Upload
shivan-biradar
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
1/65
Flow control of bluff bodies using Genetic Algorithms:
rotary oscillation of circular cylinderby
Venkata Kaali Rupesh TelaproluY3101043
Thesis Supervisors:
Prof. Tapan K Sengupta Prof. Kalyanmoy DebDepartment of Aerospace Engineering Department of Mechanical
Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology, KanpurIndia
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
2/65
Introduction
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
3/65
Necessity for flow control
Structural vibrations
Acoustic noise or resonance
Increased unsteadiness
Pressure fluctuation
Enhanced heat and mass transfer
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
4/65
Earlier methodologies of flow control
Simple geometric configurations:
Splitter plate
Use of second cylinder
Inhomogeneous inlet flow
Oscillatory inlet flow
Localized surface excitation by suction and blowing
Vibrating cylinder
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
5/65
Why rotary oscillation ?
Can be employed for bodies with non-circular cross-section.
Promotes drag-crisis at significantly lower Reynolds numbers as
compared to that triggered by surface roughening.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
6/65
Problem definition
The computational simulations for two-dimensional flow past a circularcylinder that is executing rotary oscillation for a range of Reynolds numbers,peak rotation rates and frequency of oscillation, are performed and studied.
Flow control by rotary oscillation for a circular cylinder is governed by threemajor parameters.
Reynolds number,
Maximum rotation rate (1) and
Forcing frequency (Sf)
where, is the translational speed of the cylinderd is the diameter of the cylinder
is the kinematic viscosity
Amax is the dimensional physical peak rotation rate
f is the dimensional forcing frequency
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
7/65
Problem definition (contd) All equations have been solved in non-dimensional form with das the length
and as the velocity scales. A time scale is defined from these two and thepressure is non-dimensionalized by .
For the dynamic problem, a novel genetic algorithm based optimizationtechnique has been used, where solutions of Navier-Stokes equations areobtained using small time-horizons at every step of the optimization process,
called a GA generation. The objective function is evaluated, followed by GAdetermined improvement of decision variables.
where, TH is the time-horizonfor one GA generation.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
8/65
Literature survey S. Taneda (1978)
Flow visualization results for 30 Re 300 have been reported. For Re = 40 and 11.5 < Sf < 27, vortex shedding was completely
eliminated.
A. Okajima et al (1981) Forces acting on a cylinder, in the range 40 Re 160 and
3050 Re 6100, were measure for 0.2 1 1.0 and0.025 Sf 0.15 .
P. T. Tokumaru and P. E. Dimotakis (1991) Carried our experimental studies for Re = 15000, calculated drag based on
wake survey.
Reported drag reduction by more than 80% for Re = 15000. J. R. Filler et al(1991)
Reported alteration of primary Karman vortex shedding by rotationaloscillation of cylinder in Reynolds number range of 250 and 1200, peripheralspeed due to rotational oscillation was between 0.5 and 3% of free streamspeed.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
9/65
Literature survey (contd) X.-Y. Lu and J. Sato (1996)
Finite difference simulations of Navier-Stokes equations, by a fractional stepmethod for Re = 200, 1000 and 3000, 0.1 1 3.0 and 0.5 Sf 4.
S. C. R. Dennis et al(2000) Solved 2-D Navier-Stokes equations using stream function-vorticity
formulation for Re = 500 and 1000 by spectral-finite difference method.
Time-varying grid that becomes less fine with growing shear layer in time isused.
Presence of co-rotating vortex pair and a time variation of drag coefficientthat switches frequency abruptly at a discrete time for Re = 500, 1= 1 andSf= /2, has been reported.
D. Shiels and A. Leonard (2001) 2-D flows for Re = 15000 using high resolution viscous vortex method have
been studied.
Multi-pole vorticity structures revealing bursting phenomenon in boundarylayer, causing large drag reduction during particular cases of rotary oscillationhave been noted.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
10/65
Literature survey (contd) J.-W. He et al(2000)
Gradient-based classical optimization for 200 Re 1000 was performed. Finite element discretization was used and cost function gradient was
evaluated by adjoint equation approach.
30 to 60% drag reduction reported.
B. Protas and A. Styczek (2002)
Rotary control of cylinder wake at Re = 75 and 150 using optimal controlapproach with adjoint equations over a time interval is reported.
Advantage of velocity-vorticity formulation with usage of more localized andcompact vorticity variable was noted.
M. Milano and P. Koumoutsakos (2002) Drag optimization for flow past circular cylinder using two actuation
strategies- belt type and apertures on cylinder, was studied.
R. Mittal and S. Balachander (1995) 2-D flow at Re = 200 simulated using Navier-Stokes solver on staggered grid,
using CD2 method in generalized co-ordinates.
50% drag reduction for low Re, for single parameter combination case.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
11/65
Literature survey (contd)
R. W. Morrison (2004) Discussed the capability of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) to find solutions
for dynamic models.
Quantification of attributes to improve detection and response.
J. Branke (2001)
Surveyed evolutionary approaches available and applied to various benchmarkproblems.
R. K. Ursem et al(2002) Practical problem of greenhouse control is tried using evolutionary
algorithms.
Role of control-horizons from direct online control point of view has beendiscussed.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
12/65
Genetic Algorithms (GA)s
Essential components of GAs
A genetic representation for potential solutions to the problem.
A way to create the initial population of potential solutions.
An objective (evaluation) function that plays the role of the
environment, rating solutions in terms of their fitness.
Genetic operators that alter the composition of children during
reproduction.
Values of various parameters that the genetic algorithm uses
(population size, probabilities of genetic operators etc.)
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
13/65
Working principle of a Genetic Algorithm
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
14/65
Aims of present investigation Study the two dimensional simulation of rotationally oscillating
circular cylinder.
Study the disturbance energy creation/exchange mechanism in an
incompressible flow framework.
Study the effects of design parameters on the drag acting on the
body and explore the possibility of using Genetic Algorithms to
implement the investigated problem physically.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
15/65
Governing Equations
&Numerical Method
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
16/65
Stream Function-Vorticity Formulation
Navier-Stokes equations, in non-dimensional form are given as,
Flow is computed in the transformed orthogonal grid plane, where
Grid is stretched smoothly in the radial direction by the transformation,
where,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
17/65
Navier-Stokes equations in transformed plane
Stream function equation (SFE) is given by,
Vorticity transport equation (VTE) is given by,
Pressure-Poisson equation (PPE) is given by,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
18/65
Boundary and Initial conditions
No-slip boundary condition on the cylinder wall,
Convective boundary condition on radial velocity at outflow,
The initial condition: impulsive start of cylinder in a fluid at rest.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
19/65
Solving procedure
Stream function equation (SFE) and PPE are solved using Bi-CGSTAB
variant of conjugate gradient method.
ILUT pre-conditioners used to make Bi-CGSTAB converge fast.
Vorticity transport equation (VTE) is solved by discretizing diffusionterm by second order central difference scheme and time-derivative by
four-stage Runge-Kutta scheme.
Convection terms of VTE are evaluated using compact schemes.
Neumann boundary conditions on the physical surface and in the far-
stream, required to solve PPE, are given by,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
20/65
Compact schemes
In the present investigation, the OUCS3 scheme is used. In the periodicdirection, to evaluate first derivates, following form is used.
In the non-periodic direction, additional boundary closure schemes for
j = 1 and j = 2 are used, along with the above equation forj = 3 to N-2.
For boundary closure, have beenused. To control aliasing and retain numerical stability an explicit fourthorder dissipation term is added at every point with
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
21/65
Compact schemes compared with CD2 scheme
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
22/65
The region marked in the (kh-t) plane where the numerical groupvelocity matches physical group velocity in solving linear wave
equation within 5% tolerance
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
23/65
GA formulationSFE, VTE and PPE along with boundary conditions, define the system tobe controlled with input as and the output is minimized.
Selection operator: Tournament selection with participation size of two.
Crossover operator: Simulated Binary Crossover (SBX) operator.
Mutation operator: Polynomial mutation operator.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
24/65
GA solution procedure
Randomly generate population for thefirst generation in allowed decisionvariable space.
Evaluate the cost function of themembers for a user-defined time-horizon, measured from an initial time.
Apply GA to the initial population forG number of iterations and the bestsolution is recorded.
Using this solution as the initial solution,another GA generation is started to findbest control strategy for the next time-horizon.
This procedure is continued till the bestcontrol strategy of consecutivegenerations are similar to each other or amaximum number of generations isreached.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
25/65
Results and Discussions
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
26/65
Details of present study
Reynolds numbers range - 500 to 15000.
Orthogonal grid of size 150 X 450 is used.
Outer boundary located at 40 diameter from centre of cylinder.
Surface pressure is obtained from total pressure and drag at any instant iscalculated by,
wherep is surface pressure,ixis viscous tensor on surface of cylinder,
ni is unit normal vector in ith direction
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
27/65
Experimental results of Tokumaru and Dimotakis
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
28/65
Time variation of CD
and CL
for Re = 15000, Sf
= 0.9
(CD)Avg for 1= 1.5, is 0.7878(CD)Avg for 1= 2.0, is 0.4712
(CL)Avg for 1= 1.5, is 0.4101(CL)Avg for 1= 2.0, is 0.6164
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
29/65
Time variation of CDand CL for Re = 500, Sf = /2,
(CD)Avg for 1= 0.25, is 1.3040(CD)Avg for 1= 0.50, is 1.2590
(CL)Avg for 1= 0.25, is 0.08341(CL)Avg for 1= 0.50, is 0.09089
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
30/65
Streamline contours for the initial conditions used by (a)
Dennis et al(2000) and (b) present computation
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
31/65
Time variation of CD and CLfor Re = 1000, Sf = /2,
(CD)Avg for 1= 0.5, is 1.3630(CD)Avg for 1= 1.0, is 0.8917
(CL)Avg for 1= 0.5, is 0.07691(CL)Avg for 1= 1.0, is 0.2219
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
32/65
Vorticity contours for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 0.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
33/65
Vorticity contours for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 1.0
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
34/65
Streamline contours for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 0.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
35/65
Streamline contours for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 1.0
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
36/65
Fourier transform of CDin log-log scale
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
37/65
Fourier transform of CLin log-log scale
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
38/65
Streamline contours for Re = 15000, Sf = 0.9, 1 = 1.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
39/65
Vorticity contours for Re = 15000, Sf = 0.9, 1 = 1.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
40/65
Streamline contours for Re = 15000, Sf = 0.9, 1 = 2.0
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
41/65
Vorticity contours for Re = 15000, Sf = 0.9, 1 = 2.0
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
42/65
Vorticity contours animated, for Re = 15000, Sf = 0.9, 1 = 2.0
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
43/65
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
44/65
Disturbance energy plots for Re = 15000, Sf = 0.9, 1 = 2.0, 0 = 0
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
45/65
Time variation of CD and CLfor Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 1.0, 0 = 0.5
(CD)Avg = 0.9068 (CL)Avg = 1.336
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
46/65
Streamline contours for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 1.0, 0 = 0.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
47/65
Vorticity contours for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 1.0, 0 = 0.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
48/65
Disturbance energy plots for Re = 1000, Sf = /2, 1 = 1.0, 0 = 0.5
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
49/65
Variation of 1of best member with time
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
50/65
Variation of Sf of best member with time
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
51/65
For c = 5; m= 10,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
52/65
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
53/65
For c = 5; m= 60,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
54/65
For c = 5; m= 100,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
55/65
For c = 10; m= 100,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
56/65
For c = 2; m= 100,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
57/65
Variation of 1andSfof best member
with time, for multiple GA iterations
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
58/65
For c = 2; m= 50, with multiple GA iterations,
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
59/65
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
60/65
Conclusions
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
61/65
Time averaged drag and lift coefficients for all computed cases
Case Re (CD)avg (CL)avg
1 500 0.25 /2 1.3040 0.08341
2 500 0.50 /2 1.2590 0.09089
3 1000 0.50 /2 1.3630 0.07691
4 1000 0.50 1.3360 0.1150
5 1000 1.00 /2 0.8917 0.2219
6 15000 1.50 0.9 0.7878 0.4101
7 15000 2.00 0.9 0.4712 0.6164
Time averaged drag coefficient for uncontrolled case for Re = 15000 is 1.3546.For steady rotation coupled with rotary oscillation case,
(CD)avg = 0.9068 and (CL)avg = 1.336.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
62/65
Average drag coefficients for different GA simulations
Case c m (CD)avg
1 2 100 0.3827
2 5 10 0.4092
3 5 60 0.4108
4 5 100 0.4007
5 10 100 0.4735
For the case with multiple GA iterations, (CD)Avg = 0.3543.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
63/65
Summary of results
Computational procedure is calibrated by comparing the results with
experimental results of Tokumaru and Dimotakis, for Re = 15000.
Ability of the numerical method for DNS of bluff body flows by two-
dimensional flow models has been testified.
Rotary oscillation is shown to be equivalent to tripping the wall boundary layer
aerodynamically
A large drag reduction has been achieved, by shear release mechanism on one
side of the cylinder, at comparatively low Reynolds number (Re = 1000).
Efficacy of GA-based optimization strategy, capable of arriving at near-optimal
solutions for a dynamic problem, has been emphasized in the present work.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
64/65
Scope for future work
Investigate whether rotary oscillation brings a phase shift on resultant
force experienced by the cylinder.
Control strategy of steady rotation coupled with rotary oscillation.
Studying the multi-objective framework of the current problem,
using reduction of flow unsteadiness as a second objective.
8/10/2019 genetic algorithm for fluid dynamics
65/65
Thank You