Upload
pegeen
View
24
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Housekeeping. Sign in with time. Only sign out as you leave. Cell phones easy to grab and silent Pick up your materials and put them in a folder. More……. Reply to Emails to let us know that you are receiving them. Honor each others suggestions. 45 second Rule No Side bars. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Housekeeping
Sign in with time.
Only sign out as you leave.
Cell phones easy to grab and silent
Pick up your materials and put them in a folder
More……Reply to Emails to let us know that you
are receiving them.
Honor each others suggestions.
45 second Rule
No Side bars
EDSP
Prepared by KATC (2010)
CULTURE OF AUTISM
SOCIAL RELATEDNESS
JOINT ATTENTION & RECEPROCITY
COMMUNICATION
•Expressive deficits•Problems with intent as well as means•Receptive deficits•Problems with meaning and processing
SENSORY PROCESSING
Integration and modulation of inputs
DIFFICULTY WITH CHANGE
Limited interests, repetitive behavior, rigidity
COGNITIVE STYLE•Organization •Sequencing & planning•attention & relevance•abstraction & generalization
The Nuts and Bolts “2-Term Contingency”
Behavior is controlled by it’s consequences
For exampleJohnny hits because he gets attention for it, not
because he is angryMary flaps her hands because it feels good, not
because she has autism
Prepared by KATC January 2010
Behavior Intervention & ASDIf mechanisms for behavior change are
applicable across individuals despite their unique characteristics (e.g., autism, learning
disabilities, mental retardation)
What is special about ASD?
Prepared by KATC (2010)
The Nuts and Bolts Behavior doesn’t happen in a vacuum
“ The 3- term contingency”Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence
Antecedent- Billy falls downBehavior- Billy Cries
Consequence- Billy is held by the teacher
Prepared by KATC January 2010
The Nuts and Bolts Antecedent
Behavior Consequence
Teacher hands Student a new worksheet
Student slides out of desk onto floor
Teacher talks to Student about his behavior for 2 minutes
Teacher works independently for 10 min.
Student blurts out Teacher increases proximity to the student
Teacher says “ Computer time is over, time for math”
Student runs to the hall
Teacher puts student in Time out
Prepared by KATC January 2010
A Closer LookHow do consequences effect problem
behavior?
Reinforcement&
Punishment
Prepared by KATC January 2010
EBP Inventory
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedents
If behavior is primarily maintained by its consequences why do we have to care
about what happens before the behavior?
Prepared by KATC January 2010
Behavior Intervention It is important to consider that for many
individuals with ASD, problem behavior is a result of a lack of knowledge of “what to do”
to most effectively access reinforcement.
What types of things do we attempt to access in our daily lives?
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Behavior InterventionThis module will place a heavy emphasis on
reinforcement-based interventions
Recognition of behavior as communication and then teaching the “what to do”
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Preference-assessmentAny effective behavior change program starts with the identification of possible reinforcers
Sometimes interventionists may take the view that a student did not respond to the delivered reinforcer, it might be more
beneficial to take the alternative view that the interventionist may have failed to identify
an effective reinforcer.
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Getting Started: Review
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent InterventionsProduce change through the arrangement of
antecedent events to get the student in contact with reinforcement for desirable
behavior
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent InterventionsSetting clear behavioral expectations for all
students
Consider the individualized needs of learners when delivering expectations
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
(Cooper et al., 2007)
Antecedent Intervention
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Antecedent InterventionIncreasing the effectiveness of NCR
Conduct a FBA to determinereinforcers maintaining problem behavior
Identify powerful reinforcers
Prepared by KATC (2010)
(Cooper et al., 2007)
Antecedent InterventionIncreasing the effectiveness of NCR
Combine with extinction procedures
Withhold reinforcement briefly if interval ends at the same time as a problem occurs
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Consequent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Consequent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Consequent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Consequent InterventionsUsing extinction effectively
Withhold all reinforcers for the problem behavior
Be consistentConsider using instructions
(Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Consequent InterventionsUsing extinction effectively
Prepare for the the burst.
Increase the number of opportunities to use extinction
Do not use for extreme behaviors(Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Consequent Interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential ReinforcementReinforcement is delivered contingent on the
occurrence of a behavior other than the problem behavior or the behavior occurring at
a reduced rate&
Withholding reinforcement as much as possible for the problem behavior
(Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential ReinforcementReinforcement is delivered contingent on the
occurrence of a behavior other than the problem behavior or the behavior occurring at
a reduced rate&
Withholding reinforcement as much as possible for the problem behavior
(Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential ReinforcementUsing DRA/DRI effectively
Selecting Behaviors to be Reinforced that:
-Exist in the learner’s repertoire
-Require equal or less effort than the problem behavior
-Occur at a rate that will provide sufficient opportunities for reinforcement
-Will be likely reinforced in the student’s natural environments
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential ReinforcementUsing DRA/DRI effectively
Select reinforcers that are powerful and can be delivered consistently
Consider what is doable?
Reinforce alternate response immediately and consistently!
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential ReinforcementDifferential Reinforcement of Lower Rates
of Behavior/Responding (DRL)
Reinforcing talking out 10 times per hour instead of a previously established rate of 20
times per hourAsking “What time is it?” 6 times per 30 min
instead of a previously established rate of 8 times per 30 min
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential ReinforcementDifferential Reinforcement of Lower Rates
of Behavior/Responding (DRL)
AdvantageBehavior change can be addressed
incrementallyDisadvantages
Attention given to problem behavior Not for use with SIB, and other potentially
dangerous behaviors. Time consuming
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential ReinforcementUsing DRL effectively
Use baseline data to select response limits
Gradually thin the DRL schedule
Provide feedback to the learners concerning their performance
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential ReinforcementInterval DRO
Reinforcement is delivered if NO occurrences of the behavior were observed during an
entire time interval
If the behavior occurs during an interval the interval is re-set and delays the delivery of
reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential ReinforcementExample
A third grade teacher determines a student’s response rate to be 6 times an hour; she sets
her DRO interval at 5 min
If the student exhibits the response during the interval, the timer was re-set for another 5
minutes
If the student did not exhibit the response then the student earned 2 min of free play
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Differential Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Differential ReinforcementUsing DRO effectively
Set intervals to assure frequent reinforcement
Avoid delivering reinforcement at the same time as other problem behaviors are
occurring
Gradually increase DRO intervals
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Big bang theory clip
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Delivering ReinforcementPrimary/unconditioned reinforcers
Secondary/Conditioned reinforcers
Token economies
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Token EconomiesThree components
A list of target behaviors
Tokens are delivered for emitting target behaviors
A menu of back up reinforcers
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Token EconomiesDevelop an understanding of cause and effect
for behavior.Measure occurrence of appropriate behavior. Allow for visual feedback on progress for child.
Reminds adults to reinforce appropriate behavior.
Provides motivation for child to see his/her progress.
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Token EconomiesUsing token economies effectively
Select durable tokensConsider student’s interests in token boards
Deliver tokens immediatelyUse powerful reinforcers
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Token EconomiesUsing token economies effectively
Teach the system
Initially, deliver tokens on a dense schedule for low demand responses
Gradually increase demands
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Punishment ProceduresUsing Punishment Procedures
Punishment procedure should only be used when other methods have failed (Iwata, 1988)
Unfortunately, they are often the first intervention employed in some educational
contexts
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Punishment ProceduresTypes of Punishment Procedures
ReprimandsResponse Interruption/Redirection (RIR)
Response blockingTime out
Response costOvercorrection
Contingent exercise
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Punishment ProceduresProblems associated with punishment-
based procedures
Social acceptabilityDoesn’t teach appropriate responding
Collateral effects on responding
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Punishment ProceduresProblems associated with punishment-
based procedures
Modeling of undesirable behavior Aggressive responses to aversive events
Overuse of Punishment
Prepared by KATC (2010)
PunishmentPrior to implementing any punishment procedures,
there must be data documenting attempts at behavior change using less intrusive procedures
The determination to use punishment procedures should be made by an intervention team involving
input from parents
Procedural fidelity and student responses should bemonitored using continuous data collection
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Reprimands
The delivery of a reprimand immediately following a problem behavior
“In spite of the widespread use of verbal reprimands in an effort to suppress problem
behavior, surprisingly few studies have examined the effectiveness of reprimands as
punishers”
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Response blockingPhysically intervening as soon as a person
emits a problem behavior to prevent or block the completion of the response
Often used to address chronic and automatically reinforced behaviors
The response is blocked using the least intrusive prompt
Prepared by KATC (2010) (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007)
Response Interruption/Redirection
A procedure that combines Response blocking and Differential Reinforcement
Often used as a treatment for automatically reinforced behaviors
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Response Interruption/Redirection
During the FBA the target response to be blocked/interrupted is identified as well as an
alternative response.
Once the response block is provided the participant is immediately prompted to
engage in a competing response using a least to most prompting hierarchy
Prepared by KATC (2010)(Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007: NPDCA. 2009)
Response Interruption/Redirection
Verbal or physical blocking can be used
Student engages in “video talk”Teacher says” What color is your shirt”
Student says “Blue”Teacher delivers praise
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Response Interruption/Redirection
Verbal or physical blocking can be used
Student engages in “hand-mouthing”Teacher blocks
Teacher prompts student to move to the cabinet and request for an edible
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Response CostA loss of a specific amount of reinforcement
occurs contingent on the occurrence of a problem behavior
FinesCombined with Positive Reinforcement
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Response CostBenefits of using Response Cost combined with
Positive Reinforcement
Students do not have to lose all of their tokens
Students have opportunity to earn new tokens(Ensuring a reinforcement reserve)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Time out from positive reinforcement
The withdrawal of the opportunity to access reinforcement or the removal of a reinforcer
for a specified time, contingent on the occurrence of a problem behavior
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Though the use of time out with children seems
prevalent in many contexts, the reality is that it is a punishment procedure and
therefore, subject to the same cautions
In addition, if incorrectly applied (for escape maintained behaviors) it may strengthen
problem behavior
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out May be less appropriate for students with ASD
Consider that many students with ASD may find academic demands challenging, sensory
input overwhelming, and a lack of understanding social cues frustrating.
These students may actually find a removal from educational contexts to be reinforcing
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out In addition, some students with ASD may find
time out an opportunity to engage in automatically reinforced behavior/stereotypy
Again, making time out reinforcing and possibly strengthening problem behavior
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out For example:
Mica walks into the gym with his class. He is overwhelmed by the loud noises and melts
down.The teacher removes the student to the hallway
for a brief 3 minute time out.
The students learns quickly that the fastest way to get out of gym is to meltdown
“Smart kid, huh”Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out So again
Time out from reinforcement should be considered only after other interventions
have failed (and the data show it) A thorough FBA should be conducted and positive reinforcement (attention, tangible)
should be identified as the functionParents should be involved in the decision to
use time out
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Non-Exclusionary
Individual is not physically removed from the time-in setting
Planned ignoringWithdrawal of a specific reinforcer
Contingent observation
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Exclusionary
Student is removed entirely from the environment for a specified period
Very difficult to implement accurately & effectively in school settings
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Considerations
The “time-in” environment must be reinforcing
All relevant parties must be informed of the behaviors leading to time out
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Considerations
Keep time out periods brief (2 to 10 min)
Clearly define exit criteria (exit should not be based solely on the passage
of time but on an improved behavioral condition)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out Considerations
Obtain permission before using it
Apply it consistently
Evaluate effectiveness
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Time Out
Again, only when less intrusive procedures have failed should time out be
used
This should involve documentation of the previously conducted interventions
Prepared by KATC (2010)
OvercorrectionBehavior reduction tactic in which contingent on
the occurrence of problem behavior the student is required to engage in effortful behavior related
to the problem
Restitutional( repair the damage caused by the problem
behavior and then some)Positive practice
(repeated practice of correct response or response incompatible with problem behavior)
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Contingent Exercise
Person is required to perform a response that is not topographically related to the problem
behavior
“Drop and give me 20”
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Parting shotsThe success of any behavior change program is
hinged on the accurate identification of reinforcers through FBA
And careful monitoring via continuous data
collection and the graphing of that data
Prepared by KATC (2010)
Parting shotsHow do I select a behavior intervention?
Consider data from the FBAConsider team and parent input
Consider interventions that teach new skillsConsider the least intrusive intervention
for the student and teacher?Consider the difficulty in conducting the
intervention?
Prepared by KATC (2010)
EBP Inventory
Prepared by KATC (2010)