42
Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009

Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Grand Rapids Public SchoolsAugust 18, 2009

Page 2: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Contact information:

Terri MetcalfMiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa

[email protected] ext 4112

www.cenmi.org/miblsi

Page 3: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

What to expect . . .What is “response to intervention” or RtI?

History and background

RtI and Behavior: Overview of Schoolwide Positive

Behavior Support

Resources and next steps

Page 4: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Background knowledge and importance

Page 5: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

What is response to intervention? Response to intervention is . . .

Response to intervention is

not . . .

RtIRTIThree-tier modelProblem solving

modelThe Triangle model

Special education eligibility

Pre-referral modelTier 2 pull-out Just for readingJust for learning

disabilitiesDIBELS

Page 6: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

RtI is . . . . . .the practice of providing high-quality instruction and interventions matched to student need, monitoring progress frequently to make decisions about changes in instruction or goals and applying child response data to important educational decisions. NASDSE, RtI: Policy Considerations and Implementation, 2005 (emphasis

added).

Page 7: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Core Principles of an RtI Framework1. We can effectively teach all children.

2. Intervene early.

3. Use a multi-tier model of support.

4. Use a problem-solving method for decision making.

5. Research-based interventions/instruction to the extent available.

6. Monitor student progress to inform instruction.

7. Use data to make decisions.

8. Use assessment for different purposes.NASDSE, RtI: Policy Considerations and Implementation, 2005

Page 8: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

How does this tie into POL?

Page 9: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Why change, why now?ResearchLegislation

Page 10: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Research

Page 11: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Converging evidence shows that most children can be taught to read at grade level 201 randomly selected children from five elementary

schools serving children from mixed SES and ethnic backgrounds were followed from the beginning of first grade to the end of fourth grade.

Children who scored low on phonemic awareness and letter knowledge at the beginning of first gradeStarted with lower skillsMade less progressFell further and further below grade level as they

progressed from first through fourth grade.

Page 12: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Grade level corresponding to age 1 2 3 4

Re

adi

ng

gra

de le

vel 4

3

2

1

5

2.5

5.2

Low score (high risk) on Early Screening

High Score (low risk) on Screening

Page 13: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Instruction is What Matters!Four years later, the researchers went back to the same school. Two major changes were implemented:

First, a research-based comprehensive reading program was implemented for all students, and

Second, children at risk for reading difficulty were randomly assigned to a control group(no special intervention) or to a group receiving substantial instructional intervention.

Page 14: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Re

adi

ng

gra

de le

vel

Grade level corresponding to age 1 2 3 4

4

3

2

1

5

2.5

5.2

At Risk on Early Screening

Low Risk on Early Screening

3.2

Control

With research-based core but without extra instructional intervention

4.9

Interventio

n

With substantial instructional intervention

Page 15: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Legislation

Page 16: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

LegislationReauthorization of Individuals with Disabilities

Act (IDEA) Became effective October 13, 2006

Incorporated new requirements for identifying students with learning disabilitiesAllow districts to consider a child’s

“response to scientific, research-based intervention” as part of evaluation process §300.309(a)(2)(i)

Shortened to response to intervention or RtI

Page 17: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

RtI is a Well-Child Program for EducationHealth Care

Infant screeningsAnnual check-upsComparison to

developmental standards

ImmunizationsUse of research-based

standard protocol treatments for common problems

Hypothesis testing as part of evaluation

Referral for specialist care if needed

EducationStandardized screeningThree yearly “check-

ups”Comparison to local and

national benchmarksUse of research-based

instruction for general education instruction

Hypothesis testing as part of curriculum and assessment practices

Referral to special education only if progress in other instruction is not made

Page 18: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Where did this come from???We have been using components of RtI for a

long time: e.g. progress monitoring measures, differentiated instruction, etc.

Flipping systems from “everyone is assumed to be ok until they aren’t” to screening and intervening right away

Page 19: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Multi-Tiered Support

Universal PreventionCore Instruction, all students,preventive, proactive80%

Targeted Intervention Supplemental, some students, reduce risk 15-20%

Intensive Intervention Individualized, functional assessment, highly specific 5-10%

All Students in School

Page 20: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

What has been the national impact of RtI and schools?32% of districts expect full implementation of

RtI by 201047% of districts have a “defined RtI process”

– 53% do not71% of districts report that implementation is

led by general education or a joint general ed/special ed effort

84% of districts report implementation for reading, 53% for math and 44% for behavior

CASE Survey, 2008

Page 21: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

ELEVATOR TEST: What is RtI?Write a brief (30-60 second) description of RtI

Share with a partner

Page 22: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

What about behavior?

Page 23: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Relationship between behavior and reading

Children of the Code: A Social Education Project

http://www.childrenofthecode.org/

Page 24: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Big Ideas to Improve Behavior Specify appropriate behaviorTeach appropriate behaviorMonitor behaviorEncourage appropriate behaviorCorrect inappropriate behaviorUse data to problem solve

Page 25: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Big Ideas…

People need to know what is expected of them

Identify small number of expectations that are comprehensive that reflect the school’s values

Make the expectations observable

Identifying Behavior Expectations

Page 26: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

School Rules

NO Food

NO Weapons

NO Backpacks

NO Drugs/Smoking

NO Bullying

Consider your impressions of this school

Consider your impressions of this school

Page 27: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Defining Behavior ExpectationsBehavior expectations must be defined in

each setting Definitions should be positively stated Definitions should be observable Use simple, concrete languageNEVER assume that the students will

“understand what we mean”

Page 28: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Westwood School

Portage Community High SchoolSouth Range

Holland Heights Elementary

Page 29: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Transform broad school-wide Expectations into specific, observable behaviors.

  Classroom Lunchroom Bus Hallway Playground

Respect Others

Use inside voice

Eat your own food

Stay in your seat

Stay to the right

Wait your turn

Respect Property

Recycle paper

Return traysKeep feet on

the floorPut trash in

cansAt bell return equipment

Respect Yourself

Do your bestWash your

handsBe at stop

on timeUse your

wordsHave a plan

Page 30: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Big Ideas…

Learning what to do socially is just like learning what to do academically

Proactively teach pro-social behaviors

Create opportunities for reviewing expectations throughout school year

Teaching Behavior Expectations

Page 31: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Process for Teaching Behavioral ExpectationsDefine the ExpectationProvide a RationaleTeach the Critical Discrimination

Demonstrate Appropriate BehaviorDemonstrate Unacceptable BehaviorPractice telling the difference with multiple

examplesIf there is a “signal” teach the signal (when should

the appropriate behavior occur?)Have everyone practice the appropriate behaviorAcknowledge students for demonstrating

appropriate behavior

Page 32: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Teaching Behavior Expectations in Hallway:East Elementary

Presentation: By grade, students will file into hallway. Facilitator will announce expectation to the group, define it, and discuss the rationale. Volunteers will then demonstrate the incorrect way to act safe and respectful in the hallway (e.g., touching and pushing others, looking around and not paying attention, talking in line, and turning around looking and talking to other students.) Students that are observing will rate the performance by holding up pre-made signs that either say, “wrong way” or “right way”. A set of students will then demonstrate the expectation the right way (e.g., walking with hands at sides and feet to self, watching where class is going, no talking, looking straight ahead.) Students will then be asked to hold the signs up again. Volunteers will be acknowledged with reinforcers (pencils/erasers).

Practice: Each individual class will be asked to demonstrate. The remaining class(s) will rate the demonstrating classroom with performance cards.

Reinforcement: Provide specific verbal praise to students after practice session. After completion of training, each student will get a punch on the card with the school-wide settings listed 1) hallway, 2) bathroom, 3) lunchroom, 4) bus, 5) playground, 6) LMC, 7) Assembly. When all settings have been trained, the card will be worth a snow cone or free popcorn.

Follow-up Plan: Daily, for the first three weeks of school, teachers provide precorrections (reminders about what the hallway expectations are as part of transition to specials, re-entry after recess, and dismissal). Weekly, next four weeks of school. Students will be reinforced with tickets. A video will be created to show students as needed for reinforcement.

Materials Needed: Facilitator for lesson, Volunteers to do skit (classroom teachers for particular grade levels, Kim, Miriam, Special teachers), Performance cards, Video recorder, tickets, punch cards, and reinforcers.

Page 33: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Build Reward SystemsSystems for Acknowledging Appropriate Behavior.

Students should be acknowledged regularly (at least every 2 weeks)

5 to 1 ratio of positive to negativeAlways build toward independence

move from “other” delivered to self-delivered move from frequent reward to infrequent move from concrete to natural

Build on person-to-person relationships

Page 34: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Many schools use a ticket system

•Tied into school expectations

•Specific feedback on student’s behavior

•Provides visible acknowledge of appropriate behavior for student

•Helps to remind staff to provide acknowledgements

High School Students involved in Colorado PBS

Cherokee High School

Page 35: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Effective Discipline SystemUse negative consequences to:

Minimize natural rewards for problem behavior

Prevent escalating interactionsAllow instruction to continue

Build predictable, consistent negative consequences

Do not expect negative consequences alone to change behavior.

Page 36: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Big Ideas…

Data should be easy to collect and use

Evaluate and regularly act on student behavior outcome data

Regularly collect process data and use this to guide and improve implementation efforts

Data Tools

Page 37: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

The School-Wide Information SystemThe School-Wide Information System

Web-based information system designed to help school personnel to use office referral data to design school-wide and individual student interventions.

Provides school personnel with accurate, timely and practical information for making decisions about discipline systems

www.swis.org

Page 38: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Example from Mulick Park

Page 39: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Teaching Tolerance articleArticle on school using Positive Behavior

Support model

Page 40: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

How can I find additional information on the components of RtI?

Page 41: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Additional ResourcesMiBLSi (Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Support

Initiative) Webpage:www.cenmi.org/miblsiOAISD Early Intervention Webpage:www.oaisd.org/earlyintervention

RtI resources pageLinks to additional websites on RtI; screening and progress

monitoring assessments; intervention ideas and lesson plans

Page 42: Grand Rapids Public Schools August 18, 2009. Contact information: Terri Metcalf MiBLSi Regional Coordinator for Kent and Ottawa ISDs tmetcalf@oaisd.org

Helpful websitesThe RtI Action Networkwww.rtinetwork.org

National Center on Response to Intervention (RTI)

www.rti4success.org

Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support www.pbis.org