Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
41I09SW0015 NOHFC#7114 HENRY 010
GEOLOGICAL REPORT
ON THE
BUILDING STONE PROJECT
LOUGHRIN AND HENRY TOWNSHIPS
SUDBURY MINING DIVISION
for
JOHN BRADY
by: NORWIN GEOLOGICAL LTD,
EDWARD SAWITZKY
JUNE 3, 1994
TABLE .OF C
010C
SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION l
2. PROPERTY, DESCRIPTION, LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY l
3. PREVIOUS WORK l
4. GEOLOGY 2
4.1 REGIONAL 2
4.2 LOCAL 2
5. MINERAL DEPOSIT 4
6. PROJECT 5
6.1 RATIONALE 5
6.2 METHODOLOGY 5
6.3 RESULTS 6
7. TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS 7
7.1 OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 7
8. ECONOMIC BENEFITS TO NORTHERN ONTARIO 11
9. RECOMMENDATIONS 11
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
SUMMARY
Geological evaluation of the site, finished products and
engineering tests indicate that:
1) the property contains at least one - a fine-grained pink
granite, and possibly two - a black diabase, large stone deposits
of significant economic; potential.
2) the Iinpalla granite deposit was not evaluated due to poor market
conditions.
3) at least two of the developed faces ate capable of supporting
quarry operations as evidenced by removal of three intact blocks of
+X- 10 tons each.
4) initial industry evaluation based on engineering tests (Trow
Engineering, Sudbury) and appearance ha i.een positive in regards
to the pink granite.
5) production will remain dependent o ri economic and market
condi tions.
6) the project lias been a successful endeavour and added positively
to Ontario's dimension stone resources.
2)
- IN
DIC
ATE
S W
OR
K
AR
EA
MA
CK
ELC
AN
MCCA
RTHY
MA
CLE
NN
AN
FA
LCO
NB
RID
GE
Falc
onbr
idge
FIG
UR
E l
J.
BR
AD
Y
PR
OP
ER
TY
McK
IM
* Sud
bury
PR
OP
ER
TY L
OC
ATI
ON
DIS
TR
ICT
O
F S
UD
BU
RY
1. INTRODUCTION
Heritage Fund Application #7114 by John Brady is a request for
assistance to pre-develop a newly discovered building stone deposit
with a focus on quarry development, block removal, cutting,
polishing, A.S.T.M. testing and industry appraisal.
This report summarizes the field work carried out by the
writer in November, 1993 on the stone projects in Loughrin and
Henry Townships.
2. PROPERTY. DESCRIPTION. LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY
The Loughrin deposit is accessed by Highway 535 and is 16 km.
due north of the town of Hagar, Ontario. Hagar lies 55 km. east of
Sudbury along Highway 17 (Figures l and 2).
The deposit occurs on four (4) contiguous unpatented mining
claims that straddle the north-south boundary line of Loughrin and
Henry townships. Claim numbers are S 1179570 - 1179573 inclusive.
John Brady is the sole proprietor of the property and there
are no contractual obligations or option agreements that apply to
the property.
3- PREVIOUS WORK
There has been no recorded prior work on the claims under
discussion (John Brady, pers. coinm.)
The Loughrin deposit was discovered by Mr.Brady in 1992. A
preliminary assessment program of mapping, stripping, trenching and
small block removal was undertaken at an approximate cost of
160,000.
1179570
(D
o 4OOt ___._ .^.
METRES
80O 1200-. .. J
FIGURE 2 J. BRADY PROPERTY
TRENCHING LOCATIONSITES l, 2 8 3
DISTRICT OF SUDBURY
5l6 3000mN
20
10
mN
90
JUNE. ( 994
page 2
4. GEOLOGY
4.1 REGIONAL
The deposit lies within the Central Gneiss Belt of the
Grenville Province of the Precambrian Shield. The host rocks are
of mesoproterozoic (0.9 to 1.6 Ga.) aye and consist of migmatitic
and gneissic rocks of undetermined protolith (Lumbers, 1973).
These rocks occur as layered biotite gneisses and migmatites which
locally include quar tzof eldspathic gneisses, orthogneisses, and
paragneisses (Lumbers, 1973). Minor massive granite pegmatite and
cataclastic metadiabase of late precambrian age also occur on the
property (Lumbers, 1973). Immediately east of the property lies a
large intrusive body of gabrro\anorthosi.te composition common to
the River Valley area.
4.2 LOCAL
The topography of the area of the property hosting the
potential building stone is relatively flat with local ridge
development of moderate to low relief. Overburden is generally
very shallow, often less than seveial inches to two feet in
thickness. Exposed bedrock, however, is less than about 2% by
area .
The property visit was restricted to outcrops from which face
development and block removal was carried out. Three outcrop areas
were examined.
The pink "granite 1 deposit consists of essentially two large
bedrock exposures (sites A and B, described below). The host rock
is an equigranular, fine to medium grained, biotite - amphibole
quartz monzonite. The rock is moderately to weakly foliated and
weakly gneissic. Minor constituents include magnetite and rare
*r X
j*" s 'y^'
XaO??*^
/7i ff jSTRONGLY ^V^C'*7"
FRACTURED ^\" \ J' Yy~' i
X^^\ 4 FACE liPIT-^^-^-' — \ \ ™ x "'•^ * ^ ~l i
\ ^' ^ C- f - Jx k b x 4.O x s ^ p '
\ , \ 10- x 3.5' x 5'-T"N\ /^ ' r^1 — ̂
MA&StrC t x^ j (
fU/CAIfl ~~"^\ 1 '
GNBSSQSITY \ ^ FACE JII
^ -^^\\ /S' x 4' x 3.5' ll \ \1 \ V
'v SITE A| ^^V. \ ""^ •™i-^— ~^~^, \, i , i^ \ O /B\ ^V '""~ ./""-^^
/^""'' r ^' ji^V. l^^^^^^^^l
, X^JXy^ /^- tnnch
^s*yS ^\s^ FACE I\- -+A
^~~N -^I*S!2l^ ^jf'~~T( 1 1 O,J
^^^#r^
/M4/7C /SSWS
' N,x. I
i\
/^1 — 1'
/XX,
PEGMATOIDCLOTS
^- MAFIC*^ VEINS
If- PEGMATITICVEIN
\1
5oxffAOM'
l
'trench
i
;
r
IO(O10
1 s
o
s-"~*~ —— -N , "^ \ 1
/ \ Ax ^ T
x 1 J^ ' W
/ /-/O' x 4.5' x 4' . . 7 NJ(FrlCF/) L\ L L J j^V" i 1
* S^r it^ J l^l1 1; J
o\ y\ t\ \
^ \\ l
——————————— ̂ f-1^- — ——— -~i j FACE ;;
1 l 12' x 7' x 10-1 1 ——— T
1 1. 1' 1\ 1\ ^ - -. _ ̂ ^y
LEGEND
7 PINK GRANITE
2 DIABASE
SITE C1 —————— ' --r— GNEISSOSITYaa
-— AREA OF STRIPPING
p — FACE EDGE
r-*B7M or M4TEMM. WMOVED
6' x 4.5' x 5-HWKT OF MtTEWM. RQMOVED
L-Dcrm or MATEMM. REMOVED
— 2**-^ FIGURES
J. BRADY PROPERTY2 ^^V-
"'"r— ̂ GEOLOGY2 ^^lce m SITE A a c
W x 7' x 6'nicTDifT /^\er ci inoi IDV Ulb 1 KIU 1 Ur oUUl3UKT
SO lOO ISO FEETill i '
JUNE. 1994
page 3
sulphide. Felsic (generally pegmatoid) and mafic veining\stringers
occur in minor amounts at site A and are more common at site B.
Veins and stringers are often folded and or boudinaged. The colour
of the granite is fairly homogeneous - a pale to moderate pink.
The gneissosity gives the rock a characteristic banded appearance.
Fracturing varies from site to site (discussed below), with
site A being generally more massive than site B. A detailed study
of the fracture pattern would require a more thorough cleaning of
the surface of the outcrops. Sheeting is difficult to determine
because of the lack of exposure in the vertical dimension.
A narrow 3-foot wide diabase dike crosscuts the granite
several meters south of the face #2 (Site A) developed area.
Underlying the deposit area east of the latter pink granite is
a diabase dike ( > 80 foot width) which is medium to coarse
grained, equigranular, non-foliated and variably magnetite-bearing
( <l% to 4-5%). Colour is uniformly greenish-black. Sulphide
content is generally low ( < 0 .5 %). Minor thin ( < 1 \4 inch ) felsic
stringers crosscut the diabase locally and trend parallel to
fractures (Figures 3 and 4).
In the north exposure the bedrock is well-fractured with
tightly spaced fractures (inches to feet).
Fracturing in the southern outcrops is less intense, however,
exposure is poor (details below).
l PINK GRANITE
r- GNEISSOSITY t-- AREA OF STRIPPING
FACE EDGE
r-WOTH Of MMTZMML AGM0VEP
4' x 4 ' x 4.5'—HOtHT OF MMTOML REMOVED
OF MMTEMM. MMOWD
/OO
FIGURE 4
J. BRADY PROPERTY
GEOLOGY SITE B
DISTRICT OF SUDBURY
ISO FEET
JUNE. 19*4
page 4
5. MINERAL DEPOSIT
Description o f m ineralization-type: Stone
Commodity sought is building stone predominately for
dimensional blocks; some usage for fuiniture and ornamental
purposes is possible.
Two varieties of stone were examined d ) a pink granite
b) a Mack diabase
Dimensions:
a) Pink granite (sites A&B)
i) Overall dimension of intermittently exposed pink granite at
site A is about 420 feet (north-south) by 180 feet (east-west).
ii) At site B, approximately 700 feet north along Hwy 535, the
overall dimension of exposed pink granite is about 110 feet by 50
feet.
b) Black diabase (site C)
i) Overall dimension of site where faces T S 2 are developed is 130
feet by 75 feet.
ii) At tlie second site (face III) overall dimension of exposed rock
is 15 feet by 30 feet.
page 5
Reserves
i) Pink Granite (sites A S B)
From the exposures at sites A and B and intermittently
stripped areas adjacent to these sites and assuming a vertical
depth of 50 feet; the potential mineral inventory of this pink
granite would yield a volume of +X- 32 million cubic feet (assuming
a surface area and depth respectively of 800'x 800' x 50').
ii) Black Diabase
From the exposures at site C and intermittently stripped areas
adjacent; to site C and assuming a vertical depth of 50 feet; the
potential mineral inventory of this black diabase would yield a
volume of +V- 4 million cubic feet (assuming a surface area and
depth respectively of 1000'x 80' x 50').
6. PROJECT
6.1 Rationale
The objective of this project was to test a newly discovered
building stone deposit, in accordance with Schedule "A" ( see File
#7114, legal agreement with NOHFC).
6.2 Methodology
a) Site preparation:
John Deer excavaLor was employed to prepare quarry sites which
involved cleaning, removal of waste rock, stone and site
rehabilitation. Also used was a wajax pump for hydraulic stripping
and cleaning.
page 6
b) Face development:
-air track drill used for drilling off face
-closely spaced drill holes, with average 1.5 inch separation
-average length of hole was four feet
-core size used was 2.5 inches
c) Block extraction:
After drilling off face, blocks were displaced from face by
blasting as follows: best results were obtained by using 1/4 stick
in two inside coiners with double b-.l i ne running in each hole.
This shifted the block slightly away from the developed face. The
block was then removed via excavator, boom truck and float.
6.3 Results
a) Site preparation:
Three sites were prepared, two on the pink granite and one on the
black diabase deposits.
b) Face development:
Site A: three developed faces and four blocks removed each H-\- 10
tons
Site B: one developed face and no blocks removed
Site C: two developed faces and f out blocks removed each +V- 10
tons
page 7
c) ASTM testing:
Results from ASTM building stone testing are detailed in the
attached report from Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. (see Appendix
A). Trow considered the stone supplied by John Brady to be
suitable in all respects for building stone purposes.
d) Cutting and polishing: Trow Engineering commented that the samples of stone from the Brady deposit polished well and wa-s
attractive. George Khouri of Khouri Granite Ltd. (Sudbury, Ontario) likewise commented that the rock cuts and polishes well
and is a pleasing and attractive stone for decorative purposes. As per conditions of bulk sampling permit and marketing initiatives
samples of both the pink granite and black diabase were given to the numerous industry representatives (see Appendix B).
In all cases industry comments were very favourable, however,
market conditions limit further exploitation of the resource at
this time.
e) Results of geological mapping is discussed below.
7. TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS
7.1 Observations and Conclusions
Three sites were visited; two sites on the pink granite (sites A
and B) and one on the black "granite 1 (site C) (see Figures 2 and 3).
Pink Granite
This deposit consists of two separate bedrock exposures; site A is accessed by Hwy 535 and lies 50 feet west of the highway.
page 8
Site B also accessed by Hwy 535 lies approximately 300 feet due
west of the highway and about 700 feel jiotth of site A.
a) Site A
At t h i site three separate localities had faces developed and
each area will be discussed separately.
i) At the first location (Face I) the following observations were
made :
- one west and south face were developed
- dimensions of two exposed sides were 9x3 feet, and 9x4 feet
- fractures developed weie:
1) flats (sheeting); one observed
2) vertical; fractures are parallel to the gneissosity
rock is a fine-grained, equigranular, foliated and weakly
gneissic pink granite, weakly magnetic and devoid of sulphides.
Biotite defines the fabric in the rock. Two thin mafic stringers
and one narrow pegmatite vein cross-cut folia and gneissosity.
Weakly oxidized upper surface of face gives rock a slight yellowish
hue .
i i) At the second location (Face TT) the following observations
were made:
- two north arid one west face were developed
- dimensions were 6 x 4.5 feet, 6x4.5 fewt and 10 x 3.5 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) flats (10 dip degrees to the northeast, spacing *s 3 0 inches)
2) fractures parallel to gneissosity (spacing > 10 feet in general)
3) fractures perpendiculctr to diabase dike trend ie. 240 degrees/80
degrees dip (narrow spacing inches to feet)
page 9
4) fractures associated with the intrusion of the diabase dike (140
degrees\ 80 degrees dip), this fracturing decreases in intensity
rapidly away from the contact
- rock is fine-grained to medium grained, massive to gneissic, non-
xenolithic and has minor veins\striagers (mafic and pegmatoid).
iii) At the third locality (Face III) thy following observations
were made:
- one south face was developed
- dimensions were 18 x 4 x 3.5 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) s ubflats (discontinuous, rusty, 15 - 25 degree dips northeast)
2) fractures 40 to 50 degrees\ 75 degree dip
- rock is fine to medium grained, equigranular, foliated and
gneissic, weak to moderately magnetic and pink in colour. Minor
mafic veining is present.
b) Site B
At this location one northerly face was developed. Face
development was parallel to fractured surface and, therefore, face
exposure is poor. Dimensions of exposed sides are 20 K 3 feet and
6x4 feet. Fracturing is fairly strong throughout outcrop and
spacing varies from 0.5 feet to 3 feet wiLh prominent directions
being 260/80-75 dips and 0-20/80 east and west dips. Flats are
irregular in dip (north,east and west). The rock is fine grained,
equigranular, weakly magnetic, gneissic with veining (mafic and
felsic) more prominent than at site A.
page 10
c) Site C
At this location, opposite site A and 70 feet east of Highway
535, in two separate areas face development was attempted.
i) At this locality (Face I) one north face was developed.
- dimensions 10 x 4.5 x 4.5 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) flats (numerous, narrow spacing < 3-4 inches)
2) vertical azimuth 320, spacing inches to 4 feet
- rock is medium grained, equigranular, strongly magnetic, non to
weakly foliated with very low sulphide content. Colour is
uniformly black to dark green.
ii) At this locality (Face III) one north face was developed.
- dimensions were 11 x 6 feet
- fractures developed were:
1) flats (minor)
2) 120 degrees dipping 80 (spacing 2 feet)
200 degrees dipping 80 (spacing l to 3 feet)
- rock is coarse grained, equigranular, non-foliated, and black to
green in colour. Minor white; felsic stringers are parallel to
second fracture set. This section is lower in elevation than the
latter area and contains less fractured rock.
page 11
8. ECONOMIC BENEFITS TO NORTHERN ONTARIO
A total of nine people were employed by the project between
July l L) t. o September 15, 1994 at various times for approximately 40
manweeks of employment. Due to depressed market conditions no
further development/expenditures are warranted at this time.
Nonetheless, the project has confirmed Lhat a very large deposit of
fine-grained pink granite and black diabase which meet both the
ASTM specifications and positive industry response to qualify as an
attractive commercial building stone are potentially available.
With improved economic conditions and available markets these
deposits would be capable of supporting approximately 10 to 15
workers for 8 months of the year in extraction. An additional 6-8
workers could also be employed in cutting, polishing and marketing
efforts.
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Further development in the vicinity of sites A and B to find
more outcrops of pink granite, especially with a natural ridge face
to facilitate block removal.
2) Further site preparation and hydraulic washing in areas adjacent
to sites A and B to expose additional massive sections of pink
granite.
3) Further block removal at site A to test: the depth potential of
this material is warranted. Considering the significant cost of
this proposal, waiting until the market for stone has improved
should be considered.
4) Further development in the vicinity of site C to locate more
massive less fractured black diabase.
5) A diamond drilling program to determine depth of deposit (for
reserve calculations) and density of fracturing.
\./-.. ..^,\ "-r-
APPENDIX A
Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. 1074 Webbwood Drive Sudbury, Ontario P3C 3B7 Telephone: (705) 674-9681
Sudbury Branch Facsimile: (705) 674-8271
SOO575R April 7, 1994
Mr. John Brady 1227 Holland Road Sudbury, Ontario P3A 3R1
Dear Sirs:
BUILDING STONE TEST RESULTSPINK GRANITE AND BLACK TRAP ROCK
SUDBURY, ONTARIO
Further to your request, we have completed ASTM building stone testing in connection
with the above noted rock and, based on our findings, we provide the following comments
and recommendations.
One, 200 mm block specimen of each rock type was delivered to our office in early
February 1994, together with a polished specimen of each rock. We have described the
rock/building stone as a mottled pink granite and black trap rock (probably diabase),
respectively.
We understand that the rock is derived from a potential quarry property north of Hagar,
Ontario.
Both specimens are attractive, well polished and seem very durable. There are no
apparent sulphides or iron minerals that would affect weathering or staining and both rock
types contain a high percentage of quart/ minerals and can be considered granite. Testing
requirements for granite building stone were, therefore, undertaken and the laboratory
results are provided in the attached Table l.
SOO575R 2Trow
Both specimens exceed the ASTM compressive strength requirements; however, the black
granite is considerably stronger overall.
We trust the enclosed results are satisfactory. Should you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact this office.
Yours very truly,TROW CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.
W.G.WGH:gmv21b Encl.
Trow
iliiillliilllilllliiii:
BLACK GRANITE 269.3 220.4 340.2 270.6 213.0 103.4*
(*liairliue fracture noted)
Average UCS - 236.2 MPa
11.613.812.6
Average 12.7 MPa
RED GRANITE 124.8 121.6 117.8 170.4 134.4
Average UCS ^ 134.0 MPa
9.0 9.5 9.3
Average 9.3 MPa
The minimum ASTM UCS for granite is 131.0 MPa. There is no specified minimum modulus of rupture for granite.
APPENDIX B
Khouri Granite - Elizabeth Street, Sudbury
Trow Engineering - 1074 Webbwood Drive, Sudbury
Deak Resources Ltd., - Virginiatown
Tundra Stone Ltd. - Kirkland Lake (saw samples)
Ontario Quarries Ltd., - F. Villano - Londsdale Avenue, Sudbury
Mineral Development Branch - Daniel le Spechrnan
Resident Geologists Office - Sudbury
Marble Trend Ltd. - Toronto
Ciot Ltd. Granite 4 Marble - Toronto
Positano Granite - Elmvale, Ontario
J. Brady - 1227 Holland Rd., Sudbury - has test samples available
John Brady1227 Holland Road ^KBswooisNOHFw/ii^iNw—— — — — ™" gooSudbury, Ontario P3A
September 15, 1994 S6P 2 t
INCENTIVES OFFICE
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Mineral Development Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road, 5th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 685
Attention: Mr. Ed Solonyka Supervisor
Dear Mr. Solonyka:
RA: MOHFC File Mo. 7114
Thank you for your letter of August 5, 1994 requesting clarification of my report and expenses.
The grey or "Impala" granite was not evaluated for three reasons:
1) I was negotiating an option agreement with a third party (Gibson Granite of Val D'Or, P. Q.) to evaluate the Impala deposit; that is to remove and test blocks, separately from my NOHFC program. Although this arrangement never materialized it unduly delayed that portion of the NOHFC project.
2) The grey or Impala granite is the least accessible of the three deposits. The delay (from l above) beyond the "dry" seasons would have necessitated steep cost overruns due to swamp crossings to access the main portion of the deposit.
3) "Poor market conditions" do not refer to themarketing of the individual stone per se. It does refer to the malaise in the stone industry at the height of the global recession. Preliminary marketing of small samples of pink, black and Impala indicated that the pink and black stood the best chance of becoming viable. In other words if the pink or black wasn't viable, it was unlikely that the Impala would create sufficient market interest. These factors coupled with l and 2 above could n- t justify the additional expenses at that time.
Page 2
With regard to the ASTM testing, the additional tests have been completed and are enclosed.
The budget description of 38,000.00 for ASTM testing should have included cutting and polishing (32,033.00) and costs for marketing. I spent approximately 32,100.00 on marketing but did not include these costs in the project. It should be noted that marketing efforts did not stop at the project final submission but ara currently continuing with sample tiles being provided by Khouri and Brady from the left over material. Additional sample tiles have been provided to Italian Marble Co.-Toronto, Manitou Stone-Sudbury and HGH Granite Co.-Hamilton (Re-Appendix B of report).
While 8 whole blocks were extracted some of these were damaged in extraction or were contaminated by surface weathering or impurities. Five of these blocks remain at the site. Two *blocks of pink and l block of black granite were transported to Khouri Granite in Sudbury. (* 10 ton) Parts of these blocks were then cut and polished for sample tiles and for engineering tests (see ASTM report). Fifty to sixty percent of the raw material was determined to be unsuitable for either ASTM tests or as samples due to previously unidentified defects, mainly small fractures created in quarrying.
Finished tile samples were distributed as previously described above and as per appendix B of the report. In addition J. Brady and Khouri Granite have tile samples available for marketing . Khouri Granite also has any remaining "raw" material for future marketing endeavors as required. In fact over the past few months Khouri has cut and polished additional samples (12" x 12" x l" and 12" x 24" x l") (estimated cost *900.00) for marketing l display purposes.
l trust this information will clarify the points raised in your review. Should you have any further questions please advise.
J. Brady
Trow Sudbury Branch
Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. 1074 Webbwood Drive Sudbury, Ontario P3C 387 Telephone: (705) 674-9681 Facsimile: (705) 674-8271
September l, 1994S00575R
Mr. John Brady 1227 Holland Road Sudbury, Ontario P3A 3R1
ATTENTION: Mr. John Bradv
Dear Sirs:
BUILDING STONE TESTS GRANITE SAMPLES SUDBURY, ONTARIO
Further to your request, we conducted additional tests on two specimens retained at our laboratory. Tests include the determination of the bulk specific gravity and absorption on a black and pink granite respectively.
The results are as follows:
RESULTS
Absorption by weight Ve:
Absorption by Volume:
Bulk Specific Gravity:
Pink Black
Pink Black
Pink Black
G.217% 0.0438 7*
0.595 * 0.13896
2.74% S.14%
Both stones exhibited acceptable values with respect to ASTM standards. There are no accepted ASTM limits for abrasion resistance on granite, and as such we did not attempt this test. Both samples would, however, likely pass marble abrasion resistance standards.
We trust the above information is satisfactory and should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Your truly,
TROW CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD.
W.G. Hunt, P.Eng.
WGH:jt60
845000"E wOntario
Natural Northern Development Resources and Mines
IN SERVICE It/It/**
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
PLAN
G-4075TOWNSHIP
LOUGHRIN
tot
SYMBOLSBoundary
Township, Meridian, Baseline.
Road allowance: surveyed... shoreline,..
Lot/Concession; surveyedunsurveyed
Parcel; surveyedunsurveyed
Right-ol-way; road ..... ..,. .......
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION-*
SUDBURY.
Seal* 1:20 000
Contour Interval 10 MttrM
AREAS WITHDRAWN )r(
MRO- M ining Right SRO- Surf ace Rig f M+ S-Mining and:
fOfdwNo. CM*
u36/80 W 89/88 3/11 1 S I
vai/n
u
Df y,l S ' T (M/ N S H l
1107 O tyg O 3 6AU
1 97 9 91--——-48 0-3 4
979.0^ 3 6 /l
- - - 4- - - - - /- ~~ ~
li i i r\ n r\ ~3 c . / -—y/*"i:j^-^^x^- ri11 9 7/SQIT9Q;:p3-Q 119790 M979 Qf ---x-- -- - -^
, M 7957 O
07001-n'9 7900
"i-190044
II97I05C
979G7
T^^1107059
TOWNSHJPAGAR
41I09SW0015 NOHFC*7114 HENRY
Ontario
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
IN S ERVICE 1 2/12/89
PLAN
G-4075TOWNSHIP
LOUGHRIN
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION
SUDBURY
1000Metres
000 O Feet -. H H "-r H. i—
Scale 1:20000
0 1000 2000i Metres
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 GOOD 7000 SOOO 9000 10000 i Feet
Contour Interval 10 Metres
SYMBOLSBoundary
Township, Meridian, Baseline
Road allowance; surveyed . ..
shoreline
Lot/Concession; surveyed
unsurveyed
Parcel; surve/edunsurveyed
Right-of-way; "oad . . . . . .
•ailway . jtility...
Reservation
Cuff. Pit, Pile .
Contour .
Interpolated .
Approximate Depression
Control point (horizontal) .
Flooded land . . ... . .. .
Mine head frame
Pipeline (above t/ound)
Railway; single dack
double rack
abandoned
Road; highway, C3unty, township
access trail, bush .. . . . . . . . . .
Shoreline (origins!)
Transmission line
Wooded area
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface S Mmng Rights Surface Rights Only . Mining RightsOnly
Lease
Surface A Minng Rights
Surface RightsOnly . Mining RightsOnly .
Licence of Occupation
Order-in-Council
Cancelled .. ...
Reservation .. ...
Sand S Gravel . ....
..H
..g
. .T
OC
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
MRO- M ining RightsOnlySRO - Surface Rights Only
M i^ S - Mining and Surface Rights
Description
Sec. 36/80
Order No
W. B9/86
Date
5/11/66
Disposition
MtS
File
MAY 281996
^COH SUDBURY
THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THuSEWISHING TO STAKE MIN- ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SUIT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTR" OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES. FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS UF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.
The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries this index was compiled for administrative purposes only
c:
JANES TOWNSHIP
- .\. ™ \yfwt* if'—- ,^~^r Hi. v^.--. i
9.79IOj(1J ' 17969* ,
1 Vy ' ' \ U '-'-'O t-j^ * *^ f '^ ^-* ' -^i'- x j- nr
l fi 7 9*571 ! t^^^L \t: ^Vi, - \. - "*-^-,-.
07 O 1O 3 2-3 ar 203602-
iW79IB
.1214629 JA,^**'
I2M628M
1197929
RATTER-, TOWNSH
41109SWD015 NOHFCU7114 HENRY
Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern AffairsResources and Mines
Ontario
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
PUN
G-29I3TOWNSHIP
HENRY
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
NORTH BAYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYLAND TITLES l REGISTRY DIVISION
SUDBURY
Scale 1:20 000
1000Metres
1000 2000
1000Feel
1000 2000 )000— : E
4000 sooo 6000 7000
Metres
8000 9000 10000 - L -^SJH __i Feel
Contour Interval 10 Metres
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
MRO- M ining Rights OnlySRO- Surface Rights OnlyM t S - Mining and Surface Rights
SYMBOLS Description Order No. Date Disposition File
BoundaryTownship, Meridian, Baseline.
Road allowance; surveyedshoreline ..
Lot/Concession; surveyed. .
unsurveyed
Parcel, surveyed . ....
unsurveyed
Right-of-way; roadrailwayutility. .....
Reservatiun
Cliff, Pit, Pile . ... . .
Contour . . . .. .Interpolated . ...Approximate . . ...Depression..... .. . .
Control point (horizontal)
Flooded land. . . ...
Mine head frame
Pipeline (above ground)
Railway, single track.... . .double track abandoned.
Road, highway, county, township access ..... trail, bush . ....
Shoreline (original).
Transmission line
Wooded area .. .
DATEOFfSSUr-
MAY 2 8 1998PROVINCIAL RECOm;.*W
OFFICE-SUDBURY
ANNULMENTOF THIS TOWNSHIP INTO LOTS AND CONCESSIONS WAS
PARTIALLY ANNULLED ON JANUARY 2, I964
A.P. I2S7S EXPIRY MAY IT. l*94
A.P.12*78 EXPIRY MAY 17, OI4
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface A Mining Rights Surface Rights Only . . Mining Rights Only . . . . .
LeaseSurface S Mining Rights
Surface Rights Only . . . Mining Rights Only . . . .
Licence of Occupation
Order-in-Council. . . . . . .
Cancelled . . . . . . . . .
Reservation . . . . . . . .
Sand S Gravel. . . . . .
B Q
'.-It INFORMATION THAI APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BtEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOLiRCES AND ACCURACY IS NOTGUARANTEED THOSEWISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SUIT WITH THE FINING "FCORDER. Mi'.iSTRY OF NORTHERN DEVFLOP MEN r AND Ml'JES. FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THF STATUS OF THEi.AM'if SHOWN HEREON
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mai omg Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources
The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries on this index was compiled for administrative purposes only
Ol COl/)
l d)
CO
o
LUx
01ro10
i
