Upload
tosca
View
36
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Humor in the philosophy classroom: When is it pedagogically useful and when is it destructive?. 2010 AAPT Workshop-Conference Coastal Carolina University July 31, 2010 Dennis Earl ( [email protected] ) Nils Rauhut ( [email protected] ). Our plan here. Presentation (15-20 min.) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Humor in the philosophy classroom:When is it pedagogically useful and when is it destructive?
2010 AAPT Workshop-Conference
Coastal Carolina University
July 31, 2010
Dennis Earl ([email protected])
Nils Rauhut ([email protected])
Our plan here
Presentation (15-20 min.) Why are we interested in humor and teaching? The use of humor in Plato (Rauhut) Review of empirical studies of the use of humor in the
classroom (Earl)
Group work (30-35 min.) What types or examples of humor have “worked” for you in
philosophy classes? Why was that? What hasn’t? Why was that?
Debriefing/conclusions (5-10 min.) What maxims can we take away from this, if any?
The function of humor in Plato
In Plato there seems to be a strong connection between philosophy and humor
Helping the interlocutor: the example of Hippias Major: “Beauty is a beautiful girl” Socrates response: “That’s a brilliant answer!”
Showing multiple levels of complexity: the example of the Myth of Er in Republic X
Humanizing Philosophy: The example of Alcibiades in the Symposium.
Review of empirical studies of the use of humor in the classroom
What kind of experiments and research are we talking about here?
Is humor connected with student learning? Possible benefits of using humor Kinds of humor to consider Appropriate vs. inappropriate uses of humor
Possible benefits of using humor in the classroom1
reduced anxiety, tension, and stress reduced boredom increased comprehension increased interest increased motivation increased/better communication increased satisfaction with learning promotion of cognitive activity better performance on tests/exams
1. Berk 1996; 71, 73; also Garner 2006; Wanzer et al. 2006
How can humor undermine student learning? One answer: By being perceived as inappropriate
What is perceived as appropriate and what’s not? (Wanzer et al. 2006; categories generated from student responses):
Categories of appropriate humor: humor related to course material humor unrelated to course material self-disparaging humor unintentional humor
Categories of inappropriate humor: disparaging humor: targeting students (as a group or
individually) disparaging humor: targeting others offensive humor self-disparaging humor
Discussion
What counts as success in using humor in (philosophy) teaching?
What types or examples of humor have been successful for you in philosophy classes? Why was that?
What hasn’t? Why was that? What maxims about using humor can we take away from
all of this?
Discussion
What counts as success in using humor in (philosophy) teaching?
What types or examples of humor have been successful for you in philosophy classes? Why was that?
What hasn’t? Why was that? What maxims about using humor can we take away from
all of this?
Two principles for using humor effectively
If a humorous device is likely to improve student learning, consider using it.
If a humorous device is likely to undermine student learning, don’t use it.
Question: How does (or might) humor improve student learning?