H6 Classroom Debate

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 H6 Classroom Debate

    1/2

    H6Classroom Debate

    Classroom debate, in which teams explore arguments for and against a specific proposition, can be an effective and practicalteaching tool. Debating allows several different qualities to emerge, including collecting and organizing ideas, evaluating ideas, seeinglogical connections between ideas, adapting to new situations quickl and efficientl, and speaking persuasivel.

    Language and Delivery in Debate. !ike public speaking, effective debate speaking is clear, well"organized, and informative. #heaudience is a big part of debate, and as the audience is acting as a judgein the debate, the debaters should remember a few additionalrules. #he audience is not like a courtroom $udge, so the debater should not deliver as man facts as possible in a short time. #he debatshould connect the information and present it to the audience as a completed work, not short facts haphazardl glued together. #he

    language used in debate contributes to this completeness b being intelligible, free of $argon and clich%s. Transitionsare the ke to agood debate. Debaters need to give verbal signposts so the audience can follow the outline.Attitude of Speakers. Debate is controversial and controvers often becomes heated. However, tring to attack opponents gains nothinDebaters should show respect for opponents and for the worth of ideas, as well as displaing courtes and fair"mindedness at all times. is not realistic to take a 'right or wrong' attitude toward debate. (peakers should never forget that a good debate is an honest attempt to

    provide the audience)$udge with two different answers to the question asked in the proposition. Debate instructs its participants in theintricate art of effectivel communicating without attacking and alienating others. *lthough the debate framework suggests two mutualexclusive answers, the knowledge and reasoning the debaters present ma suggest possible compromise or collaborate solutions.

    DEBATE FORMATProposition. #he instructor should give the two debating teams a proposition to debate or allow the two teams to agree upon aproposition. #he proposition should take a definite stance on an issue. #he affirmative will support the proposition and the negative teawill den the affirmative+s stance. #he proposition should follow this format -example '/esolved #hat the 0.(. would be $ustified insignificantl increasing trade restrictions.'Order and Time Limits in Debate. #he debate format follows a specific order. #he affirmative team speaks first and last. Classroom

    debate can have one to three members per team. #he following debate format takes 12 minutes to complete." 3st *ffirmative speech -affirmative team member 43""6 mins

    " Cross"examination b negative team member 45"" mins" 3st 7egative speech -negative team member 43""6 mins

    " Cross"examination b affirmative team member 45"" mins" nd *ffirmative speech -affirmative team member 4""6 mins

    " Cross"examination b negative team member 45"" mins" nd 7egative speech -negative team member 4""6 mins

    " Cross"examination b affirmative team member 45"" mins" 7egative rebuttal speech -negative team member 45""1 mins" *ffirmative rebuttal speech -affirmative team member 45""1 mins

    DETAILS OF COMPONENTS1st Affirmative Speech. #he affirmative team supports the resolution. #he 3st affirmative speech is the onl prepared speech in thedebate. #here are four structural elements in building an affirmative debate case. #he elements are

    Proposition-$udgment expressed in a declarative sentenceIssues -assertions that function as basic reasons for adoption of propositionArgument -assertions that are the result of reasoningEvien!e -statement of fact or opinion which makes an assertion acceptable to the audience.

    Eample!Proposition" /esolved #hat the 0.(. would be $ustified in significantl increasing trade restrictions.Issue One" &. 7ational securit considerations would $ustif increasing trade restrictions becauseArgument" *. Highl technical products reach our adversaries.Evien!e" 3. (ecretar of (tate testimon regarding loss of important computer advance to communist world.

    . Defense Department reports on militar equipment sold through third parties.Issue T#o"etc.

    "ross#eamination. #his is the onl point in the debate in which the two teams interact. Cross"examination is the time in which thequestioning team clarifies the opposing team+s case and exposes an weaknesses found in that case. #here are four different tpes ofcross"examination questions

    Dire!t-refers to a specific piece of informationOpen-allows the respondent to amplif ideasProbing-similar to open, but directed at a specific line of reasoningLeaing-series of questions leading to an answer that refutes the whole case

    Eample!Dire!t"8hat is the source for our definition of affirmative action9Open"#ell us wh ou favor affirmative action involved in awarding of scholarships.Probing"8h does the affirmative team depend exclusivel on the federal government report for support of their case9Leaing" Person A"'8hat was our supporting evidence9'

    Person B"'8e cited a stud done b the federal government.'A" '#he government paid for and conducted this research9'

  • 7/25/2019 H6 Classroom Debate

    2/2