Upload
cassady-dawson
View
40
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
FY 2013 School Board Proposed Budget. Presentation to Board of Supervisors March 7 th , 2012. Where the Money Comes From. FY 2013 Amount ($ in millions) Carryover $10.0 County transfer $536.5 County VRS reserve $10.0 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
PRESENTATION TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MARCH 7 T H , 2012
FY 2013 School Board Proposed Budget
2
Where the Money Comes From
FY 2013 Amount ($ in millions)
Carryover $10.0County transfer $536.5County VRS reserve $10.0State revenue $242.2Federal funds $14.1Other funds $6.9 Total $819.7
County Transfer Request = $536.5 million
65.5%County
Transfer
29.6%State
Revenue
3
Where the Money Goes
Pupil Transportation
Administration
Attendance & Health
Instruction 78.5%
TechnologyOperations & Maintenance
Facilities
FY 2013 Amount ($ in millions)
Instruction $643.9Administration $16.7Attendance & Health $10.3Pupil Transportation $53.9Facilities $2.8Operation & Maintenance $71.1Technology $21.1
Total $819.7
Note: Expenditure categoriesdefined by Virginia Board of Education
4
Budget and Enrollment Growth
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
$390.2
$461.2
$529.3
$605.6
$690.6
$745.6
$735.6
$710.3
$745.9
$819.7
40,7
51
44,0
14
47,3
61
50,4
78
54,0
47
57,0
09
60,0
96
63,2
20
65,6
68
68,1
70
Budget and enrollment growth will not necessarily be consistent due to inflation, salary enhancements, and increases beyond the control of the school division such as VRS in any given year.
VirginiaRetirement System (VRS) increase
$ in millions
FY
20
04
FY
20
05
FY
20
06
FY
20
07
FY
20
08
FY
20
09
FY
20
10
FY
20
11
FY
20
12 FY
2
01
3*
5
FY 2013 Expenditure Increases
VRS$34.4 million
Enrollment Growth
$23.4 million
Compensa-tion
$13.8 million
Other$0.6 million
46.6% due to increased VRS contributions set at State level
31.7% due to increased staffing for growth in student enrollment of 2,50218.7% due to increased employee costs and targeted salary increases.2.2% due to increased staffing and operational expenses for two new schools.
0.8% due to increased costs of other operational expenses across all departments.
New Schools$1.6 million
Breakdown of $73.8 million budget increase
6
Cost Per Pupil (CPP)
FY12 CPP Comparison
Division FY12
Arlington $18,047
Alexandria $17,618
Fairfax $12,820
Loudoun $11,014
Prince William $9,852
Source: FY 2012 Washington Area Boards of Education (WABE) Guide
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$9,604
$10,266 $11,379
$12,023
$12,751 $12,780
$11,997
$10,833 $11,014
$11,752
FY
2004
FY
2005
FY
2006
FY
2007
FY
2008
FY
2009
FY
2010
FY
2011
FY
2012 F
Y
2013*
Ten-Year History of LCPS CPP
By WABE definition, the Cost Per Pupil does not include adult education, self-funded summer school, health services, selected earmarked grants, and the portion of the CIP funded by cash.
* Proposed
7
Budgeting Values
Provide high quality public education
8
Provide High Quality Education
95.3% of seniors last year graduated on-time.
All high schools ranked among best in Washington Post Challenge Index—five among the top in the nation.
10 middle schools ranked “Schools to Watch”—more than any other school district in the nation.
One of 388 school divisions nationwide honored with “AP Achievement List” by the College Board— one of only 3 in Virginia.
7 schools received 2012 Governors Award for Educational Excellence.
38 schools awarded Energy Star designation for energy efficiency.
Sports teams won 6 state championships last year.
Budgeting Values
Provide high quality public education
Remain sensitive to economic environment
7
Sensitivity to Economic Environment
Comparative History of Budget Reductions(in $ millions)
9
FiscalYear
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Superintendent
Proposed
$801.4
$757.7
$764.7
$757.2
$831.7
School Board
Proposed
($7.1)
($10.5)
no change
no change
($12.0) plus $1.7 in
reinstated
income
FinalAppropriatio
n
($48.7)
($14.6)
($54.4)
($11.3)
?
Despite modest signs of economic
recovery, the School Board has made strategic
reductions to the Superintendent’s proposed budget
in FY 2013 to reflect the
continued need for cost containment.
Sensitivity to Economic Environment10
* Revenue Increases
School Board Reductionsto FY 2013 Superintendent’s Proposed Operating Budget
Amount($ in millions)
$2.8
$0.3
$1.3
$2.6
$1.8
$0.8
$2.4
$1.7
$13.7
FTEs
20.0
35.0
13.0
41.0
109.0
Area of Reduction
Salaries
System-wide staff development
Full Day Kindergarten (phase 1)
FLES program scale-back
System-wide non-salary funding
Classroom-based New Positions
Administrative/Support New Positions
Reinstatement of AP and athletic fees*Net Reduction to County Transfer
Reductions have been targeted to
minimize impact on classroom-based
instruction, maximize
competitiveness,and reduce long-term liabilities.
Budgeting Values
Provide high quality public education
Remain sensitive to economic environment
Maintain class sizes
7
Maintain Class Sizes
Source: FY 2012 WABE Guide
Only Prince William County has a lower CPP than Loudoun
County. Dramatically larger
secondary class sizes helps to explain how.
Class sizes have increased twice in Loudoun County in the last four years. The School Board
wants to avoid further increasing
class sizes.
11
Division
Alexandria
Arlington
Fairfax
Loudoun
Prince William
Elementary
18.1
20.3
21.5
23.3 (#5)
22.5
Middle
19.9
20.6
24.4
23.1 (#3)
28.3
High
21.7
19.9
25.1
24.3 (#3)
28.8
FY 2012 Average Class Sizes
Budgeting Values
Provide high quality public education
Remain sensitive to economic environment
Maintain class sizes
Focus staffing increases in the school and classroom
7
Focus Staffing Increases in School & Classroom
Source: FY 2012 WABE Guide
The proposed FY 2013 Operating
Budget deliberately reduces the number of non-school based staffing in Loudoun County by an entire percentage point. This should enable
Loudoun to lead the region in school-based staffing at
93.6%
12
Division
Alexandria
Arlington
Fairfax
Loudoun
Prince William
School-Based
91.6%
90.4%
93.0%
92.6% (#2)
89.6%
Non-School Based
8.4%
9.6%
7.0%
7.4%
10.4%
Comparison of FY 2012 Staffing Focus
Budgeting Values
Provide high quality public education
Remain sensitive to economic environment
Maintain class sizes
Focus staffing increases in the school and classroom
Provide competitive compensation
7
Prince William
Loudoun
Fairfax
Arlington
Alexandria
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000
Provide Competitive Compensation
$72,635
$59,367
$61,304 (#4)
Comparison of FY 2012 Teacher Salaries
13
Source: FY 2012 WABE Guide
$63,980
$71,239
$43,715 (#3)
$43,633
$43,910
$44,440
$43,612
$99,081 (#3)
$99,064
$101,298
$93,015
$99,433
Provide Competitive Compensation
*School Board proposed, all other Superintendent proposed
The proposed FY 2013 Operating Budget focuses pay increases
disproportionately at the lower end of the pay scales and caps increases at the top of each pay scale at FY 2012 levels. This is to help compress our pay scale by increasing pay at the
lower levels while restricting upper level growth. 95% of all employees,
however, would still get a pay increase – most either $1,750 or 0.50$/hour.
This year’s pay increase will represent only the second one for LCPS
employees since FY 2009 and is needed to keep Loudoun competitive with most surrounding jurisdictions,
particularly Fairfax County.
14
Division Salary Increase
Alexandria* up 1.2%
Arlington up 2.0%
Fairfax* up 4.7%
Loudoun* up zero to 4.0%
Prince William zero.
Comparison of Proposed FY 2013 Salary Increases
Budgeting Values
Provide high quality public education
Remain sensitive to economic environment
Maintain class sizes
Focus staffing increases in the school and classroom
Provide competitive compensation
Support opening of new schools
7
Support Opening of New Schools
The proposed FY 2013 budget includes 39 new positions to support the opening of Frederick Douglass ES and John Champe HS in fall 2012 and to prepare for the opening of ES-16 and ES-22 in fall 2013.
16
New School Positions
PrincipalsAssistant PrincipalsGuidance StaffTechnology StaffLibrariansCustodiansAthletic StaffNursing StaffClerical/Support Staff
Total New School Positions:
New FTEs
2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 16.0 1.0 2.0 5.0
39.0
These new school positions represent a reduction of 13 FTEs
from the number requested by the Superintendent, primarily to
account for smaller initial student populations at these new schools. Rather these additional
positions can be added with future growth in student enrollment as needed.
Maintain Existing Facilities
Capital Asset Preservation Program (CAPP)
17
System Component Replacement
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
Electrical $555,ooo $135,000 - $225,000 $335,000 $435,000
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning $175,000 $255,000 $195,000 $135,000 $180,000 $135,000
Plumbing $205,000 $960,000 $150,000 $80,000 $50,000 $100,000
Resurfacing $750,000 $1,022,000 $900,000 $380,000 $497,000 $550,000
Roofing $1,280,000 $2,380,000 $4,050,000 $4,300,000 $1,550,000 $1,350,000
Structural Repairs $210,000 $375,000 $620,000 $375,000 $380,000 $260,000
Windows - $450,000 $200,000 $450,000 $300,000 -
Fiscal Year Totals $3,175,000 $5,577,000 $6,115,000 $5,945,000 $3,292,000 $2,830,000
Extending the useful life of Loudoun’s school facilities
CAPP funding in the amount of $3,175,000 in FY 2013 will help catch-up on delayed maintenance and repairs on school facilities over the past few years.
18
Provide for Future School Facilities
Comparison of Student Growth ProjectionsFY 2012-16 and FY 2013-18 CIPs
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
66,266 69,323
72,395 75,011
77,437 79,724
81,966
65,688 68,170
70,652 72,396
73,789 75,191 76,143
Updated enrollment
projections this year indicate
5,823 fewer new students byFY 2018.
As a result, Loudoun will require fewer
school facilities to accommodate
anticipated student growth for
the next several years.
FY 2012-16 CIP FY 2013-18 CIP
FY 2013-18 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
• Construction of 3 New Elementary Schools (ES-21, ES-23 and ES-28)
• Construction of 2 New Middle Schools (MS-7 and MS-9)
• Construction of 3 New High Schools (HS-6, HS-8 and HS-11)
• Construction of Monroe Advanced Technology Academy (MATA)
• Conversion of Monroe to the Alternative High School
• Additions to Mercer MS and Freedom HS
• Renovation to Loudoun Valley HS
19
The six-year School Board adopted CIP includes:
13 projects totaling $685.5 million over 6 years($234.1 million less than the FY 12-16 School Board adopted CIP)
Where do we go from here?
Realize the tremendous asset that Loudoun’s public school system is to its community and its future.
Focus on providing affordable, high-quality schools for Loudoun’s children.
Balance the needs of a variety of constituencies in the budget process.
Steward public funds wisely through constant analysis, review, dialog and collaboration throughout the year.
Recognize that this is just the beginning of a four-year relationship.
20