Upload
vanliem
View
230
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II
MODULE I CHAPTER 2MODULE – I CHAPTER – 2
Site investigation and soil explorationSite investigation and soil exploration
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SYLLABUS - Module I
2. Site investigation and soil exploration:
objectives - planning - reconnaissance - depth
and lateral extent of explorations -methods ofand lateral extent of explorations -methods of
subsurface exploration - test pits - Auger borings
- rotary drilling –Types of soil samples-split
spoon samplers- Standard penetration test-spoon samplers- Standard penetration test-
hand cut samples- boring log - soil profile-
geophysical methods (in brief).
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode2
OBJECTIVES OF SOIL INVESTIGATION
● Determination of
– The nature of the deposits of soil
The depth and thickness of the various soil strata and– The depth and thickness of the various soil strata and
their extent in the horizontal direction
– The location of ground water and fluctuations in GWT
– Engineering properties of the soil and rock strata by
conducting laboratory tests
– In-situ properties of soil by performing field tests
● Obtaining soil and rock samples from the various strata
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode3
Geotechnical Investigation
Preliminary Investigations
Detailed Investigations
Reconnaissance
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode4
RECONNAISSANCE
● Inspection of the site and study of the topographical
f tfeatures
● Study of maps and other relevant records.y p
● Collect details about proposed constructions
C ll t l d i ti d t d th i f● Collect already existing data and then examine forsoils and geological conditions
● Collect details required for economic designs
● Helps in deciding future programme of site● Helps in deciding future programme of site
investigations, scope of work, methods of
exploration to be adopted, types of samples to be
taken and the laboratory testing and in-situ testing.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
taken and the laboratory testing and in situ testing.
5
Study of Maps● Study of maps from Survey of India or
Geological survey of India to get informationGeological survey of India to get informationregarding faults, folds, cracks, fissures, etc.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode6
Folds
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Faults
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Aerial photography
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Satellite imagesSatellite images
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS
● To determine the depth, thickness, extent anditi f h t t t th itcomposition of each stratum at the site.
● The depth of bed rock and the ground water● The depth of bed rock and the ground watertable is also determined.
● Generally in the form of test pits and few borings
● Tests are conducted with cone penetrometers● Tests are conducted with cone penetrometersand sounding rods to obtain information aboutthe strength and compressibility of soils.
Geoph sical methods are sed for locating the● Geophysical methods are used for locating theboundaries of different strata.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode11
Detailed Investigations
Direct Method
Indirect methods
Semi-direct methods
(Borings)Trial PitsTrenches
Geophysical methodsSeismic Method
Auger BoringShell and Auger BoringWash Boring
Electrical Resistivity Method
Soundings or penetration testsWash BoringPercussion DrillingRotary Drilling
Soundings or penetration testsStandard Penetration Test (SPT)Static Cone Penetration Test (SCPT)D i C P t ti T t (DCPT)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT)
12
DIRECT METHODDIRECT METHOD
TEST PITS
● Usually made for supplementing other methods or for
minor structures
● Visual inspection of soil
● Personal feeling of soils
● Collection of soil samplesCo ec o o so sa p es
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode13
SEMI DIRECT METHODSSEMI DIRECT METHODS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
AUGER BORING
● For soils with sides of the hole can remain unsupported
in dry statein dry state.
● Hand operated – 3 to 5 m depths
● Power driven – up to 50 m depth
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
HAND OPERATED AUGERS15
MACHINE OPERATED
AUGERS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SHELL AND AUGER BORING
● Shell used for soil with sides of
the hole cannot remainthe hole cannot remain
unsupported.
B i i l t t d fi t ith● Boring is always started first with
augering and the shell is used for
advancing the bore hole.
● Shell raised above the bottom of
the hole and allow it to fall freely.
The impact of the drop cuts thep p
soil and pushes the soil in to the
tube.tube.
● After filled, shell is withdrawn
and emptied
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
and emptied.
17
WASH BORING
● For soils which auger
boring is not suitableboring is not suitable
● For soils not mixed with
gravel and boulders
● For collecting samples● For collecting samples,
replace drill bit with
lsamplers
● Change of rate of
progress and change of
colour of wash watercolour of wash water
indicate change in soil
t t
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
strata18
PERCUSSION DRILLING
● Heavy drill bit suspended
from a drill rod or a cablefrom a drill rod or a cable
and is driven by repeated
blows
● Water is added to
facilitate the breaking of
stiff sol or rockstiff sol or rock
● Not suitable for loose
sand and is slow in
plastic claysp y
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode19
PERCUSSION DRILLINGDRILLING
TOOLS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode20
ROTARY DRILLING● Fast in rocks
● Drill bit fixed to the lower end● Drill bit fixed to the lower end
of a drill rod is rotated by
power
● Bentonite slurry is forcedy
under pressure through the
drill rod and it comes up alongdrill rod and it comes up along
the cutting soil
● Rock cores can be obtained by
using suitable diamond drillg
bits and core barrels
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode21
ROTARY DRILLING
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
DEPTH OF EXPLORATION
● Governed by the depth of the
influence zone which dependsinfluence zone which depends
on the type of structure,
intensity of loading shape andintensity of loading, shape and
disposition of the loaded area,
th il fil d th h i lthe soil profile and the physical
characteristics of the soil.
● The depth upto which the
stress increment due to
superimposed loads can
produce significant settlementp g
and shear stress is known as
the “Significant Depth”. PRESSURE BULB
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
g p PRESSURE BULB
23
GUIDELINES FOR DEPTH OF EXPLORATIONSl. No. TYPE OF FOUNDATION DEPTH OF EXPLORATION
(i) Isolated Spread Footing or Raft 1.5 B( ) g
(ii) Adjacent Footings with clear spacing < 2B 1.5 L
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ADJACENT ROWS OF FOOTINGSSl.No.
TYPE OF FOUNDATION DEPTH OF EXPLORATION
(iii) Adjacent Rows of Footings with clear spacing < 2B 4 5 B(iii) Adjacent Rows of Footings with clear spacing < 2B 4.5 B
Adjacent Rows of Footings with clear spacing > 2B, but < 4B 3 B
Adjacent Rows of Footings with clear spacing P 4B 1 5 BAdjacent Rows of Footings with clear spacing P 4B 1.5 B
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
PILE AND WELL FOUNDATIONSSl. No. TYPE OF FOUNDATION DEPTH OF EXPLORATION
(iv) Pile and Well Foundation 1.5 x Width of Structure from the bearing ( ) glevel (Toe of pile or bottom of well)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ROAD CUTS
Sl. No. TYPE OF FOUNDATION DEPTH OF EXPLORATION
(v) Road Cuts Bottom width of the cut (B)
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
FILLS
Sl. No. TYPE OF FOUNDATION
DEPTH OF EXPLORATIONFOUNDATION
(vi) Fills 2 m below GL or height of fill (H) whichever is greater
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SOWERS AND SOWERS (1970) FORMULA
● Empirical Relationship for Multistoreyed Buildings
( ) 7.0SCD =where
D = Depth of exploration
C = Constant
= 3 for Light steel buildings & Narrow concrete bldgs
6 for Hea Steel bldgs & Wide Concrete bldgs= 6 for Heavy Steel bldgs & Wide Concrete bldgs.
S = No. of storeys
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode29
Spacing of Borings
● The number and spacing of bore holes or trial pits willdepend upon the extent of the site and nature ofdepend upon the extent of the site and nature ofstructures coming on it.
● For a compact building site covering an area of about0.4 hectre, one bore hole or trial pit in each corner andone in the centre.
● For smaller buildings one bore hole or trial pit in the● For smaller buildings, one bore hole or trial pit in thecentre.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode30
Sl. No. Nature of project Spacing
1. Highways 300 to 600 m
2. Earth dams 30 to 60 m
3. Borrow pits 30 to 120 m3 o o p s 30 o 0
4 Multi-storey buildings 15 to 30 m4. Multi storey buildings 15 to 30 m
5 Single storey factories 30 to 90 m5. Single storey factories 30 to 90 m.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SAMPLES● DISTURBED SAMPLES
– REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES• GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS• ATTERBER LIMITS• SPECIFIC GRAVITY• CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
NON REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES– NON-REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES• Mixture of materials from various strata or some
mineral constituents lost● UNDISTURBED SAMPLES
• SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS• CONSOLIDATION PARAMETERS• IN-SITU DENSITY AND WATER CONTENT• COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY
BLOCK OR CHUNK SAMPLES
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
● BLOCK OR CHUNK SAMPLES32
SAMPLERS
● Based on Mode of operation
–Open Drive Samplers
• Thick wall type – Split Spoon Sampler (SPT
S l )Sampler)
• Thin wall type – Shelby Tube Sampler (UDSyp y p (
Sampler)
–Stationary Piston Sampler
–Rotary Sampler
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode33
SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode34
THIN WALLED SAMPLER
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SEALING METHODS
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
PISTON SAMPLER
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
OSTERBERG PISTON SAMPLER
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
ROTARY SAMPLER
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode39
BLOCK OR CHUNK SAMPLES
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
SAMPLER PARAMETERS
● Inside Clearance (CI)
– Should be between 1 to 3 %
All f l ti i f– Allows for elastic expansion of
the soil as it enters the tube,
reduces frictional drag on thereduces frictional drag on the
sample from the wall of the tube.
● Outside Clearance (Co)
– The outside clearance should not
be much greater than the inside
clearance.
– This facilitates the withdrawal of
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
the sampler from the ground.41
SAMPLER PARAMETERS
● Area Ratio (Ar)
− Should be kept as low as possible.
− ≤ 20% for stiff formations and ≤10% for soft sensitive clays.
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode42
University Questions
● Comment on the area ratios of the following samples:
Outer Dia (mm) Inner Dia (mm)Outer Dia (mm) Inner Dia (mm)
(i) Split spoon sampler 50 25
(ii) Drive tube 100 90
(iii) Shelby tube 50 47
Solution :
Outer Dia
(mm)
Inner Dia
(mm)
Area Ratio
(mm) (mm)
(i) Split spoon sampler 50 25 300 %
(ii) Drive tube 100 90 23.46 %
(iii) Sh lb t b 50 47 13 17 %
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
(iii) Shelby tube 50 47 13.17 %
43
Rock Coring Parameters
LengthR nCoreTotal
recovered core theofLength Recovery Core =
LengthRun CoreTotal
Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode44