GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS STORMY LAKE AREA · dian Nickel Company drilled two holes, one abandoned in overburden, within the boundary of the Walmsley Lake property. See the list of reference

S2F08NW0031 2.4608 KAWASHEGAMUK LAKE010

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

STORMY LAKE AREA

PROJECT 3354

MTS 52 F/7, F/8, F/9, F/10

1981

51983

February, 1982 Toronto, Canada

N.W. Rayner J.L. Wright

0i0cTABLE OF

Page

INTRODUCTION ................. 1

PROPERTY, DESCRIPTION and I/DCATION ...... 1

ACCESS .................... 2

HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK ........... 2

STORMY LAKE AREA - SUMMARY OF PROPERTIES - 1981 2

WORK DONE BY SULPETRO MINERALS ........ 3

GENERAL GEOLOGY ............... 3

SURVEY PROCEDURES .............. 4Magnetometer SurveyHorizontal Loop Electromagnetic (H.L.E.M.)

Survey

f^ INTERPRETATION ................ 10Jackson's Bay Kaw Lake Ray Lake Long Lake Kiwa Lake Gaw Lake Katisha Lake Seggemak Lake Walmsley Lake

CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS ....... 17

REFERENCES .................. 19

APPENDIX A - Specifications for Barringer GM-122 Magnetometer Specifications for Scintrex MBS-2 Base Station

APPENDIX B - Specifications for Apex Parametric s Max-Min II

APPENDIX C - Declaration of Surveys

MAP POCKET - Location Map Claim MapMagnetometer Survey H.L.E.M. Survey

INTROXJCTICN

This report describes geophysical surveys carried out

in the Stormy Lake area in Northwestern Ontario. Ground horizontal

loop electromagnetic and ground magnetic surveys were conducted on

eighty-one (81) claims to delineate airborne E.M. and magnetic

anomalies.

This work was done by Sulpetro Minerals Limited geo physical staff.

PROPERTY, DESCRIPTION and LOCATION

The initial claim staking in the Stormy Lake area was

in response to a Questor AEM Survey flown for Sulpetro Minerals over

a part of the area. Shortly thereafter additional claims were staked

as a result of the 1981 AEM release by the Ministry of Natural Resources.

During the spring and summer of 1981 additional claims were optioned from

R. Fair service and two (2) claim blocks resulting from regional geological

mapping.

The Walmsley Lake Property (27 claims) and the adjoin

ing Pairservice Option (25 claims) are located approximately 58 kilo

meters south of Dryden astride the Manitou - Port Frances Highway.

The properties called Seggemak Lake (10 claims) , Katisna

Lake (1 claim), Kiwa Lake (1 claim), Gaw Lake (2 claims), Ray Lake

(4 claims) , Kaw Lake (4 claims), Jackson's Bay (4 claims) , and Long

Lake (4 claims), are located in the Stormy Lake area, 44 kilometers

southeast of Dryden.

The summary of properties on the following pages gives

a complete list of property names, claim numbers and township or area.

Also the location map in the pocket of this report shows the location

of geophysical grids relative to Highway 17.

ACCESS

The Vfalmsley Lake property is accessible from Dryden

along the Manitou - Port Frances Highway 812, a distance of 58 kilo

meters.

Seggemak Lake, Kiwa Lake, Katisha Lake and Gaw Lake

claims are accessible via the Great Lakes Paper road which branches

south off of Highway 17, 35 kilometers east of Dryden.

The Jackson's Bay, Kaw Lake, Long Lake and Ray Lake

claims are accessible via the Sand Point Camp road which branches

south off of Highway 17 at Borups Corners. The Sand Point Camp road

follows the east shore of Kawashegamuck Lake. See the location map

in the pocket for road and lake access to the properties.

HISTQRy OF PREVIOUS WORK

To the best of this author's knowledge only the Walmsley

Lake property has received any mineral exploration. In 1970 the Cana

dian Nickel Company drilled two holes, one abandoned in overburden,

within the boundary of the Walmsley Lake property. See the list of

reference maps at the back of this report for more detail on previous

work within the Stormy Lake Area. All data contained on the above-

mentioned maps are contained in the assessment files in the Resident

Geologist's office in Kenora.

STORMY LAKE AREA - SUMMARY OF PROPERTIES - 1981

Gaw Lake - 2 claims - Kawashegamuck Lake Area

Claim numbers: 566712 - 566713 (incl.)

Jackson's Bay - 4 claims - Kawashegamuck Lake Area

Claim numbers: 563539 - 563542 Cincl.)

Katisha Lake - 1 claim - Kawashegamuck Lake Area

Claim number: 563548

Kaw Lake - 4 claims Kawashegamuck Lake Area

Claim numbers: 600791 - 600794 (incl.)

/J

Jf . . . « «

Kiwa Lake - 1 claim - Kawashegamuck Lake_J\rej|_

Claim number: 600785

Long Lake - 4 claims - Revell Lake Area

Claim numbers: 600781 - 600784 (inc.)

Ray Lake - 4 claims - Kawashegamuck Lake Area

Claim numbers: 600795 - 600798

Seggemak Lake - 9 claims - Kawashegamuck Lake Area

Claim numbers: 563549 - 563551 (incl,)570628 - 570630 (incl.)570638 - 570640 (incl.)

Walmsley Lake - 52 claims - Boyer Lake Area

Claim numbers: 566714 - 566718 (incl.) 589056 - 589060 (incl.) 589066 - 589070 (incl.) 589086 - 589090 (incl.) 594002600786 - 600790 (incl.) 541901561365 - 561369 (incl.) 487269 - 487287 (incl.) 600799

WORK DONE BY SULPETRO MINERALS

The following is a list of work done by Sulpetro Minerals on claims in the Stormy Lake Area.

1980 - Compilation of geological data 1980 - Reconnaissance geological mapping1980 - A.E.M. Survey by Questor Surveys

1981 - Geological mapping

1981 - Claim staking and linecutting (winter)1981 - Geophysical surveys - H.L.E.M., MAG, VLF

GENERAL GEOLOGY

Sulpetro Minerals holds claim groups from Kawashegamuck

Lake in the east to Upper Manitou Lake in the west. The metavolcanic and metasediinentary rocks which underlie this area belong to the Manitou Lakes-Stormy Lake greenstone belt. This area is characterized by a

thick volcanic sequence consisting of mafic to felsic flows and pyro-

clastic rocks and minor volcaniclastic rocks, and a sedimentary se

quence. Both sequences are intruded by mafic to felsic rocks of

batholithic, stock-like and sill-like form.

Gold has been the only economic mineral exploited

within the region to date. However, Cu, Ni minerals are present in

and associated with mafic sill-like intrusions, and minor Cu, Zn minerals have been found in felsic volcanic rocks but not in any economic quantities.

SURVEY PROCEDURES

Magnetometer

Logistical details keyed to each of the twelve (12)

grids follow. These include instrumentation, base station value,

and location, line and station spacing, personnel and survey dates.

Jacksc-h*s Bay

Instrumentation:

Base Station Location:

Base Station Value:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Barringer GM-122 Magnetometer Scintrex MBS-2 Base Station

Snake Bay Camp Longitude: 92027'40"W Latitude: 49 25'15nN

60800 gammas

100m

25m

T.Tobiason

January 30-31, 1982

Kaw LakeZnstrumentat ion: Barringer GM-122 Magnetometer

Scintrex MBS-2 Base Station

Base Station Location: Cedar Motel, Wabigoon, Ontario

Base Station Value:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

60000 gaititias

100m

25m

J.Smith /'T.Tobiason

July 22, 1981 //February 1, 1982

«v

Ray Lake

Long lake

Kiwa Lake

GaW Lake

Instrumentation:


Base Station Value:

Line Spacing: Station Spacing: Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Instrumentation:

Base Station Location: Base Station Value:

Line Spacing: Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Instrumentation:

Base Station Location: Base Station Value: Line Spacing:

Station Spacing: Personnel: Survey Dates:

instrumentation:


Base Station Value:Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:Survey Dates:


Cedar Motel, Wabigcon, Ontario

60000 garmas

100m25m

T.TobiasonJuly 23-24, 1981 / February 2-3, 1982


Cedar Motel, Wabigoon, Ontario

60000 gammas

100m

25m

T.Tobiason

July 25, 1981 / February 3, 1982

Barringer GM-122 Magnetometer

LO, 1+26N

59980 ganmas

100m

25m

T.Tobiason

January 27, 1982


L5E, O.B.L.

60002 garntas

100m

25m

T.TobiasonJanuary 28, 1982

Katisha Lake

Instrumentation:


Base Station Value:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Seggemak Lake

Instrumentation:


Base Station Value:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Walrfisley LakeInstrumentation:


Base Station Value:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:


LO, O.B.L.

60065 gammas

100m

25m

T.Tobiason

January 27, 1982


Snake Bay Camp Longitude: 92 27'40"W Latitude: 49 25'15"N

60800 gammas

100m

25m

T.Tobiason

February 4-5, 1982


LO+75E, 6+75S

60080 gammas

100m

25m

P.Qiurcher/B.Drost/I.Lowe-i'^ylde // A.Soever

March 30-31, 1982 //January 21-24 andFebruary 9-11, 1982

Diurnal control on all grids, except Kiwa Lake, Gaw Lake,

and Katisha Lake, was provided by a Scintrex MBS-2 continuously recording

base station. Readings of the earth's total magnetic field were recorded

each minute to a resolution of -5 gammas. Output is via a paper strip

chart from which additive contents can be scaled and applied to the

raw field data to produce the diurnal correction. The Kiwa Lake, Gaw

Lake and Katisha Lake grids were diurnally corrected using a standard

looping procedure. Check-in interval was generally from 30 minutes to

an hour following establishment of a controlled baseline. All diurnal

t»11

If • 9 • • •

corrections were distributed linearly along the reading interval.

These diurnally corrected data were then plotted Tjpon grid maps at

a scale of 1:5000 for all grids. However, before plotting a datum was subtracted to better present the data. This varies from grid

to grid but is generally in the 60000 gatnna range. Values for each

particular grid can be found upon the prints at the rear of the re port. After plotting, the data were contoured with intervals adjusted

to best present the data. Again, particular intervals can be found

upon the individual prints.

The parameter read was the amplitude of the total

magnetic field. This resulting from the fact that the Barringer GM-122

magnetometers are proton precession devices. Details concerning in strument specifications can be found in Appendix A.

Horizontal Loop Electromagnetic CH.L.E.M.) Survey

Logistical details keyed to each of the twelve 0.2)

grids follow. These include instrumentation, frequencies, coil separa tion, line and station spacing, personnel, and survey dates.

Jackson's BayInstrumentation: Apex Parametrics Max-Min II

Frequency: 1777 Hz Coil Separation: 100m

100m

25m

J.L. Weight / A,Soever

January 30-31, 1982

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel: Survey Dates:

KawiakeInstrumentation:

Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Apex Parametrics Max-Min II

1777 Hz

IQOra

100m

25m

D.Ward/T.Tobiason // J*L.T<ft:ight, A.Soever

July 22, 1981 //February 1, 1982

..... /8

Ray Lake

long Lake

KLwa Lake

Instrumentation:

Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing:Station Spacing:

Personnel:Survey Dates:

Instrumentation:

Frequency:

Coil Separation:Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:Personnel:

Survey Dates:

Instrumentation:

Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:


1777 Hz

100m

100m25m

D.Ward/T.Tobiason //J.L.Wright/A.SoeverJuly 23-25, 1981 //February 2, 1982


1777 Hz100m100m25m

D.Ward/J.Smith // J.L.Wright/A.SoeverJuly 26-27, 1981 //February 3, 1982


3555 Hz

100m

100m25m

A. Soever,/J.L.Wright

January 27, 1982

Ga.vr lakeInstrumentation: Apex Parametrics Max-Min II

Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing: Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

3555 Hz

IQOm

100m25m

J. L, Wright/A,SoeverJanuary 28, 1982

-V »

Kitisha lake

Instrumentation: Apex Parametrics Max-Min II

Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

3555 Hz

100m

100m

25m

A.Soever/J.L. Weight

January 27, 1982

Seggemak Lake


3555 Hz

100m

100m

Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel:

Survey Dates:

25m

J.L.Wright/A..Soever

February 4-5, 1982

Tflalmsley Take


Frequency:

Coil Separation:

Line Spacing:

Station Spacing:

Personnel;

Survey Dates:

444 Hz & 1777 Hz

lOQm

100m

25m

L. Stoliker/f. Churcher/T. Grantis/T. Hamilton/ A.Drosyi.Lowe-^lde/J.Newell/I.Macdonald // J.L.Wright/T.TobiasonMarch 29-31, 1981 // January 21-24, 1982 &

February 9-14, 1982

Parameters read were in-phase and out-of-phase percent

ages of the secondary electromagnetic field expressed relative to the

primary field. These values were then plotted in profile form upon

grid maps at a scale of 1:5000 and profile scale of 1 on = 20%. Details

concerning any plot conventions can be found upon prints of these maps

at the rear of the report. In addition, particulars regarding equipment

specifications can be found in Appendix B.

Frequency selection was dictated by the conductivities

to be encountered as well as ruggedness of terrain and conductor dis

crimination desired.

•. t T ,/lQ

10/.....

INTERPRETATION

Each grid is reviewed separately in the following. Both

the magnetic and H.L.E.M. results are analyzed together. An overall

summary is set forth under the "CONCLUSIONS" section.

Jackson* s Bay

Magnetic background in the vicinity of the grid is

approximately 59900 gammas with a total relief over the grid of roughly

200 gammas. This is almost totally representative of one reading at

L9W, SOS. The remainder of the grid has a relief of a very modest

50 gammas. No regional is observed in the data. Water cover has no

doubt dampened the anomalism over the grid. Texturally the area is

fairly devoid of any anomalism. Two isolated highs are noted at

L9W, SOS and L7W, O.B.L.

No bedrock conductors are noted on the grid. Out-of-

phase roll suggests conductive lake bottom sediments to be present.

This is particularly apparent at L5W and L6W, O.B.L. It is felt this

is the cause of the airborne anomalism.

Kaw Lake

Background over the grid ranges about 60000 gammas with

a total relief of approximately 700 gammas. No regional trend is ob

served. Texturally the plot reveals only one magnetic feature of note.

This is a linear bearing 307 from LO, 15W to L5S, 275E. Contouring

bias has broken the anomaly's continuity at several points. A dike-

like feature is suggested. Little else of interest is noted.

Only one H.L.E.M. conductor is identified. Following

are several parameters characterizing such. An alphanumeric identifier

is assigned to the conductor which is Kl.Conductivity-vri-dth

Anomaly Line Locations Strike Length Depth Dip Troduct - <r-t

Kl L4S, 165E 100m 35m Steep westerly 11 mhos

This is a single line anomaly of short strike length. The conductivity-width

product is probably a low estimate due to the limited strike length.

The conductor appears to immediately flank the magnetic linear to the

west.

IV.....

Ray Lake

Background over the grid falls near 60100 gammas with

a total relief of about 3000 gammas. No regional trend is noted.

Much high frequency isolated anomalism is noted on the grid. It pro

duces a quite 'bubbly1 appearing plot. A linear feature is suggested

to run from L2S, 235E to L6S, 450E bearing approximately 302 . Little

else of an analytic nature can be said.

Three conductors are noted and designated Rl, R2 and

R3. Tabulated below are several parameters characterizing each.

Strike Conductivity-width Anomaly Tone locations length Depth Dip Product ^.-t

Rl L3S, 430E * 20Qm 45m Steep 6 mhos L4S, 500E (open

north & south)

(* Above values derived from L3S)

R2 L2S, 200E 20Qm 45m Steep 6 mhos L3S, 250E *

C* Above values derived from L3S)

R3 L8S, 110E 100m 5Qm Indeterminate 10 mhosCopen

southerly)

All three conductors are poorly defined by the existing coverage. It

is felt Rl is a bedrock conductor but of very poor conductivity/ perhaps

a shear zone. Magnetic correlation is loosely suggested. Conductor R2

may well be caused by conductive overburden. Little can be said of R3

except that it does appear to be bedrock sourced.

Extreme topographic relief on portions of the grid made

H.L.E.M. coverage impossible. Of particular note is in the vicinity

of L6S, O.B.L.

Long lake

Background falls at approximately 60150 gammas with a

total relief over the grid of about 1200 gammas. No regional trend is

noted. Texturally the magnetic patterns are somewhat evenly distri

buted over the grid with no obvious linear or other geometric patterns

emerging.

• • • • + j -L<£

12/.....

One H.L.E.M. conductor is noted and designated Ll.

Tabulated below are several parameters characterizing such.

Strike Conductivity-^width Anomaly Line Locations Length Depth Dip Product <r-t

Ll L8N, 85W 30Qm 3Qm Vertical 30 mhosL7N, 65WL6N, 60W *

(* Above values derived from L6N)

This is a moderately good bedrock conductor. No outstanding magnetic

correlation exists save a loose suggestion of such on L6N.

Extreme topography near L3N and L2N, O.B.L. precluded

H.L.E.M. coverage in these areas.

Kiwa Lake

Magnetic background is approximately 59950 gammas with

a total relief of roughly 400 gammas being exhibited. No regional

tend is noted. The extremely limited area covered by the grid makes

it difficult to identify any textural features other than noting a low

developing northeast of L3E, 200N and higher values to the southwest

near L0f O.B.L.

No bedrock conductors are noted but substantial out-

of-phase roll indicates relatively conductive lake bottom sediments

in the area. It is felt these are the cause of the observed airborne

response.

Gaw Lake

Magnetic background is roughly 60050 gammas with a total relief over the grid of approximately 300 gammas. No regional

trend is noted. The very limited extent of coverage makes a textural

description impossible. Higher values are noted near L2E f 25ON and

L5E, 150S.

No bedrock conductors are found on the grid. Extreme

out-of-phase roll as well as some corresponding in-phase response

suggest relatively good conducting overburden is present. It is felt

this to be the cause of the observed airborne anomalism.

....A3

13/.....

Katisha Lake

Magnetic background is about 60015 gairmas with a total

relief of 800 ganmas. No regional trend is noted. The extremely limited

coverage precludes any attempt at a detailed interpretation except to

note a band of lower values extending from LIE, SON to L4E, SON and

elevated readings near LIE, O.B.L.

No bedrock conductors exist and not much out-of-phase

anomalism is noted. The overburden does not appear to be overly con

ductive.

Seggemak Lake

Magnetic background over the property is approximately

60150 gannias with a total relief of almost 4000 gammas. No regional

trend is noted. Texturally the data shows two fairly obvious linear

trends, the first extends from LO, 100N - to - L12E, 275S bearing

approximately 105 . The second runs from L6E, 100S - to - L10E, 125S.

Both are somewhat discontinuous along strike. Scattered over the grid

are isolated, short strike length responses undoubtedly reflecting

limited concentrations of magnetite and/or pyrrhotite.

No bedrock conductors are noted. Much out-of-phase

roll exists suggesting relatively conductive lake bottom sediments.

waimsley Lake

Magnetic background is roughly 60050 gammas with a total

relief over the grid of 1500 gammas. No regional trend is evident.

Texturally the magnetics reveal three major features. First is an

area of high frequency anomalism in the grid's extreme southwest por

tion, second is a broad linear feature extending from approximately

L21E, 250N - to - L29E, 625N, thirdly is the remainder of the grid

which has very little relief except the infrequent isolated 'pop 1 .

Undoubtedly the first feature is marking a lithologic contact between

different rock units. The contact would appear to bear roughly east-

west with, a right lateral offset of about 400m centered near L6N, 150E.

Bearing of this inferred fault would be north-south. The broad linear

feature would seem to be caused by a wide (i.e. 200-300m thick) dike-

like body. Perhaps a mafic dike or sill. Northerly to this feature

is a possible parallel response extending from L21E, 475N - to -

L25E, 600N. As well, another parallel feature could be interpreted to

14/.

extend from L32E, 150N - to - L35E, 275N. However, the available

coverage is not extensive enough to allow such an assumption.

No less than seventeen (17) H.L.E.M. conductors are

identified on the property. Designated W1-W17 tabulated below are

several parameters characterizing each. Rallowing each is a short

content.Conductivity-width

Strike Product Anomaly Line Locations length Depth Dip r—t

Wl L18E, 365N * 40Qm 18m Steep 23 mhosL19E, 440N (OpenL21E, 510N North-L22E, 650N easterly}

(* Above values derived from L18E)

This is a moderately good conductor which seems to be discontinuous on

L20E but a large esker at this location likely makes detection im

possible with the lOChi cable length,

W2 L24E, 390N 20Chi 45m Steep 66 mhos L25E, 515N * (Open

North easterly)


This is a relatively deep, but good conductor.

W3 L16E, 145N 50Qm 25m Steep 93 mhos LITE, 235N Southerly L18E, 235N * L19E, 255N L20E, 290N


This is an excellent conductor which, may have substantial width on

L19E or multiple sources.

W4 L7E, O.B.L. 40Cm 30m vertical to 35 mhos L8E, 15N Steep L9E, 35N * Southerly L10E, 105N

C* Above values derived from L9E)

A moderate conductor which swings northerly at the eastern extremes.

15/.....

Ctonductivity-widthStrike Product

Anomaly Line Locations "Length "Depth v Dip <r -t _____W5 L18E, 85N 300m Inde- Indeter- Indeterminate

L19E, 70N term- minateL20E, SON inateL21E, 35N *


The response is badly distorted due to a north flanking anomaly.

Current channelling is strongly suggested. It appears to take a southerly bend at the eastern end and not to be on strike with con

ductor W5. However, it is difficult to determine if two separate conductors exist or W5 and W6 are strike correlative.

W6 L22E, 135N 70Qm 30m Steep 75 irihos L23E, 175N (Cpen Southerly L24E, 175N Easterly) L25E, 165N L26E, 155N L27E, 160N L28E, 225N L29E, 200N *


Good conductor of extreme strike length,

W7 L30E, 85N 100m 3Qm Steep 23 mhos Poorly defined rolling anomaly. Shape and poorer conductivity could

suggest an overburden source.

W8 L35E, 75N * 200m 40m Steep 44 mhos L36E, 120N CCpen

EasterlylC* Above values derived from L35E)

ffoderate conductor of bedrock origin.

W9 L8E, 285S 600m 40m Steep 64 mhos L9E, 295S Southerly L10E, 290S L11E, 265S L12E, 25QS Ll3E f 225S U.4E, 150S *

C* Above values derived from L14E)

Poorly defined along much of its length. May well represent a flat

lying bedrock depression with the relatively .good conductivity-width product being a result of the wrong model being applied (i.e. dike- like model). Eastern extent swings northerly.

16/...*

CorKluctivity-widthStrike Product

Anomaly Line Locations Length Depth Dip ____o~-t____

W10 L21E, 255S 200m 35m Vertical 32 mhos L22E, 235S * L23E, 220S


Moderate conductor of limited strike extent.

Wll L25E, 370S 500m 30m Vertical 26 mhos L26E, 375S L2TE, 350S L28E, 350S L29E, 335S * L30E, 315S


Moderate conductor with generally poor responses. May be strike correla

tive with W12.

W12 L34E, 235S 100m 35m Vertical 44 mhos L35E, 155S * (Open

Easterly)


Moderate conductor open to the east. Definitely a bedrock source.

W13 L16E, 385S 200m 25m Steep 145 mhos LITE, 360S Southerly L18E, 290S *


Difficult to assess analytically due to close proximity to conductor

W14. Also may be strike correlative to conductor W10.

W14 L15E, 545S 200m 15m Steep 52 mhosL16E, 500S (OpenLITE, 515S * Westerly)

(* Above values derived from LITE)

As with conductor W13 this is difficult to assess analytically due to

overlapping effects. Internal lamination suggested by LITE data.

W15 L13N, 500E 500m 10m Vertical 29 mhos LL2N, 510E (Open L11N, 4T5E Northerly) LION, 450E L9N, 425E * L8N, 350E

(* Above values derived from L9N)

Well formed conductor of moderate conductivity, definitely bedrock

in origin.

...../IT

17/.....

Conductivity-width ' Strike Product

Anomaly Line Locations Length Depth Dip c- -t ________

W16 L8Nf 140E lOQtn 10m Indeterm- 41 mhosinate

Moderate conductor with the shape of profile suggesting a poor angle

of traverse. Could well be a folded or faulted portion of W15 and/or

WT7.

W17 L8N, SOW 800m ~5m Steep 102 rtihosL7N, 225W (Open NortherlyL6N, 325W Westerly)L5N, 435W *L4N, 535WL3N, 630W

(* Above values derived fron L5N)

A good conductor but poor angle of intersection (i.e. approx. 50 ) makes

the analytic interpretation somewhat suspect. Could be fault and/or fold related to conductors W15 and WL6.

Generally speaking the above reviewed conductors seem to follow two preferred orientations. These being 090 (east-west) and

045 . In the case of at least two conductors (i.e. W4 and W9) they change orientation between these two bearings along strike. Many of the re

sponses (i.e. W4, W15, and W17) are formational and may well be reflect

ing graphitic and/or pyritic horizons. None of the H.L.E.M. conductors

show convincing magnetic correlation. Conductivities suggest massive sulfides and/or graphitic material as sources for. the. majority of

anomalies. Geologic and geochemical input will aid greatly in evaluat ing these anomalies.

CONCLUSIONS and REXXayMENDATIONS

The following grids show little of interest and it is reconmended no further geophysical work be done at this time.

Jackson's Bay Kiwa Lake

Gaw Lake Kitisha Lake

Seggemak Lake

lo/.....

The remaining properties have legitimate conductors worthy of further

work. Outlined in the following are several suggestions as to the type

of further work.

1) Geophysical detailing to include; 5Qm H.L.E.M. , detailed magnetic coverage on 5m station interval, and detailed gravity profiling.

2) Detailed overburden profiles to yield overburden depths as well

as geochemical data.

3) Geologic and geochemical surveying of the grids.

If the above program is completed the data so generated

should greatly assist in a decision as to drill testing of these

anomalies.

N.W. Rayner Geologist

* i-J.L. WeightGeophysicist

19/.....

REFERENCES

MAPS

P-1187 - Boyer Lake Area, C.E.Blackburn - scale 1" = 1/4 mile, 1976.

P-2031 - Kawashegamuk Lake Area, S.Rivett - scale 1" = 1/4 mile, 1980.

P-2033 - Bending Lake Area, S.Rivett - scale 1" = 1/4 mile, 1980.

P-2034 - Wapageisi Lake Area, S.Rivett - scale 1" = 1/4 mile, 1980.

P-2437 - Boyer Lake, C.E.Blackburn - scale 1" = 1/2 mile, 1981.

REPORTS

Report 202 - Geology of Boyer Lake - Meggisi Lake Area, C.E.Blackburn, 1981.

APPENDIX

BARRINGER - MODEL G4-122

(ii) M&GNETCtoKrttR INSTRUMEMT DATR.

General Description, Principle Of Operation

If a proton rich fluid such as Kerosene, jet

fuel, heptane, etc. is placed into a magnetic field,

the protons will align along the magnetic field vector.

The magnetic field is induced in the sensor upon depress

ing the pushbutton. Then this field is suddenly removed.

Protons which behave as elementary gyroscopes will start

precessing around the remaining magnetic field that of

the earth. The precession frequency is directly propor

tional to the magnetic field of the earth. The magneto

meter counts this frequency, divides it by the appropriate

constant to obtain a reading in gammas and displays the

reading in the form of a 5 digit number.

SPECIFICATIONS

BAKRINGER - MODEL 01-122

RANGE

ACCURACY

SENSITIVITY

GRADIENT TOLERANCE

POWER

POWER CONSUMPTION

POLARIZING POWER

NUMBER OF READINGS W/l BATTERY SET

FREQUENCY OF READINGS

CONTROLS

OUTPUT

INDICATORS

20,000 to 99,999 in 12 ranges

-1 gamma through operating temperature range

1 gamma

600 gammas/ft.

12 "D" cells

<50 Joules (Wsec) per reading

0.8 A @ 13.5 V for 1.5 sec. (3 second cycle) 0.8 A @ 13.5 V for 3 sec. (6 second cycle)

2,000 - 10,000 depending on type of batteries

1 every 3 seconds 1 every 6 seconds

Pushbutton switchRange Selection switch - Slide switch for 3and 6 sec. located on P/C Board

5 digit incandescent filament readout

T.FD pointLock Indicator - last three digits of the dis play blanked off when phaselock not achieved Segment Function Indicator - all segments light up to permit visual inspection of the .display function

..../ £

MECHANICAL

USBTRtMEOT

SENSOR

AMBIENT CONDITIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL

Dimensions - 7" x 3.5" x 11" (18cm x 9cm x 28cm) Weight - 8 Ibs. (3.6 kg) including batteries

Omnidirectional noise cancelling toroidal sensing headDimensions - 4-7/8" (12cm) diameter

4-3/8" (11cm) heightWeight - 3 Ibs (1.4 kg)

Operating Ternperature Range - -40°F to 131°F (-40°C to 55°C)

Relative humidity - 0 to 100%

Instrument and sensor case made of high impact plastic

SCINTREX

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC BASE STATION

MODEL MBS-2

SPECIFICATIONS

RESOLUTION

TOTAL FIELD ACCURACY

OPERATING RANGE

GRADIENT TOLERANCE

SENSOR

SAMPLING RATE

CLOCK ACCURACY and STABILITY

VISUAL OUTPUTS

EXTERNAL OUTPUTS

1 gamma

-1 gamma over full operating range

20,000 to 100,000 gammas in 25 overlapping switch selectable steps

Up to 5000 gammas/inetre

Omnidirectional, shielded, noise-cancelling, dual coil

Internal control: switch selectable every 2, 4, 10, 30 seconds or 1, 2, 10 minutes.External control: manual command or by ex ternal clock at any rate longer than 2 seconds. For external trigger, a positive transition from 0 to +4V or greater initiates one reading.

-10 ppm over full temperature range

5 digit light emitting diode numerical display lasting 0.1 seconds in automatic recycle mode and 1.7 seconds in manual mode..Internal strip chart recorder with 65 mm chart width and 100 or 600 mm/hr chart speed. Ink- less recording. Switch selectable at 10, 100 or 1000 gammas full scale.

5 digit, 1-2-4-8 BCD DTL, TTL compatible (2 loads) with 0.5 msec, 5V pulse for syn chronization of MBS-2 and external recorder.Analogue recorder output of IV at 1 mA max. Switch selectable for 10, 100 or 1000 gammas full scale.

TIME MARKER

SENSOR CABLE

POWER

BAITERS TEST

OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE

DIMENSIONS

WEIGHTS

SHIPPING WEIGHT

OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES

A 1.5 second pulse every 10 minutes generates a time nark on the internal or on external analogue recorders.For an external analogue recorder, a switch to ground is provided (NPN tran sistor, 40V max., 250 mA max). No side pen is required for continuously writing recorders as the pen returns to zero at every event mark.Intervals of less than 10 minutes are optional.

50m length is standard

The internal batteries of the MP-2, (8 "D" cells) are used to power all func tions of the MBS-2. This power source lasts approximately 80 hours, at 25°C and a once per minute sampling interval.An external 10 to 32V DC supply may alter natively be used.Current drain is approximately 0.9A during polarize time and 35 mA during standby, depending upon supply voltage.

Digital readout of normalized internal battery voltage activated by touching switch.

Console: 0 to 50°C Sensor: -35 to 50°C

Console: 140 mm x 310 mm x 390 mmSensor: 80 mm diameter x 150 mm lengthTripod: 130 mm extended length

Console: 7.7 kgSensor with cable: 5.5,kg.Tripod: 1.5 kg.

Approximately 18 kg

Sensor monopod, harness, sensor backpack and 2 m sensor cable allow field portable survey use of MP-2 magnetometer. See MP-2 specification sheet.

e

MAXMIN EM II SYSTEM

The MAXMIN II is a two-nan continuously portable EM system. It is designed to measure both the vertical and horizontal in-phase (IP) and quadrature (QP) components of the anomalous field from electrically conductive zones.

The plane of the transmitter (Tx) is kept parallel to the mean slope between the transmitter and receiver (Rx) at all times. The MAXMIN II is a horizontal loop (HL) system when the re ceiver measure anomalous components perpendicular to the mean slope between the coils. It is a minimum coupled (Hin C) system when the receiver measure anomalous components parallel to the mean slope be tween the coils.

APEX MAXMEN II EM SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS

OPERATING FREQUENCIES 222, 444, 888, 1777 and 3555 Hz.

MODES OF OPERATION a) Transmitter coil plane and receiver coilplane horizontal (Max-coupled; Horizontal loop mode). Used with reference cable.

b) Transmitter coil plane horizontal and re ceiver coil plane vertical (Min-coupled mode). Used with reference cable.

c) Transmitter coil plane vertical and re ceiver coil plane horizontal, tilted for null in the receiver output. (Vertical loop mode). Used without reference cable, in parallel lines.

COIL SEPARATIONS 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250mm (MM II) or (Modes a and b) 100, 200, 300, 400, 600 and 800 ft. (MM II F).

Coil separations in Mode c) not restricted to fixed values.

PARAMETERS MEASURED a) In-Phase and Quadrature components of thesecondary field in modes a) and b).

b) Tilt-angle of the total field in mode c).

READOUTS

SCALE RANGES

READING REPEATABILITY

TRANSMITTER DIPQLE MOMENT

RECEIVER BATTERIES

TRANSMITTER BATTERIES

REFERENCE CABLE

INDICATOR LIGHTS

OPERATING TEMPERATURE

WEIGHT OF RECEIVER UNIT

WEIGHT OF TRANSMITTER UNIT

VOICE LINK

a) Automatic, direct readout on 90 inn (3%n ) edgewise meters in modes a) and b) nulling or compensation necessary.

b) Tilt-angle and null on 9Qmm (35s") edgewise meters in mode c).

In-phase: -2£% normal, -1£0% by switch Quadrature: -20% nomal, -10t)% by switch Tilt: -75% slopeNull: Null sensitivity adjustable by separa

tion switch.

-%% to -% normally, depending on conditions, frequency and coil separation used.

150 Atm2 @ 222 Hz, 150 Atm2 @ 444 Hz, 90 Atm2 @ 888 Hz, 40 Atm @ 1777 Hz and 30 Atm @ 3555 Hz.

9V transistor radio type, 4 batteries Life: approx. 35 hrs. continuous duty

(alkaline; .5Ah), less in coldweather.

a) 12V7.5Ah Gel-Cell rechargeable batteries (2 x 6V in series)

b) 18V2lAh alkaline lantern batteries(3 x 6V in series). Transmitter current drain 0.5A to 2.2A depending on operating frequency.

Lightweight, special teflon cable for minimum friction. Unshielded. All reference cables option at extra cost. Please specify.Built-in intercom system for voice communica tion between receive and transmitter operators.

Built-in signal and reference warning lights to indicate erroneous readings.

-40°C to +60°C (-40°F to +140°F)

6 kg (13 Ibs.)

Typically 65 kg (143 Ibs.), depending on quantities of reference cable and batteries included. Shipped in two shipping/field cases.

Built-in intercom system for voice cornnunica- tion between receiver and transmitter operators.

XIdN3ddY

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

Kiva Lake

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.

a'ACO

u, O

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)__

Geophysical - Magnetic '& H.L.E.H.

Kavashegamuck Lake Area'_______

Sulpetro Minerals Limited

Ste.301, 2161 Yonge St., Toronto, Ont.

Sulpetro Minerals LimitedSurvey Company _Author of Report N .W. Rayner & J.L. Wright

M4S 3Ab

As aboveAddress of Author.Covering Dates of s» y January 5 - February 15, 1982

1.9 Total Miles of line Cut.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

Magnetometer__

Radiometric__

Other_______

DAYS per claim

20

40

Geological.

GeochemicaL

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiomctric

DATE:,

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

K '(prefix)*

.?.22Z?.:L.(number)

I

TOTAL CLAIMS.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA Kiwa Lake

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey*"^^*^™*r ^ ^ ' •- -• .. " * »»*" • *>•'* -. •• ^ m *"v

^0*>^V - • • - *< . r ' ' ' ," ' .* '."*.. f "

"*. ' * Magnetic - 66 Number of St«^"- 66 (bpth surveyg)___________Number of Readings H.L.E.M. - 62

Station interval 25m :___________;_______Line spacing. 100mProfile scale. Magnetic - n/a H.L.E.M. - 1 cm = 20%Contour *-~«i ^g"6^ - 500 gammas H.L.E.M. - n/a

Instrument Barringer .tat-122 Magnetometer+-,

Accuracy — Scale constant_. , . .. , Ba.se Station Ti e»—V«c*V Diurnal correction method IXitM= 0*^11-1-011 ne uacK

Base Station check-in interval (hours)____^ hourBase Station location and value _______location - LO, 126N

Value - 59980 gammas

^^1

^CTROMAGNETICInstrument

Coil separation

Method: Freauencv

^pex jparametrics Max-Min IIHorizontal Loop100m-0.5%

D Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back C2 In line 3555 Hz

O Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. sUtion)

Parameters measured_____In-phase and out-of-phase components of the cyyr>ncTary________electromagnetic field

constant __ made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy-

Method D Time Domain - CD Frequency Domain

Parameters — On time ____________________________ Frequency _____ — Off time ____________________________ Range ________

time ___________________________— Integration time.

,, Power.m «array.

Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

;-^//"'V ( + ' /^

~* 1//* V-J ,1 • <- s

-vv! '/*; * ^ > ^ v "X"i" v /- .••"?- -;''•/"•'^,'-v^;' -.'/;-.->'.

• .,? .A -,^.,/--/./,/-' i//•"-•'/v » <>

/ ^ y f /'*

v'i/*' / -*-•a- ,-"/ r *•' / V•J- /'

'

\

INSTRUMENTATION' Apex Parametrics, Max-Min IFREQUENCY: 3555Hz.COIL SEPARATION 100m.STATION INTERVAL- 25mLINE SPACING 100m.PROFILE SCALE: Icm = 20%

0. P X--K--K- -»

PERSONNEL: A. Soever, J.L.Wnght SURVEY DATE • Jan. 27, 1982

H.L.E.M. SURVEY3SS5Hz .

•s

INSTRUMENTATION; Barringer GM-122,MagnetometerBASE STATION LOCATION: LO+00, I4-26N.BASE STATION VALUE- 59980VDATUM SUBTRACTED 59000*LINE SPACING^ 100m.STATION INTERVAL: 25m.CONTOUR INTERVAL: 50$rPERSONNEL: T. TobiasonSURVEY DATE: Jan. 27, 1982

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

I/./ —yofNatural Resources

Ontario(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemie.3! and Expenditures)

52F08NW0031 2.4688 KAWASHEGAMUK LAKE 900The Mining

Type of Survey(s) Township or Area

Prospector's Licence No.Claim Holder(s)

Address

8Survey Company Date of Survey (from & to)

Day | Mo. | Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total M iles of line Cut

Name'and Address of Author (of Geo- Technical reportJX'/'Ô./'

Credits Requested per Each Claim fn Columns at right___ Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey: t '

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

'"•-".- . ^ - ','"-.'' : ,'•• ••--. '•'.•••' '• '; - ;. Note: Special provisions

credits do not apply 4-?C. to Airborne Surveys.

.!;..'•*.- .-.•. i?,-ei"-r*^'-'.v-'^

Geophysical>r .'.-!«

- Electromagnetic*----"l f~ •--

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological•-•'-• '^ Geochemical '••••

Geophysical " ""

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other _;. ',, : . .- ,• , L-,-.,- .... .,

Geological — • ";— " •

•" :'''-'•••' •'•• JA !<;:-' i 'i-<v-.'.'..*' - Geochemicai /{.''•

Electromagnetic;

Magnetometer .-^•^•..îiis&t^-''."' •'.-• w> ^^tVV- .,,^«:.' H.f^f .^Y? -•Radiometric/ T,;^": ;h , •

Days per Claim

-20

..,.,„„,.Days per

Claim

-p-.-'T

.,,-„.„._..

Days per Claim

•"iK •••'a^;:i* .

Expenditures (excludes power stripping) <Type of Work Performed ;

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits ! *4i'j'JiK«âi:#'*ir::«»jjs..

^Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's ]\ ^choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected ^K'J j' in columns at right. •'.- " ;>'. v "'• - '.'-•./; •^• :-':~- >•'''•''' *;*

»NG LANDS SEC ri

w r ?KsiSSTBS*^teJ*s.Sr'£3^* ..~s.'i.--i'*i'^t33-. •;;•"•- ^*gâff % • -^ ° •£V.B«" •• - . BT- ' •'•• - .-^'-. »«^^...^^_^«.V* l?5- ;f?T, 'j%:,- .•i''*;«r'''2^S '!'. : Total number of mining ;<....».... s;* fSlS?'i-!-""Sls '»'v,S: '^¥^^;^;'--^J- ;5 T ifc '! "claims covered by this ,- ' /•.'>''•'il^^^F^;^!%^--;^|):J:?? ;®?fj ? ^report .tlf ôrk- r .f&" ' • *';:" T IT^Si: For Office Use Only^Wssrrtf ^^SBfl^^"^'^^

Certification Verifying Report of WorkI hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true."**4-1"-': , , •"• , v:/i: . :r V r;*:' ',: f4; if; ;

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying- .,>•:» «1fe'' ;

37Date Certified Certified by (Signatur

K':: :r Ii-yolNaturalResources

Ontario

at port of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act JL

— rltase type or piint. i,_: {.--'.--• '— I f number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: — Only days ciedits calculated in the

~, "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s) Township or Area *.« _^ • — • '"IT

Claim Holder(s)

/J.L.Prospector's Licence No.

A -Address

Survey Company

ame'and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) /I/. CjJ,J. .. ,::. . - . . - .,. • • S •

Date of Survey (from & to)/ , ^ , cf / 1 /5- ^ 8 *

Day 1 Mo. | Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

Na

Credits Requested per Each Clairfi in Columns at rightSpecial Provisionsv- f :^*'-'' : ~-A^&a-..*^- •

For first survey: : , ;

includes line cutting) *-.•• '••'-' •,••; >,™.,.-~~. .--«.,. ' • •-

For each additional survey:using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)~~^ ,~ ~~ ^

.• _ ; : \

Man Days > ; •

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

---

• ' " : " ',.. ; _ ^ j— - .... -~ ,-j . - ,,

i ' ' '

' IPÎS":*'" ,.'.•: »:pKi ;-:• .'>'•" J- • " ^ , .. * -, • -;.'•' : • . .?•• ' - .;.;.'• -... ./ ' - ...,'i ••"<•• -

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions

to Airborne Surveys.

.'-' • '.". ~V-'''?'' : ;t' : '-*ii ','' v

Geophysical -^^•^^jf^. '

' - Electromagnetic1 - 4"v. ^- * •' -

- Magnetometerys^^,-- ,^, —— «f, ««*.'. *».*^».J.. -

- Radiometric • '

,,.„. - O ther . v ^ -••'.

Geological :. /

--•"••^rt-- -. ^ •

' tGeophysical ?••—••-

:'' - Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

_ - Radiometric.. i-.,.

- Other'i rJ "" f '•-

'Gea9ic^9i#ffrJ"• '•''- '•' •' .:?' : '- "•".-. ';; ".'".^ ;._-"-'. :

Geochemical f'î''*" ! -

';.': i .i>;S^^;:>. y.^' :,:.v'

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric ^

Days per Claim

V-r: '

-V»'^^tv?r™ ] "

Days per Claim

':r^--r-

•i -':

~". ^"'"." "

Days perClaim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures ' ' ; ..Total

Days Credits

Instructions . ;,,... _•;,_Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's " choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected - •"•'•. < m columns at right. - _,/ • >• .-^'/i '.l^^.i^: -V M ^'--'..-- ••'! .^ "• V -V

Date Recorded Holder orÂgent (Signature)

Certification'Verifying Report of Work •/ I , »

claims covered by this report of work. *.,:./'

'A- x f'. For Office Use Only

I hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of thejjarts^set forth in the Report of Work ai or witnessed same during and/or after its completion arid thelfrmexed report is true. :^t; i ?' : -*;' . :

annexed hereto, having performed the work

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying ^^.i'iSSfijVifiS'SS'l^B^S

Date Certified ,/^-<r1-362 (81/9)

Certified by (Signaturet

Ministryof GeotechnicalNatural RenortResources "

Ontario Approval

Fit*

Mining Lands Comments

: Geophysics

Comments

ed ( | Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

| Approved Ql-Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

DTo: Geochemistry

Comments

[ | Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

I I To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462. '.Yhitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380»

;ji.

1982 OS 15 2.4*08

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources808 Kobertson StreetBox 5160Keaora, OntarioP9N 3X9

Dear Sirs

We nave received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electro magnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claim K 600785 in .the Area of Kawashegamuck Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a stat< of assessment work credits will be issued.

Tours very truly,

E.P. AndersenDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phones 416/965-1316

J. Skura/

ccs Sulpetre Minerals Ltd. Toronto, Ontario Attns Mr. N.W. Rayner

ccs H.L. KingToronto, Ontario

TABOR LAKE - M .E653

49°30'—

CsJ 00 IT) <M

I

LU

ocLU>-oCD

49°22'30"—I

> «> :;)IRAVlL_£ ^ g.. ,' mn • -^ ^> I 1. , Ol

Kawashegamuk-^

amanatogomo

80S69U8056? I L Q KB

Washtit>»mago Lakt

Stormy

Gawuwiagwa

(OtoCVJ

ILU

LU>LUo:

I—49°22'30"

28 2726' 28' 22 21' 20 19' IB 17 16'

92*15'

WAPAGEISI LAKE - M. 2056a 46»B KAWA8HEQAMUK LAKE £00

494922

AREA OF AJM

KAWASHEGAMUK LAKE

DISTRICT OF KENORA

KENORA MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH «4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

CSOLocL.O.

M.R.O.SRO.

NOTES "' ^'''«

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Roads indicated Oryden Paper Co Private Road may be used by prospectors only after permission is obtained from Dryden Paper Co. Dryden, Ont.

DATE OF ISSUE

MAR " i 133.7

TORONTO

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 52 FJL

PLAN NO.—

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

5T0IMYC L A /MS

a 46ea KAWASHEGAMUK LAKE

Documents

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS STORMY LAKE AREA · dian Nickel Company drilled two holes, one abandoned in overburden, within the boundary of the Walmsley Lake property. See the list of reference