Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Optimization of a neutrino factoryfor non-standard interactions
Joachim Kopp
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany
IDS-NF Plenary Meeting, June 2008, Fermilab
arXiv:0804.2261 (to be published in Phys. Rev. D)Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 013001 (hep-ph/0702269)Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 013007 (arXiv:0708.0152)
in collaboration with M. Lindner, T. Ota, J. Sato, and W. Winter
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
The general formalism
“New physics” often leaves low-energy fingerprints in the form ofeffective, non-standard 4-fermion interactions (NSI).⇒ Modification of weak interaction Lagrangian
NSI can affect neutrino production, propagation, and detectionGrossman PL B359 (1995) 141Wolfenstein PR D17 (1978) 2369, Valle PL B199 (1987) 432, Guzzo Masiero Petcov PL B260 (1991) 154, Roulet PR D44 (1991) R935, etc.
Lagrangian:
LNSI =GF√
2
∑f,f ′
εs,f,f ′
αβ
[νβγρ(1− γ5)`α
][f ′γρ(1− γ5)f
]+
GF√2
∑f
εm,fαβ
[ναγρ(1− γ5)νβ
][fγρ(1− γ5)f
]+ h.c.,
Lorentz structures different from (V −A)(V −A) are possible, but notconsidered in this talk.see e.g. JK Lindner Ota Sato, arxiv:0708:152 for a discussion of NSI with non-(V − A)(V − A) Lorentz structure.
We will focus on NSI in the propagation (NC NSI) in the following.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
The general formalism
“New physics” often leaves low-energy fingerprints in the form ofeffective, non-standard 4-fermion interactions (NSI).⇒ Modification of weak interaction LagrangianNSI can affect neutrino production, propagation, and detectionGrossman PL B359 (1995) 141Wolfenstein PR D17 (1978) 2369, Valle PL B199 (1987) 432, Guzzo Masiero Petcov PL B260 (1991) 154, Roulet PR D44 (1991) R935, etc.
Lagrangian:
LNSI =GF√
2
∑f,f ′
εs,f,f ′
αβ
[νβγρ(1− γ5)`α
][f ′γρ(1− γ5)f
]+
GF√2
∑f
εm,fαβ
[ναγρ(1− γ5)νβ
][fγρ(1− γ5)f
]+ h.c.,
Lorentz structures different from (V −A)(V −A) are possible, but notconsidered in this talk.see e.g. JK Lindner Ota Sato, arxiv:0708:152 for a discussion of NSI with non-(V − A)(V − A) Lorentz structure.
We will focus on NSI in the propagation (NC NSI) in the following.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
The general formalism
“New physics” often leaves low-energy fingerprints in the form ofeffective, non-standard 4-fermion interactions (NSI).⇒ Modification of weak interaction LagrangianNSI can affect neutrino production, propagation, and detectionGrossman PL B359 (1995) 141Wolfenstein PR D17 (1978) 2369, Valle PL B199 (1987) 432, Guzzo Masiero Petcov PL B260 (1991) 154, Roulet PR D44 (1991) R935, etc.
Lagrangian:
LNSI =GF√
2
∑f,f ′
εs,f,f ′
αβ
[νβγρ(1− γ5)`α
][f ′γρ(1− γ5)f
]+
GF√2
∑f
εm,fαβ
[ναγρ(1− γ5)νβ
][fγρ(1− γ5)f
]+ h.c.,
Lorentz structures different from (V −A)(V −A) are possible, but notconsidered in this talk.see e.g. JK Lindner Ota Sato, arxiv:0708:152 for a discussion of NSI with non-(V − A)(V − A) Lorentz structure.
We will focus on NSI in the propagation (NC NSI) in the following.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
The general formalism
“New physics” often leaves low-energy fingerprints in the form ofeffective, non-standard 4-fermion interactions (NSI).⇒ Modification of weak interaction LagrangianNSI can affect neutrino production, propagation, and detectionGrossman PL B359 (1995) 141Wolfenstein PR D17 (1978) 2369, Valle PL B199 (1987) 432, Guzzo Masiero Petcov PL B260 (1991) 154, Roulet PR D44 (1991) R935, etc.
Lagrangian:
LNSI =GF√
2
∑f,f ′
εs,f,f ′
αβ
[νβγρ(1− γ5)`α
][f ′γρ(1− γ5)f
]+
GF√2
∑f
εm,fαβ
[ναγρ(1− γ5)νβ
][fγρ(1− γ5)f
]+ h.c.,
Lorentz structures different from (V −A)(V −A) are possible, but notconsidered in this talk.see e.g. JK Lindner Ota Sato, arxiv:0708:152 for a discussion of NSI with non-(V − A)(V − A) Lorentz structure.
We will focus on NSI in the propagation (NC NSI) in the following.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
The general formalism
“New physics” often leaves low-energy fingerprints in the form ofeffective, non-standard 4-fermion interactions (NSI).⇒ Modification of weak interaction LagrangianNSI can affect neutrino production, propagation, and detectionGrossman PL B359 (1995) 141Wolfenstein PR D17 (1978) 2369, Valle PL B199 (1987) 432, Guzzo Masiero Petcov PL B260 (1991) 154, Roulet PR D44 (1991) R935, etc.
Lagrangian:
LNSI =GF√
2
∑f,f ′
εs,f,f ′
αβ
[νβγρ(1− γ5)`α
][f ′γρ(1− γ5)f
]+
GF√2
∑f
εm,fαβ
[ναγρ(1− γ5)νβ
][fγρ(1− γ5)f
]+ h.c.,
Lorentz structures different from (V −A)(V −A) are possible, but notconsidered in this talk.see e.g. JK Lindner Ota Sato, arxiv:0708:152 for a discussion of NSI with non-(V − A)(V − A) Lorentz structure.
We will focus on NSI in the propagation (NC NSI) in the following.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:
Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parametersMismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experimentsDifferent optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:
Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parametersMismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experimentsDifferent optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)
Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parametersMismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experimentsDifferent optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parameters
Mismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experimentsDifferent optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parametersMismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experiments
Different optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parametersMismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experiments
0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2Sin22Θ13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
∆C
P
T2K � Double Chooz H90% C.L.L
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Cho
oz90
%E
xclu
ded
ÈΕeΤm È = 0.5
argHΕeΤm L = -Π�2
Reactor
Beam NH
Beam IH
"True"params
GLoBES
0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1Sin22Θ13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
∆C
P
T2K � Double Chooz H90% C.L.L
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Cho
oz90
%E
xclu
ded
ΕeΤs= ΕΤe
d= 0.05
Reactor
Beam NH
Beam IH
"True"params
GLoBES
JK Ota Lindner Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 013007
Different optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments The general formalism
NSI in oscillation experiments
Compared to charged lepton flavour violation experiments: Interferencebetween standard and non-standard amplitudes is possible⇒ NSI effects suppressed only by |ε| instead of |ε|2.Grossman 1995, Wolfenstein 1977, Valle 1987, Guzzo 1991, Roulet 1991, Bergmann 1999, Gago 2001.
Possible consequences in oscillation experiments:Poor quality of standard oscillation fit (⇒ Detection of NSI possible)Offset: Wrong reconstruction of neutrino mixing parametersMismatch between standard oscillation fits to different experimentsDifferent optimization strategy
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF appearance channel
µ+ νe∼ 1
θ13
θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ−
Standard path (suppressed by θ13): µ+ → νeθ13−−→ νµ → µ−
Assume ε ∼ θ13
NSI paths with same level of suppression as standard path:
µ+ → νe
εmeµ−−→ νµ → µ−
µ+ → νeεm
eτ−−→ ντθ23−−→ νµ → µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF appearance channel
µ+ νe∼ 1
θ13
θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ−
Standard path (suppressed by θ13): µ+ → νeθ13−−→ νµ → µ−
Assume ε ∼ θ13
NSI paths with same level of suppression as standard path:
µ+ → νe
εmeµ−−→ νµ → µ−
µ+ → νeεm
eτ−−→ ντθ23−−→ νµ → µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF appearance channel
µ+ νe∼ 1
θ13
θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ−
Standard path (suppressed by θ13): µ+ → νeθ13−−→ νµ → µ−
Assume ε ∼ θ13
NSI paths with same level of suppression as standard path:
µ+ → νe
εmeµ−−→ νµ → µ−
µ+ → νeεm
eτ−−→ ντθ23−−→ νµ → µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF appearance channel
µ+ νe∼ 1
θ13
θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ−
Standard path (suppressed by θ13): µ+ → νeθ13−−→ νµ → µ−
Assume ε ∼ θ13
NSI paths with same level of suppression as standard path:
µ+ → νe
εmeµ−−→ νµ → µ−
µ+ → νeεm
eτ−−→ ντθ23−−→ νµ → µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF disappearance channel
µ+ νµ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ+
Standard path (unsuppressed): µ+ → νµ → νµ → µ+
Dominant NSI paths:
µ+ → νµ
εmµµ−−→ νµ → µ+
µ+ → νµθ23−−→ ντ
εmττ−−→ ντ
θ23−−→ νµ → µ+
µ+ → νµ
εmµτ−−→ ντ
θ23−−→ νµ → µ+
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF disappearance channel
µ+ νµ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ+
Standard path (unsuppressed): µ+ → νµ → νµ → µ+
Dominant NSI paths:
µ+ → νµ
εmµµ−−→ νµ → µ+
µ+ → νµθ23−−→ ντ
εmττ−−→ ντ
θ23−−→ νµ → µ+
µ+ → νµ
εmµτ−−→ ντ
θ23−−→ νµ → µ+
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
NSI in the NF disappearance channel
µ+ νµ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εmee
εmeµ
εmeτ
εmeµ 1 + εm
µµ
εmµτ
εmeτ
εmµτ
1 + εmττ
νe
νµ
ντ
θ13
θ23
θ23
νµ µ+
Standard path (unsuppressed): µ+ → νµ → νµ → µ+
Dominant NSI paths:
µ+ → νµ
εmµµ−−→ νµ → µ+
µ+ → νµθ23−−→ ντ
εmττ−−→ ντ
θ23−−→ νµ → µ+
µ+ → νµ
εmµτ−−→ ντ
θ23−−→ νµ → µ+
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Classification of NSI in a neutrino factory
Relevant NSI in appearance channel: εmeµ, εm
eτ
Relevant NSI in disappearance channel: εmµµ, εm
ττ , εmµτ
Combination of appearance and disappearance channels provides ahandle on all εm parameters except εm
ee (which is special anyway, beingintimately correlated with the standard matter potential).Already at this level, one can see that the Silver channel is not needed todetect NSI.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Classification of NSI in a neutrino factory
Relevant NSI in appearance channel: εmeµ, εm
eτ
Relevant NSI in disappearance channel: εmµµ, εm
ττ , εmµτ
Combination of appearance and disappearance channels provides ahandle on all εm parameters except εm
ee (which is special anyway, beingintimately correlated with the standard matter potential).Already at this level, one can see that the Silver channel is not needed todetect NSI.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Classification of NSI in a neutrino factory
Relevant NSI in appearance channel: εmeµ, εm
eτ
Relevant NSI in disappearance channel: εmµµ, εm
ττ , εmµτ
Combination of appearance and disappearance channels provides ahandle on all εm parameters except εm
ee (which is special anyway, beingintimately correlated with the standard matter potential).
Already at this level, one can see that the Silver channel is not needed todetect NSI.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Classification of NSI in a neutrino factory
Relevant NSI in appearance channel: εmeµ, εm
eτ
Relevant NSI in disappearance channel: εmµµ, εm
ττ , εmµτ
Combination of appearance and disappearance channels provides ahandle on all εm parameters except εm
ee (which is special anyway, beingintimately correlated with the standard matter potential).Already at this level, one can see that the Silver channel is not needed todetect NSI.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Relevant oscillation channels for εmeτ and εm
ττ sensitivity
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4ΕΤΤ
m
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
Ε eΤm
Golden+Disappearance
GLoBES 2008
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1ΕΤΤ
m
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
ÈΕ e
ΤmÈ
Golden+Disappearance
GLoBES 2008
ΦeΤm marginalized
ΕeΤm sensitivity
-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1ΕΤΤ
m
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
ÈΕ e
ΤmÈ
Golden+Disapp.+Silver*
GLoBES 2008
ΦeΤm marginalized
ΕeΤm sensitivity
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4ΕΤΤ
m
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
Ε eΤm
L=4000km, Golden channel only
3Σ 2Σ
1Σ
GLoBES 2008
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4ΕΤΤ
m
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
Ε eΤm
L=7500km, Golden channel only
GLoBES 2008
-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4ΕΤΤ
m
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
Ε eΤm
L=4000km+7500km, Golden channel only
GLoBES 2008
Ribeiro Minakata Nunokawa Uchinami Zukanovich-Funchal JHEP 0712 (2007) 002, JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ
Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ
Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ
Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ
Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ
Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ
Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Further restrictions
εmee: Effect equivalent to systematically biased matter density
εmeµ: Strong existing bounds from charged LFV (εm
eµ < 5× 10−4)Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
εmµµ: effect very similar to εm
ττ Most interesting
εmeτ
εmµτ
εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments NSI in a neutrino factory
Classification of NSI in a neutrino factory — Summary
For the NF optimization, we need to consider only εmeτ , εm
µτ , and εmττ .
We expect:The Golden channel will be sensitive to εm
eτ .The Silver channel will be sensitive to εm
eτ , but will not be needed.The disappearance channel will be sensitive to εm
µτ and εmττ .
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Modified neutrino oscillation probabilities
Standard oscillations
Pνα→νβ= |〈νβ |e−iHL|να〉|2
Oscillations with neutral current NSI
Pνsα→νd
β= |〈νβ |e−i(H+VNSI)L|να〉|2
VNSI =√
2GF Ne
εmee εm
eµ εmeτ
εm∗eµ εm
µµ εmµτ
εm∗eτ εm∗
µτ εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Modified neutrino oscillation probabilities
Standard oscillations
Pνα→νβ= |〈νβ |e−iHL|να〉|2
Oscillations with neutral current NSI
Pνsα→νd
β= |〈νβ |e−i(H+VNSI)L|να〉|2
VNSI =√
2GF Ne
εmee εm
eµ εmeτ
εm∗eµ εm
µµ εmµτ
εm∗eτ εm∗
µτ εmττ
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expression for Peµ including |εmeτ |
P NSIeµ ' P SO
eµ − 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φm
eτ )FMB FRes sin∆
− 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φm
eτ )FMB FRes cos∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23 s2
23 cos(δCP + φmeτ ) A
`FRes´2
− 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φm
eτ FMB FRes sin∆
+ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φm
eτ FMB FRes cos∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23 c2
23 cos φmeτ
1
A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |2 c2
23 s223 A2 `
FRes´2
− 2 |εmeτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |2 s2
23c223
`FMB´2
.
A ≡ ±aCC/∆m231 = ±2
√2EGF Ne/∆m
231, Matter potential
∆ ≡ ∆m231L/4E , Vacuum oscillation phase
FRes≡ sin[(1 − A)∆]/(1 − A) , Maximal at matter resonance
FMB≡ sin(A∆) = sin
„± GF√
2NeL
«. Vanishes at magic baseline
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expressions for Peµ and Peτ including |εmeτ |
„P NSI
eµ
P NSIeτ
«'
„P SO
eµ
P SOeτ
«∓ 2 |εm
eτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φmeτ )FMB FRes sin∆
∓ 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φm
eτ )FMB FRes cos∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23
„s2
23
c223
«cos(δCP + φm
eτ ) A`FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φm
eτ FMB FRes sin∆
± 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φm
eτ FMB FRes cos∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23
„c223
s223
«cos φm
eτ1
A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |2 c2
23
„s2
23
c223
«A2 `
FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |2 s2
23
„c223
s223
« `FMB´2
.
Strong correlations, even at magic baselineφm
eτ can yield CP violation even for θ13 = 0.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ differ only in the signs of certain terms.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ are identical at the magic baseline.(⇒ Silver channel at magic baseline would be useless.). . .
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expressions for Peµ and Peτ including |εmeτ |
P NSI
eµ
P NSIeτ
!'
P SOeµ
P SOeτ
!∓ 2 |εm
eτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φmeτ )FMB FRes sin ∆
∓ 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φ
meτ )FMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23
s223
c223
!cos(δCP + φ
meτ ) A
`FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φ
meτ F
MB FRes sin ∆
± 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φ
meτ F
MB FRes cos ∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23
c223
s223
!cos φ
meτ
1A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2c223
s223
c223
!A
2 `FRes´2∓ 2 |εm
eτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2s223
c223
s223
! `FMB´2
.
Strong correlations, even at magic baseline
φmeτ can yield CP violation even for θ13 = 0.
For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ differ only in the signs of certain terms.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ are identical at the magic baseline.(⇒ Silver channel at magic baseline would be useless.). . .
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expressions for Peµ and Peτ including |εmeτ |
P NSI
eµ
P NSIeτ
!'
P SOeµ
P SOeτ
!∓ 2 |εm
eτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φmeτ )FMB FRes sin ∆
∓ 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φ
meτ )FMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23
s223
c223
!cos(δCP + φ
meτ ) A
`FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φ
meτ F
MB FRes sin ∆
± 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φ
meτ F
MB FRes cos ∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23
c223
s223
!cos φ
meτ
1A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2c223
s223
c223
!A
2 `FRes´2∓ 2 |εm
eτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2s223
c223
s223
! `FMB´2
.
Strong correlations, even at magic baselineφm
eτ can yield CP violation even for θ13 = 0.
For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ differ only in the signs of certain terms.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ are identical at the magic baseline.(⇒ Silver channel at magic baseline would be useless.). . .
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expressions for Peµ and Peτ including |εmeτ |
P NSI
eµ
P NSIeτ
!'
P SOeµ
P SOeτ
!∓ 2 |εm
eτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φmeτ )FMB FRes sin ∆
∓ 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φ
meτ )FMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23
s223
c223
!cos(δCP + φ
meτ ) A
`FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φ
meτ F
MB FRes sin ∆
± 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φ
meτ F
MB FRes cos ∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23
c223
s223
!cos φ
meτ
1A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2c223
s223
c223
!A
2 `FRes´2∓ 2 |εm
eτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2s223
c223
s223
! `FMB´2
.
Strong correlations, even at magic baselineφm
eτ can yield CP violation even for θ13 = 0.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ differ only in the signs of certain terms.
For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ are identical at the magic baseline.(⇒ Silver channel at magic baseline would be useless.). . .
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expressions for Peµ and Peτ including |εmeτ |
P NSI
eµ
P NSIeτ
!'
P SOeµ
P SOeτ
!∓ 2 |εm
eτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φmeτ )FMB FRes sin ∆
∓ 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φ
meτ )FMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23
s223
c223
!cos(δCP + φ
meτ ) A
`FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φ
meτ F
MB FRes sin ∆
± 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φ
meτ F
MB FRes cos ∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23
c223
s223
!cos φ
meτ
1A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2c223
s223
c223
!A
2 `FRes´2∓ 2 |εm
eτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2s223
c223
s223
! `FMB´2
.
Strong correlations, even at magic baselineφm
eτ can yield CP violation even for θ13 = 0.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ differ only in the signs of certain terms.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ are identical at the magic baseline.(⇒ Silver channel at magic baseline would be useless.)
. . .
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Non-standard interactions in oscillation experiments Analytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
Analytic expressions for Peµ and Peτ including |εmeτ |
P NSI
eµ
P NSIeτ
!'
P SOeµ
P SOeτ
!∓ 2 |εm
eτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 sin(δCP + φmeτ )FMB FRes sin ∆
∓ 2 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 sin 2θ23 s23 cos(δCP + φ
meτ )FMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ | sin 2θ13 c23
s223
c223
!cos(δCP + φ
meτ ) A
`FRes´2
∓ 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 sin φ
meτ F
MB FRes sin ∆
± 2 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 c23 cos φ
meτ F
MB FRes cos ∆
− 4 |εmeτ |α sin 2θ12 s23
c223
s223
!cos φ
meτ
1A
`FMB´2
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2c223
s223
c223
!A
2 `FRes´2∓ 2 |εm
eτ |2 sin2 2θ23 AFMB FRes cos ∆
+ 4 |εmeτ |
2s223
c223
s223
! `FMB´2
.
Strong correlations, even at magic baselineφm
eτ can yield CP violation even for θ13 = 0.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ differ only in the signs of certain terms.For θ23 = π/4, Peµ and Peτ are identical at the magic baseline.(⇒ Silver channel at magic baseline would be useless.). . .J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errorsParameter correlationsDegeneraciesExternal input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)
χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errorsParameter correlationsDegeneraciesExternal input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errorsParameter correlationsDegeneraciesExternal input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errors
Parameter correlationsDegeneraciesExternal input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errorsParameter correlations
DegeneraciesExternal input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errorsParameter correlationsDegeneracies
External input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Numerical simulation techniques
All simulations have been performed with GLoBES 3.0Huber Lindner Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 195,Huber JK Lindner Rolinec Winter Comput. Phys. Commun. 177 (2007) 432http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/∼globes
Event rate based simulations (no Monte Carlo)χ2 analysis includes
Systematical errorsParameter correlationsDegeneraciesExternal input on those parameters which cannot be determined by theexperiment under consideration
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.
Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarityMuon energy: Eµ = 25 GeVGolden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulatedCharge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)
Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarityMuon energy: Eµ = 25 GeVGolden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulatedCharge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels
2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarityMuon energy: Eµ = 25 GeVGolden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulatedCharge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarity
Muon energy: Eµ = 25 GeVGolden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulatedCharge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarityMuon energy: Eµ = 25 GeV
Golden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulatedCharge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarityMuon energy: Eµ = 25 GeVGolden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulated
Charge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Simulation details
Neutrino factory setup (IDS-NF 1.0 baseline)
Two 50 kt magnetized iron detectors @ L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km.Optional 10 kt silver channel detector (emulsion cloud chamber)Hypothetical Silver* detector (signal ×5, background ×3) incorporateshadronic τ decay channels2.5× 1021 useful muon decays per baseline and polarityMuon energy: Eµ = 25 GeVGolden (νe → νµ), Silver (νe → ντ ), and Disappearance (νµ → νµ)channels simulatedCharge ID in Golden and Silver channels, but not in disappearancechannel
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of muon energy
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of muon energy
Optimization of muon energy
20 40 60 80 10010-3
10-2
10-1
EΜ @GeVD
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕΑΒ
mÈ
IDS-
NF
GLoBES 2008
sin2 2Θ13true = 0.001
∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
ÈΕeΤm È
ÈΕΜΤm È
ÈΕΤΤm È
Improvement bySilver detector � 4000 km
Improvement bySilver* detector � 4000 km
20 40 60 80 10010-3
10-2
10-1
EΜ @GeVD
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕΑΒ
mÈ
IDS-
NF
GLoBES 2008
sin2 2Θ13true = 0.01
∆CPtrue = 0
ÈΕeΤm È
ÈΕΜΤm È
ÈΕΤΤm È
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Eµ = 25 GeV is optimal.(Eµ > 25 GeV → no significant improvementEµ < 25 GeV → sensitivity decreases dramatically)Silver channel only useful at Eµ � 25 GeV.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of muon energy
Optimization of muon energy
20 40 60 80 10010-3
10-2
10-1
EΜ @GeVD
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕΑΒ
mÈ
IDS-
NF
GLoBES 2008
sin2 2Θ13true = 0.001
∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
ÈΕeΤm È
ÈΕΜΤm È
ÈΕΤΤm È
Improvement bySilver detector � 4000 km
Improvement bySilver* detector � 4000 km
20 40 60 80 10010-3
10-2
10-1
EΜ @GeVD
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕΑΒ
mÈ
IDS-
NF
GLoBES 2008
sin2 2Θ13true = 0.01
∆CPtrue = 0
ÈΕeΤm È
ÈΕΜΤm È
ÈΕΤΤm È
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Eµ = 25 GeV is optimal.(Eµ > 25 GeV → no significant improvementEµ < 25 GeV → sensitivity decreases dramatically)
Silver channel only useful at Eµ � 25 GeV.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of muon energy
Optimization of muon energy
20 40 60 80 10010-3
10-2
10-1
EΜ @GeVD
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕΑΒ
mÈ
IDS-
NF
GLoBES 2008
sin2 2Θ13true = 0.001
∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
ÈΕeΤm È
ÈΕΜΤm È
ÈΕΤΤm È
Improvement bySilver detector � 4000 km
Improvement bySilver* detector � 4000 km
20 40 60 80 10010-3
10-2
10-1
EΜ @GeVD
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕΑΒ
mÈ
IDS-
NF
GLoBES 2008
sin2 2Θ13true = 0.01
∆CPtrue = 0
ÈΕeΤm È
ÈΕΜΤm È
ÈΕΤΤm È
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Eµ = 25 GeV is optimal.(Eµ > 25 GeV → no significant improvementEµ < 25 GeV → sensitivity decreases dramatically)Silver channel only useful at Eµ � 25 GeV.J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of Silver channel baseline
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000Baseline of Silver* Detector @kmD
10-3
5×10-3
10-2
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕ eΤmÈ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.001, ∆CP
true=0
IDS-
NF
base
line
GLoBES 2008
EΜ=25 GeV
EΜ=50 GeV
EΜ=100 GeV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000Baseline of Silver* Detector @kmD
10-3
5×10-3
10-2
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕ eΤmÈ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01, ∆CP
true=3Π�2
GLoBES 2008
Conclusion: Silver channel only useful at L = 4000 km and Eµ � 25 GeV.⇒ We can omit the Silver channel in the rest of our discussion.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of Silver channel baseline
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000Baseline of Silver* Detector @kmD
10-3
5×10-3
10-2
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕ eΤmÈ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.001, ∆CP
true=0
IDS-
NF
base
line
GLoBES 2008
EΜ=25 GeV
EΜ=50 GeV
EΜ=100 GeV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000Baseline of Silver* Detector @kmD
10-3
5×10-3
10-2
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕ eΤmÈ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01, ∆CP
true=3Π�2
GLoBES 2008
Conclusion: Silver channel only useful at L = 4000 km and Eµ � 25 GeV.
⇒ We can omit the Silver channel in the rest of our discussion.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of Silver channel baseline
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000Baseline of Silver* Detector @kmD
10-3
5×10-3
10-2
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕ eΤmÈ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.001, ∆CP
true=0
IDS-
NF
base
line
GLoBES 2008
EΜ=25 GeV
EΜ=50 GeV
EΜ=100 GeV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000Baseline of Silver* Detector @kmD
10-3
5×10-3
10-2
Sens
itivi
tytoÈΕ eΤmÈ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01, ∆CP
true=3Π�2
GLoBES 2008
Conclusion: Silver channel only useful at L = 4000 km and Eµ � 25 GeV.⇒ We can omit the Silver channel in the rest of our discussion.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for θ13, MH, CPV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
sin2 2Θ13 sensitivity
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ìì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.4
Standard Fit
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Normal MH sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.6
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Max. CPV sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
All performance indicators
Core crossing
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
EΜ = 25 GeV
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Performance indicators:
sin2 2θ13 sensitivity:What is the newexclusion limit ifθtrue13 = 0?
Normal MH/max. CPVsensitivity: How largedoes sin2 2θ13 have to beto guarantee detectionof NH/max. CPV?
Conclusion:L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 kmis close to optimal even ifNSI are included in the fit.(We checked this also for theother εm
αβ)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for θ13, MH, CPV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
sin2 2Θ13 sensitivity
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ìì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.4
Standard Fit
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Normal MH sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.6
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Max. CPV sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
All performance indicators
Core crossing
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
EΜ = 25 GeV
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Performance indicators:
sin2 2θ13 sensitivity:What is the newexclusion limit ifθtrue13 = 0?
Normal MH/max. CPVsensitivity: How largedoes sin2 2θ13 have to beto guarantee detectionof NH/max. CPV?
Conclusion:L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 kmis close to optimal even ifNSI are included in the fit.(We checked this also for theother εm
αβ)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for θ13, MH, CPV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
sin2 2Θ13 sensitivity
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ìì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.4
Standard Fit
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Normal MH sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.6
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Max. CPV sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
All performance indicators
Core crossing
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
EΜ = 25 GeV
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Performance indicators:sin2 2θ13 sensitivity:What is the newexclusion limit ifθtrue13 = 0?
Normal MH/max. CPVsensitivity: How largedoes sin2 2θ13 have to beto guarantee detectionof NH/max. CPV?
Conclusion:L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 kmis close to optimal even ifNSI are included in the fit.(We checked this also for theother εm
αβ)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for θ13, MH, CPV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
sin2 2Θ13 sensitivity
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ìì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.4
Standard Fit
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Normal MH sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.6
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Max. CPV sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
All performance indicators
Core crossing
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
EΜ = 25 GeV
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Performance indicators:sin2 2θ13 sensitivity:What is the newexclusion limit ifθtrue13 = 0?
Normal MH/max. CPVsensitivity: How largedoes sin2 2θ13 have to beto guarantee detectionof NH/max. CPV?
Conclusion:L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 kmis close to optimal even ifNSI are included in the fit.(We checked this also for theother εm
αβ)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for θ13, MH, CPV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
sin2 2Θ13 sensitivity
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ìì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.4
Standard Fit
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Normal MH sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.6
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Max. CPV sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
All performance indicators
Core crossing
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
EΜ = 25 GeV
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Performance indicators:sin2 2θ13 sensitivity:What is the newexclusion limit ifθtrue13 = 0?
Normal MH/max. CPVsensitivity: How largedoes sin2 2θ13 have to beto guarantee detectionof NH/max. CPV?
Conclusion:L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 kmis close to optimal even ifNSI are included in the fit.
(We checked this also for theother εm
αβ)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for θ13, MH, CPV
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
sin2 2Θ13 sensitivity
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ìì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.4
Standard Fit
sin2 2Θ13 < 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Normal MH sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.6
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
Max. CPV sensitivity Hfor ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2L
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
ì
ì
ì
ì
EΜ = 25 GeV
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.8
Standard Fit
Discovery for sin2 2Θ13 > 10-3.2
Fit including ΕeΤm
2000 4000 6000 8000 10 000 12 000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10 000
12 000
L1 @kmD
L2@k
mD
All performance indicators
Core crossing
Symmetr
y axis
Magic baseline
GLoBES 2008
æ
æ
EΜ = 25 GeV
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
Performance indicators:sin2 2θ13 sensitivity:What is the newexclusion limit ifθtrue13 = 0?
Normal MH/max. CPVsensitivity: How largedoes sin2 2θ13 have to beto guarantee detectionof NH/max. CPV?
Conclusion:L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 kmis close to optimal even ifNSI are included in the fit.(We checked this also for theother εm
αβ)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for NSI
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km is OK for εmeτ
For εmµτ and εm
ττ , larger baselines are preferred.Note: NSI sensitivity could be improved if longer baselines werecombined with higher Eµ.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for NSI
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km is OK for εmeτ
For εmµτ and εm
ττ , larger baselines are preferred.Note: NSI sensitivity could be improved if longer baselines werecombined with higher Eµ.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for NSI
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km is OK for εmeτ
For εmµτ and εm
ττ , larger baselines are preferred.
Note: NSI sensitivity could be improved if longer baselines werecombined with higher Eµ.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSI Optimization of baselines
Optimization of baselines for NSI
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
L1 = 4000 km, L2 = 7500 km is OK for εmeτ
For εmµτ and εm
ττ , larger baselines are preferred.Note: NSI sensitivity could be improved if longer baselines werecombined with higher Eµ.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Outline
1 Non-standard interactions in oscillation experimentsThe general formalismNSI in a neutrino factoryAnalytical treatment of NSI in a neutrino factory
2 Optimization of a neutrino factory in the presence of NSISimulation detailsOptimization of muon energyOptimization of baselines
3 Summary and conclusions
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
ÈΕeem È H3ΣL
ÈΕeΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΜΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΤΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΑΒmÈ
sin2 2Θ13
GLoBES 2008
better
5 GeV
25 GeV
50 GeV
Improvement bySilver* � 4000 km
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hno
NSI
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hfi
tinc
ludi
ngΕ eΤm
ÈΕΑΒ
mÈre
ach
ν-fact is a powerful tool tosearch for NSI, in particularεm
eτ , εmµτ , and εm
ττ .Eµ = 25 GeV is OK.L1 = 4000 km,L2 = 7500 km is OK forsin2 2θ13, MH, and CPV, andNSI.Some NSI slightly preferlonger baselines andhigher energies.Silver channel can beomitted for standardphysics and NSI, unless Eµ
is increased significantly.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
ÈΕeem È H3ΣL
ÈΕeΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΜΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΤΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΑΒmÈ
sin2 2Θ13
GLoBES 2008
better
5 GeV
25 GeV
50 GeV
Improvement bySilver* � 4000 km
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hno
NSI
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hfi
tinc
ludi
ngΕ eΤm
ÈΕΑΒ
mÈre
ach
ν-fact is a powerful tool tosearch for NSI, in particularεm
eτ , εmµτ , and εm
ττ .
Eµ = 25 GeV is OK.L1 = 4000 km,L2 = 7500 km is OK forsin2 2θ13, MH, and CPV, andNSI.Some NSI slightly preferlonger baselines andhigher energies.Silver channel can beomitted for standardphysics and NSI, unless Eµ
is increased significantly.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
ÈΕeem È H3ΣL
ÈΕeΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΜΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΤΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΑΒmÈ
sin2 2Θ13
GLoBES 2008
better
5 GeV
25 GeV
50 GeV
Improvement bySilver* � 4000 km
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hno
NSI
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hfi
tinc
ludi
ngΕ eΤm
ÈΕΑΒ
mÈre
ach
ν-fact is a powerful tool tosearch for NSI, in particularεm
eτ , εmµτ , and εm
ττ .Eµ = 25 GeV is OK.
L1 = 4000 km,L2 = 7500 km is OK forsin2 2θ13, MH, and CPV, andNSI.Some NSI slightly preferlonger baselines andhigher energies.Silver channel can beomitted for standardphysics and NSI, unless Eµ
is increased significantly.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
ÈΕeem È H3ΣL
ÈΕeΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΜΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΤΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΑΒmÈ
sin2 2Θ13
GLoBES 2008
better
5 GeV
25 GeV
50 GeV
Improvement bySilver* � 4000 km
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hno
NSI
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hfi
tinc
ludi
ngΕ eΤm
ÈΕΑΒ
mÈre
ach
ν-fact is a powerful tool tosearch for NSI, in particularεm
eτ , εmµτ , and εm
ττ .Eµ = 25 GeV is OK.L1 = 4000 km,L2 = 7500 km is OK forsin2 2θ13, MH, and CPV, andNSI.
Some NSI slightly preferlonger baselines andhigher energies.Silver channel can beomitted for standardphysics and NSI, unless Eµ
is increased significantly.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
ÈΕeem È H3ΣL
ÈΕeΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΜΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΤΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΑΒmÈ
sin2 2Θ13
GLoBES 2008
better
5 GeV
25 GeV
50 GeV
Improvement bySilver* � 4000 km
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hno
NSI
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hfi
tinc
ludi
ngΕ eΤm
ÈΕΑΒ
mÈre
ach
ν-fact is a powerful tool tosearch for NSI, in particularεm
eτ , εmµτ , and εm
ττ .Eµ = 25 GeV is OK.L1 = 4000 km,L2 = 7500 km is OK forsin2 2θ13, MH, and CPV, andNSI.Some NSI slightly preferlonger baselines andhigher energies.
Silver channel can beomitted for standardphysics and NSI, unless Eµ
is increased significantly.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Summary and conclusions
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
sin2 2Θ13
H5ΣL
NH for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
CPV for ∆CPtrue = 3Π�2
H5ΣL
ÈΕeem È H3ΣL
ÈΕeΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΜΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΤΤm È H3ΣL
ÈΕΑΒmÈ
sin2 2Θ13
GLoBES 2008
better
5 GeV
25 GeV
50 GeV
Improvement bySilver* � 4000 km
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hno
NSI
sin2
2Θ13
reac
hfi
tinc
ludi
ngΕ eΤm
ÈΕΑΒ
mÈre
ach
ν-fact is a powerful tool tosearch for NSI, in particularεm
eτ , εmµτ , and εm
ττ .Eµ = 25 GeV is OK.L1 = 4000 km,L2 = 7500 km is OK forsin2 2θ13, MH, and CPV, andNSI.Some NSI slightly preferlonger baselines andhigher energies.Silver channel can beomitted for standardphysics and NSI, unless Eµ
is increased significantly.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Summary and conclusions
Thank you!
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Optimization of baselines for NSI (Eµ = 50 GeV)
JK Ota Winter arXiv:0804.2261
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
Standard path: N∗ → νe → νe → e+
NSI production processes: N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe N∗ εs∗
eµ−−→ νµ N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
NSI detection processes: νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+
νe ↔ νµ and νe ↔ ντ oscillations are suppressed by θ13.Assume only one ε parameter is sizeable
N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
Standard path: N∗ → νe → νe → e+
NSI production processes: N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe N∗ εs∗
eµ−−→ νµ N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
NSI detection processes: νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+
νe ↔ νµ and νe ↔ ντ oscillations are suppressed by θ13.Assume only one ε parameter is sizeable
N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
Standard path: N∗ → νe → νe → e+
NSI production processes: N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe N∗ εs∗
eµ−−→ νµ N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
NSI detection processes: νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+
νe ↔ νµ and νe ↔ ντ oscillations are suppressed by θ13.Assume only one ε parameter is sizeable
N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
Standard path: N∗ → νe → νe → e+
NSI production processes: N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe N∗ εs∗
eµ−−→ νµ N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
NSI detection processes: νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+
νe ↔ νµ and νe ↔ ντ oscillations are suppressed by θ13.
Assume only one ε parameter is sizeableN∗ εs∗
ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
Standard path: N∗ → νe → νe → e+
NSI production processes: N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe N∗ εs∗
eµ−−→ νµ N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
NSI detection processes: νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+
νe ↔ νµ and νe ↔ ντ oscillations are suppressed by θ13.Assume only one ε parameter is sizeable
N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Qualitative arguments (NSI in source in detector)
N∗
1 + εs∗ee
εs∗eµ
εs∗eτ
νe
νµ
ντ
cos 2θ13 ∼ 1
sin 2θ13
sin 2θ13
νe
νµ
ντ
1 + εd∗ee
εd∗µe
εd∗τe
e+
N∗ εs∗ee−−→ νe → νe → e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ → νe → νeεd∗
ee−−→ e+ O(ε) but: absorbed in flux uncertainty
N∗ εs∗eµ−−→ νµ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ εs∗eτ−−→ ντ
sin θ13−−−→ νe → e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ νµ
εd∗µe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
N∗ → νesin θ13−−−→ ντ
εd∗τe−−→ e+ O(ε sin θ13)
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setup
Baseline 3000 km (1 detector only)Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeterParent muon energy: 50 GeVStored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setup
Baseline 3000 km (1 detector only)Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeterParent muon energy: 50 GeVStored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setup
Baseline 3000 km (1 detector only)Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeterParent muon energy: 50 GeVStored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setupBaseline 3000 km (1 detector only)
Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeterParent muon energy: 50 GeVStored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setupBaseline 3000 km (1 detector only)Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeter
Parent muon energy: 50 GeVStored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setupBaseline 3000 km (1 detector only)Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeterParent muon energy: 50 GeV
Stored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
Discovery reach for εmeµ: Minimum value of |εm
eµ| which can no longer befitted with εm
eµ = 0 at a given C.L.
Very challenging due to strong constraint εmeµ . 5× 10−4 (90% C.L.) from
charged lepton flavour violation. Davidson Pena-Garay Rius Santamaria JHEP 03 (2003) 011
Neutrino factory setupBaseline 3000 km (1 detector only)Detector: 50 kt magnetized iron calorimeterParent muon energy: 50 GeVStored muons: 4× 1021 µ+, 4× 1021 µ−
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 0.5× 10−3
|εmeµ| too small
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.0005
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 0.5× 10−3
|εmeµ| too small
↓χ2 of standard oscillation fit isbelow 3σ for all true values of δCP
and arg εmeµ.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.0005
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 0.5× 10−3
|εmeµ| too small
↓χ2 of standard oscillation fit isbelow 3σ for all true values of δCP
and arg εmeµ.↓
No chance for discovery
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.0005
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 0.6× 10−3
|εmeµ| becomes larger
↓For some combinations of δCP
and arg εmeµ, the standard
oscillation fit becomes worse than3σ (white islands appear).
↓Discovery possible for favorablephase combinations
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.0006
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 1× 10−3
|εmeµ| becomes larger
↓For some combinations of δCP
and arg εmeµ, the standard
oscillation fit becomes worse than3σ (white islands appear).
↓Discovery possible for favorablephase combinations
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.001
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 2× 10−3
|εmeµ| becomes larger
↓For some combinations of δCP
and arg εmeµ, the standard
oscillation fit becomes worse than3σ (white islands appear).
↓Discovery possible for favorablephase combinations
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.002
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 4× 10−3
|εmeµ| becomes larger
↓For some combinations of δCP
and arg εmeµ, the standard
oscillation fit becomes worse than3σ (white islands appear).
↓Discovery possible for favorablephase combinations
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.004
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeµ in a neutrino factory
|εmeµ| = 5× 10−3
|εmeµ| is large enough
↓χ2 of standard oscillation fitexceeds 3σ in the wholeparameter plane.
↓Discovery is possible for anyphase combination
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350∆CP
true @DegreesD
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
arg@HΕ
eΜmLt
rueD@D
egre
esD
1Σ
2Σ
3Σ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
dof=2
ÈHΕeΜm Ltrue È=0.005
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Summary of the discovery reach for εmeµ
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
ÈHΕ eΜmLt
rueÈ
HΕeΜm Ltrue discovery reach H3ΣL for NuFact-II
Marginalize all Λ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
GLoBES
5× 10−3
?NSI effect can be discoveredfor all δtrue
CP and arg[(εmeµ)true].
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Summary of the discovery reach for εmeµ
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
ÈHΕ eΜmLt
rueÈ
HΕeΜm Ltrue discovery reach H3ΣL for NuFact-II
Marginalize all Λ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
GLoBES
5× 10−3
?NSI effect can be discoveredfor all δtrue
CP and arg[(εmeµ)true].
5× 10−4
Hard to discover the NSI forany δtrue
CP and arg[(εmeµ)true].
6
Possible to observeNSI depending on δtrue
CP
and arg[(εmeµ)true].
���*
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Summary of the discovery reach for εmeµ
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
ÈHΕ eΜmLt
rueÈ
HΕeΜm Ltrue discovery reach H3ΣL for NuFact-II
Systematics
Fix all Λ
Marginalize all Λ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.01
GLoBES
Discovery reach strongly depends onδtrueCP and arg[(εm
eµ)true].
Systematics and correlations in the fitdo not have a large impact.
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Summary of the discovery reach for εmeµ
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
ÈHΕ eΜmLt
rueÈ
HΕeΜm Ltrue discovery reach H3ΣL for NuFact-II
Systematics
Fix all Λ
Marginalize all Λ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.1 sin2 2Θ13
true=0.01 sin2 2Θ13true=0.001
GLoBES
θtrue13 affects the discovery reach
only marginally
Signal ∝ θ13,Background (standard osc.) ∝ θ2
13
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008
Backup slides
Discovery reach for εmeτ and εs
eµ in a neutrino factory
εmeτ εs
eµ
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
ÈHΕ eΜmLt
rueÈ
HΕeΜm Ltrue discovery reach H3ΣL for NuFact-II
Systematics
Fix all Λ
Marginalize all Λ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.1 sin2 2Θ13
true=0.01 sin2 2Θ13true=0.001
GLoBES
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1ÈHΕ
eΤmLt
rueÈ
HΕeΤm Ltrue discovery reach H3ΣL for NuFact-II
Systematics
Fix all Λ
Marginalize all Λ
sin2 2Θ13true=0.1 sin2 2Θ13
true=0.01 sin2 2Θ13
true=0.001
GLoBES
J. Kopp (MPI Heidelberg) Optimization of a NF for NSI June 2008