General Overview - ARPE & Interwork Instituteinterwork.sdsu.edu/.../RCR_Bibliograpy_CAPRI13_0620.docx · Web viewCodes of ethics collections | ethics.Iit.Edu. (2013). from Center

Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Bibliography

Linda Tiggs-Taylor, M.B.A., J.D., of California State University, Long Beach developed this bibliography while designing a professional and research integrity distance education course. She has generously granted permission for posting this resource on the CAPRI website. We would like to continue to develop this bibliography by adding current resources that are relevant to specific Professional Science Master’s (PSM) degree programs. Please forward the citations of relevant readings and we will add them to this resource.

General Overview

Allhoff, F., Lin, P., & Steinberg, J. (2011). Ethics of human enhancement: An executive summary.

Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 201-212. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9191-9

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (Vol. 6th). New York:

Oxford University Press.

Bebeau, M. J., (with Pimple, K. D., Mustkavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., Smith, D. H.). (1995). Moral

reasoning in scientific research: Cases for teaching and assessment. University of Indiana:

Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions.

Bird, S. J. (2003). Ethics as a core competency in science and engineering. Science & Engineering Ethics,

9(4), 443-444.

Bird, S. J. (2010). Responsible research: What is expected? Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 693-

696. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9

Bird, S. J., & Housman, D. E. (1997). Conducting, reporting, and funding research. In D. Elliott & J. E.

Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A reader. One Court Street, Lebanon, N. H.: University Press of

New England.

Byrd, W. M., & Clayton, L. A. (2001). Race, medicine, and health care in the united states: A historical

survey. J Natl Med Assoc, 93(3), 11S-34S.

Council on Governmental Relations. (2006). Access to and retention of research data rights and

responsibilities: Council on Governmental Relations.

Crane, A., Gilbert, D. U., Goodpaster, K. E., Miceli, M. P., Moore, G., Reynolds, S. J., . . . Wicks, A. C.

(2011). Comments on beq's twentieth anniversary forum on new directions for business ethics

research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 157-187.

Davis, F. D. (2010). In the belly of the whale: Some thoughts on preserving the integrity of the new

bioethics commission. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(3), 291-297.

Denny, C. C., & Grady, C. (2007). Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations.

Journal of medical ethics, 33(7), pp. 382-385.

DuBois, J. M., Schilling, D. A., Heitman, E., Steneck, N. H., & Kon, A. A. (2010). Instruction in the

responsible conduct of research: An inventory of programs and materials within ctsas. Clin

Transl Sci, 3(3), 109-111.

Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Research ethics: A reader. One Court Street, Lebanon, NH:

University Press of New England.

Ethics CORE Digital Library. (2013). from National Center for Professional and Research Ethics

(NCPRE). http://nationalethicscenter.org/

Gert, B. (1997). Morality and scientific research. In D. Elliott & J. F. Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A

reader (pp. 20-30). One Court Street, Lebanon, NH 03766: University Press of New England.

Gert, B. (2004). Common morality: Decidng what to do. New York: University Press of New England.

Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2010). Research ethics i: Responsible conduct of research (rcr)--historical

and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. J Speech Lang Hear

Res, 54(1), 303-329.

Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics ii: Mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data

management and ownership,. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54(1), 330-345.

Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research ethics iii: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of

interest, and research misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1),

S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)

http://nationalethicscenter.org/

MacDougall, M., & Riley, S. C. (2010). Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of

research practise: What do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ, 10, 83.

Pautler, M., & Brenner, S. (2010). Nanomedicine: Promises and challenges for the future of public health.

Int J Nanomedicine, 5, 803-809.

Pritchard, M., & Holtzapple, M. (1997). Responsible engineering: Gilbane gold revisited. Science and

Engineering Ethics, 3(2), 217-230.

Proctor, R. N. (2006). "Everyone knew but no one had proof": Tobacco industry use of medical history

expertise in us courts, 1990-2002. Tob Control, 15 Suppl 4, iv117-125.

Roland, M.-C. (2007). Who is responsible? EMBO reports, 8(8), 706-711. doi:

doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401035

Shamoo, A. E., & Resnick, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (Second ed.). New York, New

York: Oxford University Press.

Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future

directions. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53-74.

Willison, D. J., Swinton, M., Schwartz, L., Abelson, J., Charles, C., Northrup, D., . . . Thabane, L. (2008).

Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research:

Insights from a public dialogue. BMC Med Ethics, 9, 18.

Misconduct in Scientific Research

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (Vol. 6th). New York:

Oxford University Press.

Bird, S. J. (2010). Responsible Research: What is Expected? Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 693-

696. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9248-9

Consoli, L. (2006). Scientific misconduct and science ethics: a case study based approach. Science and


Dahlberg, J. E., & Davidian, N. M. (2010). Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can

Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review. Science &

Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 713-735. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4

Davis, M., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. (2007). Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct:

Evidence from ORI Case Files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 395-414.

Dresser, R. (1997). Giving Scientists their Due: The Imanishi-Kari Decision. The Hastings Center Report,

27(3), 26.



Hamrell, M. R. (2010). Raising Suspicions with the Food and Drug Administration: Detecting

Misconduct. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 697-704. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9232-4

Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research Ethics III: Publication Practices and Authorship, Conflicts

of Interest, and Research Misconduct. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1),

S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)

Johnson, S. (2009). Welcome to the Bioethics Presidency. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(2), 1-2. doi:

10.1080/15265160802708552

Kakuk, P. (2009). The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences. Science &

Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 545-562. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x

Klein, J. E., & Fleischman, A. R. (2002). The Private Practicing Physician--Investigator. Hastings Center

Report, 32(4), 22-26.

Malek, J. (2010). To Tell or Not to Tell? The Ethical Dilemma of the Would-Be Whistleblower.

Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, 17(3), 115-129. doi:

10.1080/08989621003791929

Parrish, D., & Noonan, B. (2009). Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering

Ethics, 15(2), 161-167.

Powell, K. (2006). So you suspect someone of fraud. What now? Nature medicine, 12(5), 492-492. doi:

10.1038/nm0506-492a

Racker, E. (1997). A View of Misconduct in Research. In D. Elliott & J. E. Stern (Eds.), Research Ethics:

A Reader (pp. 34-42). One Court Street, Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

Shamoo, A. E., & Resnick, D. B. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research (Second ed.). New York, New


Shuchman, M. (2007). Commercializing clinical trials--Risks and benefits of the CRO boom. The New

England Journal of Medicine, 357(14), 1365-1368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078176

Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future

Directions. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53-74.

Tilden, S. J. (2010). Incarceration, Restitution, and Lifetime Debarment: Legal Consequences of

Scientific Misconduct in the Eric Poehlman Case. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 737-741.

doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9228-0

Wilson, K., Schreier, A., Griffin, A., & Resnik, D. (2007). Research Records and the Resolution of

Misconduct Allegations at Research Universities. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality

Assurance, 14(1), 57-71. doi: 10.1080/08989620601126017

Human Subjects

An analysis of factors underlying e-health disparities. (2008). Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;

CQ, 17(4), 417-428.

Beauchamp, T. L. (2011). Informed consent: Its history, meaning, and present challenges. Cambridge

Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(4), 515-523. doi: 10.1017/S0963180111000259

Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions. (2013). Welcome | ethics.Iit.Edu. from

http://ethics.iit.edu/

Chan, S., & Harris, J. (2010). Consequentialism without consequences: Ethics and embryo research.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109990259

Codes of ethics collections | ethics.Iit.Edu. (2013). from Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions

at IIT, http://ethics.iit.edu/research/codes-ethics-collection

Cupp, J., R. L. (2009). Bioethics and the explosive rise of animal law. American Journal of Bioethics,

9(5), 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902847953

Czarkowski, M. (2010). The dilemma of dual use biological research: Polish perspective. Science &


Degeling, C., & Johnson, J. (2009). Underdetermined interests: Scientific 'goods' and animal welfare.

American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 64-66. doi: 10.1080/15265160903234177

Doerflinger, R. M. (2008). The problem of deception in embryonic stem cell research. Cell Proliferation.

Feb2008 Supplement 1,, 41, 65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00492.x

Dolgin, J. L. (2010). The legal development of the informed consent doctrine: Past and present.


Ezekiel, J. E., & Christine, G. (2007). Four paradigms of clinical research and research oversight.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16(1), 82-96.

Fenton, E., & Arras, J. D. (2010). Bioethics and human rights: Curb your enthusiasm. Cambridge

Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 127-133. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109990326

Fiester, A. (2008). Response to open peer commentaries on justifying a presumption of restraint in animal

biotechnology research. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(6), 1-2. doi:

10.1080/15265160802248526

Fox, R. C., & Swazey, J. P. (2010). Guest editorial: Ignoring the social and cultural context of bioethics is

unacceptable. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(3), 278-281. doi:

10.1017/S0963180110000046

Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50, 1-7. doi:

10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1

Gershoff, S. N. (2009). Animal experimentation - a personal view. Nutrition reviews, 67(2), 95-99. doi:

10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00144.x

Hayden, C. (2007). Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Social

Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.), 37(5), 729-758. doi: 10.1177/03063127067078012

Holmes, E. (2010). Character, leadership, and the healthcare professions. Journal of Research

Administration, 41(2), 47-47-54.



S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)

Houde, L., Dumas, C., & Leroux, T. (2003). Animal ethical evaluation: An observational study of

canadian iacucs. Ethics & Behavior, 13(4), 333-350.

Hurst, S. A., & Mauron, A. (2009). Articulating the balance of interests between humans and other

animals. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788678

John, H. (2007). The method in bioethics research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 16(4),

366-367.

Joon-Ho, Y. U., Sara, G., & Stephanie, M. F. (2009). Race-based medicine and justice as recognition:

Exploring the phenomenon of bidil. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(1), 57-67.

Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-122.

Murphy, T. F. (2008). When is an objection to hybrid stem cell research a moral objection? American

Journal of Bioethics, 8(12), 47-49. doi: 10.1080/15265160802568832

Nelson, W., Greene, M. A., & West, A. (2010). Rural healthcare ethics: No longer the forgotten quarter.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(4), 510-517. doi: 10.1017/S096318011000040X

Osborne, N., Payne, D., & Newman, M. (2009). Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3rs.

American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 55-59.

Resnik, D. B., & Kennedy, C. E. (2010). Balancing scientific and community interests in community-

based participatory research. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance, 17(4),

198-210. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095

Rice, M. J. (2011). The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: The result is more

animal based research. Philosophy, Ethics & Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 12-21. doi:

10.1186/1747-5341-6-12

Robert, J. (2009). Toward a better bioethics. Science & Engineering Ethics, 15(3), 283-291. doi:

10.1007/s11948-009-9134-5

Rossi, J. (2009). Nonhuman primate research: The wrong way to understand needs and necessity.


Saucier, D. A., & Cain, M. E. (2006). The foundations of attitudes about animal research. Ethics &

Behavior, 16(2), 117-133. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1602_3

Simm, K. (2011). The concepts of common good and public interest: From plato to biobanking.


Slowther, A. (2009). Ethics case consultation in primary care: Contextual challenges for clinical ethicists.


Solbakk, J. H. (2011). In the ruins of babel: Pitfalls on the way toward a universal language for research

ethics and benefit sharing. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(3), 341-355. doi:

10.1017/S096318011100003X

Spike, J. (2005). Putting the ethics into research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 5(1), 51-53. doi:

10.1080/15265160590927822

Sutrop, M. (2011). Changing ethical frameworks: From individual rights to the common good?


U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1949). Nuremberg code. (Law No. 10, Vol. 2, (pp. 181-

182)). Washington, D. C.: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health.; U. S. Government

Printing Office, Retrieved from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1974). Common rule. Washington, D.C.: United States

Government Printing Office.

US Department Health and Human Services. (2005). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects.

Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/human_subjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.

Visscher, M. B. (1971). Animal welfare act of 1970. Science, 172, 916-917. doi:

10.1126/science.172.3986.916

Whittall, H. (2009). Information on the 3rs in animal research publications is crucial. American Journal of

Bioethics, 9(12), 60-61. doi: 10.1080/15265160903323095

Wilkinson, D. (2009). Trade-offs in suffering and wellbeing: The utilitarian argument for primate stroke

research. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788660

Zoloth, L. (2002). Stem cell research: A target article collection: Part i - jordan's banks, a view from the

first years of human embryonic stem cell research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(1), 3.

Animal Research

Association for Assessment and Accreditation ofLaboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC).

(2013). Aaalac: About aaalac. from http://www.aaalac.org/about/index.cfm

Cupp, J., R. L. (2009). Bioethics and the explosive rise of animal law. American Journal of Bioethics,

9(5), 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902847953

Degeling, C., & Johnson, J. (2009). Underdetermined interests: Scientific 'goods' and animal welfare.


DeGrazia, D. (1999). The ethics of animal research: What are the prospects for agreement? Cambridge

Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(1), 23-34.

Foundation for Biomedical Research. (2008). Fact vs. Myth about the essential need for animals in

medical research. 2013, from

http://www.fbresearch.org/uploadedFiles/FbResearch/Content/Education/Lesson_Plans/Fact

%20vs.%20Myth.pdf

Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50, 1-7. doi:

10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1

Gershoff, S. N. (2009). Animal experimentation - a personal view. Nutrition reviews, 67(2), 95-99. doi:

10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00144.x

Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2010). Research ethics i: Responsible conduct of research (rcr)--historical

and contemporary issues pertaining to human and animal experimentation. J Speech Lang Hear

Res, 54(1), 303-329.

Houde, L., Dumas, C., & Leroux, T. (2003). Animal ethical evaluation: An observational study of

canadian iacucs. Ethics & Behavior, 13(4), 333-350.

Hurst, S. A., & Mauron, A. (2009). Articulating the balance of interests between humans and other

animals. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788678

Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-122.

National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. (2013). Nc3rs -

journal articles. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/document.asp?id=1152

Nuffield council on bioethics. (2013). http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/

Osborne, N., Payne, D., & Newman, M. (2009). Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3rs.

American Journal of Bioethics, 9(12), 55-59.

Radder, H. (Ed.). (2010). The commodification of academic research. Pittsburg PA.: University of

Pittsburg Press.

Resources for Research Ethics Education. (2013). http://research-ethics.net/topics/animal-subjects/

Rice, M. J. (2011). The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: The result is more

animal-based research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 12. doi:

10.1186/1747-5341-6-12

Rossi, J. (2009). Nonhuman primate research: The wrong way to understand needs and necessity.


Saucier, D. A., & Cain, M. E. (2006). The foundations of attitudes about animal research. Ethics &

Behavior, 16(2), 117-133. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1602_3

Tillman, R. (2013). Ethical embodiment and moral reasoning: A challenge to peter singer. Hypatia, 28(1),

18-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01242.x

Whittall, H. (2009). Information on the 3rs in animal research publications is crucial. American Journal of

Bioethics, 9(12), 60-61. doi: 10.1080/15265160903323095

Wilkinson, D. (2009). Trade-offs in suffering and wellbeing: The utilitarian argument for primate stroke

research. American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160902788660

Conflict of Interest

Ancker, J. S., & Flanagin, A. (2007). A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed

journals in different scientific disciplines. Science & Engineering Ethics, 13(2), 147-157. doi:

10.1007/s11948-007-9011-z

Barnes, M., & Florencio, P. S. (2002). Financial conflicts of interest in human subjects research: The

problem of institutional conflicts. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(3), 390.

Beyer, T., & Czernin, J. (2010). Is conflict of interest in our best interest? (Vol. 37, pp. 1063-1068):

Springer Science & Business Media B.V.

Bird, S. J., & Spier, R. E. (2005). The complexity of competing and conflicting interests (Vol. 11, pp.

515-517): Springer Science & Business Media B.V.

Bird, S. J., & Spier, R. E. (2008). A conflict of interest disclosure policy for science and engineering

ethics. Science & Engineering Ethics, 14(2), 149-152. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9073-6

Boyd, E., & Bero, L. (2007). Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An

analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions. Science and Engineering Ethics,

13(4), 415-435. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9041-6

Carroll, K. A., & McGee, G. (2002). Conflict of interest and the american journal of bioethics. American

Journal of Bioethics, 2(3), 1-2. doi: 10.1162/152651602760249950

Gingras, Y., & Gosselin, P.-M. (2008). The emergence and evolution of the expression conflict of

interests in science : A historical overview, 1880-2006. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3),

337-343.

Glaser, B. E., & Bero, L. A. (2005). Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in

research: A systematic review. Science & Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 553-573.

Henry, D., Doran, E., Kerridge, I., Hill, S., McNeill, P. M., & Day, R. (2005). Ties that bind: Multiple

relationships between clinical researchers and the pharmaceutical industry. Archives of Internal

Medicine, 165(21), 2493-2496. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.21.2493

International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2013). International electrical and electronics

engineers (ieee) code of ethics. Retrieved April 23, 2013, from

http:www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html

Katz, D., Caplan, A. L., & Merz, J. F. (2010). All gifts large and small: Toward an understanding of the

ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. American Journal of Bioethics, 10(10), 11-17. doi:

10.1080/15265161.2010.519226

Kerridge, I., Maguire, J., Newby, D., McNeill, P. M., Henry, D., Hill, S., . . . Henderson, K. (2005).

Cooperative partnerships or conflict-of-interest? A national survey of interaction between the

pharmaceutical industry and medical organizations. Internal Medicine Journal, 35(4), 206-210.

doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2004.00799.x

MacDonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2009). Supervisor-student relations: Examining the spectrum of

conflicts of interest in bioscience laboratories. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality

Assurance, 16(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1080/08989620902855033

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2009). Principles of conduct of clinical trials

communication of clinical trial results. from

http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/105/042009_clinical_trial_principles_final.pdf

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2009). Code on interactions with healthcare

professionals. Retrieved November 2011, from http://www.phrma.org/about/principles-

guidelines/code-interactions-healthcare-professionals

Sharp, R. R., Scott, A. L., Landy, D. C., & Kicklighter, L. A. (2008). Who is buying bioethics research?


Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to responsibled conduct of research Retrieved from

http://bioethics.od.nih.gov/researchethics.html

Tillman, R. (2013). Ethical embodiment and moral reasoning: A challenge to peter singer. Hypatia, 28(1),

18-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01242.x

Weatherall, D. (2003). Problems for biomedical research at the academia-industrial interface. Science &


Data Acquisition and Management

Benos, D. J., & Vollmer, S. H. (2010). Generalizing on best practices in image processing: A model for

promoting research integrity. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 669-673. doi:

10.1007/s11948-010-9226-2

Blumenthal, D. M., Campbell, E. G., Gokhale, M., Yucel, R., Clarridge, B., Hilgartner, S., & Holtzman,

N. A. (2006). Data withholding in genetics and the other life sciences: Prevalences and

predictors. Academic Medicine, 81(2), 137-145.

Campbell, E. G., Clarridge, B. R., Gokhale, M., Birenbaum, L., Hilgartner, S., Holtzman, N. A., &

Blumenthal, D. (2002). Data withholding in academic genetics. JAMA: Journal of the American

Medical Association, 287(4), 473.

Council on Governmental Relations. (2006). Access to and retention of research data rights and

responsibilities: Council on Governmental Relations.

Eiseman, E., Bloom, G., Brower, J., Clancy, N., & Olmstead, S. (2003). Case studies of existing tissue

repositories: "Best practices for a biospecimen resource for the genomic and proteomic era".

http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/RAND_REPORT.pdf

Erard, R. E. (2004). Release of test data under the 2002 ethics code and the hipaa privacy rule: A raw deal

or just a half-baked idea? Journal of personality assessment, 82(1), 23-30.



Executive Office of The President Office of Management and Budget USA. (2003). Office of

management and budget guidance for grants and agreements with institutions of higher

education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations,. Executive Office of The President

Office of Management and Budget, United States of America, Retrieved from

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a110/.

Geller, L. (2010). Data management in academic settings: An intellectual property perspective. Science &


Giffels, J. (2010). Sharing data is a shared responsibility. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 801-803.

doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9230-6

Giffels, J., Vollmer, S. H., & Bird, S. J. (2010). Editors' overview: Topics in the responsible management

of research data (Vol. 16, pp. 631-637).

Gunsalus, C. K. (2010). Best practices in communicating best practices. Science & Engineering Ethics,

16(4), 763-767. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9227-1



International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) (Producer). (2012).

I.S.B.E.R. Best practice,. Retrieved from

http://www.isber.org/bp/documents/ISBERBestPractices3rdedition.pdf

Joshi, M., & Krag, S. S. (2010). Issues in data management. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 743-

748. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9223-5

National Institutes of Health. (2003). N.I.H. Data sharing policy,. Retrieved May 1, 2013, from

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/

Pascal, C. B. (2006). Managing data for integrity: Policies and procedures for ensuring the accuracy and

quality of the data in the laboratory. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 23-39.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.



US Food and Drug Administration. (2012). Inspections, compliance enforcement. from

http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/ComplianceProgramManual/ucm255614.htm

US General Services Administration. (2005). Federal acquisition regulation (far),. Retrieved from

http://www.acquisition.gov/far/reissue/FARvol1ForPaperOnly.pdf.

Vaught, J. B., Caboux, E., & Hainaut, P. (2010). International efforts to develop biospecimen best

practices. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 19(4), 912-915. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-

0058

Vaught, J. B., Henderson, M. K., & Compton, C. C. (2012). Biospecimens and biorepositories: From

afterthought to science. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention, 21(2), 253-255. doi:

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-1179

Vollmer, S. H., & Howard, G. (2010). Statistical power, the belmont report, and the ethics of clinical

trials. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 675-691. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9244-0

Mentors/Mentees

Anderson, M., Oju, E., & Falkner, T. R. (2001). Help from faculty: Findings from the acadia institute

graduate education study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 487-503. doi: 10.1007/s11948-

001-0006-x

Association for Women in Science. (2013). from http://www.awis.org/

Bird, S. J. (2001). Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct.

Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 455-468. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1

Bird, S. J., & Sprague, R. L. (2001). Editorial introduction: Mentoring and the responsible conduct of

research: Reflections and future. Science and Engineering Ethics 7, 451-453.

Bridglall, B. L., & Gordon, E. W. (2004). The nurturance of african american scientific talent. The

Journal of African American History, 89(4), pp. 331-347.

Brown, M. C., II, Davis, G. L., & McClendon, S. A. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths,

models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105-118. doi: 10.2307/1493079

Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (2000). Enhancing the postdoctoral experience for

scientists and engineers: A guide for postdoctoral scholars, advisers, institutions, funding

organizations, and disciplinary societies: The National Academies Press.

Committee on Scientific Conduct and Ethics, N. I. H. (2008). A guide to training and mentoring.

Intramural Research Sourcebook: Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved

from http://sourcebook.od.nih.gov/ethic-conduct/Training-Mentoring-10-08.pdf.

Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Institute of Medicine (Ed.).

(1989). The responsible conduct of research in the health sciences. Washington, D.C.: National

Academy Press.

Dean, D. J. (2011). Getting the most out of your mentoring relationships: A handbook for women in stem.

Virginia: University of Richmond.



Emory University School of Medicine. Retrieved May 2013, 2013, from http://med.emory.edu/

Faden, R. R., Klag, M. J., Kass, N. E., & Krag, S. S. (2002). On the importance of research ethics and

mentoring. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), 50-51. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957565

Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2001). Promoting responsible conduct in research through “survival

skills” workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics,

7(4), 563-587. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0014-x

Frankel, M. S., & Bird, S. J. (2003). Introduction the role of scientific societies in promoting research

integrity. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 139-140.

Frugoli, J. A. (2001). Commentary on ‘mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching

responsible research conduct’: It really does take a village. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4),

469-470. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0003-0

Frugoli, J. A., Etgen, A. M., & Kuhar, M. (2010). Developing and communicating responsible data

management policies to trainees and colleagues. Science & Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 753-762.

doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9219-1

Gunsalus, C. K. (2001). How many degrees of separation? Preparation, proximity and professionalism.

Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 505-506. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0007-9


management and ownership. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 54(1), S330-

S345. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0264)

Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring.

Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 33(1), 88.

Johnson, W. B. (2007). Transformational supervision: When supervisors mentor. Professional

Psychology: Research & Practice, 38(3), 259-267. doi: 10.1037/0735.7028.38.3.259

Kaslow, N. J., & Mascaro, N. A. (2007). Mentoring interns and postdoctoral residents in academic health

sciences center. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 14(3), 191-196. doi:

10.1007/s10880-007-9070-y

Kligyte, V., Marcy, R., Sevier, S., Godfrey, E., & Mumford, M. (2008). A qualitative approach to

responsible conduct of research (rcr) training development: Identification of metacognitive

strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 33-39.

Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2008). Everyday ethics in research:

Translating authorship guidelines into practice in the bench sciences. Journal of Higher

Education, 79(1), 88-112.

MacDonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2009). Supervisor-student relations: Examining the spectrum of

conflicts of interest in bioscience laboratories. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality

Assurance, 16(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1080/08989620902855033

MacDougall, M., & Riley, S. C. (2010). Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of

research practise: What do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ, 10, 83.

Marra, R. M., & Pangborn, R. N. (2001). Mentoring in the technical disciplines: Fostering a broader view

of education, career, and culture in and beyond the workplace. New Directions for Teaching and

Learning, 2001(85), 35-42. doi: 10.1002/tl.4

Mertz, N. T. (2004). What's a mentor, anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 541-560.

doi: 10.1177/0013161X04267110

National Institutes of Health Alcohol Drug and Mental Health Administration. (1989). Requirement for

programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional

training programs,” nih guide for grants and contracts. Retrieved from

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf.

National Postdoctoral Association. (2009). N.S.F. Mentoring requirement postdoctoral researcher mentor

plan. from http://www.nationalpostdoc.org/publications/mentoring-plans/223-nsf-mentoring-

requirement; http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf09_29/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2j

National Science Foundation. (2002). Integrative graduate education and research traineeship (igert)

program. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation Retrieved from

http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02145/nsf02145.pdf.

Oglensky, B. D. (2008). The ambivalent dynamics of loyalty in mentorship. Human Relations, 61(3),

419-448.

Robinson, L. R. (2005). Research culture, environment, and infrastructure. American Journal of Physical

Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(12), 980-987. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000187853.79717.41

Roland, M.-C. (2007). Who is responsible? EMBO reports, 8(8), 706-711. doi:

doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401035

Rose, G., Rukstalis, Margaet & Schukit, Marc. (2005). Informal mentoring between faculty and medical

students. Academic Medicine, 80(4), 344-348.



Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to responsibled conduct of research Retrieved from

http://bioethics.od.nih.gov/researchethics.html

Swazey, J. P. (2001). Graduate students and mentors: The need for divine intervention. Science and

Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 483-485. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0005-y

Tsui, L. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in stem fields: A review of the research literature

(Vol. 76, pp. 555-581): Howard University School of Education. 2900 Van Ness Street NW,

Washington, DC 20008.

Weil, V. (2001). Mentoring: Some ethical considerations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4).

Weil, V., & Arzbaecher, R. (2001). Mentoring: Some ethical considerations,. In E. D. Deni Elliott & P.

Judy E. Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A reader (pp. 471-482): Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Wessel, C. B., Tannery, N. H., & Epstein, B. A. (2010). Evaluation of a self-paced learning module to

teach responsible literature searching for research. J Med Libr Assoc, 98(1), 82-85.

Wright, D. E., Titus L, S., & Cornelison B, J. (2008). Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of

research mentoring in closed ori cases. Science & Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 323-336. doi:

10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5

Zigmond, M. J. (2003). Implementing ethics in the professions: Preparing guidelines on scientific

communication for the society for neuroscience. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 191-200.

Collaboration in Scientific Research

Aulakh, P. S., Cavusgil, S. T., & Sarkar, M. B. (1998). Compensation in international licensing

agreements. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2), 409-419.

Baldwin, R. G., & Autin, A. E. (1995). Toward greater understanding of faculty research collaboration.

Review of Higher Education, 19(1), 45-70.

Beach, D. (1996). The responsible conduct of research. Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany,V.C.H.

Publishers Inc.,New York, NY(USA).

Beddoes, K., Jesiek, B. K., & Borrego, M. (2011). Fostering international engineering education research

collaborations: On the need to think beyond the workshop format. Australasian Journal of

Engineering Education, 17(2), 39-54.

Bird, S. J., & Sprague, R. L. (2001). Editorial introduction: Mentoring and the responsible conduct of

research: Reflections and future. Science and Engineering Ethics 7, 451-453.

Bok, D. (1994). The commercialized university,. In N. Bowie (Ed.), University partnerships: An

assessment (pp. 116-122). Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield.

Bok, D. (2004). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education.

Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering

education collaborations. Journal of engineering education [1069-4730], 97(2), 123 -134.

Carrier, M. (2010). Research under pressure: Methodological features of commercialized science. In H.

Radder (Ed.), The commodification of academic research (pp. 158-186). Pittsburg, PA:

Univeristy of Pittsburg Press.

Circular a-21 revised 05/10/04,. (2013). Washington, D.C.: Office of Management and Budget,

Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a021_2004/.

Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational

boundaries. Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.), 35(5), 703-722. doi:

10.1177/0306312705055535



Frankel, M. S., & Bird, S. J. (2003). Introduction the role of scientific societies in promoting research

integrity. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 139-140.

Goran, M. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level.

Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00031-1

Gray, D. O. (2011). Cross-sector research collaboration in the USA: A national innovation system

perspective. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 38(2), 123-133. doi:

10.3152/030234211X12960315267417





S346-S362. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263)

Kleinman, D. L. (2011). The commercialization of academic culture and the future of the university. In H.

Radder (Ed.), The commodfication of academic research (pp. 24). Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of

Pittsburgh Press.

Kligyte, V., Marcy, R., Sevier, S., Godfrey, E., & Mumford, M. (2008). A qualitative approach to

responsible conduct of research (rcr) training development: Identification of metacognitive

strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 33-39.

Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2008). Everyday ethics in research:

Translating authorship guidelines into practice in the bench sciences. Journal of Higher

Education, 79(1), 88-112.

Macrina, F. L. (2007). Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes,

policies, and education. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 865-869. doi:

10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58

Mattessich, P. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work. A review of research literature on factors

influencing successful collaboration. In B.R and Wilder Research Center (Ed.). St Paul, MN:

Wilder Foundation.

Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level,.

Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.

Mills, J., Gill, J., Franzway, S., & Sharp, R. (2009). “Sustaining and enjoying a multidisciplinary,

multidepartment, multicampus research collaboration on women in engineering”. Paper

presented at the ASEE Annual Conference,.

National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Rising above the gathering storm: Revisited: Rapidly approaching

category 5 USA Science and Public Policy, . Washington, D.C.

National Institutes of Health: Office of Technology Transfer. Ott science ideas breakthroughs,. US

Department Health and Human Services Retrieved from

http://www.ott.nih.gov/forms_model_agreements/forms_model_agreements.aspx :

http://www.ott.nih.gov/pdfs/UBMTA_Master.pdf.

National Science Board (NSB). (2010). Science and engineering indicators. Washington, D.C., NSB:

National Science Board.

National Science Foundation. (2009). Survey of state research and development expenditures, srs (nsf 10-

301). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

Radder, H. (Ed.). (2010). The commodification of academic research. Pittsburg PA.: University of

Pittsburg Press.

Raza, M. (2005). Collaborative healthcare research: Some ethical considerations. Science & Engineering

Ethics, 11(2), 177-186.

Robinson, L. R. (2005). Research culture, environment, and infrastructure. American Journal of Physical

Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(12), 980-987. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000187853.79717.41

Ross, L. (2010). The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research

partnership: Points to consider. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 5(1), 19-

32. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19

Schrag, B., Ferrell, G., Weil, V., & Fiedler, T. J. (2003). Barking up the wrong tree? Industry funding of

academic research. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 569-582.

Sterckx, S. (2011). Patenting and licensing of university research: Promoting innovation or undermining

academic values? Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 45-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9168-8

Turpin, T., & FernÃ¡ndez-Esquinas, M. (2011). Introduction to special issue: The policy rationale for

cross-sector research collaboration and contemporary consequences. Science & Public Policy

(SPP), 38(2), 82-86. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12924093660633

Zigmond, M. J. (2003). Implementing ethics in the professions: Preparing guidelines on scientific

communication for the society for neuroscience. Science & Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 191-200.

Authorship and Publication

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2013). General information for authors.

Retrieved May 28, 2013, from

http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/prep/gen_info.xhtml

American Chemical Society. (2012). Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. Retrieved

May 28, 2013, from http://pubs.acs.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1218054468605/ethics.pdf

American Society for Microbiology. (2013). April 10, 2000 - promoting research integrity at the american

society for microbiology. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from

http://www.asm.org/index.php/documents/statements-and-testimony?id=2320

American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013). Obligations of authors. from

http://www.asce.org/Content.aspx?id=29713

American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2013). Ethics module.Pub - 28207.Pdf. Retrieved May 28,

2013, from http://files.asme.org/asmeorg/NewsPublicPolicy/Newsletters/METoday/articles/

28207.pdf

Borenstein, J. (2011). Responsible authorship in engineering fields: An overview of current ethical

challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 355-364.

Charles, L., & Reidenbach, F. (2011). Publication planners and medical writers: A natural alliance.

AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal, 26(1), 8-11.

Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE. (2013). Promoting integrity in research publication. Retrieved

May 28, 2013, from http://publicationethics.org/

Engineers, I. E. a. E. (2013). Ieee - u.S. International traffic in arms regulation (itar). from

http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/compliance/regulatory/itar.html

Farthing, M. M., J. G. (2006). Authors and publication practices. Science & Engineering Ethics, 12(1),

41-52.

Gotzsche, P. C., Kassirer, J. P., Woolley, K. L., Wager, E., Jacobs, A., Gertel, A., & Hamilton, C. (2009).

What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature? PLoS Medicine, 6(2), 122-

125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023

International Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2007). I.E.E.E. (a). Principles of scholarly

publishing,. from http://www.ieee.org/documents/IEEE_Publishing_Principles.pdf

International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (b). (2013). Office of foreign access control (o.F.A.C.)

background,. Retrieved June 13, 2013, from

http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/compliance/regulatory/ofac/background.html

International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (c). U.S. International traffic in arms regulation. from

http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/compliance/regulatory/itar.html

International Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2013). International electrical and electronics

engineers (ieee) code of ethics. Retrieved April 23, 2013, from

http:www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html

Iverson, M., Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (2003). Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they

doing and how well are they doing it? Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 141-158. doi:

10.1007/s11948-003-0002-4

Macrina, F. (2011). Teaching authorship and publication practices in the biomedical and life sciences.

Science & Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 341-354. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9275-1

Macrina, F. L. (1995). Scientific integrity: An introductory text with cases. New York: American Society

of Microbiology, ASM Press.

Macrina, F. L. (2007). Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes,

policies, and education. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 865-869. doi:

10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e58

Meadows, A. J. (1998). Communicating research. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.

National Academy of Sciences. (2013). Information for authors. Procceedings of the national academy of

sciences (USA),. from http://www.pnas.org/site/authors/index.xhtml

Resnik, D. B. (2011). Criteria for authorship in bioethics,. American Journal of Bioethics, 11(10), 17-21.

Resnik, D. B., & Master, Z. (2011). Authorship policies of bioethics journals. Journal of medical ethics,

37(7), 424-428.

Ross, J. S., Gross, C. P., & Krumholz, H. M. (2012). Promoting transparency in pharmaceutical industry-

sponsored research. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 72-80. doi:

10.2105/AJPH.2011.300187

Wager, E., Field, E. A., & Grossman, L. (2003). Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies.

Current medical research and opinion, 19(3), 149-154.

Washburn, J. J. (2008). Encouraging research collaboration through ethical and fair authorship: A model

policy. Ethics & Behavior, 18(1), 44-58. doi: 10.1080/10508420701712917

Documents

General Overview - ARPE & Interwork Instituteinterwork.sdsu.edu/.../RCR_Bibliograpy_CAPRI13_0620.docx · Web viewCodes of ethics collections | ethics.Iit.Edu. (2013). from Center