Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Theme 2 Urban Infrastructure Services I. What infrastructure services are • Large systems to small components even atom scale • Natural, man-made II. Usage III. Performance issues • Eroding condition • Capacity not always keeping up with demand • Investment IV. Vulnerabilities • Historical location in vulnerable areas, e.g., flood zones,
ecologically sensitive areas, equity issues (affected by facilities and services, underserved)
• Increasing interdependencies V. Collisions with extreme events VI. New innovation to harden/promote infrastructure
IDB Megacities Symposium Professor Rae Zimmerman
Please cite this presentation when using the material elsewhere, and be aware of copyrights in source documents.
I. What They Are: Infrastructure Types - Examples Energy • Off-shore oil rigs • Mines and mills • Refineries • Storage facilities • Tank cars • Power plants • Energy transmission and distribution facilities and lines Water • Reservoirs • Dams • Aqueducts • Water treatment plants • Water supply transmission and distribution pipelines • Storage facilities • Wastewater collection or conveyance systems (sanitary sewers, storm sewers, combined sewers;
pumping stations) • Wastewater treatment plants Transportation • Roadways • Bridges • Rail lines • Airports • Mass transit • Pipelines • Marine transportation: harbors, ports, channels, terminals
IDB Megacities Symposium
II. Usage The Transportation Sector: Modes of Travel
Source: U.S. EPA (2013) Our Built and Natural Environments: A Technical Review of the Interactions among Land Use, Transportation, and
Environmental Quality, Second edition. Washington, D.C.: EPA http://www.epa.gov/dced/pdf/b-and-n/b-and-n-EPA-231K13001.pdf, p. 29
IDB Megacities Symposium
Biking and Walking Trends in Biking Compared to Walking (Trips) and Funding,
U.S., 1990-2009
USDOT, FHWA (May 2010) The National Bicycling and Walking Study: 15-Year Status Report p. 6, 5
http://drusilla.hsrc.unc.edu/cms/downloads/15-year_report.pdf
IDB Megacities Symposium
Source: U.S. Environmental Information Administration (EIA) http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/images/new_flow_chart.png. (Red line added to indicate disruptions during Hurricane Sandy).
The Energy Sector: Supply Chain
IDB Megacities Symposium
The Water Sector: Water Consumption – Type, Use
U.S. EPA (2013) Our Built and Natural Environments: A Technical Review of the Interactions among Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Quality, Second edition. Washington, D.C.: EPA, p. 17, 19, 18. http://www.epa.gov/dced/pdf/b-and-n/b-and-n-EPA-231K13001.pdf
IDB Megacities Symposium
“Tipping Points” or Break Points Leading to Infrastructure Service and User Collisions: Some Examples
• Exponential rise in population, however, the trends vary dramatically by place and time – Average annual percentage change is declining – Population of developing nations is increasing faster
than developed nations – Urban populations are increasing faster than rural
areas • Per capita land consumption is increasing, contributing
to large distances that link production and consumption and reduced capacity of the land to manage water
• Infrastructure usage is increasing often exceeding capacity
IDB Megacities Symposium
Increased Infrastructure Use with Limited Capacity Adjustment: A Summary
• Energy Usage and Production: Based on EIA data, consumption and production increase (particularly in residential, commercial and transportation sectors) with depressions during recession periods (most recently late 2000s); production rates exceed consumption rates (Source: EIA, Monthly Energy Review, 2014, Fig. 1.1 http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/mer.pdf
• Transportation: According to FHWA data, Vehicle Miles of Travel and fuel consumption continue to increase in spite of fuel economy (Source of figure and findings: U.S. DOT, FHWA (April 2013) Highway Statistics 2011). APTA (2013) shows similar increases for public transit.
• Communications: Usage has been increasing exponentially, reflected in cell phone use (Source: CTIA (2014) Annual Wireless Industry Survey for 2013 http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIA_Survey_YE_2012_Graphics-FINAL.pdf
IDB Megacities Symposium
III. Performance: Infrastructure Use, Investment, Condition
Infrastructure usage has continued to grow:
• The U.S. DOT indicates Vehicle Miles of Travel is steadily increases (U.S. DOT[1]);
• The U.S. DOT and APTA indicate transit ridership is similarly increasing (APTA)
• According to EIA, energy production and use steadily increased nationwide.[2]
• CTIA indicates the exponential growth in cellular technologies.[3]
• The Pew Center [4] indicates dramatic increases in information technology usage, i.e., for the internet, computers and cell phones.
These services continue to be marked by poor condition and needing large investment thus diminishing use or usage quality:
Condition 2017: U.S. average is “D+”[5, p. 5]
Age: NYC infrastructure age ranges, according to CUF[6], are: sewer mains and subway facilities (about 80-90 years old) to airport support facilities (40-50 years old); water mains and bridges are in the middle.
Design and environmental issues: However, age may not be the whole story, since many bridge collapses have occurred in newer bridges[7]
Investment: ASCE estimates a $4.59 trillion need to 2025[5, p. 8]
Sources: : [1] U.S. DOT, FHWA Highway Statistics (April 2013) .[2]Center for Urban Future (2015) Caution Ahead, New York, NY: CUF, p. 11; [3] CTIA
(2014) Annual Wireless Industry Survey; [4] Pew Research Center, February 2014, “The Web at 25,” summarized from pp. 4, 11 and 13 Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/27/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s. [5] ASCE (2017) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2017). “2017 report card
for America’s infrastructure,” ASCE, Washington, D.C.; [6] Center for an Urban Future (2014) Caution Ahead. Overdue Investments for New York’s Aging
Infrastructure, New York, NY: CUF; [7]R. Zimmerman, Transport the Environment and Security, 2012. R. Zimmerman NIST presentation October 2016
IDB Megacities Symposium
IV. Infrastructure Vulnerabilities A. Location: e.g., Coasts
Source: R. Zimmerman and C. Faris, “Infrastructure Impacts and Adaptation Challenges,” Chapter 4 in Climate Change Adaptation in
New York City: Building a Risk Management Response, New York City Panel on Climate Change 2010 Report, edited by C.
Rosenzweig and W. Solecki. Prepared for use by the New York City Climate Change Adaptation Task Force. Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1196. New York, NY, NY Academy of Sciences, 2010, pp. 63-85. Pp. 68, 69, 73. CSO figures drawn from
NYCPlaNYC.
NYC Power Plants NYC Combined Sewer Outfalls
IDB Megacities Symposium
Vulnerabilities B. Increasing Interconnections
Dependencies and Interdependencies
Definitions [1] • A dependency is activity in one direction: a flow of people,
information, commodities from one point to another • An interdependency is a flow of at least two ways Types of interdependencies Interdependencies can occur in a number of different forms [1]: • Functional • Spatial (proximity) • Cyber • Logical
IDB Megacities Symposium
Source: [1] Rinaldi, S., Peerenboom, J., and Kelly, T. (2001). “Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies.” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11-25.
Interconnectivity: Centered on Energy
Source: U.S. DHS (2015) Sector Specific Plan for Energy, p. 19 https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/nipp-ssp-energy-2015-508.pdf
Source: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration
(September 2012) Annual Energy Review 2011, Washington, DC: U.S. EIA,
Figure 2.0, p. 37, http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/aer.pdf
IDB Megacities Symposium
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/flow/total_energy.pdf
Intra-Transit Multi-Modal Interconnections: Bus Connections at Subway Stations, NYC
Source: R. Zimmerman, C.E. Restrepo, J. Sellers, A. Amirapu, and Theodore R. Pearson (2014) “Promoting Transportation Flexibility in Extreme Events
through Multi-Modal Connectivity,” U.S. Department of Transportation Region II Urban Transportation Research Center, New York, NY: NYU-Wagner, June.
Final report available at: http://www.utrc2.org/sites/default/files/pubs/Final-NYU-Extreme-Events-Research-Report.pdf
Connectivity of Subway
Stations and Buses
Stopping
Connectivity is
important for flexible,
multi-modal
connections, greater
access to transit, and
evacuation
Number and distances
of buses are defined
within a 0.1 mile radius
of each subway station
IDB Megacities Symposium
Interdependencies under Normal (non-disruptive) Conditions
TRANSPORTATION WATER MANAGEMENT
Roads • Signals • Lighting
Rail track) • Signals • Switches • Lighting
Water Conveyance • Drainage Structures • Catch Basins • Culverts • Sewers
Transportation supports distribution and storage structures for water infrastructure via co-location (geographic dependence)
Water management infrastructure provides water reduction services for transportation to prevent flooding (functional dependence)
ENERGY
Dependence on energy
Transportation for water management Catch basin cleaning
Transportation for water management Catch basins and roads
IDB Megacities Symposium
Source: Developed by Professor Rae Zimmerman
Road Congestion from Trucks and Passenger Vehicles: 2040
Source: U.S. DOT (2013) Freight Facts and Figures 2012, pp. 40, 41 http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/nat_freight_stats/docs/13factsfigures/pdfs/fff2013.pdf
IDB Megacities Symposium
V. Collisions of Infrastructure with Extreme Events
Source: NOAA (2006) NOAA Celebrates 200 years
NOAA (2013) Service Assessment, Hurricane/Post Tropical Cyclone Sandy, Cover page
NOAA (2016) Service Assessment The Historic SC Floods of Oct 1-5, 2015, Photos by NWS Weather Forecast Offices
and USGS, pp. 15, 22.
General Source: R. Zimmerman NIST presentation October 2016
Collisions: Infrastructure Interdependencies and Accidents - Electric Power and Transit Interconnections
• 2003 northeast U.S. and Canada blackout: Transit rail (electrified) took about 1.3 times and traffic signals 2.6 times as long to be restored relative to electric power restoration.*
• The Metro-North railway outage: Large power line impairment lasted over a week.**
• September 29, 2011 Lightening Strike on a LIRR Computer:*** Highly centralized network (most trains go through Jamaica station), high volume of traffic (81 million annually), few rail alternative; Multiple failures at the same time increased consequences dramatically - lightening strike disables trains west of Jamaica, programming error, third rail shut, 17 stranded trains, 9 standing trains. Opportunities for Intervention: More communication, computer training, securing facilities from natural hazards, travel alternatives
• Transformer explosions impairing transit: July 29, 2001 (NYC); power outages caused closures of San Francisco Bay Area and Chicago transit lines.****
• December 19, 2009: Eurostar trains were halted between London, Paris and Brussels from an electrical problem brought about by a water problem due to temperature differentials
Sources: *R. Zimmerman and C. E. Restrepo (2006) “The Next Step: Quantifying Infrastructure Interdependencies to Improve Security,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Vol. 2, Nos. 2/3, pp. 215-230; p. 223. **Matt Flegenheimer (September 25, 2013) Power Failure Disrupts Metro North’s New Haven Line; May Last Days, New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/26/nyregion/metro-norths-new-haven-line-suspended-after-power-loss.html ***Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) (October 2011), ‘Preliminary review September 29, 2011 lightning strike at Jamaica’, New York, NY, USA: MTA. ****Summarized and references contained in R. Zimmerman (2005) “Mass Transit Infrastructure and Urban Health,” J. of Urban
Health, 82(1), pp. 21-32; pp.27-28.
IDB Megacities Symposium
Collisions: Infrastructure Interdependencies and Extremes: Electric Power and Transit Interdependencies,
Post-Hurricane Sandy Transit and Electric Power
• Electric power was required to power trains and remove water from rail infrastructure, e.g.tunnels.
• Two weeks after Hurricane Sandy, about 80% of the transit lines were fully recovered and others were partially recovered along their routes.
• In 2012 after Hurricane Sandy compared to a similar period in 2011, system ridership declined on average about 14 %.
Source: R. Zimmerman, RAPID/Collaborative Research: Collection of Perishable Hurricane Sandy Data on Weather-Related Damage to Urban Power and Transit Infrastructure,” National Science Foundation, the U. of Washington (lead), Louisiana State University, and New York University; R. Zimmerman (2014), “Planning Restoration of Vital Infrastructure Services Following Hurricane Sandy: Lessons Learned for Energy and Transportation,” J. of Extreme Events, Vol. 1, No. 1.
U. S. Department of Energy (2013) Comparing the Impacts of Northeast Hurricanes on Energy Infrastructure. [Online], p. 11, 12 Available from: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/04/f0/Northeast%20Storm%20Comparison_FINAL_041513c.pdf
Electric power recovery followed similar recovery patterns.
Transit required electric power to function (third rail, signals and switches; energy required robust transit infrastructure for physical support and to transport workers to repair sites.
IDB Megacities Symposium
Collisions: Human Activity, Infrastructure and Extreme Events: Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Source
Source: U.S. EPA (April 14, 2017) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 – 2015. Washington, D.C.: U.S. EPA, p. ES-28. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-2/documents/2017_complete_report.pdf
IDB Megacities Symposium
VI. New Innovations: Summary of Traditional and Innovative Consequence-Reduction Measures
Traditional Measures
• Barricade: Temporary and Permanent, intermittent operation
• Remove or relocate
• Elevate
• Bury
• Change materials and design to reduce exposure and consequences
Innovations
• Invoke mobile resource networks, e.g., “mutual assistance”
• Expand the use of alternative travel routes
• Provide alternative, distributed resources
• Fortify / strengthen (water and physical damage resistance) through
natural processes, e.g., green infrastructures
• Use alternative, decentralized modes of travel
• Increase Interconnection among systems
• Move people, change land use, change behavior
IDB Megacities Symposium
A Synopsis: The Past and the Future . . . • Problems We Have Faced and Are Facing:
– Increasing population growth and infrastructure location in sensitive areas
– Increasing consumption of natural resources often exceeding supplies and the capacity to sustain them
– Increasing natural hazards and climate changes often targeting population and population service locations
• Some Solutions and New Directions:
– Environmental quality is improving in some areas with the introduction of innovative adaptive arrangements
– Renewable resources in infrastructure sectors are taking off
– Use of public transit and alternative vehicles, water recycling and energy conservation is increasing
– Funding is beginning to support new initiatives
IDB Megacities Symposium