66
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS Act) represents one of the most comprehensive overhauls of the securities laws in recent years. One of the principal goals of the JOBS Act is to improve access to the capital markets for smaller issuers, referred to in the Act as emerging growth companies, or EGCs. To accomplish this goal, the JOBS Act seeks to reduce the costs of conducting a public offering and complying with the ensuing reporting obligations by making certain disclosure requirements voluntary for EGCs. This Article examines whether these scaled disclosure rules have increased the number of small issuers conducting an initial public offering (IPO) of their equity securities and the extent to which these issuers have taken advantage of the various exemptions available to them under the JOBS Act. The evidence presented in this Article shows that EGCs have increasingly taken advantage of several of the scaled disclosure provisions of the JOBS Act during their IPOs. EGCs that take advantage of these scaled disclosure provisions are smaller, younger, and more likely to belong to the R&D- intensive pharmaceutical industry. Notably, despite the fact that EGCs are embracing these scaled disclosure provisions, there has not been a noticeable increase in the proportion of IPOs conducted by issuers that qualify as EGCs. The Article explores two interrelated explanations for these seemingly contradictory findings. First, the evidence indicates that the benefits of the JOBS Act may not be as significant as may have been expected. While the direct costs of conducting an IPO have not decreased for EGCs following the enactment of the JOBS Act, indirect costs may have actually increased. In addition, by their second fiscal year, over forty percent of issuers that went public as EGCs no longer qualify for such status, a fact that limits the expected ongoing benefits of the JOBS Act at the going public decision stage. Second, certain issuers that qualify for EGC status may be choosing to pursue private offerings, which certain provisions of the JOBS Act facilitate. Changes in the mix of small issuers going public following the enactment of the JOBS Act suggest such a shift in the pattern of going public decisions across firms.

Going Public After the JOBS Act

  • Upload
    voanh

  • View
    221

  • Download
    6

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Going Public After the JOBS Act

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS Act) represents one of the most comprehensive overhauls of the securities laws in recent years. One of the principal goals of the JOBS Act is to improve access to the capital markets for smaller issuers, referred to in the Act as emerging growth companies, or EGCs. To accomplish this goal, the JOBS Act seeks to reduce the costs of conducting a public offering and complying with the ensuing reporting obligations by making certain disclosure requirements voluntary for EGCs.

This Article examines whether these scaled disclosure rules have increased the number of small issuers conducting an initial public offering (IPO) of their equity securities and the extent to which these issuers have taken advantage of the various exemptions available to them under the JOBS Act. The evidence presented in this Article shows that EGCs have increasingly taken advantage of several of the scaled disclosure provisions of the JOBS Act during their IPOs. EGCs that take advantage of these scaled disclosure provisions are smaller, younger, and more likely to belong to the R&D-intensive pharmaceutical industry. Notably, despite the fact that EGCs are embracing these scaled disclosure provisions, there has not been a noticeable increase in the proportion of IPOs conducted by issuers that qualify as EGCs. The Article explores two interrelated explanations for these seemingly contradictory findings.

First, the evidence indicates that the benefits of the JOBS Act may not be as significant as may have been expected. While the direct costs of conducting an IPO have not decreased for EGCs following the enactment of the JOBS Act, indirect costs may have actually increased. In addition, by their second fiscal year, over forty percent of issuers that went public as EGCs no longer qualify for such status, a fact that limits the expected ongoing benefits of the JOBS Act at the going public decision stage. Second, certain issuers that qualify for EGC status may be choosing to pursue private offerings, which certain provisions of the JOBS Act facilitate. Changes in the mix of small issuers going public following the enactment of the JOBS Act suggest such a shift in the pattern of going public decisions across firms.

Page 2: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

The Costs of Becoming Public Regulatory Compliance Costs Underwriters’ (Gross) Spread IPO Underpricing

The Costs of Being Public

Justifying a Mandatory Disclosure Regime Pre-JOBS Exemptions for Small Issuers The JOBS Act & the Going Public Decision of EGCs

Scaled Disclosure Requirements During IPO Scaled Disclosure Requirements After IPO Testing the Waters & Confidential Submissions Alternatives to IPOs in the Post-JOBS World

Assessing the Potential Impact of the JOBS Act

Constructing the IPO Database Changes in IPO Volume After JOBS Adoption of Scaled Disclosure by EGCs

Filing of a Confidential Draft Registration Statement Financial & Executive Compensation Disclosure Compliance with Revised Accounting Standards Scaled Disclosure & Issuer Characteristics Overview of Findings

The Costs of Going Public After JOBS Regulatory Compliance Costs Underwriters’ Spread IPO Underpricing Overview of Findings

Being Public After JOBS

See, e.g. Fleeing to Foreign Shores

archived at

Page 3: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

available at

archived at

See, e.g. The Costs of Being Public After Sarbanes-Oxley: The Irony of “Going Private ”

Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations

See, e.g. The High Cost of IPOs Depresses Venture Capital in the United States

Thinking of Going Public? Think Twice, Then Read the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

See, e.g. available atarchived at

The Law of Unintended Consequences: The Effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Venture Funding of Smaller Enterprises

Going-Private Decisions and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: A Cross-Country Analysis

supra

Page 4: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

infra

Id.

archived at see Twitter Files for Initial Public Offering

archived at

infra

See infraSee infra

Page 5: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See infraSee infraSee infraSee infraSee infraSee infra

The JOBS Act II is Coming!

archived at See infra

See infra

Page 6: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See, e.g. Evidence on What CFOs Think About the IPO Process: Practice, Theory, and Managerial Implications

The Birth of Rule 144A Equity Offerings

What Makes a Company a Good Candidate for Going Public? Criteria, Advantages, and Disadvantages Related to Going Public in

See suprasee also

Security Offerings in

See The Choice of IPO Versus Takeover: Empirical Evidence

SeeWhy Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis

See Going Public, Selling Stock, and Buying Liquidity

Page 7: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

The Costs of Becoming Public

Regulatory Compliance Costs

See Deconstructing Equity: Public Ownership, Agency Costs, and Complete Capital Markets

Deciding Whether to Go Public: Certain Basic Considerations in

See, e.g. Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity

SeeVenture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks Versus Stock

Markets

See

See

See Small Business and the SEC: A Guide for Small Businesses on Raising Capital and Complying with the Federal Securities Laws

archived at

Page 8: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See

see also

See available at archived at see also

Id.

Page 9: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See

SeeExecutive Compensation: The New Compensation

Discussion and Analysis

See

see alsoProceed at Your Peril: Crowdfunding and the Securities Act of

1933

See

See, e.g.

See

Page 10: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

supra See

available at archived at

Id. Id.

See available at

archived at infra

infra See generally supra

See infra

Page 11: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Underwriters’ (Gross) Spread

See, e.g. supra

See id. Id. See supra

See supra See supra Id.

See Are There Economies of Scale in Underwriting Fees? Evidence of Rising External Financing Costs

The Seven Percent Solution

Are Initial Returns and Underwriting Spreads in Equity Issues Complements or Substitutes?

Page 12: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

IPO Underpricing

See Seasoned Equity Offerings: Quality of Accounting Information and Expected Flotation Costs

See, e.g. supra

IPO Underpricing in supra Investment Banking and Securities Issuance in

Tesla Motors, Inc. Stock Quote & Summary Data

archived at See

supra

See supra

See

Page 13: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

available atarchived at

see infra see infra

see infra infra

See supra

See Issuer Expenses and Legal Liability in Initial Public Offerings

Anatomy of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock

Id.See, e.g. supra

See A Model of the Demand for Investment Banking Advising and Distribution Services for New Issues

See Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings

See Why New Issues Are Underpriced

See Institutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence

See Investment Banking, Reputation, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings

Page 14: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

ex ante

The Costs of Being Public

See, e.g. Evidence of Information Spillovers in the Production of Investment Banking Services

IPO Pricing in the Dot-com BubbleVenture Capitalist

Certification in Initial Public Offerings The “Hot Issue” Market of 1980

See The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of Adverse-Selection and Signaling Theories

See infra see also supra

See generallysupra

Page 15: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See supraSee, e.g.

available at archived at

See generally

See id.

See, e.g. The New “Public” Corporation

Public Governance

See Sarbanes-Oxley: The Evidence Regarding the Impact of SOX 404

ee e.g.

Page 16: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Seeavailable at

archived at

See infra

See supra infraSee supra

See, e.g. Corporate Investment and Stock Market Listing: A Puzzle?

See Agency, Information and Corporate Investment insupra But see

supra

Page 17: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Justifying a Mandatory Disclosure Regime

See, e.g. supra

See infraSee The Securities Act at Its Diamond Jubilee: Renewing the

Case for a Robust Registration Requirement

See Can Internet Offerings Bridge the Small Business Capital Barrier?

SeeMandatory Disclosure and the Protection of Investors

But see The Financial Reporting Environment: Review of the Recent Literature

Page 18: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See The Theory and Practice of Securities Disclosure

But see Fairness, Utility, and Market Risk

Information and the Cost of Capital Securities Laws and the Social Costs of “Inaccurate” Stock Prices Information Asymmetry, Information Precision, and the Cost of Capital

See Issuers and Investor Protection in

Mandatory Disclosure as a Solution to Agency Problems

See generally Market Failure and the Economic Case for a Mandatory Disclosure System

See Patching a Hole in the JOBS Act: How and Why to Rewrite the Rules That Require Firms to Make Periodic Disclosures

See An Argument for Imposing Disclosure Requirements on Public Companies

See, e.g. supra

Page 19: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See supra

See, e.g. Investor Protection and Interest Group Politics

See Protection from What? Investor Protection and the JOBS Act

See Accuracy Enhancement, Agency Costs, and Disclosure Regulation

See, e.g. supra

See infra

See supra

Page 20: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Pre-JOBS Exemptions for Small Issuers

See supra

“Publicness” in Contemporary Securities Regulation After the JOBS Act

The Law and Economics of Scaled Equity Market Regulation

See,e.g. Portable Reciprocity: Rethinking the International Reach of Securities Regulation

Retaining Mandatory Securities Disclosure: Why Issuer Choice Is Not Investor Empowerment Securities Regulation as Lobster Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory of Mandatory Disclosure

Empowering Investors: A Market Approach to Securities Regulation

The Need for Competition in International Securities Regulation

See, e.g.

see alsoSmaller Reporting Companies: Disclosure and Governance Considerations

available atarchived at

supra

Page 21: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

supra

supra

See supra

Page 22: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

The JOBS Act & the Going Public Decision of EGCs

Scaled Disclosure Requirements During IPO

See id.

supra

See Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act Frequently Asked Questions

Page 23: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Scaled Disclosure Requirements After IPO

archived at

See supraSee supra See

See supra

See supra See supraSee supra

See supra

Page 24: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Id. Id. supra

See

Fixing 404The Case Against Exempting Smaller

Reporting Companies from Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: Why Market-Based Solutions Are Likely to Harm Ordinary Investors

See

See

Page 25: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Testing the Waters & Confidential Submissions

Id.

See

See

available atarchived at

See supra

Page 26: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See supraSee, e.g. “Testing the Waters”—The SEC’s Feet Go from

Wet to Cold

supra

Page 27: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Alternatives to IPOs in the Post-JOBS World

See

available atarchived at

See supra

See supra

Page 28: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See supra

supra

supra

See, e.g. supra

Id.See supra

Page 29: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See SEC Adopts Amendments to Rule 506 and Rule 144A to Permit General Solicitation and General Advertising, and Proposes Additional Related Requirements

archived at

available atarchived at see

also Questioning the 500 Equity Holders Trigger

Id. See

Id.

Page 30: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See

Id.

See id.

Id. supra

See Information Issues on Wall Street 2.0

supra Securities Law’s Dirty Little Secret

Page 31: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Assessing the Potential Impact of the JOBS Act

See supra See supraSee supra

supra

infra

Page 32: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

available atarchived at

See, e.g. supra

See, e.g. Spurring Job Growth Through Capital Formation While Protecting Investors: Hearings Before the S. Comm. on Banking, Hous. & Urban Affairs

But seeCapital Markets Relief: JOBS (Jumpstart Our Business Startups) Act Eases Regulatory

Barriers to IPOs and Other Capital Raising Alternatives

archived at

Page 33: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Constructing the IPO Database

See supra

See infra

See IPO SCOOP Rating Scorecard archived at

See supra

See EDGAR Company Filings

archived at see also supra

See Division of Corporation Finance: Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code List

Page 34: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Changes in IPO Volume After JOBS

archived at

See Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act Frequently Asked Questions supra

Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time? SeeFounding Dates for 9,902 Firms Going Public in the U.S. During 1975-2014

archived at

See infra

See supra

Page 35: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See

Page 36: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

IPO Volume by EGC Status

Total Pre-JOBS 178 156 87.6%

Total Post-JOBS 270 229 84.8%

Page 37: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

greater

Adoption of Scaled Disclosure by EGCs

See supra

See infraSee infraSee supra

Page 38: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Filing of a Confidential Draft Registration Statement

See supra See supra

See supra

See supra See supra

See supra See supraSee infra

Page 39: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

IPOs by EGCs Finalized in Post-JOBS Period

Period N

Filed

Conf. S-1

2-years

audited

2-years

selected

2-CDA

tables

§107

Opt-Out

See infra

Page 40: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

IPOs by EGCs Commenced in Post-JOBS Period

Period N

Filed

Conf. S-1

2-years

audited

2-years

selected

2-CDA

tables

§107

Opt-Out

Financial & Executive Compensation Disclosure

See infra See supra

Page 41: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Compliance with Revised Accounting Standards

See supra See supra See supra

See supra

Page 42: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Id.See supra

See supra

See, e.g.available at

archived at

See e.g.available at

archived at

see alsoavailable at

archived at

See available at

Page 43: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Scaled Disclosure & Issuer Characteristics

archived at

available at

archived at

See, e.g.available at

archived at

See, e.g. supra

See, e.g. id.

See, e.g. available at

archived at

supra

Page 44: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See supra

See infra

See infra

See supra

See infra

See supraSee Division of Corporation Finance:

Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code List supra See infra

Page 45: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Financial Disclosure & IPO Characteristics

See supraSee supra

Page 46: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Characteristics of Small IPO Issuers

See supraSee supra

Page 47: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Overview of Findings

See supra

See supra

See supra

See supra See supra

See supra

Page 48: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

The Costs of Going Public After JOBS

Regulatory Compliance Costs

See, e.g. Revisiting the Voting Prohibition in Bond Workouts available at

The Evolution of Contractual Terms in Sovereign Bonds

See supra

See

Page 49: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

IPO Regulatory Compliance Costs

Post-JOBS

Pre-JOBS

See supra See supra

Page 50: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Underwriters’ Spread

Ex ante

See supra

See infra See supraSee supraSee infra

Page 51: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

See supraSee The Effect of the JOBS Act on Underwriting Spreads

Page 52: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Underwriting Spreads

Post-JOBS

Pre-JOBS

See supra

See supra

see id.

Page 53: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

IPO Underpricing

See supraSee supra

See, e.g.Do Investment Banks Compete in IPOs?: The Advent of the “7% Plus Contract ”

See infra See infra See supraSee supra

Page 54: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See supraSee supra

SeeSee supra

See supra

Page 55: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Underpricing

Post-JOBS

Pre-JOBS

See supra See, e.g.

supra see also supra

See supra

Page 56: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Overview of Findings

See supra

See supra

See infra

Page 57: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Being Public After JOBS

See supra

SeeThe Costs and Benefits of Mandatory Securities Regulation: Evidence from

Market Reactions to the JOBS Act of 2012 available at

archived at

See id.See supra

See, e.g.available at

archived at

available at

archived at

Page 58: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See supra

See, e.g.supra

Seeavailable at

, archived at

Seeavailable at

archived at

See supra

See supra

Page 59: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

available at

archived at

See supraSee supra

See supra

Page 60: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

See, e.g.While IPOs Soar, Many Firms Prefer to Stay Away

Page 61: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Yi = + 1EGCi + 2 PostJOBSi + 3EGCi *PostJOBSi + 4j ji + i (1)

i EGCi

Post-JOBSi

EGCi*PostJOBSi

Zji

Regulatory Compliance Costs and Underwriters’ Spread

RegCosti

See supraSee supraSee supra

Page 62: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Spreadi

PostJOBS + EGC*PostJOBS

EGC*PostJOBS

Underpricing of IPOs

IPOReti

ii. IPOReti

EGC Post-JOBS

EGC

supra

supra

See supra

See infra

Page 63: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

Post-JOBS

PostJOBS + EGC*PostJOBS

EGC*PostJOBS

See supra See infra

See infra

See infra

Page 64: Going Public After the JOBS Act

OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL

Direct Offering Costs in Pre- and Post-JOBS Periods

SmallPost-JOBS

LogRevenuesLogProceeds

.

Page 65: Going Public After the JOBS Act

GOING PUBLIC AFTER THE JOBS ACT

IPO Returns During the Pre- and Post-JOBS Periods

ii

SmallPost-JOBS

LogRevenues

LogProceeds

.

Page 66: Going Public After the JOBS Act