32D12SEM40 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 010

REPORT ON

GOEPHYSICAL SURVEYS

PERFORMED ON

101 CLAIM GROUP

HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIP

LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION

MATHESON AREA - ONTARIO

RECEIVEDJUl 2 21982

MINING LANDS SECTION

FOR

H. E. NEAL

BY

PETER G. ATHERTON B.Se.

H. E. NEAL 6. ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO ~ CANADA

July, 1982

32Dt2SE004e 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

3.0 THE PROPERTY

4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK

6.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY

7.0 GEOPHYSICS

7.1 Magnetic Survey7.1.1 Instrument and Sensitivity7.1.2 The Survey

7.2 The Electromagnetic Survey7.2.1 Instrument and Sensitivity7.2.2 The Survey

8.0 RESULTS

8.1 Magnetic Survey

8.2 VLF-EM Survey

9.0 CONCLUSIONS

CERTIFICATE

777

889

11

11

12

13

1.0 SUMMARY

H. E. Neal S Associates Ltd. were contracted to conduct ground magnetic

and VLF-EM surveys over the 101 group of claims by Mr. H. E. Neal in

Holloway Township.

The VLF-EM survey using the Cutler, Maine station located 6 possible

conductors. Most of these conductors appear to be the result of outcrop

ridges or buried ridges. Conductor H-l appears to be located on the

possible northern extension of the Ghostmount Fault.

The magnetic survey outlined the northeasterly trend of the geological

structure. The possible southern contact of the Destor-Porcupine Fault

zone is located in the northern part of the claims. Other strike faults

and North-South faults are also enterpreted from the magnetics.

To further evaluate the property a geological survey is proposed later

in 1982. Maps at a scale of l" to 200' for magnetometer and VLF-EM

surveys accompany this report.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION

H. E. Neal S Associates were contracted to conduct ground VLF-EM and

magnetic surveys over 10 claims held by Mr. H. E. Neal in Holloway

Township.

The Jean Alix Co. Ltd. was sub-contracted to cut and chain 10.4 miles of

lines which included an east-west baseline 9,000 feet in length. Cross

lines were cut every 400'. A two man field crew conducted ground VLF-EM

and magnetic surveys over this grid during March 1982. This field crew

was based in Holtyre, Ontario located 26 miles west of the property.

The ground magnetic survey was conducted using a Scintrex MF-l Fluxgate

magnetometer while the VLF-EM survey was conducted with a Geonics EM-16

using the VLF-EM frequency for the Cutler, Maine station.

The results are shown in this report and are to be applied for assessment

credits on all 10 claims.

/r

9

4

ONTARIOQUE.

*\NEAL CLAIMS

KIRKLAND LAKE

!00 ?00

M ITS3or

H E NEAL a ASSOCIATES LTD

TIMMINS

KIFIKLAND LAKE

LOCATION

SCALE 1 in. To

H.E. MEAL A ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 3 -

3.0 THE PROPERTY

The property consists of 10 contiguous claims in Holloway Township.

The claims are held by H. E. Neal, 124 Roxborough Drive, Toronto, Ontario.

The claims are listed below:

L598637 to L598646

2M.—t—

3M-4-

l l

31814 | *12*23 |*9t*2( ,j*ac

)28I* 1(3(819

i-. t ,v T^^ rr^1 ' ' .032504J6J2i05 'e325!5

JL -J l L ^1 liT."---rL ---rL ~ ~ TL ~ ~-ri - "-jr ~ - ,r ~ it -"rr- \r - -1l ' J ^ l ' 1632507 l 6" 508 I"!?0.!'6 *? 1-! 0-l,,,, , 0 "6284 -t* 1632501 I63t 502 I6SZ503 '632 906 | , . ' *~~ ~ ~ L L

' ' ' ' ^ t- ~ ~ t ~ ~ - -f' L . *- l H 5 795 86 j

a ' o *. ^

iS79593'579590 i

(?2 |57I665 j5796*2

56805(41566095 1566056

1*79659 1979658* 34 , .M844 jse*i*' 13001*.J - - -

568196 J566I57 [5,9,58^6i- 15 -M062 599051 ,59909,0 |S99049 I5^046J588I94 1588155'S9905S l, l v J \ ' l l

..- t-.-H---, -r-.,-.-,.,-,.-..

'

---.. , r 4-^ ( -..-^---. . . .

l ' - ^5990271599026 '693025 '99*0241

l l l

j S880I9 |5*tOtO|8880tl 8*90 22

--u-l-l--'-^-l t. l

5S8IC3 JS68I64 (S88IC5l 69904i, 15*9045 J999044 , 89,04v g [ 999 04.'l,l59904' |i6dlCI J586I6.'"J"U""~ ,~i ri" i L~"*7~L~'\T" L"""r i"~T~r~i ' \ i ! i ,' ' ' ' i i i

P)\59 4039 99*034 1999033 '9*903? i39*0 t3lM;*90:0 I588H* '586169 |588I70 '568171 156*172\ l l j \i MclntyrkL , l l

588IC6

l l

•* *J* T- —tX L . r586170

I8?'58SI83

-.. -L....l. - .J^ r L i t [-r-1*99013 I5990J2 j59sOII , ll l 5881871589188l J l""""""""""""""""""

( 566575 538574 p88575 '999010 ,5*8I92 1588193

n's86570 1583569 l 58856B|888367 '986197 1586196W l , l li

l'T '

588177 (588176 '588179

L L

568184 1588165 1586186 l l

^ _ _ i L i L ril l l

.—.x-..,L...L J L J -L

t l 586194 {368199 1986196

-r-j-t |-r-688189 1568012 '586013

bMOC958fl

,| 588 160 ,i3804J '5B

l

BI67 i58804B|ibl

l

568173 ! 5BSI T 4

. — - -I..

588i80 I538I8

11190 '588291 19968*1 156*9(3 J588S64 888565 1588566- [- - L- —j- -7.- -h -f - -| - I'", ~ V ' 1 - I' -

1583014 158:

l l

588559 588358 1588357 1588019 '58

|538554 \iii'. 5? I538.-56 536024 I58S

l L l

l

'.88553 i58355l I588028 J58(

101 GROUP

HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIP

PROPERTY MAPSCALE 1 To 1/2 Mile

H.E, NEAL A ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 4 -

4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS

The 10 claims are located on Holloway Township, District of Cochrane,

in the Larder Lake Mining Division.

The west side of the claim group is located 26 miles north-east of

the town of Holtyre.

Access to the property is east along Highway 101 to Holloway Lake in

Holloway Township. The claims are located 700' south of the Highway

at this point and are accessible by foot.

- 5 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK

1949 - Lobanor Gold Mines Limited drilled 5 diamond drill holes totalling

5,129 feet. Four were drilled on claims held by H. E. Neal.

1960 - Revere Mining Corporation Ltd. conducted ground magnetic and

electrical resistivity surveys over claims held by them. Work

also included 7 drill holes totalling 3,121 feet. This work also

included claims now held by H. E. Neal.

1952 - J. Satterly from the Ontario Department of Mines mapped the

northern part of Holloway Township which also includes the

H. E. Neal claims.

- 6 -

6.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY

The rocks in Holloway Township are Archean in age and belong to the

Abitibi Sub-Province of the Superior Province. The rocks are mainly

Keewatin andesite and basalt with some interflow sediment. A wide

band of sediments occurs roughly parallel to Highway 101 across the

township. The northwestern part of the township is underlain by

mafic to ultramafic intrusives that make up part of the Ghost Range

Syncline.

The rocks face south and dip south at 80 or steeper. The rocks generally

trend east north-east.

The major structural feature in the township is the Destor-Porcupine Fault

Zone which is roughly parallel to and in the vicinity of Highway 101. Some

cross faulting does occur in the township but is usually obscured by

extensive overburden.

The overburden covers approximately 80% of the township and has reported

thickness up to 150'.

A table of formations from Satterly (1953) is shown on the following page.

CKNOZOIC RECENT:i'l.EISTOCENE:

I'RKCAMBKIAN KK WEEN A WAN:

MATACHEWAN:

Al.I.OMAN:

l lBE-Ai.r.oMAN:

KEEWATIN:

Volcanics:

Sediments:

Table of Formations

I'eat: stream deposits.Sand, gravel, boulders; varved clay.

Cirral unconformity

Quartz dialuse.Intmsit* contact

Quartz diabase, diabase.Jntrush* contact

Feldsjvir porphyry; felsite; lamprophyre.Intrusiif contact

Diataise, gabbro; peridotite and dunite (seriK'iiiini/ed); pyroxenite.

Jntrusii* cuntact

I'Rhyolite; rhyolite a^nlonifniu1 and tulT. Andt'site, basalt; pillow lava; diabasic lava; spherulitic lava; frag

mental lava (How breccia or a^loim-ratr); lull and chert; laic- rhiorite schist; carbonate-chlorile schist,

Faulted contact Greywacke; slate; conglomerate; iron formation.

J. Satterly (1953).

7.0 GEOPHYSICS

7.1 Magnetic Survey

7.1.1 Instrument and Sensitivity

The instrument used was a Fluxgate magnetmeter, Model MF-1, manufactured

by Scintrex Limited, It has an accuracy of *0^ from the l,OOOT.to 10,000 f

gamma scale and an accuracy of *1.0/^ at scales greater than 10,000 gammas.

The Fluxgate magnetometer measures the strength of the vertical component

of the total magnetic field. The resulting value is given in gammas.

The magnetic field at any given station will consist of the sum of the

earth's magnetic field and the magnetic field of the bedrock at that

point. The magnetic field of the bedrock is dependent on the concentration

of naturally magnetic minerals in the bedrock or minerals-capable of

possessing a secondary field which is induced by the earth's primary

magnetic field.

7.1.2 The Survey

The magnetic survey was conducted during March 1982 by Dwain Parks over

the entire claim group. Readings were taken at 25' intervals along all

cross lines and at 50' intervals along the baseline. The cross lines were

cut at 400' intervals perpendicular to the baseline. The main base

station for the grid was located on the baseline at 36E with secondary

base stations located on the baseline at 800' intervals.

- 8 -

relative to 36E.

Due to fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field, it is necessary to

make diurnal corrections in order to bring all readings to a common base,

To accomplish this, readings were recorded and a series of base stations

were established along the baseline. These were tied into a base

station. Crosslines were completed in tandem as loops with the first

and last reading corresponding with one baseline station. Even though

different base stations were used, all stations recorded on the grid

could be corrected relative to each other.

The contoured results of the magnetic survey aid in the determination

of strike, dip, location and shape of a magnetic body.

7.2 The Electromagnetic Survey

7.2.1 Instrument and Sensitivity

The instrument used in the survey was a Geonics EM16 VLF-EM. The

sensitivity of the In-phase is *15C^ and Quad-phase is *4070 . The

instrument has a resolution of +17,, The Geonics EM16 has an operating

range of 15 to 25 KHz VLF operating band.

The EM16 is a sensitive receiver which measures the vertical field

components of secondary magnetic fields caused in the following manner.

- 9 -

The VLF transmitting stations have a vertical antenna with a vertical

antenna current. This creates a concentric-horizontal magnetic field

around each station. When the magnetic fields come in contact with

conductive bodies in the ground a secondary magnetic field radiates

from these bodies.

The receiver has two receiving coils with one coil having a vertical axis

and the other a horizontal axis. The signal from the vertical axis

coil is minimized by tilting the instrument which measures the vertical

real component as a percentage. The remaining signal is balanced out

by a measured percentage of a signal from the horizontal coil which gives

an accurate measure of the quadrature vertical signal. The measured

values are relative only.

The VLF station N.A.A., Cutler, Maine was chosen because it is in line

with the strike of the rocks in the area. The results of a survey

when plotted as a profile show the location of various conductors in

the ground.

7.2.2 The Survey

The VLF-EM survey was carried out by C. Curry during March, 1982. This

was part of the overall exploration program conducted by H. E. Neal (x

Associates Ltd. in Holloway Township. The survey was conducted over the

same grid system as the magnetometer survey. Readings were recorded at

- 10 -

50' intervals along the crosslines and recorded as facing north. No

readings were systematically taken along the baseline other than those

that coincided with the Junction of the baseline and cross over lines.

The VLF transmitting station used was N.A.A Cutler, Maine, which has

a transmitting frequency of 17.8 KHz.

- 11 -

8.0 RESULTS

8.1 Magnetic Survey

The magnetic survey revealed the basic trend of the rocks to be in a

northeast southwest direction and dipping steeply to the south.

The magnetic low located in the northwest corner of claim L598641 is

probably due to underlying sediments. The southern contact of this

magnetic low could be the part of the Destor-Porcupine Fault zone or

the Ghostmount Fault which are two major strike faults in the township.

The magnetic low occurring on the north part of claims L598637 and

L598638 is probably due to underlying sediments. This band of

sediments is thought to be sheared and is probably within the

Destor-Porcupine Fault zone.

The magnetic low underlying the south half of the claim group is due

to underlying andesite. There is enough drill hole and outcrop

evidence to support this assumption.

The band of magnetic highs separating the two magnetic lows is probably

due to basalt flows and/or mafic sills that are common in the area.

These bands of magnetic highs are continuous except in the area between

L32E and L56E near the baseline where a strike fault appears to intersect

the rock units. This part of the property is also cut by a north-south

fault probably located west of line 36E.

The small magnetic high on lines 72E and 76E in claim L598645 is likel;

a small mafic intrusion.

- 12 -

8.2 VLF-EM Survey

The VLF-EM survey located 6 conductors. These were assigned numbers f om

H-l to H-6.

Conductors H-4, 5 and 6 are probably caused by outcrop ridges or buried

ridges as they occur in an outcrop area. The profiles have a negative

slope before becoming positive and this is usually indicative of outcrop

ridges and buried ridges.

Conductor H-3 is located on lines 68E and 72E where they cross the

Mattawasaga River, This could be the cause of the conductor or it

could be caused by a combination of buried ridge and the river. The

latter is more likely as the river generally is not marked by such a strong

conductor.

Conductor H-2 is also likely caused by a buried ridge. The profile of

this conductor does not have the strong negative slope that conductors

H-4, 5 and 6 have and may have another cause.

Conductor H-l is located on claim L598641. This conductor shows

characteristics that suggest it is caused by a buried outcrop ridge.

It is also located on the possible extension of the Ghostmount Fault

and could be caused by differences in conductivity between rock types.

- 13 -

9.0 CONCLUSIONS

The magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys were useful in determining the

geological structure. The magnetics also gave a broad indication of

the rock types underlying the claim group. The rocks were shown by

the magnetics to trend northeast-southwest and to be dipping south.

The magnetics suggest the presence of the southern contact of the

Destor-Porcupine Fault zone in the north part of the claim group

and that the shear zone is following a band of sedimentary rocks in

a northeasterly direction. A strike fault is indicated between lines

32E and 56E and trending slightly southeast and a possible north-south

trending cross fault occurs west of line 36E.

Most of the VLF-EM conductors show characteristics that suggest they

are caused by outcrop or buried ridges. Conductor H-l although also

showing this characteristic is also located along the possible northern

extension of the Ghostmount Fault and may be caused by differences in

conductivity between rock types.

A detailed geological survey is recommended for this claim group in an

effort to further evaluate the rest of the VLF-EM conductors and a

geological survey could possibly provide a better explanation for their

existence.

Peter G. Atherton B.Se.

H. E. Neal S Associates Ltd.

CERTIFICATE

I, Peter G. Atherton of 5425 Croydon Road, Burlington, Ontario, do

hereby certify:

1) That I graduated from Brock University in 1975 and have practised

my profession since that time.

2) That I have no interest directly or indirectly nor do I expect to

have any interest in the properties held by H. E. Neal.

3) My report is based on personal examination of the property and

supervision of the surveys being conducted on the property.

Toronto, Ontario

July, 1982

Peter G. Atherton B. Se.

Ontario eocnemical and Expenditures)

32Diaseee4e a.495i HOLLOWAY

/y J, S.J^T^ s si j j O'.- .

900

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

[bate of Survey (from 81 to) l /J c.j r J. l 3(:

_l Day l Mo. | ft. \ Day | Mo. | Yr.

..— ."[Total Miles of line Cut

Mr. | ________________

t C&7 7'(J.v~.;ry t'.-^r. /vi' c. ,v '(,-Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemicai

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

JL12—

^'2^,.

Days per Claim

Days perClaim

Expenditures (exclType of Work PerforRECEIVEDPerformed on Claim(s) JIW -

MINING LANDS SECTIONCalculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Date

//v/.;/Recorded (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Prefix

L

lining ClaimNumber

Expend. Days Cr.

lining ClaimPrefix Number

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by thit report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Poital Address of Person Certifying

l . /, ,\ ^ v ^ t--*-* , f s C i /'

fitd Cert.fitd

Ministryof Geotechnicalpries Report

Ontario _ Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

l Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

|| Approved [~] Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

[ ) Approved fi Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

1982 07 30 2.4951

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sirs

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims L 598637 et al in the Township of Holloway.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.

YOurs very truly.

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phones 416/965-1316

J. Skurarsc

cct H.E. Neal i Associates Limited Toronto, Ontario Attni Peter Atherton

H. E. MEAL 8. ASSOCIATES LTD.Mineral Consultants

Ste. 607, b5 Queen Street East, Toronto, Canada M5C 1 RG Telephone: (416) 368-0166

July 20, 1982

Mr. F,. F. AndersonDirectorLands Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3

Dear Sir:

Enclosed please find the following property reports submitted for assessment i rork credits by H. E. Neal and Associates Ltd. on behalf of Mr. H. E. Neal.

1) 2 copies - Geophysical Surveys Performed on the 101 Claim Group, Holloway Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Matheson Area-Ontario (two ground magnetometer maps and two VLF-EM maps - scale l" to 200' accompanying each report).

Please note that in the Report of Work Form sent to the Mining Recorder's Office for the Larder Lake Mining Division and received by them May 26, 1982, it was stated that Mr. H. E. Neal would by the author of the accompanying report. Due to unforeseen difficulties encountered by Mr. Neal he was not able to write the report. It was therefore left to me to write the report. Please note this in your records and if there are problems because of this change please Jet me know at the above address.

Respectfully submitted,

X? f c.

Peter G. Atherton B.Se.H. E. Neal d Associates Ltd.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Sg

lb O

Type of Siirvey(s) Magnetometer and VLF-EM

Township or Area Holloway Township

Claim HolHer(s) H. E. Neal- -

Survey Company H- E. Neal 6. Associates Ltd.

Author of Report Peter G. Atherton

Address of Author c/o H. E. Neal b Associates. 607-55 QueenStreet E., Toronto., Ontario

Covering Dates of Survey March 13. 1982 to July 20. 1982(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line r.nt 10-4 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

Electromagnetic-

Magnetometer......

Radiometric. ,,,....

-Other

Oeologiral

nenrhemiral

DAYS per claim

20

20

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic, . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATR- July 20. 1982 SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications c)

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

L598637 '(prefix)""""

L598638(number)

.L598.63.9..

.L59.864.Q.,

L598641i**!***********!*

i * Hi* ̂ *rtK*tn*

,.L.5.9.864.5..

...L.5.9.8M&;

TOTAL CLAIMS-HL

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Station. Magnetometer 1990 VLF-EM 905 rj..mhPr of Readings Mae 1990 VLF-EM 905

Station interval M*g 25' S. 50 ' VLF-EM 50'_________Line sparing 400'———-————————————

Profile s™ le VLF in to ±40^—^—^^^——-.^.^.^..^————^,^-^—-^————.,.———. Contour interval Mag 100 gammas-—————.^-^——^-—————.———————.——-——.——-

Instrument SCINTREX MF-1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER-—^——————.———.——..——..————-

O

sS

o

Accuracy — Scale constant jft'5% from 1000 gamma to 10,000 gamma scale S +l% for greaterDiurnal correction method BL reading #1 - BL reading #2 divided by # of reaHlngg 10*000 gammas,

n . , , . . progressive adjustment. 0 , Base Station check-in interval (nours)_______________z hours—^^———-—^—^—————————-—Base Station location and value BL 36+OOE 690 gammas

Instrument ____GEONICS EM16 VLF-EMCoil configuration 2 coils l vertical 1 hnr-l7.nnt*tl- ., . NACoil separation ——-——...—-^--————.—^———————-—.Accuracy ______resolution of

Method: OD Fixed transmitter D Shoot back CD In line EH Parallel lineFrequency_____N.A.A. Cutler, Maine 1? T ft KHy________________________________

{specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measurer! INPHASE Si

InstrumentScale constant .

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

XOH N̂5<0o,QWu)~JQ ZHH

JHH1— (

>*-H

Ht/5i—* CO

Pii

Method D Time Domain CD Frequency DomainParanvtp" On timp Frequency

Off \m\e Range. ...,, ..— Delay time . . . ,,

— Intpprati^n timeo

Power .... ..., - . —————————————————————————

Electrode array ————— - ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————Electrode spacing ———— - ————————————————————————————————————————— — — - ———————————

Tyne of elertrode , _ ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————— - ———

SELF POTENTIALInstrument^——^————-—-..——-.^—--—-...—.———.——.—..—.—^—..—....— Range. Survey Method -^—————————^—^———-———--.^---—^--^^-——..-.——-—.-.^——.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)———.--——^—-————.———...——.—.^—..—...—....—-..^——— Height of instrument—-————--—.——-—-—-..—-———.—..—.—Background Count. Size of detector.^--———^-^-——-———^——^——.—-—^——-.————-—^..^—..^.—.^

Overburden ————————————-——-.-———-——-—.—--—.-——.——.————^....-.—(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey-—^——^——^———^-———————————

Instrument ——-——-——-^^———-—-.———-—.——. Accuracy—————--——--—-,———————-^———^—Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-———-^—-—————————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.—-—.—————-—————————.——.—-.—...-.—.

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude——--————.—--—-.--.-..——-—.——...—-..—..^^— Line Sparing

Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight_______ Method of Collection________

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain———————

Drainage Development,———————————Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Others _________________________-—Field Analysis (-

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ————————.——

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -———-

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General- General .

K)in

O:SI-

o: LU

FRECHEVILLE TWP M.348

L t Lo l l L

, 52549 l '5254921•r !r 661910 1661909 663729

~~~~f L l L

""" es*82t". j 525494 [525493 i L

.T ~ 'le?84 -6*1632501 1632 50 2 1632503 '632506

- — - f -- - L |L

628048(6280

- L , L it

579593' 579590 '^ 43078 \ 43079 6e2 eio .682809HOI9 \M088

(27Z2Z)\ 596260

~\—————^ 9863 ®

'579591 57958^579587

5988 l 2 l 596613 598611

598644 1598645 598646

S^k^OS^VAj-Ztr ' 4- T! — -VM*H^-V^*34843 —

.^586070 i 56807) i 588072 | 588073J3OD*t3l . . _ _ _~"~~ "5B805 (4 1588055 1588056 588057

588038 88039 [588040 5B9Q4\ ^588042

L i—^ 'i i^l ^" 15-99052,599051 |59905.0 |599049 533048 588156 58BI 57 ,588I58 J588154 I58BI55

6 ' It 8 l l5.9:! ?.5J^--.--^ __ --H--- T l L -T L l L .L

588043 588044588046 ' Yclle--~'"-'"--- — l--— —i-'J^ -v' t-.

588048i583049{568050 ld|C| M816 ,59904 5 9904, 599044'

P)\59 ^9035 ^99034 1599033 I5b903? |59dO (siJ.'S39030 I588|(ift '588169 |588I70 '588171 1588172lL l

\ l i '5^029,599028 599027)599026 L?5 J 588176 ] 588|77 568178 538 ,79 568.80 1586,8,588251 [58/8252L—— ["-IT— hT~!-r— hi" -L"

58802058802I '599022 ! 599023 533 13?'583I83 '588184 1588185 1588186

i j ~ -. i.\j L oL-*. - ——-

O \ '"i I0220A "O V.

5681871583183 '568189 1588190 '588191538264 .588263 |5t!8262

588573 '538574 |S88575 1599010 J588I92 '583193 i 588 194 J588I95 | 588)96

,,L. ____,... .!__,,_____ ' ..J. ____ ! .., L-. '.. ©l L J L , L l L j L j" L l L ( L "j u ~f L ~

0218 j S)J588ft70 1589569 158856 8| 588567 '538197 1588198 J588IB9 I58S012 '588013

3997 /' ^^.l.?i____,J___..l,...' ____ l ..^..{...^i,___1^....

III 1588015 J5880I6 |5880I7 15880161588283 |583290 '588291 158856^ 1586563 1538564 588565

578850 1578848 ;578849i .

588561 588560 l 00"! i —— -, l53 3289 568 292 l 588559 588558 1588557 1588019 ' 598020 15880 21 '5880221583023

l l l l l l -——-L---*----l ._J____l__ l l

L l L l L

588284 158828^

1536286538554 533L 55 l5S8o56 538024 1588025 P 588026 ;58B027

5B8553 1568552 .588551 '583028 '588 r i* i

588548 i 588^49 |588550588469 588470 '588477

588468 1588471 '588476 1588540 1588539,588538 '588544 536546

588467 1588472 588475 588541 588542 (538543

588391 588466 |568473 '588474 i 156228

l l ' 1620140 1620104 '620097(562282 ,

aJ620I70 ,642623.6426Z4 J642625 ^

TANNAHILL TWP M. 390

32D12SEW4B 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 200

MOTES

400 sur1;i(,(; lights n;sofvalion along Ihe shores of all

DATE OF ISSUE

f SB - 3 1983

Ministry of Natural ResourcesTORONTO

LEGEND

! J Mi Mt.iJ LAND

F -A, ! i ,f , i,' f) f OH iiUHf-ACf R i (-.M I S ONLY

1. 1 A -L

Lil.'.: N:,! UK uCCUI'A! k'N

Cfi-.WN LAND SALE l-

LCK'.AU D LAND

CANCELLED

WININO Minim, c. 'M vSUP! -Ci: HIGH I i-i ONl V

HIGHWAY ,1 POUTL" N'.;

HOAOS

T MAIL i,

HAILWA1L

ruvvi/n LINE.;.

(P) or

e

(DLO.C'3.

Loc,

C.

M M O.

S.H.O.

TOWNSHIP OF

HOLLOWAYDISiniCTOK

COCHRANE

LARDER LAKEMINIMI. DIVISION

3CALL : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE)

PLAMARCH 7Z M. 356

-.'ATljRAL RESOURCES

32D12SE0e4a 2.495 l HOLLOWAY

10 W

Mag,

LEGEND

1200 V

1000V

800 r

600*

400*

200 *

O*

SYMBOLS

Base station

Contour Interval 100*

INSTRUMENT

SCINTREX MF 1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER

KEY MAP

r

\

101 GROUPOF

H.E. MEAL

GROUND MAGNETOMETERSURVEY

LOT CONC.

HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE

200 O MM H

200

l INCH TO ?00 FFt'T

400 600 FCf. T

H.E. NEAL S. ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:

DRAWING No. DATE;

AY 1981

32DiaSE8848 8.4951 HOLLOWAY

10 W

Mag.•iff

LEGEND

1200*

1000*

800*

600*

400 y200 r

O *

SYMBOLS

Base station A *

Contour Interval 100

INSTRUMENT

SCINTREX MF 1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER

KEY MAP

\

SC

101 GROUPOF

H.E. NEAL•i

GROUND MAGNETOMETER

SURVEYLOT CONC.

HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE

200 Ol l-l l-Tl-J H bi.

200 400 600 FEET

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:

DRAWING No, DATE:MAY 1981

vNa

32D12SEM48 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 230

Mag.

SYMBOLS

-—— In-phase

-—- Quadrature

Vertical Scale: 1 mohs 14096

INSTRUMENT

GEONICS EM16 VLF-EM

STATION: NAA Cutler.Maine

Frequency 17.8 kHz

VLF CONDUCTOR:

KEY MAP

,,, r

\\

101 GROUPOF

H.E. MEAL

CUTLER

GROUND VLF - EM SURVEY

LOT CONC.

HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE

200 200"JrJ M

400 600 FEET

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H,E. NEAL 8. ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO CAMADA

DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:

DRAWING No. DATE:MAY 1981

2.4951 HOLLOWAY

L 88 E

240

110 W.

Mag.

SYMBOLS

In-phase

Quadrature

Vertical Scale: 1 inch* t

INSTRUMENT

GEONICS EM16 VLF-EM

STATION: NAA Cutler, Maine

Frequency 17.8 kHz

VLF CONDUCTOR:

KEY MAP

101 GROUPOF

H.E. NEAL

CUTLER GROUND VLF - EM SURVEY

LOT CONC.

HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT* OF COCHRANE

200 O l M l-J M M 1-1"

200 400 600 FEET

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:

DRAWING No. DATE:MAY 1981