Upload
zurina
View
47
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Harmonising Ex ante poverty impact assessment International Forum on Poverty Reduction On Good Practices 14-15 November 2006 Solveig Buhl, GTZ [email protected]. The new challenges are Harmonization Alignment Accountability Management for Development Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
HarmonisingHarmonisingEx ante poverty impact Ex ante poverty impact
assessmentassessmentInternational Forum on Poverty Reduction
On Good Practices
14-15 November 2006Solveig Buhl, GTZ
A harmonised ex ante Poverty Impact Assessment (PIA) is required
The new challenges are• Harmonization
• Alignment
• Accountability
• Management for Development Results
• Increasing effectiveness
The Task Team within DAC POVNET
• Group founded in 2005 to develop harmonised and easy to use approach to (ex ante) poverty impact assessment
• Participants: DAC/OECD, France, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, UK, Sweden, Switzerland, USA, Ireland, Finland (plus consultations with partner countries)
• Report “Harmonizing ex ante Poverty Impact Assessment” approved by DAC in March 2006 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/44/36573576.pdf
• Pilots by several donors in 2006
• Guide to PIA will be submitted to POVNET in November 2006 and soon be published
Basic properties and level of application
• Can cover most interventions (policy, programmes, projects, NOT budget support)
• Based on existing approaches, e.g. PSIA, capability framework
• Use of existing data and analyses
• Relatively simple, flexible approach, providing 5 modules with matrices
Assess Improvements to
MDGs plus
Assess Enhancement to capabilities
Determine transmission channels
Analyse Institutions & Stakeholders
Determine & Design Interventions
Country Assistance StrategiesNational Strategies / Plans
RESULTS
CHAIN
PIA Modules
5
4
3
2
1
MDGs
Risks
PIA Framework and modules
Information quality and gaps
PIA is a flexible approach
• PIA should be embedded in ongoing planning and appraisal process: can be part of comprehensive planning document or constitute separate report
• PIA can be carried out by interdisciplinary team or as a desk study – should never degenerate into a mere box ticking exercise
• Time needed varies between 2 days and 2-3 weeks
• can also be used - in slightly modified way – for assessment during or after implementation
The improved understanding of the planned interventions serves several purposes
To summarise, PIA allows to • identify interventions with high poverty reduction and
pro-poor growth impact• improve design of proposed intervention• identify existing information and information gaps• identify monitoring needs
• Increased transparency, accountability and dialogue• Reduces burden on partner countries• Clearly in line with Paris Declaration!
Next steps and challenges for the future
• Dissemination of lessons learned and continuous learning
• Up-scaling of the approach • Increased involvement of partner countries • Capacity development
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! For further information
Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Harmonising Ex Ante Poverty Impact Assessment
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/44/36573576.pdf
The Guide to Ex Ante Poverty Impact Assessment will be published soon!
Module 1: Poverty situation and relevance to national strategies and plans
General poverty situation in country / region / area
Existing national strategies / programmes relevant to the intervention
Short description of the intervention and how it aligns to national programmes
Stakeholders / intermediaries
Main Tasks Interests and pro-poor agenda; aspects that might hinder them to have a pro-poor agenda (risks)
Rating
Company India Buy seedlings and produce bio diesel
No particular interest in poverty reduction
0
ICRISAT Capacity Development Research &Development
Mainly interested in developing viable, sustainable agronomic approach, but also interested in poverty reduction
+
International company
TechnologyTransfer
No particular interest in poverty reduction
0
NGOs Organising village level groups to ensureequity
By mandate interested in poverty reduction and equity issues
++
Very negativeNegativeNot significantPositiveVery positive
- --+++Stength/Directionimpact Very negativeNegativeNot significantPositiveVery positive
- --+++Stength/Directionimpact
Module 2: Stakeholder/ Institution Analysis, Example PPP Biofuel
Module 3: Understanding Transmission Channels, example biofuel
Transmission Channels
Transmission Channels
Used
Results by Transmission Channel Categories
Information Sources
Details & Risks Short term Medium term
Details & Risks
Prices + Market might fluctuate
Employment
Transfers
Access +Authority +Assets + +
Very negativeNegativeNot significantPositiveVery positive
- --+++Stength/Directionimpact Very negativeNegativeNot significantPositiveVery positive
- --+++Stength/Directionimpact
Module 4: Outcomes related to capabilities, example biofuel
Outcomes in terms of capabilities
Detail&
risks
Inform-ation
sources
Mitigation or
reinforcing measures
Economic Human Political Socio-cultural
Protective Security
Stake-holderGroups
short term
medium term
shortterm
medium term
short term
medium term
short term
medium term
short term
medium term
Land owning poor (with large proportion of waste land)
+ ++ +
Landless poor
members of SHGs (90% women)
+ +
Module 5: Understand impacts at aggregated level, example biofuel
Strategic Development Goals Impacts Details & Risks
Information Sources
MDG 1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger +
MDG 2. Achieve universal primary education
MDG 3. Promote gender equality empower women
+ If SHG are supported
Interviews with …
MDG 4. Reduce child mortality
MDG 5. Improve maternal health
MDG 6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, other diseases
MDG 7. Ensure environmental sustainability
Pro Poor Growth
Protecting the vulnerable
Peace, Security, Disarmament
Human Rights, democracy and good governance
Protecting the common environment + marginal