Upload
barry-witt
View
20
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
GT 48310A Evaluation board & Inter Connectics (IS) evaluation. Student: ZIV HAREL Instructors: Moni & Inna (digital lab) Ilan levin (Galileo). Description : . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
GT 48310A Evaluation board &Inter Connectics (IS) evaluation
Student: ZIV HARELInstructors: Moni & Inna (digital lab)
Ilan levin (Galileo)
Description :
The first goal is to evaluate the Mentor-IS tool - by using it to design a fast , problematic board , which was logically designed in Orcad Capture.
The second goal is to design & check an Expandable 8 ports fast Ethernet switch.
2 board versions : 1. Galileo’s (“very best” tool)
2. Technion’s (Mentor tool)
The board (IS view)
Project status
Board : design : done. Installation : done. Checking : done.
IS evaluation : board design : done. Simulation : done. Synthesize : done.
(for critical lines)Pre-production : done.
Final simulation: now.
Contents :
What was evaluated .The data-flow .Notes .Where did I use it ?Comparison to real board.My impression about IS .
What was evaluated
IS installation -> stabilization.Design manager installation-
>stabilization .PC/Unix versions.
Work flow.IBIS models.The IS tool :
- Simulation Validity / synthesis power . - IS Interface .
Mentor’s Support .
ORCAD to MENTOR’S IS data-flow
1 2
Create the Design in Orcad Capture
3 4
Translate the
componentsfile to Mentorformat.
Validate thepackagingand geometry data.
packages,geometry.
5
Placement ,routing
6
Translate files to IS data-base ,simulate & synthesize .
Orcad IS
editordesigner Designer(?)
Mentor board station
Notes
Orcad ->edif ->Design-arch : failed . Orcad ->comp & Netlist -> Mentor :
format mismatch : solved .Back annotation to Orcad : failed.Stable -work -flow : solved.Designer / c.editor / IS relationship:
not sorted yet...
More - notes :IBIS Models :- non-monotonic models :
work around … - availability,accuracy :
partly solved. - models for capacitors :
work around … - models for Magnetics :
failed.Synthesis: - defining the real load :
work around … - handling skew capacitors :
work around …
Where did I use it ?Fast signals:
- 125Mhz clk to 2xSdram & GT48310A. Needed 0.05ns max skew , low noise. - 83.33Mhz clk to 2xSdram & Glink & GT48310A (same as 125M_clk ). - Sdram signals - addr/data - 0.5ns delay.
Differential lines: (couldn't use the IS) Needed 0.5ns max skew , low noise. - differential Tx/Rx lines :same length , needed low : noise - 50mv max.
Comparison to real board
The comparison can’t be accurate - the boards are not identical !
IS predicted correctly signal shape and levels .
IS was too pessimist - circuit is robust!
Fast clock circuits :
125Mhz oscillator
Clk distributor
GT48310A
2 x SDRAM
83.3Mhz source
Main Clk distributor
GT48310A
2 x SDRAM
GT48300
not all resistors are drown .
Alternative supply .
125Mhz clk - after routing
125Mhz clk - on board
Core clk after routing
Core clk - on board
My impression about IS
Work flow . User interface .Stability .Synthesis power/simulation validity . Was it right ???Other tools interfacing IS.Customer support .Notes from companies tour .