Upload
lorand
View
42
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Global and National Action on SDH Michael Marmot UCL. Secretary’s Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2010 Web-based Meeting 11 th Dec 2009. Lessons from International Efforts. Social justice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Global and National Action
on SDH
Michael MarmotUCL
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2010
Web-based Meeting11th Dec 2009
• Lessons from International Efforts
• Social justice• Empowerment as a
means – material, psychosocial, political
• Creating the conditions for people to take control of their lives
www.who.int/social_determinants
Conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age
Structural drivers of those conditions at global, national and local level
CSDH – three principles of action
Monitoring, Training, Research
Conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age
Structural drivers of those conditions at global, national and local level
CSDH – three Linked Areas for Action
Monitoring, Training, Research
Early child development and education
Healthy Places Fair Employment Social Protection
Universal Health Care
• Tools: Health impact assessment?
Early child development and education
Healthy Places Fair Employment Social Protection
Universal Health Care
Health Equity in all Policies
Fair Financing Good Global Governance
Market Responsibility
Gender Equity
Political empowerment – inclusion and voice
CSDH – Areas for Action
• Wider determinants
EXPENDITURE ON MEDICAL CARE PER CAPITA IN US AND UK
• UNITED STATES:
– US$ 6,096
• UNITED KINGDOM:
– US$ 2,560 (adjusted for purchasing power)
(Human Development Report 2007/2008)
HEALTH DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ENGLAND AND THE US55-64 year olds
0
5
10
15
20
25
England US England US England US
Low income Middle income High Income
Heart disease Diabetes CancerSource: Banks, Marmot, Oldfield and Smith; JAMA 2006
% Prevalence
• Not just the poor. A gradient
Life expectancy at age 25 by education,United States, 1988 - 1998
47.9
53.4
50.6
56.4
52.2
57.4
54.7
58.5
40
45
50
55
60
Men Women
Less than 121213-15More than 15L
E a
t ag
e 2
5 Years of school completed:
Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Commission to build a Healthier America, 2008
• The slope of the gradient is not fixed
Life expectancy at birth by socioeconomic deprivation US (male and female combined)
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1980-82
1989-91
1998-2000
(Singh & Siahpush, 2006)
Real earnings growth (%) for men and women working full time by decile, 1980 - 2005
OECD 2008
Real earnings growth (%) for men and women working full time by decile, 1980 - 2003
OECD 2008
Proportion relatively poor pre and post welfare state redistribution
05
1015202530354045
poverty rates post tax & transfers poverty reduction by income redistribution
71% 71% 72%
Source: Fritzell & Ritakallio 2004 using Luxembourg Income Study data, CSDH Nordic Network
62% 63% 59%
54%49%
44%50%
24%
Pov
erty
%
• Recognition by elected officials?
“…and we will learn from other countries along the way…”
Gordon Brown, Prime Minister, UK at Closing the Gap Conference, 6th Nov 2008
“I am pleased to announce that Sir Michael Marmot has agreed to undertake a new review of health inequalities in England…”
• “I have asked Professor Sir Michael Marmot, drawing on the excellent evidence of the WHO’s social determinants of health commission, to lead a review, based on the best global evidence on how we can do more to tackle health inequality in this country.”
Alan Johnson, Secretary of State, DH,6th Nov 2008Closing the Gap Conference, London
Building on health inequalities agenda in the UK
• 1998 - Acheson Inquiry into Inequalities in Health;• 1999 – national strategy for health in England –
Saving Lives: our healthier nation – commitment to tackling health inequalities
• 2002 – Treasury led cross cutting review on health inequalities
• 2003 – Tackling health inequalities - Programme for action
• Identify evidence to underpin future policy and action; • Show how evidence can be translated into practice;• Advise on possible objectives and measures, build on
experience of the current PSA target on infant mortality and life expectancy;
• Publish a report to contribute to development post-2010 health inequalities strategy. (Feb 2010)
• Indicators and the economic case
Life expectancy and disability free life expectancy at birth, persons by neighbourhood income level, England, 1999-2003
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Neighbourhood Income Deprivation - Population PercentileSource: ONS …………………………………………………………………………..
Age
Life expectancy
DFLE
Pension age in 2024
Poly. (DFLE)
Poly. (Lifeexpectancy)
• Whole of government
2) Enable all children, young people & adults
to maximise their capabilities & control their
lives.
Policy objectives
Effective evidence-based delivery systems.
Reduce health inequalities and improve health and well-being for all.
Policy Goals
Create an enabling society that maximises individual and
community potential.
Ensure social justice, healthand sustainability are at heart
of policies.
5) Create and develop
healthy and environmentally
sustainable places &
communities.
4) Ensure healthy
standard of living for all.
3) Create fair
employment & decent
work for all.
1) Give every
child the best start
in life.
Equality & health equity in all policies.
6) Strengthen the role and impact of ill-
health prevention.
Policy mechanisms
• Department for Transport
• Department for Children, Schools and Families
• Department of Work and Pensions
• Department of Energy and Climate Change
• Department of Communities and Local Government
• Ministry of Justice
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
• Department for Culture, Media and Sport
• Opposition parties
Working across government
• Understanding of the problem?
LIFE EXPECTANCY IN LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN: MEN
• Cycle from Hampstead in the north of Camden to UCL in the south. Travel from area where life expectancy for men is 81 years; within 30 min by bike life expectancy drops by eleven years to 70 years.
Areas in blue are known as “Spearhead Authorities”
Kensington & ChelseaQueens Gate ward:LE for men: 88 years.
Life expectancy at birth for selected London electoral wards, 2002-06
HaringeyTottenham Green LE for men: 71 years
(data from London Health Observatory)
• Local level?
Policy Mechanisms
• Equality & health equity in all policies– Health Impact Assessments– Equality legislation– Cross and all government approach
• Evidence based delivery systems– National and local levels
• Establish potential targets and indicators of outcome, output and process– Underpin the areas of action on social determinants in short, medium
and long term
• Provide a rigorous basis to facilitate performance improvement of national & local government and its agencies and hold them to account
• Provide the basis for: – setting national targets and indicators– assisting local agencies in their development of local targets on a
nationally comparable basis
Framework for indicators and targets
A fairer society
For further information
www.ucl.ac.uk/gheg/marmotreview
Final Report Launched and available online
11 February 2010