9
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) me: Industry Seismic Interpretation seismic: Multiple 3D reflection images over time a optimization of reservoir production lt structures are especially challenging but have b focus of innovation imaging is a tool of growing importance; electrica resistivity is sensitive to fluids and clay content wledge of geological processes key to nterpretation!!!! BUT, it’s critically important to recognize artefacts/processing limitations e seismic reflection data.

Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Geology 5660/6660Applied Geophysics

26 Feb 2014

© A.R. Lowry 2014For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5)

Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation• 4D seismic: Multiple 3D reflection images over time aid in optimization of reservoir production• Salt structures are especially challenging but have been a focus of innovation• EM imaging is a tool of growing importance; electrical resistivity is sensitive to fluids and clay content• Knowledge of geological processes key to interpretation!!!! BUT, it’s critically important to also recognize artefacts/processing limitations of the seismic reflection data.

Page 2: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

TNMO ˙ = x 2

2t0V12

Note: If you see something like this:

… Your ppt font interpreter is missingsomething that’s in my equation editor.

(Feel free to ask Xiaofei or I about it.)

Page 3: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Ground Penetrating Radar:

• Radar electromagnetic waves (light) at radio frequencies (50 to 1000 MHz).• Governed by physics of the wave equation (so in some respects it is very similar to seismic methods: V = f!)• Requires a source and receiver (dipole antennae for both)• Source transmits a single pulse:

but can transmit and receive millions of pulses per second!

05x10-9 sA

mpl

itude

timeP

ower

frequency

10 Mhz 100 1000

Page 4: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

• Display is very much like seismic: Amplitude (voltage) versus time on a “trace”. Source-receiver is usually near zero-offset (but can use NMO profiling, CMP gathers)

• High frequency requires high sampling rate, very precise electronics. • Lots more source/receiver obs denser spatial sampling• Higher frequency higher resolution• High attenuation very shallow (< a few 10s of m)

Page 5: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Like seismic, waves are reflected & transmitted at interfaces with differing impedance properties:

layer 1layer 2

E0 E1

E2

• Snell’s law applies. • Amplitude dependence is somewhat different because there is only one type of wave.• Reflection R & Transmission T coefficients are identical to seismic (for 90° angle of incidence):

E1

E0

≡ R =Z2 − Z1

Z2 + Z1

E2

E0

≡ T =2Z1

Z2 + Z1

where Zi is the electromagnetic impedance in layer i.

Page 6: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Recall for seismic: Acoustic Impedance Zi = iVi

For Electromagnetic Impedance,

where: = frequency = dielectric permittivity = relative magnetic permeability = electrical resistivity = 1/ = electrical conductivity r is called the dielectric constant (or “relative permittivity”): a complex variable.

All of these parameters (except frequency ) are physical properties of the medium, so like impedance & velocity in seismic studies, these contain information about the targeted volume!

Z =ωμ

ε r ω( )=

ωμ

ω2εμ + iωμ

ρ

=ωμ

εω + iσ=

1

ε

μ+ i

σ

ωμ

Page 7: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Most modern radar sections are converted from two-way travel-time to depth using an assumed value for velocity…Important to note that

V =c

ε rμ

Page 8: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

Soil and Rock Properties:

Relative Magnetic Permeability ~ 1 for most rocks; 1.05 for hematite 5 for magnetite

Dielectric Constant r (= relative permittivity) (real part): (dry) (wet)

(defined as: )magnetic flux densitymagnetic field intensity

4 30soil

3 30sand

5 12sandstone

7 40clay

water 80 88

(fre

sh)

(brin

e)

4 8limestone

5 15shale

Page 9: Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger 524-548 (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation

For most applications (i.e., near-surface) 1 ≈ 2 ≈ 1; (10-4–10-1) « (106–1010!), and hence

R ≈ε1 − ε2

ε1 + ε2

≈V2 −V1

V2 +V1

(i.e., we are imaging velocity variations corresponding tochanges in dielectric constant!)

For the water table, R ~ 0.1

Recall seismic waves attenuate as where Qis quality factor;

Radar waves attenuate similarly as ; where

Attenuation is extremely high for shale, silt, clay, and briny water (which is why GPR rarely penetrates > 10 m!).

A =A0e−

πfr

QV

I =I 0e−αr

α = 2

σ 2

ε 2ω2+1 −1

⎝ ⎜ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ ⎟≈

σ

2

μ

ε

R =Z2 − Z1

Z2 + Z1

Z =ωμ

εω + iσ≈

1

ε