Geophysical Survey Logistical Report 23

Quantec IP IncorpCMBted

Quantec IP Inc P.O Box 580,101 King Street Porcupine, ON PON1 CO Phone (705).235.2166 Fax (705).235.22S5

Geophysical Survey Logistical Report

23

fnTEDiHW/

,L. LANDSBRANCH.

Regarding the GRADIENT-REALSECTIONTDJP INDUCED POLARIZATIONSURVEYS over the MCGARRY-DASSERATPROJECT, Virgmiatowi, ON,on behalf ofHOMESTAKE CANADA J7VC,Timmins,ON

JM Legault August, 1996 P-158

32D04NE0157 2.17232 MCGARRY

Quantec

010

p-1 SB i linn mil nun mi inn linn mi mi inn inn mn mn mn mn mn mn linn HI mi HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.McGarry-Dasserat RSIP

32D04NE0157 2.17232 MCGARRY 01 OC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 . IIVITRODUCTION ..................................................~^

2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS................................................................................................................. 5

2.1 LOCATION.......................................................... . .................................................................5

2.2 ACCESS........................................... .......................................................................................6

2.3 PROJECT MINING CLAIMS: ........................................................................................................6

2.4 SURVEY GRID .........................................................................................................................6

3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN ............................................................................................................. 8

3.1 GENERALITIES........................................................................................................................^

3.2 PERSONNEL...........................................................................................................................^

3.3 SPECIFICATIONS...................................................................................................................... 8

3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE.................................................. ...............................................................9

3.5 INSTRUMENTATION.................................................................................................................^

3.6 PARAMETERS........................................................................................................................ 10

3.7 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY........................................................................ 11

3.8 DATA PRESENTATION..................................... .....................................................................11

APPENDIX A: Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX B: Production Log APPENDIX C: Instrument Specification APPENDIX D: List of Maps APPENDIX E: Maps and Sections

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES

Figure 1: Survey Location ...........................................................................................................5

Figure 2: Claim Location Map ..... ...............................................................................................7

FigureS: Gradient Array Layout .................................................................................................9

Table l: Reconnaissance Survey Coverage...............................................................;................ 9

Table II: Realsection Survey Coverage .....................................................................................10

Table III: Decay Curve Sampling.................................................. .............................................11

Quantec

P-1SB HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGany^Dasserat RSIP

1,

l

. QIP Project No:

* Project Name:

* General Location:

* Survey Period:

* Survey Type:

. Client:

* Client Address:

P158

McGarry-Dasserat Project

Kirkland Lake and Abitibi Temiskaming

June 11 th to June 21 .1996.

Time Domain Induced Polarization.

Homestake Canada Inc.

637 Algonquin Blvd East Suite 26, PO Box 1163 Timmins, ON P4N 7H9

Client Representative: George H. Wahl, Peter Wood

Objectives:

1. Exploration objectives: To locate and delineate potential gold mineralization associated with silicification and pyritization at target depths of 0-600m.

2. Geophysical objectives: To detect and delineate potential sulphideconcentrations by measurement of their IP and Resistivity physical properties. Furthermore, to map potentially significant geologic structure and lithology, by employing a joint interpretation of the IP and Resistivity physical data and to compare the IP results to previous drilling.

Report Type: Logistical

J

J

JQuantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGarry-Dasserat RSIP

ii

2, GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS

2.1 LOCATION

* Townships:

* Provinces:

* Country:

* Nearest Settlement:

* Mining Divisions:

* NTS Map Numbers:

McGarry Twp. ON and-Dasserat Twp. QC

straddles the Ontario/Quebec border

Canada

Virginiatown, Ontario

Larder Lake and Rouyn-Noranda

32 D/3, 32 D/4

McGarry Dasse Twp. Property

Fiaure 1: Survey Location

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.McGanyCasserat RSIP

2.2 ACCESS

* Base of Operations: Virginiatown, Ontario

* Mode of Access: From Virginiatown, by 4x4 truck east along highway66 then 1 kilometer north along secondary roads.

* Nearest Highway: Highway 66/117

2.3 PROJECT MINING CLAIMS1 :

1. McGarrv Two: 772736, 772735, 13008, 13009,667100, 667099, 13010, 28760, 644716,644715

2. Dasserat Two: 456358-1, 456361-1.56357-1.456357-3, 462846-1, 456343-2, 456361-5, 456361-3, 456361-4, 456357-2, 456343-1, 462846-5, 462846-4, 462846-3, 456342-4 (Fig 2)

2.4 SURVEY GRID

* Coordinate Reference System: Local cut and picket survey grids (non UTM)

* Line Direction: NOSO^ (Grid N-S)

* Line Separation: 100 meters

* Station Interval: 25 meters

1 From: McGarry Property DDH Location Map

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGany4)asserat RSIP

l-tl!

McGarry j Dasserat

Area of Diamond Drilling

i1 !? McGarry Property f! If DDH Location MapO i O ~

Fiaure 2: Claim Location Mao

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGarryÔasserat RSIP

3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN

3.1 GENERALITIES

* Survey Oates:

* Survey Period:

* Survey Days:

* Total km Surveyed:

3.2 PERSONNEL

* Supervisor:

* Project Manager:

* Field Assistants:

3.3 SPECIFICATIONS

* Array:

. AB:

1. Reconnaissance:

2. Detail follow-up:

. MN:

* Sampling Interval:

* Total km Surveyed:

* Total Gradient AB Blocks:

* Total Realsections:

June 11 to 21 s1 ,1996

11 days

7 days

15.5km

GR Jeff Warne, South Porcupine ON

Richard Chasse, Kirkland Lake, ON

Michel Furez, Kirkland Lake, ON Stephane Furez, Kirkland Lake, ON Gene Kallfa, South Porcupine, ON

Multiple Gradient (see figure 2)

3900 meters

1500 to 3100 meters

25 meters

25 meters

15.5 km (including reconnaisance, detailed and overlap coverage).

1

4

Approximate Arial Coverage: 1.3 km2

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGany-Dasserat RSIP

GRADIENT ARRAY

///////fY////

GRADIENT ARRAY COVERAGE AREA

Figure 3: Gradient Array Layout

3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE

* Reconnaissance:

* Overlap:

* Detailed l Realsection:

10050m (see Table l)

none

5450m (see Table II)

LINE10+OOE11+OOE12+OOE13+OOE14+OOE15+OOE16+OOE17+OOE18+OOE19+OOE20+OOE2H-OOE22+OOETOTAL

Min. Extent175S375S350S350S600S600S600S600S600S600S600S450S400S

Max. Extent150N150N250N250N250N150N150N150N150N150N150N900N900N

Length (m)3255256006008507507507507507507501350130010050

Table l: Reconnaissance Survey Coverage

Quantec

P-158 HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGary-Dasserat RSIP

LINE12+OOE13+OOE14+OOE19+OOETOTAL

M in. Extent350S350S450S600S

Max. ExtentONON

150N150S

No. AB Spacings4442

Total Length (m)130013001950900

5450

Table II: Realsection Survey Coverage

3.5 INSTRUMENTATION

* Receiver:

* Transmitter:

* Power Supply:

IRIS IP-6 (6 channel l Time Domain)

Phoenix IPT-2B (15 kWatt 1 100-3200V)

Onan 25 HP l Bendix 18 kVA (400Hz @ 120V) motor generator system.

3.6 PARAMETERS

* Input Waveform: Square wave @ 0.0625 hz, 5Q1b duty cycle.

* Receiver Sampling Parameters: QIP custom windows (see Table III)

* Measured Parameters:

1. Chargeability in mV7V across max. 10 time-gates, plus area under decay curve.

2. Primary Voltage in millivolts and Input Current in milli-amperes for Resistivity in Q-rn calculated according to Gradient Array geometry factor2.

Ref. BRGM ELREC-6 Operating Manual.

Quantec

P-158 HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGany-Dasserat RSIP

SliceTdT1

T2

T3

T4

TST6

T7

T8

TgT10

Total Tp

Duration (msec)6060

60

60

60

360

360

360

720

720

720

3540

Start (msec)060

120

180

240

300

660

1020

1380

2100

2820

End (msec)60120

180

240

300

660

1020

1380

2100

2820

3540

Mid-Point (msec)

80

150

210

270

480

840

1200

1740

2460

3180

Table III: Decay Curve Sampling

3.7 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY

. Chargeability:

* Resistivity:

3.8 DATA PRESENTATION

* Maps:

generally less than 0.5 mV/V but acceptable to 1.0mVA/.

less than S'&cummulative error from Primary voltage and Input current measurements.

Reconnaissance Coverage: Contoured plan maps of ABs3900m of Total Chargeability and Apparent Resistivity at a scale of 1=5000 (2 maps).

"Realsection" Detail follow-up: Contoured depth section maps of TotalChargeability and Apparent Resistivity at a scale of 1=2500, forL12-K)OE, 113+OOE, 14+OOE, 19+OOE (8 maps).

10

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGEvryÔasserat RSIP

* Digital:

Raw data:

Processed data:

using the following format:

IP-6 digital dump file (See also Appendix D).

ASCII Geosoft .XYZ format.

Column 1 = Line (X Position), in metresColumn 2 s Station (Y Position), in metresColumn 3 s Apparent Resistivity, in Q-mColumn 4 = Total Chargeability, in m V/VColumn ^ = TDIP Spectral Estimates, derived using IPREDC

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

G.R. Jeff Wame Senior Geophysicist

Jean M. Legault Chief Geophysicist

Christine Williston Processing Geophysicist

Porcupine, ON November, 1996.

11Quantec

P-1SB HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.McGany-Dasserat RSIP

APPENDIX Aa;:;; ^^l , : : : - -W^^^^MiMKiM: : îSWmiiS^^MK^M

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:

l, G.R. Jeffrey Wame, hereby declare that:

1. l am a geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l studied Engineering Geophysics in the Faculty of Applied Science at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, completing all but two of the course requirements for a B.Sc.(Eng.) in 1981.

3. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1981 in Canada, the United States and Chile.

4. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Homestake Canada Inc.

5. The statements made in this report represent my professional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.

Porcupine, Canada November, 1996

' WarneSenior Geophysicist General Manager - QIP

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.McGany-Dasserat RSIP

APPENDIX A;

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:

l, Jean M. Legault, declare that:

1. l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l obtained a Bachelor's Degree, with Honours, in Applied Science (BASc.), Geological Engineering (Geophysics Option), from Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, in Spring 1982.

3. l am a registered professional engineer (# 047032), with license to practice in the Province of Quebec, since 1985.

4. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1982, in North-America, South-America and North-Africa.

5. l am a member of the Society of Engineers of Quebec, the Quebec Prospectors Association, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

6. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Homestake Canada Inc.


Porcupine, Ontario November, 1996

Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (QC) Chief Geophysicist Dir. Technical Services Quantec Group

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.McGany-Dasserat RSIP

STATEMENT of QUALIFICATIONS:

l, Christine Williston, hereby declare that:

1. l am a processing geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec Consulting Inc. of Porcupine, Ontario.

2. l am a graduate of York University, North York, ON, in 1994, with an Honours Bachelor of Science Degree in Earth and Atmospheric Science.

3. l have practiced my profession in Canada since graduation.

4. l have no interest nor do l expect to receive any interest, direct or indirect, in the properties or securities of Homestake Canada Inc.

5. The maps created in this report accurately represent the information given to me at the time of the preparation of this report.

Porcupine, Ontario November, 1996

Christine Williston, B.Sc. Processing Geophysicist Quantec Technical Services

Quantec

P-153 HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGany-Dasserat RSIP

APPENDIX B

PRODUCTION LOG

DATE11-Jun12-Jun

13-Jun

14-Jun

1SJun

16-Jun

17-Jun

18-Jun

19-Jun

20-Jun

21-Jun

EXPLANATIONMob to V-Town, check out grid locationStart set up AB 4000 @L-14*ODE at2OOOS to2000NGo to Timmins to get gen/set, finish AB, test equip lightning storm PM.Change AB X3tend up with 3900 AB@ L14E 1900Nto2000SL-1 1 E39L-12E39L-13E39L-14E39L-15E39L-16E39L-17E39L-18E39L-19E39L-20E39L-21E39L-21 E39L-22E39move over to L-10EL-10E39L-9E39 -bad data. Hydro.traclcs run parallel for 150 south, call Jeff.Shrink AB size to 3100 @L14E 150ON to 1600Snot enough current, dig pits X5,George,Peter outL-14E31L-13E31L-12E31L-19E31Change Ab X3,dig pits X8 Ab 2500 @L-14E 1200N to1300S.L-19E25L-14E25L-13E25L-12E25Set up Ab2000e L-14E TOON to 1300S dig extra pitsL-12E20L-13E20L-14E20Set up Ab15CO @ L-14E TOON to 800SL-14E15L-13E15L-12E15Start winding up wire/pack upFinish winding wire/demob to TimminsTOTALS

LINE

1100E1200E1300E1400E15DOE1600E1700E1800E1900E2000E2100E2100E2200E

1000E900E

1400E1300E1200E1900E

1900E1400E1300E1200E

1200E1300E1400E

1400E1300E1200E

START

150N350S250N250Neoos150Neoos150NeoosISDN450S300N900N

150N

150N0

350S150S

eoos0

350S0

325S25S4505

0325S25S

END

375S250N350Seoos150Neoos150Neoos150Neoos300N900N400S

1755

450S350S

0eoos

150S450S

0390S

25S325S

0

45DS25S

325S

TOTAL

525600600850750750750750750750750

JBOO1300

325

600350350450

450450350350

300300450

450300300

15,500

Quantec

P-1SB HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGafry-Oasserat RSIP

APPENDIX C

INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS:

Iris IP-6 (6 channel) Receiver(from IRIS Instruments IP 6 Operating Manual)

Weather proof case

Dimensions: Weight:

Operating temperature:

Storage: Power supply:

Input channels:Input impedance:Input overvottage protection:Input voltage range:

SP compensation:

Noise rejection:

Primary voltage resolution: accuracy:

Secondary voltage windows:

Sampling rate: Synchronization accuracy: Chargeability resolution:

accuracy:

Battery test: Grounding resistance: Memory capacity: Data transfer:

31 cm x 21 cm x 21 cm6 kg with dry cells7.8 kg with rechargeable bat.-20"C to 708C(-40"C to 70"C with optional screen heater)(-40"C to 700C)6 x 1.5 V dry cells (100 hr. @ 200C) or2 x 6 V NiCad rechargeable (in series) (SOhrs @ 200C) or 1 x 12 Vexternal610 Mohmup to 1000 volts10V maximum on each dipole15V maximum sum over eh 2 to 6automatic 10 V with linear drift correctionup to 1 mV/s50 to 60 Hz poweriine rejection100 dB common mode rejection (for RszO)automatic stacking1 uV after stackingD.3% typically; maximum 1 over wholetemperature rangeup to 10 windows; 3 preset window specs.plus fully programmable sampling.10 ms10 ms, minimum 40 uV0.1 mV/Vtypically D.6%. maximum 2"X) of reading 1 mV/V forVÎOmVmanual and automatic before each measurement0.1 to467kohm2505 records, 1 dipole/recordserial link @ 300 to 19200 baud remote control capabilitythrough serial link @ 19200 baud

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGarry-Dasserat RSIP

APPENDIX C

INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS:

IP-2B Transmitter

Power Sources:

Output Voltage:

Output Power:

Maximum Current:

Ammeter Ranges:

Meter Display:

Current regulation:

Output waveform:

Output waveform IPT-2B option:

Operating Temperature:

Frequency Stability

Transient Protection:

Thermal Protection:

Dimensions:

Weight:

Shipping Weight:

Phoenix MG-19 (10KVA, 120V, 3 phase, 400Hz) motor generator (30KVA, 120V, 3 phase) motor generator Phoenix MG-1, 2 or 3 can also be used, but will generate ft the voltage

To 1400V in four ranges of resp. 250-375V, 420-630V, 650-975V, 935-1400V. Voltage is continuously variable 2ffik from each nominal step value.

Maximum continuous output power is 10KW. Absolute maximum output power is 15KW.

15Amps

30mA, 100mA, 1A, 3A, 10Aand SOAfull scale.

A meter function switch selects the display of current level, regulation status, input frequency, output voltage, control battery voltage or line voltage

The change in output current is less than D.2% for a lO'ft change ininput voltage or electrode impedance. Regulation is achieved by feedback tothe alternator of the motor generator unit

Either DC, single frequency, two frequencies simultaneously, or time domain (50*fc duty cycle). Frequencies of 0.078, 0.156, 0.313,1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 Hz are standard, whereas C.062, 0.125, 0.25,1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 Hz are optionally available. The simultaneous transmission mode has 0.313 and 5.0 Hz as standard, whereas 0.156 and 2.5 Hz are optional.

9 frequencies in binary progression: 1/16 -1/32 -1/16 -1/8 -1/4 -1/2 -1 2 and 4, with variable duty cycle. Selectable to one of four values: 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1. NOTE: Duty cycle = 1 is the operation equal to the standard frequency domain cycling, i.e. Full On, except for a SOm.sec. gap at each half cycle

-40"C to +6CPC

tl'Jfc from -40^ to *600C is standard. A precision time base is optionally available for coherent detection and phase IP measurements.

Current is turned off automatically if it exceeds 150*36 full scale or is less than S1* full scale.

Unit is fan-forced cooled. Thermostat turns transmitter off at 65CC and turns back on at 550C internal temperature.

46 x 46 x 32cm (18x18x13in)

45kg

56kg

Quantec

HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGarry-Dasserat RSIP

APPENDIX!)

LIST OF MAPS

Contoured Plan Maps: (Scale of 1:5000)

1. Total chargeability ^6=3900171) DWG# P-158-PLAN-CHG-2 Apparent resistivity ^6=390001) DWG# P-158-PLAN-RES-2

Contoured "Realsection" Map: (Scale of 1:2500)

1. Total Chargeability: Line 12+OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-CHG-1Apparent Resistivity: Line 12+OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-RES-1

2. Total Chargeability: LinelS+OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-CHG-2Apparent Resistivity: Line13-*-OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-RES-2

3. Total Chargeability: Line 14+OOE Map* P-158-RSIP-CHG-3Apparent Resistivity: Line 14+OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-RES-3

4. Total Chargeability: Line19*OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-CHG-4Apparent Resistivity: Line19*OOE Map#P-158-RSIP-RES-4

Quantec

P-15B HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. McGany-Dassefat RSIP

APPENDIX E

MAPS AND SECTIONS

Quantec

re.: McGarry-Dasserat Project Realsection IP\Resistivity Survey

date: June, 1996

for: Homestake Canada Inc. and joint-venture partner(s)

637 Algonquin Blvd. East Suite 26, P.O. Box 1163 Timmins ON P4N 7H9

by: Jean M Legault, P. Eng. (QC)

Director Technical ServicesQuantec Consulting Inc.

l 101 King Street, P.O. Box 580 i Porcupine, ON PON 1 CO

Tel: (705)2352166 i Fax: (705)2352255

' 4. SUMMARY INTERPRETATION......................................................................................................124.1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................12

j 4.2 SURVEY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION.......................................................................................12* 5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................15T APPENDIX F: Anomaly Table

J APPENDIX G: Survey Costs

Table l: Recommended DDH-Targets at McGarry-Dasserat..............................................................15

Interpretation Plan Map Map # P158-RSIP-INT-1

l

J

J

JQuantec

P158 HOMESTAKE CANADA INCAddendum to Logistics Report

4, SUMMARY INTERPRETATION

4.1 OVERVIEW

The Gradient -Realsection IPVResistivity surveys over the McGarry-Dasserat Property were de signed to help detect potential gold mineralization associated with disseminated sulphides from sur face to 600m depths. The target mineralization is the Deak-Kerr type, where ^"/o disseminated, Au-bearing pyrite occurs along the contact between a silicified wacke and a komatiite which hosts the Cadillac-Larder Lake Break - a well-known ENE-trending mineralizing structure regionally, within the Larder Lake gold camp. However, the key Archean-age volcano-sedimentary contact and Larder Lake Break (LLB) are completely overlain, through the central part of the survey area, by a thick (0- 300m) blanket of younger Huronian-age Cobalt Group sediments which lie in unconformable contact along the graben-like structure (P. Woods, HCA, pers. comm., 03/95). The Gradient-Realsection technique was chosen based on its high resolution and deep penetration capabilities

The McGarry-Dasserat property has been extensively explored by diamond drilling, particularly on the Ontario side (Trans-arctic Exploration Ltd., Geologic Compilation and DP Hole Plan, 07/93), where the Larder Lake-Timiskaming-Blake River stratigraphic succession is well-established. The property has recently been surveyed using ground total field magnetics (Rayan Exploration, McGarry-Dasserat Property TFM Survey. 06/96), which overlaps the present survey coverage. Two drill-holes have also targeted anomalies identified in the present survey results, along L12E and L19E (G. Wahl, HCA, pers. comm., 01/97).

The geologic setting of the property, below the 30-50m of glacio-fluvial overburden and 0-300m of Huronian cover rocks, features NE trending Archean rocks, with: a) volcanic tuffs to the south, b) followed by wackes, c) the Larder-Lake Break hosted with komatiites through the south-center, d) greywacke, e) trachytic volcanics in the center, and f) Blake River Group andesitic volcanics in the northern part of the grid area. These rocks are known to dip subvertically to steeply north. The Huronian cover is ÔOm thick to the grid-south, but thins-out near the baseline (P. Woods, HCA, pers. comm, 01/97).

4.2 SURVEY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

The Gradient-Realsection coverage at McGarry-Dasserat successfully defines signatures po tentially associated with geologic lithologies, structures and contacts, chemical alteration and, more importantly, indications of disseminated sulphide mineralization, likely to represent significant drill- targets. The large-dipole/deep penetration results map bulk chargeabilities and resistivity from sur face to 600m dep'.ns, yet appear to display a weak influence/correlation with the known geomorphol ogy - particularly the Huronian cover, which would have plagued all previous geophysical applica tions in the key Larder-Lake Break zone. This highlights, in particular, the deep penetration and high resolution capabilities of the RSIP technique and the Gradient array.

The resistivities results best provide information on the general geology. In plan, the apparent resistivities at McGarry-Dasserat vary widely in the moderate to highly resistive range (*:1k-40k Q- m), with spatial trends consistent with the faulted ultramafic to felsic rocks present across the prop erty. For example, two distinctive zones of anomalously high resistivity (M Ok Q-m) and high mag netism occuring north of BLO coincide with trachytic volcanic units (see interpretation plan map). Further north, two other similar high resistivity, but low magnetic rocks also likely coincide with Blake River Group felsic volcanics. In the main portion of the survey area, bulk resistivities generally in crease with northing, which could otherwise reflect the Huronian cover, however, the contours exhibit contrasting grid SE (EW geographic) continuous trends, and shorter NNE oriented lineaments This and the chargeability evidence both suggest that the Gradient resistivities map the east-striking geologic units which appear to be dislocated/displaced to the north along grid-NE trending displace-

12 Quantec

P158 HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.Addendum to Logistics Report

ment faults, possibly related to the Little Creek Fault trends (ref TAEL Geologic Compilation Map, Fig. 4, QIP file). Although unmapped, these inferred NS faults are nearly always corroborated in the magnetics results. Of interest, a transition from low (1k-2k Q-m) to moderate resistivity (3k-5k Q-m) suggests a subvertical contact occuring between 1S-3S and 500S-6S visible in plan (see interp. map), and is identified in Realsection as representing the steeply dipping greywacke-komatiite con tact (G. Wahl, HCI, pers. comm. 06/96). Locally, within the interpreted komatiite, anomalously low ( elk fJ-m) resistivities may represent the LLB - if so, it is also fault-displaced along the interpreted NNE faults (see interp. plan).

In Realsection, the resistivity units are well-defined and the subvertical nature of contour lines confirms that the geologic dips upright and is laterally heterogeneous. The effect of the Huronian cover is minimized in the 200m to 600m depth slices, but its presence is detected through: a) the weak layering observed in the chargeability sections, b) the transition from uniformly flat chargeabilities to stronger contrasts below the 200-300m levels, and c) the unusual, weak subhorizontal high resistivity layer at 300m, interpreted to be an overshoot marking a layer-boundary. Clearly, there fore, the excellent correlation between the known geology and the Realsections serve to highlight the excellent lateral and vertical resolution characteristics of the RSIP technique, in spite of 200-300 metres of cover rocks, known to exist across this portion of the survey area.

The chargeability results best provide information on the presence of disseminated to massive metallic mineralization, in the order of 1-20Xo or better. At McGarry-Dasserat the chargeabilities are weak to moderate (4-9 mV/V), which suggests a dominantly weak, disseminated sulphide distribution in the rocks, but also reflects the overburden cover and, to a lesser extent, possibly the silicic- alteration within rocks hosting the mineralization. Unlike the apparent resistivity results, the charge ability plan map does not display grid-wide trends - which again confirms that the Huronian cover has a weak influence on the deep AB results. On the other hand, the strongest chargeabilities occur: a) along the southern perimeter of the property, in close association with the LLB and the inferred komatiite/metasedimentary contact, as hoped, and b) to the grid-north, within the high resistivity band, interpreted to represent the Blake River felsites. Two cross-cutting trends are defined from the plan-view chargeabilities: a) a grid EW to ESE trend which parallels the resistivity banding and likely represent lithologic mineralization, and b) grid ENE to NE trends which parallel the inferred NNE faults and potentially represent the structurally-hosted mineralization hoped for.

The interpretation plan map presents the IP anomaly axes, their interpreted line-to-line correla tion, their resistivity association (High resistivity, Low resistivity or Nil resistivity) and, where sufficient detailed/Realsection coverage is available, the recommended DDH target-depth is also included. Also indicated are zones of contrasting, anomalous high and low resistivity , as well as inferred re sistivity contacts, according to their importance in the geologic model. All anomalies shown on the plan map have been tabled in Appendix F. A key-name has also been attributed to all significant (moderate or better = >'\.5x background) axes, most likely to represent potential drill-targets for tex tual reference. Anomalies with similar resistivity associations have been named arbitrarily, in no or der of importance, with high resistivity associations using letters and numbers (i.e., A1 to D6).

The anomalies described below have been prioritized according to their relative strength, re sistivity association, and strike-continuity, with the assumption that percent-sulphide content altera tion-type, and strike-length are the most appropriate economic indicators, according to the geologic model. Realizing that the relative priority of these targets may be subject to change, based on addi tional geoscientific information, those identified here all represent anomalies which are most likely to host significant mineralization, within the 200-350m depth range, based on the geophysics alone.

13 Quantec


4.2.1 First Priority Targets (B2. C1-C1'. A1-A2)* B2 is a grid ENE trending chargeability axis, in the grid-centre/west region, which appears to

be discordant to nearby trends and occurs along a well-defined geoelectric contact, which we interpret to represent a possible komatiite-greywacke transition, just north of the LLB It also represents the most well-defined chargeability anomaly identified in Realsections at McGarry-Dasserat., which suggest that it is subvertical, and extends downward from depths shallower than 200m, but is strongest at *350m depths to ÔOm. This resistivity-contact re lationship and above-average chargeability make it an excellent DDH targets, based on the Kerr-type geologic model.

* C1-C1' is a grid EW trending chargeability axis, in the grid south-west region, which appears to be near-concordant with nearby trends. It occurs on the edge of a narrow, subvertical high resistivity lineament, which marks the northern border of an anomalously low resistivity zone - hence this high p linear possibly represents the quartz-altered wacke lying in contact with the LLB-faulted/low resistivity Komatiite. Based on the Realsections, C1-C1' appears to strengthen and become better defined with easting, and along L14E, where it is best defined, it is steeply south-dipping and buried below 250-300m. Based on its similarities with B2, d' also merits a high priority - however, due to its position on the southern limit of the survey area, C1 should be better characterized using additional RSIP.

* A1-A2 is the only other well-defined IP axis characterized in Realsection at McGarry- Dasserat, and represents part of a narrow, subvertical, grid-EW trending, near-concordant high chargeability /low resistivity linear which occurs just north of the B2 contact zone. Fur ther west, based on its resistivity association, A1 either represents a concordant fault-fracture zone or a more porous, weakly mineralized metasedimentary unit. However, east of L13E, where B2 appears to crosscut the low p linear and subsequently pinch-out, A2 strengthens and becomes grid ENE trending - apparently coincident with an inferred NNE displacement fault. A2 appears to be vertically discontinuous (i.e. pinch and swell), and may be fault- displaced - exhibiting unusual dip behaviour. It appears to strengthen below 250-300m depths, but may pinch-out below 500m. Hence, based on its spatial relationship with B2 and possibly fault-fracture association, we assign a high second priority to A2 - recommending that it be tested following C1' and B2, as a potential mineralized fault-fracture zone.

4.2.2 Second Priority Targets (B3-B3'. B4. D2". D1'lThese axes, characterized in Realsection, feature weaker chargeabilities and shorter strike-

lengths relative to the high priority targets. B3-B3' and B4 are two closely subparalleling, discordant grid ENE mixed-resistivity axes which lie between the high priority B2/A2 and C1-C1' linears. D1-D1 and D2-D2'-D2" occur further south-east in a area poorly covered by RSIP, but which is indicated to possibly represent the LLB-faulted komatiitic rocks. Those retaining ihe greatest geologic interest can be drill-targeted based on the position and source-depths pro1 ided from the Realsections. . Subsequently, if these are shown to be attractive targets, they can then either be followed on strike or further detailed using RSIP.

4.2.3 Third Priority Targets (A3. B1. D1. D2-D2'. D3-D3'-D3". E1-ET. E2. E3)These axes represent moderate anomalies which have not been adequately characterized in

Realsection and can therefore not be DDH-targeted with confidence. However, if these retain suffi cient geologic interest, these can be drill-targeted based on the position provided in Appendix F and the interpretation plan maps - we strongly recommend, however, that these be first, further detailed using RSIP prior to additional folllow-up. Of note, D3-D3'-D3" and D2-D2' occur along contacts south of the zone of anomalous pA low and may therefore better represent the targeted silicified wacke/komatiite zone which was targeted south of the LLB. On the other hand, E1-D1', E2 and E3 all represent high resistivity, grid ESE trending linears which occur in a band of anomalously high resistivity in the NE section of the survey area - as a result, these likely represent weak, stratigraphic mineralization within Blake River volcanics, which may be of limited economic interest.

14 Quantec

P158 HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. Addendum to Logistics Report

The Gradient-Realsection IP surveys at McGarry-Dasserat were intended to provide deep ex ploration for shear-hosted Au- mineralization along a key komatiite/metasedimentary contact associ ated with the Larder Lake Break, in the 300-600m depth range, in an area that has historically proven difficult for conventional geophysical methods due to the deep Huronian cover. In response to the geologic objectives, the RSIP identified has identified at least three (3) deep high priority tar gets which resemble the target model, as well as four (4) other weaker anomalies of significance (see Table l). Those moderate anomalies which remain are poorly defined, due to an absence of Realsection coverage, and require additional follow-up work prior to DDH-targeting.

NUMBER

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.

NAME

B2C1-C1'

A284

B3-B3'D1-D1'D2'-D2"

PRIORITY

11

1.52

2.52.53

LINE

1200EE1400EE1400EE1300EE1300EE1900EE1900EE

STATION

138S31 2S

100S-112S262S188S438S500S

TARGET DEPTH

250m350m

350rrn-450m350m400m450m550m

COMMENTS

Discordant, contact-type, vertically extensive.Near-concordant, contact-type, south-dip.Discordant, conductive fault-fracture-type.Discordant, silicified-type, north-dip, pinches out.Discordant, mixed-type, south-dip?, vert-extensiveNear-concordant conductive-type, north-dip?Near-concordant, conductive-type, south-dip

Table l: Recommended DDH-Targets at McGarry-Dasserat.We recommend that these results be compared with existing geologic data prior to drill-testing.

We also recommend that additional RSIP coverage be added to provide adequate depth- determinations for targets away from the main survey area.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

QUANTEC IP INC.

G. R. Jeffrey Wame Senior Geophysicist

j Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (QC) Senior Geophysicist

J

J

J

J

Andrew Oswald Processing Geophysicist

Porcupine, ON February, 1997.

15 Quantec

J


STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:l, G.R. Jeffrey Wame, hereby declare that:

1. l am a geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this ca pacity with Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l studied Engineering Geophysics in the Faculty of Applied Science at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, completing all but two of the course requirements fora B.Sc.(Eng.) in 1981.

3. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1981 in Canada, the United States and Chile.

4. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of either Homestake Canada Inc., or their joint-venture partners on this project.

5. l oversaw the geophysical work undertaken, validated the data acquired and hereby ascertain the in tegrity of the information therein.


Porcupine, Canada February, 1997

,.R. Jeffrey Wame General Manager Quantec IP Inc.

Quantec


J

J

.J

J

J

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:l, Jean M. Legault, declare that:

1. l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and am presently employed in this capacity as the director of technical services for Quantec IP Inc. of Waterdown, Ontario.

2. l obtained a Bachelor's Degree, with Honours, in Applied Science (B.A.Sc.), Geological Engineering (Geophysics Option), from Queen's University at Kingston, Ontario, in Spring 1982.

3. l am a registered professional engineer (# 047032), with license to practice in the Province of Quebec, since 1985.

4. l have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1982, in North-America, South-America and North-Africa.

5. l am a member of the Society of Engineers of Quebec, the Quebec Prospectors Association, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

6. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Homestake Canada Inc., or their joint-venture partners in this project.

7. l interpreted the data, with the assistance of GRJ Wame, wrote the report, oversaw the final drawings included and hereby attest to their accuracy herein.


Porcupine, Ontario February, 1997

Jean M. Legault, P.Eng. (QC) Chief Geophysicist Quantec Group

Director Technical Services

Quantec

r i

J

l

J

J

J


STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:l, Andrew Oswald, declare that:

1 l am currently employed by Quantec Consulting Inc. of Porcupine, Ontario as a processing geophysicist.

2. l am a graduate of Cambrian College, Sudbury, ON, on May, 22,1996 with a Diploma in Geo logical Engineering Technology.

3. l have no interest nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Homestake Canada Inc., or its joint-venture partners in this project.

4. l drafted the interpretation map, based on the instruction provided to me by JM Legault, and geographic information made available by Homestake Canada Inc.

Porcupine, Ontario February, 1997

Andrew Oswald Processing Geophysicist

" ] Quantec Technical Services J

Quantec

P158 HOMESTAKE CANADA INC Addendum to Logistics Report

APPENDIX F

ANOMALY TABLE

LINE

1000E

1000E

1000E

1000 E

1000E

1100E

1100E

11 DOE

1100E

1100E

1100E

1100E

1100E

1100E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1200E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1300E

1400E

1400E

1400E

1400E

1400E

1400E

l 1400E

1400E

STATION

-200

-137

68

-12

63

-338

-300

-237

-188

-137 l

-88

-37

12

75

-388

-288

-212

"~ -137

-88

-37

12

88

150

212

-337

-300

-237

-188

-88

-37

12

112

250

-600

-500

-412

-375

-325

-212

-162

-112

ASSOCIATION

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Nil

High

Low

Nil

Nil

Nil

Low

Nil

Low

Nil

Low

Low

Low

Nil

Nil

Nil

Low

Nil

High

High

Nil

Low

Low

Nil

High

Low

Low

Low

Low

Nil

High

Nil

Low

DEPTH

n/a

400+^50

300^500

250+M50

^50

>500?

n/a

^50

250+>4QO

350

*300

>400?

n/a

n/a

300?

350?

^75

300*^500

^0?

^00

QUALITY

End of Line

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

End of Line

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

End of Line

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

End of Line

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

COMMENTS

ZoneB2

ZoneBI

ZoneAI

ZoneC2

Zoned

ZoneB3

ZoneB2

ZoneAI

ZoneC2

Zoned'

ZoneB3

ZoneB2

ZoneAI

ZoneC2

Zoned'

ZoneB4

ZoneB3'

ZoneB2

Zone D3

Zone C1'

ZoneA2

Quantec


LINE

1400E

1400E

1400E

1400E

1400 E

1400E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1500E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1600E

1700E

1700E

1700 E

1700E

1700 E

1700E

1700E

1700E

1700E

1800E

1800E

1800E

1800 E

1800E

1800E

1800E

1800E

STATION

-37

12

62

112

186

250

-562

-512

-437

-400

-288

-212

-88

-12

37

112

-562

-512

-462

-388

-337

-288

-200

-137

-88

-25

37

112

-575

-500

425

-337

-275

-188

-162

12

88

-588

-500

-412

-337

-262

-212

-137

^2

ASSOCIATION

High

Low

High

Low

Nil

High

Nil

Low

Nil

Low

Nil

Nil

Low

Nil

High

High

Nil

Low

Low

Low

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

High

High

High

Low

Low

Nil

Nil

Low

Nil

High

High

High

Nil

Nil

Low

Low

High

High

Nil

High

DEPTH

^50

QUALITY

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

End of Line

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

End of Line

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

COMMENTS

ZoneA2

Zone D2

Zone D3"

ZoneD2

ZoneDI

Zone 03'

Zone D2'

Zone D1'

Quantec


LINE

1800E

1800E

1800E

1900E

1900E

1900 E

1900E

1900E

1900E

1900 E

1900E

1900 E

1900E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2000E

2100E

21 00 E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2100E

2200E

2200E

2200E

STATION

-25

62

112

-600

-512

-437

-362

-288

-237

-188

-62

12

112

-562

-512

-450

-375

-288

-212

-100

-12

62

112

-462

-362

-262

-212

-150

-88

-25

62

137

188

237

312

388

437

488

588

637

725

900

-400

-237

-188

ASSOCIATION

High

High

High

Nil

Low

Low

Low

Nil

High

Nil

High

Nil

Nil

High

Low

Low

Low

High

High

High

High

High

Nil

Low

Nil

Nil

Low

High

Nil

High

High

Low

High

Low

Nil

Nil

Nil

High

High

High

High

High

Nil

Nil

Nil

DEPTH

n/a

^50?

^50

^50

:-450

^0

>450

n/a

QUALITY

Weak

Weak

Weak

End of Line

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Questionable

End of Line

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Questionable

End of Line

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Questionable

Questionable

Questionable

Questionable

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

End of Line

End of Line

Questionable

Weak

COMMENTS

Zone 03'

Zone 02"

Zone D1'

Zone A3

Zone D3'?

Zone 02"

Zone 01'

Zone D1'

ZoneE!

ZoneE2

Zone 01'?

Quantec


UNE

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

2200E

STATION

-137

-88

0

50

200

237

337

450

537

612

688

800

912

ASSOCIATION

High

High

High

High

Low

High

Low

Nil

Nil

High

High

Nil

High

DEPTH QUALITY

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Questionable

Questionable

Questionable

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

End of Line

COMMENTS

ZoneDI'

ZoneEZ

ZoneE3

3 J J j

Quantec


SURVEY COSTS

;j

j j j

j jri Quantec

Quantec IP IncorporatedPC) Box l 170, Suile 34, 35 Mam Slreel North, Waterdown, Oitano. Canada LOR 2HO Telephone (905) 689-0600 Fax (905) 689-6404

ToHomestake Canada Inc.POBox 1163Suite 26, 637 Algonquin Blvd.Timmins, OntarioP4N 7H9ATTENTION: Peter Wood

J)1998 i

INVOICEJune 13, 1996

Project: P-158

Invoice: 1133

G ST. Reg. No R104359724

RE: McGarry-Dasserat Project

Pre-billing: McGarry-Dasserat Project

G.S.T. @7 07o

Total

S6,000.00

S 420.00

56,420.00

Terms: Payable Upon Receipt Please remit to the above address

p ;7.2o 4, ooo

Quantec IP IncorporatedP.O. Box 1170, Suite 34, 35 Main Street North, Waterdown, Ontario, Canada. LOR 2HO Telephone (905) 689-0600 Fax (905) 689-6404

June 30, 1996

Homestake Canada Inc. PO Box 1163Suite 26, 637 Algonquin Blvd. Timmins, ON P4N 7H9

Attention: Peter Wood

S JUL l ^1996 .IInvoice:1144

Project: P-158

G.S.T. Reg. No.: R138472931

RE: RSIP Survey over the McGarry Twp. Property

tf)cofp CC

HOfr

Extsn

DescriptionSurvey Period: June 11 -21, 1996

Survey Charges

2 days Mobilization/Demobilization @ S5007day 9 days RSJP Survey @ Sl8937day

Equipment Rental

9 days Truck @ 375/day

Execution Expenses (accommodation, meals, fuel, disposibles)

Administration - 15%

Less Prebilling

Subtotal

ESTAKE CANADA INC

Site CC

00000

NatAcct

1220

AppruvwJSub-Acct

00650

Arppunt, .^ -Terms-PaM___

Invoice may 67

The Toro

igbje Upon Receipt

paid by direct deposit to

ito Dominion Bank J44-Ad :laide Street West

1 oronto, ON1992-0302135

Charge

51,000.0017,037.00

1,885.08

282.76

(6,000.00)

l^/O^/^tt

FEE 25 "37 12 : 10 QUflNTEC-CONSULTING INCo P.2

Quantec IP IncorporatedP.O. Box 1170. Suite 34. 35 Main Stnet North, Waterdown. Ontario. Canada, LOR 2HO Telephone (905) 689-0600 Fix (903) 689-6404

February 25, 1997

Homestake Canada Inc. PO Box 1163Suite 26, 637 Algonquin Blvd. Timmins, ON P4N 7H9

Attention: Peter Wood

Invoice: 1217

Project; P 158

G.ST. Reg. No.: RI38472931

McGarrv - Daaiarat AiitsimtBt Report

DescriptionConsulting Period:

Co Plaiting

January 29 - February 21, 1 997

Review project, QC Assessment requirements Si interpretation maps and report (3 copiw)

2. 5 Days @ S 750. 00 1 day

by J.M. Legault ft A. Oswald

/3). -

Subtotal

GST @ 707d

Total:

Terms. Payable Upon Receipt

Invoice may be paid by direct deposit to

The Toronto Dominion Bank 141 Adelaide S erect West

Toronto, ON Accl. #: 1992-0302135

Charge

1,875.00

1,875.00

131.25

S2.006.2S

QIP PROJECT P-158 - HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. - PRODUCTION SUMMARY

McGARRY/DASSERAT PROJECTEAL SECTION IP SURVEY

DATE11-Jun12-Jun13-Jun

14-Jun

15-Jun

16-Jun

17-Jun

18-Jun

19-Jun

20-Jun

- --

21-Jun

DESCRIPTIONMob to V-Town,check out grid locationStart set up AB 4000 @ L-14+OOE at 2000S to2000NGo to timmins to get gen/set, finish AB, test equip, lightning storm PM.Change AB X3\end up with 3900 AB@L14E 1900N to 2000SL-11E39L-12E39L-13E39L-14E39L-15E39L-16E39L-17E39L-18E39L-19E39L-20E39L-21E39

L-21E39L-22E39move over to L-10EL-10E39L-9E39 -bad data. Hydro.tracks run parallel for 150 south, call Jeff.Shrink AB size to 3100 @L14E 1500N to 1600Snot enough current.dig pits XS.George, Peter outL-14E31L-13E31L-12E31L-19E31Change Ab XS.dig pits X8 Ab 2500 @L-14E 1200N to 1300S.L-19E25L-14E25L-13E25L-12E25Set up Ab2000@ L-14E 700N to 1300S dig extra pits L-12E20L-13E20L-14E20Set up Ab1500 @ L-14E 700N to 800SL-14E15L-13E15L-12E15Start winding up wire/packing up/call Jeff/Finish winding wire/demob to Tlmmins/meet client at office

TOTALS

LINE

1100E1200E1300E1400E1500E1600E1700E1800E1900E2000E2100E

2100E2200E

1000E

900E

1400E 1300E1200E1900E

1900E1400E1300E1200E

1200E1300E1400E

1400E1300E1200E

START

150N350S250N250N600S150N600S150N600S150N450S

300N900N

150N

150N0

350S150S

600S0

350S0

~325S"

25S450S

0325S25S

END

375S250N350S600S150N600S150N800S150N600S300N

900N400S

175S

I450S350S

0BOOS

150S450S

0350S

~25S"

325S0

450S25S325S

TOTAL (m)

525600600850750750750750750750750

6001300

325

600350350450

450450350350

300"

300450

450300300

15,500

CHARGE5500.00

51,893.00

5946.50

51, 893.00

51 .893.00

51, 893.00

51.893.00

51.893.00

51,893.00

51.893.00

-- -

51.446.50

518,037.00

Page 1Quantec

OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Declaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land

Mining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.O. 1990

Transaction Number (office use)

: W 30^0035bAssessment Files Research Imaging

Personal information Mining Act. the inform Questions about this 933 Ramsey Lake Ro

32D04NE0157 2.17232 MCGARRY

Instructions: - l- Please type or print in ink.

900

l 66(3) ol the Mining Act. Under section 8 of the vork and correspond with the mining land holder Northern iêlopment ar|^Mi*es. 6th Floor,

. 17 2 3 2^ ^.M ,,ii, use form 0240.

1. Recorded hotder(s) (Attach a list if necessary)Name

Address

9r* i W /f IK- //vr,

cW r^c- //i v*T" (A) . (^-(^(^ ro , o S/

u . ///o /-' 3 P. 7

N"ame '

Address

2. Type of work performed: Checl-

Client Number

i a i v ioTelephone Number

Fax Number

//-^/W 1 X c:' tj ^ f? r-? 2 j ^fOt^T/ fc?t5/ 7 ^ . J X

Client Number

TETTE1 V E DFax Number

. APR 1 1 1QQ7

MINING LANDS BRANCH

0 Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, i i Physical: drilling, stripping, l l Rehabilitation assays and work under section 18 (regs) l ' trenching and associated assays ' '

Work Type

/'i \ . - r -y cL- ro.A w *v\ v v ^ coey

Dates Work ^ ^ T Performed From /' O C- 7k ^' O 6 ?t?

Day Month Year Day Month Year

Global Positioning System Data (if available) Township/Area

f^f\ f ' —^

M or G-Plan Number lf ~2 7 "7 c/ v-/ ^ (f? 7 /j

Office Use

Commodity

Total S Value of ^ Work Claimed 7 ^ ^ ' ^

NTS Reference

Mining Division /

Resident Geologist District J^ /^

Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.

3. Person or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Name

j 1" \ \ ~ ^ i ( v^ V *- C (~\ Âddress \

9 o . vv A 5- * M //^ re M^, YXC- O*A Por\N i c nName ' ^ 1 ~

A^ ( . ^ Ve,,c, ,,\-VAddress -i

Name ' '

a.^ f -^,^, r^.^.r,\ AAddress v

t~} i ~\ T /^~i

l f ' \'\2^ 5-iS; -. . icTCv\o,rse OrA ^C-Â C O

Telephone Number

( 70, -s) 3L3 ^' - -^ /^ ^Fax Number

^ 7*^X2 ~?-r- j .0 K /rTelephone Number

Fax NumbeT

( 7C)i. ) ^ ^ s' 'o?,^? S 3Telephone Number

Fax Number .

f7 Tf) s ) ^ ^ 'T -0--0s'.t)

4. Certification by Recorded Holder or Agent

l, V c-"- \ *P c- Vj- t r, r^ q______ , do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set(Print Name)

forth in this Declaration of Assessment Work having caused the work to be performed or witnessed the same during

or after its completion an^l, to the best of my knowledge, the annexed report is true.

Telephone Number

Date

./^ Fax Number

7- 7/-

/Wf 4 07

5. Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoinir the mining land where work was performed, at the time work was performed. A map showing the contiguous linti must accpmpany this form. S

Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on other eligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.

eg

eg

eg

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

TB 7827

1234567

1234568

(^MMT- \3

Ltj-^T-lU

^/•jpvqf f ^2- / f \f~*\ ^** 'O 1 ' *ii ^lî

Number of Claim Units. For other mining land, list hectares.

16 ha

12

2

l

l

1

-4 ——

Column Totals

Value of work performed on this claim or other mining land.

S26, 825

0

S 8, 892

*l 2KZ.

P,Vp;V

*Z1QZ. -

Value of work applied to this claim.

N/A

S24,000

S 4,000

*i anoi, a oo,^ ann.

10*.

*i3, 70S".

Value of work assigned to other mining claims.

S24,000

0

0

^ 5.

; P tt' '

O -i* A

RE

-M

MINIh

^ ?n^

Bank. Value of worl\ to be distributed \ at a future date. *

52.825

0

S4.892

y 9 Q oA

CEIVEDJ

PR 1 1 1997

G LANDS BRANCH

l, , do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under(Prim Full Name)

subsection 7 (1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to

the claim where the work was done.Authorized in Writing Date

6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved.

Some of the credits claimed in this declaration may be cut back. Please check ( ^ ) in the boxes below to show how

you wish to prioritize the deletion of credits:

D 1. Credits are to be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option 2 or 3 or 4 as indicated.

W 2. Credits are to be cut back starting with the claims listed last, working backwards; or

O 3. Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims listed in this declaration; or

D 4. Credits are to be cut back as prioritized on the attached appendix or as follows (describe):

Note: If you have not indicated how your credits are to be deleted, credits will be cut back from the Bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.

For Office Use OnlyReceived Stamp

RECEIVED

Ontario Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Transaction Number (office use)

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of subsection 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This Information will be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recqator, Ministry o^prtjpin Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5.cqator,O f*

Work Type

QrcwA.p^-A TVS^TOey'

Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, list the number of hours/days worked, metres of drilling, kilo metres of grid line, number of samples, etc.

1. ^V Kr^

Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization).

Transportation Costs

Food and Lodging Costs

Cost Per Unit of work

^DS-.^

RE Af

MININCMMHBWM

Total Value of Assessment Work

Total Cost

•*.3?o6.

CEi ven

R 1 1 lyy/

I.LANDS BRANCH

*Z 103~.

Calculations of Filing Discounts:

1. Work filed within two years of performance is claimed at 10007o of the above Total Value of Assessment Work.2. If work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 50*M) of the Total Value of Assessment Work. If this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK x 0.50 Total f value of worked claimed.

Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for credit.- A recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 45 days of a request for verification and/or correction/clarification. If verification and/or correction/clarification is not made, the Minister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Certification verifying costs:

l, , do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as mayprint lull nwira)

reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on

the accompanying Declaration of Work form as ex O g TV -V-_______________ l am authorized(recorded hol^r, agent, of state company position with signing authority)to make this certification.

k

0212(02/96)

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

June 10, 1997

Roy SpoonerMining Recorder4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, ONP2N 1A2

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines Ontario

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: Fax:

(705) (705)

670-5853 670-5863

Dear Sir or Madam:

Subject: Transaction Number(s): W9780.00256

Submission Number: 2.17232

StatusApproval

We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s).

The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS

SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.

If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the

notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision,

subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work

which has received a 45 Day Notice.

Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by

the response date on the summary.

NOTE: This correspondence may affect the status of your mining lands. Please contact the Mining

Recorder to determine the available options and the status of your claims.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steve Beneteau by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5855.

Yours sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BYRon C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands SectionMines and Minerals Division

Correspondence ID: 10922

Copy for: Assessment Library

Work Report Assessment Results

Submission Number: 2.17232

Date Correspondence Sent: June 10, 1997 Assessor: Steve Beneteau

First Claim Number

Transaction Number

W9780.00256 644715

Section:14 Geophysical IP

Township(s) l Area(s)

MCGARRY

Status

Approval

Approval Date

June 09, 1997

Correspondence to:

Mining Recorder Kirkland Lake, ON

Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, ON

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON

Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):

Peter C. WoodTIMMINS, ONTARIO, CANADA

HOMESTAKE CANADA INC. VANCOUVER, B.C.

Page: l

Correspondence ID: 10922

CL

UJ

O

OSSIAN TWP.

THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM /ARIOUS SOURCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER. MiNISlHY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.

1189648 l 1146261 i 1 --"t!*f1205890

1200023 I202670-- - ——-1 1 12004^5 41189653 , 00

, ^- - - -L ~

1189647 . 1146394 , 1189649 l: - l l l

-. -JJi..J--...l 1203304

v IP89646 120030^ o --1187016 1187017 }

1202672187014 84293844544^7:7^,, eA-~^GT*t?3Zt - H-xT—A,_JiMv~i yi^fftf-L J\ ^*~-T —*r/*- — K—1193121

" i! *'/ 1 s/'/i sIW5857 iL 41006 l L4l007

Ty CD L l 2 403

L 33164 /LI2399 \ L. 12400" L33I6? ' L.35358—— L 33033—T--r#--

L.33325 \L 40999 /L.

L 30780

12171678CLM 298 H k iP7jB,7-

38626 "!" 7650871

— —-/--3-0-7-6-5 - L. 6623

32766 L 33017

65089 76509(St

30771 \ 31552 765075

30778 \H67665{ -111523041185527

L.3 l 0^9 l L . {Q1167658 1^J 31094

1|85529 . 30764OL 565393 B P"* -' 40804 L 40805 V

L. \l L 33047 l L i 3304833046 ^ 11870 5) 02761856331096

L.S2733

J2732 ' /L. 32734

-y-L. 11980 25489

L,25478 L. 25194

1205607\IM32743 V-A" 74

736736

II80C.737426

Northeast i O 737433 i O

-4/777 Q J __

249\23 JT24924 of Larder

1221796 - l 180052

26044 l L.6618

1221797

736734

ITB0057

12026731 IIIOC77^3 3342 l

1184102

ARCHIVED MAY I. 1994

ARCHfVED JUNE 17/96

MCFADDEN TWP.

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS -

SURVEYED UNESTOWNSHIF'S. BASE LINES, ETC.LOTS. MINING CLAIMS PARCELS. ETC

UNSURVEYEO LINES:LOT LINE:; -

PARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS tTC -

RAILWAY AND MIGHT OF WAY -*

UTILITY LINE:S -

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM ~

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SDBDIVISIOrj OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESEHVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

VINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOLUSE PERMITS . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PÊNT. SURFACE Si MINING RIGHTS — — ..-.—

.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY^. _ .....,........

. MINING RIGHTSONLY __ ,.. ____ .. ...

LEASE, SURFACE i MINING RIGHTS—————

" .SURFACE RIGHTSONLY. _ ..,..,.-.^.......

" .MINING RIGHTSONLY.-—— ——— ———

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ................,............. 1

ORDER IN COUNCIL .... ^. . - ^ — — —. .. ..-— OC

RESERVATION , . - ... ......... 0

CANCELLED . . ,. .. , . ®

fc. ...-. ......... -. — - .- . 0

B

O

'100 FOOT (122 METER) SURFACE RIGHTS RESERVATION ALONG THE SHORTS OF ALL LAKES a RIVERS

SCALE: 1 INCH ^ 20 CHAINS

R E FERENCES

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGH.TSONLY

M.* S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

Ocieription Ord*r No. DIM Dopowtion FM*

HKIIUING DISPOSITION FOR SURFACE 8 MINING RIGHTS - SECTION 30(B) - NOV. l, I99O KFF. FILE LLAN-IG-4.

PROPOSED WATERMAIN FOR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM

AGGREGATE PERMITS FOR BEDROCK ONLYD^scri:.-'i(.r, i/1 ! 'R File ,- ' 'Z' r }

ALL MINING CLAIMS STAKED IN THE LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION HAVE THE PREFIX "L".

TOWNSHIP

MCGARRYM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

KIRKLAND LAKEMINING DIVISION

LARDER L

WCO

\ *. LAND TITLES/ REGIST& DIVISION

CD i

CKl

O)

00

o*

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Ministry of ~ Northern Development ancj Mines

OaieJULY,1990

CIRCULATED JAN. 20/93

Number

OCD

H ^TJ

G-3678O l

or -^ oo

32DWN60157 2. 17232 MCGARRY 200

INTERPRETATION PU\N MAP 78.17232

Magnetic

A2 jtiif'M M JBUtK H H

J

o Si

x

x.

CHARGEABILITY

Questionable

JJ Week

Moderate

Strong

Very Stro/fg7

CHANGEABILITY AXES

Hefh Resistivity Association (Major, Minor)

/Low Resistivity Association (Major, Minor)

Nil/Contact Resistivity Association (Major, Minor)

- Resistivity Association- Target Depth

A 1 Refer to Text

High Resistivity ZoneLow Resistivity Zone

Magnetic Low Zone

. High Low Resistivity Contact

X. UTM Reference Coordinates N

Gradient Arrav-AB

^H2)-

MN

RECEIV

05 199

MINING LANDS BRplot points

Scale 1:500050 O 50 100 150 200 250 300

J i- (metres)v5

HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.MCGARRY, DASSERAT PROJECT

McGarry.Dasserat Twp.

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

INTERPRETATION PLAN MAPAB= 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50 % duty cycle) Transmitter Current 7.4 to 8.0 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (40ms to 1770ms)25 meters

*5 h34-3

Station Interval:

Interpretation by: J. Legault

.oDate: June, 1996Instrumentation: Rx ^ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx - PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-30(30 kVA)

y kL F f

^ z

Surveyed A Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG. #: P-15B-INT-3

ED

LINE 12+OOE APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

300S 200S l

1005 l

100N l

2DON l

O —

-100 —

-200 —

-300—l

Q.LU O

-400 —

-500

-600 —

300S 2006 100ST O

r—O

^--100

—-200

O m -D

-300

—-400

^-500

— -600

100N 200N

LINE 12+OOE

Gradient Array————AB ————

plot points

jfc.l? O f'

^ Sale 1:250025 O 25 50 75 100 125 150" " ~3T — — "-—— ~- '

(^

HOMESTAKE CANACA, INC.McGARRY-DASSERAT PROJECT

McGarry Twp., ON, Dasserat Twp., QC

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY REALSECTION L 12+OOE

APPARENT RESISTIVITYAB^SOO to 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50?! duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.2 to 7.4 Amps Decay Curve: QtP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 354.0ms)Station Interval: 25 metersResistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decadeColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning

Date: July, 1996Instrumentation: Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx ~ PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f. P-158-RSIP-RES-1

1000E 1100E 1200EAPPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

1300E 1400E 1500E 1600E 1700E 180DE 1900E l l l l l l l

2DOOE 21 GOE l

2200E l

900N-

80GN —

TOON —

60CN —

500N —

40QN —

300N-

200N-

10CN —

O —

100S —

20QS-

300S —

40QS-

500S —

— 900N

— SOON

-TOONo 10 eg

728TS7—--^53393. 57902-7-——67851.

— 600N

146J27. 147.98.-500N

600S —

— 400N

-300N

— 200N

-100N

Gradient Array ———AB———

2.17232 plot points

-O'

— 100S

-200S

-300S

• —400S

-500S

50Scale 1:5000

50 100 ISO 200 250 300a^^"B(nwtrra)

-600S

1000E 1100E 1200E 1300E 1400E 1500E 1600E 1700E 1800E 1900E 2000El l

21 COE 2200E

HOMESTAKE CANADA INC.MCGARRY, DASSERAT PROJECT

McGarry, Dasserat Townships

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array

APPARENT RESISTIVITYAf^ 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hi (5QZ, duty cycle) Transmitter Current 7.4 to 8.0 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (40ms to 1770ms)Station Interval: 25 metersResistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decadeColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning

Date: June, 1996Instrumentation: Rx ^ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed A Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. #: P158-PLAN-RES-2

LINE 13+OOE TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

3005 l

200S 100S l l

100N l

200N l

O —

-100

-200 —

-300 —

Q.UJ Q

-400 —

-500 —

CD

—t tO

-600 —

— O

h--100

——200

O m -o

—-300

—-400

—-500

—-600

30QS 200S 100S 100N 200N

LINE 13+OOE


2 1723225

plot pants

Scale 1:250025 50__75 100 125 150

•J h.(metres)

oCO CM

HOMESTAKE CANADA, INC.McGARRY-DASSERAT PROJECT

McGarry Twp., ON, Dosserat Twp., QC

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY REALSECTION L13+OOE

TOTAL CHARGEABILITYAB^SOO to 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (505J duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.2 to 7.4 Amps Decoy Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 354-Oms)Station Interval: 25 metersChargeability Contour Interval: 0.5, 2.5 mV/VColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning


Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) -f MG-30(30 kVA)

Surveyed 8 Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG. #: P-158-RSIP-CHG-2


600S 500S 400S 300Sl

ZOOS 100S-J—100N

-100 —

-200 —

uf.5

12

Q- Lul O

-300 —

——100

——200

-400 —

-500 —

-600 —

600S 500S 400S 300S ZOOS 100ST

O

O m -o

——300

—-400

o h-CM

——500

——600

100N

LINE 19+OOE


17232 plot points

25Scale 1:2500

25 SO 75 100 125 150J^^^^S~

(metres)

HOME5TAKE CWACA, NC.McGARRY-DASSERAT PROJECT

McGarryTwp.. ON, Dasserat Twp., QC

TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEYREALSECTION L19+OOE

APPARENT RESISTIVITY^2500 to 3900 meter

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50X duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.2 to 7.4 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval: 25 meters Resistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decade Colour Scale: Equal Area Zoning

Date: ju|y , 1995Instrumentation: Rx * IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)


Surveyed A Processed by:QUANTEC IP INC.

DWG. #: P-158-RSIP-RES-4

LINE 19+OOE TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

600S 500S 400Sl

300S ZOOS 100S OJ.100N

l

o —

-100 —

-200 —

-300 —

O.LU O

en tn en * en en en en

-400 —

-500 —

-600 —

600S 500S 400S 300S 200S 100ST O

— O

——100

——200

a m-o

——300s f

-400

——500

——600

100N

32D04NE0157 2.17232 MCGARRY 280

LINE 19+OOE

Gradient Array

.lotjjpints

2*172*2- Scale 1:2500

25 O 25 50__75 100 125 150~ - jji^^c:

(metres)

HOMESTAKE CWCA, MG.McGARRY-DASSERAT PROJECT



TOTAL CHARGEABILITY^2500 to 3900 meter

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50/5 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.2 to 7.4 Amps

Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)

Station Interval: 25 meters

Chargeability Contour Interval: 0.5, 2.5 mV/V

Colour Scale: Equal Area Zoning

Date: July, 1996

Instrumentation: Rx s IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)



QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. #: P-158-RS1P-CHG-4

rsi

8o l

m s- m

Ollen

O

l O

O

O

O

J

en

. fsa

"e

n' V

hi

OJ

O

^ -

^ -vi

an

w

01 h

oo\ -

~j /o

* [e

n --j

-vi

•'•l*

r\4

**'*

**

.*! A

aJiJ.

l!S,.N

i. t-j

OJ

—*

—k

OJ

—*

. \

f Y

/'""X

\ -'.*

. ^

i?" ."^

.i**.l

4^ fi

fi

01 5

r in

^ i

o

co

-i*.

OD

-*

en

J*,

o

to

isa

to

OJ'

o

en 0"—

"'—

'^

ua'o

j W

o

^"o

o'c

xT

tn

^*

i i

i i

i i

to

S

a

II 5s

z

x Ln

II

S S

-5

.Z75

o i -

^

l en

01

O O

CO

1-3!

5*8

S iP

&s-

H-f

e? S

-

l 5"

82*3

S

3 3

til

if? " e?

03-2

'SS

7 "l

O)

IP —

C7I

l ~

K

S-a

llilsi

P

fi

l•2

*8

ffrt

^

-***fc

l ̂ *

"S:S

*i^J

S o

1^Sg

. 5-4?

3 S

3 S.

v^5^

^

5

^ S5

?S?"

^s&s

SsE

® ^

S J

* 3 z

25 jo

z*.

z3

^ >

"0

~ q

co

o

c^ 5

5-

OD8

o gs- o

o

o

O l i—i- 2?

2

/

3200

4NE

0157

2 1

7232

MC

GA

RR

Y29

0

LINE 14+00E TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)

600S 5005 400S l

300S 200S 100S O J.

o —

-100 —

-200 —

-300 —

o.UJ Q

-400 —

100N —l—

200N

-500 —

OJ - OJ OJ OJ OJ

-600 —

— O

-100

——200

— -30Q-H IT

——400

——500

——600

600S 500S 400S 300S 200S 100S 100N 200N

32D04NE0157 2.17232 MCGARRY 300

LINE 14+OOE

Gradient Array

2 .1723225

plot points

Scale 1:250025 50 75 100 125 150" ~~HHH5HC" — "~"

(metres)




TOTAL CHARGEABILITYAB^SOO to 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current

0.0625 Hz (50?? duty cycle) 1.2 to 7.4 Amps

Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)

Station Interval: 25 metersChargeability Contour Interval: 0.5, 2.5 mV/VColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning


Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG-30(30 kVA)


QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. #: P-158-RSIP-CHG-3


600S l

5005 l

400S l

300S l

200S l

100S l

O i

100N l

2QON l

O —

-100 —

-200 —

-300 —

-400 —

-500

—. —* en

-600 —

h~0

——100

——200 32D04NE0157 2.17232 MCGARRY 310

O m

— -300

——400

— -500

—-800

600S 500S 400S 300S 200S 100Sl O

l 100N 200N

LINE 14+OOE

Gradient Array —————AB—————

25

plot pointsi

Scale 1:250025 50__75 100 t25 150J l la - - - - —— - — -

(metres)

HOME5TAKE CANADA, INC.McGARRY-DASSERAT PROJECT



APPARENT RESISTIVITYABÎSOO to 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (50/5 duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.2 to 7.4 Amps Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Cuslom Semilogarithmic Windows

10 Gates (60ms to 3540ms)Station Interval: 25 metersResistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decadeColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning

Date: July, 1996Instrumentation: Rx ^ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx = PHOENIX IPT-2B(15 kW) t MG~30(30 kVA)

Surveyed Se Processed by:

QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. #: P-15B-RSIP-RES-3

LINE 13+OOE APPARENT^ RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)

30QS 200Sl100S —L-

100N 200Nl

o—— o

-100 ——-100

-200 ——-200

of-l

CL LU Q

-300

-400 —

CO enO4

-500 —

ODOJ en

— *JWsg i a/

S toto

•** lo 01 13

to 01-vj ^*- ^1 - tTJ

OOJ DC,

-600

C71-JOi

4w tnO) - enCJl (O10 . Ni

-vj

sfo

o m"D

— -300

—-400

o CMCO

—-500

—-600

300S 200S 100S 100N 200N

LINE 13+OOE

Gradient Array———AB——

~ ̂ v- x t - — -

25

plot points

Scale 1:250025 SO 75 100

sesssa(metres)

125 15O




APPARENT RESISTIVITYAB^1500 to 3900 meters

Transmitter Frequency 0.0625 Hz (507. duty cycle) Transmitter Current 1.2 to 7.4 Amps

Decay Curve: QIP IP-6 Custom Semilogarithmic Windows10 Gates (60ms to 354-Oms)

Station Interval: 25 meters

Resistivity Contour Interval: 10 levels/log decade

Colour Scale: Equal Area Zoning

Date: July, 1996

Instrumentation: Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)

Tx * PHOENIX PT-2B(15 kW) * MG-30(30 kVA)


QUANTEC IP INC.DWG. f P-158-RSIP-RES-2

Documents

Geophysical Survey Logistical Report 23