Click here to load reader

High level management theory (final report) 103-1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1. How Should a Ph.D. View TheProspective of Theory and PerformCourse: The Case study of AdvancedManagement TheoryProfessor: Yender McLeePresented by Bing-Hung, Steven, Chou2014/Oct/02Theory Accurately?

2. AgendaWhen Knowledge Wins: Transcending The Sense & Nonsense ofAcademic RankingsAbstractIn the Spirit of ScholarshipAbstractWhat Theory is NotAbstract Contents & DiscussionEditors Comments: Publishing TheoryRecommendations & CautionsPaper IdeaDirection & Comments 3. When Knowledge Wins: Transcending theSense & Nonsense of AcademicRankingsAbstractNot everything that can be counted counts, andnot everything that counts can be counted. AlbertEinsteinQuestionsto SocietyScholarlyContributionAcademicAssessment SystemsUniversityScholarship 4. In the Spirit of ScholarshipAbstractManagement ScholarshipLack of relevanceDysfunction with publication-based scholarly competitionArgumentJust a lack of awareness of the nature of scholarshipThe discipline & dedication excel every bit of the humanspiritThe Olympic Games 5. What Theory is NotAbstractFive-element parts of an article are not theoryReferencesDataVariablesDiagramsHypothesesFacilitate the publication of stronger theoryTest theory: Part v.s. AllUse data: Illustrative v.s. Definitive 6. What Theory is NotReferences / CitationsPurposesHelp set the stage for new conceptual argumentsMisconceptionLike a smoke screen to hide the absence of theoryWe dont understand the phenomenon in questionThe more, the betterA book which people praise but dont read. MarkTwainLinkageExplicit concepts and causal arguments adopted from citessourcesLink to testing or developing theory 7. What Theory is NotDataPurposeShow empirical patterns and evidenceProvide useful support for a theoryMisconceptionTo motivate hypothesesTo substitute for causal reasoningThe data do not generate theory, only researchersdo that. Minzburg (1979) 8. What Theory is NotDataA typical false exampleBrute empiricismThe qualityof worklifeof unionizedworkerCollectivebargainingprocessUnionmanagementcontractUnionmanagementrelationsUnion strengthWagesatisfaction & jobsecurityIncrease joiningjob-relateddecisionContribute tounionization ofteachers andprofessionals 9. What Theory is NotList of VariablesPurposeRepresent a logical attempt to cover determinants of agiven outcomePredictors or controls in multiple regression equations orLISREL modelsMisconceptionTo make a theoretical argumentTo explain WHY a set of those are expected to be strongpredictors 10. What Theory is NotDiagrams / FiguresPurposeA useful aid in building theoryCausal relationships in a logical orderingA chain of causationIntervention of variablesRelationship moderationMisconceptionTo explain WHY the proposed connections will be observedTo substitute text about the reasonsLogical explanations are required 11. What Theory is NotHypotheses / PredictionsPurposeCritical bridge between theory and dataOperationalize the variables and relationship following froma logical argumentExplain WHAT is expected to occurMisconceptionTo explain WHY empirical relationships will occurThe more, the betterWeak arguments 12. What Theory is NotA good theory explains, predicts, and delights. Weick (1995)TheoryThe answer to queries of WHYStrong theory1 or 2 core conceptual statementsBuild a logically detailed caseSimplicity and interconnectedness 13. What Theory is NotThe case against theoryJohn Van Maanen (1989)More descriptive narratives about organization life, basedon intensive ethnographic workThomas CookIsolate a few successful change effort, but not realize thecausal nuances underlying any particular outcomeKuhn (1970)Meta-analysis view the mission of social science to be anaccumulation of empirical findings rather than ebb and flowof theoretical paradigm 14. What Theory is NotRecommendationsJournalsTheory building (Qualitative) v.s. Theory Testing(Quantitative)Rebalance the selection process between theory andmethodNot overweighting the theoretical criteria for qualitativepapersNot underweighting the theoretical contributions ofquantitative researchLowtheorybut HighmethodHightheory &HighmethodLowtheory &LowmethodHightheorybut LowmethodX-axis:TheoryY-axis:Method 15. What Theory is NotConclusionsBalance the theoretical and empirical sides ofresearchWould the evidence provided by Freud, Marx, orDarwin meet the empirical standards of the topjournals in organization research?Would their work be rejected outright or be giventhe chance to go through several rounds of revision? 16. Editors Comments: PublishingTheoryRecommendationsOffer big ideasGive ideas structureCritique & reviseCautionsDont copyDont LengthenDont follow a recipeDont Personalize your critiqueDont mistake your audience 17. Editors Comments: PublishingTheoryOffer big ideasWhat is my big idea?Expertise / ExperiencesInfluential theories derive from the observation of real-lifephenomena, not from scholars struggling to find holes inthe literature Donald Hambrick (1984)New theory can be intuited through an intellectual loveof the objects of experience Albert Einstein (1959)MotivationsInteresting problems 18. Editors Comments: PublishingTheoryGive ideas structureOutline argument & its relationship to existing ideasDavis (1971)A good beginning, a good middle and a good endContribute to theory and relevant to management andorganizationsA seamless flow of ideasHighlight what is interesting and different by existingliterature 19. Editors Comments: PublishingTheoryCritique and ReviseComments from expert reviewersConferences and formal audiencesDaryl Bem (1995)Begin and end the paper with a strong statement of therelevance of your ideas to important problems that humanbeings care about. 20. Editors Comments: PublishingTheoryDont copyDont plagiarize the work of others and that ofyourself either.Dont lengthenExtraneous citations dont improve the theory valueof your paper.Proper stepsBuild originaltheoryAdd value toexistingideasPush forwardunexploredquestionsChallengeconventionalthinking 21. Editors Comments: PublishingTheoryDont follow a recipeProposition& Figure TheorydevelopmentDont personalize your critiqueNo personal attack on specific peopleCritiquing theory is insufficient to count as ascientific advanceDont mistake your audiencePublish papers to correct academy journals 22. Paper IdeaQualitativeorQuantitativeMethodologyFieldGoal of Research 23. ReferencesWhen Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense &Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009) Nancy J. Adler,Anne-Wil HarzingIn the Spirit of Scholarship (2010) Mike W. Peng, GregoryG. DessWhat Theory is Not (1995) Robert I. Sutton, Barry M. StawEditor Comments: Publishing Theory (2006) M. KilduffGoogle Scholarhttp://scholar.google.com.tw/Googlehttps://www.google.com.twSlidesharehttp://www.slideshare.net/Wikipediahttp://www.wikipedia.org/