Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HRO Today Forum EMEA 2016
8-10 November, 2016 SHERATON GRAND HOTEL & SPA
Edinburgh, Scotland
Workplace innovation:
the contribution of employees
and HR
Maura Sheehan and Peter Reilly
Edinburgh Napier University
Menu for today • A model of innovation
• Drivers of innovation
• Organisational initiatives
• Enablers of workforce innovation
• Barriers to workforce innovation
• Challenges to developing innovation
• Role of HR
CIPD’s model of HRM and innovation
Inputs
Human Capital
Innovative forms of
organising Social Capital
Organisational Capital
Processes
Innovative services
Creative output
Outputs
HR policies
and practices
Context: climate, trust , culture
Drivers of workforce innovation • Tougher & more difficult competition – increasingly globalized markets & now (for UK) post-Brexit challenges
• Innovation at all points in the supply chain – enhanced by access to global markets & knowledge sharing
• Continual pressure to reduce costs driven by access to global markets
• Shorter innovation cycles – technologically & knowledge driven
• Customised solutions for customers and more integrated solutions
• Importance of managerial leadership – esp transformational leadership to encourage employees to take risks, creating a culture tolerating ‘failure’
• Leaders enhance internal and external knowledge sharing & creation; and sustain a knowledge sharing climate in organisations to enhance innovation
What are organisations doing to stimulate
workforce innovation?
Culture change constructive challenge, collaboration, accountability, customer centricity
Greater organisational efficiency
speeding up activities, simplifying processes,
more agility
Diverse people, better deployed and
directed
More joined up extended thinking
internal reorganisation, co-location, faster learning
external partnerships Knowledge sharing
Enablers of
workforce
innovation
FOCUS and DIRECTION
TRUST and RESPONSIBILITY
WORKFORCE REFRESHMENT
IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT
CHALLENGING/ INSPIRING
BENCHMARKING
VIRAL CULTURE CHANGE
LEADERSHIP
Barriers to
workforce
innovation MANAGERS
STIFLING IDEAS
INFORMAL PROCESSES
SILOED ACTIVITIES
KILLING OFF IDEAS TOO
QUICKLY
INSULAR LEADERSHIP
POOR PRIORITISATION
OF IDEAS
PEOPLE NOT SEEN AS
INNOVATION SOURCE
INNOVATION LOW BUSINESS
PRIORITY
V
NEGATIVE THINKING
Challenges and tensions • Managing the paradoxes between objectives (not always aligned)
• Getting task and spatial boundaries right:
• All in one location – risk of group think v More dispersed – wider inputs but fragmented
• Overly directed work – too little space to think v Too autonomous – risk of hobbyism
• Respecting tradition but not being hidebound by it
• Scaleability and replicability are important in large firms but can deter new thinking
• Overcoming tendency to see solutions in structures & processes, not culture & leadership
• Culture change is a resource and time intensive activity – not done quickly
• Greater staff self-governance feels ‘scary’ to those in senior positions
• Fear that overly driven innovators will not get the commercial:values balance right
HR’s role
HR delivers efficiency in own area
HR delivers fresh resources to new spec
HR helps structural reorganisation
HR as prop and cop HR as strategic contributor
HR encourages & facilitates cultural change
HR leads & helps to develop new leadership behaviours
HR introduces new training suite and methods
HR’s own governance approach reflects new culture
HR attunes policies/practices to innovation strategy
And how do HR policies and practices help? Performance Management
Reward Employee engagement
Talent management Job design Learning and development
Case study 1
Tension: consistency v adaptation to suit local needs.
Different views on focussing on best, power of PRP.
Limited role as high engagement already. Coms more important.
Critical to success especially new recruits.
Traditionally a control & delivery mechanism. Line owned.
Taking time to shift towards behavioural from technical training
Case study 2
Not core but can assist: standard expected behaviour but adaptation. Quality manager/ staff conversations, encouraging innovative actions
Not central driver as views differ over power to alter behaviours. ‘How’ job done now assessed but not equal to ‘what’. Recognition may be more significant
Seen seen as a means to achieve a happy and healthy workforce, and to win hearts and minds.
Now looking beyond technical capability to communication, relationships, values -‘people who are right for the culture’.
No connection made to innovation though signs of greater autonomy allowed.
AI, action learning & story telling used to modify behaviour. L&D conveys the intended culture, helps adaptability & build skills
Case study 3
Innovation targets. Now more flexible/ collaborative, incl team based. Staff dialogue supported.
Company very responsive to disengagement signals incl lack of engagement.
Technical skills prized over behavioural. Cultural goals reflected in talent/ leadership sought.
Focus on management of risk and innovation.
Issues arising
• Can HR play a more active role in innovation?
• Is so, how best to do it?
• Need for OD, HR and L&D to provide seamless
contribution. Is that achievable?
• How can desired cultural change be sustained
(when things get difficult)?
Further reading
Sheehan, M. (2016), ‘Leadership Style & Behaviours, Employee Knowledge Sharing & and Innovation Probability’, in: Shipton, H.; Budhwar, P.; Sparrow, P.; Bimrose, J. (eds.). Human Resource Management, Innovation and Performance. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan. Reilly P (2015) ‘Managing across borders and cultures’, Strategic HR Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Vol. 14 Iss: 1/2, pp.36 - 41, May