23
DriveDox Unit 6 Final project GA UX Circuit - John Cieraszynski

GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

DriveDoxUnit 6 Final project GA UX Circuit - John

Cieraszynski

Page 2: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

DriveDox Problem Statement

In our modern society, the number of tasks people are required to perform have increased dramatically. As such, people try to use several methods to remind themselves of “what” to “do” and “when”.

When it comes to the personal vehicles people use everyday, there are critical tasks that must be performed in a timely manner to make sure they have the proper insurance, registration and maintenance.

If they fail to maintain their vehicle, people can experience consequences if the form of expensive fines or unnecessary repairs.

Page 3: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

DriveDox Solution

In order to avoid these consequences, DriveDox was designed as a mobile app to assist people in making sure their car is "legal" and running properly.

In order to be competitive, DriveDox is focusing on the recording and sending reminders for only three areas (below)

• Insurance• Registration• Preventative maintenance

Page 4: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Initial Research & Documentation

Given this focus, user research was conducted asking people how they maintained their vehicles.

It was found that other people maintained the vehicles for them, or users did it themselves. Both used traditional reminders such as windshield stickers, postcards or visible clues from the car itself.

Using this information, a general persona was created along with their goals and likely tasks they would perform. Based on this, features were designed that would help them meet these needs.

Page 5: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototypes & Testing

Initially, paper prototypes were created incorporating these features in order to validate user flows and the hypothesis.

Users liked the simplicity of the design and understood the general idea. Affinity maps were created to prioritize the features.

Finally, lo-fi wireframes were created and additional tests were conducted. This exposed some navigation issues and allowed changes to be made in preparation for a final hi-fi prototype.

Usability tests were then conducted.

Page 6: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Final Results

The original assumption of the project was validated, however it was revealed that users do not take a single path while using the application.

This could be happening because users tend to use applications based upon how "comfortable" they are with similar technology.

For example, while younger users tended to use the defined path, older users tended to search for shortcuts, or not use the application feature at all.

However, all users appreciated the simple and uncluttered "look and feel" as compared to other applications.

Page 7: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Supporting Documentation

Page 8: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Initial Research & Documentation - Competitive Analysis

While I realize that there is some stiff competition out there, I noticed something that I do as a driver. I keep a simple records using small paper notebooks for each one of my cars. I try to make a note and attach any receipts that I have along with them in the book.

As such, I would like to design my application using the KISS principle and only offer the three features I have mentioned above. In addition, I think it would be great if I could figure out a way to automatically import the car information straight into the app as well. This way it make is much easier for me to enter information, without dealing with the extra features I see in these applications.

Page 9: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Initial Research & Documentation – Interviewee Profiles

New Driver

• 16-18 years old• Doesn’t maintain car• Little experience• Education

Opportunity

• 30-40 years old• Outsources

Maintenance• Some experience• Needs to manage

Older Driver

• 65-75 years old• DIY maintainer • Heavy experience• Mentor?

Co-worker

Page 10: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Initial Research & Documentation - Initial Research Questions

• What mode of transportation do you use on a daily basis?• Who maintains these vehicles?• What is maintained on the vehicles?• Do you track the services? Id so, how?• Where do you have this done?• Why is it done there?• Have you ever lost documents (How or why)• Were there any consequences because of the loss?• How do you chose your services?

Page 11: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Interview Results New Driver Co-worker Older Driver

Maintenance Experience Minimum Medium High

Needs & Concerns

Reliable Car. Maintenance

done by parentReliable Car at

lowest costReliable Car

with outsourced Maintenance

ConclusionDriveDox could

be used to educate

DriveDox helps keep costs low

DriveDox helps document shop

performance

Initial Research & Documentation - Initial Research Questions

Page 12: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Name: Bob JohnsonAge: Middle 40sJob: Project ManagerLocation: Denver, COStatus: Married

Bio: Project Manager in Denver, CO who has been married for over 20 years. He has two kids, with one who just started driving. He lives close to his older parents and helps manage their cars as well.

Behaviors & Habits:Bob maintains his vehicles using the windshield stickers the shop provides, and post cards from his insurance company and county government. He also checks on the cars if anyone notices something "wrong" with the cars. He also takes calls from his parents when they ask how to get anything done for their cars now that "everything" is on the Internet.

Initial Research & Documentation - Persona

Page 13: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Needs & Goals:• Manage the insurance, registration and maintenance records for his

three cars, plus provide advice to his parents for their two cars. • Receive reminders as to when insurance, registration and

maintenance is due for all the vehicles he manages, while teaching his daughter what to do as well.

• Keep costs as low as possible, especially since his daughter is heading toward college

Initial Research & Documentation – Persona (continued)

"With my daughter driving and parents getting older, I need help making sure her car is running well, and make sure we are all legal regarding insurance and registration".

Page 14: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Initial Research & Documentation – Storyboard

Page 15: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

• Ability to see all services for each vehicle• Ability to see LAST service for each vehicle• Ability to see Expiration dates for Insurance and Registration• Ability to integrate records from original sources automatically• Ability to manually enter records• Ability to receive and display diagnostic data provided by the

vehicle• Capability to set reminders for all records sent by push

notification, e-mail or text• Ability to calculate total repair cost for set period (day, week,

month…) • Capability to make recommendations for next service based on

mileage, time, etc.• Ability to calculate preventative maintenance vs reactive

maintenance.• Ability to estimate registration fees based on vehicle model, zip

code, etc.• Ability to make insurance recommendations based on vehicle

mileage etc.

Prototype & Testing - Features

Page 16: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Feature Prioritization

Page 17: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – User Flow

Page 18: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Paper Prototype

These are the first Paper Prototypes.

Page 19: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Paper Wireframes

These are the first Paper Wireframes with annotations.

Page 20: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Software Wireframes

Page 21: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Prototype

Page 22: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Usability Tests

During the usability test, the Plus Column is what the users did correctly, or liked about the prototype. There are three users, P1, P2, and P3. In the Delta Column is what the users didn’t like or where improvements can be made.

Page 23: GA UX Unit 6 Final Presentation Rev 2.0

Prototype & Testing – Usability Tests

Affinity map from the usability test. Here it can be seen that there are at least 4 major themes that the users commented on, or liked. a. Remindersb. Buttonsc. Navigationd. General Design