Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL & ECONOMIC BENEFITS
of INTRODUCING R744
MOBILE AIR CONDITIONING
1MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
MOBILE AIR CONDITIONING
Armin Hafner & Petter NeksåSINTEF Energy Research
TrondheimNorway
Outline
� Introduction�Environmental Impact of MAC�Latest development achievements�Economic Issues of R744 MAC
2MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
�Economic Issues of R744 MAC�LCCP
� Input values� Results, case study: India and China
�Summary
Introduction� CO2 applied as refrigerant (R744) is classified as non-toxic
and non flammable� Revival of R744 Technology started in 1988 @ SINTEF /
NTNU� Many institutes and companies do have a successful
R744 development
3MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
� Funding provided by EU: � RACE (1995-97); � B-Cool (2005-2008)
� EU MAC directive (70/156/EEC) adopted in May 2006� LCCP*; an upgrade of the earlier applied TEWI** analysis� German car makers choose R744, see www.R744.com***
* LCCP: Life Cycle Climate Performance** TEWI: Total Equivalent Warming Impact***Industry leading web site on CO2 technology
Environmental Impact of MAC
�Direct Emissions; Related to GWP:
� Leak tight assembly line equipment, MAC systems, service equipment, etc.
� Applying low GWP, non-toxic refrigerants
4MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
5MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Environmental Impact of MAC
�Indirect Emissions; Related to Fuel Consumption:� Active control of evaporator temperature
� according to the required cooling demand of the passenger compartment.
� Improved front end designs
6MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
� Improved front end designs� decrease the inlet air temperature to the heat rejection device,
especially during idle condition.
� Automatic air recirculation control� reduction of fresh (hot) air flow rate into the passenger
compartment to a reasonable level
� Provide shade for the cars, when parking
Development achievements
�Compressor efficiency
7MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Hrnjak 2006 (MAC-Summit)
1989-92 Kooperation SINTEF / Hydro
� Hauptziel: Energieeffizienz der ersten CO2 Kfz-Klimaanlage
8MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Latest development achievements
�HFC-134a / R744;variable displacement compressor
9MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Wolf (2007)
10MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Development achievements
�System PerformanceWieschollek and Heckt (2007) investigated the fuel
consumption of a Toyota Yaris equipped with a 1.0 dm3
petrol engine, a conventional HFC MAC system and an R744 MAC system.
11MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Applying the R744 MAC system reduced the additional fuel consumption due to AC by:25%, 0,56 dm3/100km in a NEDC at 35 °C ambient temperature (HFC134a 1.97 dm3/100km versus R744 1.41 dm3/100km).
Economic Issues of R744 MAC
� Acceptance criteria for low cost R744 MAC:� Simple control strategy
� Increased noise level during operation of MAC system accepted
� Limited number of flexible lines applied in the system, mainly ‘full flexible Al-lines’ and Al-flexible lines to reduce system cost.
� Features of High class R744 MACs:
12MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
� Features of High class R744 MACs:� Automatic control (evaporator pressure according to demand, high side
pressure at optimum level) � High energy efficiency due to externally controlled variable displacement
compressor� Improved air flow across exterior heat exchanger
� Cost efficient servicing� Next generation vehicles
Fuel over-consumption due to MAC
� Examples from Europe� Medium size car I: Fuel consumption
according to 99/100-7EG:5,8 l/100km� Medium size car II:OE -> Touran 1.9 TDI
Small cars:
13MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
� Visteon -> Yaris 3 cylinders 1.0 l, 51 kW
Medium size car, Europe I
14MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Medium size car, Europe II
15MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Medium size car, Europe II
co
ns
um
pti
on
[l/
10
0k
m]
NEDC Fuel over-consumption HFC-134a versus R744
16MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Fu
el
ove
r-c
on
su
mp
tio
n [
l/1
00
km
]
Ambient Temperature [°C]
Europe: Small car I
17MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
http://www.vda-wintermeeting.de/fileadmin/downloads2007/12-FlorianWieschollek_Visteon.pdf
18MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
An
nu
al
dri
vin
g &
h
ou
rs /
year
h/a km driven km driven AC on
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
� Annual driving
� Distance driven
� Distance driven AC on
19MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0-5
5-10
10-1
5
15-2
0
20-2
5
25-3
0
30-3
5
35-4
0
40-4
5
45-5
0
Ambient temperature [°C]
An
nu
al
dri
vin
g &
h
ou
rs /
year
New Delhi Ambient temperature [°C]
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
input values, direct emissions, Asia / Europe Asia Europe
GHG emission due to production of refrigerant (kg CO2 /kg HFC) 10 10 System charge (g) 650 650 Annual Leakage (g/year) 40 25 Life time Services 5 3 End of Life (EoL) recovery rate (%) 801;2 801 EoL treatment; special waste crematory process (kg CO2/kg HFC) 50 50 Loss of remaining charge at service [%]: 202 20
20MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
1 As example to show sensitivity of EoL recovery: Athens & Shanghai 50%; Trondheim & New Delhi 0%
2 As worst case scenario; Bombay: 0% EoL recovery and 100 % loss of remaining charge at service.
Loss of remaining charge at service [%]: 202 20
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
� Most important input value:
ENERGY CONSUMPTION of MAC
NEDC@10°C NEDC@25°C NEDC@35°C NEDC@45°C
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
+ 0.29 dm3/100km
-> + 5 %
+ 0.18 dm3/100km
-> + 3 %
21MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Vehicle (Toyota Yaris) fuel consumption for NEDC, Wieschollek, F & Heckt, R. (2007)
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
HFC-134a MAC 5,69 6,65 7,38 7,89
R744 MAC 5,58 6,33 6,82 7,67
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
� Most important input value:
ENERGY CONSUMPTION of MAC
NEDC@10°C NEDC@25°C NEDC@35°C NEDC@45°C
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
+ 1.23 dm3/100km
-> + 23 %
+ 0.91 dm3/100km
-> + 17 %
22MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Vehicle (Toyota Yaris) fuel consumption for NEDC, Wieschollek, F & Heckt, R. (2007)
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
HFC-134a MAC 5,69 6,65 7,38 7,89
R744 MAC 5,58 6,33 6,82 7,67
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
� Most important input value:
ENERGY CONSUMPTION of MAC
NEDC@10°C NEDC@25°C NEDC@35°C NEDC@45°C
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
+ 1.97 dm3/100km
-> + 36 %
+ 1.41 dm3/100km
-> + 26 %
23MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Vehicle (Toyota Yaris) fuel consumption for NEDC, Wieschollek, F & Heckt, R. (2007)
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
HFC-134a MAC 5,69 6,65 7,38 7,89
R744 MAC 5,58 6,33 6,82 7,67
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
� Most important input value:
ENERGY CONSUMPTION of MAC
NEDC@10°C NEDC@25°C NEDC@35°C NEDC@45°C
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
+ 2.51 dm3/100km
-> + 47 %
+ 2.29 dm3/100km
-> + 43 %
24MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Vehicle (Toyota Yaris) fuel consumption for NEDC, Wieschollek, F & Heckt, R. (2007)
no MAC 5,4 5,42 5,41 5,38
HFC-134a MAC 5,69 6,65 7,38 7,89
R744 MAC 5,58 6,33 6,82 7,67
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
� Results, case study: India and China
8000
10000
2 eq
v.]
Bombay New Delhi Shanghai Beijing
HFC-134a R7443039
3509
2654
2500
3000
3500
4000
Fue
l con
sum
ptio
n [d
m3 ]
Bombay New Delhi Shanghai Beijing
25MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
0
2000
4000
6000
indirect direct indirect direct
LCC
P [k
g C
O2
2170
1040763
913669
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
HFC-134a R744F
uel c
onsu
mpt
ion
[dm
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
Results, case study: India and China
8000
10000
2 eq
v.]
Bombay New Delhi Shanghai Beijing
HFC-134a R744
� HFC MAC system emits GHG:� 10 to 14 metric tonnes (India)� 5 metric tonnes (China)
26MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
0
2000
4000
6000
indirect direct indirect direct
LCC
P [k
g C
O2
based on � 15.000 km/a� 15 years of driving
� 40% reduction if R744 is applied
LCCP (Life cycle climate performance)
Results, case study: India and China
3039
3509
2654
2500
3000
3500
4000
Fue
l con
sum
ptio
n [d
m3 ]
Bombay New Delhi Shanghai Beijing� HFC MAC requires fuel:
� 3039 - 3509 liters in (India)� 2170 - 2654 liters in (China)
27MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
2170
1040763
913669
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
HFC-134a R744F
uel c
onsu
mpt
ion
[dm
based on � 15.000 km/a� 15 years of driving
� 32 - 40% fuel savings if R744 is applied
Average fuel
5.4 l/100km
1 liter of petrol = 2,698 kg CO2
Annual driving: 12 500 km/a
Small EU car
Annual driving: 15 000 km/a
Small Indian car
NEDCNEDC
Emission trading?
28MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
Annual driving: 12 500 km/a
-> 675 l/a -> 1821 kgCO2/a
-> 146 gCO2/km (AC off)
-> 157 gCO2/km (R744 AC on)
-> 161 gCO2/km (HFC AC on)
Including HFC emissions:
-> 169 gCO2/km
Annual driving: 15 000 km/a
-> 810 l/a -> 2185 kgCO2/a
-> 146 gCO2/km (AC off)
-> 178 gCO2/km (R744 AC on)
-> 188 gCO2/km (HFC AC on)
Including HFC emissions:
-> 198 gCO2/km
-20g/km4514 kgCO2
157 gCO2/km (R744 AC on) – 30g/km = 127 gCO2/km
1550 g HFC lost
during 15 years
795 g HFC lost
During 12 years
30g/km =4514 kgCO2
Summary
The estimated fuel saving potential and reduction of GHG emissions per 1.000.000 cars by introducing R744 MAC systems instead of continuing with HFC 134a MAC units in Asia are:
� in New Delhi:
29MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
� in New Delhi:� 57.000 m3 of petrol � 300.000 metric tonnes of GHG emissions (CO2 eq.)
� in the Shanghai area: � 18.000 m3 of petrol� 172.000 metric tonnes of GHG emissions
Summary
R744 is the global MAC refrigerant for the future with the highest confidence
regarding safety, fuel efficiency, flexibility regarding future developments
30MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
(heat pumping units) and
system improvement potential!
Thank you for
your attention &
Questions are welcome!
SINTEF Energy Research
谢谢
31MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
SINTEF Energy Research� ARMIN HAFNER [email protected]
� PETTER NEKSÅ [email protected]
Acknowledgement:
Thanks for the contribution from Obrist Engineering, Shecco,
www.R744.com, BEHR and Visteon Deutschland GmbH.
32MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
33MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008
34MAC-Summit-Shanghai-2008