Histry of od

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    1/12

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    2/12

    DEFINITIONOrganization development is a system wide application ofbehavioral science knowledge to the planned development

    , improvement, and reinforcement of the strategies ,

    structure and process that lead to organization

    effectiveness

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    3/12

    It involves both 'hard' and 'soft' issues.

    The 'hard' issues for OD are strategies and policies,

    structures and systems. The 'softer' issues are developing

    appropriate skills, behaviours and attitudes to achieve

    optimum performance.

    Both the 'harder' and 'softer' issues of OD need to be

    addressed to avoid conflict between goals and needs.

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    4/12

    HISTORY OF ORGANISATION

    DEVELOPMENT

    LABORATORY TRAINING

    ACTION RESEARCH SURVEY FEEDBACK

    PARTICIPATIVE MANAGEMENT

    QUALITY OF WORK LIFE

    STRATEGIC CHANGE

    C

    UR

    R

    E

    N

    T

    O

    D

    P

    R

    A

    C

    T

    I

    C

    E

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    5/12

    Laboratory Training Background

    Laboratory training began in 1946, when Kurt Levin wasasked for help in research on training community leaders

    A workshop was developed and the community leaders were

    brought together

    At the end of each session the researchers discussed thebehaviors they had observed

    Thus the first T-group was formed in which people reacted

    to data about their own behavior

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    6/12

    The researchers drew two conclusion about this first T-group experiment

    Feedback about group interaction was a rich learningexperience

    The process ofgroupbuilding had potential for learning

    that could be transferred to backhome situations

    Applying T-group techniques to organizations

    gradually became known as team bui lding

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    7/12

    Action Research and Survey

    Feedback BackgroundThe action research contribution began in 1940

    The research needed to be closely linked to the actions

    A collaborative effort was made, to collect theorganizational data

    To analyze the cause of the problem and then to device

    and implement a solution

    Further data was collected to asses the results

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    8/12

    Participative Management

    BackgroundParticipative management is a means of getting

    employees involved in planning and managing change

    Four types of management systemsExploitative authoritative system

    Benevolent authoritative systems

    Consultative systems

    Participative group

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    9/12

    Likert applied system 4 to organization using a survey

    feedback process

    Which asked the members about the present and the ideal

    conditions about the organization

    Generated action plans to move the organization towards

    system 4 condition

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    10/12

    Productivity and quality of work

    life backgroundThe contribution of QWL can be explained in two phases

    This phase was developed in Europe in 1950 based on the

    research of Eric Trist.This program involved developing a work design which

    aimed at better integrating technology and people

    Participation by unions and management in the work

    designThe distinguishing characteristics of this program was

    developing self managing groups

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    11/12

    The second phase of QWL continues under the banner of

    employee involvement

    Employee contribution helps in running the organization

    so that it can be more flexible, productive and competitive

  • 7/29/2019 Histry of od

    12/12

    Strategic Change BackgroundThis background is a recent influence on ODs evolution

    Strategic change involves improving alignment among an

    organization's environment, strategy and designRichard Bechhard used open system planning

    He described the difference between organizations'

    demand and the way it responds could be reduced and

    performance improved