Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    1/25

    Farshad Asgari

    93134020

     

    :SupervisorDr.Khamehchi

    Transient Gas low in Unconventional

    Gas Reservoirs

    1/21

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    2/25

    Introduction 

    2

    Unlike flow intraditional reservoirs, nanoscale observationsand field data analysis tell us that gas flow in such extremely

    low-permeability formations is complicated by flow

    condition and many co-existing processes, such as:

    1. severe heterogeneity on any scales

    2. Klinkenberg effect or known as Knudsen diffusion

    3. non-Darcy flow behavior

    4. adsorption/desorption5. strong interactions between fluid (gas and water)

    molecules and solid materials within tiny pores 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    3/25

      low Model 

    3

    A multiphase system of gas and water in a unconventionalreservoir is assumed to be similar to the black oil model,

    composed of two phases: gaseous and aqueous phases.

    the gas and water components are assumed to be present

    only in their associated phases, and adsorbed gas is within the

    solid phase of rock.

    Each fluid phase flows in response to pressure, gravitational,

    and capillary forces according to the multiphase extension of

    Darcy law or several non-Darcy laws

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    4/25

      low Model

    4

    In an isothermal system containing two mass components, subjectto flow and sorption, two mass-balance equations are needed to

    fully describe the system (β = g for gas and β = w for water).

    where  " is the density ; v is the volumetric velocity vector ; S is

    the saturation;  is the effective porosity of formation; t is time;

    m is the adsorption or desorption term for gas component (k=g

    only) per unit volume of formation; and q is the sink/source termof phase (component) per unit volume of formation.

     

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    5/25

      low Model

    5

    The flow velocity will be evaluated:

    1. using the Darcy’s law with Klinkenberg effects (for gas

    flow)

    2.Using the nonlinear flow models to describe non-Darcyflow behavior

    3. flow condition where flow may not occur until the

    pressure or potential gradient reaches a certain threshold

    value 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    6/25

      low Model

    6

    Darcy’s Flow: When the Darcy’s law is applicable, thevelocity, v , is defined as:

     

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    7/25

      low Model

    7

    Non-Darcy’s  Flow: In addition to multiphase Darcy flow,non-Darcy flow may also occur between and among the

    continua in tight or shale gas reservoirs. The flow velocity, v ,

    for non-Darcy flow of each fluid may be described using the

    multiphase extension of the Forchheimer equation

    where  is the effective non-Darcy flow coefficient with a

    unit m-1 for fluid " under multiphase flow conditions. 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    8/25

      low Model

    8

    Flow with Threshold Pressure Gradient: Thephenomenon of flow with threshold-pressure-gradient

    concept has been observed in laboratory and is commonly

    used to describe nonlinear flow behavior in low permeability

    reservoirs.Using the effective potential gradient, the flow ofgas or liquid in a low-permeability reservoir is described by,

     

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    9/25

      low Model

    9

    the effective potential gradient whose scalar component in the xdirection (the flow direction) is defined as,

    where G is the threshold (or minimum) potential gradient for thefluid to become mobile.

     

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    10/25

      low Model

    10

    Adsorption: Natural gas can be present as a free gas phaseor as adsorbed gas on solids in pores. In shales, methane

    molecules are adsorbed mainly to the carbon-rich

    components, i.e. kerogen .

     As observed, adsorbed mass of gas can provide significant

    fraction of gas reserves and recovery. As the pressure

    decreases with gas production from reservoirs, more

    adsorbed gas is released from solid to free gas phase.

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    11/25

      low Model

    11

    In model, the mass of adsorbed gas in formation volume V is described

    where is kerogen density, is gas density at standard condition, is

    the average volume relative of kerogen in bulk volume,   is theadsorbed gas mass in bulk formation volume V. f(P) is the adsorption

    isotherm function.

    where, is the Langmuir volume (the maximum adsorption capacity at

    a given temperature), and is the Langmuir pressure(the pressure at

    which the adsorbed gas content is equal to

    2 ). 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    12/25

      low Model

    12

    Klinkenberg Effect: In low-permeability formation or underlow pressure condition, the Klinkenberg effect may be toosignificant to be ignored when modeling gas flow in reservoirs,

     because of small size pores and low permeability associated.Undersuch flow conditions, absolute permeability for the gas phase is

    written as a function of gas pressure as,

    Where ∞  is constant, absolute gas-phase permeability under

    very large gas-phase pressure (where the Klinkenberg effect isminimized); and b is the Klinkenberg factor, depending on thepore structure of the medium and formation temperature.

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    13/25

    Numerical Model

    13

    In general, the flow model is solved using a numericalapproach. This work follows the methodology for reservoir

    simulation, i.e., using numerical approaches to simulate gas

    and water flow, following three steps:

    1.  spatial discretization of mass conservation equations;

    2. time discretization;

    3. Iterative approaches to solve the resulting nonlinear,

    discrete algebraic equations. 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    14/25

    Numerical Model

    14

    Discrete Equations: The component mass-balanceEquations are discretized in space using a control-volume or

    integrated finite difference concept. Time discretization is

    carried out using a backward, first-order, fully implicit finite-

    difference scheme. 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    15/25

    Numerical Model

    15

    The discrete nonlinear equations for components of gas andwater at gridblock or node i can be written in a general

    form: 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    16/25

    Numerical Model

    16

    where superscript k serves also as an equation index for gasand water components with k = 1 (gas) and 2 (water);superscript n denotes the previous time level, with n+1 thecurrent time level to be solved; subscript i refers to the index

    of gridblock or node i, with N being the total number ofnodes in the grid; ∆t is time step size; Vi is the volume ofnode i; i contains the set of direct neighboring nodes (j) ofnode i;, , , and  are the accumulation andreaction (absorption or desorption) terms, respectively, at

    node i; the component mass ―flow‖ term between nodes i and j, and sink/source term at node i for component k,respectively, defined below.

     

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    17/25

    Numerical Model

    17

    mass fluxes by advective processes and are described by adiscrete version of Darcy’s law: 

    mobility term:

    Transmissivity:

    The flow potential term: 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    18/25

    Numerical Model

    18

    Handling fractured media: to implement fractured modelingapproaches, special attention is needed to calculate fracture-matrix mass transfer. the flow between fractures and matrix is stillevaluated using slide 17; however, the transmissibility for thefracture-matrix flow is given by:

    where Afm is the total interface area between fractures and matrixof element i and j (one of them is a fracture and the other is a

    matrix blocks); is matrix absolute permeability; and is acharacteristic distance or equivalent length for flow betweenfracture and matrix blocks 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    19/25

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    20/25

    Numerical Model

    20

    Handling non-Darcy flow: Under the non-Darcy flowcondition, the flow term ( ) along the connection (i,

     j), between elements i and j, is numerically defined as: 

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    21/25

    Numerical Solution

    21

    we use the fully implicit scheme to solve the discretenonlinear Eq slide 15 with a Newton iteration method. Let

    us write the discrete nonlinear equation, Eq slide 15, in a

    residual form as:

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    22/25

    Numerical Solution

    22

    Eq slide 21 defines a set of 2&N coupled nonlinear equationsthat need to be solved for every balance equation of masscomponents, respectively.

    In general, two primary variables per node are needed to use

    the Newton iteration for the associated two equations pernode.

     The primary variables selected are gas pressure and gassaturation. The rest of the dependent variables, such asrelative permeability, capillary pressures, viscosity anddensities, adsorption term, as well as nonselected pressures,and saturation, — are treated as secondary variables, whichare calculated from selected primary variables.

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    23/25

    Numerical Solution

    23

    In terms of the primary variables, the residual equation, Eqslide 21, at a node i is regarded as a function of the primaryvariables at not only node i, but also at all its directneighboring nodes j. The Newton iteration scheme gives rise

    to

    where Xm is the primary variable m with m = 1 and 2,respectively, at node i and all its direct neighbors; p is theiteration level; and i =1, 2, 3, …, N. The primary variablesneed to be updated after each iteration.

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    24/25

    Numerical Solution

    24

    The Newton iteration process continues until the residuals,+1 or changes in the primary variables ,+1 over

    iteration are reduced below preset convergence tolerances.

    At each Newton iteration, Eq slide 23 represents a system of

    (2&N) linearized algebraic equations with sparse matrices,

    which are solved by a linear equation solver.

  • 8/20/2019 Gas Flow in Gas Reservoirs

    25/25

    References

    25

    Bybee, K., Horizontal wells in tight gas sands: risk management to maximizesuccess, JPT, 61-63, October, 2008.

    Denney, D., Rock type-understanding productivity in tight gas sands, JPT, 53-56, October, 2008.

    Forsyth, P. A., Y. S. Wu and K. Pruess, Robust Numerical Methods forSaturated-unsaturated Flow with Dry Initial Conditions in Heterogeneous

    Media. Advance in Water Resources 18, p. 25-38, 1995. Klinkenberg, L.J., The Permeability of Porous Media to Liquids and Gases, in

    API Drilling and Production Practice, 200 – 213, 1941.

    Langmuir Irving, The constitution and fundamental properties of solids andliquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society 38 (11): 2221 – 2295,1916.

    Wu, Y.S. and P. Fackahroenphol, ―A Unified Mathematical Model forUnconventional Reservoir Simulation,‖ SPE-142884, presented at the SPEEUROPEC Conference, to be held from 23-26 May 2011 in Vienna, Austria,2011.