Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Confidential & Proprietary
How to use Asset Sustainability &
Long Term Planning to get the Funding
you need
Jeff Johnson Vice President, Ameresco
Asset Sustainability
Confidential & Proprietaryameresco.com
• Commercial real estate for 27 years
• Work experience with Air Force, outsourced providers (JLL), investors (LIM) and Corporate (IMS Health)
• Have worked for over 30 Corporate clients (BoA, Citi, AT&T,
Coke, BellSouth, Brown-Forman, Duke Energy, CalPERS, Deutsche Bank, McDonalds, New York Life, Capital One, Deutsche Bank, McDonalds, New York Life, Capital One)
• Experience with portfolio strategy and optimization, consulting, freehold acquisition & disposition, lease transactions; lease administration, project management and facilities management
• B.S. Civil Engineering USAF Academy ‘89
Introduction and background
Confidential & Proprietaryameresco.com
I. Positively enhance your Real Estate and its impact on
“Quality of Teaching & Learning”
II. Turn a static (tactical) capital plan into a dynamic
(strategic) process
III. Enhance your business case process and increase your
chances for success
Strategic Outcomes for Today
Capital Planning
Challenges
Confidential & Proprietary
Capital (Asset) Planning is:
• Difficult & hard to quantify• Difficult to accomplish
• Difficult to prove value
• Hard to prove out accomplishments
• Benchmarks, past experience used as
relevant
• Can be very subjective, relies on expert
opinion
• Tools to accomplish are primitive
• Typically never get all the funding you
really need• Operations team swing into action to
accomplish heroic repairs on assets
which should have been replaced
A show of hands
Confidential & Proprietary
Capital Planning Best Practice:
Using a Benchmark or
2%-4% of Replacement Cost
• Example:
Higher Education Portfolio: 88 buildings, 3.5 msf
Replacement Cost of Portfolio: $605,500,000
• Annual Capital* Request:
$12,110,000/yr - $24,220,000/yr($172/SF x 3.5msf x 2% - 4%)
*Capital Renewal not Capital Investment
Common Benchmarks for infrastructure renewal
A show of hands
The “Spreadsheet”
Con’s• Static picture• Can be subjective• Single year view• Lack of depth results in risk tactics being used
Pro’s• Higher confidence level on condition of
component• Lower effort and cost than conditions based
survey
Con’s • Static picture• Costly to implement• Single year view• Takes a lot of time to implement• Hard to quantify and roll up the “so what?”
Conditions Based Survey“Muster the troops”
Pro’s • Quick & Easy to accomplish and understand• Lower effort and cost than conditions based survey
Asset Planner
Pro’s • Dynamic picture• Faster, Cheaper than Condition based surveying• Enables Condition based survey set-up at a
fraction of cost and time• Executive ready business case output• Lead with engineer based analytics and
experience• Multi-year view
7
Confidential & Proprietaryameresco.com
Spectrum of approaches
Confidential & Proprietary
Balancing act – Competing demands
Copyright 2012
Capital budgets constrained /
Growing deferred maintenance
Operating costs continue to grow
Changing functional demands
On-going building deterioration
Energy Goals
Programming demands to
attract and maintain students
Confidential & Proprietary
Managing Risk
“Deferred maintenance is the practice of postponing maintenance activities.
Generally, a policy of continued deferred maintenance may result in higher costs, asset failure,
and in some cases, health and safety implications. Wikipedia”
Deferred Maintenance is everywhere
Deferred Maintenance is a cycle
Deferred Maintenance is a RISK to your organization
Deferred Maintenance results in premature life cycle
expiration, creating more costly repairs to address
failure, and increasing exposure to risk.
$1 deferred becomes $4 of maintenance over time**Rick Biedenweg, former AVP of information resources at Stanford university
Yet, Deferred Maintenance is a Best Practice
Confidential & Proprietary
Asset Planning (2.0)(Next Generation Stuff…)
Confidential & Proprietary
Predictive Life-Cycle Forecasting
PredictiveLife-Cycleforecasting
• Real Estate (buildings) and it’s infrastructure (components) are
engineering based solutions that have engineering principals
associated with how they behave and/or last = life-cycles
• Those behaviors are influenced by maintenance practices and
environmental conditions = life-cycle modification
• If you understand those implications you can predict when life-cycle
failures should happen = predictive life-cycle forecasting
EXAMPLE DATABASE: 3.2bsf, 66,000 facilities, tracking for 27 years
Confidential & Proprietary
Move from Static to Dynamic Planning
The “Spreadsheet”
Conditions Based Survey“Muster the troops”
PredictiveLife-Cycleforecasting
Average, Typical Building Uniformat II Categories
Components
ASHRE
(HVAC
Only)
BOMAHUD
GPNA
Fanne
Mae
D3022 Hot Water Boilers 25 30 25 30
D3023 Furnaces 18 18 20 20
D3031 Chillers 20 21 20 15
D3034 Packaged Air Conditioning Units 15 25 15 15
D3041 Air Distribution Systems 27 30 35 30
D3045 Exhaust Ventilation Systems 20 19 20 13
D3051 Terminal Self-Contained Units 10 15 15 15
D3053 Unit Heaters 13 14 25 20
D3054 Fan Coil Units 20 20 30 25
D3055 Fin Tube Radiation 25 25 50 30
D3057 Radiant Heater Units 25 25 50 30
D3058 Package Units 15 15 15 15
D3058-D Make-up Air AHU 15 25 15 15
D3060 Controls And Instrumentation 15 18 18 30
D3098 Electric Baseboard Heat 10 10 30 25
Useful Life Resources (Years)
STATIC DYNAMIC
Confidential & Proprietary
Move from Tactical to Strategic Planning
The “Spreadsheet”
PredictiveLife-Cycleforecasting
TACTICAL STRATEGIC
Confidential & Proprietary
• Increase current funding
• Short-term operational savings
• Long-term savings strategies
• Redevelopment strategies, …
Establish
Targets
Identify
Solutions
Execute• Funding sources
• Annual budgets
• Projects (budget/schedule/quality)
• Accountability / Transparency
• Deferred maintenance (DM)
• Facility Condition Index (FCI)
• Unfunded Liability (UL)
• Energy Use / Carbon FootprintNEEDS
STRATEGIES
& SOLUTIONS
IMPLEMENTATION
Asset Planning Process
Copyright 2012
Decision Development Framework
Capital Creation Strategies
Confidential & Proprietary
Physical Asset Criteria
• Building Condition Needs
• Unfunded Liability
• FCI
Utilization Criteria
•Facility utilization
•Enrollment Forecasting
•Space use
•Own vs. lease
Real Estate Criteria
•Asset Valuation
•Land Valuation
Environmental
Criteria
•Carbon Footprint
•Energy Conservation
•Renewable Solutions
Financial Criteria
•Capital Costs
•Operating Costs
•Capital Creation Strategies
•Incentives
Tools
Processes
&
Policies
Decision Development Framework
• Asset Planning Dashboards
• Maintenance & Service Management
• Energy use and optimization
• Finance, Accounting, etc
Accomplish “True” integration of data and decisions
17
Confidential & Proprietaryameresco.com
Confidential & Proprietary
Case Study Example
18
• Project from 2011
• 46 Buildings including admin, teaching, dorm, lab, research,
maintenance and fleet garages
• 1.6 million square feet
Challenges: • No Sustainable Asset Management Plan
• Capital Budget requests based on last year
• Unknown funding needs
• Assets in various states
• Local talented students studying elsewhere
• Programming challenges
Confidential & Proprietary
Unique Data Development : Best Practices
✓ Quickly establish Life Cycle cost profiles for all assets utilizing data
modeling techniques
✓ Consistency and Standardization
DATA VALIDATION
▪ Incorporation of
existing Data
Sources
▪ Staff Interviews
▪ Targeted On-site
Validation
Life Cycle
Forecast for
each Asset
Validation of
Asset Templates:
Data Development Process
Confidential & Proprietary Copyright 2012
MODEL
Life Cycle
Cost
“Templates”
Basic Asset
Details:
▪ Age
▪ Size
▪ Number of
Floors
▪ Use / Type
of Asset
Confidential & Proprietary
Projected Capital Needs
Anticipated Funding Level
Confidential & Proprietary
Projected Total Liability
Unfunded Liability
$2M / Yr
Projected Unfunded Liability
Asset Sustainability Target
$3M / Yr
22
Confidential & Proprietaryameresco.com
Confidential & Proprietary
▪ Industry Standard Index Used to Track Condition
Performance of Facilities / Portfolios
FCI =Renewal and Repair Costs
Replacement Cost
GOOD Range: FCI (0% - 5%)
FAIR Range: FCI (5% - 10%)
POOR Range: FCI (10%-30%)
CRITICAL Range: FCI (> 30%)
Sustainability TargetSustainability Target
Asset Sustainability Target = Facility Condition Index (FCI)
Confidential & Proprietary
Projected Facility Condition Index
Copyright 2011
Critical FCI
Poor FCI
Sustainability Target
Confidential & Proprietary
Projected Funding Target
Copyright 2011
Critical FCI
Poor FCI
Sustainability Target
Confidential & Proprietary
FCI (Current Year)
FCI (Year 5)
FCI (Year 10)
FCI (Year 15)
FCI (Year 20)
FCI (Year 25)
0.0% 10.0% 9.7% 29.0% 49.3% 54.1%
0.3% 7.4% 13.5% 19.9% 48.0% 51.2%
17.5% 31.6% 42.0% 50.9% 53.5% 55.4%
4.5% 8.5% 22.0% 33.8% 45.8% 49.4%
5.3% 5.0% 15.4% 37.1% 42.9% 48.2%
0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 6.3% 9.5% 30.5%
2.9% 7.0% 25.2% 37.0% 42.1% 46.0%
20.6% 29.5% 34.2% 44.5% 64.1% 68.1%
6.6% 14.4% 24.7% 25.6% 44.1% 55.5%
7.0% 8.0% 24.4% 30.6% 38.5% 55.9%
26.1% 30.9% 37.4% 42.8% 47.9% 49.9%
0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 17.9% 33.6% 40.6%
Building A
Building B
Building C
Building D
Building E
Building F
Building G
Building H
Building I
Building J
Building K
Building L
Life Cycle Impact over Time
Confidential & Proprietary
Asset Optimization
Confidential & Proprietary Copyright 2012
STRATEGIES
& SOLUTIONS
IMPLEMENTATION
✓ Quantify Needs (Ops/Cap)
✓ 5 & 30 Year Capital Plan
✓ Dynamic Data Management
✓ Capital Leveraging
✓ Energy & Renewable Solutions
✓ Redevelopment Strategies
✓ Efficient Design
✓ Streamlined Tendering
✓ Construction Management
✓ Affordable Construction
✓ Green Technology
NEEDS
Confidential & Proprietary
Establish Renewal “Reduction” Strategies to Reduce Risk
and Capital Renewal Liabilities
▪ Establish strategies that reduce renewal liability
▪ Present full range of fully leveraged & bundled solutions
combining capital creation strategies with operational savings
▪ Create effective business plan
▪ Develop communication plan
Strategies / Solutions
Copyright 2012
Confidential & Proprietary
✓ Energy Conservation
✓ Deep Retrofits
✓ Renewable Solutions
✓ Maintenance Optimization
✓ Real Estate Strategies
✓ Redevelopment Strategies:
▪ New Infrastructure
▪ Existing Infrastructure
Leveraged and Bundled Capital Creation StrategiesTM:
Real Estate
Strategies
Maintenance
Optimization
Renewable
Solutions
Energy
Conservation
Redevelopment
Strategies
Optimized
Capital
Creation
Strategies
Capital Creation Strategies
Confidential & Proprietary
Projected Unfunded Liability
Unfunded
Liability
Sustainability Target
$2M / Yr
$3.6 M/Yr
Confidential & Proprietary
Capital Creation Strategy
Reduced
Unfunded
Liability
Short Term Energy Savings
Sustainability Target
Confidential & Proprietary
Reduced
Unfunded
Liability
Maintenance and Operating Savings
Capital Creation Strategy
Sustainability Target
Confidential & ProprietaryCopyright 2011
Reduced
Unfunded
Liability
Longer Term Savings – Deep Retrofits / Renewable Solutions
Capital Creation Strategy
Sustainability Target
Confidential & ProprietaryCopyright 2011
Reduced
Unfunded
Liability
Sustainability Target
Real Estate & Community PartnershipStrategies
Capital Creation Strategy
Confidential & ProprietaryConfidential & Proprietary Copyright 2011
Extended Life = 16 Years
FCI Reduction Strategy
5%
10%
30%
Confidential & Proprietary
Asset Optimization
Confidential & Proprietary Copyright 2012
STRATEGIES
& SOLUTIONS
IMPLEMENTATION
✓ Quantify Needs (Ops/Cap)
✓ 5 & 30 Year Capital Plan
✓ Dynamic Data Management
✓ Capital Leveraging
✓ Energy & Renewable Solutions
✓ Redevelopment Strategies
✓ Efficient Design
✓ Streamlined Tendering
✓ Construction Management
✓ Affordable Construction
✓ Green Technology
NEEDS
Confidential & Proprietaryameresco.com
I. Positively enhance your Real Estate and its impact on
“Quality of Teaching & Learning”
II. Turn a static (tactical) capital plan into a dynamic
(strategic) process
III. Enhance your business case process and increase your
chances for success
Strategic Outcomes for Today
Confidential & Proprietary
Thank You!
Jeff Johnson
Ameresco
704-747-7792