6
GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON AIR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PEACE RIVER AREA, BRITISH COLUMBIA* Dr. A. A. Fitch, Seismograph Service Corporation INTRODUCTION T HE area described is in latitude 56° N, 122°-123° N. It is chosen for study since it is typical of the foothills belt of the Rocky Mountains, and has already received some attention from geologists in the field. Recently, a symposium of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists dealt with future oil provinces of the United States and Canada. l The largest of the little explored provinces dealt with there is a great mass of sediments lying between the Canadian Shield, and the metamorphosed core of the Rocky Moun- tains. Within this area are three important oil deposits. Turner Valley supplies a part of the oil needs of Western Canada, and has the distinction of being the oil field with the most complex structure in North America. Fort Norman, the northernmost of North American oil fields, supplies the radium and silver min- ing camps on Great Bear Lake. The Arhabasca tar sands contain a bigger , serve than any other single deposit-the estimate being 30 billion barrels. Most of the region is at a great distance from markets for petroleum products, so that development has not proceeded very fast. GENERAL GEOLOGY The province falls into two sharply contrasted parts. On the east side beds show a very low dip, down to 3 ft. per mile; it is somewhat obscured by glacial drift. The smaller area, on the west, is the foothill belt. One of the major difficulties in exploration for oil in the foothill belt arises from the fact that the foothills are built of a number of almost horizontal thrust blocks. In many cases the thrust planes, as they approach the surface, break up into a number of smaller thrusts, and the dip steepens, so that no clean-cut thrust plane can be seen at surface. Further, the belt of disturbance which is the expression of the fault in such cases may be scoured out by ice action and by water, become filled with surface debris, and so become further obscured. In evaluating a structure as an oil prospect, closure and stratigraphy must both be considered. But it is also a critical matter to determine whether the probable reservoir rock eX'ists within the thrust block, or if the drill would pass through the upper, barren part of the sequence, then through the thrust plane, and enter a lower blOCk in which stratigraphic and structural conditions have no relation to those at surface. This paper attempts to show that in the foothills area selected, study of the geomorphology from air photographs shows a considerable amount of detailed structure, and permits the drawing of probable boundaries separating three. major thrust blocks. STRUCTURE East of the area shown on the map, almost horizontal beds can be observed along the Peace River. Within the area of the map, three areas of strikingly dif- ferent structure are shown. a) The easternmost block shows strong folding, with a NNW strike. The foremost (easternmost) fold is apparently a diapyre: structure elsewhere is ir- Presented at Semi-Annual Meeting, Tulsa, Oklahoma. October 1941. 156

Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace

GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON AIR PHOTOGRAPHSOF THE PEACE RIVER AREA, BRITISH COLUMBIA*

Dr. A. A. Fitch, Seismograph Service Corporation

INTRODUCTION

T HE area described is in latitude 56° N, 122°-123° N. It is chosen for studysince it is typical of the foothills belt of the Rocky Mountains, and has

already received some attention from geologists in the field.Recently, a symposium of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists

dealt with future oil provinces of the United States and Canada. l The largest ofthe little explored provinces dealt with there is a great mass of sediments lyingbetween the Canadian Shield, and the metamorphosed core of the Rocky Moun­tains. Within this area are three important oil deposits. Turner Valley suppliesa part of the oil needs of Western Canada, and has the distinction of being theoil field with the most complex structure in North America. Fort Norman, thenorthernmost of North American oil fields, supplies the radium and silver min­ing camps on Great Bear Lake. The Arhabasca tar sands contain a bigger ~e- ,serve than any other single deposit-the estimate being 30 billion barrels. Mostof the region is at a great distance from markets for petroleum products, so thatdevelopment has not proceeded very fast.

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The province falls into two sharply contrasted parts. On the east side bedsshow a very low dip, down to 3 ft. per mile; it is somewhat obscured by glacialdrift. The smaller area, on the west, is the foothill belt.

One of the major difficulties in exploration for oil in the foothill belt arisesfrom the fact that the foothills are built of a number of almost horizontal thrustblocks. In many cases the thrust planes, as they approach the surface, break upinto a number of smaller thrusts, and the dip steepens, so that no clean-cutthrust plane can be seen at surface. Further, the belt of disturbance which is theexpression of the fault in such cases may be scoured out by ice action and bywater, become filled with surface debris, and so become further obscured. Inevaluating a structure as an oil prospect, closure and stratigraphy must bothbe considered. But it is also a critical matter to determine whether the probablereservoir rock eX'ists within the thrust block, or if the drill would pass throughthe upper, barren part of the sequence, then through the thrust plane, and entera lower blOCk in which stratigraphic and structural conditions have no relationto those at surface.

This paper attempts to show that in the foothills area selected, study of thegeomorphology from air photographs shows a considerable amount of detailedstructure, and permits the drawing of probable boundaries separating three.major thrust blocks.

STRUCTURE

East of the area shown on the map, almost horizontal beds can be observedalong the Peace River. Within the area of the map, three areas of strikingly dif­ferent structure are shown.

a) The easternmost block shows strong folding, with a NNW strike. Theforemost (easternmost) fold is apparently a diapyre: structure elsewhere is ir-

• Presented at Semi-Annual Meeting, Tulsa, Oklahoma. October 1941.

156

Page 2: Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace

GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON AIR PHOTOGRAPHS-PEACE RIVER AREA 157

regular, some fault-strips parallel to the strike showing a very gentle dip.b) The center block is a broad, gently folded dome, with some complications

at its margin; capped, apparently, by the Bullhead Mountain Sandstone.c) The western block shows sharp, symmetrical folds, striking almost north­

south.

ROJ'al Canadian A ir Force Photograph

FIG. 1

Page 3: Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace

158 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING

STRATIGRAPHY

The sequence of rocks as given by Hume4 and others is

}St. John Black shale

Lower Cretaceous Bullhead Mountain Hard

ConglomeraticSandstone

? Jurassic Pine River Black marineShale

Triassic Schooler Creek Purple Limestone

METHOD

Photographs used were taken by the Royal Canadian Air Force, and wereexamined at the Victoria Museum in Ottawa. A simple mirror stereoscope wasused.

Land-forms fall into two groups:a) Constructional forms such as alluvial flats, beaches, sand dunes and the

like. In a region dominated by constructional forms there is no detailed evidencefor the underlying geological structure, since everything is covered by the recentdeposits. It may be possible to outline recent structural movements in a broadway from the study of these recent deposits.·

b) Destructional forms dominate most mountainous and hilly country.Where the agents of destruction are most active, they etch the surface of theearth, and bring out the structural relations by differential erosion of hard andsoft beds. These relations are very clearly shown by air photos viewed under thestereoscope.

The area studied is a region of dest'\"uctional land-forms. Two forms affordthe principal structural evidence. In the Cretaceous rocks, strong cuestas aredeveloped, with long, gentle slopes in the dip direction, and short steep slopesin the opposite direction. In the Triassic rocks the mountains are smoother, andindividual beds are picked out by erosion, and photograph with the massive bedsin a light tone, and the thin partings in a darker tone.

There is no adequate discussion in the literature of land-forms as seen underthe stereoscope. But the methods of interpretation are an extension of principlesaccepted in geomorphology. An excellent basis for any such interpretation isfound in the photographs and block diagrams by Lobeck.s

!

j

SURVEY CONTROL

In compiling the map, the geomorphological features related to bedding,and the drainage channels, were traced off on Kodatrace under the stereoscope.Photographs of such mountainous country cannot be used to make uncontrolledmosaics. The Topographic Division of the Geological Survey had prepared aprincipal point plot. This w·as reduced to the scale of 1 inch to mile, as were theindividual tracings of detail from the photographs. At this small scale, the dis­crepancies due to varying perspective distortion were small, and the detail wasassembled into a mosaic.

A more complete study of the geometry of the complex folds of such a regionrequires the use of precision instruments. Thus, in the fold shown in the accom­panying photograph (Fig. 1) the frontal fold of the mountains, it is possible thatsome portions of the steep flanks are overturned on both sides, so that at a highstructural level the beds are dipping away from the axis, and at a lower level aredipping towards it: such a fold is a diapyre. Perspective distortion is such that

Page 4: Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace

no!l!

,,' 00'

PEACE RIVER BRITISH COLUMBIAGEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION Of AIR PHOTOGRAPHS

.~

LEGEND'

SCALe: ) INCH. f MILt

-- S.TAtAM

-- .. _nO INTERMITTENT STAt"..

-- SCARP

--- FAULT

=f:= ANTICLINE

=*' == SYNCLINE

I I ~Low DIP - M£OIU...- DIP - HIGH DIP

'..!l!

• v ~ .... : ....:. /'-' \.. ,/,,<elf < .A

l ':"~ I. _' ..,_/ \ : \.. __ .

/....,., .. '--...'" ....... ': ..J " ',. 'q,<-:.l> .. , ",' ",.; h 4,'< "( ...~ .''/~~') \i'" d,;?!t,., /', '.' ""- \~ /./' . .-Y,( ! ~

.', ,~~~.. I ~ ..... '.. '.'.>. ,;;»~\ 0'- ~ J.- . '4'. \mD\\\f ~)r;~>;~,l,\,,;;iJ::':?:;ii; ,; \~ l!!;;:.\~~; i(.\...~~t ,.~ {}.'. '1 \(., \ ~ ,< '( j.J~ l '/j.4' ..' .11>.,:. ',0i::j\'\J ( :f;q;~:oI, "". , ., '."', .. ' .. " ". ..... . .'~ .. , ~) '.. "-'. - ..."' .... , '\A.,., ,r<. \>.:.-..., <','in : ..:;>:".!i.'--f! ~....~-~~.;: '-)"t~)J'~~Ii~~~~J4')~ __ "~- '~~/t;t-,.Jl--.::..,}? '-0\~ I:.. II"'}# ~

, . • • • ~ , (I ,,' \ • --.- • 1 .g. <. 71'1 ., './ ..~", . "/ ~'•• ;', • ',\ ,I " l "<.;:. 'II ••.• /. ",>.. 1 ... "--<.; ./" ,.,. ;.' .. \ I: /. '.. '. ' ,.., " . ", \" "".. ....,... • v ,". • ..\, ,

'",1.', ',. \~)·<·'o·f.\:t i'r\. . ,. ·,.·:t:i"~ ." ··.·l' I .". . <.•...L .....-. rr "-' ~""'" ." ,'i' .. .. "", . . ". ""f .,;or ~n ~ / ", , " L.' .--/ . " '\' .,!,.. , ':, -" " .-; , ~'" ! ., ~".( """'-.; I " " ~;;. ·v< '.... A ''')'-' i~~)¥7V,L ,k, t I ) ~~ If".\1~ f,.''f/ i '0 f ''''''~~/ i J : '.'i'J.\ , A i) "'\ . i, I .'

J ~-\ )"':" } .. u·· \. \': ':"f'''' ',:;:. '\:-;.J i:: :./: \1/- ~ -- ...- ~ "', L .. ~~ "\ \'\. \( ..... ',. '\ (-'l" l'h. /'''1 / "'," ··Z'.," .• '''' .••.,.. . \ '..; \ hl. .,,)"",iY ", /', 0 .. "'~)J '. · ~ l' "" ..'1 i. ,'. -' '. ,'rr! : ' ..

I .-.' , "v ..-" .... ',. : ...' "-. ". r ~ • .' , "" _----.:l . . '.." '.' ,'., \ , '~J ~J .... ....\.. .. :"-'·.·,:1 ';'.'\ ..:: \,/I~\', • i. : ... PeACe , ~,-. ,", .. J:..":,,,.. - .... .. .,. . ~ . . . - ='" .', . ,.•..•, .. "';''';,., .~\ . rj j"'. "~"•.:'! ~\\ (\~ ~ \, l! ~\ ii' ~ 7( ~. '.~~ ./"'. "';/i", . "\ J(~"\ "~_n.... \ -1 ../~..--/ / ::\-,..... \ ..---,;'...... :" ... i :'\ ~~,::::; t\if \..1 (~. ), \~) ,r:" , / .~rrr '~~ :'i:":< "., 1 l~~

';1 i ..' / / n,\.. \ !:." i.: \ \' ' ..i , \' ! " ".\ .. , . ",'." :00 -=- ';/'. _\ .... ~"/~~' ....~. ,I; ===-~ ==- "II~,, .' '. . , , ",' '.. '. . . . . ~ .. ~ ". . ". .,".'. "" ". , '.

" ,,'... '" ..' """ ,,~, , . '~ ..... ~ ..~ ..... ·•.iil,. ..... :-. -., \~ / ,~~~/ I~ \~' f \'= '. _";,,":::':~}\~,0:i';~'> ("'" ~ /1.. "'.'. .. . .'7'e,,"'~"~"" :.. (? .,>, ,":.',..~:::-- : \ I~' I /.::;~ ....,.-.... .'- >","' C..?"A ,,-: (, ;",,,, ,.'.'''if ""' .. "" •i"" Ii'~,\;..<. 'i

\

: , :--, 'I' ;. iJli."( ;, . :. .... I( fif~. '3 1 \\ ,:,-';:p. :-.,.~ ~:~. "? J . ..U " , ~."', ""(.' \ \' : . IT' ( :~~... I --~. '"". , ,,' .' • • '.V"" ./ .'. "0:'. ....\ , / '""...\ ....J ....~y/f':' \\~~~ J/: ·----t'..~~ '.j1n...... \: \ \ :r~/' /'.. ',', -,., \ "'. / ./ ) Y"~). " , . ~. '., , - . , \.' , + •., ", • i8' .,

., "" ." ?--'. , "ll' 'r'" ." ,..... , "'(f;"

'\ ;: ),t '. ,u; ';~)~~~'>';:\:.'\ ,\, )';-1~':\~~~ ....~__ .. --:,. i

' .. ' ". "..." . .. \,. ""~v/'r%" y., ...

--\ ..... "';~" ..~r '~'f1\.\ / t~~( '1:'; \t

..> ":~~~~~\~:-.. >{ (~',\~\;,.':0-' \ ..7~m .~\." ,: "\,: '.' • I/J" • ., \

'~~'t,X (f~~ -.. ~"7'")\\. . i

' ,

..o

\

Page 5: Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace
Page 6: Geological Observations On Air Photographs Of The Peace

GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON AIR PHOTOGRAPHS-PEACE RIVER AREA 159

the dips of nearly vertical beds cannot be determined with a simple stereoscope,and it is necessary to determine the ground co-ordinates of points at differentelevations on the same bed.

SUMMARY

Paper gives some geological observations on air photographs of the PeaceRiver, in an attempt to outline the boundaries of the major thrust blocks, anddetermine the structure of each block. It illustrates a method of interpretation,which, it is suggested, should run concurrently with photogrammetric workwhen an air survey is made of an area in which oil is to be expected.

REFER:E~NCES

1 Future Oil Provinces of the United States and Canada. A Symposium. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol.,1941.

2 Galloway, C. F. J., 1913. Report on the Coal Measures of the Peace River Canyon. Rept.Min. of Mines. British Columbia, 1912.

3 Gwillin, J. c., 1920. Report of Oil Survey in the Peace River District, 1919. Department ofLands, Province of British Columbia.

• Hume, G. S., 1933. Oil and Gas in Western Canada. Econ. Geol. Surv. No.5. Geo!. Surv. ofCanada.

• T.nhprk. A. K., 1939. Journal of Geomorphology.6 McLearn, F. H., 1921. Mesozoic of Upper Peace River, B. C. Geol. Surv. Can., Summary

Report for 1920, pt. B, p. lB.7 McLearn, F. H., 1923. Peace River Coal Area, B. C. Geol. Surv. Can., Summary Report for.

1922, pt. B, p. lB.a McLearn, F. H., 1940. Notes on the Geography and Geology of the Peace River Foothills.

Trans. Royal Soc. of Canada, Sect. IV, p. 63.8 Spieker, E. M., 1922. The Petroleum Geology of a Part of the Western Peace River District,

British Columbia. Bull. A.A.P.G., Vo!. 6, p. 112.

AIR MAP SPECIALCONTACT AND PROJECTION

WATERPROOFED

PAPERSFor LOll Shrinkage and Quick Finishing

THE POSITYPE CORPORATION OF AMERICALAKEWOOD, OHIO