40
Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Household Production Model I:

The allocation of time

Page 2: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Household production model In the household production model,

utility is derived from the activities (Zi) in which people are engaged. U=U(Z1, Z2,…, ZN)

Each final commodity is produced and consumed within the household by combining time and purchased inputs.

Page 3: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Example: college attendance College attendance

Requires time as well as purchased inputs (tuition, books, supplies, etc.)

Page 4: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Full cost The full cost of an activity includes

the opportunity cost of time as well as the opportunity cost of purchased inputs.

Example – college enrollments often increase during recessions due to lower opportunity cost of time.

Page 5: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Assumptions U=U(Z1, Z2,…, ZN) Zi=fi(ti,xi) Where:

ti = amount of time devoted to producing and consuming commodity i.

xi = amount of purchased inputs devoted to producing and consuming commodity i. (This is a composite commodity that is an index of all purchased inputs used in producing final commodities.)

Page 6: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Time constraint

Page 7: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Goods constraint

Page 8: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Constraints

Solving the time constraint for time at work:

Substituting this into the goods constraint results in:

Page 9: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Full-income constraint After a little algebraic manipulation,

the full income constraint is given by the formula below.

The first time is the opportunity cost of goods, the second is the opportunity cost of time.

Page 10: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Full-income constraint (cont.) The full-income constraint may

also be expressed as:

Where FCi = full cost of Zi:

Page 11: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Applications Individuals are assumed to minimize

the full cost of consuming any commodity. This model may explain: the growth of the fast-food industry, why convenience stores can survive while

charging higher prices than grocery stores,

the decline in fertility, and why many people do not use coupons in

grocery stores.

Page 12: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Isoquants This diagram

illustrates the possible combinations of time and purchased inputs to provide a given quantity and quality of meals.

Page 13: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Indifference curves / isoquants

An isoquant is also an indifference curve since Zi is held constant.

Page 14: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Points on an isoquant At point A, an

individual may prepare meals using basic ingredients such as flour, vegetables, meat, etc.

the individual is using a large quantity of time, but a relatively low level of purchased inputs.

Page 15: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Points on an isoquant (cont.)

At point B, the individual prepares meals of the same quality using prepackaged mixes, frozen meals, and other preprocessed ingredients.

Page 16: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Points on an isoquant (cont.)

The individual uses less of his or her own time and more purchased ingredients when producing and consuming meals at point C.

This may involve meals consumed in restaurants or meals delivered to the home from restaurants.

Page 17: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Other isoquants Points that

lie above an isoquant correspond to the production of a higher level of Zi.

Page 18: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Isocost curves Isocost curves

have a slope equal to -w/p (the negative of the real wage).

The level of total costs increase as the level of time and purchased inputs increase.

Page 19: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Cost minimization The least costly

combination of time and purchased inputs occurs at the point of tangency between the isoquant curve and an isocost curve.

This occurs at point E.

Page 20: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Wage increase: substitution effects

First type: As the wage rate

increases, the relative price of time rises and households substitute purchased inputs for time in the production and consumption of a given level of each commodity.

Page 21: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Substitution effects Second type:

Some activities are inherently more time-intensive than other activities. When the wage rate increases, the relative price of time-intensive activities increases. In response, goods-intensive activities are substituted for time-intensive activities.

Under both types of substitution effect, a higher wage reduces the quantity of time used in household production and increases the amount of time spent at work.

Page 22: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Income effect An increase in the

wage also increases the quantity of final commodities (Zi) consumed.

This income effect tends to increase the amount of time required for the production and consumption of these commodities.

xB

xC

tB tC

Page 23: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Backward-bending labor supply curve

The labor supply curve is upward sloping if the substitution effects are larger in magnitude than the income effect.

An individual operates on a backward-bending portion of his or her labor supply curve if the income effect is larger than the substitution effects.

Page 24: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Specialization If a household wishes to produce output

efficiently, each individual should specialize in those tasks in which he or she possesses a comparative advantage. a household member possesses a

comparative advantage in an activity if the opportunity cost of the activity is lower for this individual than for any other member of the household.)

Page 25: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Sources of comparative advantage

A comparative advantage may exist if: an individual is more productive in an

activity than other members of the household (in this case an “absolute advantage” is said to occur), or

because the individual’s time is relatively less valuable in alternative activities.

Page 26: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Gender division of labor Historically, married women have tended

to specialize in household production and married males have tended to specialize in market production.

Comparative advantage for women in household production in the past?

Possible reasons: high completed fertility rates, high infant mortality rates, and labor market discrimination.

Page 27: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Evolving gender roles As infant mortality and completed

fertility rates decline and as female wage rates rise, it is expected that this division of labor between spouses will be altered. In recent years, married women have

substantially increased the amount of time spent in the paid labor market and have spent slightly less in household production).

Married men now spend slightly more time in household production than in the past.

Page 28: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Specialization or shared activities?

Both spouses will tend to work together in household production tasks in which their time is complementary

Individuals will specialize (according to comparative advantage) when one spouse’s time is a substitute for that of the other spouse.

Page 29: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Additional worker effect The labor force participation rate generally

declines during recessions as a result of an increase in the number of discouraged workers.

In a household, however, one spouse may increase his or her labor supply (or enter the labor market) if the other spouse becomes unemployed.

This “additional worker effect” partly offsets the “discouraged worker effect” discussed earlier.

The additional worker effect is smaller in magnitude than the discouraged worker effect.

Page 30: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Additional worker effect (cont.) The additional worker effect is relatively small

because the expected wage declines during a recession:E(w) = w

where: E(w) = expected wage

= probability of employment

w = wage rate if employed

As the unemployment rate rises during a recession, the probability of being employed, , declines, leading to a reduction in the expected wage.

Page 31: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Female labor supply and divorce Married women tend to increase their

labor supply when a divorce becomes more likely.

This is partly to prepare for the reduction in the division of labor that occurs after the divorce. Empirical evidence suggests that the level

of per capita consumption declines by a larger amount in the portion of the splitoff household headed by divorced women.

Page 32: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Lifetime labor supply decisions

The productivity of time in the paid labor force varies over the lifecycle.

Market wages vary over time as productivity changes.

Page 33: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Lifecycle labor supply individuals are

expected to spend more time working in the paid labor market (and less time in household production) when market wage rates are relatively high.

Page 34: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Labor force participation and childrearing

Historically, many married females chose to reduce the quantity of labor supplied or leave the labor force during their childbearing years.

Page 35: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Changes in LFPR for married women

As fertility levels have declined and market wage rates have increased, a smaller proportion of married working mothers exit the labor force during the childbearing years today than in past decades.

Page 36: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Social Security & Retirement Age

an increase in the level of retirement benefits induces individuals to retire earlier.

Page 37: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Single-parent households and welfare

Many single parents (typically female) remain out of the labor force

Page 38: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Child Support Enforcement Act

the budget constraint facing the custodial parent shifts vertically upward.

reduces state welfare expenditures even if there is no effect on labor supply

Page 39: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Child Support Enforcement Act

Increases labor supply for some welfare recipients who were initially out of the labor force.

Page 40: Household Production Model I: The allocation of time

Child Support Enforcement Act

is expected to reduce labor supply if the custodial parent is initially working.