Upload
letram
View
224
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
global deviation analysiscompany abcprepared by:
peer-review by:
4 APrIL 2014
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
ContentsPage
1. Introduction 1
1.1. About Mercer
1.2. About the Report
1.3. Aggregate Compensation Values
1.4. Statistics
1.5. Confidentiality
2. Compensation Practice Overview 3
2.1. Practice Overview
2.2. Comparison of Practice to Market
3. Compensation Practice by Country 22
4. Global Market Comparison 29
4.1. Global Market Comparison - by Country
4.2. Global Market Comparison - Distribution Chart
5. General Comments 37
Contents
SAMPLE
April 2014 Introduction Global Deviation Analysis
1. Introduction
1.1. About Mercer
1.2. About the Report
- Austria - Belgium - Switzerland - Germany - Netherlands
- Denmark - Finland - Italy - Norway - Spain
Mercer is a global consulting leader in talent, health, retirement and investments. Mercer helps clients around the world advance the health, wealth and performance of their most vital asset – their people. Mercer's 20,000 employees are based in more than 40 countries. Mercer is a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE: MMC), a global team of professional services companies offering clients advice and solutions in the areas of risk, strategy and human capital.
This report contains an analysis on the Total Direct Compensation Package for Company ABC in multiple entities located in the following countries:
Market data used in the analyses is the regressed data by position class. Company data was submitted by Company ABC to the Total Remuneration Surveys in the countries covered by this analysis.
For each individual their compa-ratio was calculated as the percentage relation of a compensation element value to the market regressed median at the individual's PC. All aggregate analyses displayed in this report are based on these individual compa-ratios.
The compensation analysis is represented through the charts, containing comparison to the market and also the statistical measures indicating the company's internal equity. The analysis by country, by position class (PC), and by individual is performed. The results are displayed for the elements that compose the Total Direct Compensation Package.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
1
SAMPLE
April 2014 Introduction Global Deviation Analysis
1.3. Aggregate Compensation Values
Annual Base Salary
Total Cash Compensation (Actual)
Total Direct Compensation
1.4. Statistics
1st Quartile (Q1)
Average
Median
3rd Quartile (Q3)
1.5. Confidentiality
Includes Total Cash Compensation (Actual) plus the annualized value of any Long-term Incentive (LTI) awards, valued using Black-Scholes methodology for appreciation-based awards.
Includes Base Salary plus the annualized value of guaranteed allowances, cash benefits, any target Short-term Incentive (STI), Sales Incentive, Profit Sharing or Other Incentive awards paid out on performance over a period of 12 months or less. The figures reported reflect the actual amounts of the awards received over the last 12 months.
Includes only annualized base salary (Monthly Base Salary x Number of Months Paid).
The data point that is higher thant he first quartile of all other data in the sample when ranked from low to high. Also known as the 25th percentile.
The sum of all data reported divided by the number of observations in the sample. Also known as mean.
The data point that is higher than 50% of all other data in the sample when ranked from low to high. Also known as the 50th percentile.
The data point that is higher thant he third quartile of all other data in the sample when ranked from low to high. Also known as the 75th percentile.
The information and data contained in this report are for information purposes only and are not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional advice. In no event will Mercer be liable to you or to any third party for any decision made or action taken in reliance of the results obtained through the use of the information and/or data contained or provided herein.
Mercer is providing this information to its clients to help them make independent decisions regarding salaries and incentives. Because the exchange of salary and incentives information among competitors may be construed in certain circumstances as a means to facilitate an antitrust violation, Mercer has taken appropriate steps in collecting and disseminating this information in order to avoid such perceptions.
Human Resource professionals who deal regularly with data are aware of the variance that may exist in databases. Data may fluctuate slightly from year to year due to changes in the participant base. It is also important to note that within a sample, a significant amount of data may be reported by one organization. It is also possible for data to change drastically from year to year due to industry-related factors and economic conditions.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
2
SAMPLE
2. COMPENSATION PRACTICE OVERVIEW
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.1. Practice Overview
Countries where the standard deviation is below 20% are considered to be internally consistent. Countries with the standard deviation above this level are the ones with high internal differences in pay.
Compensation Practice Overview
In this subsection data is grouped by country. Each country is represented by its flag on the chart.
The positioning of the country on the chart is defined by two factors.
Countries where the average compa-ratio falls within the range of 80-120% are considered to be broadly aligned with the market. Countries that fall outside this range are considered as below or above the market.
The second factor is the internal equity measured by the standard deviation of individual compa-ratios within the country. The standard deviation is a measure of how widely values are dispersed from the average value (the mean). This figure says how much variation from the average compa-ratio exists within a country. This is displayed on the horizontal axis.
The first factor is the external competitiveness of the company's data measured by the average compa-ratio for the country. This is displayed on the vertical axis.
The proposed confidence levels are indicative, as for certain companies standard deviation above 20% may be considered consistent.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
3
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.1.1. Practice Overview - Annual Base Salary
Compensation Practice Overview
In the Market
Above the Market
Below the Market Consistent Inconsistent
Inconsistent
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Internal Equity
Consistent
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
4
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.1.2. Practice Overview - Total Cash Compensation (Actual)
In the Market
Above the Market
Below the Market Consistent Inconsistent
Inconsistent
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Internal Equity
Consistent
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
5
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.1.3. Practice Overview - Total Direct Compensation
In the Market
Above the Market
Below the Market Consistent Inconsistent
Inconsistent
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Internal Equity
Consistent
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
6
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.1.4. Comments to Practice Overview
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
Compensation Practice Overview
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
7
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.2. Comparison of Practice to Market
Compensation Practice Overview
In this subsection data is grouped by country and by position class. A flag on the chart represents all individuals from a given country at a given PC.
The positioning of the country in the chart is defined by two factors. One is a position class shown on the horizontal axis. The other one is the external competitiveness of the company's data measured by the average compa-ratio for individuals at the given position class in the country. This is displayed on the vertical axis.
Countries where the average compa-ratio falls within the range of 80-120% are considered to be broadly aligned with the market. Countries that fall outside this range are considered as below or above the market.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
8
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.2.1. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Annual Base Salary - PC 40-45
Compensation Practice Overview
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
40 41 42 43 44 45
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
9
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.1. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Annual Base Salary - PC 46-52
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
46 47 48 49 50 51 52
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
10
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.1. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Annual Base Salary - PC 53-57
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
53 54 55 56 57
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
11
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.1. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Annual Base Salary - PC 58-63
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
58 59 60 61 62 63
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
12
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.2.2. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Cash Compensation (Actual) - PC 40-45
Compensation Practice Overview
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
40 41 42 43 44 45
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
13
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.2. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Cash Compensation (Actual) - PC 46-52
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
46 47 48 49 50 51 52
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
14
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.2. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Cash Compensation (Actual) - PC 53-57
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
53 54 55 56 57
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
15
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.2. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Cash Compensation (Actual) - PC 58-63
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
58 59 60 61 62 63
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
16
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.2.3. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Direct Compensation - PC 40-45
Compensation Practice Overview
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
40 41 42 43 44 45
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
17
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.3. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Direct Compensation - PC 46-52
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
46 47 48 49 50 51 52
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
18
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.3. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Direct Compensation - PC 53-57
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
53 54 55 56 57
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
19
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Compensation Practice Overview
2.2.3. Comparison of Practice to Market per PC and Country - Total Direct Compensation - PC 58-63
Median
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Position Class
58 59 60 61 62 63
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
20
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
2.2.4. Comments to Comparison of Practice to Market
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
Compensation Practice Overview
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
21
SAMPLE
3. COMPENSATION PRACTICE BY COUNTRY
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
3.1. Compensation Practice by Country
Compensation Practice by Country
In this section data is grouped by country and by position class. Each cell in the table represents all individuals from a given country at a given PC.
The content of each cell describes the relation of average compensation at the position class to the market statistics.
Each compensation element is presented in a separate table.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
22
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
Q1 - Med.
< Q1
--
Austria Belgium Switzerland Germany Netherlands Denmark Finland Italy Norway Spain
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- Q1 - Med. -- --
-- -- -- +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3 -- -- < Q1 -- --
-- > Q3 -- Med. - Q3 -- -- -- > Q3 -- Med. - Q3
> Q3 -- > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 -- < Q1 Med. - Q3 < Q1
+/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. -- < Q1 > Q3 -- > Q3 Med. - Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
Q1 - Med. Med. - Q3 -- < Q1 Q1 - Med. -- < Q1 < Q1 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 -- -- -- Q1 - Med. > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3 --
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 -- < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 --
< Q1 -- > Q3 -- < Q1 -- > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. < Q1 > Q3 Med. - Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 Med. - Q3 > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- -- +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3 < Q1 -- +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 -- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- > Q3
57
53
52
51
PC
60
59
3.1.1. Salary Policy - Summary Results by PC – Annual Base Salary
61
> Q3
Med. - Q3
+/- 5% of Med.
above Q3 – salary policy is positioned towards the top end of the market
50
Compensation Practice by Country
between Q1 and Median - 5% – salary policy is positioned between 1st quartile and median
below Q1 – salary policy is positioned towards the low end of the market
No Market Data
between Median + 5% and Q3 – salary policy is positioned between the median and 3rd quartile
+/- 5% of Median – salary policy is positioned within 5% of the median
58
56
55
54
62
63
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
23
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
Q1 - Med.
< Q1
--
Austria Belgium Switzerland Germany Netherlands Denmark Finland Italy Norway SpainPC
3.1.1. Salary Policy - Summary Results by PC – Annual Base Salary
> Q3
Med. - Q3
+/- 5% of Med.
above Q3 – salary policy is positioned towards the top end of the market
Compensation Practice by Country
between Q1 and Median - 5% – salary policy is positioned between 1st quartile and median
below Q1 – salary policy is positioned towards the low end of the market
No Market Data
between Median + 5% and Q3 – salary policy is positioned between the median and 3rd quartile
+/- 5% of Median – salary policy is positioned within 5% of the median
-- > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med.
-- > Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3 -- > Q3 Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- > Q3 -- Med. - Q3 -- > Q3 < Q1 -- -- Med. - Q3
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- > Q3
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
41
40
49
48
47
45
46
44
43
42
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
24
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
Q1 - Med.
< Q1
--
Austria Belgium Switzerland Germany Netherlands Denmark Finland Italy Norway Spain
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- Q1 - Med. -- --
-- -- -- +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 -- -- < Q1 -- --
-- Med. - Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. -- -- -- > Q3 -- Med. - Q3
> Q3 -- > Q3 < Q1 Med. - Q3 > Q3 -- Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 --
Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 -- < Q1 > Q3 -- > Q3 Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 > Q3
Q1 - Med. > Q3 -- < Q1 Q1 - Med. -- -- < Q1 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 -- -- -- Q1 - Med. > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 --
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 -- < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 --
< Q1 -- > Q3 -- Q1 - Med. -- > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3 > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 Med. - Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3 > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3
-- -- +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. < Q1 -- Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 -- > Q3 -- Med. - Q3 -- > Q350
54
63
62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
53
52
51
PC
Compensation Practice by Country
> Q3 above Q3 – salary policy is positioned towards the top end of the market between Q1 and Median - 5% – salary policy is positioned between 1st quartile and median
Med. - Q3 between Median + 5% and Q3 – salary policy is positioned between the median and 3rd quartile
below Q1 – salary policy is positioned towards the low end of the market
+/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Median – salary policy is positioned within 5% of the median No Market Data
3.1.2. Salary Policy - Summary Results by PC – Total Cash Compensation (Actual)
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
25
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
Q1 - Med.
< Q1
--
Austria Belgium Switzerland Germany Netherlands Denmark Finland Italy Norway SpainPC
Compensation Practice by Country
> Q3 above Q3 – salary policy is positioned towards the top end of the market between Q1 and Median - 5% – salary policy is positioned between 1st quartile and median
Med. - Q3 between Median + 5% and Q3 – salary policy is positioned between the median and 3rd quartile
below Q1 – salary policy is positioned towards the low end of the market
+/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Median – salary policy is positioned within 5% of the median No Market Data
3.1.2. Salary Policy - Summary Results by PC – Total Cash Compensation (Actual)
-- > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 Med. - Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med.
-- > Q3 Q1 - Med. Med. - Q3 -- > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. -- > Q3 < Q1 -- -- Med. - Q3
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- > Q3
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
47
46
45
44
43
41
40
42
49
48
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
26
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
Q1 - Med.
< Q1
--
Austria Belgium Switzerland Germany Netherlands Denmark Finland Italy Norway Spain
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- Q1 - Med. -- --
-- -- -- Med. - Q3 > Q3 -- -- Q1 - Med. -- --
-- Med. - Q3 -- Med. - Q3 -- -- -- > Q3 -- > Q3
> Q3 -- Med. - Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3 > Q3 -- > Q3 Med. - Q3 --
Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 -- < Q1 > Q3 -- > Q3 Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 > Q3
Q1 - Med. > Q3 -- < Q1 Q1 - Med. -- -- < Q1 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 -- -- -- Q1 - Med. > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 --
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 -- < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 --
< Q1 -- > Q3 -- Q1 - Med. -- Med. - Q3 +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3 > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. < Q1 > Q3 > Q3 Med. - Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. Med. - Q3
-- -- Q1 - Med. +/- 5% of Med. < Q1 -- Med. - Q3 Med. - Q3 Q1 - Med. > Q3
< Q1 > Q3 < Q1 > Q3 -- > Q3 -- Med. - Q3 -- > Q350
54
63
62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
53
52
51
PC
Compensation Practice by Country
> Q3 above Q3 – salary policy is positioned towards the top end of the market between Q1 and Median - 5% – salary policy is positioned between 1st quartile and median
Med. - Q3 between Median + 5% and Q3 – salary policy is positioned between the median and 3rd quartile
below Q1 – salary policy is positioned towards the low end of the market
+/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Median – salary policy is positioned within 5% of the median No Market Data
3.1.3. Salary Policy - Summary Results by PC – Total Direct Compensation
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
27
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
Q1 - Med.
< Q1
--
Austria Belgium Switzerland Germany Netherlands Denmark Finland Italy Norway SpainPC
Compensation Practice by Country
> Q3 above Q3 – salary policy is positioned towards the top end of the market between Q1 and Median - 5% – salary policy is positioned between 1st quartile and median
Med. - Q3 between Median + 5% and Q3 – salary policy is positioned between the median and 3rd quartile
below Q1 – salary policy is positioned towards the low end of the market
+/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Median – salary policy is positioned within 5% of the median No Market Data
3.1.3. Salary Policy - Summary Results by PC – Total Direct Compensation
-- > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. > Q3 > Q3 > Q3 Med. - Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med.
-- > Q3 Q1 - Med. Med. - Q3 -- > Q3 > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- > Q3 +/- 5% of Med. > Q3
-- > Q3 -- +/- 5% of Med. -- > Q3 < Q1 -- -- Med. - Q3
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- > Q3
-- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- > Q3 -- -- -- > Q3
-- -- -- > Q3 -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
47
46
45
44
43
41
40
42
49
48
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
28
SAMPLE
4. GLOBAL MARKET COMPARISON
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
4.1. Global Market Comparison - by Country
Global Market Comparison
In this subsection there is individual data shown, grouped by country. Each point on the chart represents one incumbent.
The positioning of an incumbent on the chart is defined by the country shown on the horizontal axis and by the individual compa-ratio displayed on the vertical axis.
Numbers on the right-hand side of the chart show the distribution of individuals within the external competitiveness ranges.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
29
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
4.1.1. Global Market Comparison - Annual Base Salary
Global Market Comparison
~Q3
~Q1
Median
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
ults
11.9%
25.7%
51.8%
10.4%
0.3%
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
30
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Global Market Comparison
4.1.2. Global Market Comparison - Total Cash Compensation (Actual)
~Q3
~Q1
Median
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
ults
10.9%
22.1%
53.6%
12.7%
0.7%
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
31
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Global Market Comparison
4.1.3. Global Market Comparison - Total Direct Compensation
~Q3
~Q1
Median
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
Ext
erna
l Com
peti
tive
ness
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
ults
12.0%
21.8%
53.7%
12.1%
0.5%
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
32
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
4.2. Global Market Comparison - Distribution Chart
Global Market Comparison
The distribution chart contains the company's global data. The bars show the percentages of all compa-ratios at a specific value. The values of the compa-ratios are presented on the horizontal axis. The vertical axis shows a proportion of this value within the whole data sample.
The grey line shows the normal distribution of data as a reference for the company's data.
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
33
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
4.2.1. Global Market Comparison - Distribution Chart - Annual Base Salary
Global Market Comparison
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% 150% 160% 170% 180% 190% 200%
External Competitiveness
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
ults
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
34
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Global Market Comparison
4.2.2. Global Market Comparison - Distribution Chart - Total Cash Compensation (Actual)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% 150% 160% 170% 180% 190% 200%
External Competitiveness
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
ults
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
35
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis Global Market Comparison
4.2.3. Global Market Comparison - Distribution Chart - Total Direct Compensation
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% 150% 160% 170% 180% 190% 200%
External Competitiveness
Dis
trib
utio
n of
Res
ults
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
36
SAMPLE
5. GENERAL COMMENTS
SAMPLE
April 2014 Global Deviation Analysis
5.1. General Comments
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
- Sample comment
General Comments
© 2014 Mercer LLC April
37
SAMPLE
Copyright 2014 Mercer LLC. All rights reserved.
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hong Kong
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Venezuela
For further information, please contact your local Mercer office or visit our web site at:
www.Imercer.com