Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Crystal and fiber dual-readout calorimeters: building and understanding them
Silvia Franchino* On behalf of the RD52 Collaboration
*Kirchhoff Institute for Physics
University of Heidelberg, Germany
2 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Outline
• Introduction on Dual Readout Calorimetry
• Overview on tested prototypes with RD52 CERN project
• Chrystal dual readout calorimeter results
• Fiber dual readout calorimeter results
• Construction methods for fiber Cu-Pb calorimeters
3 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
RD52
Dual Readout Calorimetry
CERN project
RD52 is a generic detector R&D project, not linked to any experiment
Goal: • Investigate and eliminate factors that prevent us from measuring hadrons and
jets with similar precision as electrons and photons • Develop a calorimeter that is up to the challenges of future particle physics
experiments (jet energy resolution `dominant factor)
4 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Dual Readout Method
Hadronic shower consists of em component (π0) and non-em component (π+-) Calorimeter response to them is very different Hadronic shower characterized by large fluctuations, event by event, in • Energy sharing between those two components • Amount of invisible energy
5 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Hadronic shower consists of em component (π0) and non-em component (π+-) Calorimeter response to them is very different Hadronic shower characterized by large fluctuations, event by event, in • Energy sharing between those two components • Amount of invisible energy
DREAM: Reduction of fluctuations in em fraction Measurement, event by event, of em fraction of hadron showers
Simultaneous measurement, during shower development, of: • Scintillation light S (dE/dx charged particles) • Cherenkov light C (em part of the shower)
Dual Readout Method
6 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Original DREAM module: numbers More details in yesterday talk from Sehwook Lee
7 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Original DREAM module: method
8 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Hadronic signal linearity
Jet energy resolution Original DREAM module: results
200 GeV “jets”
R. Wigmans, 2014, Bethe Forum, Bonn
9 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
• Build a larger detector reduce effects of side leakage Hard to do and money consuming in a prototype scale
How to improve DREAM had performance
10 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
• Build a larger detector reduce effects of side leakage Hard to do and money consuming in a prototype scale
• Increase Cherenkov light yield (DREAM: 8p.e./GeV Fluctuations contribute 35%/√E)
• Reduce sampling fluctuations (DREAM: this effect contributed ~ 40%/√E)
How to improve DREAM had performance
• Homogeneous EM section (Crystals)
• RD52 new fiber calo (increased sampling fraction, type of fiber optimization)
TOPIC OF THIS TALK
11 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
• Build a larger detector reduce effects of side leakage Hard to do and money consuming in a prototype scale
• Increase Cherenkov light yield (DREAM: 8p.e./GeV Fluctuations contribute 35%/√E)
• Reduce sampling fluctuations (DREAM: this effect contributed ~ 40%/√E)
• Measure Ekin neutrons, correlated to nuclear binding energy loss (invisible energy) From time structure of the signal (NIM A 598 (2009) 422)
How to improve DREAM had performance
Probing the tot. signal distribution with N fraction
N fraction anti-correlated to f em (C/S)
Time structure of DREAM signal. Tail absent in em showers
• Homogeneous EM section (Crystals)
• RD52 new fiber calo (increased sampling fraction, type of fiber optimization)
TOPIC OF THIS TALK
12 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Dual Readout Method
Sampling calorimetry Hom. calorimetry Two types of fibers, Cherenkov and Scintillation separated by construction
Potential to solve light yield + sampling fluctuation problem, Need to separate C and S light.
13 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Dual Readout Method
Sampling calorimetry Hom. calorimetry Two types of fibers, Cherenkov and Scintillation separated by construction
Potential to solve light yield + sampling fluctuation problem, Need to separate C and S light.
DREAM Cu-fiber 2003 - 11 Crystals DRC 2007-11
Single Xtals, prove of principles
• PbWO4 + Pr, Mo doped PbWO4 • BGO • BSO
Matrixes + DREAM, em section
• PbWO4 • Doped PbWO4 • BGO
2010 Pb - Tile DRC
Cu, Pb Fiber DRC 2012- 16 D
REA
M co
ll R
D5
2 co
ll
RD
52
co
ll
14 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Dual Readout Method
Sampling calorimetry Hom. calorimetry Two types of fibers, Cherenkov and Scintillation separated by construction
Potential to solve light yield + sampling fluctuation problem, Need to separate C and S light.
DREAM Cu-fiber 2003 - 11 Crystals DRC 2007-11
Single Xtals, prove of principles
• PbWO4 + Pr, Mo doped PbWO4 • BGO • BSO
Matrixes + DREAM, em section
• PbWO4 • Doped PbWO4 • BGO
2010 Pb - Tile DRC
Cu, Pb Fiber DRC 2012- 16 D
REA
M co
ll R
D5
2 co
ll
RD
52
co
ll
NIM A 762 (2014) 110 NIM A 735 (2014) 120 NIM A 735 (2014) 130 NIM A 808 (2016) 41
NIM A 598 (2009) 710 NIM A 686 (2012) 125 NIM A 610 (2009) 488 NIM A 584 (2008) 273
NIM A 638 (2011) 47 NIM A 640 (2011) 91 NIM A 621 (2010) 212 NIM A 604 (2009) 512 NIM A 593 (2008) 530 NIM A 595 (2008) 359
NIM A A 533 (2005) 305 NIM A A 536 (2005) 29 NIM A A 537 (2005) 537 NIM A 548 (2005) 336 NIM A 550 (2005) 185 NIM A 581 (2007) 643 NIM A 598 (2009) 422
INST 9, (2014) C05009
15 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Test beam @ SPS - CERN
Used particles (both polarities): 4 – 180 GeV electrons, pion/protons, muons
16 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Dual readout with homogeneous materials
(Crystals)
17 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
DRC with homogeneous materials • Xtals have potential to solve light yield + sampling fluctuation problem,
• However need to separate C and S component.
( not
18 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
RD52 Chrystal program
• 2008: PbWO4 crystal matrix + DREAM. Demonstrated the feasibility of applying the dual-readout principles in a crystal calo. Separation C and S components with signal anisotropy,
time structure (NIM A584 (2008) 273)
• 2008: PbWO4, BGO single crystals. Investigated methods to separate C and S light : spectral difference, the time structure, directionality (NIMA595 (2008) 359)
19 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Separation of C, S light in PbWO4, BGO
Steeper leading edge, higher amplitude C component (suppression of S component with 45C temperature)
e 50 GeV
PbWO4
(NIMA595 (2008) 359)
BGO
YELLOW filter BLUE filter
For both crystals: measured 30 p.e./GeV Cher. (in DREAM it was 8)
BGO: better separation between C and S (accuracy of C/S measurement at 1 GeV: ~ 20-30%) thanks • large decay time of the S • spectral differences
TO BE IMPROVED: • C small fraction to total light (big S light yield) • S decay time ~300 ns, too slow
20 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
RD52 Chrystal program
• 2008: PbWO4 crystal matrix + DREAM. Demonstrated the feasibility of applying the dual-readout principles in a crystal calo. Separation C and S components with signal anisotropy,
time structure (NIM A584 (2008) 273)
• 2008: PbWO4, BGO single crystals. Investigated methods to separate C and S light : spectral difference, the time structure, directionality (NIMA595 (2008) 359)
• 2009-2011: BGO, PbWO4 matrixes + DREAM. to see to what extent the dual readout principle (that worked so well to improve the hadronic performance of the DREAM in stand alone) are applicable when most of the shower is deposited in a crystal calorimeter section NIMA 598 (2009) 710, NIM A 610 (2009) 488
21 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Crystal matrix + DREAM calo
200 GeV “jets” BGO + DREAM
Purpose of these tests: to see to what extent the dual readout principle (that worked so well to improve the hadronic performance of the DREAM in stand alone) are applicable when most of the shower is deposited in a crystal calorimeter section
Performed tests: PbWO4 matrix, BGO single Xtal, BGO matrix from L3 experiment (100 crystals) read first with 4 and then with 16 PMT
NIMA 598 (2009) 710, NIM A 610 (2009) 488
The dual-readout principle also worked well for this hybrid calorimeter system.
22 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
RD52 Chrystal program
• 2008: PbWO4 crystal matrix + DREAM. Demonstrated the feasibility of applying the dual-readout principles in a crystal calo. Separation C and S components with signal anisotropy,
time structure (NIM A584 (2008) 273)
• 2008: PbWO4, BGO single crystals. Investigated methods to separate C and S light : spectral difference, the time structure, directionality (NIMA595 (2008) 359)
• 2009-2011: BGO, PbWO4 matrixes + DREAM. to see to what extent the dual readout principle (that worked so well to improve the hadronic performance of the DREAM in stand alone) are applicable when most of the shower is deposited in a crystal calorimeter section NIMA 598 (2009) 710, NIM A 610 (2009) 488
• 2009-2011: Dedicated crystals (PbWO4 doped with Pr and Mo) NIMA 604 (2009) 512, NIMA
621 (2010) 612, NIMA 686 (2012) 125
23 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Doped PbWO4 crystals
24 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Doped PbWO4 crystals
(0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%)
25 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Mo-doped PbWO4 crystals NIMA 604 (2009) 512
Good C/S separation
Mo-doping results: • shift emission spectrum toward higher λ
optical filters • slower S decay time (~50ns) time
information • Shift of self- absorption (measured Cherenkov
l.y only 8 p.e./GeV)
26 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Optimization of Mo-doping NIMA 621 (2010) 612
Choice of OPTICAL FILTERS and % of Mo doping: Compromise between:
• C and S good separation (better UV filter UG11, pure C light, not S contamination)
• C light yield and C light absorption (better softer filter, more gap between filter transmission and self absorption, less contribution to C photoelectron statistics fluctuation
C light yield (p.e./GeV) C light attenuation (in 10 cm)
C/S separation
27 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
0.3% Mo-PbWO4 matrix
• Good E reso if reading the two sides, separation of C and S with OPTICAL FILTERS
• Investigated possibility to readout only one side (more experiment-compatible) and separate C and S with time structure (integral in different time gates)
S from integration of the tail of the signal (small p.e. statistic ) • C Linearity not good due to self absorption
Two sides readout
one sides readout
NIMA 686 (2012) 125
YELLOW filter UV filter
28 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
RD52 Chrystal program
• 2008: PbWO4 crystal matrix + DREAM. Demonstrated the feasibility of applying the dual-readout principles in a crystal calo. Separation C and S components with signal anisotropy,
time structure (NIM A584 (2008) 273)
• 2008: PbWO4, BGO single crystals. Investigated methods to separate C and S light : spectral difference, the time structure, directionality (NIMA595 (2008) 359)
• 2009-2011: BGO, PbWO4 matrixes + DREAM. to see to what extent the dual readout principle (that worked so well to improve the hadronic performance of the DREAM in stand alone) are applicable when most of the shower is deposited in a crystal calorimeter section NIMA 598 (2009) 710, NIM A 610 (2009) 488
• 2009-2011: Dedicated crystals (PbWO4 doped with Pr and Mo) NIMA 604 (2009) 512, NIMA
621 (2010) 612, NIMA 686 (2012) 125
• 2011 BSO- BGO single crystal performances comparison NIMA640 (2011) 91
• 2011 Separation of C and S light with Polarization of C light (BSO crystals) NIMA 638 (2011)
47
29 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
BSO (bismuth silicate, Bi4Si3O12) (Ishii et al., Optical Materials 19, (2002); Harada et al., Jpn.J. Appl.Phys.Vol.40 (2001) ;
Kobayashi et al. Nim 205 (1983) 113-116, RD52 coll NIMA640 (2011) 91)
Same as BGO but with Si atoms instead of Ge; developed to increase rad hardness and decrease costs.
Measured results: BSO vs BSO
• faster signal (~100 ns) • smaller Scint l.y. (~1/4) • Better transparency to C light
(absorption cutoff < 300 nm) • C/S BSO ~ 5 C/S BGO
• Same absorption • C l.y. BSO > BGO
Time (ns)
Best Crystal found for dual readout calorimetry
Possibility to read onlt one side with UV or BLUE filter and discriminate S and C components with time structure
30 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Conclusion from testing
homogeneous DRC CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE TESTING: ADVANTAGES: • No sampling fluctuations • simpler calibration
FORESEEN DISADVANTAGES: • No sensitivity to neutrons • high cost • rad harness
ADDITIONAL OUCOMES FROM PERFORMED TESTS:
31 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
To separate the C and S component, crystals have to be readout in non conventional way results not good as the ones obtained by standard em calorimetry
• Extraction of pure C and S signals implies • To sacrifice a large fraction of available C photons (optical filters) • C photons are attenuated by crystal UV self absorption
Chrystal + optical filters: don’t offer a benefit in term of C light yield in dual readout calorimetry
(comparable with the one measured with the RD52 fiber calorimeter)
Conclusion from testing
homogeneous DRC CONSIDERATIONS BEFORE TESTING: ADVANTAGES: • No sampling fluctuations • simpler calibration
FORESEEN DISADVANTAGES: • No sensitivity to neutrons • high cost • rad harness
ADDITIONAL OUCOMES FROM PERFORMED TESTS:
32 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
RD52 Fiber Dual Readout Calorimetry;
33 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
DRC fiber calorimeters
Texas Tech Uni
INFN Pavia
2003
DREAM
2012
RD52
Copper 2m long, 16.2 cm wide 19 towers, each 2 PMT
Copper, 2 modules
Lead, 9 modules
INFN Pisa
2012
RD52
Each module: 9.3 * 9.3 * 250 cm3 (10 λint) Fibers: 1024 S + 1024 C, 8 PMT Sampling fraction: 4.5, 5%
Sampling fraction: 2%
34 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Pb 3*3 matrix
2 Cu modules
Detailed results next week: Sehwook Lee, Michele Cascella
RD52 fiber prototypes
35 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Em performance RD52 Cu calo
Em performance strongly improved with the new RD52 Cu-fiber prototype. Better sampling fraction
DREAM DREAM
Cu-fiber RD52 Cu-fiber RD52
NIM A 735 (2014) 130
36 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Em performance RD52 Cu calo
At small angles: ~ 16% / sqrtE + 1% Constant term due to fluctuation in interaction point (only S) Disappears for angles >
Another advantage of new wrt old dream structure: C and S independent, sample different parts of the, possible to add the two signals Improvement in resolution (doubled sampling fraction) if combining C and S independent signals
DREAM RD52
NIM A 735 (2014) 130
37 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Small-angle em performance (Cu)
Fluctuations on different impact point
Em showers very narrow at the beginning; Sampling fraction depends on the impact point (fiber or dead material) If particles enter at an angle the dependence disappears
Effect NOT seen in Cherenkov signals since early part of the shower do not contribute to the signal (outside numerical aperture C fibers)
NIM 808 (2016) 41
20 GeV e
S, C: sample INDEPENDENTLY the em showers We can sum their contributions em energy resolution improves
by a factor √2
Estimated Cherenkov l.y. > 30 p.e./GeV
38 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
e/pi separation in the Pb RD52
longitudinally unsegmented calorimeter NIM 735 (2014) 120
With combination of cuts: Electron ID efficiency: 99.8%, pion mis-ID < 0.2%
39 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Crucial features:
NO longitudinal segmentation
• compact construction • No intercalibration between sectors • Easily calibrate with electrons
Good (<ns) time structure reconstruction
To measure interaction depth (Used CAEN DRS 32 channels chip, 200 ps time reso, see M. Cascella talk next week)
40 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Construction of the RD52 fiber prototypes
41 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Choice of the RD52 fiber calorimeters
components Scintillating fibers : doped SCSF-78, (produced by Kuraray) + YELLOW filter to eliminate effect of self absorption in the short wavelength region (λatt >5m)
42 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Choice of the RD52 fiber calorimeters
components Scintillating fibers : doped SCSF-78, (produced by Kuraray) + YELLOW filter to eliminate effect of self absorption in the short wavelength region (λatt >5m)
Cherenkov fibers : PMMA based SK40 (produced by Mitsubishi), measured λatt ~ 6m. Good numerical aperture Aluminized front end (in only one Cu prototype). With Sputtering, at Fermilab.
• more C light, • more uniform response as a function of interaction depth • With precise time information, possible to know the interaction depth
43 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Choice of the RD52 fiber calorimeters
components Scintillating fibers : doped SCSF-78, (produced by Kuraray) + YELLOW filter to eliminate effect of self absorption in the short wavelength region (λatt >5m)
Cherenkov fibers : PMMA based SK40 (produced by Mitsubishi), measured λatt ~ 6m. Good numerical aperture Aluminized front end (in only one Cu prototype). With Sputtering, at Fermilab.
• more C light, • more uniform response as a function of interaction depth • With precise time information, possible to know the interaction depth
Phototubes: Hamamatsu R8900, a 10-stage, super-bi alkali photocathode , 21 mm size of active area. • Largest possible ratio (85%)between
the photocathode surface and the total surface to minimize dead zones between towers;
• Squared section cathode to have the best fiber packing
44 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Super bi alkali Photocathodes
High Quantum efficiency in the low frequency region
45 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Measurement of fiber absorption
Measurement done at the INFN Pisa (F. Scuri)
Transmission Loss
SK 40 less loss in the UV region
46 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Pb – fiber construction (INFN Pavia)
Pb fabrication: Cold extrusion (industry, Italy), both sides. Assembling in INFN Pavia, no glue used
Front face
rear face
47 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Pb – fiber construction (INFN Pavia)
48 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Cu – fiber construction (INFN Pisa)
Cu fabrication: Saw scraping (INFN Pisa ) on one side (tried both sides but more complicated alignment, stacking …)
Water cooling
Saw scraping
Assembling, pressure for gluing ~ same assembling technique as PAVIA but with glue
49 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Toward industrial Cu production
We have investigated many techniques in order to make grooves in Cu:
50 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Toward industrial Cu production
NOT recommended by experts
We have investigated many techniques in order to make grooves in Cu:
• Extrusion (technique used for RD52 Pb, and for DREAM, not easy for RD52 Cu pattern) not possible with this pattern, because aspect ratio and Cu too hard Trials done in AMES lab (USA), not good depth control, risk to break the mask
51 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Toward industrial Cu production
We have investigated many techniques in order to make grooves in Cu:
• Extrusion (technique used for RD52 Pb, and for DREAM, not easy for RD52 Cu pattern) not possible with this pattern, because aspect ratio and Cu too hard Trials done in AMES lab (USA), not good depth control
• Rolling not enough precision obtained Impossible with one face pattern Somehow done for two sides pattern but not good uniformity
Tecnique used for KLOE Pb fiber calorimeter production
52 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Toward industrial Cu production
We have investigated many techniques in order to make grooves in Cu:
• Extrusion (technique used for RD52 Pb, and for DREAM, not easy for RD52 Cu pattern) not possible with this pattern, because aspect ratio and Cu too hard Trials done in AMES lab (USA), not good depth control
• Rolling not enough precision obtained Impossible with one face pattern Somehow done for two sides pattern but but not good uniformity
• Saw scraping with rotating calibrated disks (like PISA prototype) time consuming for big production
53 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Toward industrial Cu production
We have investigated many techniques in order to make grooves in Cu:
• Extrusion (technique used for RD52 Pb, and for DREAM, not easy for RD52 Cu pattern) not possible with this pattern, because aspect ratio and Cu too hard Trials done in AMES lab (USA), not good depth control
• Rolling not enough precision obtained Impossible with one face pattern Somehow done for two sides pattern but but not good uniformity
• Saw scraping with rotating calibrated disks (like PISA prototype) time consuming for big production
• Water jet
• Chemical milling
+ Final rolling for fine adjustments
PROMIZING, INDUSTRIALLY COMPATIBLE
54 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Water jet grooving
First trial done in Iowa (water + garnet), still need to be characterized (AMES lab), but seems promising.
Additional rolling to smooth the surface and remove irregularities.
Rolling mask (AMES lab)
Nominal pressure: 4000 Atm. Trials done reducing the pressure and changing the speed
Industrial compatible
55 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Chemical milling
Results from the very first trial (Photolithography technique, CERN PCB lab).
First need fine tuning required to obtain the final depth (mask width, etching time)
Industrial compatible
56 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Chemical milling vs saw scraping
57 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Conclusions
What we learned from the RD52 experience …
And what need to be done for a real calorimeter experiment
(my personal point of view..)
58 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
From RD52 fiber prototypes
to a 4π calorimeter Best solution found: Copper Dual Readout (em + had) fiber calorimeter , high fiber filling fraction, not longitudinally segmented, read out with fast electronics (< ns).
59 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
From RD52 fiber prototypes
to a 4π calorimeter
Suggestions on what needs to be done.. • Projective geometry (NIM A337 ( 1994) 326- 341)
Best solution found: Copper Dual Readout (em + had) fiber calorimeter , high fiber filling fraction, not longitudinally segmented, read out with fast electronics (< ns).
60 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
From RD52 fiber prototypes
to a 4π calorimeter
Suggestions on what needs to be done.. • Projective geometry (NIM A337 ( 1994) 326- 341)
• Use of SiPm two advantages: • Get rid of the “fiber forest”, readout closer to the end face • transversal segmentation as small as needed
Best solution found: Copper Dual Readout (em + had) fiber calorimeter , high fiber filling fraction, not longitudinally segmented, read out with fast electronics (< ns).
Fiber bunches + PMT SiPM matrix directly coupled to end of detector
61 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
From RD52 fiber prototypes
to a 4π calorimeter
Suggestions on what needs to be done.. • Projective geometry (NIM A337 ( 1994) 326- 341)
• Use of SiPm two advantages: • Get rid of the “fiber forest”, readout closer to the end face • transversal segmentation as small as needed
• Rad hardness Cherenkov clear fibers (Cherenkov l.y. could become worse .. in case use quarts, but more expensive)
Best solution found: Copper Dual Readout (em + had) fiber calorimeter , high fiber filling fraction, not longitudinally segmented, read out with fast electronics (< ns).
Fiber bunches + PMT SiPM matrix directly coupled to end of detector
62 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
From RD52 fiber prototypes
to a 4π calorimeter
Suggestions on what needs to be done.. • Projective geometry (NIM A337 ( 1994) 326- 341)
• Use of SiPm two advantages: • Get rid of the “fiber forest”, readout closer to the end face • transversal segmentation as small as needed
• Rad hardness Cherenkov clear fibers (Cherenkov l.y. could become worse .. in case use quarts, but more expensive)
• Industrial production of grooved Copper
• Custom fast electronics • …
Best solution found: Copper Dual Readout (em + had) fiber calorimeter , high fiber filling fraction, not longitudinally segmented, read out with fast electronics (< ns).
Fiber bunches + PMT SiPM matrix directly coupled to end of detector
63 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Backup slides
64 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Calor 2010, Mark Thomson
Calorimetry for future electron colliders
65 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
66 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
v
v
v
v
67 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Time structure, neutron component
Comparison signal shape leakage counters (average signal)
Prompt charged shower particles escaping the calorimeter
Signal produced by recoiled protons from elastic neutron scattering time constant 10-20 ns
Sensitivity to the neutrons Possible to improve resolution
Leakage counters Shower max
40GeV pi
68 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Calorimeter response
R. Wigmans, SPSC report
69 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
70 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
71 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Original DREAM module
72 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
73 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Polarization
74 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
75 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Electrons in BGO matrix
Crystal matrixes em energy resolution
Electrons in 0.3% Mo-PWO
76 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
77 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
78 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Aluminized front end C fibers
79 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
80 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
81 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Why Copper rather than lead?
82 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
83 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
84 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Time structure (1) Average Cherenkov signal (40 GeV mixed beam) from tower around the beam axis
Particle ID possibility in longitudinally unsegmented detector.
Depth shower max ~ 5cm
Depth shower max ~ 25cm
Average depth light production ~125 cm
Shower max
40GeV mixed beam
PMT Calo
μ π e
85 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Em performance RD52 Cu calo
Comparison with other fiber calorimeters. For E > 20 GeV already the best energy resolution even at smaller angles Expected improvement for bigger angles
Best performance for E >20 GeV
For E < 20 GeV fiber to fiber disuniformities play a role; needed better fiber polishing, light mixers before PMT. Not affecting hadronic performance because large number of fiber contributing to hadronic signals
86 S
. Franch
ino – Dual R
ead
out Calorim
etry – H
.E.P,@
IA
S. H
ong Kong 2
016
Hadronic E reso
Monte Carlo simulations DREAM method simulated with GEANT4 2015: Repeated some of these simulations with high precision version of had. showers (neutrons followed in details)
Goal for future e+e- accelerators
W/Z hadronic decay separation, high precision GEANT4 full-size Cu RD52
Nucl. Instr. Meth. A762 (2014) 100