Upload
tuyet
View
36
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Italian system for centralised purchasing and electronic procurement. Gustavo Piga – University of Rome Tor Vergata THE NEW PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES AND INSTRUMENTS, Department of Contracts, Malta and OECD/Sigma Valletta, January 26th. The electronic developments in US procurement. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Gustavo Piga – University of Rome Tor Vergata
THE NEW PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES AND INSTRUMENTS,
Department of Contracts, Malta and OECD/Sigma
Valletta, January 26th
The Italian system for centralised The Italian system for centralised purchasing and electronic procurementpurchasing and electronic procurement
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
The electronic developments in US procurement
Survey over 47 US states (1998 vs. 2001)
In Moon (2001), Journal of Public Procurement
Electronic Ordering: from 44,7 to 68,1% of all States;
Purchasing Cards: from 68,1 to 85,1%;
Digital Signature Accepted for Tender Documents: from 0,09% to 14,9%;
Reverse Auction: 10,6% in 2001
E-proc Adoption grows with: Managerial Innovation;
Centralized procurement with a high level of authority;
Size of the State.
Anyway…
It is also true that ICT development has lead public procurement to become more centralized, spending and investing in qualified human resources to manage purchases. Indeed, the new
European Directive introduces both e-proc and central purchasing stations.
Italy is no exception. To the contrary ….
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Total amount of Italian public expenditure for goods and services sums up to about € 100,9 billion, about 15% of overall public spending and 7,7 % of GDP
Rationalization Program on Public Spending Spending for Goods and Services
Central Government17%
Health bodies52%
Local Government
26%
University and other P.A.
5%
Public spending for goods and services, 2003 (%)
CentralGovernment16%
Health bodies42%
LocalGovernment
36%
Public spending for goods and services eligible for the
Program, 2003 (%)
About € 102,3 billion About € 42 billion
University and other P.A.
6%
* Report on needs for the year 2003 and Consip estimate
3.2% of GDP
20% of discount
permanent reduction 0.4% deficit if so desired
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Rationalization Program on Public Spending: the aim of the Program
Define purchasing strategies
Draw up competitive frame contracts for Public Administrations
Promote the use of e-procurement within the Public Administration
Provide purchasing monitoring tools to the Public Administration
Deliver innovative e-procurement models
Service efficiencyand quality
Processsimplification
Cost saving
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
The financial act 2000 (December 23, 1999 n.488) laid down the foundations of the “Rationalization Program for Public Spending on Goods and Services”. Article 26 says:
“ The Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), according to the regulations currently available regarding suppliers selection, draws up frame contracts with providers. Within the frame contract, the selected providers have to accept any order coming from public administrations.”
Rationalization Program on Public Spending
By means of 2 Ministerial Decrees (February 2000, May 2001), the Ministry entrusted Consip S.p.A. with the development and management of the Program.
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Rationalization Program on Public Spending
The following Financial Acts (2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006) streamlined the Program scope and the roles of involved actors.Today, according to the current legal framework:
Frame contracts regard goods and services;
All public administrations (e.g. Central Government, municipalities, health agencies, etc.) may purchase within the frame contracts. Alternatively, whenever they run their own tenders, they have to take price and quality of the frame contracts as a benchmark. 2006 Financial Act has contingency plans in case public finances worsen;
Our tenders affect all purchases of the Public Administration, where a Consip frame contract is available, thanks to the benchmarking effect.
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Consip: Task and structure
Consip is a joint-stock company totally and directly owned by the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), and it operates exclusively to serve Public Administrations
Consip’s operations are carried out through two Divisions:
the DSIT (Treasury Information System Division), with about 300 employees, is in charge of managing the Information System of the Ministry of Economy and Finance;
the DARPA (PA On-line Procurement Division), with about 160 employees, is in charge of implementing the Rationalization Program on Public Spending for goods and services.
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Consip: Task and structure - DARPA
Legal Advice Program
management
eProc Systems(IT Platform
management)
Universities
Sourcing(Purchasing strategies)
Healthcare Admin.
Local Authorities
Central Administrations
Industry 1
Industry 2
Industry n
Puchasers
“Marketing” Purchaser side
“Marketing” Supplier side
eProc Strategies
(Marketplace management)
DARPA
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
E-Procurement tools
www.acquistinretepa.it
ElectronicShops
Purchases within frame contract (through traditional tender or on-line auctions process)
Direct Purchase
e-Marketplace
Purchases below the Eu threshold
Direct Purchase or RFQ
Many to Many approach
Supplier defined eCatalog
Purchase Scope:- Low cost- Highly fragmented
Above and Below EU Threshold Below EU Threshold
When the good has a rapid obsolescence Consip resorts, if possible, to
ONLINE AUCTIONSAutomatic Technical and economic offer evaluation
Development of Frame contract through electronic system
ASP towards other Administrations
Purchase scope: Large volumes Standardized Low price volatility Demand aggregation Slow and High obsolescence
Many to one approach
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
E-Procurement Portal
On-line services
Notices
On-line orders
Marketplace
Tender publication, supplier qualification for Public Marketplace, ....
Opportunity to buy on line using frame contracts conditions
On line access to public Marketplace
Registration Public buyer registration
Specific Market Area
Data and information on “Client market Area” (Central PA, Health bodies, Universities, Municipalities)
Data & News Who we are, what we do, what you can buy, how you can buy, Newsletters, Magazines…
On line auctions On line access to public auctions
Supplier Area Information on e-procurement models, correct way to participate to public tender, ...
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Objectives Strategies
Focus on “state of the art” in supply market Wide range of goods and services Constant assessment of service levels
Direct costs, through: - demand aggregation (economies of scale)- competition among suppliers- product standardization
Indirect costs, through: - on-line bidding and ordering- process simplification- centralization of litigation
To guarantee quality standards in P.A. purchases …
… while reducing
Change Management in the Public Administration Industry dynamics
Sideeffects
Electronic shop Strategy
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Frame contracts : Process simplification
…to the new process of goods and services procurement
Fax / on-lineOrder
... achieving, in addition, administrative procedures reductions for suppliers…
Needs analysis
Goods/ Services delivery
PaymentSupplier selection
Possible litigation
with suppliers
Contract and
tender document
ation
Contract signing
Public Administration activities
From the traditional….
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Electronic shops: Operational model
Contracts reporting
Monitoring tools
NeedsFeedback
Delivery
On-line/fax orderPublic
Administrations
Consip Suppliers
Frame Contracts (public tender)and e-shops activation
Payments
Portal www.acquistinretepa.it
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Electronic shops: Operational model
E-shops represent an open window on the web in which goods and services selected through tenders and frame contracts are available to PA procurement offices registered to the Program
Product Product selection selection
and online and online orderingordering
Traditional Traditional and and
electronic electronic tenderstenders
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Frame Contracts: Some examples of unit cost reduction
70 signed frame contracts and more than 40 product categories by 31/12/05
20% 20%
averageaverage
savingsaving
Goods
Utilities
TLC
Rental Photocopiers
PC Desktop
Desks
Rental Cars
Chairs
PC Laptop
Ecotomography Equipment
Projectors
Diesel for heatingOilLubricantsBiodiesel for heatingElectric power
Fixed line telephonyPAX Switching ethernet networksVideo communication systems
Efficient Efficient degree of degree of
competition?competition?
IndependentlyIndependently certified certified by the National by the National
Statistical Authority Statistical Authority (ISTAT) in 2003 and (ISTAT) in 2003 and
20042004
By 2006 national By 2006 national classification systemclassification system
Did we do well ?
Could we have done
better?
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Split of framework contract in many lots: competition issues (1/2)
Consip started a comprehensive plan of cooperation with the Antitrust Authority. The objective is to make the tenders handled by Consip even more open and accessible to all providers.
This is why, for any tender procedure, Consip asks Antitrust Authority’s advice (via the Ministry of Economy and Finance) concerning the competitiveness of the tender itself.
The degree of competition in a given procurement auctions may depend on the participation requirements, rules regarding enterprises’ groupings, and the number and dimension of lots in which the contract is divided.
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Split of framework contract in many lots: competition issues (2/2)
• Length of contract to avoid lock-in (but mind collusion);
• Participation requirements should be as low as possible and not focus excessively on requests which are only indirectly related to the execution of the contract, allowing alternative “means of proof” for the capacity to fulfil the contractual duties;
• Temporary groupings of enterprises and sub-contracting are a mean to overcome the barriers to entry for enterprises not having the necessary ‘critical mass’ to participate to public tenders; however it should not be allowed in a grouping the presence of two enterprises who could match participation requirements autonomously;
• Increasing the number of lots decreases their size hence facilitates participation of SME and reduce risk of lock-in; on the other hand, more and smaller lots may facilitate collusive market-sharing agreements and render more difficult the exploitation of potential economies of scale;
• “Combinatorial auctions” where package bidding is allowed can be a way to allow the exploitation of possible scale economies while at the same time facilitating participation of SMEs.
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Innovative e-procurement tools: On line auctions
Possible Procurement auction formats: Descending Auction (English Auction): the price starts high and competing bidders cut the price until
no-one is willing to bid any lower. Multiple-Round Auction: multiple round auctions are similar to descending ones; in multiple round the
price does not decrease continuously but round by round with a predefined percentage. A multiple round
auction is the discrete version of the descending auction. Sealed Bid Auctions: bidders submit bids in sealed envelopes; the person submitting the best bid wins
the auction and pays what he bid (pay-as-you-bid) OR the person submitting the best bid wins the
auction but pays only the second best bid (pay-as-the-second-best). Descending-Clock Auction (Japanese): the price decreases continuously in a predetermined period of
time (e.g. 1 hour) in which players do not have to submit bids and they are considered to stay in the
auction until they decide to exit. The prize is awarded to the last bidder remained in the auction. Anglo-Dutch Auction: consists in adding a final sealed-bid round (e.g. only for the two best bids) to a
descending auction, in order to hinder potential collusion generated by dynamic.
The various formats have different advantages and disadvantages in terms of information gathered by the bidders and by the auctioneer, potential collusion, and participation. Some of these format my not be allowed by current directive, albeit useful in same cases
Consip experimented the following auction formats:
Descending, Multiple round with unlimited n. of round, Multiple round with a pre-defined n. of
round, Sealed bid (pay-as-you-bid).
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Does e-proc curb corruption?
Possible formats of corruption:
Modify bid of “favored” bidder to let him/her win: reverse auction keeps all players active until price hits each player’s cost;
Pre-Auction to determine “favored” bidder: with sealed bid tender the purchasing price for the taxpayer is higher as winning firm has to pay the bribe. Wth reverse on-line auction firm wins, not paying bribe, by having taxpayer pay lower price;
After seeing bids, the most advantageous “briber” is approached: on-line auction eliminates this by making bids public.
Good! However keep in mind that…
If on-line auction favors collusion, then sealed bid electronic auction with proper security* reduce possibility of corruption ( see Consip);
Corruption through lower quality of goods and services remains a possibility.
* Public e-Procurement: Common Technical Specifications elaboration using State of the Art and Learning Demonstrators. Framework Contract ENTR/01/58-TOOLSW DG ENTR.
Procurement and corruption Procurement and corruption by Lengwiler e Wolfstetter, in Handbook of Public Procurementedited by Dimitri, Piga e Spagnolo, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming in September 2006
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Does e-proc lower collusion?
Strictly speaking, e-auctions increase transparency.
For example, compared to a sealed-bid tender, in ascending auction economic operators get to see the evaluation of their competitors in real time and are allowed to react to it. This increased transparency is often positively considered by procurers:
“Thanks to electronic tools enterprises make various offers and at the same time see the others’ bids. In this way – already at the psychological level –
competition is increased. This in turn leads to better results and savings for the Public Administration. Bidders are masked with a code, which does not allow
them to know the identity of others during the tender. In this way the Administration tries to avoid collusions” (cited in Magrini, p. 36).
On-line auctions and collusion (1)On-line auctions and collusion (1)
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Collusion in auctions
Ascending auctions remove uncertainty about the value of the good and make firms bid more agressively. But online auctions can increase collusion:
competitors get to see, in real time, if a cartel agreement is being broken by a defector and have the possibility to retaliate with lower prices. Knowing this, there will be no defection and collusion will be self-sustained, causing harm to the Administration;the openness of the format may scare away small firms that anticipate being easily topped by big firms during the auction.
Indeed, current practice seem to show a certain caution among EU procurers to choose the e-auction method even if available. Sealed-bid e-auctions are favored.In a sealed-bid, retaliation can occur only in a successive tender, if there is one, and therefore cartels are less sustainable than in an e-auction.
And ….
“Do Framework Agreements facilitate or hinder collusion?”
On-line auctions and collusion (2)On-line auctions and collusion (2) taken from Albano e Spagnolo, in Handbook of Public Procurementedited by Dimitri, Piga and Spagnolo, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming, September 2006
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Innovative e-procurement tools: Public Administrations’ Marketplace
The Marketplace is a virtual market in which any P.A. can select goods and services offered by several suppliers, for purchases below EU threshold
The Marketplace is open to qualified suppliers (and goods) according to not particularly restrictive selection criteria
The entire process is digital, using digital signature in order to guarantee transactions legally
Public Administratio
n Marketplace
Qualified suppliers selected through a qualification process, starting from the date of publication of the “qualification notice”
Suppliers
Central Government
Universities Local
Government Health bodies
Buying administrations
Mark
et
Qualification notice(public announcement)
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Ordini 9.600
3.117
Articoli180.000
113.207
8.000.000
Transato 29.900.000
Anno 2003 Anno 2004 Anno 2005
Ord
ini e
Arti
coli
(N°)
Val
ore
Tran
sato
(€)
+59% vs 2004
+274% vs 2004
+208% vs 2004
Results
550 registered suppliers (81% SMEs) + ~1.100 Punti attivi registrati
Innovative e-procurement tools: Public Administrations’ Marketplace
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Item Item namenameItem Item namename
Technical specifications Technical specifications (standardized catalogue)(standardized catalogue)Technical specifications Technical specifications
(standardized catalogue)(standardized catalogue)Supplier’s Supplier’s namename
Supplier’s Supplier’s namename
PricePricePricePrice
Innovative e-procurement tools: Public Administrations’ Marketplace
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Innovative e-procurement tools : Public Administrations’ Marketplace - Major advantages
To Public Administrations:
costs and process cutting;
potential broadening of suppliers base;
easy access to selected goods (pre-defined quality standards);
information transparency and ease of comparison among goods;
purchases logging and subsequent expenditure monitoring.
To Suppliers:
selling cost reduction (due to broadening of potential customers base and lower intermediation cost);
higher visibility;
more competitiveness especially in local markets (for small and medium sized enterprises);
B2G introduction, especially for large sized enterprises, in addition to existing B2B and B2C.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH DYNAMIC PURCHASING SYSTEMS?
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
Rationalization Program on Public Spending: Program’s results
Define purchasing strategies
Draw up competitive frame contracts for Public Administrations
Promote the use of e-procurement within the Public Administration
Provide purchasing monitoring tools to the Public Administration
Deliver innovative e-procurement models
Service efficiencyand quality
Cost SavingProcess
Simplification
Implementation Performance
Done
Done
Done
Done
Not Done
Very good
Good
Almost good
Almost good
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
© OECD
A jo
int
initi
ativ
e of
th
e O
EC
D a
nd t
he E
urop
ean
Uni
on,
prin
cipa
lly f
inan
ced
by t
he E
U.
“Green procurement policies” support represents an additional goal to frame agreements stipulated by Consip
• The tender for the supply of paper to PA has been worked out also with ANPA’s
partnership (National Agency for Environmental Protection) focusing on the definition of
eco-compatibility requirements:
•exclusion of products containing elementary chlorine – ECF – hexavalent chlorine etc..
•Ecolabel, EMAS or ISO 14001 certifications
• The tender on motor vehicles includes a double feeding model (methane petrol or gpl
petrol) as a test to verify the feasibility of a future specific tender on ecological vehicles,
electric vehicles, hybrids (electric-petrol) etc…..according to the recent European regulation
• Tenders for the supply of photocopiers include the collection of disused second-hand
photocopiers according to the present regulation
• Future tenders on the supply of rubbish skips for waste collection will comply with the
present rules as they will include differentiated waste disposal
Green Procurement