Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HCERES evaluation of Laboratoires de la vallée d’ rsay
Neutrino Physics Speaker : A. Giuliani On behalf of the neutrino physics group
CSNSM IMNC
IPNO LAL LPT
15 january 2019
SuperNEMO SoLid CUPID-Mo
The physics cases
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 2
Neutrinos have shown to be an essential probe of new physics beyond the Standard Model
Very successful description of oscillation phenomena with a three flavor / mass state model
Neutrinos mix and at least two states are massive
Great success but many open questions: Why lepton mixing is so different from quark mixing? Is the mass ordering normal or inverted? What is the value of the phase δ in UPMNS? → CP violation What is the ν mass scale? Why are neutrinos so light? Are neutrinos equal to antineutrinos? (Majorana/Dirac)
Neutrinoless double beta decay (0ν2β)
Long-baseline neutrino oscillations
The physics cases
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 3
Beyond the three-state model: Are there other massive neutrino states? Are there non-standard neutrino interactions? Does neutrino have a magnetic moment?
Search for sterile neutrinos
Detection and study of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CENNS)
In the laboratories of the Orsay’s valley, there are projects – well-established or under discussion – which address most of the unknowns in neutrino phsyics.
List of experiments/activities and laboratories
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 4
SuperNEMO (LAL)
CUPID (CSNSM, LAL)
SoLid (LAL)
XENON (0ν2β) (LAL)
Established activities in Orsay:
Starting or future activities in Orsay:
DUNE (LAL, IPNO)
RICOCHET (CSNSM)
JUNO (LAL)
LiquidO R&D (LAL)
Neutrinoless double beta decay (0ν2β) Neutrino nature (Dirac or Majorana?)
Neutrino mass scale
Sterile neutrinos Non-standard neutrino properties
CP violation (phase δ in UPMNS)
Mass ordering: sign of ∆m322
Precision measurements of UPMNS and weak-interaction parameters
Supernova- and geo-neutrinos
Human resources (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 5
7 PhD theses defended 6 PhD theses started 9.2 PostDoc × y
TOTAL staff: 62.2 FTE × y C/EC: 26.6 FTE × y ITA: 35.6 FTE × y
SuperNEMO*+CUPID**+SoLid
* * LUMINEU+CUORE+ CUPID-Mo+CROSS
* NEMO-3 + SuperNEMO demonstrator
Breakdown per activity Staff
10 PhD students in total (5 Women + 5 Men)
Financial support (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 6
885 k€ (average 177 k€/y) of which: 623 k€: Equipment / Consumables 262 k€: Missions (∼ 4.2 k€ / (FTE y) )
TOTAL: Main funding sources: SuperNEMO: IN2P3 – LAL CUPID: ANR (LUMINEU, CLYMENE) – ERC (CROSS) – CSNSM SoLid: LAL – IN2P3 – ANR (SoLid)
SuperNEMO+CUPID+SoLid Breakdown per activity
Publications and conferences (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 7
Articles in refereed journals
SuperNEMO CUPID SoLid
SuperNEMO: 13
13
31
3 Articles in conference proceedings
45
47
5 presentations at GDR neutrino
Presentations in international conferences
16 oral presentations (5 invited reviews on 0ν2β) 10 posters
Prizes, Honors and ERC
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 8
Mathieu Bongrand (LAL): médaille de bronze CNRS in 2014
Laurent Simard (LAL): member of IUF Junior during 2013-2018
Andrea Giuliani (CSNSM): ERC Advanced Grant 2016 CROSS – Cryogenic Rare-event Observatory with Surface Sensitivity Fedor Danevich (KINR-Kyiv): Senior Chaire d’Excellence « Jean
d’Alembert » (Université Paris-Saclay) at CSNSM
Teaching activities + Outreach
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 9
University course lectures: • mathématiques en L3/Magistère 1ère année de physique fondamentale • option techniques expérimentales à l'agrégation • electromagnétisme en classe préparatoire l'Essouriau/Paris Sud de 2015 à 2018 • préparation à l'épreuve de TIPE en classe préparatoire l'Essouriau/Paris Sud de 2015 à 2018 • Travaux pratiques de L1 de physique nucléaire de 2011 à 2014 Erasmus and stages • Three Erasmus-program stages have been performed in collaboration with foreign Universities • Two L3 stages (2014) Schools and training • école d’été TES-HEP de 2012-2014 • école de Gif sur la physique des neutrinos à basse énergie en 2016 • Rencontres de l’infiniment grand à l’infiniment petit en 2017 • training entitled "Du détecteur à la mesure" of IN2P3: Détecteurs bolométriques refroidis: principes et applications : 2013 – 2015 – 2018 • school Détection de Rayonnement à Très Basse Température, Aussois, 2018 Outreach Participation to « la fête de la science », construction and operation of a cloud chamber (LAL, 2017)
Achievements – NEMO -SuperNEMO
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 11
Main isotope : 100Mo, 34.3 kg.y : T1/2(0ν2β) > 1.1 1024 y (90% CL) <mν> < [0.33-0.62] eV No event in [3.2-10] MeV for 47 kg.y -> promising for 96Zr, 150Nd
Search for exotic processes : 0ν4β, Lorentz violation, bosonic neutrino…
Searching for 0ν2β Precise measurement of the full kinematics of the 2ν2β : test of nuclear models
SuperNEMO demonstrator Half-detector (tracker, calorimeter)
Commissioning : 1st half 2017
Closure of the detector : November 2018
NEMO-3
Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 111101 Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 072011 [Editor’s sugg.] Eur. Phys. J. C. (2018) 78:821 Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 012007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 062504 Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 072003 [Editor’s sugg.] Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 041801 [Editor’s sugg.] Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 112008 [cover picture]
Achievements – CUPID
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 12
Reject α’s (main background source in CUORE) by detecting the feeble Cherenkov light emitted by β’s → α’s are below the Cherenkov threshold (LSM)
Phys. Rev. C 97, 032501(R) (2018)
Light-heat scatter plot
Cherenkov-light detection in TeO2 bolometers (CUPID-Te)
CUPID-0
Limit: T0ν1/2[82Se] > 2.4×2024 y
(the best ever achieved on 82Se)
PRL 120, 232502 (2018)
Pilot experiment with ZnSe scintillating bolometers to study
0ν2β of 82Se (LNGS, Italy)
Succesful development of the Li2100MoO4 technology to search for 0ν2β of 100Mo
In May 2018, the CUORE collaboration selects the Li2100MoO4
technology as a baseline for the next-generation 0ν2β search CUPID
LUMINEU – CUPID-Mo
Prototypes and CUPID-Mo demonstrator (LSM)
EPJC 77, 785 (2017) [cover picture]
Achievements – SoLid
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 13
Demonstrated neutron PID
Proved background rejection thanks to the fine segmentation (5 cm)
Search for sterile neutrino at BR2 reactor with a 288 kg target prototype
5.5 m from 60 MW nuclear core
Anti-neutrinos detected through inverse beta decay (IBD)
2018 J. Inst. 13 P05005
Energy resolution 20 % @ 1 MeV
SM1 prototype
1600 kg – 12800 PVT cubes 2 6LiFZnS/cube - 3200 fibers + SiPMs
Phase 1 detector: construction and characterization
LY > 60 PE/MeV Energy resolution 12 %
Very good uniformity Energy linearity behaviour confirmed
Compton edge 22Na spectrum
Neutron detection efficiency > 65 %
First IBD-like events Detector installed at BR2
in November 2017 Commissioning end of 2017
Stable running since April 2018
Reactor ON-OFF transition for IBD-like
CUPID
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 15
Baseline option for CUPID: Li2100MoO4 scintillating bolometers (see Achievements) 130TeO2 Cherenkov bolometers → viable backup solution (see Achievement )
CUPID (CUORE Upgrade with Particle ID) is a proposed 0ν2β bolometric experiment exploiting the CUORE infrastructure (LNGS) and with a background 100 times lower at the ROI
CUPID « pre-collaboration » ∼150 physicists/engineers
7 countries (Italy, US, France,…) Leading roles from CSNSM/LAL
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Demonstrators CDR
(under writing) TDR
Enrichment Crystallization Construction
Stop CUORE
CUPID Phase 1 ∼100 kg 100Mo
CUPID Phase 2 ∼300 kg 100Mo
Sensitivity to Majorana neutrino mass: 7 – 19 meV
Next general CUPID meeting: LAL, 6-7 March 2019
Uniquely favorable position when compared to other next-generation searches
Infrastructure exists + detector R&D completed
SoLid
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 16
Experiment goals: - Baseline 6-9 m - Thermal power 60 MWth - Detector dimensions 0.8x0.8x2.5 m3
- Detector mass 1600 kg - Energy resolution 14 % @ 1 MeV - IBD efficiency 30 % - Signal to background 3:1 - Background spectrum taken from SM1
Reactor anomaly best fit can be excluded in 1 year
3 years of data taking to reach target sensitivity
5 reactor ON cycles already on tape for 2018
Measurement of 235U antineutrino
energy spectrum for Reactor shape anomaly
Results by Summer
Longer term after SoLid: interest in LiquidO R&D or joining JUNO experiment
XENON
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 17
0νββ of 136Xe
• Very good energy resolution for scintillator based experiments (1.5% σ)
Background dominated by 228Th from materials and 214Bi from 222Rn
XENON Preliminary
XENON Preliminary
XENON Preliminary
Main research topic: Dark Matter
International collaboration with US leadership Experiment in LNGS
DUNE
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 18
Mechanical implication for the design and the installation of the 240 « chimneys » of the dual phase module of DUNE. Interest : possibility to change the front-end electronics without contaminating the liquid Argon Design studies in 2019 Prototype built at LAL in Spring 2019 Contribution to the writing of the TDR : mid- 2019 Installation of the chimneys at Nusag in 2024 Start of data taking in 2026 : CP violation in the ν sector, ν mass hierarchy, ν from supernovae, proton decay… Possible participation to the data analysis of ProtoDune (under discussion), and of the DUNE detector
Also: proton decay
Leading-edge international experiment for neutrino science
at Homestake, US
RICOCHET
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 19
Coherent Elastic ν-Nucleus Scattering (CENNS)
Cross section ∝ (neutron number)2
Largest ν cross section at low energies by some oders of magnitude
No energy threshold
Change of paradigm in ν physics: • From tonne-scale to kg-scale targets • From discovery to high precision
Flavour independent
RICOCHET (US, France,…)
Sub-100 eV CENNS measurement at a nuclear reactor
New physics signatures call for very low-energy thresholds
(O(10 eV))
• Nuclear site finalized by end-2019 • 1 kg array → 27 crystals of 30 g • Nuclear recoil identification • Data taking in 2022
Strong synergy with EDELWEISS
IPNL 32 g Ge detector +
high impedance meander NbSi TES
σ(baseline) ∼ 65 eV
Prptotype with outstanding performance
Detector development at CSNSM
JUNO
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 20
Also: proton decay
New researcher from APC
with Post-Doc and
PhD student
Mid long-term strategy
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 22
→ CUPID
→ JUNO → DUNE
→ Ricochet SoLid
Search for 0ν2β
ν’s from artificial
and natural sources
→ Liquid0
→ DARWIN
Two research lines emerge from the current activities
SuperNEMO CUPID-Mo
SWOT analysis
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 23
STRENGTHS • CUPID-Mo technology is well-established and very
promising in terms of background and energy resolution.
• SuperNEMO technology is the only one that can provide full 0ν2β even reconstruction.
• The SoLid group is giving important contributions to the experiment in good synergy with the SuperNEMO one.
• Capability to attract funds beyond IN2P3 support (ANR, ERC, Labex).
OPPORTUNITIES • Participation to CUPID with major roles in the collaboration. • Merging of the local 0ν2β community. • Exploit synergies between 0ν2β and dark matter (XENON,
bolometers). • Exploit bolometric expertise to push RICOCHET (Coherent
Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus scattering). • Participation to key projects in neutrino-oscillation physics
(JUNO, DUNE). • Possibility of a far reaching strategy in neutrino phsyics
WEAKNESSES • The bolometric technology depends on challenging
cryogenics. • The SuperNEMO technology is difficult to
extrapolate to large masses.
THREATS • The neutrino physics group is largely undersized with respect
to its engagements and ambitions. • Unclear funding prospects, with strong dependence on non-
reproducible / non-predictable sources. • Lack of support to CUPID in France can undermine the
prominent role and unique expertise of the local CUPID group.
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 25
Approximative estimation of the man-power -2018/2019
Human resources (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 26
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Research/teaching staff (C/EC) Technical staff (ITA) FTE
SuperNEMO*+CUPID**+SoLid
* * LUMINEU+CUORE+CUPID+CROSS C/EC: 26.6 FTE × y
ITA: 35.6 FTE × y
7 PhD theses defended
6 PhD theses started
9.2 PostDoc × y
TOTAL: 62.2 FTE × y * NEMO-3+SuperNEMO demomstrator
Human resources (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 27
FTE × y
C/EC
ITA
PhD students
PostDoc
Breakdown per activity
SuperNEMO 51.15 FTE × y
CUPID 26 FTE × y
SoLid 9.3 FTE × y
Human resources (2014 – 2017)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 28
FTE
FTE FTE
SuperNEMO
CUPID SoLid
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Research/teaching staff (C/EC)
Technical staff (ITA)
PhD students
PostDocs
PhD Theses
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 29
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Guillaume Eurin
Steven Calvez
Delphine Boursette
Cloé Girard Carillo
Noë Roy
Hawraa Khalife
Valentina Novati
Michele Mancuso
Dmitry Chernyak
Margherita Tenconi
CUPID
SuperNEMO
SoLid
W M (5) (5)
Financial support (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 30
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
k€ Equipment / Consumables Missions
885 k€ (average 177 k€/y)
of which: 623 k€: Equipment / Consumables 262 k€: Missions (∼ 4.2 k€ / (FTE y) )
TOTAL
Main funding sources: SuperNEMO IN2P3 – LAL
CUPID ANR – ERC – CSNSM SoLid LAL – IN2P3 – ANR
Financial support (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 31
SuperNEMO CUPID SoLid
k€
SuperNEMO: 426 k€
CUPID: 342 k€
SoLid: 117 k€
Breakdown per activity
Funding sources
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 32
IN2P3 (flagship project for 0ν2β)
ANR
LAL
CSNSM ERC
SuperNEMO
CUPID
SoLid LAL
ANR IN2P3
ASPERA
LUMINEU (2012-2017) coordinated by CSNSM CLYMENE (2016-2020)
ISOTTA (2012-2014)
CROSS – ERC Advanced Grant (2018-2022)
SoLid (2017-2019) Other projects P2IO PICS PHC Chaire excellence U-PSUD
Publications
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 33
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Articles in refereed journals
SuperNEMO CUPID SoLid
SuperNEMO: 13
13
31
3
Articles in conference proceedings
45
47
0 5 10 15
PRL PLB EPJC PRC PRD
Articles in high impact factor
journals
Presentations at conferences (2014 – 2018)
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 34
SuperNEMO CUPID SoLid
Presentations in international conferences
Invited (reviews on 0ν2β)
Plenary
Parallel
Posters
16 oral presentations 10 posters
1. A. Giuliani (CSNSM) II International Meeting for Large Neutrino Infrastructures Fermilab, Batavia, US, 20-21 April 2015 2. L. Simard (LAL) 17th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, Russia, 20-26 Aug 2015 3. A. Giuliani (CSNSM) Frontier Objects in Astrophysics and Part.icle Physics Vulcano, Italy, 22-28 May 2016 4. A. Giuliani (CSNSM) NEUTRINO 2018 Heidelberg, Germany, 4-9 June, 2018
4 presentations at GDR neutrino
Teaching activities
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 35
Laurent Simard (LAL) – lectures: mathématiques en L3/Magistère 1ère année de physique fondamentale : 36h de cours/an et 36h de TD/an, de 2017 à 2018 option techniques expérimentales à l'agrégation : 25 h/an de 2014 à 2018 electromagnétisme en classe préparatoire l'Essouriau/Paris Sud de 2015 à 2018 préparation à l'épreuve de TIPE en classe préparatoire l'Essouriau/Paris Sud de 2015 à 2018 Mathieu Bongrand (LAL) – lectures: 3x3 h à l’école d’été TES-HEP de 2012-2014 4 h à l’école de Gif sur la physique des neutrinos à basse énergie en 2016 1 h aux rencontres de l’infiniment grand à l’infiniment petit en 2017 Travaux pratiques de L1 de physique nucléaire de 2011 à 2014 (30 h/an) Pierre de Marcillac (CSNSM) – lectures: Lectures in the framework of the formation entitled "Du détecteur à la mesure" of IN2P3 for engineers and doctors: Détecteurs bolométriques refroidis: principes et applications (3h): 2013 – 2015 – 2018 Emiliano Olivieri, Denys Poda (CSNSM) – lectures: Lectures in the framework of the school « Détection de Rayonnement à Très Basse Température », Aussois, 2018 Andrea Giuliani (CSNSM) – supervision of stagiaires: Three Erasmus-program stages have been performed in collaboration with foreign Universities (2015 – 2016 – 2018) Two L3 stages (2014)
Achievement 1 - NEMO-3
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 36
Main isotope : 100Mo, 34.3 kg.y : T1/2(0ν2β) > 1.1 1024 y (90% CL) <mν> < [0.33-0.62] eV No event in [3.2-10] MeV for 47 kg.y -> promising for 96Zr, 150Nd
Searching for 0ν2β, but not only
Precise measurement of the full kinematics of the 2ν2β : test of nuclear models
Search for exotic processes : 0ν4β, Lorentz violation,
bosonic neutrino…
Achievement 2 - NEMO-3
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 37
Isotope 0ν2β, Majoron n=1 2ν2β Majoron n= 2,3,7 Exotic :Lorentz violation,
Bosonic neutrino
Quadruple beta decay
100Mo Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 111101 Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015)
072011[Editor’s suggestion]
Under preparation -
82Se Eur. Phys. J. C. (2018) 78:821 - 116Cd Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 012007 - 130Te Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 062504 - 150Nd Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 072003 [Editor’s suggestion] Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 041801
[Editor’s suggestion] 96Zr 48Ca Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 112008
[cover picture]
Achievement 3 - SuperNEMO demonstrator
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 38
Calorimeter at LSM : end 2015-> mid 2016 Half-detector (tracker, calorimeter) comissioning : 1st half 2017
Achievement 4 - SuperNEMO demonstrator
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 39
End of the sources making : october 2017 (6.23 kg 82Se)
Measurement of the sources radiopurity
by the BiPo-3 detector (Canfranc)
Closure of the detector : November 2018
Achievement 5 – α rejection in TeO2 bolometers
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 40
Reject α’s (main background source in CUORE) by detecting the feeble Cherenkov light emitted by β’s → α’s are below the Cherenkov threshold
Neganov-Luke-amplified light detector
Phys. Rev. C 97, 032501(R) (2018)
Full rejection of α background in a TeO2 bolometer for the study of 0ν2β of 130Te (2017)
TeO2 780 g crystal
This result keeps open the path for a Te-based CUPID (follow-up of CUORE), even if as a back-up solution
Light-heat scatter plot
Achievement 6 – CUPID-0: ZnSe bolometers
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 41
Pilot experiment with ZnSe scintillating bolometers to study 0ν2β of 82Se (CUPID-0) (2017) 26 bolometers (24 enriched + 2 natural ) arranged in 5 towers Experiment installed in Gran Sasso (Italy)
Total calibration spectrum
Limit: T0ν1/2[82Se] > 2.4×2024 y (the best ever achieved on 82Se)
PRL 120, 232502 (2018)
Light-detector wafers prepared at CSNSM
Achievement 7 – Lithium molybdate technology
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 42
Multiple tests with natural and enriched crystals (2014-2017) in LSM and LNGS with outstanding results in terms of:
High-purity crystals → negligible loss of enriched material Reproducibility → excellent performance uniformity Energy resolution → ∼ 4-6 keV FWHM in RoI α/β separation power → > 99.9 % Internal radiopurity → < 5 µBq/kg in 232Th, 238U; < 5 mBq/kg in 40K
Succesful development of the Li2100MoO4 technology (LUMINEU -2017)
EDELWEISS set-up
NIM A 729, 856 (2013) JINST 9, P06004 (2014) EPJC 74, 3133 (2014) JINST 10, P05007 (2015)
In May 2018, the CUORE collaboration selects the Li2100MoO4 technology as a baseline for
the next-generation 0ν2β search CUPID
EPJC 77, 785 (2017) Preliminary high-precision measurement of 2ν2β of 100Mo – EPJC cover (785,11 – 2017)
Achievement 8 – CUPID-Mo
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 43
Commissioning of CUPID-Mo demonstrator in the Modane Underground Laboratory (2018) CUPID-Mo is a pilot experiment with 20 Li2MO4 crystals enriched in 100Mo to study neutrinoless double beta decay of this isotope It is the most important demonstrator towards CUPID
CUPID-Mo sensitivity is 1.3×2024 y on T0ν1/2[100Mo] in 6 months.
Energy resolution in the commissioning run: 4 – 8 keV FWHM; in the total spectrum, 6 keV FWHM.
@2615 keV
baseline
Achievement 9 : SM1 prototype
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 44
2 scintillator types for e+ and n detection of the IBD products
Demonstrated neutron PID
Proved background rejection thanks to the fine segmentation (5 cm)
Search for sterile neutrino at BR2 reactor with a 288 kg target prototype 5.5 m from 60 MW nuclear core Started data taking in 2015 only few days before the long shutdown of BR2 reactor
Anti-neutrinos detected through inverse beta decay (IBD)
16x16 cubes x 9 planes 288 optical fibers + sipms
2018 J. Inst. 13 P05005
Energy resolution 20 % @ 1 MeV
Achievement 10 : SoLid Phase 1 detector
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 45 2018 J. Inst. 13 P09005
French funding: LAL/Subatech/LPC – IN2P3 – ANR more than 1/3 of the total detector cost
Phase 1 detector: 1600 kg – 12800 PVT cubes 2 6LiFZnS/cube 3200 fibers + sipms Cooling at 10 °C to reduce sipm noise Dedicated neutron trigger Construction in Gent Univ 2016-2017
Light yield (LY) of SoLid detector was improved by studies on a dedicated test bench at LAL Factor 2.8 improvement in LY and better uniformity Energy resolution 14 % @ 1 MeV
Achievement 11 : light-yield and quality assurance
15/01/2019 HCERES evaluation – Neutrino Physics 46
Detector construction by planes of 16x16 cubes in Gent
Right after construction complete scan of the plane with gamma (22Na) and neutron (AmBe) sources : - Identify and fix minor construction defects - Early performances and calibrations
ArXiv:1811.05244 - accepted by J. Inst.
22Na calibration head from LAL
LY results better than test bench values > 60 PE/MeV Energy resolution 12 % and very good uniformity Energy linearity behaviour confirmed
Neutron detection efficiency > 65 %
Compton edge 22Na spectrum
Light-yield and neutron efficiency of 12800 cubes
Calipso LPC Caen
Achievement 12 : first IBD like events
15/01/2019 47
Backgrounds being measured and rejection under study
Development of improved reconstruction tools ongoing
Commissioning end of 2017 Early 2018 detector and electronics optimisation
Stable running since April 2018 Intensive calibration campaigns over Summer
Detector installed at BR2 in November 2017 Cooled container at 10 °C for sipm noise Shielding: water, cadmium, polyethylene Participation of LAL to design and construction Calibration and run coordination @ LAL
Thèse de Delphine Boursette 09/2018
Reactor ON-OFF transition for IBD-like