1
Growth of Chironomus dilutus Exposed to Ozone-Treated and Untreated Oil Sands Process Water • Canada is home to the second largest proven oil reserves, mostly in Alberta’s Athabasca region • Extraction of usable material (bitumen) from oil sands requires vast quantities of fresh water and produces wastewater - “oil sands process water” (OSPW) • Approximately 4 m 3 of OSPW are produced per 1 m 3 of oil sands processed, but more efficient water recycling has reduced freshwater needs • OSPW has been shown to be toxic to a number of different species; naphthenic acids (NAs) are believed to be responsible for much of the toxicity • Companies are currently held to a zero-discharge policy so treatment methods are required to target NAs and effectively eliminate toxicity of OSPW • One potential treatment method is ozonation, a method commonly used in municipal water treatment and shown to target more persistent and chronically toxic NAs (Fig. 1) • Test organism – Chironomus dilutus larvae (formerly C. tentans), started 13-14 days post-oviposition • Exposure waters – Freshwater control, saltwater control, ozonated OSPW, untreated OSPW • Two degrees of ozonation – Low (50 mg/L) and high (80mg/L) • Exposure conditions – Continuous aeration, 50% water change every 2 days, daily feeding, 10 larvae per rep, 4 reps per treatment, 10 day exposure period • End points – Survival, growth (measured as wet mass) • Parallel assay terminated at Day 4, total RNA collected from pooled samples, sequencing by Illumina RNASeq • No significant differences in survival between any exposure group and the freshwater controls (Figs. 2a and 3a) • Untreated (100%) OSPW significantly inhibited C. dilutus growth (Figs. 2b and 3b) • Low ozonation study (50 mg/L) 100% OSPW-exposed larvae were 64% smaller than freshwater controls (Fig. 2b) Exposure to full strength ozone-treated OSPW no difference in mean wet mass from controls • High ozonation study (80 mg/L) 100% OSPW-exposed larvae were 77% smaller than freshwater controls (Fig. 3b) Exposure to full strength ozone-treated OSPW only 40% smaller than controls • Ozonation reduced the growth inhibition observed in untreated OSPW and may be a treatment option to reduce OSPW toxicity towards aquatic invertebrates • Need to identify an optimal dose of ozonation and investigate whether a dose effect of ozonation is present 1. Transcriptome responses to OSPW and ozonated OSPW Illumina RNAseq transcriptome sequencing of C. dilutus larvae exposed to freshwater, untreated OSPW, and ozone-treated OSPW to determine gene expression profiles Biomarkers of OSPW exposure Biomarkers of effect Molecular basis of toxicity • Over 250 million sequence reads returned by Illumina • Contigs (>300,000) created using CLC Workbench • Scaffolds will be built and sequences will be annotated using BLAST2GO • Gene expression profiles will be generated for the different treatments to determine exposure specific transcriptome responses 2. Behavioral Responses in C. dilutus exposed to OSPW and Ozonated OSPW • Preliminary studies suggest OSPW exposure drastically alters larvae burrowing and tube-building behaviours (Fig. 4) • Effects appear to be attenuated by ozonation of OSPW J. Anderson 1 , S.B. Wiseman 1 , E. Franz 1 , M. Gamal El-Din 2 , J. Martin 3 , P. Jones 1,4 , K. Liber 1,4 , and J.P. Giesy 1, 5, 6, 7 1. Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada 4. School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 5. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 6. State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution, Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Peoples Republic of China 7. Department of Zoology and Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Study Objectives: 1.To characterize the effects of exposure to OSPW in a model benthic invertebrate, Chironomus dilutus 2. To determine whether remediation of OSPW using ozonation effectively reduces its toxicity to aquatic invertebrates Figs. 3a and 3b Effects of high dose ozonation (80 mg/L) on survival and growth (individual wet mass) of C. dilutus larvae following a 10-day exposure. Differences from freshwater controls in survival were determined by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVAs and differences in mass were determined by Student-Newman-Keuls comparisons across treatments (p=0.05). Significant differences designated by different letters. A A B B B B B B B C a b a b Fig. 2a and 2b Effects of low dose ozonation (50 mg/L) on survival and growth (individual wet mass) of C. dilutus larvae following a 10-day exposure. Differences from freshwater controls in survival were determined by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVAs and differences in mass were determined by Student-Newman-Keuls comparisons across treatments (p=0.05). Significant differences designated by an asterisk (*). * BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION • This research was supported by research grants from the Alberta Water Research Institute and Western Economic Diversification Canada to J.P.G. • J.P.G. is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program • J.A. was supported by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship • Thanks to Syncrude Canada Ltd. for support and assistance ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Carbon number Relative Intensity Rings O 3 OSPW NAs Before Ozonation OSPW After Ozonation with 80 mg O 3 /L Fig. 1 Naphthenic acid profile of OSPW prior to ozonation and after treatment with 80 mg/L O 3 . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Carbon number Relative Intensity Rings Fig. 4 Burrowing behaviours observed in a) fresh water, b) OSPW, and c) ozonated OSPW. In the freshwater control, all individuals are within tubes, while the ozonated group has a few individuals not burrowing and the untreated OSPW group displays very little burrowing and tube-building activity. These preliminary results will be investigated further in upcoming studies. a b c STUDIES IN PROGRESS / FUTURE DIRECTIONS Survival Survival Growth Growth

Growth of Chironomus dilutus Exposed to Ozone-Treated and Untreated Oil Sands Process Water

  • Upload
    kina

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Growth of Chironomus dilutus Exposed to Ozone-Treated and Untreated Oil Sands Process Water. J. Anderson 1 , S.B. Wiseman 1 , E. Franz 1 , M. Gamal El-Din 2 , J. Martin 3 , P. Jones 1,4 , K. Liber 1,4 , and J.P. Giesy 1, 5, 6, 7 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Growth of  Chironomus dilutus  Exposed to Ozone-Treated and Untreated Oil Sands Process Water

Growth of Chironomus dilutus Exposed to Ozone-Treated and Untreated Oil Sands Process Water

• Canada is home to the second largest proven oil reserves, mostly in Alberta’s Athabasca region• Extraction of usable material (bitumen) from oil sands requires vast quantities of fresh water and produces wastewater - “oil sands process water” (OSPW)• Approximately 4 m3 of OSPW are produced per 1 m3 of oil sands processed, but more efficient water recycling has reduced freshwater needs• OSPW has been shown to be toxic to a number of different species; naphthenic acids (NAs) are believed to be responsible for much of the toxicity• Companies are currently held to a zero-discharge policy so treatment methods are required to target NAs and effectively eliminate toxicity of OSPW• One potential treatment method is ozonation, a method commonly used in municipal water treatment and shown to target more persistent and chronically toxic NAs (Fig. 1)

• Test organism – Chironomus dilutus larvae (formerly C. tentans), started 13-14 days post-oviposition• Exposure waters – Freshwater control, saltwater control, ozonated OSPW, untreated OSPW• Two degrees of ozonation – Low (50 mg/L) and high (80mg/L)• Exposure conditions – Continuous aeration, 50% water change every 2 days, daily feeding, 10 larvae per rep, 4 reps per treatment, 10 day exposure period• End points – Survival, growth (measured as wet mass)• Parallel assay terminated at Day 4, totalRNA collected from pooled samples, sequencing by Illumina RNASeq

• No significant differences in survival between any exposure group and the freshwater controls (Figs. 2a and 3a)

• Untreated (100%) OSPW significantly inhibited C. dilutus growth (Figs. 2b and 3b)

• Low ozonation study (50 mg/L)100% OSPW-exposed larvae were 64% smaller than freshwater controls (Fig. 2b)Exposure to full strength ozone-treated OSPW no difference in mean wet mass from controls

• High ozonation study (80 mg/L) 100% OSPW-exposed larvae were 77% smaller than freshwater controls (Fig. 3b)Exposure to full strength ozone-treated OSPW only 40% smaller than controls

• Ozonation reduced the growth inhibition observed in untreated OSPW and may be a treatment option to reduce OSPW toxicity towards aquatic invertebrates

• Need to identify an optimal dose of ozonation and investigate whether a dose effect of ozonation is present

1. Transcriptome responses to OSPW and ozonated OSPW• Illumina RNAseq transcriptome sequencing of C. dilutus larvae exposed to freshwater, untreated OSPW, and ozone-treated OSPW to determine gene expression profiles

Biomarkers of OSPW exposure Biomarkers of effect Molecular basis of toxicity

• Over 250 million sequence reads returned by Illumina • Contigs (>300,000) created using CLC Workbench• Scaffolds will be built and sequences will be annotated using BLAST2GO• Gene expression profiles will be generated for the different treatments to determine exposure specific transcriptome responses

2. Behavioral Responses in C. dilutus exposed to OSPW and Ozonated OSPW• Preliminary studies suggest OSPW exposure drastically alters larvae burrowing and tube-building behaviours (Fig. 4) • Effects appear to be attenuated by ozonation of OSPW

J. Anderson 1, S.B. Wiseman 1, E. Franz 1, M. Gamal El-Din 2, J. Martin 3, P. Jones 1,4, K. Liber 1,4, and J.P. Giesy 1, 5, 6, 7

1. Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

3. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada4. School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

5. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada6. State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution, Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Peoples Republic of China

7. Department of Zoology and Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

Study Objectives:1.To characterize the effects of exposure to OSPW in a model benthic invertebrate, Chironomus dilutus

2. To determine whether remediation of OSPW using ozonation effectively reduces its toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Figs. 3a and 3b Effects of high dose ozonation (80 mg/L) on survival and growth (individual wet mass) of C. dilutus larvae following a 10-day exposure. Differences from freshwater controls in survival were determined by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVAs and differences in mass were determined by Student-Newman-Keuls comparisons across treatments (p=0.05). Significant differences designated by different letters.

A AB B

BB

B

B

B

C

a b

a b

Fig. 2a and 2b Effects of low dose ozonation (50 mg/L) on survival and growth (individual wet mass) of C. dilutus larvae following a 10-day exposure. Differences from freshwater controls in survival were determined by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVAs and differences in mass were determined by Student-Newman-Keuls comparisons across treatments (p=0.05). Significant differences designated by an asterisk (*).

*

BACKGROUND

METHODS

RESULTS DISCUSSION

• This research was supported by research grants from the Alberta Water Research Institute and Western Economic Diversification Canada to J.P.G. • J.P.G. is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program • J.A. was supported by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship• Thanks to Syncrude Canada Ltd. for support and assistance

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

0

2

4

6

8

0246

81012

Carbon number

Rela

tive

Inte

nsity

Rings

O3

OSPW NAs Before OzonationOSPW After Ozonation with

80 mg O3/L

Fig. 1 Naphthenic acid profile of OSPW prior to ozonation and after treatment with 80 mg/L O3.

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

0

2

4

6

8

0246

81012

Carbon number

Rela

tive

Inte

nsity

Rings

Fig. 4 Burrowing behaviours observed in a) fresh water, b) OSPW, and c) ozonated OSPW. In the freshwater control, all individuals are within tubes, while the ozonated group has a few individuals not burrowing and the untreated OSPW group displays very little burrowing and tube-building activity. These preliminary results will be investigated further in upcoming studies.

a b c

STUDIES IN PROGRESS / FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Survival

Survival

Growth

Growth