3
SEARCH tel. +44 (0)203 031 2900 CHALLENGE US MY FAVOURITES ACCOUNT LOG OUT HOME ABOUT IDEAS LIBRARY IDEAS BY INSTITUTIONS Home Ideas Library Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’ Explained 10.13007/234 Ideas for Leaders #234 Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’ Explained Key Concept Group coaching can be a catalyst for both individual and organizational change. Its ‘active ingredients’, however, are not commonly understood. Greater awareness of why and when group coaching works can help maximise its benefits. Anecdotal evidence and research suggest effective sessions share a number of key characteristics. Idea Summary Group coaching is known to help break down barriers to communication, build trust and solve specific and practical problems in organizations. An interpersonal learning process, it can create the impetus for change. Its effects can be explained by psychology and psychodynamics. Good coaches use the ‘clinical paradigm’ as a conceptual framework for group sessions. They recognise that people are products, not just of their genetic inheritance, but also of their experiences, and will often re-activate in current relationships and situations behaviours and attitudes ‘learned’ from relationships and situations in the past. Through careful facilitation, they identify negative or destructive thoughts, feelings and behaviours and outdated perceptions of the self. Much like group therapy, group coaching helps people examine and reflect on their own behaviour, the behaviour of others and the inter-relationship between the two. It holds up a mirror that lets people see things more clearly and helps provides the motivation for change. This is the general context. What are the specific processes that underly group coaching? What is the X-factor it provides? And how do its effects differ from those of one-to-one coaching? Research and experience suggest successful interventions have certain characteristics in common. These can be summarised as ten points: 1. Coaches construct a safe, ‘transitional space’ for participants, where they have permission to talk about issues they never had the opportunity to confront before and can explore their feelings and challenges without the fear of judgment or rejection. 2. Coaches are sensitive to ‘cloud’ issues — those matters of ‘unfinished business’ that drift or float between participants and, potentially, create hostility and antipathy. 3. Coaches and group members encourage emotional catharsis but they also ‘contain’ it by helping an individual understand better why certain ‘psychological wounds’ have been so troublesome. (The catharsis, in other words, does not take place for its own sake but is a means to an end.) 4. Participants listen to others and begin to feel that they are not alone in experiencing Authors Kets de Vries, Manfred F. R. Institutions INSEAD Source INSEAD Working Paper Idea conceived May 2012 Idea posted October 2013 DOI number Subject Change Management Team Building and Teamwork Coaching Executive Development Mentoring Psychology Haven't found what you need? Challenge us GO

Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’ Explained · 7. Certain members of the group become role models for certain types of effective behaviours and therefore a force for change. 8. Participants

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’ Explained · 7. Certain members of the group become role models for certain types of effective behaviours and therefore a force for change. 8. Participants

SEARCH

tel. +44 (0)203 031 2900

CHALLENGE US MY FAVOURITES ACCOUNT LOG OUT

HOME ABOUT IDEAS LIBRARY IDEAS BY INSTITUTIONS

Home Ideas Library Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’ Explained

10.13007/234

Ideas for Leaders #234

Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’

Explained

Key Concept

Group coaching can be a catalyst for both individual and organizational

change. Its ‘active ingredients’, however, are not commonly understood.

Greater awareness of why and when group coaching works can help

maximise its benefits. Anecdotal evidence and research suggest effective

sessions share a number of key characteristics.

Idea Summary

Group coaching is known to help break down barriers to communication, build

trust and solve specific and practical problems in organizations. An

interpersonal learning process, it can create the impetus for change. Its

effects can be explained by psychology and psychodynamics.

Good coaches use the ‘clinical paradigm’ as a conceptual framework for

group sessions. They recognise that people are products, not just of their

genetic inheritance, but also of their experiences, and will often re-activate in

current relationships and situations behaviours and attitudes ‘learned’ from

relationships and situations in the past. Through careful facilitation, they

identify negative or destructive thoughts, feelings and behaviours and

outdated perceptions of the self.

Much like group therapy, group coaching helps people examine and reflect on

their own behaviour, the behaviour of others and the inter-relationship

between the two. It holds up a mirror that lets people see things more clearly

and helps provides the motivation for change.

This is the general context. What are the specific processes that underly

group coaching? What is the X-factor it provides? And how do its effects differ

from those of one-to-one coaching?

Research and experience suggest successful interventions have certain

characteristics in common. These can be summarised as ten points:

1. Coaches construct a safe, ‘transitional space’ for participants, where they have

permission to talk about issues they never had the opportunity to confront before and can

explore their feelings and challenges without the fear of judgment or rejection.

2. Coaches are sensitive to ‘cloud’ issues — those matters of ‘unfinished business’ that drift

or float between participants and, potentially, create hostility and antipathy.

3. Coaches and group members encourage emotional catharsis but they also ‘contain’ it

by helping an individual understand better why certain ‘psychological wounds’ have been so

troublesome. (The catharsis, in other words, does not take place for its own sake but is a

means to an end.)

4. Participants listen to others and begin to feel that they are not alone in experiencing

Authors

Kets de Vries, Manfred F. R.

Institutions

INSEAD

Source

INSEAD Working Paper

Idea conceived

May 2012

Idea posted

October 2013

DOI number

Subject

Change Management

Team Building and Teamwork

Coaching

Executive Development

Mentoring

Psychology

Haven't found what you

need?

Challenge us

GO

Page 2: Group Coaching: The ‘X-Factor’ Explained · 7. Certain members of the group become role models for certain types of effective behaviours and therefore a force for change. 8. Participants

problems. This brings a great sense of relief, opening up the possibility of discussing new

ways of dealing with things.

5. Coaches use the clinical paradigm to allow participants to reflect in ways that lead to a

willingness to experiment with new approaches and create new hope for the future. Is that the

only way? Is that behaviour still effective now?

6. Participants make presentations to the group that offer the opportunity for vicarious

learning, the possibility for retaining and replicating effective behaviours observed in others.

7. Certain members of the group become role models for certain types of effective

behaviours and therefore a force for change.

8. Participants become a real community, members of a tribe that has gone through the same

emotional experience. (Bound together socially, they become emotionally and psychologically

motivated to change.)

9. The coach knows when to ‘hang back’ and when to intervene to reduce anxiety by offering

advice.

10. Members don’t simply point out others’ dysfunctional character patterns; they offer to

help them and suggest alternative approaches to problems. (A kind of virtuous circle of

enlightened self-interest develops in which members work on their own and each others’

problems.)

These psychodynamic processes create tipping points for change.

Business Application

Group coaching can help companies address specific problems — ranging

from how to integrate a newly acquired business or a new IT system to how to

make meetings more productive.

More generally, it can foster the trust needed for effective collaboration and

lay the foundations for real information exchange in organizations, creating

networks, cutting across silos and breaking down barriers to communication.

It should not, however, be seen as a ‘quick win’. It will need to be preceded by

‘ground work’ and followed by further intervention from the coach and further

investment from group members.

Assessments of participants by organizations for leadership competencies,

and feedback from colleagues and family and friends, will help ‘jump-start’ the

process. Post-session conference calls with coaches, follow-up sessions to

re-examine action plans, and peer coaching from another member of the

group will help keep people on track and maintain momentum.

Further Reading

The Group Coaching Conundrum. Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries. INSEAD Working Paper

(May 2012).

Coach and Couch: The Psychology of Making Better Leaders. Manfred F. R. Kets de

Vries, Konstantin Korotov & Elizabeth Florent-Treacy. INSEAD Business Press (2007).

The Coaching Kaleidoscope: Insights from the Inside. Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries,

Laura Guillén & Konstantin Korotov. INSEAD Business Press (2010).

Tricky Coaching: Difficult Cases in Leadership Coaching. Konstantin Korotov, Manfred

Kets de Vries, Andreas Bernhardt & Elizabeth Florent-Treacy. INSEAD Business Press

(2011).

The Hedgehog Effect: The Secrets of Building High Performing Teams. Manfred Kets de

Vries. John Wiley & Sons (2011).

Further Relevant Resources

Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries’s profile at INSEAD

INSEAD Executive Education profile at IEDP