Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE OPTIMAL FEED STRUCTURE FOR LAYERS
Is there the optimal feed struc-
ture for laying hens in practice?
This question really concerns
everyone who has been taking
care of the best possible feeding
of our laying hens for a long time. It
is also a current topic today. To an-
swer the question, we might even
watch the chicken perform its feed
and nutrient intake under “natural
conditions”: it paws, it pecks here, it
pecks there, it pawls – and so does
it all the time. For the professional-
ly produced food this could mean
that the chicken likes to “seek” in
the feed and, if necessary, to eat
selectively. However, the dedicated
animal nutritionist does not want
to allow the chicken to do that - if
possible, it should lay an egg of the
highest quality every day – which is
always better from a genetic point
of view. So it’s up to you to find the
best possible compromise to avoid
selective feed intake or better nutri-
ent uptake.
Due to the natural feed intake be-
havior, the dedicated animal nu-
tritionist could quickly come to
the conclusion that a well-struc-
tured meal would be the optimal
solution. Therefore, this is also the
world’s most prevalent form of
technical feed quality for laying
poultry. But this form of feed quali-
ty can sometimes be a challenge in
manufacturing. So, as we said, we
want to avoid as much as possible
that the laying hens “eat this some-
times or that sometimes”; because
of this, the feed must have the
most uniform possible homoge-
neous structure. However, it must
also have some internal structure
and grip to support or promote the
activity of the muscle stomach –
as the paramount requirement for
a stable, healthy digestion of the
chicken. This means that we should
offer our hens as possible no “bak-
ing powder meal”. In principle, they
show little interest in eating such
fine flour. We would measure this
flour in a sieve analysis of the feed
in a particle size of less than 0.5 mm
and find it in excess (but for sure –
there is no feed without fines).
However, homogeneity of the feed
also means avoiding too large par-
ticles as much as possible – usually
this would be the coarsely milled
grain or coarse limestone that hens
require, especially in the last half of
the laying period. The hens may
like this and prefer to eat, but a bal-
anced diet is not guaranteed. So –
it depends on the homogeneity of
the feed, while the feed can then
be “a little finer – or – something
coarser”. However, it should always
have the same structure with each
new feed delivery, otherwise the
hens could tell us once before: “I do
not like to eat that now”.
As already mentioned, this goal –
depending on the existing grind-
ing and mixing technology in feed
production – is not always that easy
to fulfill.
It is therefore discussed again and
again to offer our hens a pelleted
or crumbled feed. Then selective
feeding is no longer possible and
in each pellet or crumb all nutri-
ents are contained in a compact
form. Sounds logical – the question
is – how is a good pellet made? As
always in feed production, the raw
materials must first be ground. For a
good pellet, every technician in the
feed plant will strive for the finest
possible grinding. Then the feed is
then pressed to the pellet, which
means further fine grinding (in a so-
called wet sieve analysis this is easily
detectable). During the subsequent
crumbling, by breaking the pellets,
fine flour, which could be removed
by sifting, is produced/occurs nor-
MAN
AGEMENT NUTRITION VETERINARY INCUBATION LOHMANN
TOOLBOX
BREEDING FOR SUCCESS … TOGETHER
BREEDING FOR SUCCESS … TOGETHER
mally. However, this remains nor-
mally in the feed and is delivered.
On the way up to the beak of the
chickens, the pellet or crumb is ex-
posed to copious “stress” resulting
in further debris and appearance
of fine flour. However, the hens are
reluctant to eat this fine flour – but
it contains particularly important
nutrients. Another special feature
of the pellet feed must be that no
coarse limestone can be used here
– as the most important basis for
optimum shell quality – otherwise
the technology in the feed plant
would be destroyed. The pellet
feed offers the animal the possibil-
ity of fast and “easy” food intake in
a short time, which unfortunately
can also favor vices. With mealy
feed (mash feed), hens spend more
time on feed intake and thus have
less time for perhaps undesirable
behavior patterns such as feather
pecking and cannibalism.
On the basis of these explanations,
it becomes clear that it is not so
easy to produce the optimal tech-
nical quality of the feed for the
chicken under the given conditions
in the respective compound feed
plant - or with the existing propri-
etary mixing plant. In all considera-
tions and future planning, however,
the chicken should always be in the
foreground – and not the current-
ly existing technology in the feed
plant or on the farm.
A drastic change in structure (of
the mash feed) should be avoided,
especially during the conversion
phase from rearing to laying feed.
Any structural change hinders the
much needed rapid increase in
feed intake. This is especially true
for this stage of life of the hens. If
something goes wrong with feed
intake during this phase, long-term
effects are very likely and often ir-
reversible.
Finally, it must be mentioned
that the feed often leaves
the mill in optimal structure
and balance, but does not arrive in
this form and balance at the beak
of the birds. Additional mechanical
stress and segregation can lead to
a highly variable nutrient uptake.
This is to be avoided, since today’s
animals have a lower feed intake
capacity and lay an egg with very
short breaks every day for many
weeks. Each deficiency has an im-
mediate effect on egg mass pro-
duction and body weight, and it is
then associated with yield losses.
MAN
AGEMENT NUTRITION VETERINARY INCUBATION LOHMANN
TOOLBOX
Optimal mash feed structure