Upload
john-a-cieraszynski-mba
View
12
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DriveDoxUnit 6 Final project GA UX Circuit - John
Cieraszynski
DriveDox Problem Statement
In our modern society, the number of tasks people are required to perform have increased dramatically. As such, people try to use several methods to remind themselves of “what” to “do” and “when”.
When it comes to the personal vehicles people use everyday, there are critical tasks that must be performed in a timely manner to make sure they have the proper insurance, registration and maintenance.
If they fail to maintain their vehicle, people can experience consequences if the form of expensive fines or unnecessary repairs.
DriveDox Solution
In order to avoid these consequences, DriveDox was designed as a mobile app to assist people in making sure their car is "legal" and running properly.
In order to be competitive, DriveDox is focusing on the recording and sending reminders for only three areas (below)
• Insurance• Registration• Preventative maintenance
Initial Research & Documentation
Given this focus, user research was conducted asking people how they maintained their vehicles.
It was found that other people maintained the vehicles for them, or users did it themselves. Both used traditional reminders such as windshield stickers, postcards or visible clues from the car itself.
Using this information, a general persona was created along with their goals and likely tasks they would perform. Based on this, features were designed that would help them meet these needs.
Prototypes & Testing
Initially, paper prototypes were created incorporating these features in order to validate user flows and the hypothesis.
Users liked the simplicity of the design and understood the general idea. Affinity maps were created to prioritize the features.
Finally, lo-fi wireframes were created and additional tests were conducted. This exposed some navigation issues and allowed changes to be made in preparation for a final hi-fi prototype.
Usability tests were then conducted.
Final Results
The original assumption of the project was validated, however it was revealed that users do not take a single path while using the application.
This could be happening because users tend to use applications based upon how "comfortable" they are with similar technology.
For example, while younger users tended to use the defined path, older users tended to search for shortcuts, or not use the application feature at all.
However, all users appreciated the simple and uncluttered "look and feel" as compared to other applications.
Supporting Documentation
Initial Research & Documentation - Competitive Analysis
While I realize that there is some stiff competition out there, I noticed something that I do as a driver. I keep a simple records using small paper notebooks for each one of my cars. I try to make a note and attach any receipts that I have along with them in the book.
As such, I would like to design my application using the KISS principle and only offer the three features I have mentioned above. In addition, I think it would be great if I could figure out a way to automatically import the car information straight into the app as well. This way it make is much easier for me to enter information, without dealing with the extra features I see in these applications.
Initial Research & Documentation – Interviewee Profiles
New Driver
• 16-18 years old• Doesn’t maintain car• Little experience• Education
Opportunity
• 30-40 years old• Outsources
Maintenance• Some experience• Needs to manage
Older Driver
• 65-75 years old• DIY maintainer • Heavy experience• Mentor?
Co-worker
Initial Research & Documentation - Initial Research Questions
• What mode of transportation do you use on a daily basis?• Who maintains these vehicles?• What is maintained on the vehicles?• Do you track the services? Id so, how?• Where do you have this done?• Why is it done there?• Have you ever lost documents (How or why)• Were there any consequences because of the loss?• How do you chose your services?
Interview Results New Driver Co-worker Older Driver
Maintenance Experience Minimum Medium High
Needs & Concerns
Reliable Car. Maintenance
done by parentReliable Car at
lowest costReliable Car
with outsourced Maintenance
ConclusionDriveDox could
be used to educate
DriveDox helps keep costs low
DriveDox helps document shop
performance
Initial Research & Documentation - Initial Research Questions
Name: Bob JohnsonAge: Middle 40sJob: Project ManagerLocation: Denver, COStatus: Married
Bio: Project Manager in Denver, CO who has been married for over 20 years. He has two kids, with one who just started driving. He lives close to his older parents and helps manage their cars as well.
Behaviors & Habits:Bob maintains his vehicles using the windshield stickers the shop provides, and post cards from his insurance company and county government. He also checks on the cars if anyone notices something "wrong" with the cars. He also takes calls from his parents when they ask how to get anything done for their cars now that "everything" is on the Internet.
Initial Research & Documentation - Persona
Needs & Goals:• Manage the insurance, registration and maintenance records for his
three cars, plus provide advice to his parents for their two cars. • Receive reminders as to when insurance, registration and
maintenance is due for all the vehicles he manages, while teaching his daughter what to do as well.
• Keep costs as low as possible, especially since his daughter is heading toward college
Initial Research & Documentation – Persona (continued)
"With my daughter driving and parents getting older, I need help making sure her car is running well, and make sure we are all legal regarding insurance and registration".
Initial Research & Documentation – Storyboard
• Ability to see all services for each vehicle• Ability to see LAST service for each vehicle• Ability to see Expiration dates for Insurance and Registration• Ability to integrate records from original sources automatically• Ability to manually enter records• Ability to receive and display diagnostic data provided by the
vehicle• Capability to set reminders for all records sent by push
notification, e-mail or text• Ability to calculate total repair cost for set period (day, week,
month…) • Capability to make recommendations for next service based on
mileage, time, etc.• Ability to calculate preventative maintenance vs reactive
maintenance.• Ability to estimate registration fees based on vehicle model, zip
code, etc.• Ability to make insurance recommendations based on vehicle
mileage etc.
Prototype & Testing - Features
Prototype & Testing – Feature Prioritization
Prototype & Testing – User Flow
Prototype & Testing – Paper Prototype
These are the first Paper Prototypes.
Prototype & Testing – Paper Wireframes
These are the first Paper Wireframes with annotations.
Prototype & Testing – Software Wireframes
Prototype & Testing – Prototype
Prototype & Testing – Usability Tests
During the usability test, the Plus Column is what the users did correctly, or liked about the prototype. There are three users, P1, P2, and P3. In the Delta Column is what the users didn’t like or where improvements can be made.
Prototype & Testing – Usability Tests
Affinity map from the usability test. Here it can be seen that there are at least 4 major themes that the users commented on, or liked. a. Remindersb. Buttonsc. Navigationd. General Design