23
Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei Presented by W. F. McGrew, Juniata College Advisor: Dr. D. H. Youngblood Collaborators: J. T. Button and Dr. Y.-W. Lui Texas A&M University

Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Giant Monopole Resonances in

Unstable Nuclei Presented by W. F. McGrew, Juniata College Advisor: Dr. D. H. Youngblood Collaborators: J. T. Button and Dr. Y.-W. Lui Texas A&M University

Page 2: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Isoscalar Giant Monopole Resonance • Giant resonances – collective excitation of nucleus due to

near-exhaustion of Energy-Weighted Sum Rule

• ISGMR is a “breathing mode,” a rapid expansion and shrinking of the nucleus

http://cyclotron.tamu.edu/pics/structure_01.bmp

Page 3: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Compressibility of Nuclear Matter • The compressibility of nuclear matter can be calculated from

the energy of the giant monopole resonance

• 𝐾𝐴 = 𝐸2 ∗𝑚<𝑟2>

ħ2

• This constant is important for the nuclear equation of state

• 𝐾𝑁𝑀 = 231 ± 5 𝑀𝑒𝑉

• Speed of sound in nuclear matter ≅ 0.15 c

Page 4: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Typical Method

• Collide a beam of alpha particles with a target to excite it into ISGMR

• Measure energy and angular distribution of outgoing alpha particles

• The angular distribution tells us which are from the ISGMR, and the energy of those alpha’s gives the energy of the ISGMR

Page 5: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Unstable Nuclei

• The problem: a target can not be made of unstable nuclei

• The solution: switch the role of beam and target

• However, alpha particles are helium, which is a gas at room temperature

• Instead, the target will be made of 6Li, a solid

• Experiments with ISGMR using 6Li give similar results to those involving alpha particles

Page 6: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Experimental Setup

Image courtesy of J. T. Button

Page 7: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

My Role

• Determine the relative gain of the individual strips in the scintillator detector

• Account for attenuation in the scintillator strips

• Design a Faraday cup to catch the beam after exiting the MDM spectrometer but before entering the wire detector

• If the beam was not stopped, it would damage the detector

Page 8: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Scintillator Detector

• Used to determine energy and scattering angle of small decay particles like alphas and protons

• Consists of 13 vertical strips directly in front of 12 horizontal strips

• Five vertically-oriented blocks catch all particles that pass through the first two layers

• Examining the vertical and horizontal layers in coincidence map out 152 “pixels” which give the scattering angle

• The beam and residual decay particles pass through an opening in the center of the detector

Page 9: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

• Schematic diagram of detector

• Scattering angle indicated for each pixel

• Strip is attached to fiber-optic cable, which carries photons to photo-multiplier tubes

• One concern is attenuation

Page 10: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Test runs

• Test runs were performed using both protons scattering off of a 12C target and a beta source

• The beta tests were ultimately disregarded for analysis due to proximity to threshold

Page 11: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Analysis

• The data were analyzed on a pixel-by-pixel basis

• The elastic peak was isolated and its mean value was determined

Page 12: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Dealing with attenuation

• Examination of vertical strips seemed to indicate that attenuation could be explained as an exponential with an offset

• However, examination of horizontal strips proved that the situation was more complex

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Lum

ino

us

Inte

nsi

ty

h

Mean values of the elastic peak of v1

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Lum

ino

us

inte

nsi

ty

v

Mean values of the elastic peak of h2

Page 13: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Angular effects

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

1/co

h

Angular effects of apparent length for v1

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

1/co

v

Angular effects of apparent length for h2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Lum

ino

us

Inte

nsi

ty

h

Mean values of the elastic peak of v1

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Lum

ino

us

inte

nsi

ty

v

Mean values of the elastic peak of h2

Page 14: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Energy and scattering angle

• The kinetic energy of the particles is greater near the center (h9, in this instance)

• The particles deposit more energy at extreme angles

43.5

44

44.5

45

45.5

46

46.5

47

47.5

48

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Lum

ino

us

inte

nsi

ty

h

Mean values of the elastic peak of e2

Page 15: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Symmetric points

• By finding the ratio of points symmetric about the center, attenuation could be determined

• Attenuation has a linear relationship with distance over the area of interest

• Oddly, max attenuation varied between 7% and 30% among the various strips

y = -0.0136x + 1.0122

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

1.05

1.1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Rat

io b

etw

een

sym

met

ric

po

ints

Distance between symmetric points

h2 Attenuation Data

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Lum

ino

us

inte

nsi

ty

v

Mean values of the elastic peak of h2

Page 16: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Determining relative gain

• By comparing pixels with equal scattering angles, the relative gain could be calculated

Image courtesy of J. T. Button

v1 0.40

v2 0.70

v3 0.62

v4 0.65

v5 1.00

v6 0.94

v7 1.11

v8 1.18

v9 0.80

v10 0.63

v11 0.74

v12 0.48

h1 0.57

h2 0.69

h3 1.23

h4 0.94

h5 1.15

h6 2.01

h7 1.85

h8 1.00

h9 1.25

h10 1.05

Page 17: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Principles of a Faraday cup

• A beam of ions impinges upon a metal surface

• The charge hits the surface and flows to ground, resulting in a measurable current

Ions A

Page 18: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

My Design

• Designed using AutoCAD 2002

• Used SRIM (Stopping Range of Ions in Matter) program

• One thin layer of aluminum to stop the beam

• A much thicker layer of tantalum to stop alpha particles produced by the beam

Page 19: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Entire assembly

Page 20: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current
Page 21: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Additional specifications

• The mounting of the cup will be made of plastic to electrically isolate it

• Electrical connection will be made using a brush sliding over a PC-board

• The screw will be powered with a motor positioned outside of the box

• A position sensor will be used inside the box

Page 22: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

The Next Step

• The Faraday cup must be constructed

• The cyclotron must be conditioned for the higher energies that will be used in this experiment

• The experimental phase should begin next Fall, with a beam of stable 28Si, to assure that the experiment is providing the expected results

• Finally, the experiment can be performed on unstable nuclei

Page 23: Giant Monopole Resonances in Unstable Nuclei presentations/McGrew.pdf · v12 0.48 h1 0.57 h2 0.69 h3 1.23 h4 0.94 h5 1.15 h6 2.01 h7 1.85 h8 1.00 h9 1.25 h10 1.05 ... measurable current

Acknowledgements

Dr. Youngblood, my mentor, for sharing his years of experience and providing invaluable guidance

Jonathan Button and Dr. Lui, for their support and patience

Sherry Yennello, Lauren Heilborn, and Leslie Speikes for coordinating the REU program

The National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy for providing the funds to make this experience possible

My fellow REU students for providing an excellent environment in and out of work