider discloses, among other things, all compensation it will receive (directly or indirectly) in connection with its services to the plan
408(b)(2)
Which transactions do the exemption
apply to?
• The payment of fees to and the provision of reasonable and necessary services by a party in interest to a plan pursuant to a contract for reasonable fees
408(b)(2)
What type of relief does the exemption
provide?
•Relief from 406(a)’s “party-in-interest” prohibited transaction provisions
408(b)(2)
Can I meet the conditions?
• Are the services necessary for the establishment or operation of the plan?
• Are the services to be furnished under a contract or arrangement that is reasonable?
• Will no more than reasonable compensation be paid for such services?
• Has all compensation to be received (directly or indirectly) in connection with the services been disclosed in writing to the plan?
Non-Exemption Example
Field Assistance Bulletin 2018-02
Which transactions do the guidance
apply to?
• Transactions that would have been exempted had the Best Interest Contract Exemption and Principal Transactions Exemption not been vacated
Field Assistance Bulletin 2018-02
What type of relief does the guidance
provide?
•The Department will not pursue prohibited transaction claims
Field Assistance Bulletin 2018-02
Can I meet the conditions?
• Would the transaction have been exempt under the Best Interest Contract Exemption or the Principal Transactions Exemption?
• Am I working diligently and in good faith to comply with the impartial conduct standards?
• What are the impartial conduct standards?
• Provide advice that reflects the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and like aims, based on the investment objectives, risk tolerance, financial circumstances, and needs of the retirement investor, without regard to the financial or other interest of the advisor, financial institution or any affiliate, related entity or other party
• Receive no more than reasonable compensation
• Avoid materially misleading statements
Field Assistance Bulletin 2018-02
How is this different than an
exemption?
• Guidance is easier to revoke without notice
• Possibly leaves third-parties able to assert prohibited transaction claims
Consequences
PERSONAL LIABILITY – A fiduciary is liable for: – Losses to plan arising from his or her violation– Profit earned by fiduciary in connection with violation
EXCISE TAXES – Owed to IRS under the Code on prohibited transactions – By counterparty (party in interest) if violation of 406(a)– By fiduciary, if violation of fiduciary conflict rules
CO-FIDUCIARY LIABILITY – A fiduciary may be liable for the actions of another fiduciary if:– It knowingly participates in another fiduciary’s breach– In committing his or her own breach, he or she allows another fiduciary to
commit a breach, or– It has knowledge of a breach by another fiduciary and fails to take reasonable
steps to remedy it
Consequences of Engaging in a Non-Exempt Prohibited Transaction
ERISA section 409 imposes personal liability for breaches of fiduciary responsibilities
Such liability includes personal liability to :
• Make good any losses to the plan
• Restore any profits earned by the fiduciary through the use of plan assets
• Other equitable or remedial relief as a “court may deem appropriate, including removal of such fiduciary”
Prohibited transactions are also required to be reported on Form 5500 (Schedule H), which may result in collateral consequences
Consequences of Engaging in a Non-Exempt Prohibited Transaction
Tax of 15 percent of the “amount involved” per calendar year until correction
Potential tax to 100 percent of the “amount involved” if the prohibited transaction is not corrected
Increased private litigation risk
Enforcement and Litigation
Department of Labor enforcement
• Role in investigations
• Voluntary compliance letters
• Settlement and litigation
Private litigation
• Common claims
• How prohibited transactions play out in litigation
Questions?
Miss the 2018 Spring Virtual Conference?
Go to:https://ecommerce.asppa-net.org/Webcasts-Conferences/Meeting-Details/productId/8935914
Order the On-Demand Recording!Member price: $299
Nonmember price: $349Worth 7.5 CE Credits!
And Save the Date: December 62018 Winter Virtual Conference