Go!PlannerCollaborative trip service prototype

Group 10

Yuyin Yang Jingxiang Gou

Xiuming XuFilippo Forti

1

Design problem

●

●

●

2

User Profile

Persona Anna23, Koln, University Student, Energetic,

She is really responsive and having a warm heart, efficient in scheduling and planning for things.

Bob22, Berlin, College Student, lazy, hating to plan

Current life for Bob is tight and he is having some problem with his leg, so he tends to be lazy and eats a lot.

Cathy21, Achen, Student, photographer

Loves to shoot film and travel to unique places, as this will add some inspiration to her photos and creation. Eccentric!

High school / college students young, passionate about life but have a tight schedule, low income, want to travel with their close friends.

3

Final design concept

GoPlanner is an service across tablets, phones and smart watches. It helps people collaborate on trip planning more efficiently.

the Organizer choose the potential spots for group membersMembers vote for their intentional attractionsSystem combines the results to generate the best route including the transportation means along spots

4

Design Diagram

5

Multi-platforms, tablets, mobile, smart watches, etc

Chat on disagreementthrough text, voice chat

Best route generated based on voting results

Real-time itinerary information

Video prototype Scenario 1:

6

Justification (key improve, alternatives) 1. Initially, we didn’t express clearly. We just assumed spots are grouped by

location. And it’s also not consistent in design or video prototyping, as we didn’t show the “clustering nearbys” idea into the route.

2. We initially want to vote by swiping left/ right the pictures. The alternatives are that we can use the volume button + and - for yes and no, also click the icons on the maps for selection, and check the spots from a grid view.

3. We didn’t consider spots selection, we just thought it was the organizer’s call. Then we combined the date and the time’s information, and spots would be shown according to the availability the specific time.

4. We initially wanted the organizer to make the choice according to the voting results, by drawing lines between the spots. The alternatives are the system generates the most time efficient route, and the organizer makes some changes based on the system’s suggested route.

Grouping attractions.

Voting scheme

Spots selection

Route part

7

Q&A

Thanks !

8

Quick Poster

9

Paris Map

10

Grouping: Nearby attractions

11

Grouping: Nearby attractions

Grouping

12

Optimal route planning

13

Finalize the trip plan

Finalized route and transportation

14