GE6sigma

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    1/44

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    6sDESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    2/44

    2 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Functional Requirements:Quality 0 DefectsCost $200/OrderDelivery 1 Day

    TRANSMITORDER

    VERIFY

    EXAMPLEFLOWDOWN

    Pilot Results

    Performance

    Results

    Detailed Design

    Production Build &Test

    I want the righttrucks at theright place atthe right time

    QualityDeployment

    CTQs: Quality 0 DefectsCost $1000/OrderDelivery 30 Days

    DELIVER

    Level 1Process

    Design Requirements:Quality Correct TranslationCost $100/OrderDelivery 3 Hrs

    DEVELOPSPECS

    Level 3

    Microprocess

    REVIEW

    BUILDORDER

    CUSTOMERORDER

    APPROVE

    Pilot Build & Test

    Evaluate High-LevelDesign Capability

    Process VariablesSpecification

    Concept Development

    High-Level Design

    DesignRequirements

    DESIGN

    ANALYZ

    E Level 2Process

    Evaluate DetailedDesign Capability

    FunctionalRequirements

    Quality Deployment

    FunctionalAnalysis

    Product/ServiceCTQs

    MEASU

    RE

    Variables Specification:Quality All Spec Fields CompleteCost $50/OrderDelivery 20 Minutes

    FLOW-UP

    OEMORDER

    CustomerNeeds

    Requirements Flowdown

    And Capability Flow-Up

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    3/44

    3 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Activity Network Diagram (AND)/Program Evaluation

    Review Technique (PERT) Chart To Predict CriticalPath/Cycle Time

    Failure Modes And Effects Analysis (FMEA)/Error ModesAnd Effects Analysis (EMEA)/Errorproofing To Predict,Prevent And/Or Mitigate Potential Failures/Errors

    Capacity Planning To Predict Resource Requirements,Waits, Delays, Queues

    Cost/Profit Analysis To Predict Cost/Profit OfProduct/Service

    Simulation Software Predicts Product/ServicePerformance, Includes Variability Of Inputs/CTPs

    Design ScorecardsProvide Focus And Accounting

    Method For Overall Capability Prediction

    Tools To Predict/Improve Design Capability

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    4/444 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Crystal Ball Microsoft Excel Add-On Package ThatPerforms Monte Carlo Simulation

    Useful For Static Simulation Efforts (No Queuing,Bottlenecks)

    Propagates Variability Of Inputs To Predict VariabilityOf Output(s)

    Applications Include:

    Profit/Loss Predictions Net Annual Worth

    Equipment Performance/Life

    Crystal Ball

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    5/445 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    GE Capital Aircraft Leasing* Is Considering An

    Investment In A New Type Of Light Aircraft

    The Team Responsible For TheRecommendation Wishes To Evaluate ThePotential Profitability Of The Aircraft, But

    There Is Uncertainty Around The Inputs

    Crystal Ball Example The Problem

    * Not a real example

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    6/446 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Crystal Ball Example The Approach

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    7/447 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Crystal Ball Example The Solution

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    8/448 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Crystal Ball Menu

    Assign distributions to cells(Generally done with Xs)

    Assign cells to be forecasted(Generally for the Ys)

    Highlight cells withdistributions

    Highlight cells withforecasts

    Copy, Paste, andClear Distributions

    Run Preferences

    (Iterations, Sensitivity, etc.)

    StartStopResetSingle Step

    Forecast Windows -what you see as the result

    Overlay ChartCan add distributionto histogram or compare results

    between forecasts

    Trend ChartWill trend acrossForecasts

    Sensitivity Analysis:good for tolerancing

    Summary Reports

    shows assumptionsand results

    Output results tonew sheet

    HELP !

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    9/449 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Verify Step

    OK

    Design Scorecards Continued Application

    Design

    Capability Data

    Product

    Process

    Information

    Human

    Facility

    Equipment

    Materials

    DataWarehouse

    Simulation

    Calculation

    Delphi

    Benchmarking

    Design ScorecardStep CTQ USL LSL X S DPMO DPU Step

    Sigma Predicted

    Process

    Sigma

    No

    Yes

    Redesign

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    10/44

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    11/4411 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Completing the Performance Scorecard

    General The Performance Scorecard should be completed for the overall services or for each functions CTQs (functional requirements). Its purpose is to

    estimate defects that result from a lack of Design Margin and the stack-up of variation in processes that are required to perform the service. Effects ofqueuing should be included in estimating continuous CTQs such as time and cost. This may require performing a simulation study of the process underdesign.

    (Note: the first four columns constitute the components of theservices CTQs)

    Characteristic List the important characteristics of the function related to customer needs. These are generally developed via the second House of Quality(CTQs deployed to functions to identify functional requirements.

    Measure List the characteristics associated measures or other method of quantification.

    LSL, USL For each continuousrequirement (i.e., cost, time), list the upper and lower specification limits. A requirement may have both an upper and lowerspecification limit or only one specification. Discrete requirements will be evaluated in the Discrete DPU column below.

    Mean,Std. Dev. Estimate the mean and standard deviation of the characteristics measure. This may be based on historical data from similar services,estimated from a simulation of the process (e.g., some form of simulation, computer-based, or a process mock-up), or a Delphi method .

    Short- or Long-Term Indicate if the mean and standard deviation estimate is based on Short- or Long-Term data. The default is Long-Term.

    Discrete DPU Estimate the defects per service unit associated with discrete characteristics (for characteristics where either the discrete is present or not,or where the number of defects per area of opportunity can be assessed). This column may also be employed to estimate the DPU associated withcharacteristics whose distributions are non-normal.

    DPU For continuousdata, this is the percent of area under the long term distribution outside of the specification limits (with sLT = 1.3sST). For discretedata,this is the Discrete DPU.

    Short-Term Sigma (ZST)The short-term sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the CTQs DPU on a one-tailed distribution.

    Total Opportunities This is the number of lines completed on the scorecard.

    Function DPU This is the sum of all DPUs.

    Function DPMO This equals the Function DPU/Total Opportunities x 106.

    Function ZST This equals the short-term Sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the above Function DPMO on a one-tailed distribution.

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    12/4412 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Internal Process Scorecard Loan Application Function

    Process/Step ProcessCTQ/DesignRequirement

    LSL USL Mean Std. Dev. Short orLongTerm

    DPMO # TimesApplied

    DPU ShortTermSigma

    (ZST)

    Discuss Needs UnderstandCustomersLoan Needs

    50,000 1 0.05 3.2

    Describe Options AppropriateOptionsDescribed

    100,000 1 0.1 2.8

    KnowldgbleReps

    10,000 1 0.01 3.8

    Take Application Cycle Time - 30 min 21 min. 3 min. L 1 0.0014 4.5

    CorrectInformationObtained

    7,000 201 0.14 4.0

    General (all steps) Availability ofReps

    5 SecondAnswer

    3 Sec. 1 Sec. L 1 0.023 3.5

    FriendlyDemeanor

    5,000 1 0.005 4.1

    Total Opportunities 25

    Function DPU 0.33

    Function DPMO 13,176

    Function ZST

    3.7

    Notes: 1. 20 Data Elements Requested for Loan Application.

    Design Scorecards For Small Business Loan Service

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    13/44

    13 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Completing the Internal Process Scorecard

    General The Process Scorecard (Internal) is be completed for process steps to be performed by the GECS organization designing/redesigning the service.

    Functions/processes performed by other GECS organizations or external suppliers to the process should be documented on the Supplier Process Scorecard.This helps the team distinguish between internal and external performance issues affecting their design. DMADV encourages the identification of the overallfunctions that are required for the service to be provided (Analyze Step). The team may find it useful to develop a process scorecard for each function beingdesigned (i.e., sales, claims processing, vehicle order processing, etc.)

    Process/Step List the processes or steps associated with each function in this column.

    Process CTQ/Design Requirement List the requirements associated with the process/step. For example, for a claims processing function, the GenerateCheckprocess will have accuracy, timeliness and cost requirements.

    LSL, USL For each continuousrequirement (i.e., cost, time), list the upper and lower specification limits. A requirement may have both an upper and lowerspecification limit or only one specification. Discrete requirements will be evaluated in the DPMO column below.

    Mean,Std. Dev. Estimate the mean and standard deviation of the process/step. This may be based on historical data from similar processes, estimated froma simulation of the process (e.g., some form of s imulation, computer-based, or a process mock-up), or a Delphi method.

    Short- or Long-Term Indicate if the mean and standard deviation estimate is based on Short- or Long-Term data. The default is Long-Term.

    DPMO For discreterequirements, estimate the DPMO. The estimate may be based on historical data, process simulation or the Delphi method.

    # Times Applied If the process is used more than once to complete the function (i.e., in generating a letter, the Save process may be employed more thanonce), list this number.

    DPU For continuousdata, this is the percent of area under the long-term distribution outside of the specification limits multiplied by the number of times theprocess is applied (with sLT = 1.3sST). For discretedata, this is the DPMO times the number of times applied divided by 10

    6.

    Short-Term Sigma (ZST) The short-term sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the process DPO (DPMO x 106) on a one-tailed distribution.

    Total Opportunities This is the total of the Numberof TimesApplied Column.

    Function DPU This is the sum of all DPUs.

    Function DPMO This equals the Function DPU/Total Opportunities x 106.

    Function ZST This equals the short-term Sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the above Function DPMO on a one-tailed distribution.

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    14/44

    14 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Design Scorecards For Small Business Loan Service(continued)Supplier Process Scorecard

    Process/Step/Output ProcessCTQ/DesignRequirement

    LSL USL Mean Std. Dev. Short orLongTerm

    DPMO # TimesApplied DPU ShortTermSigma

    (ZST)

    Local/Long Distance Telephone Company

    Service Availability 1 0.0003 4.9

    Electric Utility

    Service Availability 1 0.0001 5.2

    Credit Service Bureau

    Credit Checks Cycle Time 45 min. 15 min. 10 min. 1 0.0014 4.5CorrectInformationProvided

    60,000 8 0.48 3.1

    Appraisal Service

    Collateral Check Cycle Time 480 min. 460 min. 30 min. 1 0.25 2.2

    CorrectCollateralAssessment

    80,000 6 0.48 2.9

    Express Mail Service

    Delivery Service Cycle Time 24 hrs. 18 hrs. 2 hrs. 3 0.0014 4.5

    CorrectDelivery

    1,000 3 0.003 4.6

    Total Opportunities 24

    Function DPU 1.22

    Function DPMO 50,675

    Function ZST 3.1

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    15/44

    15 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Completing the Supplier Process Scorecard

    General The Supplier Process Scorecard should be completed for process steps by other GECS organizations or external suppliers to the process.

    This will help the team and management clearly distinguish between internal and external performance issues affecting their design. DMADV encouragesthe identification of the overall functions that are required for the service to be provided (Analyze Step). The team may find it useful to develop a processscorecard for each function being designed (i.e., sales, claims processing, vehicle order processing, etc.)

    Process/Step/Output List the processes or steps associated with each function in this column. If the supplier provides some tangible product such asclaims envelopes, cars or trucks (for leasing to GE customers), list the actual part here.

    Process CTQ/Design Requirement List the requirements associated with the process/step/output. For example, for a claims processing function, theGenerate Checkprocess will have accuracy, timeliness and cost requirements.

    LSL, USL For each continuousrequirement (i.e., cost, time), list the upper and lower specification limits. A requirement may have both an upper andlower specification limit or only one specification. Discrete requirements will be evaluated in the DPMO column below.

    Mean,Std. Dev. Estimate the mean and standard deviation of the process/step/output. This may be based on historical data from similar processes, asimulation of the process (e.g., computer-based, or a process mock-up), or a Delphi method.

    Short- or Long-Term Indicate if the mean and standard deviation estimate is based on Short- or Long-Term data. The default is Long-Term.

    DPMO For discreterequirements, estimate the DPMO. The estimate may be based on historical data , process simulation or other method.

    # Times Applied If the process is used more than once to complete the function (i.e., in generating a letter, the Save process may be employed morethan once), list this number.

    DPU For continuousdata, this is the percent of area under the long-term distribution outside of the specification limits multiplied by the number of timesthe process is applied (with sLT = 1.3sST). For discretedata, this is the DPMO times the number of times applied divided by 106.

    Short-Term Sigma (ZST)The short-term sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the process DPO (DPMO x 106) on a one-tailed distribution.

    Total Opportunities This is the total of the Numberof TimesApplied Column.

    Function DPU This is the sum of all DPUs.

    Function DPMO This equals the Function DPU/Total Opportunities x 106.

    Function ZST This equals the short-term Sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the above Function DPMO on a one-tailed distribution.

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    16/44

    16 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Design Scorecards For Small Business Loan Service(continued)

    Software Process Scorecard

    Software Module Opportunities Short or LongTerm

    DPMO Total DPU Short TermSigma (Z

    ST)

    Loan Data Input 20 Data L 100 0.0020 5.2

    Automated Credit Check 6 Data L 100 0.0006 5.2

    Collateral Input 5 Data L 200 0.0010 5.0

    Loan Data Storage 8 R/W L 300 0.0024 4.9

    Package Combination 3 Operations L 100 0.0003 5.2

    Risk Analysis 5 Operations L 100 0.0005 5.2

    Automatic Approval 6 Calcs L 200 0.0012 5.0Committee Review 1 Screen L 600 0.0006 4.7

    Loan Approval/Denial 4 Data L 100 0.0004 5.2

    Loan Package Print 30 Data L 200 0.0060 5.0

    Account Data Entry 10 Data L 300 0.0030 4.9

    Account Setup 40 Data L 100 0.0040 5.2

    Check Print 4 Data L 100 0.0004 5.2

    Total Opportunities 142

    Function DPU 0.0224

    Function DPMO 158

    Function ZST

    5.1

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    17/44

    17 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Completing the Software Scorecard

    General The purpose of this scorecard is to estimate software defects in new software at a given phase in the development

    process based on historical data. This scorecard may be created for each of the services functions, or the entire service.

    Software Module This is a description of the software module required for the service or function to occur.

    Opportunities This column is somewhat flexible. Generally, consider the number of opportunities for the software module tocreate a defect. For example, a print module could lose the entire job, print using the wrong font, send the job to the wrong printer, etc.

    Short- or Long-Term The default is Long-Term.

    DPMO Estimate the DPMO for the module at the given point in development. The estimate may be based on historical data or asimulation of the software or the Delphi method.

    Total DPU For discretedata, this is the DPMO times the number of opportunities divided by 106 (shift = 1.5 for short-term data).

    Short Term Sigma (ZST) The short-term sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the process DPO (DPMO x 106) on a one-tailed

    distribution.

    Total Opportunities This is the total of the Opportunities Column.

    Function DPU This is the sum of all module DPUs.

    Function DPMO This equals the Function DPU/Total Opportunities x 106.

    Function ZST This equals the short-term Sigma (shift = 1.5) corresponding to the above Function DPMO on a one-taileddistribution.

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    18/44

    18 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Design Scorecards For Small Business Loan Service(continued)

    The Top Level Scorecard

    Service Function(Level 1 Process)

    Performance Internal Process Supplier Process Software

    DPU Opps DPU Opps DPU Opps DPU Opps

    Performance Overall 0.0354 4

    Software Overall 0.0224 142

    Loan Application 0.33 25

    Loan Processing 1.22 28

    Loan Approval 0.11 6

    Account Setup 0.354 42

    Telephone Co. 0.0003 1Electric Co. 0.0001 1

    Credit Bureau Service 0.48 9

    Appraisal Service 0.73 7

    Delivery Service 0.0044 6

    Total DPU 0.0354 2.01 1.21 0.0224Total Opportunities 4 101 24 142Short Term Sigma (Z

    ST) 3.9 3.5 1.5 5.1

    Scorecard DPU 3.278Scorecard Opportunities 271Scorecard Z

    ST 3.7

    6

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    19/44

    19 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Design Scorecards

    Completing the Top-Level Scorecard

    General The top-level scorecard estimates defects expected to be found during the implementation of the service. The four

    previous scorecards provide input to this top-level scorecard.

    Service Function (Level 1 Process) List each service function required for the overall service to be provided.

    Performance List the DPU totals and Total Opportunities from these scorecards.

    Internal Process List the DPU totals and Total Opportunities from these scorecards.

    Supplier Process List the DPU totals and Total Opportunities from these scorecards.

    Software List the DPU totals and Total Opportunities from these scorecards.

    Total DPU Total the DPUs for each column

    Total Opportunities Total the Opportunities for each column.

    Short Term Sigma (ZST) Calculate the short-term column sigma (Shift = 1.5) corresponding to the DPO = Total DPU/TotalOpportunities.

    Scorecard DPUThis is the row total of Total DPU.

    Scorecard OpportunitiesThis is the row total of Total Opportunities.

    Scorecard ZST This is the short-term sigma (Shift = 1.5) corresponding to the DPO = Scorecard DPU/Scorecard Opportunities.The results of this calculation provide the team with an estimate of the overall service Sigma. This predicted value can becompared to targets; if there is a gap, then the Process (Internal and Supplier), Software and Performance scorecards areanalyzed to determine the Pareto of improvement opportunities. The team would then redesign weak areas, recalculate the sigmasand iterate the process until the desired overall service sigma level is achieved.

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    20/44

    6

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    21/44

    21 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Show me your scorecard.

    Who is the customer?

    Describe the CTQ(s) and target/specification values. How do you know they are correct?

    What is your capability to measure the CTQ(s)?

    Which sub-processes/components have the most impact on this designs ability to meet the CTQs?

    How was this determined?

    What is your plan to improve the overall predicted ZST?

    What are the main failure modes for this design? How was this determined?

    Which internal processes are the least capable of delivering 6s defect levels? What is your plan to

    address them?

    What percentage of performance CTQs have statistically based flow-downs to the sub-process or

    component levels?

    What is the financial benefit of defect avoidance on this project?

    Which suppliers have the biggest impact on the predicted ZST?

    Questions for Project Teams (examples)

    Understand the numbers and what

    drives them.

    6

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    22/44

    22 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    To Identify And Prioritize Parts Of The Product OrProcess That Need Improvement

    To Improve The Quality, Reliability, And Safety OfProducts And Services

    To Increase Customer Satisfaction

    To Document And Track Actions Taken To Reduce Risk

    Failure Modes And Effects Analysis (FMEA) Purpose

    6

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    23/44

    23 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Product Or Service Design FMEA

    Uncover Problems That May Result In: Safety Hazards

    Malfunctions

    Shortened Product Life Or Decreased Service Satisfaction

    Ask How Can The Product Or Service Fail

    Process FMEA

    Uncover Problems That May Result In:

    Safety Hazards

    Defects In Product Or Service Production Process

    Reduced Process Efficiency

    Ask How Can Materials, Equipment, Methods, And Environment CauseProcess Problems

    Error Modes And Effects Analysis (EMEA)

    Uncover Human Errors That May Result In:

    Safety Hazards

    Defects In Product Or Service

    Decreased Satisfaction

    Ask How Can Occur, Attempt To Prevent Or Mitigate Through Errorproofing

    Types Of FMEA

    6

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    24/44

    24 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Failure/Error Mode: The How An Item Fails Or Error Is Made

    Paper Handler Jams

    Failure/Error Cause: Why The Failure Or Error Occurs Actionable Causes

    Paper Stapled Together

    Paper Misaligned

    Paper Too Thick

    Failure/Error Effect: What Happens To The Process When The Failure/ErrorMode Occurs?

    Copying Job Stops

    Failure/Error Mode Detectability: Can The Failure/Error Be Detected BeforeSomething Bad Occurs?

    Machine Stops

    Front Display Indicates

    Jam In Paper Handler

    FMEA/EMEA Process

    Customer Not Invoiced

    Invoice Lost In Mail

    Sales Data Entered Too Late In Billing Cycle

    Data Base Failure

    Loss Of Revenue

    Customer Upset When Error Detected

    Weekly Reconciliation Of Sales/AccountsReceivable Data

    6C

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    25/44

    25 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    1. Determine The FMEA/EMEA Purpose2. Organize The FMEA/EMEA Effort

    3. Review The Product, Service Or Process

    4. Determine Item Failure Modes And Process Step Error Modes

    5. Determine Effects Of Failure/Error Modes

    6. Determine Causes Of Item Failure Modes/Step Error Modes

    7. Determine Failure Mode/Error Mode/Cause Detectability

    8. Prioritize The Failures/Errors Criticality Analysis And The RPN

    9. Carry Out The FMEA Action Feedback Loop

    10. Validate The FMEA

    Steps For Completing An FMEA/EMEA

    6E l D il d D i C bili

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    26/44

    26 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Calculating Risk Priority Number (RPN)

    Severity Scale

    Occurrence Scale

    Detection Scale

    Bad

    Good

    Injure A Customer Or Employee

    Be Illegal

    Render Product Or Service Unfit For Use

    Cause Extreme Customer Dissatisfaction

    Result In Partial Malfunction

    Cause A Loss Of Performance WhichIs Likely To Result In A Complaint

    Cause Minor Performance Loss

    Cause A Minor Nuisance But Can Be

    Overcome With No Performance Loss

    Be Unnoticed And Have Only MinorEffect On Performance

    Be Unnoticed And Not Affect ThePerformance

    10

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Rating Criteria: A Failure Could

    More Than Once Per Day

    Once Every 3-4 Days

    Once Per Week

    Once Per Month

    Once Every 3 Months

    Once Every 6 Months

    Once Per Year

    Once Every 1-3 Years

    Once Every 3-6 Years

    Once Every 6-100 Years

    10

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Rating Time Period

    30%

    30%

    5%

    1%

    .03%

    1 Per 10,000

    6 Per 100,000

    6 Per Million

    3 Per 10 Million

    2 Per Billion

    Probability

    Defect Caused By Failure Is Not Detectable

    Occasional Units Are Checked For Defect

    Units Are Systematically Sampled And Inspected

    All Units Are Manually Inspected

    Manual Inspection With Mistake-Proofing Modifications

    Process Is Monitored (SPC) And Manually Inspected

    SPC Is Used With An Immediate Reaction To Out OfControl Conditions

    SPC As Above With 100% Inspection Surrounding OutOf Control Conditions

    All Units Are Automatically Inspected

    Defect Is Obvious And Can Be Kept From AffectingThe Customer

    10

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Rating Definition

    RPN = Severity x Occurrence x Detection

    6E l t D t il d D i C bilit

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    27/44

    27 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Potential Failure Modes And Effects Analysis Worksheet

    Requests

    Infos

    Misses

    Required

    Items (L.O.)

    Incomplete

    Application

    Delays

    5 8 7 280

    Process/Product:FMEA Team:

    Black Belt:

    FMEA Date: (Original)(Revised)

    Page:of

    FMEA Process Action Results

    Item/Process

    Step

    PotentialFailure Mode

    PotentialEffect(s) Of

    Failure Severity Potential

    Cause(s) OfFailure

    Occurrence

    Detection

    RPN Recommended

    Action

    ResponsibilityAnd TargetCompletion

    Date

    Total Risk Priority Number Resulting Risk Priority Number

    ActionTaken

    Severity

    Occurrence

    Detection

    RPNCurrent

    Controls

    Small Business LoanAppeal ProcessSBLCC. Zechberg

    5/25/97

    3 5

    Distracted,

    Cant

    Remember

    Create

    Checklist

    JL/6/97

    CollectsWrong

    Info (L.O.)

    ApplicationErrors,

    Delays

    5 10 7 350Office Noise,Telephone

    Connection,

    Customer

    Supplied

    UseHeadphones

    HD/6/97

    Enters On

    Computer

    Application

    Review

    ApplicationReview

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    28/44

    6

    GSO DFSS Green Belt Training

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    29/44

    29 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Power-off interlocks whencopier door is open

    Child-locks on car doors

    Program cash register tocalculate change

    Program phone numbers

    Match TaskTo Abilities

    Stratify/Specialize

    Tasks

    DistinguishTasks

    EliminatePossibility

    Of Error

    DelegateNecessaryDecisions

    Facilitate

    Tasks

    DetectErrors

    MitigateErrors

    Error-proofing

    Prevent

    Errors

    MitigateErrors

    Provide spell checkingfunction in word processor

    Collision avoidance radarin planes

    Auto correct feature inword processor

    Program VCR totape show viaprogram code

    Place similarmaterials inbins, separatebins

    Color-codesimilar parts,wires

    Note:For services, a service recovery action may be planned for errors/defects that

    reach the customer.

    Errorproofing Principles

    Action Results

    ActionTaken

    Severity Occurance Detection

    FMEA PROCESS

    ProcessStep

    PotentialFail Mode

    Potential Effectsof Failure

    SEV.

    FMEA: Identify Problem Areas.

    Errorproofing: Developing Solutions.

    RPN

    GSO DFSS - Green Belt Training

    6Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    30/44

    30 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Fail-Safe Design

    Process Simulation/Validation

    Countdowns

    Verifications Cutoffs, Interlocks

    Alarms

    Automation, Robots

    Work Reorganization

    Job Rotation

    Sensory Multipliers

    Templates, Masks, Checklists

    Training, Communication

    Clarify Multiple Standards Reduce Atmosphere Of Blame

    Procedure Skull And Crossbones

    Involve Workers/Staff InErrorproofing Activities

    Service Recovery

    Errorproofing Strategies

    6Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    31/44

    31 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Evaluate Detailed Design Capability

    Explore Potential Problems In Your Process And IdentifyPotential Improvements Using FMEA/Errorproofing

    1. Review A Detailed Process Flow Chart Or

    Component You Created Previously (pg. 40 - Design)

    2. Identify One Likely Failure

    3. Perform An FMEA Evaluation On This One Item

    4. Identify An Errorproofing Strategy To Reduce The

    RPN Number For This Potential Failure

    20 Minutes

    FMEA/Errorproofing Team Breakout Exercise

    Objective

    Instructions

    Time

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    32/44

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

    6sDESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    33/44

    33 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

    Design Integrated And Complete Product/Service

    Process

    Information

    Human

    Facilities

    Equipment

    Materials

    Capability Predicted

    The Bridge To Process Management

    Process Up And Running Process Controlled

    Owners

    Control Methods

    Measurements

    Improvements

    Business Results

    Customer Satisfied AndDelighted

    D AM D

    The Last Step Of Design Builds The Bridge To

    Operations And Ongoing Improvement

    Current State Desired State

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    34/44

    34 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

    A System Of Activities Whose Purpose IsTo Maintain Process Performance At A

    Level That Satisfies Customers Needs And

    Drives The Ongoing Improvement OfProcess Performance

    Process Control System

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    35/44

    35 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

    Purpose:

    Provide Consistent Level Of Service To Customers

    Provide Direction For Improvement Activities

    Hold The Gains Created By Design And Improvement Activities

    Break Down Barriers Between Groups

    Techniques:

    Standardizing

    Documenting

    Monitoring

    Response Planning (Service Recovery Planning)

    Process Control

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    36/44

    36 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

    Output Measures

    Customer Satisfaction

    CTQs (From Design Scorecards)

    Volumes (Invoices, Throughput)

    Process Measures

    Upstream Monitoring Points

    Candidates: Functional Requirements, Design Requirements,Supplier Performance (From Scorecards)

    Volumes (Throughput, Inventory)

    Input Measures

    Process Variables (CTPs)

    What Should Be Monitored?

    6

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    37/44

    37 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Understand And Manage Variation

    Prepare Control And Verification Plans

    Time

    UCL

    CTQ/CTPMeasure

    LCL

    Process Control Monitoring And Measuring

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    38/44

    38 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    p

    What The Steps In The Process Are

    Who Does These Steps And How

    Where More Detailed Work Instructions Can Be Found

    Where Data Is Taken On The Process And On The Product

    Who Takes The Data

    How (By What Methods) Measurements Are Taken,Recorded, And Analyzed

    When (How Often) Data Is Collected

    Who Takes Action Based On The Data

    Where To Find Troubleshooting Procedures

    What Action To Take In The Case Of Service Failures(Service Recovery)

    A Process Management Chart Is A Flowchart And Matrix WhichHelps You Manage A Process By Summarizing

    StandardizingAnd Documenting

    Monitoring

    Response Planning

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    39/44

    39 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    DeploymentFlowchart

    Key ProcessAnd OutputMeasures

    The Plan For Doing The Work Checking The Work Act: The Response To Special Causes

    Detail On

    Key Tasks

    Monitoring

    Standards

    Method ForRecording

    Data

    Damage

    Control

    ProcedureFor ProcessAdjustment

    Procedure ForSystem

    Improvement

    For EachKey StepIn TheOperation,Show HowThe TaskShould BeDone, OrRefer To ADocumentWhich

    DescribesThe Step.

    Identify In AWord OrPhrase TheMeasures ToBe MonitoredIn EachCritical Step(e.g.,Defects,Timeliness,

    etc.).

    Begin WithThose Vital

    Signs Which

    Are RelatedTo ProblemsYou HaveExperienced.

    For EachMeasure,Describe AnyImportantTarget,NumericLimits, OrTolerancesTo Which AProcessShould

    Conform If ItIs RunningWell.

    TheseStandardsMay ComeFromCustomers,RegulatoryPolicies,(ISO) OrProcessKnowledge

    Expertise.

    For EachMeasure,DescribeHow TheMonitoredData ShouldBe Recorded

    (e.g.,Checklist,Run Chart,Scatter

    Diagram,Pareto, etc.).

    Describe, IfNecessary,Who ShouldRecord TheData AndHow.

    Who ShouldDo WhatWith TheOutput OfTheDefectiveProcess?

    What Should

    Be Done ForThose WhoWere Ill-Served ByTheseDefects?

    WhatAdjustmentsShould BeMade ToAssure ThatThere Will

    Be NoDefects InThe NextIteration?

    What Must BeDone To GainSufficientUnderstandingOf This ProcessSo That TheAssociatesKnow WhatAdjustments AndAccommodationsAre Routinely

    Necessary ToPrevent ARecurrence OfThis Problem?

    Who In TheOrganizationNeeds WhatData In WhatForm InOrder ToMake ASoundDecisionRegardingNew Systems

    Or RemediesAt DeeperLevels In TheOrganization(e.g.,Changes InBasicDesigns OrPolicies)?

    Standardizing AndDocumenting

    Monitoring Response Planning

    The Monitoring Section of this chart should be based primarily on the work ofcreating the Design Scorecards.

    p

    Process Management Chart: Description

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    40/44

    40 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    p

    DeptA

    DeptB

    OutputMeasure

    Standard/Specification

    Method ForSampling/

    Recording Data

    ImmediateControl/Fix

    Process/System Improvement

    Timely(PCI Only)Issuance

    QualityIssuance

    TimeIssuance

    Level OfSatisfaction

    Level OfUnderstanding 100% Of

    Customers WithFull Understanding

    90% OfCustomers In VeryGood AndExcellent (SQMIS)

    POS To FaxTransmittal OnReceipt Within 15Minutes

    100% Of The PCMemos AreAccurate, LegibleAnd CompleteRequiring NoFollow-Up WithIndividual PC Rep.

    100% Of The FaxTransmittals AreInput To BCRISWithin 45 Min. UponReceipt

    Monthly CustomerSurvey Conducted ByMeasurements GroupSQMIS

    PC Samples 25 FaxTransmittals Per Day AndPlots % CompletedWithin Standard By Day

    PC Exception ReportsTrack How Many TimesPer Day Follow-Up IsNecessary With PC Rep.By PCI

    Graph The Number OfExceptions By Day AndTally Reasons By Week

    PCI Samples BCRISOrders Per Day And Plots% Completed WithinStandard By Day

    Train Individual Rep./Staff

    Discuss/ReviewSuggestions At ScheduledPC Site Meetings

    Assign Individual To HandleAll Fax Transmittals

    Reviewed Monthly By Reg. SPComm. And NPA BOM

    Reviewed Weekly By NPASP Comm.

    Reviewed Monthly ByReg. SP Comm, And NPABOM.

    Measures Reviewed Weekly ByNPA SP Comm.

    Measures Reviewed Monthly ByReg. SP Comm, And NPA BOM.

    Reviewed Weekly By NPASP Comm.

    Reviewed Monthly ByReg. SP Comm, And NPABOM.

    Reviewed Monthly By Reg. SPComm. And NPA BOM

    Monthly CustomerSurvey Conducted ByMeasurements Group

    Process:Purpose:

    Process Owner:

    Check The Process

    Date:Rev.:

    Act/Fix Problem

    CustomerRequestsService

    CustomerRequestsService

    IssueBCRISOrder

    IssueBCRISOrder

    IssuePC

    Memo

    DeptC

    Input/Process

    Measures

    Process Management Chart: Example

    6Prepare Control And Verification Plans

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    41/44

    41 19990036-1 DFSS-Design

    6 s

    GE Confidential

    Table Team Exercise

    Determine How To Control The Quality And CostOf A New Process.

    For 1-3 Key CTPs Identified Earlier Today, (pg. 21 - Design),Develop The Elements Of The Process Control System

    -How To Standardize/Document

    -How To Monitor

    -How To Respond

    20 Minutes

    Objective

    Instructions

    Time

    6 sDesign Summary

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    42/44

    42 19990036-1 DFSS-DesignGE Confidential

    Road Map

    Reviews:Tollgate 4Design Phase

    Evaluate Detailed

    Design Capability Predict/Improve Design

    Capability Capability Analyses Failure Modes And Effects

    Analysis Simulate Process Performance

    Hold Design Reviews(Incl. Risk Assessment)

    Capability, Produceability Compliance, Hardware, Software Integrate Design And Freeze

    Develop Detailed Design Plan Detailed Design Effort

    Design Elements

    Develop Detailed Processes Develop Alternatives Choose Best Develop Details Procurement

    Determine And Measure CTPs Specification Limits

    Control Points, Measurements

    Prepare Control/

    Verification Plan Develop Control Strategy

    Control Charts/Measure Process Owners/ParticipantsDocumentation

    Test And Validation Planning Pilot Test Plan Developed/

    Approved

    Hold PilotProcess Release

    Readiness Review

    Tools: Process Map IT Logical/Physical Design Facilities Design Job Design Specifications QFD Benchmarking

    Control Plan Process Management Charts Standards/Procedures Pilot/Test Plan

    AND/PERT FMEA/EMEA Simulation Software Tolerance Analysis Design Scorecards

    VerifyAnalyzeMeasureDefine Design

    Main Deliverables - Detailed DesignControl Plan

    6 sDesign Summary

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    43/44

    43 19990036-1 DFSS-DesignGE Confidential

    Freeze Your Design Specifications

    Use A Phased Approach For Changes

    Dont Design To A Moving Target

    Simplify

    Minimize Handoffs

    Standardize Process Steps (Technology Can Help)

    Only Plan Controllable Process Steps

    Only Consider Outsourcing If It Can Be Controlled

    Simulation Tools Are Helpful And Timesaving

    But Only As Good As You Make Them

    Start Thinking Seriously About Implementation

    Roles, Tasks, Change Management

    Lessons Learned

    6 sDesign: Tollgate 4

    GSO DFSS - Green Belt Training

  • 8/2/2019 GE6sigma

    44/44

    44 19990036-1 DFSS-DesignGE Confidential

    Develop Detailed Process Design- Detailed Process Map Finalized - Process Map

    - Functional Review and Approval- Define CTP Measurements & Targets - In-Process Metrics- Implement Collection Routines established

    Simulate Process & Understand Capability of New Process - Simulation Validation- If redesign required, implement fixes

    Develop Control Strategy - Control Plan- Control Plan Established- Control Charts Developed

    Develop Test Plan - Test Plan- Test requirements complete- Develop Schedule for Reviewing Issues Log of Test Results

    with Customer

    Determine Risk at This Point and Communicate Pilot Readiness Review

    Master Black Belt

    Process Manager

    Business Champion

    Master Black Belt

    GSO GE Business

    Functional Owner(s)

    Business Champion

    Tollgate 4 Objective: Approved Test Plan & Timeline